Next Article in Journal
Identifying Hub Genes Associated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Resistance in Breast Cancer and Potential Drug Repurposing for the Development of Precision Medicine
Next Article in Special Issue
Mlig-SKP1 Gene Is Required for Spermatogenesis in the Flatworm Macrostomum lignano
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Evaluation of Quantum Dots and Antibodies Conjugation by Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Presentation of Two Unrelated Clinical Cases from the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania with the Same Previously Undescribed Variant in the COL6A2 Gene
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms232012638
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Matrix Metalloproteinase Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Breast Cancer in the Caucasian Women of Russia

by
Nadezhda Pavlova
,
Sergey Demin
,
Mikhail Churnosov
*,
Evgeny Reshetnikov
,
Inna Aristova
,
Maria Churnosova
and
Irina Ponomarenko
Department of Medical Biological Disciplines, Belgorod State National Research University, 308015 Belgorod, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(20), 12638; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012638
Submission received: 18 September 2022 / Revised: 14 October 2022 / Accepted: 15 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Molecular Genetics and Genomics in Russia)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We conducted this study to explore the association between matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) gene polymorphisms and breast cancer (BC) risk in the Caucasian women of Russia. In total, 358 affected (BC) and 746 unaffected (cancer-free) women were included in this case-control retrospective study. From BC-related genes in previous studies, ten single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in five MMP genes (MMP1, 2, 3, 8, 9) were genotyped. The BC risk was calculated by logistic regression (to evaluate the SNPs’ independent effects) and model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction (MB-MDR) (to identify SNP–SNP interactions) methods. The allelic variants’ distribution of c.836 A > G (rs17576) and c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) MMP9 was significantly different between BC and cancer-free women: for G minor alleles, these SNPs manifested disorder protective effects (OR 0.82 and OR 0.67–0.71, respectively, pperm ≤ 0.035). Eleven haplotypes of six SNPs MMP9 were involved in BC risk (nine haplotypes) and protective (two haplotypes) effects. All 10 SNPs of the MMP genes examined were associated with BC within the 13 SNP–SNP interaction simulated models, with a pivotal role of the two-locus (rs17577 × rs3918242) MMP9 epistatic interaction (defined as 1.81% BC entropy within more than 60% of the genetic models). Under in silico bioinformatics, BC susceptibility MMP polymorphic loci are located in functionally active genome regions and impact genes expression and splicing “regulators” in the mammary gland. The biological pathways of BC MMP candidate genes are mainly realized due to metalloendopeptidase activity and extracellular matrix organization (structure, disassembly, metabolic process, etc.). In conclusion, our data show that MMP gene polymorphisms are related to BC susceptibility in the Caucasian women of Russia.

1. Introduction

BC is a malignant breast tumor with epithelial origin [1]. According to world statistics (material of the International Agency for Research on Cancer), currently, more than 2 million new cases of BC are detected annually among the world population [2] (http://canscreen5.iarc.fr, accessed on 17 September 2022). Among all cases of cancer (19.3 million new tumor cases are registered annually in the world), BC is the most frequent (11.7%) [2]. Among the female population, the proportion of BC among all oncological diseases is 24.5%, and regarding global female mortality, the proportion of BC is 15.5% [3]. The problem of BC is no less significant for Russia. According to official statistics, the incidence rate is 82.8 per 100,000 women [4]. BC ranks first both in terms of cancer incidence in Russian women (20.9%) and the cause of female death from malignant tumors (16.2%) [5].
Genetic factors have an essential effect on the susceptibility to BC [6,7,8,9,10]. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of BC indicate that more than 180 different single nucleotide polymorphic variants have a connection with the disorder [8]. It should be noted that these polymorphic loci explain only 18% of the disease heritability [9], whereas under modern genetic estimates, the contribution of the hereditary component to BC formation reaches up to 31% [10]. Based on this, it is noted that despite the active study of the genetic foundations of BC, which has been intensively conducted by numerous scientific teams over the past decades, a significant part of the genetic determinants (more than 40%) involved in the occurrence of the disease remain unknown to date, which dictates the need to continue genetic association studies of BC.
Among the “potential” candidate genes for BC, the MMP genes are being actively studied [11,12]. The relationship of the expression products of these genes (proteins of the same name) with BC is currently beyond doubt [13,14]. Due to its collagenase activity, the ability to cleave pro-apoptotic factors, mobilize/activate pro-angiogenic factors (growth factors, etc.), and suppress the production of angiogenesis inhibitors (angiostatin, endostatin, etc.), MMP provides degradation of the stromal connective tissue components and the basement membrane, and has “key” importance in the processes of tumor angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis [13,14]. Increased expression of MMP (MMP1, MMP2, MMP9, etc.) in the lesion induces the growth of tumor tissue and initiates its invasion and metastasis [12,15]. There is convincing data on the association of MMP with the survival of BC patients [13].
The relationship of functionally noticeable polymorphisms of MMP with BC risk is being actively studied by various scientific teams [12,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] etc. Nevertheless, despite the considerable accumulated factual material on this topic, it should be stated that these data often do not agree with each other. In some cases, they are contradictory, and individual loci (for example, c.2003 G>A (rs17577) MMP9, p.133 C>T (rs679620) MMP3 [27,28]) are single and fragmentary. For example, a significant association of c.-1607 2G>1G (rs1799750) MMP1 with BC was found in five studies, whereas no such association was found in ten studies [12,16,17,18,19]. Contradictory data on the association with BC are available in the previously public literature for the locus c.-1562 C>T (rs3918242) MMP9. In some studies, the polymorphic variant T was associated with increased risk of developing the disease [20,21,22]. According to the results of other studies, this locus was not associated with the disorder [16,17,18,23,24,25] or vice versa, the genotype TT was a BC protective factor [26]. The above data dictate the need to continue research on this topic in order to establish the polymorphic loci of MMP genes causal for BC in various populations, including the Russian Federation.
Therefore, we conducted this study to further explore the association between matrix MMP gene polymorphisms and BC susceptibility in the Caucasian women of Russia.

