Next Article in Journal
An Engineered Nanocomplex with Photodynamic and Photothermal Synergistic Properties for Cancer Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Ubiquitination of Receptorsomes, Frontline of Plant Immunity
Previous Article in Journal
Nuclear and Membrane Receptors for Sex Steroids Are Involved in the Regulation of Delta/Serrate/LAG-2 Proteins in Rodent Sertoli Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nitric Oxide Signaling and Its Association with Ubiquitin-Mediated Proteasomal Degradation in Plants
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

How Many Faces Does the Plant U-Box E3 Ligase Have?

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(4), 2285; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042285
by Xinguo Mao 1,*,†, Chunmei Yu 1,†, Long Li 1, Min Wang 1, Lili Yang 1, Yining Zhang 1, Yanfei Zhang 1, Jingyi Wang 1, Chaonan Li 1, Matthew Paul Reynolds 2,* and Ruilian Jing 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(4), 2285; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042285
Submission received: 29 December 2021 / Revised: 4 February 2022 / Accepted: 8 February 2022 / Published: 18 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ubiquitylation in Plant Developmental and Physiological Processes)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

The manuscript entitled "How many faces does the plant U-box E3 ligase have?" is a well-thought-out and written review paper. Of course, more can always be written. The work has a logical layout. I would suggest swapping sections 6.1. and 6.2. and 6.5. and 6.6.

At the beginning of the introduction, there is a piece of text leftover from the template. When you give the Latin name of the species for the first time, use the full name together with the authority. 

Author Response

Point 1: I would suggest swapping sections 6.1. and 6.2. and 6.5. and 6.6.

Response 1: We swapped the sections according to the reviewer’s suggstion.

 

Point 2: At the beginning of the introduction, there is a piece of text leftover from the template. When you give the Latin name of the species for the first time, use the full name together with the authority. 

Response 2: We removed the template and revised the Latin names of species acorrdingly.

Reviewer 2 Report

I don't have any further comments on this manuscript since it is well written and easy to understand. As a person not familiar with PUB genes, the manuscript offers much information regarding the speciality of PUBs. There are only a few minor errors that need to be revised. 

  1. The first paragraph is the comment from a reviewer? It is not the context.
  2. Line108, this is an error. 
  3. Line 768 has a similar error. 
  4. I would like to suggest the authors produce a schematic that PUBs are involved in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. 

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2 Comments

 

Point 1: The first paragraph is the comment from a reviewer? It is not the context.

Response 1: Sorry, it is the template. We removed it from the revised MS.

 

Point 2: Line108, this is an error. 

Response 2: The error was deleted.

 

Point 3: Line 768 has a similar error. 

Response 3: The error was removed.

 

Point 4: I would like to suggest the authors produce a schematic that PUBs are involved in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. 

Response 4: We added a schematic in the conclusion section.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop