Next Article in Journal
Paracrine and Autocrine Effects of VEGF Are Enhanced in Human eMSC Spheroids
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Different Nutritional and Environmental Parameters on Microbial Pyrene Degradation by Mangrove Culturable Bacteria
Previous Article in Journal
TERT Promoter Mutations as Simple and Non-Invasive Urinary Biomarkers for the Detection of Urothelial Bladder Cancer in a High-Risk Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
PUF-Immobilized Bjerkandera adusta DSM 3375 as a Tool for Bioremediation of Creosote Oil Contaminated Soil
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Biodegradation and Metabolic Pathway of the Neonicotinoid Insecticide Thiamethoxam by Labrys portucalensis F11

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(22), 14326; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214326
by Oumeima Boufercha 1,2, Ana R. Monforte 3, Allaoueddine Boudemagh 2, António C. Ferreira 3, Paula M. L. Castro 3 and Irina S. Moreira 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(22), 14326; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214326
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 6 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 18 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodegradation of Pollutants in the Environment: Omics Approaches 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled Biodegradation and metabolic pathway of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam by Labrys portucalensis F11 submitted by Bouferchaet al. investigates biotransformation of neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam by Gram negative bacterium Labrys portucalensis F11. The results are within the scope of IJMS. Biodegradation of TMX has been extensively studied by other authors so the paper (in my opinion) does not present significant novelty. The quality of figures must be improved. My review comments that should be addressed before publication: 

 

Line 94-99: The novelty of the study should be highlighted. The authors should provide more details about ecotoxicology experiments.

 

Line 102: Biodegradation is not shown in Figure 1. The results of biodegradation experiments are presented in Figure 1. The authors should correct this in the entire manuscript.

 

Line 111: The authors should provide data regarding control samples. 

 

Line 126: What was the reason of choosing such concentrations of TMX? 

 

Line 199: The quality of Fig 3 must be improved.

 

Fig 4 contains too many figures. These data should be compressed to present the most important results of the experiments. The Y axes should have identical scale. At the present form, the result are very confusing.

 

Line 443: Conclusion section must be rewritten to highlight research hypothesis or research question and major findings. Also, the reader must know what contribution the study has made to the existing literature.

 

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In the paper, the author pointed Biodegradation and metabolic pathway of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam by Labrys portucalensis F11. I strongly recommend this article is worthy to publish in the journal after correction of some points described below:

1.       The aim of the work should be redrafted. The aim of the study cannot be to determine the ability of Labrys portucalensis F11 to biodegrade TMX, because it is obvious.

2.       Fig.2. data on the experimental system without bacteria (control) are missing.

3.       The quality of signatures in Figure 3 should be improved.

4.        Line 228. Sentence L. portucalensis F11 was able to degrade TMX ”. It is obvious and dos not introduces nothing new to work.

5.       I cannot refer to supplementary materials, I do not have access to them.

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Thiamethoxam (TMX) is a widespread use insecticide. It is very persistent in the soil. Growing concerns about the risks posed by TMX against non-target organisms and the quality of water resources have prompted researchers to focus on the removal of it. In the manuscription, the author isolates one strain, Labrys portucalensis F11. F11 can degrade TMX (10.8 mg L-1) more than 90% was removed in 3 days. Overall, it is a well-written paper, but I have two small questions below.

1. The language needs to be checked. 

2. Please provides the figure of UPLC-QTOF/MS/MS in the text.

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I accept the revised manuscript

Back to TopTop