2. Results

A comprehensive description of the phenotypic characteristics of the examined BC and cancer-free women is summarized in Table 1. The age range of the study participants was 28–84 years, with a predominance of postmenopausal women (2/3). There was no difference (p > 0.05) between the BC and cancer-free women regarding age, proportion of premenopausal/postmenopausal subjects, age at menarche, age at menopause, and smoker habits. At the same time, affected women had a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.003) and a higher incidence of obesity when compared with the unaffected ones (p = 0.01). The majority of the BC patients were at clinical cancer stage T0–T2 (74%) and were predominantly estrogen receptor (ER) positive (66%), progesterone receptor (PR) positive (59%), and ductal carcinoma (94%) with a well differentiated/moderately differentiated (G1/G2) tumor histological grade (68%) (Table 1).
All ten investigated SNPs were in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in both studied groups, BC and cancer-free woman, taking into account the Bonferroni correction for the number of examined loci (n = 10, pbonf > 0.005 (0.05/10). According to the data of Supplementary Table S1, among the BC subjects, the observed values pHWE were ≥0.015 and among the cancer-free group, the values were ≥0.086. Table 2 shows the association analysis results. Interestingly, the allele frequencies of the c.836 A>G (rs17576) and c. 1721 C>G (rs2250889) MMP9 gene were significantly different between the BC and cancer-free subjects. Women carrying the G alleles of these loci, providing disorder protection, had an 18% (OR 0.82 95%CI 0.68–0.99 p  =  0.035 pperm = 0.035) and 29% (OR 0.71 95%CI 0.52–0.97 p  =  0.033 pperm = 0.034) lower BC risk than women with A (rs17576) and C (rs2250889) alleles, respectively. It should be noted that in the additive and dominant models, after adjustment for confounding factors, locus c. 1721 C>G (rs2250889) MMP9 was associated with BC and reduced risk of developing BC (OR 0.69 95%CI 0.51–0.95 p  =  0.024 pperm = 0.025 and OR 0.67 95%CI 0.47–0.95 p  =  0.026 pperm = 0.026, respectively) (Table 2).
Next, we examined the associations between the MMP9 gene haplotypes and BC. The detailed findings of the association analysis for various haplotypic constructions are presented in Table 3. We found eleven different haplotypes of the MMP9 gene with six loci linked with BC, among which the vast majority of haplotypes determined an increased disorder risk (nine haplotypes) while only two haplotypes were associated with a low disease risk. Of note, five various haplotypic constructions (four-, five-, and six-locus) included different combinations of the allelic variants: rs3918242 (C), rs3918249 (T), rs17576 (A), rs3787268 (A), rs2250889 (C), and rs17577 (G) showed the most pronounced BC risk effect and increased the likelihood of development of the disease by more than three times (Table 3). Importantly, the direction of the effects of the c.836 A > G (rs17576) and c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) loci in the composition of haplotypes fully corresponded to the nature of their independent association with the disease (minor G alleles of these loci were protective; major A (rs17576) and C (rs2250889) alleles were risky).
After demonstrating that individual SNPs and haplotypes in the MMP9 gene may participate in BC susceptibility, we investigated the outcomes of interlocus interactions between all ten studied polymorphisms and five MMP genes. Using MB-MDR software (https://github.com/imbs-hl/mbmdR, accessed on 18 June 2022), the correlation between SNP interactions and BC was computed. According to the obtained simulation results, all 10 examined SNPs within 13 epistatic interaction models (5 (2-locus), 6 (3-locus), 2 (4-locus), and 1 (5-locus)) were associated with BC risk (Table 4). At the same time, it is important to note that, firstly, two polymorphisms: c.2003 G > A (rs17577) and c.-1562 C > T (rs3918242) MMP9, were included in the vast majority (>60%) of the significant models (9 and 8 models, respectively). Secondly, the two-locus combination: c.2003 G > A (rs17577) × c.-1562 C > T (rs3918242), formed the basis of 8 of the 13 considered genetic models, which indicates its key importance in the genetic determination of BC. The maximum value of the Wald indicator (WH = 48.71) was a five-locus model: c. 1721 G > C (rs2250889) MMP9 × c.-1607 2G > 1G (rs1799750) MMP1 × c.139-369 T > C (rs3918249) MMP9 × c.259 T > C (rs1940475) MMP8 × c.-1306 C > T (rs243865) MMP2.
The carriage of several specific genotype combinations of the MMP9 gene had the most pronounced BC risk effect (beta = 1.54–1.61 and p = 0.0001–0.0004): GA(rs17577) × CC(rs2250889) × CC(rs3918242), GG(rs17577) × CC(rs2250889) × CT(rs3918242), GA(rs17577) × CC(rs3918242), GG(rs17577) × CT(rs3918242) (Supplementary Table S2). On the contrary, the combination of genotypes 1G1G (rs1799750) MMP1 × TT (rs679620) MMP3 showed a considerable protective effect on the BC relation (beta = −0.79 and p = 0.0004) (Supplementary Table S2).
To visualize the established BC-involved interlocus interactions of MMP genes, a network (entropy graph) was constructed by multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) analysis (http://www.multifactordimensionalityreduction.org/, accessed on 18 June 2022). According the data shown in Figure 1, the largest contribution to BC susceptibility is by the synergistic two-locus interaction: c.2003 G > A (rs17577) × c.-1562 C > T (rs3918242) (which defines 1.81% of the BC entropy; in Figure 1, it is represented in red color), whose contribution to the BC predisposition was 4–5 times higher than any of the main effects of the individual loci (each of the studied loci determined no more than 0.27–0.42% of the entropy) (Figure 1).

2.1. Predicted Functional Outputs for BC-Associated SNPs

2.1.1. Non-Synonymous (nsSNP) and Regulatory (regSNP) Impact

In total, 6 SNPs among 134 analyzed polymorphisms (10 BC-involved loci and 124 SNPs strongly liked with them) were nsSNPs such as c.836 A > G (rs17576) MMP9 (p.Q279R), c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) MMP9 (p.574P), c.2003 G > A (rs17577) MMP9 (p.R668Q), c.133 C > T (rs679620) MMP3 (p.K45E), c.259 T > C (rs1940475) MMP8 (p.K87E), and c.95 G > A (rs3765620) MMP8 (p.L19V) (linked with rs1940475, r2 = 0.85 and D’ = 1.00) (Supplementary Table S3). All these nsSNPs are marked in the SIFT (https://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg/, accessed on 18 June 2022) and PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/index.shtml, accessed on 18 June 2022) public databases as tolerated and benign, respectively (Supplementary Table S3).
In accordance with the HaploReg public epigenetic data (https://pubs.broadinstitute.org/mammals/haploreg/haploreg.php, accessed on 18 June 2022), we predicted a meaningful function of 10 BC-related polymorphic loci of MMP genes and the vast majority of strongly linked polymorphisms (121 loci out of 124 SNPs, 97.58%) in relation to 10 genes located next to them such as MMP9, SLC12A5, MMP8, RP11-465L10.7, MMP3, RP11-465L10.10, MMP2, LOC100288077, MMP1, and ZNF335 (Supplementary Table S4). Interestingly, nine out of the 10 BC-associated loci (with the exception of rs17577) w located in the region of 42 regulatory motifs and determine their sensitivity to 39 TFs (transcription factors) (Supplementary Table S5). SNP c.-1607 2G > 1G (rs1799750) MMP1 is situated in the region of the largest number of DNA motifs (n = 21). In general, 105 loci out of 124 strongly coupled polymorphisms (84.68%) define the DNA motifs’ sensitivity to plenty of TFs (Supplementary Table S4). A considerable quantity of loci among the studied 134 SNPs are located in functionally active regions of the genome such as hypersensibility to DNase (76 SNPs, 56.71%), enhancers (72 SNPs, 53.74%), promoters (49 SNPs, 36.56%), binding/interaction with regulatory proteins (21 SNPs, 15.67%), etc. (Supplementary Table S4).
At the same time, it is important to emphasize that almost all polymorphic loci associated with BC (with the exception of rs3918242) exhibit significant epigenetic effects in cultures of target organ cells in BC: mammary gland (primary epithelial and myoepithelial breast cells). So, in particular, c.836 A > G (rs17576) and c.2003 G > A (rs17577) MMP9 are located in the promoter and hypersensibility to DNase regions, respectively, of HMEC mammary epithelial primary cells (Epigenome ID: E119, Mnemonic: BRST.HMEC); SNPs c.-1607 2G > 1G (rs1799750) MMP1, c.259 T > C (rs1940475) MMP8, c.836 A > G (rs17576) MMP9, c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) MMP9 are situated in enhancer sites of this mammary cell culture. The polymorphic loci c.836 A > G (rs17576), c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889), c. 1331-163 G > A (rs3787268), and c.2003 G > A (rs17577) of the MMP9 gene are positioned in the enhancer points of the breast variant human mammary epithelial cells (vHMEC) (Epigenome ID: E028, Mnemonic: BRST.HMEC.35). SNPs c.-1306 C > T (rs243865) MMP2, c.133 C > T (rs679620) MMP3, c.139-369 T > C (rs3918249) MMP9, c. 1331-163 G > A (rs3787268) MMP9, c.2003 G > A (rs17577) MMP9, c.836 A > G (rs17576) MMP9, c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) MMP9, and c.836 A > G (rs17576) MMP9 are disposed in the enhancer and promoter regions, respectively, of breast myoepithelial primary cells (Epigenome ID: E027, Mnemonic: BRST.MYO). A significant number of strongly linked loci also exhibit functional effects in primary epithelial and myoepithelial breast cells (Supplementary Table S4).

2.1.2. Expression (eSNP) and Splicing (sSNP) Impact

In accordance with the Blood eQTL Browser (http://genenetwork.nl/bloodeqtlbrowser/, accessed on 18 June 2022), two eSNPs, c. 1331-163 G > A (rs3787268) MMP9 and c.-1306 C > T (rs243865) MMP2, are blood expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL), which are related and displayed an association (pFDR = 0) with the transcription level of three genes, such as AL162458.10-3, MMP9 (Z score = −11.51), and AYTL1 (Z score = −14.37). In addition, 18 loci are highly linked with 4 BC-associated polymorphisms, including the expression regulators of four genes (DNTTIP1, AL162458.10-3, MMP9, AYTL1) in peripheral blood (Supplementary Table S6).
Furthermore, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression and splicing information obtained from the GTEx portal database (https://gtexportal.org/home/, accessed on 18 June 2022) demonstrated, firstly, that 10 BC risk loci and 115 SNPs among 124 loci strongly linked to them (92.74%) are identified by eQTL for 23 genes, such as RP11-212I21.2, RP11-465L10.10, RP11-817J15.3, RP3-337O18.9, RPL13P2, CD40, DNTTIP1, MMP1, MMP10, PCIF1, NEURL2, MP27, MMP9, PLTP, SLC12A5, SNX21, SPATA25, SYS1, WFDC10B, WFDC3, WTAPP1, ZNF335, and ZSWIM1 (Supplementary Tables S7 and S8). Secondly, 8 BC-involved polymorphisms and 97 coupled loci are sSNPs for 6 genes, such as SNX21, WTAPP1, ACOT8, CD40, PLTP, and SLC12A5 (Supplementary Tables S9 and S10).
It is extremely interesting that 3 BC-associated SNPs, c.-1607 2G > 1G (rs1799750) MMP1, c.2003 G > A (rs17577) MMP9, and c.-1562 C > T (rs3918242) MMP9, and 12 loci linked to the last 2 SNPs are eSNPs (MMP1, SNX21, SLC12A5) in BC target organ: the mammary gland (Supplementary Tables S7 and S8). Additionally, interestingly, polymorphism c. 1331-163 G > A (rs3787268) MMP9 and 12 coupled SNPs are sSNPs (PLTP) in breast tissue (Supplementary Tables S9 and S10).

2.2. Identification of Biological Pathways for BC Putative Target Genes

As a summary of our research, we deciphered the biological mechanisms (molecular functions; biological processes; cellular components; reactomic pathways; protein classes) of the BC putative target genes obtained based on the considered causal SNP (with linked loci) functional variants (nsSNP, regSNPs, eSNP, sSNP). So, in particular, c.836 A > G (rs17576) and c.2003 G > A (rs17577) MMP9 are located in the promoter and hypersensibility to DNase regions, respectively, of HMEC mammary epithelial primary cells (Epigenome ID: E119, Mnemonic: BRST.HMEC); SNPs c.-1607 2G > 1G (rs1799750) MMP1, c.259 T > C (rs1940475) MMP8, c.836 A > G (rs17576) MMP9, and c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) MMP9 are situated in the enhancer sites of this mammary cell culture. At the beginning, we examined the biological pathways of 32 genes functionally related to BC causal loci and SNPs linked to them in various organs and tissues of the organism (Supplementary Tables S3, S4 and S7–S10). Then, we evaluated the significant enrichment of the pathways for breast-specific genes only (n = 12; LOC100288077, RP11-465L10.10, RP11-465L10, MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, MMP8, MMP9, ZNF335, SLC12A5, PLTP, SNX21), i.e., genes that are functionally appreciable (missense mutations; eQTL; sQTL; regulatory) in the mammary gland (Supplementary Tables S3, S4 and S7–S10).
Using the Gene Ontology biological resource (http://geneontology.org/, accessed on 18 June 2022), about 50 different biological pathways were identified (Supplementary Table S11), which are largely related to metalloendopeptidase activity and extracellular matrix organization (structure, disassembly, metabolic process, etc.). Several biological mechanisms demonstrated a Fold Enrichment indicator of more than 100 such as activation of matrix metalloproteinases, extracellular matrix disassembly, collagen metabolic/catabolic process, cellular response to UV-A, and plasminogen-activating cascade (Supplementary Table S11). The interaction network of BC candidate genes (Figure 2, obtained by the GeneMANIA (https://genemania.org/, accessed on 18 June 2022)) indicates a key role in the following interactions: cooperative expression of genes (40.67%), overall domains of proteins (30.90%), and physical (positional) communications (15.96%), for which the leading role was paired gene–gene mutual influence of KLHL23–ACOT8, MMP3–MMP10, ZSWIM7–ZSWIM1, ZSWIM3–ZSWIM1, and ZSWIM3–ZSWIM7 (the weight indicators are equal 0.43–0.55) (Supplementary Table S12).
The biological mechanisms characteristic of the 12 breast-specific genes (we identified more than 60 of these pathways; Supplementary Table S13) are very like those identified for the above-mentioned 32 BC-involved genes (Supplementary Table S11) and are in a large part represented by metalloendopeptidase activity/extracellular matrix organization, etc. The breast-specific gene interactions (Figure 3) are mainly realized due to the overall domains of proteins (45.22%) and positional communications (38.04%) with the maximum weight index (0.52) of the CETP–PLTP genes paired interaction (Supplementary Table S14).

3. Discussion

In our report, we demonstrated the involvement of MMP gene polymorphisms in BC susceptibility in the Caucasian women of Russia. All examined ten SNPs of the MMP genes were BC-associated: two loci (c.836 A > G (rs17576) and c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) MMP9) showed an independent disease protective effect, eleven haplotypes of six SNPs MMP9 were mostly involved with BC risk, and thirteen SNP–SNP interaction simulated models are correlated with BC. Under in silico materials, BC susceptibility MMP polymorphic loci are located in functionally active regions of the breast genome, impact on epigenetic processes, and are regulators of gene expression/splicing.
Our results demonstrated a protective impact of the G allele (the C allele is risky) of SNP c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) MMP9 on BC formation, both independently (OR 0.67–0.71) and as part of eight haplotypes of the MMP9 gene. The relationship of c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) MMP9 with BC was considered in seven previously published works: four experimental studies (Malaysian, Chinese, and Jordanian populations were studied) [25,27,29,30] and three meta-analyses [20,21,22]. The association of this polymorphism with disease was demonstrated in two of these studies (one experiment performed in a Malaysian population [29] and one meta-analysis [21]). It should be emphasized that the GG genotype (OR 10.84) has a risk value for BC in Malaysian women [29] while in Caucasian women in Russia, the G allele exhibits a protective effect in relation to the disease (our data). The above data make it possible to suggest the presence of interethnic peculiarities (Asian/European) in the association of c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) MMP9 with BC; however, this assumption needs to be confirmed in further molecular and genetic studies.
Another MMP9 gene polymorphism independently associated with BC in Caucasian women of Russia, c.836 A > G (rs17576) (the G allele is protective, OR 0.82) also contributes to the risk of disorder within nine haplotypes of the MMP9 gene (the A allele is risky). Data from the literature on the association between c.836 A > G (rs17576) MMP9 and the disease are very contradictory. No associations of this locus with the disease were identified in two works [25,27] while opposite results (risk/protective value of polymorphism) were demonstrated in another three studies [29,31,32]. In three meta-analyses, significant associations of c.836 A > G (rs17576) MMP9 with breast cancer were not established [20,21,22]. Our data on the protective effect of the G allele (rs17576) on breast cancer in Caucasian women of Russia are consistent with the results of Resler et al., who studied white women of the Seattle metropolitan area (USA) [31], and contrast with the data obtained in Malaysian [29] and Brazilian [32] populations (according to their data, the G allele is risky).
We obtained interesting data in silico regarding the pronounced cell/organ-specific functional effects of c.836 A > G (rs17576) and c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) MMP9 in the mammary gland, which is a BC target organ. These BC risk loci (together with coupled SNPs) are involved in amino acid modification of MMP9 protein (p.Q279R and p.574P, respectively), epigenetic control gene activity due to enhancer- and promoter-driven transcriptions in primary epithelial and myoepithelial breast cells, and gene expression/splicing level regulation in BC-related organs (brain, adipose, adrenal gland, thyroid, blood, etc.). The above-stated SNPs’ functional actions may be the pathophysiological basis of these loci associations with BC.
The MMP9 protein (gelatinase B), resulting from the transcription of the gene of the same name, is a well-known multifunctional collagenase [33,34]. MMP9, due to its ability to destroy type IV collagen and denatured collagens, resulting in the destruction of basement membranes, is essential for the biology of tumors, including BC [34,35]. Importantly, MMP9 protein is constitutively expressed by breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231) [33]. The tumorigenic effects of MMP9 are realized in lots of ways, such as DNA degradation and accompanying molecular changes, epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell formation/support, matrix degradation, production and activation of matrix-associated and non-matrix cytokines, inflammatory tumor-related activity, cancer immunological monitoring regulation, change in the cyto-skeletal organization during tumorigenesis (tumor–stromal relationship, etc.), proliferation and invasion of cancer cells, effect on angiogenesis (apoptosis) factors, etc., which predetermines the fundamental role of this collagenase in BC progression and metastasis, relapse, and survival of disease-affected patients [34].
There is convincing evidence of an important prognostic value of the MMP9 expression level in BC patients [36,37]. As a result of a meta-analysis (based on data on 2344 women with BC from 15 studies), Song et al. showed a direct link between overexpression of MMP9 and both relapse-free and overall survival in BC patients [36]. The meta-analysis performed by Jiang et al. (the materials of 41 experimental studies, including 6517 BC patients, were used) not only shows the association of increased expression of MMP9 with a shorter overall survival of BC-affected women but also the association of high expression of MMP9 with other BC clinical (clinicopathological) signs such as histological grade, clinical stage, larger tumor sizes, and lymph node metastasis [37]. The literature suggest a link between an increased content of MMP9 protein and negative status of hormonal receptors and a higher tumor grade [35]. As a result of an experimental study of patients with primary early BC, higher expression of MMP9 in tumor cells was found in comparison with tumor-associated stroma and its correlation with a tumor cell proliferation index [38]. A higher level of MMP9 protein in the tumor than in normal tissue and its direct connection with increased tumor size were also reported in the work of Przybylowska et al. [12]. The expression of MMP9 protein concerns important regulators/markers of the cell cycle/ECM remodeling such as cell division control protein 42, epidermal growth factor and cell surface adhesion receptors, cytokeratin 17, and Ki67 proliferation biomarker [35]. The abovementioned data indicate the considerable putative clinical and pathophysiological significance of MMP9 in BC and, consequently, functionally meaningful polymorphisms of this gene may become important prognostic markers of this disease in the future.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Subjects

