Next Article in Journal
Cell-Free Hemoglobin in Acute Kidney Injury after Lung Transplantation and Experimental Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion
Next Article in Special Issue
An Integration of Linkage Mapping and GWAS Reveals the Key Genes for Ear Shank Length in Maize
Previous Article in Journal
Preventive Effect of Probiotics on Oral Mucositis Induced by Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Construction of a High-Density Recombination Bin-Based Genetic Map Facilitates High-Resolution Mapping of a Major QTL Underlying Anthocyanin Pigmentation in Eggplant
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Membrane Proteomic Profiling of Soybean Leaf and Root Tissues Uncovers Salt-Stress-Responsive Membrane Proteins

1
Centre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
2
Centre of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology (CABB), University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
3
Department of Biochemistry & Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
4
Proteomics Shared Resource, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA
5
Seed Center, Ministry of Environment, Water & Agriculture, Riyadh 14712, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(21), 13270; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113270
Submission received: 4 October 2022 / Revised: 24 October 2022 / Accepted: 25 October 2022 / Published: 31 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Power Up Plant Genetic Research with Genomic Data)

Abstract

:
Cultivated soybean (Glycine max (L.)), the world’s most important legume crop, has high-to-moderate salt sensitivity. Being the frontier for sensing and controlling solute transport, membrane proteins could be involved in cell signaling, osmoregulation, and stress-sensing mechanisms, but their roles in abiotic stresses are still largely unknown. By analyzing salt-induced membrane proteomic changes in the roots and leaves of salt-sensitive soybean cultivar (C08) seedlings germinated under NaCl, we detected 972 membrane proteins, with those present in both leaves and roots annotated as receptor kinases, calcium-sensing proteins, abscisic acid receptors, cation and anion channel proteins, proton pumps, amide and peptide transporters, and vesicle transport-related proteins etc. Endocytosis, linoleic acid metabolism, and fatty acid biosynthesis pathway-related proteins were enriched in roots whereas phagosome, spliceosome and soluble NSF attachment protein receptor (SNARE) interaction-related proteins were enriched in leaves. Using label-free quantitation, 129 differentially expressed membrane proteins were found in both tissues upon NaCl treatment. Additionally, the 140 NaCl-induced proteins identified in roots and 57 in leaves are vesicle-, mitochondrial-, and chloroplast-associated membrane proteins and those with functions related to ion transport, protein transport, ATP hydrolysis, protein folding, and receptor kinases, etc. Our proteomic results were verified against corresponding gene expression patterns from published C08 RNA-seq data, demonstrating the importance of solute transport and sensing in salt stress responses.

1. Introduction

Soil salinity is one of the most important environmental factors limiting plant growth and productivity throughout the world [1]. Excessive sodium in the soil inhibits the absorption of mineral nutrients and moisture, leading to the accumulation of toxic ions in plants. Plants employ several strategies to cope with salt stress at the cellular and subcellular levels. Cellular responses in plants to salinity require a new state of cellular homeostasis. These include regulating the expression of specific proteins for the reestablishment of proper cellular ion and osmotic homeostasis with other concomitant processes of repair and detoxification [2]. The salt signal is primarily perceived through roots, which rapidly respond to maintain function and transmit signals to the shoot for appropriate changes in function [3]. The regulation and integration of these cellular processes, however, are still poorly understood.
Membrane proteins are attractive targets for functional genomic studies mostly due to their important functions such as the transport of ions, nutrients, metabolites, and signaling molecules, signal transduction, bioenergetic processes, cell adhesion, and intracellular communications [4]. Due to their low abundance, poor trypsin digestibility, and instability outside of the lipid bilayers, membrane proteins are challenging to study using biochemical methods [5,6]. Thus, membrane proteome characterization has been limited. Over the past ten years, there have been many improvements in membrane proteomic methods. The development of mass spectrometry (MS)-compatible detergents, filter-assisted sample preparation, surface capture protocols, and significant advancements in MS instrumentation have significantly improved the understanding of membrane proteomes [4].
MS-based proteomics has become a standard analytical tool in various biological research fields, from basic research to membrane protein research, revealing the critical physiological roles of proteins [7]. The proteome of soybean subjected to salinity has been analyzed using roots and hypocotyls of young seedlings and other tissues, and indicated that photosynthesis, protein biosynthesis, and ATP biosynthesis-related proteins decreased while defense proteins increased in soybean in response to salt stress [8]. Further comparative proteomic approaches have been employed to explore proteome expression patterns in germinating soybeans under salt treatments, with the results suggesting that enhanced energy metabolism and accelerated protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum were important strategies for the response to NaCl stress in germinating soybean [9]. In addition, proteomic approaches were also applied to seedlings of different salt-tolerant soybean genotypes under salt stress [10], which identified several proteins as potential candidates for augmenting salt tolerance in soybean. Several ion-exchanger genes have been identified to contribute to NaCl stress tolerance in soybean [11,12] and are the integral components of the plasma membrane. Resequencing of a recombinant inbred line population [13] led to the identification of a salt tolerance gene (Glyma03g32900) named GmCHX1 which encodes an ion transporter localized on the membrane [13]. GmCAX1, a plasma membrane-localized cation/H+ antiporter in soybean, was reported to be induced in soybean by treatment with Na+ and other osmoticums such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) [14]. Several soybean calcium-dependent protein kinases, which are membrane-bound with both kinase and calcium sensor domains, were recently reported to be upregulated in response to abscisic acid (ABA) and drought treatments [15].
Most studies that investigated salt responses in soybean have focused on the relatively late responses to salinity treatment. In contrast, the early responses of plants to long-term salt stress have been overlooked [9,16]. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to investigate the membrane proteome and identify differentially expressed membrane proteins under long-term salt stress in soybean seedlings to evaluate their early responses. We used label-free quantitative proteomic techniques to detect these differentially expressed membrane proteins in leaves and roots in response to 50 mM and 100 mM NaCl treatments in the salt-sensitive genotype, C08. Our approach was sensitive enough to identify salt-induced membrane proteins with significantly altered abundance and advanced our understanding of salt-responsive mechanisms in the cell membranes of the soybean plant.

2. Results

2.1. Salt Stress Hinders Soybean Root and Shoot Growth

The growth of cultivated soybean C08 seeds germinated under salt stress at 50 and 100 mM NaCl for seven days was retarded compared to the control, with more pronounced effects exhibited in roots, resulting in a significant reduction in the numbers and lengths of lateral roots, and the effects increased with the concentration of NaCl in the treatment, although 50 mM NaCl did not induce any obvious root phenotypic differences except for reduced lateral root growth. Salt treatment also caused the unifoliate leaf margins to roll inward and hindered their expansion compared to control (Figure 1), with reduced internode, stem length, and chlorosis. The resultant phenotypes support the hypothesis that the exogenous NaCl application perhaps has an inhibitory effect on soybean seed germination and radicle length, as previously observed [17].

2.2. Leaf and Root Membrane Proteome under Salt Stress Revealed by Orbitrap

To probe the responses of soybean plasma membrane towards salinity and to search for clues to the mechanisms of these responses, label-free quantitative proteomics, was used to analyze the leaf and root samples from 7-day-old soybean C08 seedlings germinated under salt stress, with three biological replicates for each treatment and tissue. The identified proteins and their relative abundance are listed in Supplementary Tables S1–S4, with an average of 1000–1200 total proteins identified from leaf and root tissues, respectively (Figure 2). Gene ontology (GO) annotations and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses of the whole-proteome datasets from both tissues were compared based on the molecular functions of the identified proteins between the control and salt-treated samples and categorized by their p-values. Overall, the proteome datasets from both leaf and root tissues were enriched in membrane proteins involved in transporter-related activities such as active ion transmembrane transporters, ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporters, calcium ion binders, GTP binders, channel binders, monovalent transmembrane transporters, proton transmembrane transporters, soluble NSF attachment protein receptors (SNAREs), and proton transporters that are typically present in lower numbers in normal plant proteome datasets (Figure 3). This suggests our methodology is a good approach to identify transporter-related proteins in plants.
In the root, the 50 mM NaCl treatment induced many proteins, such as transmembrane transporters, pyrophosphatases, ion channels, hydrolases, and anion binding proteins, which were absent in the control dataset (Figure 3b). In addition, the 100 mM salt treatment also activated proteins such as NADPH dehydrogenases and flavoprotein oxidoreductases, which were missing in both control and 50 mM NaCl-treated root samples. It has been reported earlier that that ion channels and other transmembrane transporters are first to be activated upon salt stress, and they continue to function to mitigate more severe or prolonged salt exposure [18]. In the root, SNARE-binding activities were drastically reduced upon salt stress, which warrants further investigation into how roots cope with salt stress in soybean and other plants (Figure 3b).
The leaf proteome data revealed that salt stress induced many proteins such as cation transmembrane transporters, anion transporters, passive membrane transporters, voltage-gated ion channel proteins, superoxide dismutase copper chaperone, and translation factor binders (Figure 3a). Significant changes in many proteins related to NADPH dehydrogenases, endopeptidases, translation elongation, and monovalent inorganic cation transporters were observed in the 100 mM salt-treated leaf samples compared to control or 50 mM salt-treated samples.
KEGG pathway analyses of the leaf and root proteomes provided information on the pathways activated under salt stress. In the root, significant enrichment of proteins involved in linoleic acid metabolism pathway, endocytosis pathway, protein export pathway, and fatty acid biosynthesis pathway was observed in salt-treated samples compared to controls (Figure 3d). Overall, fatty acid metabolism, carbon metabolism, biosynthesis of amino acids, and 2-oxocarboxylic acid metabolism-related proteins were significantly enriched in salt-treated root samples (Figure 3d). In the leaves, salt stress induced different pathways, particularly those related to phagosome, spliceosome, and SNARE interactions in vesicular transport (Figure 3c). A significant enrichment in porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism was observed in 100 mM salt-treated leaf samples compared to control and 50 mM salt-treated samples (Figure 3c).
In the identified proteomes, about 50% of the proteins in both leaf and root tissues were categorized as membrane proteins under cellular component in the UniProt Knowledgebase [19]. All the identified membrane proteins had transmembrane domains (Supplementary Tables S1–S4). In total, we identified 972 membrane proteins from the leaf and root tissues combined, in which 421 proteins were commonly shared by both tissues, 320 membrane proteins were root-specific, and 233 were leaf-specific (Figure 4a). The 972 membrane proteins were further categorized on the basis of their subcellular locations, enzyme activities and the domains they contain (Supplementary Tables S1–S4). Based on enzymatic functions, they can be further sorted into 158 transporter proteins, 107 oxidoreductases, 88 primary active transporters, 79 membrane traffic proteins, 41 ATP synthases, 25 SNARE proteins, and 23 chaperone proteins (Figure 4b). According to cellular component classification, there were 374 proteins identified as integral components of the membrane, 47 membrane proteins, 25 chloroplast thylakoid membrane components, 23 mitochondrial inner membrane components, 21 endoplasmic reticulum membrane components, and 20 proteins associated to the SNARE complex, photosystem I and chloroplast envelope (Figure 4c). The predominant domains in our membrane proteomes were P-loop-containing nucleoside triphosphate hydrolases, AAA+ ATPases, small GTPase-binding protein domains, chlorophyll a/b binding protein domains, C2 calcium-dependent membrane domains, ABC transporters, Band7 proteins, porin domain, remorins, aquaporins, syntaxins and stomatins (Figure 4d).

2.3. Differentially Expressed Membrane Proteins (DEMPs) in Soybean Leaves and Roots under Salt Stress

Using label-free quantification, we identified 129 differentially expressed membrane proteins (DEMPs) from both tissues and the volcano plots drawn based on a −log10 p-value > 0.05 and absolute fold-change value > 0.5 (Figure 5 and Table 1). In the leaf, 50 membrane proteins were upregulated and 21 were downregulated, while in the root, 26 were upregulated and 32 downregulated in response to salt stress. GO annotation enrichment analysis of the DEMPs revealed that the membrane proteins upregulated in the leaf were involved in nearly every aspect of transport mechanisms, purine nucleoside biosynthesis and metabolic processes, indicating the important roles of various transporters (e.g., proton transmembrane transporters, cation transporters, energy-coupled transporters, etc.) to combat salt stress in soybean (Supplementary Figure S1a). DEMPs related to membrane and transport were reported to be involved in early events in salt signal transduction [14]. On the other hand, the downregulated membrane proteins in leaf were mostly involved in photosynthetic processes such as light reaction, protein chromophore linkage, response to light stimulus, and generation of precursor metabolites and energy (Supplementary Figure S1b). All the leaf DEMPs are presented in Table 1 and Table 2 along with their gene Ensemble IDs, descriptions, Arabidopsis homologs identifier, number of peptides detected, PSMs (peptide spectrum matches), molecular weights and isoelectric points. Among the leaf DEMPs, there were several highly upregulated membrane proteins such as GLYMA_08G224400 (V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A), GLYMA_11G120200 (probable NAD[P]H dehydrogenase), GLYMA_11G179300 (NAD[P]H-ubiquinone oxidoreductase C1), GLYMA_02G272600 (RESTRICTED TEV MOVEMENT 2), GLYMA_13G276500 (proton pump-interactor 1), and GLYMA_09G040600 (abscisic acid receptor PYL12) (Figure 5). On the other hand, the downregulated membrane proteins in leaf contained many chloroplast membrane proteins such as GLYMA_12G059600 (plastid TRANSCRIPTIONALLY ACTIVE 16), GLYMA_05G246900 (PRA1 family protein B5), GLYMA_16G165200 and GLYMA_02G305400 (chlorophyll a/b binding proteins 1 and 1.2), and GLYMA_02G147200 (RAN GTPase-activating protein 1), suggesting a new role of chloroplast membrane proteins in salt stress signaling, or it could simply be a result of the winding down of photosynthetic activities in exchange for ramping up salt stress responses (Figure 5 and Table 1).
In the root, the 26 upregulated membrane proteins were mostly involved in the establishment of localization, nitrogen compound transport, intracellular transport, and inorganic cation and ion transmembrane transport, whereas most of the 32 downregulated membrane proteins were involved in cellular protein localization, mitochondrial transport and macromolecule localization (Figure 6, Table 3 and Table 4). The most highly upregulated proteins included GLYMA_05G215100 (COP1-interactive protein 1), GLYMA_05G078000 (wall-associated receptor kinase-like 6), GLYMA_14G126300 (cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 7-2), GLYMA_11G146900 (receptor-like protein 4), GLYMA_08G348200 (alpha-mannosidase I MNS4), GLYMA_04G174800 (ATPase 11, plasma membrane-type), GLYMA_08G020300 (V-type proton ATPase subunit E1 [V-ATPase subunit E1]) and GLYMA_10G220100 (Ras-related protein RABG3a) (Figure 6 and Table 3). The major downregulated membrane proteins in the root were: GLYMA_10G211000 (Aquaporin PIP2-2), GLYMA_04G220400 (probable inactive receptor kinase), GLYMA_16G166600 (2-succinyl-6-hydroxy-2,4-cyclohexadiene-1-carboxylate synthase), GLYMA_13G058400 (membrane-anchored ubiquitin-fold protein 2), GLYMA_09G114500 (exocyst complex component SEC3A), GLYMA_17G021200 (probable prolyl 4-hydroxylase 4), GLYMA_04G095900 (tetratricopeptide repeat domain-containing protein PYG7), GLYMA_11G122300 (mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM6 homolog), GLYMA_20G006500 (proton pump-interactor 1), and GLYMA_07G059400 (SUN domain-containing protein 1) (Figure 6 and Table 4).

2.4. Transcriptomic Verifications of DEMPs in Root and Leaf Tissues under Salt Stress

To validate the DEMPs at the transcript level, we cross-checked transcript expression patterns in a previously published dataset [20] at 24 and 48 h of salt treatment in soybean leaf and root tissues. We found that most of the DEMPs had differential gene expression patterns consistent with the differential protein expression levels in this study (Figure 7). In the leaves, 37 DEMPs had matching gene expression patterns in response to salt stress. The key upregulated proteins with doubled transcript expression levels were: GLYMA_13G088700 (annexin D1-related), GLYMA_13G295500 (solute carrier family 25 [mitochondrial adenine nucleotide translocator]), GLYMA_14G039100 (elongation factor 1-beta), GLYMA_16G026500 (uncharacterized protein), GLYMA_18G062900 (peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase), GLYMA_05G064300 (Ras-related protein Rab-1A), GLYMA_03G214500 (NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone) Fe-S protein 5), GLYMA_05G064300 (Ras-related protein Rab-1A [RAB1A]), GLYMA_08G224400 (V-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit A (ATPeV1A, ATP6A), GLYMA_13G276500 (proton pump-interactor 1), and GLYMA_10G012800 (cytochrome C oxidase subunit 5C) (Figure 7). The key downregulated DEMPs due to salt stress with matching differential gene expression levels were: GLYMA_02G305400 (light-harvesting complex II chlorophyll a/b binding protein 2), GLYMA_03G056700 (Delta [12]-fatty acid dehydrogenase), GLYMA_07G049000 (CURVATURE THYLAKOID 1B), GLYMA_08G074000 (light-harvesting complex II chlorophyll a/b binding protein 6), GLYMA_16G165200 (light-harvesting complex II chlorophyll a/b binding protein 1), GLYMA_19G007700 (carbonic anhydrase 2, chloroplastic-), and GLYMA_07G057200 (chitinase domain-containing protein 1) (Figure 8).
In the root, we found 14 upregulated transcripts in which three proteins were encoded: GLYMA_10G024000 (phospholipid: diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1), GLYMA_11G146900 (receptor-like protein 4), and GLYMA_14G126300 (cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit) having maximum gene expression at 24 h of salt treatment (Figure 8a). The other DEMPs with highly upregulated transcript levels were: GLYMA_10G107700 (calcium-transporting ATPase 4), GLYMA_06G161400 (bidirectional sugar transporter SWEET15), GLYMA_04G174800 (ATPase 11, plasma membrane-type), GLYMA_04G240400 (vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 45 homolog), GLYMA_08G100800 (LRR receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase), GLYMA_08G348200 (alpha-mannosidase), and GLYMA_10G132300 (ammonium transporter 1 member 1) (Figure 8a). There were 21 DEMPs with downregulated gene expression levels at both 24 and 48 h salt treatment, including GLYMA_04G181000 (cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel 16), GLYMA_02G307700 (fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein 7), GLYMA_08G348000 (glucuronosyltransferase 8), GLYMA_07G059400 (SUN domain-containing protein), GLYMA_01G007700 (mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM17-2), and GLYMA_09G243700 (subtilisin-like protease SBT5.4) (Figure 8b). There were also some DEMPs with lowered transcript levels at 24 h salt treatment but increased expression levels at 48 h treatment, including GLYMA_05G199200 (calnexin homolog 1), GLYMA_04G220400 (probable inactive receptor kinase), GLYMA_02G086600 (binding partner of ACD11), GLYMA_10G208300 (ras-related protein RABF1), GLYMA_14G201500 (protein TIC110, chloroplastic) and GLYMA_05G016100 (CHAPERONE-LIKE PROTEIN OF POR1, chloroplastic) (Figure 8b).

2.5. Salt-Stress-Induced Membrane Proteins from Soybean Leaf and Root Tissues

In both root and leaf proteomes, we found 140 membrane proteins in root and 57 in leaf that were expressed only with salt treatment and absent from the control datasets based on their detection in the form of peptides. These were mainly involved in transport processes inside the cell (Supplementary Figure S2). Salt-stress-induced membrane proteins in leaf were enriched in biological processes GO terms such as pyrophosphate hydrolysis-driven proton transmembrane transporter activity, protein macromolecule adaptor activity, primary active transmembrane transporter activity, inorganic molecular entity transmembrane transporter activity, ATPase-coupled cation transporter activity, porin activity, and malate antiporter activity, indicating that these membrane proteins were induced by salt stress to minimize the stress impact (Supplementary Figure S2a). In the root, the salt-stress-induced membrane proteins, enriched in GO terms such as cation transport, anion transport, active transmembrane transport, proton transport, electron transport, ATPase-coupled transport alongside calcium binders, clathrin heavy chain binders, oxidoreductases, and phospholipase activators, served to mitigate salt stress (Supplementary Figure S2b). Among the 57 potential salt-inducible membrane proteins in the leaf were GLYMA_05G019400, (ABC transporter B family member 27), GLYMA_12G172500 (aquaporin PIP2-2), GLYMA_09G056300 (ATPase 2, plasma membrane-type), GLYMA_04G203800 (bidirectional sugar transporter SWEET15), GLYMA_05G032500 (GDP-mannose transporter), GLYMA_14G099800 (mitochondrial carrier protein), GLYMA_18G297700 (piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel), GLYMA_13G307600 (syntaxin-131), GLYMA_07G028500 (pyrophosphate-energized vacuolar membrane proton pump 1), GLYMA_20G014300 (auxin efflux carrier component 3), GLYMA_09G009300 (mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 4), and GLYMA_04G246100 (sucrose transport protein SUC9), as well as fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins, GLYMA_17G030700 (COBRA-like protein 7), GLYMA_09G114000 (outer envelope pore protein 24B, chloroplastic), GLYMA_08G288900 (SUPPRESSOR OF QUENCHING 1, chloroplastic), and GLYMA_14G035500 (vesicle-associated membrane protein 713), suggesting that salt stress impacts multiple processes inside the cell (Table 5).
In the root, there were multiple transporter proteins that were induced by salt treatment, including GLYMA_13G220000 (ABC transporter C family member 2), GLYMA_10G167800 (ammonium transporter 1 member 2), GLYMA_17G124900 (high-affinity nitrate transporter 3.1), GLYMA_10G057000 (membrane magnesium transporter), GLYMA_16G046200 (potassium transporter 4), GLYMA_08G092000 (sodium/hydrogen exchanger 7), and GLYMA_08G180400 (sulfate transporter 1.3), showing the important role of transporter proteins in response to salt stress. There were also membrane receptor kinases induced by salt stress, such as GLYMA_08G180800 (BRI1-associated receptor kinase 1), GLYMA_09G110500 (L-type lectin-domain containing receptor kinase S.5), and GLYMA_12G212200 (Serine/threonine-protein kinase VPS15) (Table 6). Phospholipase-related membrane proteins were particularly abundant in root tissues upon salt stress treatment, including GLYMA_11G085100 (phosphoinositide phosphatase SAC7), GLYMA_10G183200 (phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase 2), GLYMA_07G031100 (phospholipase D alpha 1), and GLYMA_14G059200 (phosphoinositide phospholipase C2) (Table 6). There were also vesicle-associated, vacuolar, chloroplastic and mitochondrial membrane proteins induced by salt tress, including GLYMA_06G067800 (vesicle putative clathrin assembly protein), GLYMA_12G032400 (synaptotagmin-2 vesicle), GLYMA_07G119500 (vacuolar protein-sorting-associated protein 11 homolog), GLYMA_06G023000 (vacuolar Protein FREE1), GLYMA_18G217200 (RETICULATA-RELATED 3, chloroplastic), GLYMA_06G039500 (TIC 22, chloroplastic), GLYMA_12G094000 (alternative NAD[P]H-ubiquinone oxidoreductase C1, chloroplastic/mitochondrial), GLYMA_06G019400 (ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH 5, chloroplastic), GLYMA_03G114600 (oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 3-2, chloroplastic), GLYMA_05G110100 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6a, mitochondrial), GLYMA_10G286200 (dihydroorotate dehydrogenase [quinone], mitochondrial), GLYMA_10G049900 (mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit), and GLYMA_07G193700 (mitochondrial inner membrane protein OXA1). Membrane-trafficking proteins such as GLYMA_12G001900 (patellin-3), GLYMA_14G199000 (sorting nexin 2B), and vacuolar proton pump proteins GLYMA_15G044700 (v-type proton ATPase subunit a1), GLYMA_20G106500 (v-type proton ATPase subunit B2) and GLYMA_02G065500 (v-type proton ATPase subunit C), and trafficking signal-inducing ethylene response protein GLYMA_16G071500 (EIN2-CEND) were also induced by salt stress in soybean root tissues (Table 6).

3. Discussion

To cope with salt stress, soybean plants have evolved complex salt-responsive signaling at the membrane, cellular, organ, and whole-plant levels. Membrane proteins play a variety of roles in crucial biological functions, for example, the transport of biological substances (ions, nutrients, metabolites and signaling molecules), signal transduction, bioenergetic processes, immune response, cell adhesion, and cell–cell interactions. These proteins are challenging to study using biochemical methods because they are only present at low levels and are unstable outside of the lipid bilayers [5]. Hence, they are seldom studied despite their significance in biological systems. Nonetheless, the growing demand for increased quality and quantity of membrane proteomic data has resulted in improved membrane proteomics methodology. High-throughput MS has contributed significantly to the comprehensiveness of proteomics, resulting in the identification of many membrane proteins [4]. Here, we carried out unbiased label-free quantitative proteomic analyses comparing the relative abundance of membrane proteins in salt-treated samples of soybean leaves and roots compared to controls. Among the 972 membrane proteins identified, a total of 233 proteins in leaves and 320 proteins in roots responded to NaCl-stress treatments.
The possible observed pictorial phenotypes of decreased plant height, reduced internode and lateral root number and length were similar to those reported in previous soybean studies where exogenous NaCl applications had a remarkable inhibitory effect on plant growth [21,22] (Figure 1).
Our detected membrane proteome included proteins such as active ion transmembrane transporters [23], ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporters [24], calcium ion binders [25], GTP binders [26], channel proteins [12], monovalent transmembrane transporters [18], transmembrane proton transporters [27], and SNARE receptors [28], confirming their involvement in salt stress tolerance observed in previous studies. In the root, upon 100 mM salt treatment, the activation of NADPH dehydrogenases and flavoprotein oxidoreductases clearly indicated that NADPH regeneration would be essential in the defense mechanism against salt-induced oxidative stress [29].
In leaves, the enrichment of KEGG pathways involved in phagosome, spliceosome and SNARE interactions in vesicular transport strongly suggested that certain splicing factors and autophagy could increase the plant tolerance to salt stress [30,31] (Figure 3c). In the root, the enrichment of KEGG pathways involved in linoleic acid metabolism and endocytosis suggested that salt-stress responses such as lipid metabolism and increased plasma membrane endocytosis could be possible mechanisms for mitigating salt stress in plants [32,33] (Figure 3d). Conserved membrane proteins, including Band7 proteins, porins, remorins, aquaporins, syntaxins and stomatins, could be the major responsive proteins against salt stress in plants because they are crucial in transport, signaling, bioenergetics, and catalysis [34,35,36].
In the leaf, the upregulated proteins, such as abscisic acid receptor PYL12 (GLYMA_09G040600), COP1-interactive protein 1 (GLYMA_11G096400), two cation/H(+) antiporter 8 (GLYMA_09G222500; GLYMA_12G036000), Synaptotagmin-1 (GLYMA_11G107300), V-ATPase subunit A, V-ATPase subunit E3, E1 (GLYMA_08G224400, GLYMA_05G214200, GLYMA_08G020300), and aquaporin NIP2-1 (GLYMA_12G066300), suggest their novel roles in salt-stress responses towards sodium toxicity and ABA-mediated activities inside leaf cells (Table 1 and Figure 4). A soybean sodium/hydrogen exchanger enhanced the salt tolerance through maintaining a higher Na+ efflux rate and K+/Na+ ratio in Arabidopsis [37]. In rice, a Na+/H+ exchanger protein is the sole Na+ efflux transporter and its loss-of-function mutant displayed exceptional salt sensitivity [38]. In Arabidopsis, synaptotagmin-1 mutant plants were severely affected by salt stress since this protein is required for the maintenance of plasma membrane integrity [39,40]. During salinity stress, V-ATPases facilitate the sequestration of Na+ in the vacuole by establishing an electrochemical proton gradient across the tonoplast [41], and their abundances and activities are usually increased during salinity stress. An adaptive response and induced expression of Nodulin 26-like Intrinsic Protein 2-1 (NIP2-1) were recorded in Arabidopsis under low-oxygen stress [42].
Many proteins related to chloroplasts and photosynthesis were downregulated upon salt stress treatment in soybean leaves, including chlorophyll a/b binding protein 2.1 (GLYMA_02G305400), ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH 5 (GLYMA_04G019100), CURVATURE THYLAKOID 1B (GLYMA_07G049000), Photosystem I chlorophyll a/b-binding protein 5 (GLYMA_08G074000), Photosystem I reaction center subunit N (GLYMA_10G256000), PLASTID TRANSCRIPTIONALLY ACTIVE 16 (GLYMA_11G135900), Photosystem II protein D1(GLYMA_13G028200), and Beta-carbonic anhydrase 1, chloroplast (GLYMA_19G007700), indicating that salinity-stress-enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production led to severe damage to chloroplasts (Table 2 and Figure 4). The lowered expressions of chloroplast- and photosynthesis-related genes under salt stress have also been reported previously in soybean leaves [20,43].
In the root, differentially expressed ion pump proteins, which included vacuolar-type proton ATPase subunit E1 (GLYMA_08G020300), ATPase 11, plasma membrane-type (GLYMA_04G174800), and calcium-transporting ATPase 4, plasma membrane-type (GLYMA_10G107700), were found to be critical for plant salt tolerance and had key roles in regulating ion transport under salt stress (Table 3 and Figure 5). An improved method using tandem affinity purification tag for the salt-overly sensitive (SOS) pathway indicated that subunits A, B, C, E and G of the peripheral cytoplasmic domain of the vacuolar ATPase were present in an SOS2-containing protein complex to maintain favorable ion ratios in the cytoplasm and for increasing the tolerance of salt stress [9,44]. An overexpressing form of the plasma membrane ATPase that is constitutively active conferred increased salt tolerance [45,46]. It has been reported that the salt-stress-induced elevation in cytosolic Ca2+ and the new cytosolic Ca2+ status is regulated by Ca2+-ATPases [47]. In the root, the transporter proteins that were highly upregulated by salt stress included ammonium transporter 1 (GLYMA_10G132300) and high affinity nitrate transporter 2.5 (GLYMA_18G141900), suggesting that ammonium transport could alleviate ammonia toxicity caused by salt stress. The overexpression of PutAMT1;1 gene promoted early root growth after seed germination in transgenic Arabidopsis under salt stress [48]. In salt-stressed roots, the upregulation of serine/threonine-protein kinase PBL19 (GLYMA_01G181700), wall-associated receptor kinase-like 6 (GLYMA_05G078000), LRR receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase (GLYMA_08G100800), receptor-like protein 4 (GLYMA_11G146900), and calcium-dependent protein kinase 2 (GLYMA_15G222300) indicated that they are potential salt-stress sensors in the root (Table 3). SlWAK1 is a wall-associated kinase involved in salt tolerance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). slwak1 mutants are tolerant to Na+ stress, but not to osmotic stress [49]. For example, in Medicago truncatula, the LRR-RLK gene, Srlk, was rapidly induced in roots in response to salt stress [6]. In potato, calcium-dependent protein kinase 2 was identified as a sensor-transducer in the salt stress response in potato plants. Its overexpression promoted ROS scavenging, chlorophyll stability and the induction of stress-responsive genes, thus conferring tolerance to salinity [50].
In the root, the downregulated membrane proteins upon salt stress included aquaporin PIP2-2 (GLYMA_10G211000), proton pump-interactor 1 (GLYMA_20G006500), calnexin homolog (GLYMA_05G199200), (GLYMA_09G243700), and ras-related protein RABF1 (GLYMA_10G208300) (Table 4 and Figure 5). In Arabidopsis, salt stress is known to localize PIP2 to intracellular compartments, probably to decrease the water permeability of the root [51]. In Arabidopsis, subtilase 6.1 associated with the unfolded protein responded to salt stress through the cleavage of an ER-resident type II membrane protein (bZIP28) [52]. In tobacco, the calreticulin gene from wheat (TaCRT1) improved the salinity tolerance [53]. In Arabidopsis, RabF1 is involved in salt-stress responses through endosomal vesicle transport and may play a crucial role in the recycling and degradation of molecules [54]. We found some chloroplast-related proteins downregulated under salt stress in roots, such as GLYMA_04G095900 (tetratricopeptide repeat domain-containing protein PYG7), GLYMA_05G016100 (CHAPERONE-LIKE PROTEIN OF POR1), GLYMA_14G076000 (outer envelope pore protein 24B), and GLYMA_14G201500 (TIC110), which are essential for chloroplast development, and their suppression plays a role in salt stress responsiveness in chloroplasts. TIC110 is a component of the protein import apparatus in the chloroplast, and its downregulation suggests that salt stress hinders the process of importing nuclear DNA-encoded proteins into chloroplasts. In Arabidopsis, the downregulation of TIC110 expression resulted in the reduced accumulation of a wide variety of plastid proteins [55]. The downregulation of mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM17-2 and mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM6 indicates that salt stress hinders the import processes in mitochondria in response to stress [56]. The downregulation of mitochondrial ADP, ATP carrier protein 3 (GLYMA_12G205400), means that salt stress disrupts the supply of ATP from the mitochondrial matrix to the cytosol [57].
We also found some proteins in both soybean leaf and root that were present only in the salt-treated samples, suggesting that they were only produced in response to salt. In the root, salt stress induced many transporter proteins, such as ABC transporter C and G family members, membrane magnesium transporter, potassium transporter 4, sodium/hydrogen exchanger 7 (SOS1), and sulfate transporter 1.3 (Table 5 and Table 6). Under salinity stress, the ABC transporters have been reported to enhance plant tolerance through the sequestration of sodium salt [58]. In rice, a Mg transporter, OsMGT1, is required for salt tolerance probably by regulating the transport activity of OsHKT1;5, a key transporter for the removal of Na+ from the xylem sap at the root maturation zone [59]. In soybean, salt treatment elevated the expressions of SOS1 and AKT1 genes, and reduced the expressions of SKOR and HKT1 genes [37]. A significant accumulation of Na+ in the roots of the gmsos1 mutants resulted in the imbalance between Na+ and K+, which impaired Na+ efflux and increased K+ efflux in the roots of soybean under salt stress [60]. Interestingly, the expression of the sulfur transporter AtSULTR3;1 was upregulated in response to drought and salt stress [61].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Soybean Stress Treatment

The surface-sterilized seeds of G. max (accession C08) were germinated in moist vermiculite supplemented with 50 mM or 100 mM NaCl treatments in the greenhouse under normal conditions. After 7 days, whole plant roots and the unifoliate leaves were collected for membrane proteome extraction and quantification. Three independent sets of control and NaCl-treated samples were collected, and each biological replicate represented a pooled sample of three individual plants.

4.2. Extraction of Membrane Proteins and Trypsin Digestion

Liquid-nitrogen-frozen leaf and root tissues (about 100 mg) were ground to a fine powder with a pestle and mortar, and membrane proteins were then extracted using a membrane extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol using plasma membrane extraction protocols (Cat#SM-005-P; Invent Biotechnologies, Plymouth, MN, USA). The extracted proteins were dissolved in 8 M urea buffer for further digestion and sample preparation.
Digestion of proteins was performed using SMART digestTM trypsin kit (60109-101; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in solution. Protein reduction and alkylation were achieved with 10 mM dithiothreitol at 56 °C for 30 min followed by 25 mM iodoacetamide at room temperature for 25 min. The digested peptides were purified using PierceTM C-18 spin columns (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and finally dissolved in 0.1% formic acid (FA).

4.3. Orbitrap-Based Liquid Chromatography-Tandem MS (LC-MS/MS) Analysis

MS analysis was performed using an Orbitrap FusionTM LumosTM TribridTM Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) interfaced with an LC UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano system (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The peptide separation was carried out at 50 °C with a C-18 μ-precolumn (300 μm i.d. × 5 mm) followed by AcclaimTM PepMapTM RSLC, on a nanoViper C-18 column, 75 μm × 25 cm (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a flow rate of 0.3 μLmin−1, using mobile phase A (98% H2O, 1.9% acetonitrile (ACN) with 0.1% FA) and mobile phase B (98% ACN, 1.9% H2O with 0.1% FA). The following LC gradient was used to detect membrane proteins: 100% mobile phase A for the initial 5 min, followed by 0–6% mobile phase B for 3 min, 6–30% mobile phase B for 42 min, 30–45% mobile phase B for 10 min, 45–60% mobile phase B for 10 min, 60–80% mobile phase B for 5 min and an additional 5 min at 80% mobile phase B, followed by a final re-equilibrium with 100% mobile phase A for 10 min.
The Orbitrap was set up in a data-dependent MS/MS mode under direct control of the Xcalibur software (version 4.1), where a full-scan spectrum (from 375 to 1500 m/z) was followed by tandem mass spectra (MS/MS). The instrument was operated in positive mode with a spray voltage of 2 kV, a capillary temperature of 300 °C, and was calibrated before measurements. Full scans were performed in the Orbitrap with a resolution of 60,000 at 400 m/z, with a precursor ion selection (AGC > 4.0e5) and ion charge >1. Higher energy collisional dissociation, performed at the far side of the C-trap, was chosen as the fragmentation method, by applying a 30% value for normalized collision energy, an isolation window of m/z 1.6, with a maximum injection time of 250 milli seconds (ms) and Orbitrap resolution of 15,000.

4.4. Data Analysis and Interpretation

Proteome Discoverer (version 2.3; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), interfaced with an in-house SEQUEST server, was used for data processing, peptide identification, and protein inference, according to the following criteria: Ensembl database of G. max, Enzyme Trypsin, Maximum Missed Cleavage Sites: 2, Precursor Mass Tolerance: 10 ppm, Fragment Mass Tolerance: 0.2 Da, Cysteine Carbamidomethylation as static modification, N-terminal protein acetylation and methionine oxidation as dynamic modifications. The Percolator algorithm was used for peptide validation (peptide confidence: q-value < 0.01, corresponding to false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01) and only Rank 1 peptides were considered. Peptide and protein grouping were performed using the strict maximum parsimony principle. Label-free quantification analyses using the Minora algorithm were performed with three biological replicates for each treatment throughout the whole proteome analyses. To be considered significantly differentially expressed, a protein had to be quantified with at least three peptides in each biological replicate, a p-value <0.05, and a fold-change > 0.5 for upregulated protein or <−0.5 for down-regulated proteins. The functional annotation of proteins was determined by The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) and ShinyGo, and then grouped on the basis of their molecular functions, cellular components, and biological processes from Gene Ontology (GO) terms combined with information from the literature [3,26]. Domain analyses were performed using the InterPro website. Volcano plots of differentially expressed proteins were drawn using VolcaNoseR (https://huygens.science.uva.nl/VolcaNoseR/, accessed on 22 February 2022) and by plotting log10 p-values on the Y-Axis against the log2 fold-changes on the X-axis. The corresponding RNAseq-based gene expression values of significantly differentially expressed proteins were retrieved from [20] at 24 h and 48 h of salt treatment, and heatmaps were drawn using the heatmapper website.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232113270/s1.

Author Contributions

H.M.R. and H.-M.L. conceived of the idea for the experiments and wrote the manuscript. H.M.R. performed membrane protein extractions and sample preparation and orbitrap analyses and S.C. and S.Z. provided assistance. M.U., P.A.W. and S.A. supported in data analyses. M.K., S.A. and H.-M.L. corrected and proofread the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council Area of Excellence Scheme (AoE/M-403/16) and the Lo Kwee-Seong biomedical Research Fund to H.-M.L.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jee Yan Chu for copy-editing the manuscript and Man-Wah Li for proofreading the manuscript. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not reflect the views of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or the Innovation and Technology Commission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Munns, R. Comparative Physiology of Salt and Water Stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Chinnusamy, V.; Jagendorf, A.; Zhu, J.-K. Understanding and Improving Salt Tolerance in Plants. Crop Sci. 2005, 45, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zhao, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wang, T.; Chen, S.; Dai, S. Proteomics-Based Investigation of Salt-Responsive Mechanisms in Plant Roots. J. Proteom. 2013, 82, 230–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kongpracha, P.; Wiriyasermkul, P.; Isozumi, N.; Moriyama, S.; Kanai, Y.; Nagamori, S. Simple but Efficacious Enrichment of Integral Membrane Proteins and Their Interactions for In-Depth Membrane Proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2022, 21, 100206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. César-Razquin, A.; Snijder, B.; Frappier-Brinton, T.; Isserlin, R.; Gyimesi, G.; Bai, X.; Reithmeier, R.A.; Hepworth, D.; Hediger, M.A.; Edwards, A.M.; et al. A Call for Systematic Research on Solute Carriers. Cell 2015, 162, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. de Lorenzo, L.; Merchan, F.; Laporte, P.; Thompson, R.; Clarke, J.; Sousa, C.; Crespi, M. A Novel Plant Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor Kinase Regulates the Response of Medicago Truncatula Roots to Salt Stress. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 668–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Várady, G.; Cserepes, J.; Németh, A.; Szabó, E.; Sarkadi, B. Cell Surface Membrane Proteins as Personalized Biomarkers: Where We Stand and Where We Are Headed. Biomark. Med. 2013, 7, 803–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sobhanian, H.; Razavizadeh, R.; Nanjo, Y.; Ehsanpour, A.A.; Jazii, F.R.; Motamed, N.; Komatsu, S. Proteome Analysis of Soybean Leaves, Hypocotyls and Roots under Salt Stress. Proteome Sci. 2010, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pi, E.; Qu, L.; Hu, J.; Huang, Y.; Qiu, L.; Lu, H.; Jiang, B.; Liu, C.; Peng, T.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Mechanisms of Soybean Roots’ Tolerances to Salinity Revealed by Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Comparisons Between Two Cultivars. Mol. Cell. Proteom. MCP 2016, 15, 266–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ma, H.; Song, L.; Shu, Y.; Wang, S.; Niu, J.; Wang, Z.; Yu, T.; Gu, W.; Ma, H. Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Seedling Leaves of Different Salt Tolerant Soybean Genotypes. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 1529–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, H.; Chen, X.; Gu, H.; Wu, B.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, X.; Cui, X. GmHKT1;4, a Novel Soybean Gene Regulating Na+/K+ Ratio in Roots Enhances Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 73, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wei, P.; Che, B.; Shen, L.; Cui, Y.; Wu, S.; Cheng, C.; Liu, F.; Li, M.-W.; Yu, B.; Lam, H.-M. Identification and Functional Characterization of the Chloride Channel Gene, GsCLC-C2 from Wild Soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Qi, X.; Li, M.-W.; Xie, M.; Liu, X.; Ni, M.; Shao, G.; Song, C.; Kay-Yuen Yim, A.; Tao, Y.; Wong, F.-L.; et al. Identification of a Novel Salt Tolerance Gene in Wild Soybean by Whole-Genome Sequencing. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Luo, G.-Z.; Wang, H.-W.; Huang, J.; Tian, A.-G.; Wang, Y.-J.; Zhang, J.-S.; Chen, S.-Y. A Putative Plasma Membrane Cation/Proton Antiporter from Soybean Confers Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 59, 809–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hettenhausen, C.; Sun, G.; He, Y.; Zhuang, H.; Sun, T.; Qi, J.; Wu, J. Genome-Wide Identification of Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinases in Soybean and Analyses of Their Transcriptional Responses to Insect Herbivory and Drought Stress. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 18973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Liu, C.-W.; Chang, T.-S.; Hsu, Y.-K.; Wang, A.Z.; Yen, H.-C.; Wu, Y.-P.; Wang, C.-S.; Lai, C.-C. Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Early Salt Stress Responsive Proteins in Roots and Leaves of Rice. Proteomics 2014, 14, 1759–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shu, K.; Qi, Y.; Chen, F.; Meng, Y.; Luo, X.; Shuai, H.; Zhou, W.; Ding, J.; Du, J.; Liu, J.; et al. Salt Stress Represses Soybean Seed Germination by Negatively Regulating GA Biosynthesis While Positively Mediating ABA Biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wu, H. Plant Salt Tolerance and Na+ Sensing and Transport. Crop J. 2018, 6, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. UniProt Consortium UniProt: The Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D480–D489. [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, A.; Xiao, Z.; Li, M.-W.; Wong, F.-L.; Yung, W.-S.; Ku, Y.-S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Xie, M.; Yim, A.K.-Y.; et al. Transcriptomic Reprogramming in Soybean Seedlings under Salt Stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 98–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arif, M.R.; Islam, M.T.; Robin, A.H.K. Salinity Stress Alters Root Morphology and Root Hair Traits in Brassica napus. Plants 2019, 8, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Otie, V.; Udo, I.; Shao, Y.; Itam, M.O.; Okamoto, H.; An, P.; Eneji, E.A. Salinity Effects on Morpho-Physiological and Yield Traits of Soybean (Glycine max L.) as Mediated by Foliar Spray with Brassinolide. Plants 2021, 10, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Huang, L.; Wu, D.-Z.; Zhang, G.-P. Advances in Studies on Ion Transporters Involved in Salt Tolerance and Breeding Crop Cultivars with High Salt Tolerance. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2020, 21, 426–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mansour, M.M.F. Role of Vacuolar Membrane Transport Systems in Plant Salinity Tolerance. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Seifikalhor, M.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Shomali, A.; Azad, N.; Hassani, B.; Lastochkina, O.; Li, T. Calcium Signaling and Salt Tolerance Are Diversely Entwined in Plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2019, 14, 1665455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ali, Z.; Zhang, D.Y.; Xu, Z.L.; Xu, L.; Yi, J.X.; He, X.L.; Huang, Y.H.; Liu, X.Q.; Khan, A.A.; Trethowan, R.M.; et al. Uncovering the Salt Response of Soybean by Unraveling Its Wild and Cultivated Functional Genomes Using Tag Sequencing. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Ibrahimova, U.; Zivcak, M.; Gasparovic, K.; Rastogi, A.; Allakhverdiev, S.I.; Yang, X.; Brestic, M. Electron and Proton Transport in Wheat Exposed to Salt Stress: Is the Increase of the Thylakoid Membrane Proton Conductivity Responsible for Decreasing the Photosynthetic Activity in Sensitive Genotypes? Photosynth. Res. 2021, 150, 195–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kwon, C.; Lee, J.-H.; Yun, H.S. SNAREs in Plant Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses. Mol. Cells 2020, 43, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Leterrier, M.; Barroso, J.B.; Valderrama, R.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. NADP-Dependent Isocitrate Dehydrogenase from Arabidopsis Roots Contributes in the Mechanism of Defence against the Nitro-Oxidative Stress Induced by Salinity. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 694740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cui, P.; Xiong, L. Environmental Stress and Pre-MRNA Splicing. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1302–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Luo, L.; Zhang, P.; Zhu, R.; Fu, J.; Su, J.; Zheng, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, D.; Gong, Q. Autophagy Is Rapidly Induced by Salt Stress and Is Required for Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Gogna, M.; Choudhary, A.; Mishra, G.; Kapoor, R.; Bhatla, S.C. Changes in Lipid Composition in Response to Salt Stress and Its Possible Interaction with Intracellular Na+-K+ Ratio in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 178, 104147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baral, A.; Irani, N.G.; Fujimoto, M.; Nakano, A.; Mayor, S.; Mathew, M.K. Salt-Induced Remodeling of Spatially Restricted Clathrin-Independent Endocytic Pathways in Arabidopsis Root. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 1297–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Yue, J.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; Yu, J. A Remorin Gene SiREM6, the Target Gene of SiARDP, from Foxtail Millet (Setaria Italica) Promotes High Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Jia, J.; Liang, Y.; Gou, T.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Huo, H.; Guo, J.; Gong, H. The Expression Response of Plasma Membrane Aquaporins to Salt Stress in Tomato Plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 178, 104190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, L.-M.; Fang, Y.-S.; Zhang, C.-J.; Hao, Q.-N.; Cao, D.; Yuan, S.-L.; Chen, H.-F.; Yang, Z.-L.; Chen, S.-L.; Shan, Z.-H.; et al. GmSYP24, a Putative Syntaxin Gene, Confers Osmotic/Drought, Salt Stress Tolerances and ABA Signal Pathway. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Sun, T.-J.; Fan, L.; Yang, J.; Cao, R.-Z.; Yang, C.-Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, D.-M. A Glycine Max Sodium/Hydrogen Exchanger Enhances Salt Tolerance through Maintaining Higher Na+ Efflux Rate and K+/Na+ Ratio in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. El Mahi, H.; Pérez-Hormaeche, J.; De Luca, A.; Villalta, I.; Espartero, J.; Gámez-Arjona, F.; Fernández, J.L.; Bundó, M.; Mendoza, I.; Mieulet, D.; et al. A Critical Role of Sodium Flux via the Plasma Membrane Na(+)/H(+) Exchanger SOS1 in the Salt Tolerance of Rice. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 1046–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Schapire, A.L.; Voigt, B.; Jasik, J.; Rosado, A.; Lopez-Cobollo, R.; Menzel, D.; Salinas, J.; Mancuso, S.; Valpuesta, V.; Baluska, F.; et al. Arabidopsis Synaptotagmin 1 Is Required for the Maintenance of Plasma Membrane Integrity and Cell Viability. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 3374–3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Krausko, M.; Kusá, Z.; Peterková, D.; Labajová, M.; Kumar, A.; Pavlovič, A.; Bačovčinová, M.; Bačkor, M.; Jásik, J. The Absence of the AtSYT1 Function Elevates the Adverse Effect of Salt Stress on Photosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hasegawa, P.M. Sodium (Na+) Homeostasis and Salt Tolerance of Plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 92, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Beamer, Z.G.; Routray, P.; Choi, W.-G.; Spangler, M.K.; Lokdarshi, A.; Roberts, D.M. Aquaporin Family Lactic Acid Channel NIP2;1 Promotes Plant Survival under Low Oxygen Stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2021, 187, 2262–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Suo, J.; Zhao, Q.; David, L.; Chen, S.; Dai, S. Salinity Response in Chloroplasts: Insights from Gene Characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Batelli, G.; Verslues, P.E.; Agius, F.; Qiu, Q.; Fujii, H.; Pan, S.; Schumaker, K.S.; Grillo, S.; Zhu, J.-K. SOS2 Promotes Salt Tolerance in Part by Interacting with the Vacuolar H+-ATPase and Upregulating Its Transport Activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 7781–7790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Gévaudant, F.; Duby, G.; von Stedingk, E.; Zhao, R.; Morsomme, P.; Boutry, M. Expression of a Constitutively Activated Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase Alters Plant Development and Increases Salt Tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1763–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Wang, Y.; Wu, W.-H. Potassium Transport and Signaling in Higher Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 451–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Huda, K.M.K.; Banu, M.S.A.; Tuteja, R.; Tuteja, N. Global Calcium Transducer P-Type Ca2+-ATPases Open New Avenues for Agriculture by Regulating Stress Signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3099–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bu, Y.; Takano, T.; Liu, S. The Role of Ammonium Transporter (AMT) against Salt Stress in Plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2019, 14, 1625696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Meco, V.; Egea, I.; Ortíz-Atienza, A.; Drevensek, S.; Esch, E.; Yuste-Lisbona, F.J.; Barneche, F.; Vriezen, W.; Bolarin, M.C.; Lozano, R.; et al. The Salt Sensitivity Induced by Disruption of Cell Wall-Associated Kinase 1 (SlWAK1) Tomato Gene Is Linked to Altered Osmotic and Metabolic Homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Grossi, C.E.M.; Santin, F.; Quintana, S.A.; Fantino, E.; Ulloa, R.M. Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase 2 Plays a Positive Role in the Salt Stress Response in Potato. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 535–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ueda, M.; Tsutsumi, N.; Fujimoto, M. Salt Stress Induces Internalization of Plasma Membrane Aquaporin into the Vacuole in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 474, 742–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Liu, J.-X.; Srivastava, R.; Che, P.; Howell, S.H. Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis Utilize a Signal Transduction Pathway Related to Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Signaling. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2007, 51, 897–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Xiang, Y.; Lu, Y.H.; Song, M.; Wang, Y.; Xu, W.; Wu, L.; Wang, H.; Ma, Z. Overexpression of a Triticum Aestivum Calreticulin Gene (TaCRT1) Improves Salinity Tolerance in Tobacco. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yin, C.; Karim, S.; Zhang, H.; Aronsson, H. Arabidopsis RabF1 (ARA6) Is Involved in Salt Stress and Dark-Induced Senescence (DIS). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Inaba, T.; Alvarez-Huerta, M.; Li, M.; Bauer, J.; Ewers, C.; Kessler, F.; Schnell, D.J. Arabidopsis Tic110 Is Essential for the Assembly and Function of the Protein Import Machinery of Plastids. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1482–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Wojtyla, Ł.; Kosmala, A.; Garnczarska, M. Lupine Embryo Axes under Salinity Stress. II. Mitochondrial Proteome Response. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 2383–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Luo, Q.; Peng, M.; Zhang, X.; Lei, P.; Ji, X.; Chow, W.; Meng, F.; Sun, G. Comparative Mitochondrial Proteomic, Physiological, Biochemical and Ultrastructural Profiling Reveal Factors Underpinning Salt Tolerance in Tetraploid Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.). BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, W.; Zhao, F.; Fang, W.; Xie, D.; Hou, J.; Yang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Tang, Z.; Nie, L.; Lv, S. Identification of Early Salt Stress Responsive Proteins in Seedling Roots of Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Employing ITRAQ-Based Proteomic Technique. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Chen, Z.C.; Yamaji, N.; Horie, T.; Che, J.; Li, J.; An, G.; Ma, J.F. A Magnesium Transporter OsMGT1 Plays a Critical Role in Salt Tolerance in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 1837–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zhang, M.; Cao, J.; Zhang, T.; Xu, T.; Yang, L.; Li, X.; Ji, F.; Gao, Y.; Ali, S.; Zhang, Q.; et al. A Putative Plasma Membrane Na(+)/H(+) Antiporter GmSOS1 Is Critical for Salt Stress Tolerance in Glycine Max. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 870695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cao, M.-J.; Wang, Z.; Wirtz, M.; Hell, R.; Oliver, D.J.; Xiang, C.-B. SULTR3;1 Is a Chloroplast-Localized Sulfate Transporter in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013, 73, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phenotypes of salt-germinated 7-day-old seedlings of the cultivated soybean genotype C08 under 50 mM and 100 mM NaCl. Treated plants showed an overall stunted growth with decreased root and shoot growth.
Figure 1. Phenotypes of salt-germinated 7-day-old seedlings of the cultivated soybean genotype C08 under 50 mM and 100 mM NaCl. Treated plants showed an overall stunted growth with decreased root and shoot growth.
Ijms 23 13270 g001
Figure 2. Comparisons of the numbers of total identified proteins against the numbers of transmembrane domain-containing proteins among all three biological replicates in both leaf (upper panel) and root tissues (lower panel).
Figure 2. Comparisons of the numbers of total identified proteins against the numbers of transmembrane domain-containing proteins among all three biological replicates in both leaf (upper panel) and root tissues (lower panel).
Ijms 23 13270 g002
Figure 3. Gene ontology (GO) analyses and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses of whole-proteome data of leaf and root tissues under control (SC) and 50 mM and 100 mM NaCl treatments. (a) Molecular-function GO enrichment of identified proteins in leaves under control and salt treatments. (b) Molecular-function GO enrichment of identified proteins in roots under control and salt treatments. (c) KEGG pathway enrichments of control and salt-treated leaf samples. (d) KEGG pathway enrichments of control and salt-treated root samples.
Figure 3. Gene ontology (GO) analyses and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses of whole-proteome data of leaf and root tissues under control (SC) and 50 mM and 100 mM NaCl treatments. (a) Molecular-function GO enrichment of identified proteins in leaves under control and salt treatments. (b) Molecular-function GO enrichment of identified proteins in roots under control and salt treatments. (c) KEGG pathway enrichments of control and salt-treated leaf samples. (d) KEGG pathway enrichments of control and salt-treated root samples.
Ijms 23 13270 g003aIjms 23 13270 g003b
Figure 4. Overview of identified transmembrane domain-containing proteins from both leaf and root tissues in various categories based on their molecular functions, cellular components and types of proteins. (a) Venn diagram showing the numbers of commonly shared, leaf-specific and root-specific membrane proteins. (b) Distributions of membrane proteins according to molecular functions. (c) Distributions of the membrane proteins in various cellular components. (d) Classification of the membrane proteins based on their transmembrane domains.
Figure 4. Overview of identified transmembrane domain-containing proteins from both leaf and root tissues in various categories based on their molecular functions, cellular components and types of proteins. (a) Venn diagram showing the numbers of commonly shared, leaf-specific and root-specific membrane proteins. (b) Distributions of membrane proteins according to molecular functions. (c) Distributions of the membrane proteins in various cellular components. (d) Classification of the membrane proteins based on their transmembrane domains.
Ijms 23 13270 g004aIjms 23 13270 g004b
Figure 5. Up- and down-regulated membrane proteins in leaves identified using label-free quantification, with a −log10 p-value > 0.05 and |fold-change| value > 0.5. Red dots represent up-regulated proteins and blue dots represent down-regulated proteins. Gray dots represent membrane proteins with unchanged expressions.
Figure 5. Up- and down-regulated membrane proteins in leaves identified using label-free quantification, with a −log10 p-value > 0.05 and |fold-change| value > 0.5. Red dots represent up-regulated proteins and blue dots represent down-regulated proteins. Gray dots represent membrane proteins with unchanged expressions.
Ijms 23 13270 g005
Figure 6. Up- and down-regulated membrane proteins in roots identified using label-free quantification, with a −log10 p-value > 0.05 and |fold change| value > 0.5. Red dots represent up-regulated proteins and blue dots represent down-regulated proteins. Gray dots represent membrane proteins with unchanged expressions.
Figure 6. Up- and down-regulated membrane proteins in roots identified using label-free quantification, with a −log10 p-value > 0.05 and |fold change| value > 0.5. Red dots represent up-regulated proteins and blue dots represent down-regulated proteins. Gray dots represent membrane proteins with unchanged expressions.
Ijms 23 13270 g006
Figure 7. Gene expressions of up- and down-regulated membrane proteins in the leaf of soybean C08 upon salt treatment were consistent with the corresponding protein expression patterns. (a) Heat map of the gene expressions of key up-regulated membrane proteins in the leaf based on RPKM (reads per kilobase million mapped reads) values extracted from the published C08 transcriptomic data on the effects of 24 or 48 h of 150mM NaCl treatment [20]. (b) Heat map of the gene expressions of down-regulated membrane proteins in the leaf based on RPKM values extracted from the published C08 salt treatment transcriptomic data [20]. Red bars represent up-regulated gene expressions and blue bars represent down-regulated gene expressions of the corresponding differentially expressed proteins from this study. White bars represent unchanged gene expression levels.
Figure 7. Gene expressions of up- and down-regulated membrane proteins in the leaf of soybean C08 upon salt treatment were consistent with the corresponding protein expression patterns. (a) Heat map of the gene expressions of key up-regulated membrane proteins in the leaf based on RPKM (reads per kilobase million mapped reads) values extracted from the published C08 transcriptomic data on the effects of 24 or 48 h of 150mM NaCl treatment [20]. (b) Heat map of the gene expressions of down-regulated membrane proteins in the leaf based on RPKM values extracted from the published C08 salt treatment transcriptomic data [20]. Red bars represent up-regulated gene expressions and blue bars represent down-regulated gene expressions of the corresponding differentially expressed proteins from this study. White bars represent unchanged gene expression levels.
Ijms 23 13270 g007
Figure 8. Gene expressions of up- and down-regulated membrane proteins in the root of soybean cultivar C08 upon salt treatment were consistent with the protein expression patterns. (a) Heat map of the gene expression levels of key up-regulated membrane proteins in the root based on RPKM values extracted from the published C08 transcriptomic data on the effects of 24 or 48 h of 150 mM NaCl treatment [20]. (b) Heat map of the gene expression levels of key down-regulated membrane proteins in the root based on RPKM values extracted from the published C08 salt treatment transcriptomic data [20]. Red bars represent up-regulated gene expressions and blue bars represent down-regulated gene expressions of the corresponding differentially expressed proteins from this study. White bars represent unchanged gene expression levels.
Figure 8. Gene expressions of up- and down-regulated membrane proteins in the root of soybean cultivar C08 upon salt treatment were consistent with the protein expression patterns. (a) Heat map of the gene expression levels of key up-regulated membrane proteins in the root based on RPKM values extracted from the published C08 transcriptomic data on the effects of 24 or 48 h of 150 mM NaCl treatment [20]. (b) Heat map of the gene expression levels of key down-regulated membrane proteins in the root based on RPKM values extracted from the published C08 salt treatment transcriptomic data [20]. Red bars represent up-regulated gene expressions and blue bars represent down-regulated gene expressions of the corresponding differentially expressed proteins from this study. White bars represent unchanged gene expression levels.
Ijms 23 13270 g008aIjms 23 13270 g008b
Table 1. Up-regulated membrane proteins under salt stress in soybean leaves.
Table 1. Up-regulated membrane proteins under salt stress in soybean leaves.
Ensemble Protein IDPrimary Protein NameArabidopsis
Identifier
No. of
Peptides
No. of PSMsMW [kDa]Calc. pI
GLYMA_09G040600Abscisic acid receptor PYL12PYL12_ARATH123916.54.83
GLYMA_11G096400COP1-interactive protein 1CIP1_ARATH2058153.24.7
GLYMA_09G222500Cation/H(+) antiporter 8CHX8_ARATH2125.710.17
GLYMA_12G036000Cation/H(+) antiporter 8CHX8_ARATH2105.610.17
GLYMA_08G155200ATP synthase subunit O,
mitochondrial
ATPO_ARATH158026.99.52
GLYMA_09G091000NADH dehydrogenase
[ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 6
NDUA6_ARATH64517.17.81
GLYMA_05G058000NADH dehydrogenase
[ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 8, mitochondrial
NDUB8_ARATH3913.57.97
GLYMA_11G107300Synaptotagmin-1SYT1_ARATH5861.76.73
GLYMA_05G064300Ras-related protein RABD2c
(AtRABD2c)
RAD2C_ARATH93022.65.71
GLYMA_02G308100Transmembrane emp24
domain-containing protein p24beta2
P24B2_ARATH2725.46.47
GLYMA_09G030400Coatomer subunit epsilon-1COPE1_ARATH1432.35.57
GLYMA_08G224400V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A (V-ATPase subunit A)VATA_ARATH3427668.75.67
GLYMA_05G214200V-type proton ATPase subunit E3 (V-ATPase subunit E3)VATE3_ARATH2212327.66.8
GLYMA_08G020300V-type proton ATPase subunit E1 (V-ATPase subunit E1)VATE1_ARATH2114126.86.25
GLYMA_14G076000Outer envelope pore protein 24B, chloroplasticOP24B_ARATH148323.79.26
GLYMA_14G214700Probable inactive receptor kinase At1g48480Y1848_ARATH2268.17.2
GLYMA_09G271500Probable receptor-like protein
kinase At5g24010
Y5241_ARATH31335.47.84
GLYMA_12G167500Uncharacterized protein At5g49945Y5994_ARATH71750.86.34
GLYMA_08G136200Annexin D2ANXD2_ARATH143135.66.46
GLYMA_10G154700Mitochondrial Rho GTPase 1 (AtMIRO1)MIRO1_ARATH1471.95.59
GLYMA_11G120200Probable NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (quinone) FQR1-like 2FQRL2_ARATH93727.36
GLYMA_02G028200Metalloendoproteinase 5-MMP (At5-MMP)5MMP_ARATH2343.89.09
GLYMA_13G276500Proton pump-interactor 1PPI1_ARATH3617369.39
GLYMA_12G207500Prohibitin-2, mitochondrial (Atphb2)PHB2_ARATH2010537.19.63
GLYMA_18G230500Uncharacterized protein At3g61260Y3126_ARATH124020.18.7
GLYMA_09G271800Protein RETICULATA-RELATED 3, chloroplasticRER3_ARATH4436.98.27
GLYMA_12G207600Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan
protein 9
FLA9_ARATH1715926.39.11
GLYMA_19G180700Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan
protein 11
FLA11_ARATH1626.35.85
GLYMA_02G012400Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5C-2CX5C2_ARATH7417.18.59
GLYMA_10G012800Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5C-2CX5C2_ARATH7477.18.59
GLYMA_01G064700Protein trichome birefringence-like 37TBL37_ARATH1921.86.64
GLYMA_11G179300Alternative NAD(P)H-ubiquinone oxidoreductase C1,
chloroplastic/mitochondrial
NDC1_ARATH3123839.39.42
GLYMA_18G062900Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase CYP19-4 (PPIase CYP19-4)CP19D_ARATH72821.99.17
GLYMA_19G129500Rhomboid-like protein 20 (AtRBL20)RBL20_ARATH2636.610.02
GLYMA_15G016300Photosystem I reaction center
subunit VI-2, chloroplastic
PSAH2_ARATH62814.99.99
GLYMA_01G181700Probable serine/threonine-protein kinase PBL19PBL19_ARATH1141.98.73
GLYMA_02G272600Protein RESTRICTED TEV
MOVEMENT 2
RTM2_ARATH72128.98.02
GLYMA_14G039100Elongation factor 1-beta 1
(EF-1-beta 1)
EF1B1_ARATH71524.24.68
GLYMA_13G153000Ras-related protein RABF2a
(AtRABF2a)
RAF2A_ARATH31325.67.3
GLYMA_18G048200Protein TIC 40, chloroplasticTIC40_ARATH82647.36.44
GLYMA_11G122300Mitochondrial import receptor
subunit TOM6 homolog
TOM6_ARATH246.29.61
GLYMA_13G088700Annexin D1ANXD1_ARATH135235.96.96
GLYMA_07G060800Sugar transport protein 7STP7_ARATH41227.210.08
GLYMA_04G015000Monosaccharide-sensing protein 2MSSP2_ARATH2778.75.72
GLYMA_07G130200Protein DETOXIFICATION 50 (AtDTX50)DTX50_ARATH3168.78.53
GLYMA_13G295500ADP, ATP carrier protein 3,
mitochondrial
ADT3_ARATH2112939.69.85
GLYMA_12G066300Aquaporin NIP2-1NIP21_ARATH6297.810.61
GLYMA_12G095500Putative purine permease 20 (AtPUP20)PUP20_ARATH49279.39
GLYMA_16G026500Succinate dehydrogenase subunit 8, mitochondrialSDH8_ARATH275.78.62
GLYMA_05G067900RING-H2 finger protein ATL28ATL28_ARATH116.48.69
PSM, peptide spectrum matches; pI, isoelectric point.
Table 2. Down-regulated membrane proteins under salt stress in soybean leaves.
Table 2. Down-regulated membrane proteins under salt stress in soybean leaves.
Ensemble Protein IDsPrimary Protein NameArbidopsis
Identifier
PeptidesPSMsMW [kDa]Calc. pI
GLYMA_02G147200RAN GTPase-activating
protein 1
(AtRanGAP1; RanGAP1)
RAGP1_ARATH3357.74.78
GLYMA_02G305400Chlorophyll a-b binding protein 2.1, chloroplasticCB21_ARATH84028.65.66
GLYMA_03G056700Temperature-sensitive sn-2 acyl-lipid omega-3 desaturase (ferredoxin), chloroplasticFAD3D_ARATH2851.37.71
GLYMA_03G179500Syntaxin-71 (AtSYP71)SYP71_ARATH3929.75.94
GLYMA_04G019100ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH 5, chloroplastic (AtFTSH5)FTSH5_ARATH189074.16.19
GLYMA_04G107400Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM44-2TI442_ARATH1254.48.82
GLYMA_05G147700Non-specific lipid transfer protein GPI-anchored 1 (AtLTPG-1; Protein
LTP-GPI-ANCHORED 1)
LTPG1_ARATH29198.24
GLYMA_05G246900PRA1 family protein B5 (AtPRA1.B5)PR1B5_ARATH1422.68.66
GLYMA_07G049000Protein CURVATURE THYLAKOID 1B, chloroplasticCUT1B_ARATH1318.18.76
GLYMA_07G057200Rhodanese-like
domain-containing protein 4, chloroplastic
STR4_ARATH144346.46.23
GLYMA_08G074000Photosystem I chlorophyll
a/b-binding protein 5,
chloroplastic (Lhca5)
LHCA5_ARATH2527.47.49
GLYMA_09G114500Exocyst complex component SEC3A (AtSec3a)SEC3A_ARATH121015.87
GLYMA_09G134500Protein SRC2 homolog (AtSRC2)SRC2_ARATH51830.35.03
GLYMA_10G256000Photosystem I reaction center subunit N, chloroplastic
(PSI-N)
PSAN_ARATH62015.49.67
GLYMA_11G054900PI-PLC X domain-containing protein At5g67130Y5713_ARATH72446.17.5
GLYMA_11G135900Protein PLASTID TRANSCRIPTIONALLY ACTIVE 16, chloroplastic (pTAC16)PTA16_ARATH3513655.58.65
GLYMA_12G059600Protein PLASTID TRANSCRIPTIONALLY ACTIVE 16, chloroplastic (pTAC16)PTA16_ARATH32131558.03
GLYMA_13G028200Photosystem II protein D1
(PSII D1 protein)
PSBA_ARATH34329.85.14
GLYMA_16G165200Chlorophyll a-b binding protein 1, chloroplasticCB1C_ARATH1461285.41
GLYMA_19G007700Beta carbonic anhydrase 1, chloroplastic
(AtbCA1; AtbetaCA1)
BCA1_ARATH3436.77.43
GLYMA_19G147400Delta(12)-fatty-acid desaturaseFAD6E_ARATH2543.88.46
PSM, peptide spectrum matches; pI, isoelectric point.
Table 3. Up-regulated membrane proteins under salt stress in soybean roots.
Table 3. Up-regulated membrane proteins under salt stress in soybean roots.
Ensembl Protein IDPrimary Protein NameArabidopsis IdentifierNo. of
Peptides
No. of PSMsMW [kDa]Calc. pI
GLYMA_01G181700Probable serine/threonine-protein
kinase PBL19
PBL19_ARATH1141.98.73
GLYMA_02G287000Peroxisomal and mitochondrial division factor 2PMD2_ARATH164934.95.1
GLYMA_04G174800ATPase 11, plasma membrane-typePMA11_ARATH1962105.26.73
GLYMA_04G240400Vacuolar protein sorting-associated
protein 45 homolog (AtVPS45)
VPS45_ARATH1264.96.77
GLYMA_05G078000Wall-associated receptor kinase-like 6WAKLF_ARATH1125.29.41
GLYMA_05G215100COP1-interactive protein 1CIP1_ARATH813139.44.94
GLYMA_06G161400Bidirectional sugar transporter SWEET15 (AtSWEET15)SWT15_ARATH4868.75.67
GLYMA_08G020300V-type proton ATPase subunit E1
(V-ATPase subunit E1)
VATE1_ARATH2114126.86.25
GLYMA_08G021400COP1-interactive protein 1CIP1_ARATH11162.55.01
GLYMA_08G100800Probable LRR receptor-like
serine/threonine-protein kinase At1g67720
Y1677_ARATH12104.36.68
GLYMA_08G348200Alpha-mannosidase I MNS4MNS4_ARATH2226.89.2
GLYMA_10G024000Phospholipid:diacylglycerol
acyltransferase 1 (AtPDAT)
PDAT1_ARATH1221.610.18
GLYMA_10G107700Calcium-transporting ATPase 4, plasma membrane-typeACA4_ARATH830113.96.37
GLYMA_10G132300Ammonium transporter 1 member 1 (AtAMT1;1)AMT11_ARATH1553.37.3
GLYMA_10G218800Somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 1 (AtSERK1)SERK1_ARATH2868.95.73
GLYMA_10G220100Ras-related protein RABG3a
(AtRABG3a)
RAG3A_ARATH3523.15.68
GLYMA_11G146900Receptor-like protein 4 (AtRLP4)RLP4_ARATH1216.49.6
GLYMA_11G250100Mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM20-2TO202_ARATH2922.55.21
GLYMA_12G028300Delta(24)-sterol reductaseDIM_ARATH1181668.22
GLYMA_13G101400Caffeoylshikimate esteraseCSE_ARATH1136.77.06
GLYMA_14G126300Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 7-2QCR72_ARATH1617014.69.61
GLYMA_15G072100Clathrin light chain 1CLC1_ARATH3113935.35.19
GLYMA_15G222300Calcium-dependent protein kinase 2CDPK2_ARATH1158.85.77
GLYMA_16G154200Putative syntaxin-131 (AtSYP131)SY131_ARATH2434.87.94
GLYMA_18G141900High affinity nitrate transporter 2.5 (AtNRT2:5)NRT25_ARATH11055.59.2
GLYMA_20G217100Early nodulin-like protein 1ENL1_ARATH1321.57.46
PSM, peptide spectrum matches; pI, isoelectric point.
Table 4. Down-regulated membrane proteins under salt stress in soybean roots.
Table 4. Down-regulated membrane proteins under salt stress in soybean roots.
Ensembl Protein IDPrimary Protein NameArabidopsis
Identifier
No. of PeptidesNo. of PSMsMW [kDa]Calc. pI
GLYMA_01G007700Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM17-2TI172_ARATH41420.95.12
GLYMA_02G086600Binding partner of ACD11 1BPA1_ARATH2233.75.45
GLYMA_02G307700Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein 7FLA7_ARATH2627.15.29
GLYMA_02G309400Transmembrane 9 superfamily member 12TMN12_ARATH2475.16.86
GLYMA_03G190500Bifunctional enolase 2/transcriptional activatorENO2_ARATH104547.65.69
GLYMA_04G095900Tetratricopeptide repeat
domain-containing protein PYG7,
chloroplastic
PYG7_ARATH72024.18.7
GLYMA_04G181000Probable cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel 16CNG16_ARATH1179.49.16
GLYMA_04G220400Probable inactive receptor kinase At5g10020Y5020_ARATH11113.67.11
GLYMA_04G222800Probable LRR receptor-like
serine/threonine-protein kinase IRK
IRK_ARATH11104.76.61
GLYMA_05G016100CHAPERONE-LIKE PROTEIN OF POR1, chloroplastic (AtCPP1)CPP1_ARATH1128.39.88
GLYMA_05G199200Calnexin homolog 1CALX1_ARATH41461.64.91
GLYMA_06G019400ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH 5, chloroplastic (AtFTSH5)FTSH5_ARATH61374.36.24
GLYMA_06G066400ER membrane protein complex subunit 7 homologY4213_ARATH114723.38.76
GLYMA_07G014400Probable mitochondrial-processing
peptidase subunit alpha-1,
mitochondrial
MPPA1_ARATH177654.46.27
GLYMA_07G059400SUN domain-containing protein 1
(AtSUN1)
SUN1_ARATH178.56.54
GLYMA_08G348000Galacturonosyltransferase 8GAUT8_ARATH1164.19.16
GLYMA_09G035300ABC transporter G family member 19 (ABC transporter ABCG.19; AtABCG19)AB19G_ARATH94712.25.07
GLYMA_09G114500Exocyst complex component SEC3A (AtSec3a)SEC3A_ARATH121015.87
GLYMA_09G243700Subtilisin-like protease SBT5.4SBT54_ARATH51084.39.14
GLYMA_10G208300Ras-related protein RABF1 (AtRABF1)RABF1_ARATH1421.77.14
GLYMA_10G211000Aquaporin PIP2-2PIP22_ARATH1231.77.85
GLYMA_11G122300Mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM6 homologTOM6_ARATH246.29.61
GLYMA_11G142300Ras-related protein RABE1c (AtRABE1c)RAE1C_ARATH103523.67.83
GLYMA_12G134800Early nodulin-like protein 1ENL1_ARATH2722.86.92
GLYMA_12G205400ADP, ATP carrier protein 3,
mitochondrial
ADT3_ARATH1912339.49.79
GLYMA_13G058400Membrane-anchored ubiquitin-fold protein 2 (AtMUB2)MUB2_ARATH3712.66.09
GLYMA_14G076000Outer envelope pore protein 24B,
chloroplastic
OP24B_ARATH148323.79.26
GLYMA_14G201500Protein TIC110, chloroplasticTI110_ARATH1035109.86.19
GLYMA_15G205900Temperature-induced lipocalin-1
(AtTIL1)
TIL_ARATH3921.28.07
GLYMA_16G1666002-succinyl-6-hydroxy-2,4-
cyclohexadiene-1-carboxylate synthase
PHYLO_ARATH3912.66.86
GLYMA_17G021200Probable prolyl 4-hydroxylase 4 (AtP4H4)P4H4_ARATH1144337.24
GLYMA_20G006500Proton pump-interactor 1PPI1_ARATH34161.14.51
PSM, peptide spectrum matches; pI, isoelectric point.
Table 5. Salt-stress-inducible membrane proteins in soybean leaves.
Table 5. Salt-stress-inducible membrane proteins in soybean leaves.
Ensembl Protein IDPrimary Protein NameArabidopsis
Identifier
No. of
Peptides
No. of PSMsMW [kDa]Calc. pI
GLYMA_05G019400ABC transporter B family member 27 (ABC transporter ABCB.27; AtABCB27)AB27B_ARATH1168.58.46
GLYMA_01G194500ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 8a (AtARL8a)ARL8A_ARATH4520.58.15
GLYMA_16G076500AP-4 complex subunit epsilonAP4E_ARATH11107.45.92
GLYMA_12G172500Aquaporin PIP2-2PIP22_ARATH1230.88.13
GLYMA_09G056300ATPase 2, plasma membrane-typePMA2_ARATH2444112.46.42
GLYMA_04G203800Bidirectional sugar transporter SWEET15 (AtSWEET15)SWT15_ARATH2267.16.11
GLYMA_06G324300Cellulose synthase-like protein G1 (AtCslG1)CSLG1_ARATH4879.58.57
GLYMA_12G095700Chaperone protein dnaJ 2 (AtDjA2)DNAJ2_ARATH5746.36.28
GLYMA_17G030700COBRA-like protein 7COBL7_ARATH1170.46.89
GLYMA_07G202300Cytochrome P450 705A20C75AK_ARATH2258.99.01
GLYMA_07G189900External alternative
NAD(P)H-ubiquinone oxidoreductase B2, mitochondrial
NDB2_ARATH2465.27.65
GLYMA_09G267700Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein 10FLA10_ARATH144142.55.97
GLYMA_12G069300Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein 11FLA11_ARATH1227.88.88
GLYMA_02G308700Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein 2FLA2_ARATH92343.56.87
GLYMA_02G307700Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein 7FLA7_ARATH2227.15.29
GLYMA_05G032500GDP-mannose transporter GONST2GONS2_ARATH116.17.24
GLYMA_11G118500Guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit betaGBB_ARATH14417.27
GLYMA_06G188900HIPL1 proteinHIPL1_ARATH12755.17
GLYMA_05G029800Hypersensitive-induced response
protein 1 (AtHIR1)
HIR1_ARATH111831.37.01
GLYMA_15G248900Interactor of constitutive active ROPs 1ICR1_ARATH11425.76
GLYMA_02G079400Light-harvesting complex-like protein OHP2, chloroplasticOHP2_ARATH51219.88.87
GLYMA_14G099800Mitochondrial carrier protein CoAc1COAC1_ARATH1229.610.04
GLYMA_08G115600Mitochondrial dicarboxylate/tricarboxylate transporter DTCDTC_ARATH820329.35
GLYMA_13G096000Mitochondrial outer membrane protein porin 4VDAC4_ARATH82229.78.57
GLYMA_19G101100Mitochondrial phosphate carrier protein 3, mitochondrialMPCP3_ARATH61439.89.26
GLYMA_09G114000Outer envelope pore protein 24B,
chloroplastic
OP24B_ARATH176923.79.26
GLYMA_18G297700Piezo-type mechanosensitive ion
channel homolog
PIEZO_ARATH2221.19.85
GLYMA_06G020400Plastocyanin minor isoform,
chloroplastic
PLAS1_ARATH1216.85.2
GLYMA_20G141900Probable dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide-subunit 3BOST3B_ARATH2237.89.25
GLYMA_15G064700Probable NAD(P)H dehydrogenase
(quinone) FQR1-like 1
FQRL1_ARATH173721.76.95
GLYMA_13G212700Probable prolyl 4-hydroxylase 4 (AtP4H4)P4H4_ARATH92133.35.81
GLYMA_08G288900SUPPRESSOR OF QUENCHING 1,
chloroplastic
SOQ1_ARATH2344.18.41
GLYMA_13G307600Putative syntaxin-131 (AtSYP131)SY131_ARATH6834.57.49
GLYMA_07G028500Pyrophosphate-energized vacuolar membrane proton pump 1AVP1_ARATH2580.75.58
GLYMA_11G118800Ras-related protein RABG3f (AtRABG3f)RAG3F_ARATH23235.19
GLYMA_11G146900Receptor-like protein 4 (AtRLP4)RLP4_ARATH1116.49.6
GLYMA_07G072100Serine/threonine-protein kinase BSK3BSK3_ARATH1155.26.1
GLYMA_02G275500SNF1-related protein kinase regulatory subunit beta-1 (AKIN subunit beta-1; AKINB1; AKINbeta1)KINB1_ARATH1130.86.32
GLYMA_04G246100Sucrose transport protein SUC9SUC9_ARATH1114.89.25
GLYMA_17G152900Tobamovirus multiplication protein 2A (AtTOM2A)TOM2A_ARATH2631.55.36
GLYMA_10G243500Transmembrane emp24
domain-containing protein p24beta3
P24B3_ARATH2223.97.09
GLYMA_19G093900Triacylglycerol lipase SDP1SDP1_ARATH148.59.47
GLYMA_03G214700UDP-glucuronic acid decarboxylase 2UXS2_ARATH102948.17.97
GLYMA_14G035500Vesicle-associated membrane protein 713 (AtVAMP713)VA713_ARATH34259.42
GLYMA_20G014300Auxin efflux carrier component 3 (AtPIN3)PIN3_ARATH1172.27.64
GLYMA_16G038800Binding partner of ACD11 1BPA1_ARATH2429.99.11
GLYMA_05G204300Gamma carbonic anhydrase-like 1,
mitochondrial
(AtCAL1; GAMMA CAL1)
GCAL1_ARATH94227.78.18
GLYMA_09G009300Mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 4MPC4_ARATH1410.510.36
GLYMA_09G271600NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 1NDUA1_ARATH4277.38.88
GLYMA_13G212700Probable prolyl 4-hydroxylase 4 (AtP4H4)P4H4_ARATH61133.35.81
GLYMA_05G150300Protein TIC 22-like, chloroplasticTI22L_ARATH2228.28.4
GLYMA_01G036200RAN GTPase-activating protein 1 (AtRanGAP1; RanGAP1)RAGP1_ARATH1165.18.07
GLYMA_16G090700RPM1-interacting protein 4RIN4_ARATH1127.18.29
GLYMA_19G093900Triacylglycerol lipase SDP1SDP1_ARATH138.59.47
GLYMA_07G008600UDP-glucuronate 4-epimerase 4GAE4_ARATH1114.611.84
GLYMA_14G043500Very-long-chain enoyl-CoA reductaseTECR_ARATH3935.99.63
GLYMA_05G214200V-type proton ATPase subunit E3
(V-ATPase subunit E3)
VATE3_ARATH102227.66.8
PSM, peptide spectrum matches; pI, isoelectric point.
Table 6. Salt-stress-inducible membrane proteins in soybean roots.
Table 6. Salt-stress-inducible membrane proteins in soybean roots.
Ensembl Protein IDPrimary Protein NameArabidopsis
Identifier
No. of
Peptides
No. of PSMsMW [kDa]Calc. pI
GLYMA_13G220000ABC transporter C family member 2
(ABC transporter ABCC.2; AtABCC2)
AB2C_ARATH22181.76.61
GLYMA_11G098800ABC transporter G family member 8
(ABC transporter ABCG.8; AtABCG8)
AB8G_ARATH1421.29.44
GLYMA_12G094000Alternative NAD(P)H-ubiquinone
oxidoreductase C1,
chloroplastic/mitochondrial
NDC1_ARATH42939.58.19
GLYMA_10G167800Ammonium transporter 1 member 2
(AtAMT1;2)
AMT12_ARATH1253.67.44
GLYMA_11G119800Arabinosyltransferase RRA3RRA3_ARATH1149.48.78
GLYMA_04G162800ATP synthase subunit gamma,
mitochondrial
ATPG3_ARATH94235.29.29
GLYMA_06G019400ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH 5, chloroplastic (AtFTSH5)FTSH5_ARATH3474.36.24
GLYMA_16G204600Bifunctional enolase 2/transcriptional
activator
ENO2_ARATH417486.47
GLYMA_16G038800Binding partner of ACD11 1BPA1_ARATH2429.99.11
GLYMA_08G180800AtBAK1; BRI1-associated receptor kinase 1BAK1_ARATH1267.95.59
GLYMA_12G095700Chaperone protein dnaJ 2 (AtDjA2)DNAJ2_ARATH51546.36.28
GLYMA_12G040500Coatomer subunit deltaCOPD_ARATH1258.45.59
GLYMA_11G118600Coatomer subunit gammaCOPG_ARATH4798.75.15
GLYMA_11G063400Cystinosin homologCTNS_ARATH1242.98.12
GLYMA_05G110100Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6a,
mitochondrial (AtCOX6a)
COX6A_ARATH54111.59.09
GLYMA_17G157000Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6a,
mitochondrial (AtCOX6a)
COX6A_ARATH54111.69.35
GLYMA_06G176200Cytochrome P450 71A22C71AM_ARATH1158.57.36
GLYMA_10G286200Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (quinone), mitochondrial (DHOdehase)PYRD_ARATH1248.39.31
GLYMA_13G171700Dolichol-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 1DPM1_ARATH1129.39.54
GLYMA_09G129900DUF21 domain-containing protein At5g52790Y5279_ARATH1139.18.59
GLYMA_07G170200E3 ubiquitin protein ligase RIE1RIE1_ARATH1139.66.34
GLYMA_16G071500EIN2-CENDEIN2_ARATH11486.84.31
GLYMA_02G276600Elongation factor 1-beta 1 (EF-1-beta 1)EF1B1_ARATH114324.34.68
GLYMA_20G194100Exocyst complex component EXO70A1 (AtExo70a1)E70A1_ARATH1372.97.2
GLYMA_17G260400Expansin-A11 (AtEXPA11)EXP11_ARATH1227.58.84
GLYMA_08G239300FT-interacting protein 1FTIP1_ARATH12117.18.57
GLYMA_04G013100Guanine nucleotide-binding protein
subunit beta
GBB_ARATH11417.44
GLYMA_17G124900High-affinity nitrate transporter 3.1NRT31_ARATH1123.29.09
GLYMA_05G133700LysM domain-containing GPI-anchored protein 2LYM2_ARATH1340.27.24
GLYMA_10G057000Membrane magnesium transporterMMGT_ARATH1111.97.03
GLYMA_10G049900Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM14-1TI141_ARATH1212.210.13
GLYMA_07G193700Mitochondrial inner membrane protein OXA1OXA1_ARATH1347.19.35
GLYMA_01G157300Monosaccharide-sensing protein 3MSSP3_ARATH2379.46.18
GLYMA_03G114600Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 3-2, chloroplastic (OEE3)PSBQ2_ARATH2424.89.85
GLYMA_12G001900Patellin-3PATL3_ARATH2648.95.44
GLYMA_14G199000Sorting nexin 2BSNX2B_ARATH3562.35.5
GLYMA_08G180400Sulfate transporter 1.3SUT13_ARATH1371.99.32
GLYMA_10G195800Sulfoquinovosyl transferase SQD2SQD2_ARATH1155.46.83
GLYMA_13G185300SUN domain-containing protein 1
(AtSUN1)
SUN1_ARATH1150.58.19
GLYMA_12G032400Synaptotagmin-2SYT2_ARATH31161.66.65
GLYMA_18G215900Thioredoxin H9 (AtTrxh9)TRXH9_ARATH1215.75.17
GLYMA_07G010300Transmembrane 9 superfamily member 7TMN7_ARATH2473.78.32
GLYMA_08G193400Transmembrane 9 superfamily member 7TMN7_ARATH2473.68.22
GLYMA_16G054600Triacylglycerol lipase SDP1SDP1_ARATH248.79.7
GLYMA_03G214700UDP-glucuronic acid decarboxylase 2UXS2_ARATH103748.17.97
GLYMA_07G119500Vacuolar protein-sorting-associated protein 11 homolog (AtVPS11)VPS11_ARATH12109.46
GLYMA_15G044700V-type proton ATPase subunit a1
(V-ATPase subunit a1)
VHAA1_ARATH2794.26.4
GLYMA_20G106500V-type proton ATPase subunit B2
(V-ATPase subunit B2)
VATB2_ARATH3321054.25.02
GLYMA_02G065500V-type proton ATPase subunit C
(V-ATPase subunit C)
VATC_ARATH135042.55.95
PSM, peptide spectrum matches; pI, isoelectric point.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rehman, H.M.; Chen, S.; Zhang, S.; Khalid, M.; Uzair, M.; Wilmarth, P.A.; Ahmad, S.; Lam, H.-M. Membrane Proteomic Profiling of Soybean Leaf and Root Tissues Uncovers Salt-Stress-Responsive Membrane Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13270. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113270

AMA Style

Rehman HM, Chen S, Zhang S, Khalid M, Uzair M, Wilmarth PA, Ahmad S, Lam H-M. Membrane Proteomic Profiling of Soybean Leaf and Root Tissues Uncovers Salt-Stress-Responsive Membrane Proteins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(21):13270. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113270

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rehman, Hafiz Mamoon, Shengjie Chen, Shoudong Zhang, Memoona Khalid, Muhammad Uzair, Phillip A. Wilmarth, Shakeel Ahmad, and Hon-Ming Lam. 2022. "Membrane Proteomic Profiling of Soybean Leaf and Root Tissues Uncovers Salt-Stress-Responsive Membrane Proteins" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 21: 13270. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113270

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop