Next Article in Journal
Tumor-Informed Approach Improved ctDNA Detection Rate in Resected Pancreatic Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanisms of Kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala) Tolerance to Individual and Combined Stresses of Drought and Elevated Temperature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nitrate–Nitrite–Nitric Oxide Pathway: A Mechanism of Hypoxia and Anoxia Tolerance in Plants

1
Hebei Key Laboratory of Soil Ecology, Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
2
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
3
Xiong’an Institute of Innovation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiong’an New Area, Baoding 071700, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11522; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911522
Submission received: 25 August 2022 / Revised: 14 September 2022 / Accepted: 17 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
Oxygen (O2) is the most crucial substrate for numerous biochemical processes in plants. Its deprivation is a critical factor that affects plant growth and may lead to death if it lasts for a long time. However, various biotic and abiotic factors cause O2 deprivation, leading to hypoxia and anoxia in plant tissues. To survive under hypoxia and/or anoxia, plants deploy various mechanisms such as fermentation paths, reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), antioxidant enzymes, aerenchyma, and adventitious root formation, while nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), and nitric oxide (NO) have shown numerous beneficial roles through modulating these mechanisms. Therefore, in this review, we highlight the role of reductive pathways of NO formation which lessen the deleterious effects of oxidative damages and increase the adaptation capacity of plants during hypoxia and anoxia. Meanwhile, the overproduction of NO through reductive pathways during hypoxia and anoxia leads to cellular dysfunction and cell death. Thus, its scavenging or inhibition is equally important for plant survival. As plants are also reported to produce a potent greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O) when supplied with NO3 and NO2, resembling bacterial denitrification, its role during hypoxia and anoxia tolerance is discussed here. We point out that NO reduction to N2O along with the phytoglobin-NO cycle could be the most important NO-scavenging mechanism that would reduce nitro-oxidative stress, thus enhancing plants’ survival during O2-limited conditions. Hence, understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in reducing NO toxicity would not only provide insight into its role in plant physiology, but also address the uncertainties seen in the global N2O budget.

1. Introduction

Oxygen (O2) deficiency hinders respiration and other biochemical processes essential for plants’ survival, but extreme events such as heavy precipitation and flooding cause waterlogging, which directly affects O2 supply and prevents their growth [1]. Moreover, several other conditions can also lead to hypoxic and anaerobic conditions in well-aerated tissues of plants. For example, pathogen attacks, tissue exposure to freezing, sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone, and water deficiencies can cause anaerobic conditions, leading to anaerobic metabolisms in plant tissues [2,3]. Abiotic stress such as salt stress can disrupt the symplastic connections between cells, which decreases the permeability of cells to O2, resulting in hypoxia and anoxia [4,5]. Moreover, under normal conditions, an endogenously generated O2 gradient also exists, such that the O2 concentration may fall below 5% in plant tissues, such as in seeds, bulk tissues, shoot apical meristems, and roots [6].
Hypoxia and anoxia result in the modification of various normal metabolic paths [7]. Thus, they usually inhibit respiration, photosynthesis, nitrogen assimilation, biological nitrogen fixation, water and nutrient uptake, and stomata closure in plants [5,7,8,9,10,11] through a reduced adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydrogen (NADH) ratio (NAD+/NADH), and cell viability [12]. Meanwhile, the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) is triggered, which severely damages the cell components [13]. Moreover, during hypoxia and anoxia, a drop in pH causes cytoplasmic acidosis which affects numerous metabolic activities that may even contribute to plant death [14]. Overall, hypoxia and anoxia have numerous deleterious effects on plant metabolism (Figure 1). The effects of O2 deficiency could be more severe to hypoxia- and anoxia-intolerant plants as compared to tolerant plants. For example, O2 stress directly reduces germination rate and coleoptile growth in barley, oat, and rice, while growth is more pronounced in anoxia-tolerant rice than in barley and oat [1,15].
To survive O2 deficiency, plants use numerous strategies through biochemical, anatomical, and morphological changes (Figure 1). However, the accumulation of ethanol and lactic acid (major products of the fermentation process) are toxic [16]. Moreover, antioxidant defense systems could also be a limiting factor if the stress is present for a longer time or beyond the tolerance capacity. This suggests that if anaerobic processes proceed for a longer time, the ultimate fate of plants is death. Along with metabolic changes, plant adaptation mechanisms can improve tissue O2 status. A number of mechanisms have been reported to help plants to improve O2 status during soil waterlogging conditions. For example, O2 distribution from aerial parts to roots is facilitated by the formation of aerenchyma [17,18], and its formation is faster in flood-tolerant than intolerant plants [18,19]. Similarly, adventitious root formation can also improve the O2 status of plants during waterlogging conditions [20]. Meanwhile, the balanced production of ROS and RNS and an increase in antioxidant activities can enhance tolerance to hypoxia and anoxia in plants [21].
Nitric oxide (NO), a widely recognized signaling molecule, plays an important role in hypoxia and anoxia tolerance in plants [22,23]. Not only NO but also nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), and nitrate reductase (NR, EC 1.6.6.1) play a similar role in plants during O2 deficiency [24]. This suggests that tolerance to O2 deficiency is due to the reductive pathways of NO formation. However, numerous studies indicate that O2 deficiency, as well as other stresses, can trigger NO formation [23,24,25]. Meanwhile, a higher concentration of NO could be cytotoxic, leading to the accumulation of ROS and other RNS that would lead to nitro-oxidative stress [25,26]. Nitric oxide could promote [27] or inhibit [28] ethylene biosynthesis, a key phytohormone for plants’ survival during O2 limitation, while the latter case is mediated through the S-nitrosylation of methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT1) [28]. Phytohormones such as salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid, and abscisic acid (ABA) reduce oxidative stresses and enhance the activities of antioxidants during stress conditions [29,30]. However, NO is reported to inhibit the activities of antioxidants, as well as proteins involved in regulating phytohormones through S- nitrosylation [30,31,32], thus, again, increasing nitro-oxidative stress in plants.
Thus, there should be a fine regulation of these signaling molecules (NO, ROS, and other RNS) for beneficial roles. The key to surviving during hypoxia and anoxia depends upon mechanisms that could lessen the harmful effects of nitro-oxidative damages by increasing the activities of adaptation mechanisms. Therefore, understanding the reductive pathways of NO formation along with NO scavenging mechanisms would provide insight into the mechanisms involved in lessening the effects of O2 deprivation. Hence, the main aim of this review is to highlight the role of reductive pathways of NO formation, while emphasizing the NO scavenging mechanisms that could reduce the nitro-oxidative stress and increase the hypoxia and anoxia tolerance in plants.

2. Pathways of NO Formation during Hypoxia and Anoxia

Various pathways of NO formation in plant cells have been documented, and they have been categorized into oxidative and reductive pathways. Oxidative pathways are oxygen-dependent, involving L-arginine, polyamine, and hydroxylamine [33]. The reductive pathways of NO formation occur during low O2 and are dependent on NO3, NR, NO2, plasma membrane NR, plasma membrane-bound nitrite reductase (PM NiNOR), xanthine oxidoreductase in plant peroxisomes, photosynthetic-electron-transport-chain-dependent NO2 reduction in chloroplasts, and mitochondrial electron transport chains (ETCs) such as cytochrome bc1 complex (complex III, EC 1.10.2.2), cytochrome c oxidase (CcO, EC 1.9.3.1), and alternative oxidase (AOX, EC 1.10.3.11) in mitochondria [33,34]. In Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, NR, together with nitric-oxide-forming nitrate reductase (NOFNiR), reduces NO2 to NO [35]. Moreover, NO2 can be reduced to NO in acidic pH without the involvement of any enzyme. NO production pathways during O2 deficiency and other stresses would be different. For example, salt stress can increase both oxidative pathways (l-arginine-dependent) [36] as well as the reductive pathways of NO production [37]. However, during O2 deficiency, NO is produced through the reductive pathways [33]. Interestingly, this occurs not only during O2 deficiency but many other biotic- and abiotic-stress-induced reductive pathways of NO formation. For example, salinity stress, water deficiency, UV radiation, freezing, pathogen attacks, and wounding can trigger NO production in plants [38,39,40,41,42,43], which could be due to the fact that these stresses could lead to hypoxia and anoxia in plant tissues, while its formation could be a defense strategy to survive harsh conditions.
Nitric oxide is formed in various cell compartments such as the cytosol, apoplasts, chloroplasts, peroxisomes, and mitochondria of plants through enzymatic or non-enzymatic pathways [33]. Nitric oxide production in various compartments of plant cells has numerous functions. For example, NO formed in chloroplasts can prevent the oxidation of chloroplastic lipids and proteins, while NO-mediated peroxynitrite (ONOO) production may result in its damage [44]. Similarly, NO formed in mitochondria can protect its components, while NO-mediated ONOO production causes mitochondrial dysfunction [45]. As O2 limitation, as well as other stresses, leads to a higher level of NO formation through the reductive pathways, understanding the possible mechanisms for maintaining the optimum level of NO is also essential and is discussed in later sections.

3. Role of Nitrate and Nitrate Reductase (NR) during Hypoxia and Anoxia Tolerance

Nitrate is not only an important form of nitrogen (N) source to plants but also a signaling molecule [46]. It is usually a major form of N in aerobic soil, and its uptake by plant roots is achieved through NO3 transporters [47]. After being uptaken by roots, NO3 is reduced to NO2 by an enzyme called NR in the cytosol or plasma membrane or stored in the vacuole or transported to shoots and leaves for subsequent reduction [16]. Under normoxia, NO2 is transported to plastids/chloroplasts and is reduced to ammonium (NH4+) by nitrite reductase (NiR, EC 1.7.7.1). Then, glutamine synthetase/glutamate-oxoglutarate aminotransferase (GS, EC 6.3.1.2)/GOGAT, EC 1.4.1.13) assimilates NH4+ into amino acids. However, during hypoxia and anoxia, the NO3 or NH4+ assimilation path to amino acid as well as NO3 transport to the aerial parts is greatly reduced [48]. For example, O2 deficiency decreases NO3 and NH4+ assimilation and N incorporation into amino acids in various plant species as compared to normoxia [49,50,51]. Although N incorporation into amino acids is inhibited during O2 deficiency, several pieces of research have shown that NR is highly activated and NO3 is reduced to NO2 [52]. Interestingly, NO3 consumption by soybean plants in hydroponics systems was higher during hypoxia than normoxia [48], which suggests that more NO3 is metabolized during O2-limited conditions in plant cells. Therefore, most of the derivatives of NO3 might be lost to the environment in the form of gases from plants during O2 limitation.
Several previous studies have shown that NO3 and NR are beneficial for hypoxia and anoxia tolerance. Germinating seeds generally experience hypoxic and anoxic conditions [53,54,55] due to the compaction and hindrance of O2 diffusion by the outermost layers of seeds [56]. Studies have reported that NO3 is beneficial during seed germination. For example, supplementation or priming with NO3 increases the viability of germination in seeds of various plants [57,58,59,60]. Light and temperature influence seed germination, while NO3 can reduce the dependency on environmental factors such as light [58,61] and temperature [62] during germination. Moreover, NO3 can promote germination in seeds during salt, metal, and heat stresses [63,64,65]. The mechanisms of seed germination by NO3 might be due to NO production in cytosol and mitochondria through the reductive pathways [55]. Similarly, NO3 has been shown to increase activities of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6) and superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1) during the germination process [59], which could scavenge ROS, thus preventing oxidative damage and promoting germination. Seed germination is promoted during conditions with a lower level of ABA [66] and a higher level of gibberellic acid (GA) [67], while NO3 supplementation leads to the upregulation of the ABA catabolic gene CYP707A2 and GA biosynthesis gene GA20ox1 [64], thus promoting seed germination by decreasing ABA and increasing GA levels. Although ethylene is widely reported to promote seed germination, the role of NO3 on its biosynthesis is unclear. Endogenous NO3 levels in germinating seeds drop significantly during the first 24 h post-imbibition, and the role of NO3 and NR activity in anaerobic seed germination depends on NADH and NADPH [68], which could be due to the fact that NO3 serves as an alternate electron acceptor [69], similar to bacterial denitrification [70]. This is supported by the fact that NO3 and O2 limitation induces high levels of both NO and N2O emissions from plants [24].
Waterlogging reduces several nutrients in plants, affecting plant metabolism [71], while the supplementation of NO3 increases the uptake of nutrients such as N, P, Fe, and Mn [72]. Nitrate can improve cytoplasmic acidification caused by anoxia in plants [73,74] while decreasing fermentative enzymes such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, EC 1.1.1.27), pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC, EC 4.1.1.1), and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH, EC 1.1.1.1) [75]. Lower levels of lactate and ethanol in plant roots [10,75] and an increase in the ATP level were observed in NO3-treated plants during waterlogging [75], which suggest that NO3 is highly beneficial to reducing toxic metabolites while increasing the energy status of waterlogged plants. Antioxidants such as SOD, CAT, ascorbate peroxidase (APX, EC 1.11.1.11), and guaiacol peroxidase (POD, EC 1.11.1.7) remove O2 and H2O2 [76,77]. Nitrate-fed plants show increased activities of antioxidants such as SOD and CAT, APX, and POD, thereby decreasing the level of H2O2 and O2 [21,78], thus increasing tolerance to hypoxia and anoxia during waterlogging. Speedy recovery following re-oxygenation is equally important for plant growth, while NO3 has been shown to be beneficial during hypoxia and subsequent re-oxygenation by inducing antioxidant systems in plants [79].
Hypoxia and anoxia in roots caused by flooding decrease chlorophyll content in the leaves of plants, thus decreasing the plant biomass and photosynthesis rate [11]. Nitrate is more beneficial in terms of biomass, net photosynthesis rate, chlorophyll, and protein content as compared to NH4+ and glycine [21,80]. Moreover, the concentration of metabolites such as sucrose, γ-aminobutyrate, succinate, and nucleoside triphosphate are reduced significantly in the absence of NO3 during hypoxia in maize root [73]. Alanine aminotransferase (AlaAT, EC 2.6.1.2), via the reversible conversion of pyruvate and glutamate to alanine and 2-oxoglutarate, is involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism [81]. The foliar spraying of NO3 during waterlogging increases AlaAT and GOGAT activities along with an increase in amino acid in plants [82], suggesting that NO3 is involved in regulating both glycolysis and the TCA cycle during O2 deficiency.
The nodulation of soybean plants with symbiotic bacteria is beneficial for plant growth. However, during hypoxia, non-nodulated soybean plants supplied with NO3 have shown many beneficial effects such as more antioxidant and less oxidative damage through reduced ROS and H2O2 production as compared to nodulated soybean plants without NO3 [79]. Similarly, nodulated soybean plants exposed to hypoxia decreased in biomass by 34%, while non-nodulated plants supplemented with NO3 only decreased in biomass by 12% [83]. Moreover, plant NR is involved in nitrogen fixation, energy generation, maintaining cytosolic pH, and the metabolism of carbon and nitrogen in nodules during hypoxia in plant–microbe symbiosis [84,85,86]. This suggests that during hypoxia, NO3 and NR are more beneficial than the symbiotic relationship alone.
Phytoglobins (Pgbs) play an important role during hypoxia and anoxia tolerance in plants. Numerous studies have reported that the increase in Pgbs during hypoxia and anoxia [87,88] and its expression are related to survival during O2-limited conditions in plants [87]. Nitrate nutrition during hypoxia has been beneficial in the overexpression of Pgbs [88]. During hypoxia and anoxia, NO3 and NR are involved in ATP production through reductive pathways and the phytoglobin-NO respiration cycle [86,89]. This phytoglobin-NO respiration cycle helps in maintaining cellular bioenergetics by preventing the over-reduction of NAD and NADH [90]. Ethylene is responsible for the stability of the group VII ethylene response factor which could lead to the induction of several hypoxic genes [91], while NO3 nutrition during hypoxia has led to the activation of the 4.5-fold induction of the ETR1 gene (At1g66340.1) responsible for ethylene production in plants [88]. The role of ethylene during hypoxia and anoxia tolerance could be due to its role in NO scavenging by inducing Phytoglobin 1 (Pgb1) mRNA levels, as ethylene does not increase NR activities during O2-limited conditions [92]. Interestingly, NO3 is the substrate responsible for NO production, and it also plays a role in NO scavenging through inducing Pgb1 as well as ethylene biosynthesis, suggesting a more beneficial role of NO3.
Redox imbalance during hypoxia and anoxia directly affects cellular metabolisms [93]. Various studies have reported that NO3 supplementation to hypoxic and anoxic plant tissues can improve the redox state [16,94,95]. For example, NO3 and NR maintain redox balance during hypoxia in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) [12]. Mitochondria are the most important organelles for survival, and their functionality is more crucial under hypoxia and anoxia [96]. In the absence of O2, NO3 could act as a terminal electron acceptor in plants [69], while it also plays an important role in maintaining mitochondrial ultrastructure during anoxia. For example, in the absence of NO3, cristae disappear, the matrix loses its electron density, and after a few hours, mitochondria completely degrade [69], while its presence protects the ultrastructure of mitochondria during hypoxia and anoxia [97]. In humans, NO3 can protect against ischemia/reperfusion injury, reduce blood pressure, and improve oxidative phosphorylation efficiency (P/O ratio), indicating a decrease in proton leakage and membrane potential is distributed towards ATP synthesis in mitochondria [98].
Nitrate reduction via NR can delay cell death during hypoxia and delay the anoxic symptoms in plants [99], while its inhibition can significantly disturb the growth [95]. Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) mutant plants lacking NR reductase are more sensitive to O2 deprivation as compared to wild types by showing symptoms of rapid wilting, more ethanol and lactate production, and less ATP generation [94], suggesting the role of NO3 is due to its reduction to NO2. NR plays a role in the maintenance of energy status for nitrogen fixation under O2-limited conditions in Medicago truncatula nodules [100]. The use of NR inhibitors in the root system of nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) results in a significant decrease in the ATP/ADP ratio under flooding and salinity stresses [5]. Waterlogging significantly degrades membrane lipids [101], while NO3 and NR activity can delay the anoxia-induced degradation of membrane lipids in plant cells [102]. Higher expression of NR in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) than tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) was associated with a high tolerance of hypoxia in the roots [103]. During hypoxia and anoxia, NR plays an important role in plant biology by regulating NO production by supplying electrons to NOFNiR and truncated hemoglobin [104]. The regulation of NO is critical, as it is a signaling and also toxic molecule if it is accumulated in a higher amount in a cell [105]. Overall, both NO3and NR are involved in hypoxia and anoxia tolerance with numerous benefits, which suggests that NO2 is also involved in the mechanisms. However, long-term O2 limitation would affect the NR acclivity, thus, again, questioning plants’ survival during O2-limitation conditions. For example, the NR level increases during O2 limitation conditions, while NR-mRNA remains constant during the early hours of O2 limitation and decreases after 48 h [99], suggesting long-term O2 limitation affects its activity. Moreover, NO, which is produced by NR itself, also decreases the level of NR protein through posttranslational modifications and ubiquitylation by affecting amino acids involved in binding the essential flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and molybdenum cofactors [35,106]. Therefore, O2 limitation and a higher level of NO formation would affect NR activity after long-term hypoxia and anoxia, thus, again, affecting plants’ survival. Moreover, a higher concentration of NO3 is reported to affect plant growth through the increased production of NO, thus increasing lipid peroxidation and the H2O2 level [107]. This dose-dependent effect of NO3 might be due to the fact that beyond a certain level of its concentration, there would be more NO production through the reductive pathways, which could not be scavenged effectively, thus promoting ONOO formation, causing harmful effects.

4. Role of Nitrite during Hypoxia and Anoxia Tolerance

A well-known pathway of NO2 metabolism in plants is its assimilation to amino acids through reduction to NH4+. However, during O2 deprivation, the assimilatory pathway is inhibited, and NO2 is either accumulated in the cytoplasm [49] or reduced to NO by the NR in the cytoplasm or transported to mitochondria for reduction [108]. This is further supported by the fact that NiR is inhibited during O2-limited conditions [49]. Although NO2 assimilation to amino acids is significantly reduced during hypoxia and anoxia, NR is activated, and the NO2 level increases [16,52]. Studies suggest that NO2 reduction to NO through reductive pathways is beneficial during hypoxia and anoxia [108].
Similar to NO3, NO2 can promote seed germination in plants [55,57,109]. Moreover, thermo-dependency during seed germination was lowered in the presence of NO2 [61]. During low O2 levels in mitochondria, NO2 can regulate the surrounding O2 concentration through the production of NO [53]. Exogenous NO2 can also reduce both ethanol and lactate production [110] and can minimize the acidification of cytoplasm in plants during hypoxia and anoxia [74]. Similarly, the role of NO2 in the protection of mitochondrial structures and functions has been well documented. NO2 supplementation during O2-limited conditions to the mitochondria isolated from roots of pea (Pisum sativum) shows better mitochondrial integrity, the energization of the inner mitochondrial membrane, increased ATP synthesis, and decreased production of ROS and also decreased lipid peroxidation [111]. Hypoxia and anoxia can degrade the activities of complex I [112], while NO2 supplementation can result in its higher levels and activities [111]. The role of NO2 in hypoxia tolerance in humans and animals has been well documented [113,114]. It could be through its reduction to NO, as hypoxia and anoxia trigger NO2 reduction to NO. However, a higher concentration of NO2 can lead to membrane damage, lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, mutation, DNA damage, and cell death [115], which could be through a higher level of NO production. So, for its beneficial role, its concentration should be regulated.

5. Role of Nitric Oxide during Hypoxia and Anoxia Tolerance

The role of NO in plant physiology has been described by numerous researchers. The reductive pathway of NO formation in plants is reported to be beneficial in plants as it promotes seed germination, increases biomass and root formation, increases energy status during O2 limitation, promotes tolerance to various biotic and abiotic stresses, and promotes the induction of different defense-related genes, and many others, as tabulated in Table 1.
Similar to NO3 and NO2, NO also stimulates germination in various plants species in a dose-dependent manner, i.e., low to medium NO has a positive effect, while a higher concentration inhibits germination [138,139,140,141]. The mechanism involved in seed germination by NO could be due to its capacity to reduce respiration rates and ROS levels while increasing carbohydrate metabolism and the level of amino acids and organic acids in germinating seeds [55]. The α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) activities of rice seed germination in the flooded condition are directly linked to seedling survival [142], while NO and GA can induce the activity of α-amylase [143]. However, the increase in activities of α-amylase by NO is time-dependent, such that at an early hour, it increases the activities, while prolonged NO exposure strongly reduces the activities [55]. This time-dependent role of NO could be due to the fact that prolonged exposure to NO could accumulate RNS which inhibit its activity. NO is involved in controlling seed dormancy through inducing the degradation of the ABI5 protein, thus enhancing ABA catabolism [144] while also increasing antioxidant enzymes [132,141]. However, a high level of NO can be toxic to cells, as it can inhibit mitochondrial respiration irreversibly [105] as well as inhibit antioxidants enzymes [145], which could explain the mechanisms of inhibiting germination by a higher level of NO.
NO production in plant cells during hypoxia enhances the survival rate [146]. During waterlogging conditions, the application of NO donor increases leaf area, plant biomass, harvest index, lint yield, and boll number in the cotton plant [136]. Similarly, the net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content increase, and MDA, H2O2, ADH, and PDC content decrease [136]. The role of NO in increasing the net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content could be due to its role in inhibiting the transcriptional activation of chlorophyll breakdown pathway genes such as SRG, NYC1, PPH, and PAO [147]. Similarly, during waterlogging conditions, NO influences both the morphological and physiological characteristics of maize seedlings such that it increases height, dry weight, and antioxidant activities while decreasing MDA content and the ion leakage ratio [148]. The reductive pathway of NO production is involved in maintaining leaf shape and size in plants by increasing the cell size, chlorophyll a/b contents, antioxidant enzymatic activity, homeostasis of ROS [149], and root elongation [131].
The mechanisms of hypoxia tolerance by NO are several. For example, NO improves H2S accumulation in maize seedling roots, which increases antioxidant defense, leading to the removal of excess ROS [146]. Moreover, during hypoxia and anoxia, NO is involved in ATP production through mitochondrial ETCs and the phytoglobin-NO cycle [16], thus increasing energy status. During hypoxia, NO production and the fine regulation of ROS and NO can slow down the respiration rate while preventing tissues from anoxia [53]. Nitric oxide could induce the expression of alternative oxidase (AOX) during various stress conditions [150], while its expression is associated with less superoxide generation and lipid peroxidation during O2 limitation conditions, while AOX also prevents nitro-oxidative stress during reoxygenation [151].
During plant–microbial symbiosis, the enzyme of nitrogen fixation, i.e., nitrogenase, is only stable and functional in O2-limited conditions [152]. In such symbiotic interaction, plant NR and mitochondrial ETCs are involved in NO production, while excess and low NO inhibit the nodule establishment [85], suggesting that NO should be regulated in the symbiotic relationship between plants and microbes. The nitrate-NO respiration process in root nodules of Medicago truncatula plays a role in the maintenance of the energy status required for nitrogen fixation [100].
Calcium ion reduces the level of ROS and increases the antioxidant enzymes in mitochondria during hypoxia by improving metabolism and ion transport in plants, thereby increasing hypoxia tolerance [153]. Similarly, exogenous calcium application can increase the biomass, net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and efficiency of photosystem II during hypoxia stress in plants [154]. NO can regulate Ca2+ in plant cells [155]. For example, plant cells treated with NO donors are reported to have a fast increase in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, which was strongly reduced when treated with NO scavengers [156]. The mechanism involved in this regulation of Ca2+ could be that NO can increase the free cytosolic Ca2+ concentration by activating plasma membrane Ca2+ channels and inducing plasma membrane depolarization [156]. However, a higher concentration of NO is also reported to inhibit the cytosolic Ca2+ in human cells [157], suggesting NO should be regulated for its beneficial role.
If a plant is exposed to O2 deficiency for a prolonged period, the ultimate fate of the plant will be death. So, the mechanisms that could improve the O2 status of waterlogged plants would only benefit the plant to survive, while NO formation is also highly beneficial for improving O2 status through various mechanisms. For example, adventitious root formation increases plant resistance to waterlogging by increasing the inward diffusion of O2 [20] or even participating in photosynthesis, thus improving O2 status [158], while NO is reported to play a role on its formation during waterlogging [20]. Similarly, aerotropic roots can be originated in lateral roots that emerge above the water surface if waterlogging lasts for a prolonged period [159], while NO generation through reductive pathways is involved in lateral root and seminal root elongation in plants [133] that could facilitate the O2 supply together with aerotropic roots. Aerenchyma formation allows O2 diffusion from aerated to waterlogged parts of plants, while NO also plays a role in aerenchyma formation in plants [27], thus improving the O2 status. Nitric oxide as well as ethylene are involved in programmed cell death and aerenchyma formation during O2-limitation conditions [27,160]. Nitric oxide formed through reductive pathways induces the expression of aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) synthase (ACS) and ACC oxidase (ACO) genes responsible for ethylene synthesis [27]. Recently, it has been reported that auxin is involved in ethylene-dependent aerenchyma formation such that the use of an auxin transport inhibitor abolished the arenchyma formation [160]. Meanwhile, during O2 limitation conditions, NO donors could induce the upregulation of the auxin transporter PIN2 gene [137], suggesting the diverse roles of NO in regulating aerenchyma formation in plants.

6. Adverse Effects of Nitric Oxide and Role of Nitric Oxide Scavenging on Hypoxia and Anoxia Tolerance

It is clear that NO, as the end product of the NO3-NO2-NO pathway, plays numerous beneficial roles during hypoxia and anoxia tolerance in plants. However, to be beneficial, the concentration of NO plays a critical role, while hypoxia and anoxia trigger NO production, which can be lethal to cells [105]. Some of the adverse effects of NO are summarized in Table 2. Moreover, oxidative stress caused by O2 limitation and the overproduction of NO during various stresses could damage major components of mitochondria [112,161] and inhibit antioxidants systems, thus accumulating ROS and RNS [22]. RNS, if accumulated more, could exacerbate more damage than ROS by triggering free radical peroxidation [162]. Increased RNS and ROS production could lead to retrograde signaling to the nucleus to regulate gene expressions [163]. Nitric oxide, through the formation of RNS, could lead to mutation, DNA damage, and cell death [161,164]. So, for the longer survival of a cell during hypoxia and anoxia, the NO produced RNS should be scavenged efficiently.
It is clear that NO scavengers work differently in plants. For example, the use of NO scavengers during low NO production have negative effects on plant growth [133], while during high NO production, the same NO scavengers have positive effects [166]. A similar role of NO has been reported in mammals [175]. Therefore, the optimum level of NO could be different during normal and stress conditions. As a higher amount of NO is formed through the reductive pathways during the O2 limitation condition, it would be beneficial that some amount of NO is scavenged from cells. For example, the scavenging of NO using NO scavengers during hypoxia preserves the function of mammals’ mitochondria [176]. There may be several pathways of NO scavenging mechanisms during O2-limited conditions, such as NO reduction to N2O [24,177] and the phytoglobin-NO cycle in plants [89].

6.1. Nitric Oxide Reduction to Nitrous Oxide

We found very little information available on the role of N2O in plants (Table 3), which could be due to the fact that N2O is less reactive to a biological system and is readily emitted to the atmosphere. NO formation in plants is always suspected to be underestimated [16], which could be due to that fact that NO is not simultaneously measured with N2O. Nitric oxide can inhibit the activity of CcO either reversibly or irreversibly, such that a lower level of NO can reversibly inhibit respiration, while a higher level of NO irreversibly inhibits it due to RNS formation [26]. This reversible and irreversible inhibition of CcO could be linked to NO reduction to N2O, as N2O is also involved in the reversible and partial inhibition of respiration at the site of CcO [178,179]. Moreover, CcO is known to reduce NO to N2O when both NO and O2 levels are low, while a higher level of NO can inhibit the NO reduction process [180]. N2O is a relatively inert gaseous molecule, and its formation and release to the atmosphere could significantly reduce the accumulation of RNS, while the inhibition of NO reduction to N2O could increase the level of RNS that could irreversibly inhibit CcO. Therefore, the dose-dependent effects of NO donors could be linked to NO reduction to N2O, as the optimum NO level could favor N2O formation [180], while at a higher dose of NO donor, NO could be high, thus favoring peroxynitirte formation, and thus exerting negative effects. The use of tungsten as an NR inhibitor was reported to inhibit N2O formation in plants [181], while NR inhibition challenged the plants’ survival, as described in the above section, which further supports the concept that N2O formation also could play a role in plants’ survival strategies. Moreover, recent results suggest that NR plays critical role in NO-mediated N2O formation in microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [182]. Both NO [183] and N2O [184] can increase the activities of phenylalanine ammonialyase, cinnamate-4-hydroxylase, and 4-coumaroyl-CoA ligase during pathogen attack in plants while increasing total phenolic, flavonoid, and lignin content. Similarly, both NO and N2O are reported to slow down fruit ripening by lowering ethylene synthesis during post-harvest storage [185,186], while the role of NO depends on the optimum dose [186], suggesting that NO could be reduced to N2O at the optimum dose, as discussed earlier. Therefore, the similar roles of both NO and N2O observed in plants could be due to NO reduction to N2O, which need further research as, to date, there is no research measuring both NO and N2O simultaneously. Interestingly, not only during O2 limitation [187,188] but also during UV stress, plants are reported to emit more N2O [189], suggesting this NO reduction to N2O could operate during other stresses too. Moreover, the intact chloroplast of wheat was reported to produce N2O when supplied with NO2 [190], which could be due to the possible reduction of NO2 to NO and NO to N2O, thus reducing the toxicity of NO and protecting the chloroplast components as in mitochondria. A field study showed a positive relationship between plant N2O emissions and photosynthetically active radiation [191], supporting the concept of N2O production in chloroplasts, too. However, to date, enzymes involved in NO reduction to N2O in the chloroplast are not clear, which need further research.
Microbial denitrification affects the pH by the production of OH ions [195]. Moreover, NO3 and NO2 supplementation in plants during hypoxia and anoxia has been reported to improve cytoplasmic acidification as well as reduce the content of ethanol, which could be toxic if accumulated in higher amounts, as reported in previous sections. The mechanism behind the reduction in ethanol and lactate content and improved cytoplasmic acidification by NO3 and NO2 could be due to ethanol and lactate acting as electron donors during denitrification in plants and the release of OH ions during the proposed denitrification process in plants, as shown in Equation (1) [195].
5C2H5OH + 12NO3 → 6N2 + 10CO2 + 9H2O + 12OH
Many field-based studies have reported a positive relationship between plant N2O emission and respiration rate [187,191]. This positive relation could be explained by Equation (1), as denitrification (N2O or N2 or both) with a carbon source could release CO2, resulting in the observed positive relationship between N2O emissions and respiration rate in plants. A similar observation has been reported in microbial denitrification between N2O and CO2 emissions [196]. Nitric oxide reductase (Nor) in denitrifying bacteria uses NADH as a reductase, while N2O is an intermediate [70]. Similarly, in the case of plant mitochondria, the addition of NADH during hypoxia can increase the NO scavenging rate [197], suggesting NO is reduced to N2O in a similar way to bacterial denitrification. As N2O is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming and ozone depletion [177,198,199,200,201], understanding its formation in plants is essential. Moreover, there exist uncertainties in estimating the global N2O budget [187], which could be due to the fact that sources of N2O are not well recognized [24,187]. For example, mainly soil-microorganisms and fungi are considered as its natural sources [198], while plants are considered as a medium to transport soil-microorganisms that produce N2O [202]. However, in a natural environment, plant roots may face O2 deficiency which favors reductive pathways of NO formation along with NO reduction to N2O. This is supported by the fact that plants are natural sources of both NO [203] and N2O [187] in field conditions too. Moreover, the excessive use of N fertilizer along with waterlogging caused by heavy rainfall events under the climate change scenario could trigger both NO and N2O production in plants, thus increasing their atmospheric concentration.

6.2. Phytoglobin-NO Cycle

As stated in the above sections, the expression of Pgbs is beneficial for plants during O2-limited conditions, which is due to the NO scavenging mechanism. For example, during the germination of barley seeds, the scavenging of NO through the overexpression of Pgbs resulted in a higher germination rate, protein content, and ATP/ADP ratios and a lower rate of fermentation, the S-nitrosylation of proteins and S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) [89,204]. These lower levels of fermentation, S-nitrosylation of protein, and GSNO level in the phytoglobin-overexpressing line could indicate that NO scavenging through Pgbs results in lower stress as it is a marker of stress. However, NO scavenged through Pgbs could be partially operated. In a low NO concentration, NO3 formed in a similar amount to NO, while in a high NO concentration, there was no increase in NO3 [205], suggesting that the phytoglobin-NO cycle could be a limiting factor for a higher level of NO formed during O2 deficiency. This is further supported by the fact that during hypoxia, about 80% of NO is scavenged by mitochondria itself [206], while Pgbs are present in the cytoplasm, chloroplast, and nucleus [207]. In this case, the recently proposed denitrification ability in plants could be another mechanism of NO scavenging [24], as laboratory as well as field-based studies have reported a significant amount of N2O formation in plants [187,208]. However, the proposed denitrification mechanism would also be a limiting factor during anoxia or during high NO production conditions [180]. Another topic of interest would be that the NO scavenging mechanisms would operate simultaneously or one after another so that plants would benefit more from the mechanisms during O2 deficiency. For example, the scavenging of NO through Pgbs can reduce S-nitrosylation in plants [89]. Phytoglobin expression in algae has been involved in the synthesis of not only NO but also N2O [209]. Although there is no direct evidence that Pgbs could reduce NO to N2O, it could play a role in the phytoglobin-NO respiration cycle. The role of Pgbs could be due to its role of oxidizing NO to NO3 during O2-limitation conditions, as NO3 is the precursor of N2O formation in plants [24]. Moreover, phytoglobin-overexpressing mutants could maintain a lower level of NO that can facilitate NO reduction to N2O during hypoxia. When NO is reduced to N2O, N2O is released to the atmosphere, suggesting a beneficial way of scavenging NO from the plant system, although N is lost from plants.

7. Nitric-Oxide-Mediated Post-Translational Modifications and Their Roles during Hypoxia and Anoxia

Recent research suggests that NO-mediated post-translational modifications are less reported in plants during O2-limitation conditions [210], which could be due to the fact that NO is reduced to N2O and emitted to the atmosphere. This could be supported by the fact that plants emit very high N2O levels during waterlogging conditions, which are even more than those in soil [202], while it has been recently suggested that the N2O emitted from plants even in field conditions is produced in plant cells through NO reduction [187]. However, during complete anoxic conditions, this NO reduction to N2O would be inhibited [180]. Moreover, the NO-scavenging capacity of Pgbs would not operate during complete anoxia [211], while they contribute to produce NO [212], thus, again, increasing the level of NO, and thus promoting nitro-oxidative stress and inducing NO-mediated post-translational modification in plants (Figure 2). Some of the NO-mediated post-translational modifications and their roles in plants during O2-limited conditions are discussed in the section below.

7.1. Protein Tyrosine Nitration (PTN)

Tyrosine nitration is the addition of a nitro group at the orthro position of the phenolic hydroxyl group of tyrosine producing 3-nitrotrysoine [213,214]. OONO can react with CO2 to give peroxynitous acid or ONOOCO2 which decomposes to carbonate radical and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) [215], which could be a major pathway of tyrosine nitration during O2 deficiency, rather than being NO2- and O2-mediated. Several plant proteins are a target of tyrosine nitration, which mostly decreases their activities [215,216]. In root nodules, higher NO production was correlated with the PTN of glutamine synthetase, thus decreasing its activity [217]. As PTN is a marker of nitrosative stress, we could conclude that effective NO scavenging through Pgbs and N2O formation pathways would reduce the PTN, thus enhancing the plants’ survival. For example, a plant inoculated with a bacterial strain that could detoxify the NO (flavohemoglobin) was reported to have the reduced PTN of plant protein [217].

7.2. S-Nitrosylation

S-nitrosylation needs a preliminary reaction of NO with O2 via the formation of higher nitrogen oxides such as N2O3 [213]. However, when the NO concentration is more than O2, the reaction between these two favors N2O3 formation, thus leading to S-nitrosylation [218]. Hypoxia-related NO production is reported for protein’s S-nitrosylation [219]. Several plant proteins are targets of S-nitrosylation and are inhibited [213,220,221], while some could lead to an increase in resistance to oxidative stress [221]. Evidence suggests that Pgbs, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and CcO are the targets of S-nitrosylation [222]. During hypoxia, NO is involved in S-nitrosylation, targeting GSNO reductase for selective autophagy [223]. NO can be converted to GSNO by GSH, while GSNOR converts GSNO to glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and ammonia (NH3). Moreover, the induction of GSNOR enzyme under anoxic conditions, more expressed in Pgb knockdown plants [89], can be simultaneously linked to these NO-scavenging mechanisms and would depend on the NO concentration, as the level of nitrosylation is only partially controlled by Pgb and GSNO reductase [89]. NO can deplete GSH content in a dose-dependent manner in biological systems [162], thus reducing the antioxidants’ availability. Moreover, peroxiredoxins (Prx), which play an important role in combating ROS and ONOO reductase activity, were inhibited through S-nitrosylation in plants exposed to high NO which was produced during different stress conditions [31]. As GSNO is a physiological NO donor, it also triggers nitrosative stress in higher concentrations [224], thus increasing damage in the plant system.

7.3. Metal Nitrosylation

Nitric oxide forms metal-containing proteins by binding with the metal centers of metalloprotein, known as metal nitrosylation [225]. The formation of the metal–nitrosyl complex through the metal nitrosylation process can induce conformational changes in the target proteins, impacting their activity [226]. Metal nitrosylation can prevent ROS production by blocking the peroxidation of metals [221]. However, in the plant system, hemoglobin, CcO, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and cytosolic and mitochondrial aconitases are reported to be inhibited through metal nitrosylation [227], thus, again, affecting plants. Therefore, an optimum level of NO is critical in reducing the negative effects.

8. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

All of this evidence suggests that the reductive pathways of NO formation are highly beneficial, while these pathways are triggered during O2 limitation, which could also lead to NO toxicity. Therefore, effective NO scavenging mechanisms could help plants survive for a longer duration during O2 deficiency. However, considering NO scavenging mechanisms during the O2-limitation conditions are defense mechanisms, the higher the stress of O2 limitation, the more nitro-oxidative stress there is in plants. So, we could conclude that if this reductive pathway of NO formation and scavenging is finely tuned, plants could be benefited in numerous ways. However, major scavenging systems could be limiting factors which could explain why more NO production through the reductive pathways leads to plant death in the model hypothesized in Figure 2. Although there has been much advancement in understanding the reductive pathways of NO formation, we suggest that scavenging mechanisms such as NO reduction to N2O in plants and their role in reducing NO toxicity is not clear. The denitrification process, which is a major pathway of nitrogen cycling in an ecosystem, is considered to be present only in micro-organisms and some fungi, while we suggest that in plants, denitrification is involved in reducing NO toxicity, thus enhancing plants’ survival in hypoxic and anoxic environments. Therefore, future research could focus on the reductive pathways of NO along with N2O formation while exploring the role of N2O formation in reducing nitro-oxidative stress. Moreover, possible sites of N2O formation in plant cells need further investigation. Evidence suggests that not only during O2 limitation conditions but also during other stresses, plants could emit more N2O through the reductive pathways of NO formation, which needs further research. As N2O is a potent greenhouse gas, understanding its formation in plants would also help in addressing the current uncertainties in its global budget and implementing mitigation strategies for its global warming effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T., B.L. and C.H.; writing the draft manuscript, A.T.; reviewing and editing the manuscript, W.D., M.H., B.L. and C.H.; supervision, B.L. and C.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by funding from the National Key Research and Development Program of China, (2021YFD1901104) and (2021YFD1700901), and the Key R&D Program of Hebei Province (No. 21323601D, 19227312D).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

A.T. is thankful to China Postdoctoral Science Foundation for support. We are thankful to Fiston Bizimana for his critical reading and comments on the draft manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare that we do not have competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced this work.

References

  1. Zhou, W.; Chen, F.; Meng, Y.; Chandrasekaran, U.; Luo, X.; Yang, W.; Shu, K. Plant waterlogging/flooding stress responses: From seed germination to maturation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 148, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Greenway, H.; Armstrong, W. Energy-crises in well-aerated and anoxic tissue: Does tolerance require the same specific proteins and energy-efficient transport? Funct. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 877–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Valeri, M.C.; Novi, G.; Weits, D.A.; Mensuali, A.; Perata, P.; Loreti, E. Botrytis cinerea induces local hypoxia in Arabidopsis leaves. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Serraj, R.; Roy, G.; Drevon, J.J. Salt stress induces a decrease in the oxygen uptake of soybean nodules and in their permeability to oxygen diffusion. Physiol. Plant. 1994, 91, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aridhi, F.; Sghaier, H.; Gaitanaros, A.; Khadri, A.; Aschi-Smiti, S.; Brouquisse, R. Nitric oxide production is involved in maintaining energy state in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) nodulated roots under both salinity and flooding. Planta 2020, 252, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Weits, D.A.; van Dongen, J.T.; Licausi, F. Molecular oxygen as a signaling component in plant development. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Limami, A.M.; Diab, H.; Lothier, J. Nitrogen metabolism in plants under low oxygen stress. Planta 2014, 239, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pugh, R.; Witty, J.F.; Mytton, L.R.; Minchin, F.R. The effect of waterlogging on nitrogen fixation and nodule morphology in soil-grown white clover (Trifolium repens L.). J. Exp. Bot. 1995, 46, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Steffens, D.; Hutsch, B.W.; Eschholz, T.; Losak, T.; Schubert, S. Waterlogging may inhibit plant growth primarily by nutrient deficiency rather than nutrient toxicity. Plant Soil Environ. 2005, 51, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oliveira, H.C.; Freschi, L.; Sodek, L. Nitrogen metabolism and translocation in soybean plants subjected to root oxygen deficiency. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 66, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Posso, D.A.; Borella, J.; Reissig, G.N.; Bacarin, M.A. Root flooding-induced changes in the dynamic dissipation of the photosynthetic energy of common bean plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shi, K.; Ding, X.-T.; Dong, D.-K.; Zhou, Y.-H.; Yu, J.Q. Putrescine enhancement of tolerance to root-zone hypoxia in Cucumis sativus: A role for increased nitrate reduction. Funct. Plant Biol. 2008, 35, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kapoor, D.; Singh, S.; Kumar, V.; Romero, R.; Prasad, R.; Singh, J. Antioxidant enzymes regulation in plants in reference to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). Plant Gene 2019, 19, 100182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Greenway, H.; Gibbs, J. Mechanisms of anoxia tolerance in plants. II. Energy requirements for maintenance and energy distribution to essential processes. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 999–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Yasuda, Y.; Sasaki, R. Soluble sugar availability of aerobically germinated barley, oat and rice coleoptiles in anoxia. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 1571–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Igamberdiev, A.U.; Hill, R.D. Nitrate, NO and haemoglobin in plant adaptation to hypoxia: An alternative to classic fermentation pathways. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 2473–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Evans, D.E. Aerenchyma formation. New Phytol. 2004, 161, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sauter, M. Root responses to flooding. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yamauchi, T.; Tanaka, A.; Mori, H.; Takamure, I.; Kato, K.; Nakazono, M. Ethylene-dependent aerenchyma formation in adventitious roots is regulated differently in rice and maize. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 2145–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, T.; Yuan, F.; Song, J.; Wang, B. Nitric oxide participates in waterlogging tolerance through enhanced adventitious root formation in the euhalophyte Suaeda salsa. Funct. Plant Biol. 2016, 43, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Posso, D.A.; Borella, J.; Reissig, G.N.; do Amarante, L.; Bacarin, M.A. Nitrate-mediated maintenance of photosynthetic process by modulating hypoxic metabolism of common bean plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2020, 42, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Groß, F.; Durner, J.; Gaupels, F. Nitric oxide, antioxidants and prooxidants in plant defence responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gupta, K.J.; Mur, L.A.; Wany, A.; Kumari, A.; Fernie, A.R.; Ratcliffe, R.G. The role of nitrite and nitric oxide under low oxygen conditions in plants. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Timilsina, A.; Zhang, C.; Pandey, B.; Bizimana, F.; Dong, W.; Hu, C. Potential pathway of nitrous oxide formation in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Corpas, F.J.; Barroso, J.B. Nitro-oxidative stress vs oxidative or nitrosative stress in higher plants. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 633–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Poderoso, J.J.; Helfenberger, K.; Poderoso, C. The effect of nitric oxide on mitochondrial respiration. Nitric Oxide 2019, 88, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wany, A.; Kumari, A.; Gupta, K.J. Nitric oxide is essential for the development of aerenchyma in wheat roots under hypoxic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 3002–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lindermayr, C.; Saalbach, G.; Bahnweg, G.; Durner, J. Differential inhibition of Arabidopsis methionine adenosyltransferases by protein S-nitrosylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 4285–4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bai, T.; Li, C.; Ma, F.; Shu, H.; Han, M. Exogenous salicylic acid alleviates growth inhibition and oxidative stress induced by hypoxia stress in Malus robusta Rehd. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 28, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pande, A.; Mun, B.G.; Rahim, W.; Khan, M.; Lee, D.S.; Lee, G.M.; Al Azzawi, T.N.I.; Hussain, A.; Kim, C.K.; Yun, B.W. Phytohormonal Regulation through Protein S-Nitrosylation under Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 865542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Astier, J.; Kulik, A.; Koen, E.; Besson-Bard, A.; Bourque, S.; Jeandroz, S.; Lamotte, O.; Wendehenne, D. Protein S-nitrosylation: What’s going on in plants? Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 1101–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gupta, K.J.; Kaladhar, V.C.; Fitzpatrick, T.B.; Fernie, A.R.; Møller, I.M.; Loake, G.J. Nitric oxide regulation of plant metabolism. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 228–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gupta, K.J.; Fernie, A.R.; Kaiser, W.M.; van Dongen, J.T. On the origins of nitric oxide. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumari, A.; Pathak, P.K.; Bulle, M.; Igamberdiev, A.U.; Gupta, K.J. Alternative oxidase is an important player in the regulation of nitric oxide levels under normoxic and hypoxic conditions in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4345–4354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chamizo-Ampudia, A.; Sanz-Luque, E.; Llamas, Á.; Ocaña-Calahorro, F.; Mariscal, V.; Carreras, A.; Barroso, J.B.; Galván, A.; Fernández, E. A dual system formed by the ARC and NR molybdoenzymes mediates nitrite-dependent NO production in Chlamydomonas. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 2097–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Valderrama, R.; Corpas, F.J.; Carreras, A.; Fernández-Ocaña, A.; Chaki, M.; Luque, F.; Barroso, J.B. Nitrosative stress in plants. Febs Lett. 2007, 581, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reda, M.; Golicka, A.; Kabała, K.; Janicka, M. Involvement of NR and PM-NR in NO biosynthesis in cucumber plants subjected to salt stress. Plant Sci. 2018, 267, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, X.; Stettmaier, K.; Michel, C.; Hutzler, P.; Mueller, M.J.; Durner, J. Nitric oxide is induced by wounding and influences jasmonic acid signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2004, 218, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, M.G.; Chen, L.; Zhang, L.L.; Zhang, W.H. Nitric reductase-dependent nitric oxide production is involved in cold acclimation and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Oliveira, H.C.; Saviani, E.E.; Oliveira, J.F.; Salgado, I. Nitrate reductase-dependent nitric oxide synthesis in the defense response of Arabidopsis thaliana against Pseudomonas syringae. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2010, 35, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, M.; Dong, J.-F.; Jin, H.-H.; Sun, L.-N.; Xu, M.-J. Ultraviolet-B-induced flavonoid accumulation in Betula pendula leaves is dependent upon nitrate reductase-mediated nitric oxide signaling. Tree Physiol. 2011, 31, 798–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Monreal, J.A.; Arias-Baldrich, C.; Tossi, V.; Feria, A.B.; Rubio-Casal, A.; García-Mata, C.; García-Mauriño, S. Nitric oxide regulation of leaf phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase-kinase activity: Implication in sorghum responses to salinity. Planta 2013, 238, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pissolato, M.D.; Silveira, N.M.; Prataviera, P.J.C.; Machado, E.C.; Seabra, A.B.; Pelegrino, M.T.; Sodek, L.; Ribeiro, R.V. Enhanced nitric oxide synthesis through nitrate supply improves drought tolerance of sugarcane plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jasid, S.; Simontacchi, M.; Bartoli, C.G.; Puntarulo, S. Chloroplasts as a nitric oxide cellular source. Effect of reactive nitrogen species on chloroplastic lipids and proteins. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 1246–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Singh, I.N.; Sullivan, P.G.; Hall, E.D. Peroxynitrite-mediated oxidative damage to brain mitochondria: Protective effects of peroxynitrite scavengers. J. Neurosci. Res. 2007, 85, 2216–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhao, L.; Liu, F.; Crawford, N.M.; Wang, Y. Molecular regulation of nitrate responses in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fan, X.; Naz, M.; Fan, X.; Xuan, W.; Miller, A.J.; Xu, G. Plant nitrate transporters: From gene function to application. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2463–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Brandão, A.D.; Sodek, L. Nitrate uptake and metabolism by roots of soybean plants under oxygen deficiency. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 21, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  49. Oliveira, H.C.; Sodek, L. Effect of oxygen deficiency on nitrogen assimilation and amino acid metabolism of soybean root segments. Amino Acids 2013, 44, 743–755. [Google Scholar]
  50. De Carvalho, P.A.; de Oliveira, L.E.M.; Sodek, L.; de Carvalho, J.N. Nitrogen metabolism in the roots of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) plants supplied with nitrate or ammonium as nitrogen source during hypoxia. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2015, 9, 1278. [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu, B.; Rennenberg, H.; Kreuzwieser, J. Hypoxia affects nitrogen uptake and distribution in young poplar (Populus canescens) trees. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Botrel, A.; Magné, C.; Kaiser, W.M. Nitrate reduction, nitrite reduction and ammonium assimilation in barley roots in response to anoxia. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1996, 34, 645–652. [Google Scholar]
  53. Benamar, A.; Rolletschek, H.; Borisjuk, L.; Avelange-Macherel, M.H.; Curien, G.; Mostefai, H.A.; Andriantsitohaina, R.; Macherel, D. Nitrite-nitric oxide control of mitochondrial respiration at the frontier of anoxia. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenerg. 2008, 1777, 1268–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Borisjuk, L.; Rolletschek, H. The oxygen status of the developing seed. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pandey, S.; Kumari, A.; Shree, M.; Kumar, V.; Singh, P.; Bharadwaj, C.; Loake, G.J.; Parida, S.K.; Masakapalli, S.K.; Gupta, K.J.; et al. Nitric oxide accelerates germination via the regulation of respiration in chickpea. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4539–4555. [Google Scholar]
  56. Borisjuk, L.; Macherel, D.; Benamar, A.; Wobus, U.; Rolletschek, H. Low oxygen sensing and balancing in plant seeds: A role for nitric oxide. New Phytol. 2007, 176, 813–823. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hendricks, S.B.; Taylorson, R.B. Promotion of seed germination by nitrates and cyanides. Nature 1972, 237, 169–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Batak, I.; Devic, M.; Gibal, Z.; Grubišic, D.; Poff, K.L.; Konjevic, R. The effects of potassium nitrate and NO-donors on phytochrome A-and phytochrome B-specific induced germination of Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Seed Sci. Res. 2002, 12, 253. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lara, T.S.; Lira, J.M.S.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Rakocevi, M.; Alvarenga, A.A. Potassium nitrate priming affects the activity of nitrate reductase and antioxidant enzymes in tomato germination. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 6, 72. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vidal, E.A.; Alvarez, J.M.; Araus, V.; Riveras, E.; Brooks, M.D.; Krouk, G.; Ruffel, S.; Lejay, L.; Crawford, N.M.; Coruzzi, G.M.; et al. Nitrate in 2020: Thirty years from transport to signaling networks. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 2094–2119. [Google Scholar]
  61. Deng, Z.; Song, S. Sodium nitroprusside, ferricyanide, nitrite and nitrate decrease the thermo-dormancy of lettuce seed germination in a nitric oxide-dependent manner in light. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2012, 78, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dong, T.; Tong, J.; Xiao, L.; Cheng, H.; Song, S. Nitrate, abscisic acid and gibberellin interactions on the thermoinhibition of lettuce seed germination. Plant Growth Regul. 2012, 66, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nawaz, F.; Naeem, M.; Akram, A.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Ahmad, K.S.; Zulfiqar, B.; Sardar, H.; Shabbir, R.N.; Majeed, S.; Shehzad, M.A.; et al. Seed priming with KNO3-mediates biochemical processes to inhibit lead toxicity in maize (Zea mays L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 4780–4789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ikeya, S.; Aoyanagi, T.; Ishizuka, I.; Takeuchi, A.; Kozaki, A. Nitrate promotes germination under inhibition by NaCl or high concentration of glucose. Plants 2020, 9, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kumar, V.; Dwivedi, P.; Kumar, P.; Singh, B.N.; Pandey, D.K.; Kumar, V.; Bose, B. Mitigation of heat stress responses in crops using nitrate primed seeds. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 140, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kennedy, R.A.; Rumpho, M.E.; Vanderzee, D. Germination of Echinochloa crus-galli (barnyard grass) seeds under anaerobic conditions: Respiration and response to metabolic inhibitors. Plant Physiol. 1983, 72, 787–794. [Google Scholar]
  67. Arc, E.; Galland, M.; Godin, B.; Cueff, G.; Rajjou, L. Nitric oxide implication in the control of seed dormancy and germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kemp, K.; Small, J.C. Nitrate and nitrate reductase in Erythrina caffra seeds: Enhancement of induction by anoxia and possible role in germination. Planta 1993, 189, 298–300. [Google Scholar]
  69. Polyakova, L.I.; Vartapetian, B.B. Exogenous nitrate as a terminal acceptor of electrons in rice (Oryza sativa) coleoptiles and wheat (Triticum aestivum) roots under strict anoxia. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 50, 808–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, J.; Strous, M. Denitrification and aerobic respiration, hybrid electron transport chains and co-evolution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 2013, 1827, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Board, J.E. Waterlogging effects on plant nutrient concentrations in soybean. J. Plant Nutr. 2008, 31, 828–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ashraf, M.; Rehman, H. Mineral nutrient status of corn in relation to nitrate and long-term waterlogging. J. Plant Nutr. 1999, 22, 1253–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fan, T.W.; Higashi, R.M.; Lane, A.N. An in vivo 1H and 31P NMR investigation of the effect of nitrate on hypoxic metabolism in maize roots. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1988, 266, 592–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Libourel, I.G.L.; Van Bodegom, P.M.; Fricker, M.D.; Ratcliffe, R.G. Nitrite reduces cytoplasmic acidosis under anoxia. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 1710–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Da-Silva, C.J.; do Amarante, L. Short-term nitrate supply decreases fermentation and oxidative stress caused by waterlogging in soybean plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 176, 104078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Defense in Plants under Abiotic Stress: Revisiting the Crucial Role of a Universal Defense Regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Da-Silva, C.J.; Shimoia, E.P.; Posso, D.A.; Cardoso, A.A.; Batz, T.A.; Oliveira, A.C.B.; do Amarante, L. Nitrate nutrition increases foliar levels of nitric oxide and waterlogging tolerance in soybean. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2021, 43, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Borella, J.; Becker, R.; Lima, M.C.; Oliveira, D.D.S.C.D.; Braga, E.J.B.; Oliveira, A.C.B.D.; Amarante, L.D. Nitrogen source influences the antioxidative system of soybean plants under hypoxia and re-oxygenation. Sci. Agric. 2019, 76, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Naz, S.; Shen, Q.; Lwalaba, J.L.W.; Zhang, G. Genotypic Difference in the Responses to Nitrogen Fertilizer Form in Tibetan Wild and Cultivated Barley. Plants 2021, 10, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nakamura, M.; Noguchi, K. Tolerant mechanisms to O2 deficiency under submergence conditions in plants. J. Plant Res. 2020, 133, 343–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Kaur, K.; Goyal, K.; Arora, K.; Kaur, G. Genotypic variations in nitrate respiration along with potassium nitrate treatment-accountable for water logging tolerance in maize. Biologia 2021, 76, 1651–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bacanamwo, M.; Purcell, L.C. Soybean dry matter and N accumulation responses to flooding stress, N sources and hypoxia. J. Exp. Bot. 1999, 50, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Berger, A.; Boscari, A.; Horta Araújo, N.; Maucourt, M.; Hanchi, M.; Bernillon, S.; Rolin, D.; Puppo, A.; Brouquisse, R. Plant nitrate reductases regulate nitric oxide production and nitrogen-fixing metabolism during the Medicago truncatulaSinorhizobium meliloti symbiosis. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Berger, A.; Guinand, S.; Boscari, A.; Puppo, A.; Brouquisse, R. Medicago truncatula Phytoglobin 1.1 controls symbiotic nodulation and nitrogen fixation via the regulation of nitric oxide concentration. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Berger, A.; Boscari, A.; Puppo, A.; Brouquisse, R. Nitrate reductases and hemoglobins control nitrogen-fixing symbiosis by regulating nitric oxide accumulation. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 873–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Youssef, M.S.; Mira, M.M.; Renault, S.; Hill, R.D.; Stasolla, C. Phytoglobin expression influences soil flooding response of corn plants. Ann. Bot. 2016, 118, 919–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wany, A.; Gupta, A.K.; Kumari, A.; Mishra, S.; Singh, N.; Pandey, S.; Vanvari, R.; Igamberdiev, A.U.; Fernie, A.R.; Gupta, K.J. Nitrate nutrition influences multiple factors in order to increase energy efficiency under hypoxia in Arabidopsis. Ann. Bot. 2018, 123, 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cochrane, D.W.; Shah, J.K.; Hebelstrup, K.H.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Expression of phytoglobin affects nitric oxide metabolism and energy state of barley plants exposed to anoxia. Plant Sci. 2017, 265, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Igamberdiev, A.U.; Ratcliffe, R.G.; Gupta, K.J. Plant mitochondria: Source and target for nitric oxide. Mitochondrion 2014, 19, 329–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hartman, S.; Sasidharan, R.; Voesenek, L.A. The role of ethylene in metabolic acclimations to low oxygen. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Hartman, S.; Liu, Z.; Van Veen, H.; Vicente, J.; Reinen, E.; Martopawiro, S.; Voesenek, L.A. Ethylene-mediated nitric oxide depletion pre-adapts plants to hypoxia stress. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Moore, M.; Gossmann, N.; Dietz, K.J. Redox regulation of cytosolic translation in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Stoimenova, M.; Libourel, I.G.L.; Ratcliffe, R.G.; Kaiser, W.M. The role of nitrate reduction in the anoxic metabolism of roots II. Anoxic metabolism of tobacco roots with or without nitrate reductase activity. Plant Soil 2003, 253, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Horchani, F.; Aschi-Smiti, S.; Brouquisse, R. Involvement of nitrate reduction in the tolerance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants to prolonged root hypoxia. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2010, 32, 1113–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Shingaki-Wells, R.; Millar, A.H.; Whelan, J.; Narsai, R. What happens to plant mitochondria under low oxygen? An omics review of the responses to low oxygen and reoxygenation. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 2260–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Vartapetian, B.B.; Polyakova, L.I. Protective effect of exogenous nitrate on the mitochondrial ultrastructure of Oryza sativa coleoptiles under strict anoxia. Protoplasma 1999, 206, 163–167. [Google Scholar]
  98. Larsen, F.J.; Schiffer, T.A.; Borniquel, S.; Sahlin, K.; Ekblom, B.; Lundberg, J.O.; Weitzberg, E. Dietary inorganic nitrate improves mitochondrial efficiency in humans. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Allègre, A.; Silvestre, J.; Morard, P.; Kallerhoff, J.; Pinelli, E. Nitrate reductase regulation in tomato roots by exogenous nitrate: A possible role in tolerance to long-term root anoxia. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 2625–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Horchani, F.; Prévot, M.; Boscari, A.; Evangelisti, E.; Meilhoc, E.; Bruand, C.; Raymond, P.; Boncompagni, E.; Aschi-Smiti, S.; Puppo, A.; et al. Both plant and bacterial nitrate reductases contribute to nitric oxide production in Medicago truncatula nitrogen-fixing nodules. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 1023–1036. [Google Scholar]
  101. Xu, L.; Pan, R.; Zhang, W. Membrane lipids are involved in plant response to oxygen deprivation. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1771938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Oberson, J.; Pavelic, D.; Braendle, R.; Rawyler, A. Nitrate increases membrane stability of potato cells under anoxia. J. Plant Physiol. 1999, 155, 792–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Guo, S.R.; Nada, K.; Tachibana, S. A role for nitrate reductase in the high tolerance of cucumber seedlings to root-zone hypoxia. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1998, 67, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chamizo-Ampudia, A.; Sanz-Luque, E.; Llamas, A.; Galvan, A.; Fernandez, E. Nitrate reductase regulates plant nitric oxide homeostasis. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Brown, G.C.; Borutaite, V. Nitric oxide inhibition of mitochondrial respiration and its role in cell death. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2002, 33, 1440–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Costa-Broseta, Á.; Castillo, M.; León, J. Post-translational modifications of nitrate reductases autoregulates nitric oxide biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zheng, P.; Bai, X.; Long, J.; Li, K.; Xu, H. Nitric oxide enhances the nitrate stress tolerance of spinach by scavenging ROS and RNS. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 213, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gupta, K.J.; Igamberdiev, A.U. The anoxic plant mitochondrion as a nitrite: NO reductase. Mitochondrion 2011, 11, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bethke, P.C.; Libourel, I.G.; Reinöhl, V.; Jones, R.L. Sodium nitroprusside, cyanide, nitrite, and nitrate break Arabidopsis seed dormancy in a nitric oxide-dependent manner. Planta 2006, 223, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Oliveira, H.C.; Salgado, I.; Sodek, L. Involvement of nitrite in the nitrate-mediated modulation of fermentative metabolism and nitric oxide production of soybean roots during hypoxia. Planta 2013, 237, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gupta, K.J.; Lee, C.P.; Ratcliffe, R.G. Nitrite protects mitochondrial structure and function under hypoxia. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Srinivasan, S.; Avadhani, N.G. Cytochrome c oxidase dysfunction in oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 1252–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lundberg, J.O.; Weitzberg, E.; Gladwin, M.T. The nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Fago, A.; Jensen, F.B. Hypoxia tolerance, nitric oxide, and nitrite: Lessons from extreme animals. Physiology 2015, 30, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Ansari, F.A.; Ali, S.N.; Arif, H.; Khan, A.A.; Mahmood, R. Acute oral dose of sodium nitrite induces redox imbalance, DNA damage, metabolic and histological changes in rat intestine. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Guo, X.-R.; Chang, B.-W.; Zu, Y.-G.; Tang, Z.-H. The impacts of increased nitrate supply on Catharanthus roseus growth and alkaloid accumulations under ultraviolet-B stress. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 640–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhou, J.; Wang, M.; Sun, Y.; Gu, Z.; Wang, R.; Saydin, A.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. Nitrate increased cucumber tolerance to Fusarium wilt by regulating fungal toxin production and distribution. Toxins 2017, 9, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Stoimenova, M.; Igamberdiev, A.U.; Gupta, K.J.; Hill, R.D. Nitrite-driven anaerobic ATP synthesis in barley and rice root mitochondria. Planta 2007, 226, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Floryszak-Wieczorek, J.; Arasimowicz-Jelonek, M.; Izbiańska, K. The combined nitrate reductase and nitrite-dependent route of NO synthesis in potato immunity to Phytophthora infestans. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 108, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Wang, Y.; Yu, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, Z.; Eissa, M.A. Mechanisms of Nitric Oxide in the Regulation of Chilling Stress Tolerance in Camellia sinensis. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Guo, X.; Huang, D.; Wen, S.; Bai, Y.; Zhu, S.; Feng, J. Nitric Oxide Regulates Mitochondrial Fatty Acids and Promotes CBF Expression of Peach Fruit during Cold Storage. Phyton 2022, 91, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lai, T.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Qin, G.; Tian, S. Defense responses of tomato fruit to exogenous nitric oxide during postharvest storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 62, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wang, H.-H.; Huang, J.-J.; Bi, Y.-R. Nitrate reductase-dependent nitric oxide production is involved in aluminum tolerance in red kidney bean roots. Plant Sci. 2010, 179, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wang, H.; Hou, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Liang, W. Nitric oxide-mediated cytosolic glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase is involved in aluminum toxicity of soybean under high aluminum concentration. Plant Soil 2017, 416, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hu, Y.; You, J.; Liang, X. Nitrate reductase-mediated nitric oxide production is involved in copper tolerance in shoots of hulless barley. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Khan, M.N.; Alamri, S.; Al-Amri, A.A.; Alsubaie, Q.D.; Al-Munqedi, B.; Ali, H.M.; Siddiqui, M.H. Effect of nitric oxide on seed germination and seedling development of tomato under chromium toxicity. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 40, 2358–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhao, G.; Zhao, Y.; Lou, W.; Su, J.; Wei, S.; Yang, X.; Shen, W. Nitrate reductase-dependent nitric oxide is crucial for multi-walled carbon nanotube-induced plant tolerance against salinity. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 10511–10523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hayat, S.; Yadav, S.; Wani, A.S.; Irfan, M.; Alyemini, M.N.; Ahmad, A. Impact of sodium nitroprusside on nitrate reductase, proline content, and antioxidant system in tomato under salinity stress. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2012, 53, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hao, G.; Du, X.; Zhao, F.; Shi, R.; Wang, J. Role of nitric oxide in UV-B-induced activation of PAL and stimulation of flavonoid biosynthesis in Ginkgo biloba callus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009, 97, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Silveira, N.M.; Frungillo, L.; Marcos, F.C.; Pelegrino, M.T.; Miranda, M.T.; Seabra, A.B.; Ribeiro, R.V. Exogenous nitric oxide improves sugarcane growth and photosynthesis under water deficit. Planta 2016, 244, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Manoli, A.; Begheldo, M.; Genre, A.; Lanfranco, L.; Trevisan, S.; Quaggiotti, S. NO homeostasis is a key regulator of early nitrate perception and root elongation in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Wang, Z.; Ma, R.; Zhao, M.; Wang, F.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. NO and ABA interaction regulates tuber dormancy and sprouting in potato. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Sun, H.; Feng, F.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Q. Nitric oxide affects rice root growth by regulating auxin transport under nitrate supply. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Sun, H.; Li, J.; Song, W.; Tao, J.; Huang, S.; Chen, S.; Hou, M.; Xu, G.; Zhang, Y. Nitric oxide generated by nitrate reductase increases nitrogen uptake capacity by inducing lateral root formation and inorganic nitrogen uptake under partial nitrate nutrition in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2449–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Jaiswal, A.; Srivastava, J.P. Effect of nitric oxide on some morphological and physiological parameters in maize exposed to waterlogging stress. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2015, 10, 3462–3471. [Google Scholar]
  136. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G.; Xu, S.; Dai, J.; Li, W.; Li, Z.; Zhang, D.; Li, C.; Dong, H. Nitric oxide increases the biomass and lint yield of field-grown cotton under temporary waterlogging through physiological and molecular regulation. Field Crops Res. 2021, 261, 107989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Safavi-Rizi, V.; Herde, M.; Stöhr, C. Identification of nitric oxide (NO)-responsive genes under hypoxia in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) root. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Kopyra, M.; Gwóźdź, E. Nitric oxide stimulates seed germination and counteracts the inhibitory effect of heavy metals and salinity on root growth of Lupinus luteus. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2003, 41, 1011–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Bethke, P.C.; Libourel, I.G.; Jones, R.L. Nitric oxide reduces seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Gniazdowska, A.; Babańczyk, T.; Krasuska, U. Nitric oxide as germination controlling factor in seeds of various plant species. Phyton 2012, 52, 219–226. [Google Scholar]
  141. Hayat, S.; Yadav, S.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, A. Effect of sodium nitroprusside on the germination and antioxidant activities of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 20, 140–144. [Google Scholar]
  142. Ismail, A.M.; Ella, E.S.; Vergara, G.V.; Mackill, D.J. Mechanisms associated with tolerance to flooding during germination and early seedling growth in rice (Oryza sativa). Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Wu, M.; Wang, F.; Zhang, C.; Xie, Y.; Han, B.; Huang, J.; Shen, W. Heme oxygenase-1 is involved in nitric oxide-and cGMP-induced α-Amy2/54 gene expression in GA-treated wheat aleurone layers. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 81, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Albertos, P.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Tatematsu, K.; Mateos, I.; Sánchez-Vicente, I.; Nambara, E.; Lorenzo, O. S-nitrosylation triggers ABI5 degradation to promote seed germination and seedling growth. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Clark, D.; Durner, J.; Navarre, D.A.; Klessig, D.F. Nitric oxide inhibition of tobacco catalase and ascorbate peroxidase. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2000, 13, 1380–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Peng, R.; Bian, Z.; Zhou, L.; Cheng, W.; Hai, N.; Yang, C.; Yang, T.; Wang, X.; Wang, C. Hydrogen sulfide enhances nitric oxide-induced tolerance of hypoxia in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 2325–2340. [Google Scholar]
  147. Liu, F.; Guo, F.-Q. Nitric oxide deficiency accelerates chlorophyll breakdown and stability loss of thylakoid membranes during dark-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Wang, B.; Liu, H.; Li, C.; Zhu, Y.; Tian, X.; Ma, G.; Zou, H. Effects of nitric oxide on some physiological characteristics of maize seedlings under waterlogging. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 4501–4504. [Google Scholar]
  149. Pan, Q.-N.; Geng, C.-C.; Li, D.-D.; Xu, S.-W.; Mao, D.-D.; Umbreen, S.; Loake, G.J.; Cui, B.-M. Nitrate reductase-mediated nitric oxide regulates the leaf shape in Arabidopsis by mediating the homeostasis of reactive oxygen species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Gupta, K.J.; Kumari, A.; Florez-Sarasa, I.; Fernie, A.R.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Interaction of nitric oxide with the components of the plant mitochondrial electron transport chain. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3413–3424. [Google Scholar]
  151. Jayawardhane, J.; Cochrane, D.W.; Vyas, P.; Bykova, N.V.; Vanlerberghe, G.C.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Roles for plant mitochondrial alternative oxidase under normoxia, hypoxia, and reoxygenation conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Rutten, P.J.; Poole, P.S. Oxygen regulatory mechanisms of nitrogen fixation in rhizobia. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2019, 75, 325–389. [Google Scholar]
  153. He, L.; Li, B.; Lu, X.; Yuan, L.; Yang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Du, J.; Guo, S. The effect of exogenous calcium on mitochondria, respiratory metabolism enzymes and ion transport in cucumber roots under hypoxia. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. He, L.; Yu, L.; Li, B.; Du, N.; Guo, S. The effect of exogenous calcium on cucumber fruit quality, photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and fast chlorophyll fluorescence during the fruiting period under hypoxic stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 180. [Google Scholar]
  155. Besson-Bard, A.; Pugin, A.; Wendehenne, D. New insights into nitric oxide signaling in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Lamotte, O.; Courtois, C.; Dobrowolska, G.; Besson, A.; Pugin, A.; Wendehenne, D. Mechanisms of nitric-oxide-induced increase of free cytosolic Ca2+ concentration in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia cells. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2006, 40, 1369–1376. [Google Scholar]
  157. Loitto, V.M.; Nilsson, H.; Sundqvist, T.; Magnusson, K.E. Nitric oxide induces dose-dependent Ca2+ transients and causes temporal morphological hyperpolarization in human neutrophils. J. Cell. Physiol. 2000, 182, 402–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Rich, S.M.; Ludwig, M.; Pedersen, O.; Colmer, T.D. Aquatic adventitious roots of the wetland plant Meionectes brownii can photosynthesize: Implications for root function during flooding. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Gibberd, M.R.; Gray, J.D.; Cocks, P.S.; Colmer, T.D. Waterlogging tolerance among a diverse range of Trifolium accessions is related to root porosity, lateral root formation and ‘aerotropic rooting’. Ann. Bot. 2001, 88, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Yamauchi, T.; Tanaka, A.; Tsutsumi, N.; Inukai, Y.; Nakazono, M. A role for auxin in ethylene-dependent inducible aerenchyma formation in rice roots. Plants 2020, 9, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Murphy, M.P. Nitric oxide and cell death. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 1999, 1411, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Deng, Y.; Jia, F.; Chen, S.; Shen, Z.; Jin, Q.; Fu, G.; Ji, J. Nitric oxide as an all-rounder for enhanced photodynamic therapy: Hypoxia relief, glutathione depletion and reactive nitrogen species generation. Biomaterials 2018, 187, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Hebelstrup, K.H.; Møller, I.M. Mitochondrial signaling in plants under hypoxia: Use of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). In Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species Signaling and Communication in Plants; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 63–77. [Google Scholar]
  164. Nguyen, T.; Brunson, D.; Crespi, C.L.; Penman, B.W.; Wishnok, J.S.; Tannenbaum, S.R. DNA damage and mutation in human cells exposed to nitric oxide in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 3030–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Bai, S.; Li, M.; Yao, T.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, L.; He, Y. Nitric oxide restrain root growth by DNA damage induced cell cycle arrest in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nitric Oxide 2012, 26, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Fernández-Marcos, M.; Sanz, L.; Lewis, D.R.; Muday, G.K.; Lorenzo, O. Nitric oxide causes root apical meristem defects and growth inhibition while reducing PIN-FORMED 1 (PIN1)-dependent acropetal auxin transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 18506–18511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Zhang, Z.-W.; Luo, S.; Zhang, G.-C.; Feng, L.-Y.; Zheng, C.; Zhou, Y.-H.; He, Y.-K. Nitric oxide induces monosaccharide accumulation through enzyme S-nitrosylation. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 1834–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Novikova, G.V.; Mur, L.A.; Nosov, A.V.; Fomenkov, A.A.; Mironov, K.S.; Mamaeva, A.S.; Hall, M.A. Nitric oxide has a concentration-dependent effect on the cell cycle acting via EIN2 in Arabidopsis thaliana cultured cells. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Vandelle, E.; Delledonne, M. Peroxynitrite formation and function in plants. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 534–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Castella, C.; Mirtziou, I.; Seassau, A.; Boscari, A.; Montrichard, F.; Papadopoulou, K.; Brouquisse, R. Post-translational modifications of Medicago truncatula glutathione peroxidase 1 induced by nitric oxide. Nitric Oxide 2017, 68, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Correa-Aragunde, N.; Graziano, M.; Lamattina, L. Nitric oxide plays a central role in determining lateral root development in tomato. Planta 2004, 218, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Morot-Gaudry-Talarmain, Y.; Rockel, P.; Moureaux, T.; Quillere, I.; Leydecker, M.; Kaiser, W.; Morot-Gaudry, J. Nitrite accumulation and nitric oxide emission in relation to cellular signaling in nitrite reductase antisense tobacco. Planta 2002, 215, 708–715. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  173. Lazalt, A.M.; Beligni, M.V.; Lamattina, L. Nitric oxide preserves the level of chlorophyll in potato leaves infected by Phytophthora infestans. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1997, 103, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. He, Y.; Tang, R.-H.; Hao, Y.; Stevens, R.-D.; Cook, C.-W.; Ahn, S.-M.; Pei, Z.-M. Nitric oxide represses the Arabidopsis floral transition. Science 2004, 305, 1968–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Phoa, N.; Epe, B. Influence of nitric oxide on the generation and repair of oxidative DNA damage in mammalian cells. Carcinogenesis 2002, 23, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Emmanuel, R.; Alexandre, D.; Benoit, V.; Mohamed, H.S.; Remi, N. Nitric oxide scavenging modulates mitochondrial dysfunction induced by hypoxia/reoxygenation. Pharmacol. Rep. 2011, 63, 1189–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Timilsina, A.; Bizimana, F.; Pandey, B.; Yadav, R.K.P.; Dong, W.; Hu, C. Nitrous oxide emissions from paddies: Understanding the role of rice plants. Plants 2020, 9, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Einarsdottir, O.; Caughey, W.S. Interactions of the anesthetic nitrous oxide with bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase. Effects on protein structure, oxidase activity, and other properties. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 9199–9205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Sowa, S.; Towill, L.E. Effects of nitrous oxide on mitochondrial and cell respiration and growth in Distichlis spicata suspension cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1991, 27, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Zhao, X.-J.; Sampath, V.; Caughey, W.S. Cytochrome c oxidase catalysis of the reduction of nitric oxide to nitrous oxide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 212, 1054–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Goshima, N.; Mukai, T.; Suemori, M.; Takahashi, M.; Caboche, M.; Morikawa, H. Emission of nitrous oxide (N2O) from transgenic tobacco expressing antisense NiR mRNA. Plant J. 1999, 19, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Bellido-Pedraza, C.M.; Calatrava, V.; Llamas, A.; Fernandez, E.; Sanz-Luque, E.; Galvan, A. Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Nitrite Are Highly Dependent on Nitrate Reductase in the Microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Li, G.; Zhu, S.; Wu, W.; Zhang, C.; Peng, Y.; Wang, Q.; Shi, J. Exogenous nitric oxide induces disease resistance against Monilinia fructicola through activating the phenylpropanoid pathway in peach fruit. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 3030–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Xu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Wei, J.; Wu, B. Effect of nitrous oxide against Botrytis cinerea and phenylpropanoid pathway metabolism in table grapes. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 254, 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  185. Palomer, X.; Roig-Villanova, I.; Grima-Calvo, D.; Vendrell, M. Effects of nitrous oxide (N2O) treatment on the postharvest ripening of banana fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2005, 36, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  186. Zhu, S.-H.; Zhou, J. Effect of nitric oxide on ethylene production in strawberry fruit during storage. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 1517–1522. [Google Scholar]
  187. Timilsina, A.; Oenema, O.; Luo, J.; Wang, Y.; Dong, W.; Pandey, B.; Hu, C. Plants are a natural source of nitrous oxide even in field conditions as explained by 15N site preference. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 805, 150262. [Google Scholar]
  188. Yan, X.-Y.; Shi, S.-L.; Du, L.-J.; Xing, G. Pathways of N2O emission from rice paddy soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2000, 32, 437–440. [Google Scholar]
  189. Bruhn, D.; Albert, K.R.; Mikkelsen, T.N.; Ambus, P. UV-induced N2O emission from plants. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 99, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Smart, D.R.; Bloom, A.J. Wheat leaves emit nitrous oxide during nitrate assimilation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 7875–7878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Machacova, K.; Vainio, E.; Urban, O.; Pihlatie, M. Seasonal dynamics of stem N2O exchange follow the physiological activity of boreal trees. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4989. [Google Scholar]
  192. Gouble, B.; Fath, D.; Soudain, P. Nitrous oxide inhibition of ethylene production in ripening and senescing climacteric fruits. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1995, 5, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Lichanporn, I.; Techavuthiporn, C. The effects of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide on enzymatic browning in longkong (Aglaia dookkoo Griff.). Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 86, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Cunha, L.C., Jr.; Jacomino, Â.P.; Trevisan, M.J.; de Almeida Teixeira, G.H. Storage of ‘Oso Grande’ Strawberries in Controlled Atmosphere Containing Nitrous Oxide (N2O). HortScience 2013, 48, 1283–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Pang, Y.; Wang, J. Various electron donors for biological nitrate removal: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 794, 148699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Miller, M.N.; Zebarth, B.J.; Dandie, C.E.; Burton, D.L.; Goyer, C.; Trevors, J.T. Influence of liquid manure on soil denitrifier abundance, denitrification, and nitrous oxide emissions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009, 73, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Gupta, K.J.; Kaiser, W.M. Production and scavenging of nitric oxide by barley root mitochondria. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Butterbach-Bahl, K.; Baggs, E.M.; Dannenmann, M.; Kiese, R.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: How well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 368, 20130122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Timilsina, A.; Dong, W.; Luo, J.; Lindsey, S.; Wang, Y.; Hu, C. Nitrogen isotopic signatures and fluxes of N2O in response to land-use change on naturally occurring saline-alkaline soil. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Bizimana, F.; Timilsina, A.; Dong, W.; Uwamungu, J.Y.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Pandey, B.; Qin, S.; Hu, C. Effects of long-term nitrogen fertilization on N2O, N2 and their yield-scaled emissions in a temperate semi-arid agro-ecosystem. J. Soils Sediments 2021, 21, 1659–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Bizimana, F.; Luo, J.; Timilsina, A.; Dong, W.; Gaudel, G.; Ding, K.; Qin, S.; Hu, C. Estimating field N2 emissions based on laboratory-quantified N2O/(N2O + N2) ratio and field quantified N2O emissions. J. Soils Sediments 2022, 22, 2196–2208. [Google Scholar]
  202. Machacova, K.; Papen, H.; Kreuzwieser, J.; Rennenberg, H. Inundation strongly stimulates nitrous oxide emissions from stems of the upland tree Fagus sylvatica and the riparian tree Alnus glutinosa. Plant Soil 2013, 364, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Liu, B.; Rennenberg, H.; Kreuzwieser, J. Hypoxia induces stem and leaf nitric oxide (NO) emission from poplar seedlings. Planta 2015, 241, 579–589. [Google Scholar]
  204. Zafari, S.; Hebelstrup, K.H.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Transcriptional and metabolic changes associated with phytoglobin expression during germination of barley seeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Perazzolli, M.; Dominici, P.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Zago, E.; Zeier, J.; Sonoda, M.; Delledonne, M. Arabidopsis nonsymbiotic hemoglobin AHb1 modulates nitric oxide bioactivity. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2785–2794. [Google Scholar]
  206. Gupta, K.J.; Stoimenova, M.; Kaiser, W.M. In higher plants, only root mitochondria, but not leaf mitochondria reduce nitrite to NO, in vitro and in situ. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2601–2609. [Google Scholar]
  207. Rubio, M.C.; Calvo-Begueria, L.; Díaz-Mendoza, M.; Elhiti, M.; Moore, M.; Matamoros, M.A.; Becana, M. Phytoglobins in the nuclei, cytoplasm and chloroplasts modulate nitric oxide signaling and interact with abscisic acid. Plant J. 2019, 100, 38–54. [Google Scholar]
  208. Lenhart, K.; Behrendt, T.; Greiner, S.; Steinkamp, J.; Well, R.; Giesemann, A.; Keppler, F. Nitrous oxide effluxes from plants as a potentially important source to the atmosphere. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 1398–1408. [Google Scholar]
  209. Plouviez, M.; Wheeler, D.; Shilton, A.; Packer, M.A.; McLenachan, P.A.; Sanz-Luque, E.; Guieysse, B. The biosynthesis of nitrous oxide in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J. 2017, 91, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  210. Chaki, M.; Begara-Morales, J.C.; Valderrama, R.; Mata-Pérez, C.; Padilla-Serrano, M.N.; Barroso, J.B. Role of nitric oxide—Dependent posttranslational modifications of proteins under abiotic stress. In Plant Life under Changing Environment; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 793–809. [Google Scholar]
  211. Oliveira, H.C.; Salgado, I. Role of plant mitochondria in nitric oxide homeostasis during oxygen deficiency. In Nitric Oxide in Plants: Metabolism and Role in Stress Physiology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 57–74. [Google Scholar]
  212. Sturms, R.; DiSpirito, A.A.; Hargrove, M.S. Plant and cyanobacterial hemoglobins reduce nitrite to nitric oxide under anoxic conditions. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 3873–3878. [Google Scholar]
  213. Astier, J.; Rasul, S.; Koen, E.; Manzoor, H.; Besson-Bard, A.; Lamotte, O.; Wendehenne, D. S-nitrosylation: An emerging post-translational protein modification in plants. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Feng, J.; Chen, L.; Zuo, J. Protein S-nitrosylation in plants: Current progresses and challenges. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2019, 61, 1206–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Kolbert, Z.; Feigl, G.; Bordé, Á.; Molnár, Á.; Erdei, L. Protein tyrosine nitration in plants: Present knowledge, computational prediction and future perspectives. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 113, 56–63. [Google Scholar]
  216. Corpas, F.J.; Palma, J.M.; Del Río, L.A.; Barroso, J.B. Protein tyrosine nitration in higher plants grown under natural and stress conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Blanquet, P.; Silva, L.; Catrice, O.; Bruand, C.; Carvalho, H.; Meilhoc, E. Sinorhizobium meliloti controls nitric oxide—Mediated post-translational modification of a Medicago truncatula nodule protein. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2015, 28, 1353–1363. [Google Scholar]
  218. Foster, M.W.; McMahon, T.J.; Stamler, J.S. S-nitrosylation in health and disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2003, 9, 160–168. [Google Scholar]
  219. Chen, S.C.; Huang, B.; Liu, Y.C.; Shyu, K.G.; Lin, P.Y.; Wang, D.L. Acute hypoxia enhances proteins’ S-nitrosylation in endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 377, 1274–1278. [Google Scholar]
  220. Gupta, A.K.; Kumari, A.; Mishra, S.; Wany, A.; Gupta, K.J. The functional role of nitric oxide in plant mitochondrial metabolism. Adv. Bot. Res. 2016, 77, 145–163. [Google Scholar]
  221. Fancy, N.N.; Bahlmann, A.K.; Loake, G.J. Nitric oxide function in plant abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 462–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Sun, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, X.; Li, B.; Jin, C.; Lin, X. Molecular functions of nitric oxide and its potential applications in horticultural crops. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 71. [Google Scholar]
  223. Zhan, N.; Wang, C.; Chen, L.; Yang, H.; Feng, J.; Gong, X.; Zuo, J. S-nitrosylation targets GSNO reductase for selective autophagy during hypoxia responses in plants. Mol. Cell 2018, 71, 142–154. [Google Scholar]
  224. Sainz, M.; Pérez-Rontomé, C.; Ramos, J.; Mulet, J.M.; James, E.K.; Bhattacharjee, U.; Becana, M. Plant hemoglobins may be maintained in functional form by reduced flavins in the nuclei, and confer differential tolerance to nitro-oxidative stress. Plant J. 2013, 76, 875–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Freschi, L. Nitric oxide and phytohormone interactions: Current status and perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Astier, J.; Lindermayr, C. Nitric oxide-dependent posttranslational modification in plants: An update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 15193–15208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  227. Besson-Bard, A.; Courtois, C.; Gauthier, A.; Dahan, J.; Dobrowolska, G.; Jeandroz, S.; Alain, P.; David, W. Nitric oxide in plants: Production and cross-talk with Ca2+ signaling. Mol. Plant 2008, 1, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Possible causes of hypoxia and anoxia, their consequences, and defense mechanisms in response to O2 deficiency. Red arrows represent negative effects to plants, while green ones represent positive effects.
Figure 1. Possible causes of hypoxia and anoxia, their consequences, and defense mechanisms in response to O2 deficiency. Red arrows represent negative effects to plants, while green ones represent positive effects.
Ijms 23 11522 g001
Figure 2. Proposed model on mechanisms of hypoxia and anoxia tolerance as well as cell death by NO3-NO2-NO pathway. The red arrows represent negative effects, while the green ones represent positive effects.
Figure 2. Proposed model on mechanisms of hypoxia and anoxia tolerance as well as cell death by NO3-NO2-NO pathway. The red arrows represent negative effects, while the green ones represent positive effects.
Ijms 23 11522 g002
Table 1. Role of NO3-NO2-NO pathway during oxygen-limited conditions and other stresses on plant defense mechanisms.
Table 1. Role of NO3-NO2-NO pathway during oxygen-limited conditions and other stresses on plant defense mechanisms.
Activities/Defense MechanismsConditionsReferences
NO3Maintains photosynthesis and transpirationWaterlogging[21]
NO3Protection of mitochondrial ultrastructure for a longer timeAnoxia[97]
NO3Maintains membrane stabilityHypoxia[102]
NO3Higher activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, APX, CAT, glutathione reductase (GR, EC 1.8.1.7), and guaiacol peroxidase (GPOD, EC 1.11.1.7)Hypoxia[79]
NO3Increases the various nutrient contentsWaterlogging[72]
NO3Increases seed germination rate by regulating the ABA levelNormoxia[66]
NR inhibitionGrowth is disturbedWaterlogging[94,95]
NO3Increases ATP synthesis while decreasing fermentationWaterlogging[75]
NO3Maintains the level of metabolites such as sucrose, alanine, γ-aminobutyrate, lactate, and succinate and decreases fermentationWaterlogging[73]
NO3Increases in CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and shoot biomassWaterlogging[78]
NO3UV-radiation tolerance by reducing H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) and increasing plants’ height and biomassUV stress[116]
NO3 and NRDelay wilting and anoxia symptomsAnoxia[99]
NR-deficient mutant plantProduces less NO that is more susceptible to bacterial and fungal attack through decreasing hypersensitive responsePathogen attack[117]
NO2Decreases fermentation that helps to reduce the toxicity of fermentative metabolitesHypoxia[10]
NO3 and NO2Improves cytoplasmic acidificationHypoxia and Anoxia[73,74]
NO2ATP synthesis through mitochondria ETCsAnoxia[118]
NO2Protects mitochondrial structure and functionsHypoxia[111]
NR-dependent NO productionDefense against pathogen through rapid development of hypersensitive response and lessening the effects of clorotic lesions and bacterial infectionPathogen attack[40,119]
NR-dependent NO productionInvolved in cold acclimation and freezing tolerance through reductions in electrolyte leakageCold stress[39]
NODecreases the mitochondrial oxidative damages through decreased ROS content and maintained the structure and function of mitochondria through increasing mitochondrial antioxidants enzymes, improving mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis, promoting genes related to C-repeat binding factors (CBFs), while reducing the peroxidation of mitochondrial fatty acidsCold stress[120,121]
NOMaintains quality, delays ripening, and enhances resistance to pathogens through increasing the activities of antioxidants, gene regulation, and suppressing ethylene productionPostharvest storage[122]
NR-dependent NO productionAluminum-induced ROS and lipid peroxidation are reduced, while it improves root growth during the stress through the regulation of ascorbate–glutathione cycleMetal stress[123,124]
NR-dependent NO productionCopper tolerance through enhanced antioxidant activitiesMetal stress[125]
NOImproved seed germination through upregulation of α-amylase, protease, enzymes of N assimilation, and antioxidantsMetal stress[126]
NR-dependent NO productionSalt tolerance by balancing redox and ions, reducing ROS, and increasing antioxidantsSalt stress[127]
NOIncreases activities of antioxidants and proline contentSalt stress[128]
NR-dependent NO productionThe rapid accumulation of UV-absorbing substances such as flavonoidsUV stress[41,129]
NR-dependent NO productionHigher photosynthetic rates and stomatal conductance, and less ROS accumulation due to higher activities of various antioxidantsDrought stress[43]
NOImproved photosynthesis activities and promotes growthDrought stress[130]
NR-dependent NO formation and induction of non-symbiotic hemoglobinRoot elongation through the activities of actin cytoskeleton and hormonal signalingNormoxia[131]
NR-dependent NO productionReleases tuber dormancy and sprouting via the expression of genes involved in ABA catabolismNormoxia[132]
NO3 dependent NO productionRegulation of lateral root and seminal root growth by regulating auxin transport, while lateral root formation increases N uptake capacity during partial N availabilityNormoxia[133,134]
NO2 dependent NO productionRegulates O2 concentration and postpone anoxiaHypoxia[53]
NO2 and NOAccelerates germination through decreasing lipid peroxidation and DNA fragmentation in germinating seedsPhysiological hypoxia[55]
NODecreases cell membrane injuries and increases stomatal conductance and transpiration rate as compared to the controlWaterlogging[135]
NO3, NO2 and NOBreaks dormancy in seeds through NO signalingNormoxia[109]
NOIncreases biomass and lint yield of cotton plants through reduced lipid peroxidation, the expression of waterlogging tolerance-related genes, and increasing photosynthesis processWaterlogging[136]
NOEnhances adventitious root formationWaterlogging[20]
NORegulates genes belonging to phytohormones, Cytochrome P450 encoding genes (CYP72A14 and CYP707A3) that regulate ROS and genes related to cell wall synthesis, modification, and degradationHypoxia[137]
Table 2. Adverse effects of a higher level of NO in plants. The high level of NO was achieved through a higher dose of NO donor or using NO-overproducing mutants or hypoxia plus NO donors.
Table 2. Adverse effects of a higher level of NO in plants. The high level of NO was achieved through a higher dose of NO donor or using NO-overproducing mutants or hypoxia plus NO donors.
Effects of Higher Level of NOReferences
Decreases the root growth through DNA damage, induces cell cycle arrest and inhibits primary root growth by affecting root apical meristem activity and cell elongation.[165,166]
Delayed flowering, retarded root development, and reduced starch granule formation through S-nitrosylation modification.[167]
Cell death through increased electrolyte leakage, cell wall degradation, cytoplasmic streaming, and DNA fragmentation.[27]
Decreases the expression of cyclins (CYC) and Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (CDKs), resulting in the downregulation of cell cycle progression.[168]
NO can generate peroxynitrite, which is a mediator of cytochrome c loss, protein oxidation and nitration, lipid peroxidation, mitochondrial dysfunction, damage DNA, and cell death.[26,169]
NO can inhibit antioxidants such as catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and ascorbate peroxidase in a reversible way and peroxynitrite in an irreversible way.[145,170]
NO can change the redox state and promote cell death.[33]
Inhibits lateral and primary root growth through reduced cell division and the expression of the auxin reporter markers DR5pro:GUS/GFP.[166,171]
Inhibits growth of tobacco plants through peroxynitrite formation and tyrosine nitration.[172]
Inhibits seed germination, while the scavenging of NO alleviates the effect.[139]
Inhibits the shoot growth and decreases the chlorophyll contents of the plants.[173,174]
Table 3. Beneficial activities of N2O in plants.
Table 3. Beneficial activities of N2O in plants.
Beneficial Activities of N2OReference
Using post-harvest technology, the storage of fruits under N2O can lower ethylene production and slow the ripening of fruits.[185,192]
N2O can increase resistance to pathogens by improving the accumulation of total phenolic, flavonoids, and lignin, as well as increase the activities of key enzymes in the metabolism of phenylpropanol.[184]
Can inhibit the browning activities of enzymes such as polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and/or peroxidase (POD) and delay browning in fruits.[193]
Can delay decay, lower the respiratory rate, and maintain the quality of fruit.[194]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Timilsina, A.; Dong, W.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Liu, B.; Hu, C. Nitrate–Nitrite–Nitric Oxide Pathway: A Mechanism of Hypoxia and Anoxia Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911522

AMA Style

Timilsina A, Dong W, Hasanuzzaman M, Liu B, Hu C. Nitrate–Nitrite–Nitric Oxide Pathway: A Mechanism of Hypoxia and Anoxia Tolerance in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(19):11522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911522

Chicago/Turabian Style

Timilsina, Arbindra, Wenxu Dong, Mirza Hasanuzzaman, Binbin Liu, and Chunsheng Hu. 2022. "Nitrate–Nitrite–Nitric Oxide Pathway: A Mechanism of Hypoxia and Anoxia Tolerance in Plants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 19: 11522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911522

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop