Next Article in Journal
Single-Cell Chromatin Accessibility Data Combined with GWAS Improves Detection of Relevant Cell Types in 59 Complex Phenotypes
Next Article in Special Issue
Disulfiram/Copper Suppresses Cancer Stem Cell Activity in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Cells by Inhibiting BMI1 Expression
Previous Article in Journal
Two Conserved Amino Acids Characterized in the Island Domain Are Essential for the Biological Functions of Brassinolide Receptors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Drug Repurposing in Cancer Therapy: Influence of Patient’s Genetic Background in Breast Cancer Treatment
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Exploring Amodiaquine’s Repurposing Potential in Breast Cancer Treatment—Assessment of In-Vitro Efficacy & Mechanism of Action

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11455; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911455
by Vineela Parvathaneni, Rameswari Chilamakuri, Nishant S. Kulkarni, Nabeela F. Baig, Saurabh Agarwal and Vivek Gupta *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11455; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911455
Submission received: 30 August 2022 / Revised: 18 September 2022 / Accepted: 19 September 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Repurposing for Cancer Therapies)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this manuscript, the authors tested the anti-cancer effect of amodiaquine (AQ) using different breast cancer cell lines. Although various data are presented, the novelty is limited because the anti-cancer effect of AQ has been evaluated on other cancer types. Furthermore, some important issues are not dissolved. For example, after administration, the AQ will be converted into another structure by liver, will this affect its anticancer effect? In vivo anti-cancer study should be performed to demonstrate the application potential of AQ.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

 The authors need to address the following issues before I can recommend its publication: 

1.        “AQ may have the capability to exert its anti-cancer efficacy via Estrogen and progesterone receptors predominantly …” but MDA-MB-231 cell lines not expressing any of these ER/PR/HER2 receptors.

2.       Vasculogenic Mimicry Assay, tubular network is not clear in control group, the network should consist of many small grids. Additionally, cells should stain with Calcein AM Assay to confirm the cells were alive.

3.       In “3.5. D Spheroid Studies” section, the discussions are not enough. For MCF-7 cells, why the AQ’s efficacy in multiple dose is lower than single dose.

4.       In Fig4 MDA-MB-231, AQ 15uM, Day 10, the spheroid is clear on the left of the picture, but in Fig 5, spheroid volume is nearly 0, please give explanation.

5.       The description in line 482 and 483 is not properly, it is green fluorescence not protein.

6.       In Fig. 7, why is there red fluorescence in MCF 7 but no red fluorescence (Dead cell portion) in MDA-MB-231 cells.

7.      The title is “Repurposing an Antimalarial Drug for Efficacy in Diverse Breast Cancer Subtypes”, but the main experiments only used MCF-7 and MDAMB-321 breast cancer cell lines, and other breast cancer subtypes need to be added to this article.

8.       Scale bars should be indicated in Figure 4 and 7;

9.       Some related references should be added: Exploration. 2022, 2, 20210238.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript has been improved and can be published.

Back to TopTop