We enrolled 358 affected (BC) and 746 unaffected (cancer-free) women at the Belgorod Regional Oncological Dispensary and Belgorod Regional Clinical Hospital of St. Ioasaph from March 2010 to December 2016. All participants were Caucasian women who were born and living in central Russia [39,40]. BC diagnosis was histopathologically confirmed by certified pathologists. The control group were BC free (confirmed by mammography or breast ultrasound) without malignant tumor history and heavy disorder-related to the vital organs. We obtained ethical approval from the Human Investigation (Ethics) Committee of Belgorod State National Research University.

4.2. SNP Selection and Genotyping

We selected the phenol-chloroform method to obtain quality DNA extract from the peripheral venous blood samples (≈4–5 mL) [41]. DNA extraction was carried out according previously described procedure [42]. A Nanodrop 2000 was used to detect the DNA concentration and purity [43].
MMP gene SNPs associated with BC reported in more than 50 previous association studies [12,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] (Supplementary Table S15) and with potential regulatory functions (Supplementary Table S16) [44,45,46,47,48,49,50] were selected for our genetic–epidemiological study. As a result, 10 SNPs of the MMP genes were investigated in this study, including 6 loci of chromosome 20 (c.139-369 T > C (rs3918249) MMP9, c. 1331-163 G > A (rs3787268) MMP9, c.2003 G > A (rs17577) MMP9, c.-1562 C > T (rs3918242) MMP9, c.836 A > G (rs17576) MMP9, c. 1721 C > G (rs2250889) MMP9), 3 SNP of chromosome 11 (c.259 T > C (rs1940475) MMP8, c.133 C > T (rs679620) MMP3, c.-1607 2G > 1G (rs1799750) MMP1), and 1 locus of chromosome 16 (c.-1306 C > T (rs243865) MMP2).
The standard real-time PCR genotyping system (CFX96, Bio-Rad) was used to determine the genotypes of all participants (BC and cancer-free) [51]. Quality control was used in the genotyping procedure [52]. As a result, the percentage of genotyping errors did not exceed 0.5%.

4.3. Statistical Analysis

The SNP genotype frequencies in the BC and cancer-free subjects were analyzed separately to find out the compliance with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium [53]. Differences in the distribution of polymorphic variant frequencies between the BC and cancer-free groups were evaluated based on four common genetic models (recessive, additive, dominant, and allelic) by logistic regression [54] with age and BMI adjustment. Association links of genetic markers with BC were appreciated based on the indicators’ OR (odds ratio) and 95% CIs (confidence intervals for OR) [55]. The individual SNPs and their haplotype association analyses were executed using gPLINK software [56]. The MB-MDR and MDR methods and the corresponding software packages were utilized to evaluate the association of SNP interactions with BC [57] (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mdr, accessed on 18 June 2022). Among the many obtained simulation epistatic models for subsequent permutation procedures, we selected models corresponding to the level of statistical significance chosen by us according to the Bonferroni amendment (taking into account the 10 examined loci combinations), such as pinteract < 1.11 × 10−3 (<0.05/45) (2–locus models), pinteract < 4.17 × 10−4 (<0.05/120) (3–locus), pinteract < 2.38 ×10−4 (<0.05/210) (4–locus), and pinteract < 1.98 × 10−4 (<0.05/252) (5–locus). The association analysis results were corrected for multiple testing by a permutation test [58,59]. As a result, pperm value ≤ 0.05 for individual SNPs (adaptive permutations were carried out [54], their haplotypes, and SNP*SNP interactions (1000 permutations were done [60]) was recognized as the cutoff parameter for statistical significance.

4.4. SNPs and Genes Predict Functions

We examined in silico the prediction functions of BC-involved SNP MMP genes and their strongly linked variants (r2 equal to and more than 0.80) [61] based on the value widely used in human genetics bioinformatics resources such as GTExproject [62], PolyPhen-2 [63], HaploReg [64], Blood eQTL browser [65], SIFT [66], GeneMANIA [67], and Gene Ontology [68].

5. Conclusions

MMP gene polymorphisms located in functionally active genome regions in the mammary gland are related to BC susceptibility in the Caucasian women of Russia.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232012638/s1. References [69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.P., S.D., and I.P.; Data curation, N.P. and S.D.; Formal analysis, M.C. (Mikhail Churnosov), E.R., I.A., and I.P.; Project administration, M.C. (Mikhail Churnosov); Writing—original draft, N.P. and M.C. (Maria Churnosova); Writing—review and editing, M.C. (Mikhail Churnosov), E.R. and I.A. All authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Local Ethical Committee of the Belgorod State University (10 April 2008, No. 4).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gradishar, W.J.; Anderson, B.O.; Blair, S.L.; Burstein, H.J.; Cyr, A.; Elias, A.D.; Farrar, W.B.; Forero, A.; Giordano, S.H.; Goldstein, L.J.; et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Breast Cancer Panel. Breast cancer version 3.2014. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2014, 12, 542–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ferlay, J.; Colombet, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Parkin, D.M.; Piñeros, M.; Znaor, A.; Bray, F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int. J. Cancer 2021, 149, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Federal State Statistics Service. Healthcare in Russia 2021: Statistical Compendium; Federal State Statistics Service: Moscow, Russia, 2021; 171p.
  5. Kaprin, A.D.; Starinskij, V.V.; Petrova, G.V. Malignant Neoplasms in Russia in 2018; MNIOI im. P.A. Gercena: Moscow, Russia, 2019; 250p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Lilyquist, J.; Ruddy, K.J.; Vachon, C.M.; Couch, F.J. Common Genetic Variation and Breast Cancer Risk-Past, Present, and Future. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2018, 27, 380–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Shiovitz, S.; Korde, L.A. Genetics of breast cancer: A topic in evolution. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 1291–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Available online: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/search?query=breast%20carcinoma (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  9. Michailidou, K.; Lindström, S.; Dennis, J.; Beesley, J.; Hui, S.; Kar, S.; Lemaçon, A.; Soucy, P.; Glubb, D.; Rostamianfar, A.; et al. Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci. Nature 2017, 551, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mucci, L.A.; Hjelmborg, J.B.; Harris, J.R.; Czene, K.; Havelick, D.J.; Scheike, T.; Graff, R.E.; Holst, K.; Möller, S.; Unger, R.H.; et al. Nordic Twin Study of Cancer (NorTwinCan) Collaboration. Familial Risk and Heritability of Cancer Among Twins in Nordic Countries [published correction appears in JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):822]. JAMA 2016, 315, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dofara, S.G.; Chang, S.L.; Diorio, C. Gene polymorphisms and circulating levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9: A review of their role in breast cancer risk. Anticancer Res. 2020, 40, 3619–3631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Przybylowska, K.; Kluczna, A.; Zadrozny, M.; Krawczyk, T.; Kulig, A.; Rykala, J.; Kolacinska, A.; Morawiec, Z.; Drzewoski, J.; Blasiak, J. Polymorphisms of the promoter regions of matrix metalloproteinases genes MMP-1 and MMP-9 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2006, 95, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Radisky, E.S.; Radisky, D.C. Matrix metalloproteinases as breast cancer drivers and therapeutic targets. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 2015, 20, 1144–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Eiro, N.; Gonzalez, L.O.; Fraile, M.; Cid, S.; Schneider, J.; Vizoso, F.J. Breast Cancer Tumor Stroma: Cellular Components, Phenotypic Heterogeneity, Intercellular Communication, Prognostic Implications and Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers 2019, 11, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Baker, E.A.; Stephenson, T.J.; Reed, M.W.; Brown, N.J. Expression of proteinases and inhibitors in human breast cancer progression and survival. Mol. Pathol. 2002, 55, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. McColgan, P.; Sharma, P. Polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinases 1, 2, 3 and 9 and susceptibility to lung, breast and colorectal cancer in over 30,000 subjects. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 125, 1473–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhou, P.; Du, L.F.; Lv, G.Q.; Yu, X.M.; Gu, Y.L.; Li, J.P.; Zhang, C. Current evidence on the relationship between four polymorphisms in the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) gene and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 127, 813–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, D.; Guo, H.; Li, Y.; Xu, X.; Yang, K.; Bai, Y. Association between polymorphisms in the promoter regions of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and risk of cancer metastasis: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Białkowska, K.; Marciniak, W.; Muszyńska, M.; Baszuk, P.; Gupta, S.; Jaworska-Bieniek, K.; Sukiennicki, G.; Durda, K.; Gromowski, T.; Lener, M.; et al. Polymorphisms in MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-13 and MT2A do not contribute to breast, lung and colon cancer risk in polish population. Hered. Cancer Clin. Pract. 2020, 18, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, X.; Jin, G.; Li, J.; Zhang, L. Association between four MMP-9 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2015, 21, 1115–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Xu, T.; Zhang, S.; Qiu, D.; Li, X.; Fan, Y. Association between matrix metalloproteinase 9 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: An updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Gene 2020, 759, 144972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yan, C.; Sun, C.; Lu, D.; Zhao, T.; Ding, X.; Zamir, I.; Tang, M.; Shao, C.; Zhang, F. Estimation of associations between MMP9 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Int. J. Biol. Markers 2022, 37, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lei, H.; Hemminki, K.; Altieri, A.; Johansson, R.; Enquist, K.; Hallmans, G.; Lenner, P.; Försti, A. Promoter polymorphisms in matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors: Few associations with breast cancer susceptibility and progression. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2007, 103, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Roehe, A.V.; Frazzon, A.P.; Agnes, G.; Damin, A.P.; Hartman, A.A.; Graudenz, M.S. Detection of polymorphisms in the promoters of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 genes in breast cancer in South Brazil: Preliminary results. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2007, 102, 123–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Beeghly-Fadiel, A.; Lu, W.; Shu, X.O.; Long, J.; Cai, Q.; Xiang, Y.; Gao, Y.T.; Zheng, W. MMP9 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: A report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Genetics Study. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 126, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Shevchenko, A.V.; Konenkov, V.I.; EIu, G.; Stakheeva, M.N. Associating of polymorphism in the promoter regions of genes of metalloproteinase (MMP2, MMP3, MMP9) with options of the clinical course of breast cancer in Russian women. Vopr. Onkol. 2014, 60, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Fu, F.; Wang, C.; Chen, L.M.; Huang, M.; Huang, H.G. The influence of functional polymorphisms in matrix metalloproteinase 9 on survival of breast cancer patients in a Chinese population. DNA Cell Biol. 2013, 32, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Beeghly-Fadiel, A.; Cai, Q.; Lu, W.; Long, J.; Gao, Y.T.; Shu, X.O.; Zheng, W. No association between matrix metalloproteinase-1 or matrix metalloproteinase-3 polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility: A report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2009, 18, 1324–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chahil, J.K.; Munretnam, K.; Samsudin, N.; Lye, S.H.; Hashim, N.A.; Ramzi, N.H.; Velapasamy, S.; Wee, L.L.; Alex, L. Genetic polymorphisms associated with breast cancer in malaysian cohort. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2015, 30, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Al-Eitan, L.N.; Jamous, R.I.; Khasawneh, R.H. Candidate Gene Analysis of Breast Cancer in the Jordanian Population of Arab Descent: A Case-Control Study. Cancer Investig. 2017, 35, 256–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Resler, A.J.; Malone, K.E.; Johnson, L.G.; Malkki, M.; Petersdorf, E.W.; McKnight, B.; Madeleine, M.M. Genetic variation in TLR or NFkappaB pathways and the risk of breast cancer: A case-control study. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Oliveira, V.A.; Chagas, D.C.; Amorim, J.R.; Pereira, R.O.; Nogueira, T.A.; Borges, V.; Campos-Verde, L.M.; Martins, L.M.; Rodrigues, G.P.; Nery Júnior, E.J.; et al. Association between matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene polymorphism and breast cancer in Brazilian women. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2020, 75, e1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Van den Steen, P.E.; Dubois, B.; Nelissen, I.; Rudd, P.M.; Dwek, R.A.; Opdenakker, G. Biochemistry and Molecular biology of gelatinase B or matrix metalloproteinase-9 (gelatinase B/MMP-9). Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 37, 375–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Farina, A.R.; Mackay, A.R. Gelatinase B/MMP-9 in Tumour Pathogenesis and Progression. Cancers 2014, 6, 240–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Joseph, C.; Alsaleem, M.; Orah, N.; Narasimha, P.L.; Miligy, I.M.; Kurozumi, S.; Ellis, I.O.; Mongan, N.P.; Green, A.R.; Rakha, E.A. Elevated MMP9 expression in breast cancer is a predictor of shorter patient survival. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2020, 182, 267–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Song, J.; Su, H.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Guo, L.L. Prognostic value of matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression in breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2013, 14, 1615–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jiang, H.; Li, H. Prognostic values of tumoral MMP2 and MMP9 overexpression in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kalavska, K.; Cierna, Z.; Karaba, M.; Minarik, G.; Benca, J.; Sedlackova, T.; Kolekova, D.; Mrvova, I.; Pindak, D.; Mardiak, J.; et al. Prognostic role of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in early breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2021, 21, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Reshetnikov, E.A.; Akulova, L.Y.; Dobrodomova, I.S.; Dvornyk, V.Y.; Polonikov, A.V.; Churnosov, M.I. The insertion-deletion polymorphism of the ACE gene is associated with increased blood pressure in women at the end of pregnancy. J. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Syst. 2015, 16, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ponomarenko, I.; Reshetnikov, E.; Polonikov, A.; Sorokina, I.; Yermachenko, A.; Dvornyk, V.; Churnosov, M. Candidate genes for age at menarche are associated with endometriosis. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2020, 41, 943–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reshetnikov, E.; Zarudskaya, O.; Polonikov, A.; Bushueva, O.; Orlova, V.; Krikun, E.; Dvornyk, V.; Churnosov, M. Genetic markers for inherited thrombophilia are associated with fetal growth retardation in the population of Central Russia. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2017, 43, 1139–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Eliseeva, N.; Ponomarenko, I.; Reshetnikov, E.; Dvornyk, V.; Churnosov, M. LOXL1 gene polymorphism candidates for exfoliation glaucoma are also associated with a risk for primary open-angle glaucoma in a Caucasian population from central Russia. Mol. Vis. 2021, 27, 262–269. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ponomarenko, I.; Reshetnikov, E.; Altuchova, O.; Polonikov, A.; Sorokina, I.; Yermachenko, A.; Dvornyk, V.; Golovchenko, O.; Churnosov, M. Association of genetic polymorphisms with age at menarche in Russian women. Gene 2019, 686, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Moskalenko, M.I.; Milanova, S.N.; Ponomarenko, I.V.; Polonikov, A.V.; Churnosov, M.I. Study of associations of polymorphism of matrix metalloproteinases genes with the development of arterial hypertension in men. Kardiologiia 2019, 59, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Polonikov, A.; Rymarova, L.; Klyosova, E.; Volkova, A.; Azarova, I.; Bushueva, O.; Bykanova, M.; Bocharova, I.; Zhabin, S.; Churnosov, M.; et al. Matrix metalloproteinases as target genes for gene regulatory networks driving molecular and cellular pathways related to a multistep pathogenesis of cerebrovascular disease. J. Cell Biochem. 2019, 10, 16467–16482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Minyaylo, O.N. Allele distribution and haploblock structure of matrix metalloproteinase gene polymorphism in patients with H. pylori-negative gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. Res. Results Biomed. 2020, 6, 488–502. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Svinareva, D.I. The contribution of gene-gene interactions of polymorphic loci of matrix metalloproteinases to susceptibility to primary open-angle glaucoma in men. Res. Results Biomed. 2020, 6, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Minyaylo, O.; Ponomarenko, I.; Reshetnikov, E.; Dvornyk, V.; Churnosov, M. Functionally significant polymorphisms of the MMP-9 gene are associated with peptic ulcer disease in the Caucasian population of Central Russia. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Moskalenko, M.; Ponomarenko, I.; Reshetnikov, E.; Dvornyk, V.; Churnosov, M. Polymorphisms of the matrix metalloproteinase genes are associated with essential hypertension in a Caucasian population of Central Russia. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Starikova, D.; Ponomarenko, I.; Reshetnikov, E.; Dvornyk, V.; Churnosov, M. Novel data about association of the functionally significant polymorphisms of the MMP9 gene with exfoliation glaucoma in the caucasian population of Central Russia. Ophthalmic Res. 2021, 64, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tikunova, E.; Ovtcharova, V.; Reshetnikov, E.; Dvornyk, V.; Polonikov, A.; Bushueva, O.; Churnosov, M. Genes of tumor necrosis factors and their receptors and the primary open angle glaucoma in the population of Central Russia. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 10, 1490–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Golovchenko, O.; Abramova, M.; Ponomarenko, I.; Reshetnikov, E.; Aristova, I.; Polonikov, A.; Dvornyk, V.; Churnosov, M. Functionally significant polymorphisms of ESR1and PGR and risk of intrauterine growth restriction in population of Central Russia. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 253, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bushueva, O.; Solodilova, M.; Churnosov, M.; Ivanov, V.; Polonikov, A. The Flavin-Containing Monooxygenase 3 Gene and Essential Hypertension: The Joint Effect of Polymorphism E158K and Cigarette Smoking on Disease Susceptibility. Int. J. Hypertens. 2014, 2014, 712169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Sirotina, S.; Ponomarenko, I.; Kharchenko, A.; Bykanova, M.; Bocharova, A.; Vagaytseva, K.; Stepanov, V.; Churnosov, M.; Solodilova, M.; Polonikov, A. A Novel Polymorphism in the Promoter of the CYP4A11 Gene Is Associated with Susceptibility to Coronary Artery Disease. Dis. Markers 2018, 2018, 5812802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Reshetnikov, E.; Ponomarenko, I.; Golovchenko, O.; Sorokina, I.; Batlutskaya, I.; Yakunchenko, T.; Dvornyk, V.; Polonikov, A.; Churnosov, M. The VNTR polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and blood pressure in women at the end of pregnancy. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 58, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-Brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.; Bender, D.; Maller, J.; Sklar, P.; de Bakker, P.I.; Daly, M.J.; et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Polonikov, A.V.; Bushueva, O.Y.; Bulgakova, I.V.; Freidin, M.B.; Churnosov, M.I.; Solodilova, M.A.; Shvetsov, Y.D.; Ivanov, V.P. A comprehensive contribution of genes for aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling pathway to hypertension susceptibility. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2017, 2, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Churnosov, M.; Abramova, M.; Reshetnikov, E.; Lyashenko, I.V.; Efremova, O.; Churnosova, M.; Ponomarenko, I. Polymorphisms of hypertension susceptibility genes as a risk factors of preeclampsia in the Caucasian population of central Russia. Placenta 2022, 129, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Che, R.; Jack, J.R.; Motsinger-Reif, A.A.; Brown, C.C. An adaptive permutation approach for genome-wide association study: Evaluation and recommendations for use. BioData Min. 2014, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ponomarenko, I.; Reshetnikov, E.; Polonikov, A.; Sorokina, I.; Yermachenko, A.; Dvornyk, V.; Churnosov, M. Candidate genes for age at menarche are associated with endometrial hyperplasia. Gene 2020, 757, 4933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ponomarenko, I.; Reshetnikov, E.; Polonikov, A.; Verzilina, I.; Sorokina, I.; Yermachenko, A.; Dvornyk, V.; Churnosov, M. Candidate genes for age at menarche are associated with uterine leiomyoma. Front. Genet. 2021, 11, 512940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. GTEx Consortium. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 2020, 36, 1318–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Adzhubei, I.; Jordan, D.M.; Sunyaev, S.R. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 2013, 76, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ward, L.D.; Kellis, M. HaploReg v4: Systematic mining of putative causal variants, cell types, regulators and target genes for human complex traits and disease. Nucleic. Acids Res. 2016, 44, D877–D881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Westra, H.J.; Peters, M.J.; Esko, T.; Yaghootkar, H.; Schurmann, C.; Kettunen, J.; Christiansen, M.W.; Fairfax, B.P.; Schramm, K.; Powell, J.E.; et al. Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1238–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Kumar, P.; Henikoff, S.; Ng, P.C. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 7, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Franz, M.; Rodriguez, H.; Lopes, C.; Zuberi, K.; Montojo, J.; Bader, G.D.; Morris, Q. GeneMANIA update 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W60–W64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Ontology resource: Enriching a GOld mine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D325–D334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ibrahim, F.A.E.R.; Elfeky, S.E.; Haroun, M.; Ahmed, M.A.E.; Elnaggar, M.; Ismail, N.A.E.; El Moneim, N.A.A. Association of matrix metalloproteinases 3 and 9 single nucleotide polymorphisms with breast cancer risk: A case-control study. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 13, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. AbdRaboh, N.R.; Bayoumi, F.A. Gene polymorphism of matrix metalloproteinases 3 and 9 in breast cancer. Gene Rep. 2016, 5, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Balkhi, S.; Mashayekhi, F.; Salehzadeh, A.; Saedi, H.S. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and MMP-3 gene variations affect MMP-1 and -3 serum concentration and associates with breast cancer. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 9637–9644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bargostavan, M.H.; Eslami, G.; Esfandiari, N.; Shahemabadi, A.S. MMP9 Promoter Polymorphism (−1562 C/T) Does not Affect the Serum Levels of Soluble MICB and MICA in Breast Cancer. Iran. J. Immunol. IJI 2016, 13. [Google Scholar]
  73. Beeghly-Fadiel, A.; Lu, W.; Long, J.R.; Shu, X.O.; Zheng, Y.; Cai, Q.; Gao, Y.; Zheng, W. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2009, 18, 1770–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Biondi, M.L.; Turri, O.; Leviti, S.; Seminati, R.; Cecchini, F.; Bernini, M.; Ghilardi, G.; Guagnellini, E. MMP1 and MMP3 polymorphisms in promoter regions and cancer. Clin. Chem. 2000, 46, 2023–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Chan, S.C. Identification and analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in matrix metallopeptidase 2 and 3 genes in Malaysian breast cancer patients. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  76. Chiranjeevi, P.; Spurthi, K.M.; Rani, N.S.; Kumar, G.R.; Aiyengar, T.M.; Saraswati, M.; Srilatha, G.; Kumar, G.K.; Sinha, S.; Kumari, C.S.; et al. Gelatinase B (−1562C/T) polymorphism in tumor progression and invasion of breast cancer. Tumor Biol. 2013, 35, 1351–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Decock, J.; Long, J.-R.; Laxton, R.C.; Shu, X.-O.; Hodgkinson, C.; Hendrickx, W.; Pearce, E.G.; Gao, Y.-T.; Pereira, A.C.; Paridaens, R.; et al. Association of Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Gene Variation with Breast Cancer Prognosis. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 10214–10221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Delgado-Enciso, I.; Cepeda-Lopez, F.R.; Monrroy-Guizar, E.A.; Bautista-Lam, J.R.; Andrade-Soto, M.; Jonguitud-Olguin, G.; Rodriguez-Hernandez, A.; Anaya-Ventura, A.; Baltazar-Rodriguez, L.M.; Orozco-Ruiz, M.; et al. Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Promoter Polymorphism Is Associated with Breast Cancer in a Mexican Population. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2007, 65, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Felizi, R.T.; Veiga, M.G.; Filho, I.C.; Souto, R.P.D.; Fernandes, C.E.; Oliveira, E. Association between Matrix Metallopeptidase 9 Polymorphism and Breast Cancer Risk. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2018, 40, 620–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ghilardi, G.; Biondi, M.L.; Caputo, M.; Leviti, S.; DeMonti, M.; Guagnellini, E.; Scorza, R. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the matrix metalloproteinase-3 promoter enhances breast cancer susceptibility. Clin. Cancer Res. 2002, 8, 3820–3823. [Google Scholar]
  81. Habel, A.F.; Ghali, R.M.; Bouaziz, H.; Daldoul, A.; Hadj-Ahmed, M.; Mokrani, A.; Zaied, S.; Hechiche, M.; Rahal, K.; Yacoubi-Loueslati, B.; et al. Common matrix metalloproteinase-2 gene variants and altered susceptibility to breast cancer and associated features in Tunisian women. Tumor Biol. 2019, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Hsiao, C.-L.; Liu, L.-C.; Shih, T.-C.; Lai, Y.-L.; Hsu, S.-W.; Wang, H.-C.; Pan, S.-Y.; Shen, T.-C.; Tsai, C.-W.; Chang, W.-S.; et al. The Association of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Promoter Polymorphisms with Breast Cancer. Vivo 2018, 32, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Hughes, S.; Agbaje, O.; Bowen, R.L.; Holliday, D.L.; Shaw, J.A.; Duffy, S.; Jones, J.L. Matrix Metalloproteinase Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Haplotypes Predict Breast Cancer Progression. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 6673–6680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Ledwon, J.; Hennig, E.E.; Maryan, N.; Goryca, K.; Nowakowska, D.; Niwińska, A.; Ostrowski, J. Common low-penetrance risk variants associated with breast cancer in Polish women. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Manshadi, Z.D.; Hamid, M.; Kosari, F.; Tayebinia, H.; Khodadadi, I. The Relationship between Matrix Metalloproteinase Gene Polymorphisms and Tumor Type, Tumor Size, and Metastasis in Women with Breast Cancer in Central Iran. Middle East J. Cancer 2018, 9, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mavaddat, N.; Dunning, A.M.; Ponder, B.A.; Easton, D.F.; Pharoah, P.D. Common Genetic Variation in Candidate Genes and Susceptibility to Subtypes of Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2009, 18, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Ben Néjima, D.; Ben Zarkouna, Y.; Gammoudi, A.; Manai, M.; Boussen, H. Prognostic impact of polymorphism of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and metalloproteinase tissue inhibitor-2 promoters in breast cancer in Tunisia: Case-control study. Tumor Biol. 2015, 36, 3815–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Ou, Y.-X.; Bi, R. Meta-analysis on the relationship between the SNP of MMP-2-1306 C>T and susceptibility to breast cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacl. Sci. 2020, 24, 1264–1270. [Google Scholar]
  89. Padala, C.; Tupurani, M.A.; Puranam, K.; Gantala, S.; Shyamala, N.; Kondapalli, M.S.; Gundapaneni, K.K.; Mudigonda, S.; Galimudi, R.K.; Kupsal, K.; et al. Synergistic effect of collagenase-1 (MMP1), stromelysin-1 (MMP3) and gelatinase-B (MMP9) gene polymorphisms in breast cancer. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Pharoah, P.D.P.; Tyrer, J.; Dunning, A.M.; Easton, D.F.; Ponder, B.A.J. SEARCH Investigators Association between Common Variation in 120 Candidate Genes and Breast Cancer Risk. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3, e42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Przybylowska, K.; Zielinska, J.; Zadrozny, M.; Krawczyk, T.; Kulig, A.; Wozniak, P.; Rykala, J.; Kolacinska, A.; Morawiec, Z.; Drzewoski, J.; et al. An association between the matrix metalloproteinase 1 promoter gene polymorphism and lymphnode metastasis in breast cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 23, 121–125. [Google Scholar]
  92. Rahimi, Z.; Yari, K.; Rahimi, Z. Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 -1562T Allele and its Combination with MMP-2 -735 C Allele are Risk Factors for Breast Cancer. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015, 16, 1175–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Sadeghi, M.; Motovali Bashi, M.; Hojati, Z. MMP-9 promoter polymorphism associated with tumor progression of breast cancer in Iranian population. Int. J. Integr. Biology. 2009, 6, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  94. Saeed, H.M.; Alanazi, M.S.; Alshahrani, O.; Parine, N.R.; Alabdulkarim, H.A.; Shalaby, M. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 C(-1306)T promoter polymorphism and breast cancer risk in the Saudi population. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2013, 60, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Slattery, M.L.; John, E.; Torres-Mejia, G.; Stern, M.; Lundgreen, A.; Hines, L.; Giuliano, A.; Baumgartner, K.; Herrick, J.; Wolff, R.K. Matrix Metalloproteinase Genes Are Associated with Breast Cancer Risk and Survival: The Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Su, C.-H.; Lane, H.-Y.; Hsiao, C.-L.; Liu, L.-C.; Ji, H.-X.; Li, H.-T.; Yen, S.-T.; Su, C.-H.; Hsia, T.-C.; Chang, W.-S.; et al. Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Genetic Polymorphism in Breast Cancer in Taiwanese. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 3341–3345. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Sui, J.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Y. The MMP-1 Gene rs1799750 Polymorphism Is Associated with Breast Cancer Risk. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomark. 2021, 25, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Toroghi, F.; Mashayekhi, F.; Montazeri, V.; Saedi, H.S.; Salehi, Z. Association of MMP-9 promoter polymorphism and breast cancer among Iranian patients. Eur. J. Oncol. 2017, 1, 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  99. Wang, K.; Zhou, Y.; Li, G.; Wen, X.; Kou, Y.; Yu, J.; He, H.; Zhao, Q.; Xue, F.; Wang, J.; et al. MMP8 and MMP9 gene polymorphisms were associated with breast cancer risk in a Chinese Han population. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Yang, L.; Li, N.; Wang, S.; Kong, Y.; Tang, H.; Xie, X.; Xie, X. Lack of association between the matrix metalloproteinase-2 -1306C>T polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014, 15, 4823–4827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Zagouri, F.; Sergentanis, T.N.; Gazouli, M.; Dimitrakakis, C.; Tsigginou, A.; Papaspyrou, I.; Chrysikos, D.; Lymperi, M.; Zografos, G.C.; Antsaklis, A.; et al. MMP-2 −1306C > T polymorphism in breast cancer: A case-control study in a South European population. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 5035–5040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zhou, Y.; Yu, C.; Miao, X.; Tan, W.; Liang, G.; Xiong, P.; Sun, T.; Lin, N. Substantial reduction in risk of breast cancer associated with genetic polymorphisms in the promoters of the matrix metalloproteinase-2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 genes. Carcinogenesis 2003, 25, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhou, Z.; Ma, X.; Wang, F.; Sun, L.; Zhang, G. A Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Polymorphism, MMP1–1607(1G>2G), Is Associated with Increased Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis Including 21,327 Patients. Dis. Mrk. 2018, 2018, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 12638 g001 550
Figure 1. Entropy graph of the SNP × SNP interactions with breast cancer based on the MDR analysis. Positive entropy values indicate synergistic interactions while negative values indicate redundancy. The red and orange colors denote strong and moderate synergism, respectively; the brown color denotes an independent effect.
Figure 1. Entropy graph of the SNP × SNP interactions with breast cancer based on the MDR analysis. Positive entropy values indicate synergistic interactions while negative values indicate redundancy. The red and orange colors denote strong and moderate synergism, respectively; the brown color denotes an independent effect.
Ijms 23 12638 g001
Ijms 23 12638 g002 550
Figure 2. The interaction networks of the candidate genes for breast cancer in various tissues/organs inferred using GeneMANIA (http://genemania.org, accessed on 18 June 2022). The candidate genes are cross-shaded.
Figure 2. The interaction networks of the candidate genes for breast cancer in various tissues/organs inferred using GeneMANIA (http://genemania.org, accessed on 18 June 2022). The candidate genes are cross-shaded.
Ijms 23 12638 g002
Ijms 23 12638 g003 550
Figure 3. The interaction networks of the breast cancer candidate genes that are functionally significant for breast tissue inferred using GeneMANIA (http://genemania.org, accessed on 18 June 2022). The candidate genes are cross-shaded.
Figure 3. The interaction networks of the breast cancer candidate genes that are functionally significant for breast tissue inferred using GeneMANIA (http://genemania.org, accessed on 18 June 2022). The candidate genes are cross-shaded.
Ijms 23 12638 g003
Table
Table 1. Phenotypic characteristics of the study participants.
Table 1. Phenotypic characteristics of the study participants.
ParametersBC Patients, % (n)Controls,% (n)p
N358746-
Age, years
(min–max)		55.74 ± 12.79
(28–84)		55.29 ± 12.27
(30–82)		0.54
<50 years33.80 (121)35.12 (262)0.72
≥50 years66.20 (237)64.88 (484)
BMI, kg/m230.27 ± 6.1328.19 ± 5.730.003
Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) (yes)33.24 (119)25.47 (190)0.01
Age at menarche, years12.42 ± 1.1212.64 ± 1.140.58
Age at menopause, years48.27 ± 5.0247.97 ± 4.910.48
Mensuration status
Premenopause31.84 (114)34.05 (254)0.51
Postmenopause68.16 (244)65.95 (492)
Smoker (yes)22.07 (79)18.77 (140)0.22
Clinicopathological parameters of BC patients
Stage of the cancerT0–T2—74%, T3–T4—26%
Lymph node involvement (N)negative—47%, positive—53%
Estrogen receptor (ER)negative—34%, positive—66%
Progesterone receptor (PR)negative—41%, positive—59%
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)negative—64%, positive—36%
Triple negative22%
Tumor histological typeductal—94%, lobular—6%
Tumor histological grade (G)G1/G2—68%, G3—32%
Progressionabsent—66%, present—34%
Metastasisabsent—78%, present—22%
Deathabsent—81%, present—19%
Note: G1—well differentiated; G2—moderately differentiated; G3—poorly differentiated.
Table
Table 2. Associations of the studied gene polymorphisms with breast cancer.
Table 2. Associations of the studied gene polymorphisms with breast cancer.
SNPGeneMinor AllelenAllelic ModelAdditive ModelDominant ModelRecessive Model
OR95%CIpOR95%CIpOR95%CIpOR95%CIp
L95U95L95U95L95U95L95U95
rs1799750MMP-12G10771.020.851.220.8311.050.871.250.6261.160.871.540.3250.960.701.320.811
rs243865MMP-2T10820.930.751.150.4910.950.771.180.6511.010.781.320.9220.680.381.200.185
rs679620MMP-3T10950.900.761.080.2670.870.721.050.1350.880.651.180.3810.780.571.060.117
rs1940475MMP-8T10960.970.811.160.7421.000.841.200.9891.220.911.640.1890.810.601.100.185
rs3918242MMP-9T10891.020.801.300.8691.040.821.330.7440.960.731.280.8021.820.903.700.097
rs3918249MMP-9C10830.880.731.060.1800.900.751.090.2940.830.631.080.1610.970.681.400.890
rs17576MMP-9G10950.820.680.990.0350.840.701.010.0680.780.601.010.0630.820.571.190.302
rs3787268MMP-9A10891.110.891.370.3521.110.891.380.3501.050.801.360.7461.680.952.960.074
rs2250889MMP-9G10900.710.520.970.0330.690.510.950.0240.670.470.950.0260.540.181.670.286
rs17577MMP-9A10790.970.761.230.7980.980.771.250.8500.920.691.220.5561.410.692.850.343
Note: OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; p values < 0.05 are shown in bold; all results were obtained after adjustment for covariates.
Table
Table 3. Significance associations of the MMP-9 gene haplotypes with breast cancer risk.
Table 3. Significance associations of the MMP-9 gene haplotypes with breast cancer risk.
SNPsHaplotypeFrequencyORpraw valuepperm
Cases Controls
risk effect
rs17576-rs3787268AA0.03770.01862.460.0040.020
rs17576-rs3787268-rs2250889AAC0.03580.01792.530.0010.012
rs3918249-rs17576-rs3787268TAA0.02540.01102.890.0040.034
rs17576-rs3787268-rs2250889-rs17577AACG0.03750.01712.680.0030.020
rs3918249-rs17576-rs3787268-rs2250889TAAC0.02460.01023.210.0040.031
rs3918242-rs3918249-rs17576-rs3787268CTAA0.02520.01013.070.0050.032
rs3918249-rs17576-rs3787268-rs2250889-rs17577TAACG0.02630.00953.630.0030.016
rs3918242-rs3918249-rs17576-rs3787268-rs2250889CTAAC0.02470.00923.550.0020.016
rs3918242-rs3918249-rs17576-rs3787268-rs2250889-rs17577CTAACG0.02470.00903.260.0030.046
protective effect
rs3787268-rs2250889GG0.06930.10110.630.0130.032
rs3787268-rs2250889-rs17577GGG0.07100.09940.660.0170.050
Note: OR: odds ratio; p: significance level; all results were obtained after adjustment for covariates.
Table
Table 4. SNP × SNP interactions significantly associated with breast cancer.
Table 4. SNP × SNP interactions significantly associated with breast cancer.
NSNP × SNP Interaction ModelsNHbeta HWHNLbeta LWLpperm
Two-order interaction models (p < 1.02 × 10−3)
1rs17577 MMP9 × rs3918242 MMP921.58929.731−0.4347.15<0.001
2rs1799750 MMP1 × rs17576 MMP920.50213.581−0.6088.240.004
3rs17577 MMP9 × rs17576 MMP921.25612.470--0.005
4rs1799750 MMP1 × rs679620 MMP320.4137.381−0.78812.650.011
5rs2250889 MMP9 × rs243865 MMP20--2−0.67410.790.011
Three-order interaction models (p < 2.15 × 10−7)
1rs17577 MMP9 × rs3918242 MMP9 × rs1940475 MMP861.62032.651−0.5363.11<0.001
2rs17577 MMP9 × rs3918242 MMP9 × rs243865 MMP241.65431.111−0.7027.13<0.001
3rs17577 MMP9 × rs3787268 MMP9 × rs3918242 MMP941.54527.672−0.4527.67<0.001
4rs17577 MMP9 × rs1799750 MMP1 × rs3918242 MMP951.64027.522−0.91814.91<0.001
5rs17577 MMP9 × rs3918242 MMP9 × rs679620 MMP351.53827.381−1.18910.40<0.001
6rs17577 MMP9 × rs2250889 MMP9 × rs3918242 MMP941.62026.901−0.3524.22<0.001
Four-order interaction models (p < 9.93 × 10−8)
1rs17577 MMP9 × rs3787268 MMP9 × rs3918242 MMP9 × rs243865 MMP271.34128.392−0.7027.13<0.001
2rs1799750 MMP1 × rs3918249 MMP9 × rs194047 MMP8 × rs243865 MMP260.99330.901−1.0863.94<0.001
Five-order interaction models (p = 2.96 × 10−12)
1rs2250889 MMP9 × rs1799750 MMP1 × rs3918249 MMP9 × rs1940475 MMP8 × rs243865 MMP291.30848.710--<0.001
Note: NH: number of significant high risk genotypes in the interaction; beta H: regression coefficient for high-risk exposition in the step 2 analysis; WH: Wald statistic for the high-risk category; NL: number of significant low-risk genotypes in the interaction; beta L: regression coefficient for low-risk exposition in the step 2 analysis; WL: Wald statistic for the low-risk category; pperm: permutation p-value for the interaction model (1.000 permutations); the results were obtained using the MB-MDR method with adjustment for covariates.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pavlova, N.; Demin, S.; Churnosov, M.; Reshetnikov, E.; Aristova, I.; Churnosova, M.; Ponomarenko, I. Matrix Metalloproteinase Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Breast Cancer in the Caucasian Women of Russia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012638

AMA Style

Pavlova N, Demin S, Churnosov M, Reshetnikov E, Aristova I, Churnosova M, Ponomarenko I. Matrix Metalloproteinase Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Breast Cancer in the Caucasian Women of Russia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(20):12638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pavlova, Nadezhda, Sergey Demin, Mikhail Churnosov, Evgeny Reshetnikov, Inna Aristova, Maria Churnosova, and Irina Ponomarenko. 2022. "Matrix Metalloproteinase Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Breast Cancer in the Caucasian Women of Russia" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 20: 12638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop