Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Gel Containing a Propionibacterium Extract in an In Vivo Model of Wound Healing
Previous Article in Journal
Aluminium Nanoparticles as Efficient Adjuvants Compared to Their Microparticle Counterparts: Current Progress and Perspectives
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms23094705
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Notch–Sox9 Axis Mediates Hepatocyte Dedifferentiation in KrasG12V-Induced Zebrafish Hepatocellular Carcinoma

by
Junhui Sun
,
Qi Chen
and
Jianlong Ma
*
Institute of Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing 400715, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(9), 4705; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094705
Submission received: 23 March 2022 / Revised: 18 April 2022 / Accepted: 21 April 2022 / Published: 24 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Oncology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Liver cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in humans. Hepatocytes normally undergo dedifferentiation after the onset of hepatocellular carcinoma, which in turn facilitates the progression of cancer. Although the process of hepatocellular carcinoma dedifferentiation is of significant research and clinical value, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying it are still not fully characterized. We constructed a zebrafish liver cancer model based on overexpression of the oncogene krasG12V to investigate the hepatocyte dedifferentiation in hepatocellular carcinoma. We found that, after hepatocarcinogenesis, hepatocytes dedifferentiated and the Notch signaling pathway was upregulated in this progress. Furthermore, we found that inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway or deficiency of sox9b both prevented hepatocyte dedifferentiation following hepatocellular carcinoma induction, reducing cancer metastasis and improving survival. In conclusion, we found that hepatocytes undergo dedifferentiation after hepatocarcinogenesis, a process that requires Notch signaling and likewise the activation of Sox9.

1. Introduction

Primary liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide as of 2020, with approximately 906,000 new cases and 830,000 deaths. Primary liver cancer includes hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (75%-85% of cases) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (10–15%), as well as other rare types [1]. The general lack of regular cancer screening in the vast majority of developing countries has led to liver cancer often being diagnosed at advanced stages [2]. The main risk factors for HCC are chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), aflatoxin-contaminated food, excessive alcohol abuse, excess weight, type 2 diabetes, and smoking, with major risk factors varying by region [3]. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease seems to have become increasingly common in recent years and has been noted as one of the reasons for the recurrence of liver cancer incidence in some regions [1]. Therefore, liver cancer remains a serious threat to public health, and there are still many issues to be addressed in the incidence, progression, and treatment of liver cancer. Further research on liver cancer by additional cancer models may shed light on a variety of issues. Because of their small embryos, quick growth cycle, and low cost of keeping, zebrafish are quite a suitable choice to build cancer models. They may aid in building a better understanding of the influence of differentiation in liver cancer progression, as well as the clinical translation of innovative medications and the expansion of the array of effective differentiation-based cancer therapies.
Previous studies have identified mature hepatocytes as the cells of origin of HCC [3]. These cells dedifferentiate into hepatocyte progenitor cells, which then become hepatocellular carcinoma cells that begin to express progenitor cell markers [4,5]. The clinical therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma has revealed that HCC patients with poorly differentiated tumors have a worse prognosis [6]. Differentiation therapy, which aims to induce and reverse tumor dedifferentiation, is predicted to be a potential therapeutic strategy. Dedifferentiation has been shown to be a phase in the advancement of hepatocellular carcinoma in previous investigations. As a consequence, efforts to restore the liver’s well-differentiated state may be an effective method to alleviate the poor prognosis associated with hepatocellular carcinoma treatment [7,8]. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the factors that alter the expression levels during hepatocyte dedifferentiation. We may be able to uncover more targets for differentiation therapy by investigating the changes and roles of these variables in hepatocarcinogenesis and progression.
The Notch signaling pathway is a highly conserved pathway during development. This pathway is essential for biliary cell coordination and tubule formation [9]. The structure, homeostasis, and carcinogenesis of the liver are dependent on the Notch cascade [10]. The Notch cascade reaction is activated by direct cell–cell interactions followed by cleavage of the Notch receptor extracellular domain (NECD) [11]. This structural change leads to the release of the Notch intracellular structural domain (NICD), which translocates to the nucleus and recruits coactivators, such as Mastermind-like proteins (MAML1, MAML2, or MAML3), to form a transcriptional complex responsible for the induction of Notch target genes [11]. Although there is mounting evidence that Notch signaling is involved in a variety of cancers [12,13], the relevance of Notch signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma remains controversial and its particular function is not well understood. For example, some studies have shown that expression of the constitutively active form of Notch1 has an inhibitory effect on hepatocellular carcinoma cells and that blocking Notch with a γ-secretase inhibitor (GSI) in mice promotes the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma, suggesting that Notch operates as a tumor suppressor [14,15]. However, other studies have shown that the Notch signaling pathway drives HCC tumor growth and that inhibition of this pathway has antitumor effects [16]. Recently, several studies have revealed that the Notch signaling pathway acts as a driver of liver tumors [17,18,19]. Recent studies in mouse models suggest that different isoforms of Notch may have different roles in different models of hepatocellular carcinoma, and Notch may be pleiotropic, as a hepatocellular carcinoma driver and suppressor [20,21]. Although there are many reports on the Notch signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma, the mechanism of Notch for hepatocarcinogenesis and cell migration is still not well clarified. Further study on Notch’s effect on hepatocyte dedifferentiation after hepatocarcinogenesis is important to point us in the proper direction for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.

2. Results

2.1. Induction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by DOX-Activated Tet-On System in Zebrafish

Several methods have been used to artificially induce hepatocellular carcinoma in mice and, by extension, in zebrafish [22,23]. Based on the previously reported results, we constructed a zebrafish model of liver cancer using the new generation Tet-On 3G system with mutated krasG12V as the oncogene [24,25]. The new generation Tet-On 3G has a marked improvement over the previous system with a significant reduction in basal expression and an increased sensitivity to doxycycline (DOX) [26]. Tet-On 3G systems have lower basal expression and higher sensitivity to the doxycycline (Dox) inducer than their predecessors. When compared with the previous tightest promoter, the pTRE3G promoter contains mutations that reduce background expression by 5–20-fold. Mutations in the Tet-On 3G transactivator greatly increase its sensitivity to Dox. This improved sensitivity is especially beneficial for in vivo studies in tissues where high Dox concentrations are difficult to achieve [24]. Previous studies have reported that DOX, the inducer of the Tet-On system, is devoid of noticeable toxicity, has minimal effects on the hepatic transcriptome, and does not alter the overall characteristics of hepatocytes [27]. We constructed a transgenic strain Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1)cq136 with liver-specific overexpression of the oncogene krasG12V in zebrafish using the DOX-activated Tet-On system. The DOX-treated Tg(fabp10a:Dendra2-NTR)cq1 was termed as the control group. The oncogene krasG12V, overexpressed in Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1)cq136 (krasG12V+ group) by DOX treatment (Figure 1A), and the liver of zebrafish in the krasG12V+ group was significantly enlarged compared with the control group after DOX treatment (Figure 1B and Figure S1A). Meanwhile, DOX caused no detectable effect in the control group.
Immunofluorescence staining of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a marker of cell proliferation expressed in the nuclei of cells during the DNA synthesis phase of the cell cycle [28], showed that the proportion of proliferating hepatocytes in the control group gradually decreased with the end of liver development, while the proportion of proliferating hepatocytes in the krasG12V+ group gradually increased (Figure 1C,D). At 10 days postfertilization (dpf), certain larvae showed the presence of induced hepatocytes in the intestine outside the liver, indicating the migration of hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Figure 1E). Meanwhile, we observed a green flow of hepatocytes in the blood vessels in these larvae (results not presented). The hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) staining revealed a significant histological change in the liver in the krasG12V+ group, and the loss of eosin in the krasG12V+ group indicates the fibrosis or necrosis (Figure 1F,G). Notice that due to the enlargement of the liver after carcinogenesis, the entire field of the right panel view was filled with the liver tissue. The Sirius Red staining showed fibrosis occurred in the krasG12V+ group (Figure 1H,I). From the above experiments, we concluded that specific overexpression of the protooncogene krasG12V in zebrafish by the DOX-induced Tet-On system lead to hepatocytes’ over proliferation, cell migration, and fibrosis, and these indicated that hepatocellular carcinoma was successfully induced in zebrafish.

2.2. Hepatocyte Dedifferentiation Occurred after Hepatocarcinogenesis

Cell fate in the liver is altered with hepatocarcinogenesis and, usually, biliary duct cells, and hepatocytes are drastically altered after hepatocarcinogenesis [3]. To investigate the fate of hepatocytes and biliary duct cells after hepatocarcinogenesis, we used whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) to detect hepatic progenitor cell marker genes after hepatocarcinogenesis and antibody staining to detect changes in biliary duct morphology. Previously, our group reported that liver progenitor cells express hhex, foxa3, and sox9b genes during liver regeneration [29]. WISH of the liver progenitor marker genes hhex and foxa3, and the biliary duct marker gene sox9b showed that hhex, foxa3, and sox9b expression was upregulated after hepatocarcinogenesis, indicating the hepatocytes exhibited a progenitor characteristic (Figure 2A). EMT is important in cancer progression, and E-Cadherin (CDH1) appears to be downregulated during EMT [30]. We detected CDH1 expression in the liver by antibody staining after hepatocarcinogenesis. In the control group, CDH1 signaling was expressed intensely in the biliary duct cells (Figure S1B). Meanwhile, in the krasG12V+ group, the expression pattern of CDH1 was disturbed, the biliary ducts expressing CDH1 thickened at 8 dpf, the biliary duct shape was almost lost by 10 dpf, and the expression of CDH1 in the liver was downregulated (Figure S1B). A previous article reported that Anxa4, as a biliary duct marker, also marks liver progenitor cells and had been considered as a marker of liver dedifferentiation [29,31]. Biliary duct antibody staining (anti-Anxa4) showed that the biliary ducts in the krasG12V+ group thickened after hepatocarcinogenesis, and the whole liver expressed biliary duct markers by 10 dpf (Figure 2B,C). From the above experiments, we concluded that, after hepatocarcinogenesis, the biliary duct activation occurred and hepatocytes in the liver undergo dedifferentiation along with the expression of biliary duct markers.

2.3. Hepatocyte Dedifferentiation was Suppressed by Inhibition of Notch Signaling after Hepatocarcinogenesis

The Notch signaling pathway plays an important role in liver development and regeneration [11]. In liver regeneration, Notch mediates dedifferentiation of biliary duct, and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells had been reported [29,32,33]. Therefore, we checked the expression of Notch receptors (notch1a, notch1b, notch2, and notch3), as well as the Notch target gene her15 in the control and krasG12V+ group (Figure 3A). The Notch signaling pathway was upregulated after DOX induction (Figure 3A). Therefore, we use the dominant-negative isoform of murine Mastermind-like (dnMAML) protein to inhibit the Notch signaling pathway after hepatocarcinogenesis (Figure 3B). The dnMAML is a truncated form of MAML1 retaining an N-terminal interaction domain but lacking a C-terminal act as dominant-negative inhibitors of the intracellular domain of Notch function [34]. The dnMAML binds to the Notch transcriptional complex but lacks the activity to recruit essential cofactors, thereby blocking Notch activity, already applied and shown to work on the Notch pathway in zebrafish in some work [35,36]. The Dox-treated Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1)cq136 (krasG12V+ group) and Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1)cq136 X Tg(Hsp70l:dnMAML-GFP) (krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ group) were heat-shocked simultaneously (Figure 3B). By inhibiting the Notch signaling pathway, we found that the morphological changes of biliary ducts after hepatocarcinogenesis were not completely inhibited, but the expression of biliary duct markers in hepatocytes was suppressed (Figure 3C,D). Meanwhile, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) of biliary duct marker gene sox9b showed that sox9b expression was upregulated in hepatocytes after hepatocarcinogenesis, while the expression of sox9b exhibited no upregulation in hepatocytes when Notch signaling pathway was inhibited (Figure 3E). FISH of the liver functional marker gene cp showed that cp expression was downregulated in hepatocytes after hepatocarcinogenesis and no downregulation of cp expression in hepatocytes occurred when the Notch signaling pathway was inhibited (Figure 3F). Therefore, we concluded that the Notch signaling pathway is upregulated after hepatocarcinogenesis and that inhibition of Notch after hepatocarcinogenesis suppresses the dedifferentiation of hepatocyte.

2.4. Notch–Sox9 Axis Mediates Hepatocyte Dedifferentiation

Sox9 expression in hepatocytes usually indicates that the cells are bipotential and have the ability to differentiate into both hepatocytes and biliary duct cells [37]. Previous studies have found that high Sox9 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma promotes stemness and tumorigenesis in liver cancer stem cells and is also associated with poor survival rates in patients with liver cancer [38]. The results of antibody staining of the biliary duct marker Sox9 showed that the number of Sox9-positive cells in the liver increased after hepatocarcinogenesis, and the number of Sox9-positive cells was reduced by inhibiting the Notch signaling pathway (Figure 4A–C). This is consistent with the previously reported regulation of SOX9 expression by Notch [39]. The zebrafish sox9bfh313 mutant exhibited abnormal biliary duct development [40], then we induced hepatocellular carcinoma in sox9bfh313 mutants and found that, similar to the inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway, the expression of biliary duct markers in hepatocytes was suppressed (Figure 4D–F). These data suggest that inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway suppressed Sox9 upregulation following hepatocarcinogenesis, and that sox9bfh313 mutants also exhibited suppression of hepatocyte dedifferentiation after hepatocarcinogenesis; the Notch–Sox9 axis mediates the process of hepatocyte dedifferentiation.

2.5. Inhibition of Notch Signaling Ameliorated Symptoms of Liver Cancer

Proliferative HCC is often poorly differentiated and includes tumors with progenitor characteristics [41]. Fibrosis always occurred after the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma [42]. By H&E staining and Sirius Red staining in several stages, we found that the appearance of fibrosis after hepatocarcinogenesis in different stages was effectively alleviated by inhibiting the Notch signaling pathway (Figure S2A–D). Fibrosis is characterized by excess deposition of collagens, primarily type I collagen [43]. The results of the collagen I antibody staining similarly indicated that collagen fiber accumulation in the post-cancerous liver was alleviated after inhibition of Notch signaling pathway (Figure S3A–C).
By inducing hepatocarcinogenesis before liver maturation, a more pronounced migration of cancer cells had been observed (Figure 5A). We classified zebrafish larvae into three classes based on the number of cancer cells outside the liver and how many locations they metastasized to (Figure 5B). The statistics of different groups of metastasis status showed that cancer cell migration after hepatocarcinogenesis was significantly reduced in the Notch-inhibited group, with a decrease in the number of severely metastasized zebrafish larvae and an increase in the number of moderately and mildly metastasized larvae (Figure 5C). This suggested that the migration of cancer cells can be prevented by inhibiting the Notch signaling pathway after hepatocarcinogenesis. Finally, the survival rate after hepatocarcinogenesis showed that inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway slightly improved the mortality caused by hepatocarcinoma induction (Figure 5D). In summary, when hepatocarcinoma occurred, inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway effectively alleviated cancer-induced fibrosis, reduced cancer cell migration, and improved survival. Taken together, inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway after hepatocarcinogenesis showed a positive effect on cancer progression.

3. Discussion

Hepatocellular carcinoma remains one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide due to its high morbidity, mortality, and advanced liver dysfunction [1]. Even though there are numerous treatments available to improve the survival rate of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, both liver transplantation and chemotherapy have several disadvantages for patients, particularly those with advanced stages of the disease [2,44]. For patients with advanced disease, systemic therapy is a more desirable treatment modality to improve patient survival. After the successful application of synergistic therapies for acute promyelocytic leukemia, synergistic therapies for HCC have also been proposed [45]. The genetic basis of most solid tumors is considerably more complex than in leukemia because it involves the cooperation of multiple oncogenic pathways. The purpose of differentiation therapy is to use drugs to induce the differentiation of cancer cells into benign cells or even normal cells [7,8]. It may be a new therapy for HCC to reduce the recurrence rate and improve the prognosis. In recent years, research on molecules and signaling pathways regulating the dedifferentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma has contributed to the development of new drugs [46]. Most solid tumors have a genetic base that requires the collaboration of numerous oncogenic pathways, making them far more complex than leukemia. Solid tumor differentiation is also more difficult to assess than leukemia, as tissue collection is difficult to repeat and in vitro cultures are usually difficult [45]. Therefore, further exploration of it in animal models may provide better assistance for future differentiation therapy in the treatment of liver cancer. Therefore, our model of KrasG12V-induced zebrafish liver cancer may provide an effective research tool for differentiation therapy.
Hepatocarcinogenesis is always accompanied by changes in the differentiation status of hepatocytes, which cause tumors to comprise heterogeneous cell populations with different differentiation states [47]. The differentiation state of cancer has been linked to its sensitivity to targeted therapy; although, the molecular mechanism behind this remains unknown [48]. We found that, after krasG12V induced hepatocarcinogenesis in zebrafish, the fate of hepatocytes and biliary duct cells in the liver was altered, and hepatocytes underwent dedifferentiation into progenitor cells with dual characteristics of liver and biliary ducts. The Notch signaling pathway is upregulated after hepatocarcinogenesis. Therefore, we tried to inhibit the dedifferentiated hepatocyte fate by inhibiting the Notch signaling pathway after hepatocarcinogenesis. We found that inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway suppressed the expression of biliary duct marker genes in hepatocytes while suppressing Sox9 upregulation due to dedifferentiation. Similarly, the dedifferentiation of hepatocytes could be inhibited in sox9bfh313 mutants. Therefore, after hepatocarcinogenesis, inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway or sox9bfh313 mutant suppresses dedifferentiation of hepatocytes, allowing hepatocytes to maintain their hepatocyte fate (Figure S4). Inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway also resulted in reduced liver fibrosis after hepatocarcinogenesis, a decrease in the number of migrating hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and improved survival (Figure S4).
Higher expression of SOX9 promotes stemness and tumorigenesis in liver cancer stem cells and is also associated with poor survival [38]. Moreover, downregulation of SOX9 decreased the invasiveness and migration of HCC [49]. As a transcription factor, SOX9 acts as a pleiotropic factor by regulating several key signaling pathways in cancers, such as the Wnt/β-catenin, TGFβ/Smad, PI3K/AKT, and mTOR signaling pathways [38]. SOX9 has been shown to influence cancer progression through Wnt signaling [50]. The Wnt signaling pathway is a key signaling pathway that regulates hepatocyte differentiation, and SOX9’s overexpression activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling through enhanced phosphorylation of GSK3β, thereby enhancing the translocation of β-catenin from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and finally enhancing the transcriptional activity of TCF1/LEF1 [50]. In addition, highly expressed SOX9 promotes proliferation of basal cell carcinoma by directly transcriptionally regulating mTOR, which is a crossover pathway between hedgehog signaling and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways [51]. A study found that mTORC1 signaling controls liver regeneration by regulating the dedifferentiation of biliary epithelial cells [52]. Therefore, we speculate that, in this zebrafish liver cancer model, Sox9 may regulate hepatocyte dedifferentiation through the Wnt–mTOR signaling pathway. Novel specific SOX9 inhibitors or compounds that attenuate SOX9 expression in SOX9-driven tumors will be important for future personalized anticancer treatment strategies [53].
Previous studies found that Notch signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma promotes cell stemness and poor differentiation. Liver cancer stem cells originated from either hepatocytes dedifferentiation or differentiation arresting of liver normal stem cells. In a previous study, it was found that the inhibition of Notch promotes the differentiation of malignantly transformed hepatic progenitor cells [54]. We propose that, in our model, hepatocellular carcinoma stem cells arise mainly derived from hepatocyte dedifferentiation after hepatocarcinogenesis, rather than hepatocellular carcinoma stem cells self-replicating without differentiation. This is because our model is of hepatocellular carcinoma resulting from specific expression of oncogenes in mature hepatocytes in zebrafish, and previous studies used cell lines to conclude this [55]. Additionally, we observed that hepatocytes subsequently expressed hepatic progenitor cell markers after hepatocarcinogenesis. Considering the timing, hepatocyte dedifferentiation should be the main contribution of hepatic progenitor cells at this time. Of course, this does not exclude the contribution of hepatocellular carcinoma stem cells self-replicating without differentiation to them. The specific contribution of the two ways in hepatocarcinogenesis still needs to be further investigated. In summary, this study reveals the role of Notch in hepatocyte dedifferentiation through downregulation of Sox9 in krasG12V-induced hepatocellular carcinoma, providing a potential target for clinical studies of HCC. In addition, this model provides a powerful tool for further screening of differentiated therapeutic agents.
In conclusion, we found that hepatocyte dedifferentiation is closely associated with hepatocellular carcinoma progression after hepatocarcinogenesis, and inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway allows hepatocytes to maintain their hepatocyte fate. Whether the same findings hold in more heterogeneous hepatocellular carcinoma models needs to be further investigated. The specific mechanisms by which Notch specifically regulates hepatocyte dedifferentiation into hepatocellular carcinoma cells after hepatocarcinogenesis require further study. Further single-cell sequencing may make an essential contribution to unraveling this question.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Ethical Statement

All experimental protocols were approved by the Institute of Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Southwest University (Chongqing, China), and methods were performed according to approved guidelines. The zebrafish facility and studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Southwest University (Chongqing, China). Zebrafish were housed by the Guide for Laboratory Animal Welfare of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2006) and the protocols of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Southwest University (2007).

4.2. Zebrafish Lineage

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) AB strain-derived Tg(fabp10a:Dendra2-NTR)cq1 were used as control [29], for the induction of liver cancer by Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1)cq136 from AB strain injected with both pfabp10a:Tet3G and pTRE3G-BI:krasG12V-ZsGreen1. Plasmids were constructed, and Tg(Hsp70l:dnMAML-GFP) was used for inhibition of Notch signaling. These zebrafish lines were raised under standard conditions and embryos/larvae used for experiments were treated with 0.003% PTU (Sigma) starting from 24 hpf.

4.3. Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization

Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) was performed according to the previously described method [52]. The antisense probes for hhex, foxa3, sox9b, notch1a, notch1b, notch2, notch3, and her15 were used.

4.4. Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Coupled with Antibody Staining Assays

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) coupled with antibody staining assays was performed according to the previously described method [56,57]. The antisense probes for sox9b and cp were used.

4.5. Antibody Staining

Antibody staining was performed as previously described [58,59]. The following antibodies were used: antibody to Dendra2 (1:1000; AB821, Evrogen, Moscow, Russia), anti-CDH1 (1:1000; 610181, BD Biosciences), anti-Anxa4 (2F11) (1:1000; ab71826, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-SOX9 (1:500; A5080, Bimake), Anti-Collagen I (1:500; ab23730, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and anti-PCNA (1:1000; SAB2701819, Sigma).

4.6. Generation of Transgenic Lines for Induction Experiments

The fabp10a promoter was replaced into the modified pEF1a:Tet3G (Cat. 631342, Clontech) vector. The cDNA of full-length Zebrafish kras was amplified by PrimeSTAR HS DNA polymerase (Takara) and point mutated to obtain krasG12V, cloned into the modified pTRE3G-BI:ZsGreen1 (Cat.631342, Clontech) vector; and TRE3G-BI is a bidirectional version of TRE3G promoter that allows for simultaneous, equivalent, and inducible expression of two transgenes. Both plasmids were injected simultaneously with I-SceI enzyme into AB strain embryos to generate transgenic line Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G-BI:krasG12V-BI-ZsGreen1)cq136 (referred to as Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1)cq136) as previously described [59,60]. Positive embryos showed expression of Cerulean in the eyes of the offspring.

4.7. DOX Treatment and Heat Shock

DOX (doxycycline, A600889, Sangon) at a final concentration of 40μg/mL was added to egg water at 5 dpf for activation of the Tet-On system and controls without DOX. To induce dnMAML-GFP overexpression in Tg(Hsp70l:dnMAML-GFP), larvae were placed in egg water and then incubated in a 38.5 °C water bath for 30 min from 5 dpf to 10 dpf, once a day.

4.8. Paraffin Sectioning and Staining

Paraformaldehyde-fixed livers were embedded in paraffin. Sections (7 μm) were stained using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to examine cell and tissue morphology as previously described [29]. Sections (7 μm) were stained using Sirius Red (BP-DL030, Sbjbio life sciences, Nanjing) staining to detect tissue fibrosis morphology, as previously described [61]. To maintain uniformity between samples, images taken at multiple depths from 1.0 mm to 3.0 mm were used as a reference between liver sections to determine the depth of sections.

4.9. Percent Fibrosis Statistics

All H&E staining and Sirius Red staining were separated the eosin staining and Sirius Red staining by the color deconvolution plugin in of ImageJ software and calculating the area. Fibrosis calculations of H&E staining and Sirius Red staining were performed according to previous reports [62,63].

4.10. Data Collection and Analysis

All images were taken on a SteREO DiscoveryV20 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany), a Zeiss Axio Image Z1 (Carl Zeiss), and an LSM780 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss). The intensities and areas of the fluorescence images were measured using ImageJ. All figures, labels, arrows, scale bars, and outlines were drawn using the Adobe Photoshop software. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 8. Statistical significance was determined using the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. p values for survival curves were calculated by log-rank test. The changes of each data point are expressed as mean ± S.D.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23094705/s1.

Author Contributions

J.M. and J.S. designed the experimental strategy, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. Q.C. performed the paraffin sectioning and staining analyzed the data. J.S. performed all the other experiments. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talent Support of Chongqing (Grant CQBX201906).

Institutional Review Board Statement

No human materials were used in this study. All animals were housed in a temperature- and light-controlled facilities and were maintained in accordance with the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Animal Welfare Act. Experiments were performed with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Southwest University.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Lingfei Luo for guidance and assistance. We would like to thank Kai Gang and Jinzi Chen for the experimental discussion, and Pengcheng Cai and Jianbo He for providing advice on manuscript writing. We thank Feng Liu for providing Tg(Hsp70l:dnMAML-GFP) transgenic strain.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with the contents of this article.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, C.Y.; Chen, K.F.; Chen, P.J. Treatment of Liver Cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a021535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sia, D.; Villanueva, A.; Friedman, S.L.; Llovet, J.M. Liver Cancer Cell of Origin, Molecular Class, and Effects on Patient Prognosis. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 745–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Chen, Y.; Wong, P.P.; Sjeklocha, L.; Steer, C.J.; Sahin, M.B. Mature hepatocytes exhibit unexpected plasticity by direct dedifferentiation into liver progenitor cells in culture. Hepatology 2012, 55, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Tarlow, B.D.; Pelz, C.; Naugler, W.E.; Wakefield, L.; Wilson, E.M.; Finegold, M.J.; Grompe, M. Bipotential adult liver progenitors are derived from chronically injured mature hepatocytes. Cell Stem Cell. 2014, 15, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Guerrini, G.P.; Pinelli, D.; Di Benedetto, F.; Marini, E.; Corno, V.; Guizzetti, M.; Aluffi, A.; Zambelli, M.; Fagiuoli, S.; Luca, M.G.; et al. Predictive value of nodule size and differentiation in HCC recurrence after liver transplantation. Surg. Oncol. 2016, 25, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cruz, F.D.; Matushansky, I. Solid tumor differentiation therapy-is it possible? Oncotarget 2012, 3, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Jin, X.; Jin, X.; Kim, H. Cancer stem cells and differentiation therapy. Tumour Biol. 2017, 39, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Geisler, F.; Nagl, F.; Mazur, P.K.; Lee, M.; Zimber-Strobl, U.; Strobl, L.J.; Radtke, F.; Schmid, R.M.; Siveke, J.T. Liver-specific inactivation of Notch2, but not Notch1, compromises intrahepatic bile duct development in mice. Hepatology 2008, 48, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gil-Garcia, B.; Baladron, V. The complex role of NOTCH receptors and their ligands in the development of hepatoblastoma, cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Biol. Cell 2016, 108, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bray, S.J. Notch signalling in context. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 17, 722–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Aster, J.C.; Pear, W.S.; Blacklow, S.C. The Varied Roles of Notch in Cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2017, 12, 245–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Huang, Q.; Li, J.; Zheng, J.; Wei, A. The Carcinogenic Role of the Notch Signaling Pathway in the Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. Cancer 2019, 10, 1570–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Qi, R.; An, H.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Liu, S.; Xu, H.; Guo, Z.; Cheng, T.; Cao, X. Notch1 signaling inhibits growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma through induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 8323–8329. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Viatour, P.; Ehmer, U.; Saddic, L.A.; Dorrell, C.; Andersen, J.B.; Lin, C.; Zmoos, A.F.; Mazur, P.K.; Schaffer, B.E.; Ostermeier, A.; et al. Notch signaling inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma following inactivation of the RB pathway. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 1963–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Villanueva, A.; Alsinet, C.; Yanger, K.; Hoshida, Y.; Zong, Y.; Toffanin, S.; Rodriguez-Carunchio, L.; Sole, M.; Thung, S.; Stanger, B.Z.; et al. Notch signaling is activated in human hepatocellular carcinoma and induces tumor formation in mice. Gastroenterology 2012, 143, 1660–1669.e1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Dill, M.T.; Tornillo, L.; Fritzius, T.; Terracciano, L.; Semela, D.; Bettler, B.; Heim, M.H.; Tchorz, J.S. Constitutive Notch2 signaling induces hepatic tumors in mice. Hepatology 2013, 57, 1607–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, C.; Ho, Y.J.; Salomao, M.A.; Dapito, D.H.; Bartolome, A.; Schwabe, R.F.; Lee, J.S.; Lowe, S.W.; Pajvani, U.B. Notch activity characterizes a common hepatocellular carcinoma subtype with unique molecular and clinicopathologic features. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sekiya, S.; Suzuki, A. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma can arise from Notch-mediated conversion of hepatocytes. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 3914–3918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, J.; Dong, M.; Xu, Z.; Song, X.; Zhang, S.; Qiao, Y.; Che, L.; Gordan, J.; Hu, K.; Liu, Y.; et al. Notch2 controls hepatocyte-derived cholangiocarcinoma formation in mice. Oncogene 2018, 37, 3229–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nakano, Y.; Nakao, S.; Sueoka, M.; Kasahara, D.; Tanno, Y.; Sumiyoshi, H.; Itoh, T.; Miyajima, A.; Hozumi, K.; Inagaki, Y. Two distinct Notch signals, Delta-like 4/Notch1 and Jagged-1/Notch2, antagonistically regulate chemical hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Brown, Z.J.; Heinrich, B.; Greten, T.F. Mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma: An overview and highlights for immunotherapy research. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 15, 536–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wrighton, P.J.; Oderberg, I.M.; Goessling, W. There Is Something Fishy About Liver Cancer: Zebrafish Models of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 8, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Das, A.T.; Tenenbaum, L.; Berkhout, B. Tet-On Systems For Doxycycline-inducible Gene Expression. Curr. Gene Ther. 2016, 16, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Nguyen, A.T.; Emelyanov, A.; Koh, C.H.; Spitsbergen, J.M.; Parinov, S.; Gong, Z. An inducible kras(V12) transgenic zebrafish model for liver tumorigenesis and chemical drug screening. Dis. Model. Mech. 2012, 5, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Fan, X.; Petitt, M.; Gamboa, M.; Huang, M.; Dhal, S.; Druzin, M.L.; Wu, J.C.; Chen-Tsai, Y.; Nayak, N.R. Transient, inducible, placenta-specific gene expression in mice. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 5637–5644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Reboredo, M.; Kramer, M.G.; Smerdou, C.; Prieto, J.; De Las Rivas, J. Transcriptomic effects of Tet-on and mifepristone-inducible systems in mouse liver. Hum. Gene Ther. 2008, 19, 1233–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Seelinger, M.; Otterlei, M. Helicase-Like Transcription Factor HLTF and E3 Ubiquitin Ligase SHPRH Confer DNA Damage Tolerance through Direct Interactions with Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. He, J.; Lu, H.; Zou, Q.; Luo, L. Regeneration of liver after extreme hepatocyte loss occurs mainly via biliary transdifferentiation in zebrafish. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 789–800.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pastushenko, I.; Blanpain, C. EMT Transition States during Tumor Progression and Metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2019, 29, 212–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhang, D.; Golubkov, V.S.; Han, W.; Correa, R.G.; Zhou, Y.; Lee, S.; Strongin, A.Y.; Dong, P.D. Identification of Annexin A4 as a hepatopancreas factor involved in liver cell survival. Dev. Biol. 2014, 395, 96–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Duan, J.L.; Ruan, B.; Yan, X.C.; Liang, L.; Song, P.; Yang, Z.Y.; Liu, Y.; Dou, K.F.; Han, H.; Wang, L. Endothelial Notch activation reshapes the angiocrine of sinusoidal endothelia to aggravate liver fibrosis and blunt regeneration in mice. Hepatology 2018, 68, 677–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Duan, J.L.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Ruan, B.; Fang, Z.Q.; Ding, J.; Liu, J.J.; Song, P.; Xu, H.; Xu, C.; Yue, Z.S.; et al. Notch-Regulated c-Kit Positive Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells Contribute to Liver Zonation and Regeneration. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, in press. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Weng, A.P.; Nam, Y.; Wolfe, M.S.; Pear, W.S.; Griffin, J.D.; Blacklow, S.C.; Aster, J.C. Growth suppression of pre-T acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells by inhibition of notch signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zhao, L.; Borikova, A.L.; Ben-Yair, R.; Guner-Ataman, B.; MacRae, C.A.; Lee, R.T.; Burns, C.G.; Burns, C.E. Notch signaling regulates cardiomyocyte proliferation during zebrafish heart regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 1403–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Chen, J.; Li, X.; Ni, R.; Chen, Q.; Yang, Q.; He, J.; Luo, L. Acute brain vascular regeneration occurs via lymphatic transdifferentiation. Dev. Cell 2021, 56, 3115–3127.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tanimizu, N.; Nishikawa, Y.; Ichinohe, N.; Akiyama, H.; Mitaka, T. Sry HMG box protein 9-positive (Sox9+) epithelial cell adhesion molecule-negative (EpCAM-) biphenotypic cells derived from hepatocytes are involved in mouse liver regeneration. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 7589–7598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Panda, M.; Tripathi, S.K.; Biswal, B.K. SOX9: An emerging driving factor from cancer progression to drug resistance. Biochim. Biophys Acta Rev. Cancer 2021, 1875, 188517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Song, S.; Maru, D.M.; Ajani, J.A.; Chan, C.H.; Honjo, S.; Lin, H.K.; Correa, A.; Hofstetter, W.L.; Davila, M.; Stroehlein, J.; et al. Loss of TGF-beta adaptor beta2SP activates notch signaling and SOX9 expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 2159–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Delous, M.; Yin, C.; Shin, D.; Ninov, N.; Debrito Carten, J.; Pan, L.; Ma, T.P.; Farber, S.A.; Moens, C.B.; Stainier, D.Y. Sox9b is a key regulator of pancreaticobiliary ductal system development. PLoS Genet 2012, 8, e1002754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Calderaro, J.; Ziol, M.; Paradis, V.; Zucman-Rossi, J. Molecular and histological correlations in liver cancer. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 616–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Wu, B.; Sodji, Q.H.; Oyelere, A.K. Inflammation, Fibrosis and Cancer: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Options and Challenges. Cancers 2022, 14, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wynn, T.A.; Ramalingam, T.R. Mechanisms of fibrosis: Therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1028–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Villanueva, A. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1450–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. de Thé, H. Differentiation therapy revisited. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018, 18, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chao, J.; Zhao, S.; Sun, H. Dedifferentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2020, 12, 2099–2109. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhou, T.; Li, S.; Xiang, D.; Liu, J.; Sun, W.; Cui, X.; Ning, B.; Li, X.; Cheng, Z.; Jiang, W.; et al. m6A RNA methylation-mediated HNF3gamma reduction renders hepatocellular carcinoma dedifferentiation and sorafenib resistance. Signal Transduct. Target.Ther. 2020, 5, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Risom, T.; Langer, E.M.; Chapman, M.P.; Rantala, J.; Fields, A.J.; Boniface, C.; Alvarez, M.J.; Kendsersky, N.D.; Pelz, C.R.; Johnson-Camacho, K.; et al. Differentiation-state plasticity is a targetable resistance mechanism in basal-like breast cancer. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Aguilar-Medina, M.; Avendano-Felix, M.; Lizarraga-Verdugo, E.; Bermudez, M.; Romero-Quintana, J.G.; Ramos-Payan, R.; Ruiz-Garcia, E.; Lopez-Camarillo, C. SOX9 Stem-Cell Factor: Clinical and Functional Relevance in Cancer. J. Oncol. 2019, 2019, 6754040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Liu, H.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, B.; Peng, R.; Ma, Z.; Lu, J. SOX9 Overexpression Promotes Glioma Metastasis via Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2015, 73, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kim, A.L.; Back, J.H.; Chaudhary, S.C.; Zhu, Y.; Athar, M.; Bickers, D.R. SOX9 Transcriptionally Regulates mTOR-Induced Proliferation of Basal Cell Carcinomas. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2018, 138, 1716–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. He, J.; Chen, J.; Wei, X.; Leng, H.; Mu, H.; Cai, P.; Luo, L. Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 Signaling Is Required for the Dedifferentiation From Biliary Cell to Bipotential Progenitor Cell in Zebrafish Liver Regeneration. Hepatology 2019, 70, 2092–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Grimm, D.; Bauer, J.; Wise, P.; Kruger, M.; Simonsen, U.; Wehland, M.; Infanger, M.; Corydon, T.J. The role of SOX family members in solid tumours and metastasis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2020, 67, 122–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Majumder, S.; Crabtree, J.S.; Golde, T.E.; Minter, L.M.; Osborne, B.A.; Miele, L. Targeting Notch in oncology: The path forward. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 125–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fang, S.; Liu, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, F.F.; Li, Y.; Yan, Q.; Cui, Y.Z.; Zhu, Y.H.; Yuan, Y.F.; Guan, X.Y. Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1 promotes stemness and poor differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma by directly activating the NOTCH pathway. Oncogene 2019, 38, 4061–4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. He, J.; Mo, D.; Chen, J.; Luo, L. Combined whole-mount fluorescence in situ hybridization and antibody staining in zebrafish embryos and larvae. Nat. Protoc. 2020, 15, 3361–3379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yang, Y.; Wang, H.; He, J.; Shi, W.; Jiang, Z.; Gao, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ni, R.; Yang, Q.; Luo, L. A single-cell-resolution fate map of endoderm reveals demarcation of pancreatic progenitors by cell cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2025793118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chen, J.; He, J.; Ni, R.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, L. Cerebrovascular Injuries Induce Lymphatic Invasion into Brain Parenchyma to Guide Vascular Regeneration in Zebrafish. Dev. Cell 2019, 49, 697–710.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, C.; Wu, C.; Yang, Q.; Gao, J.; Li, L.; Yang, D.; Luo, L. Macrophages Mediate the Repair of Brain Vascular Rupture through Direct Physical Adhesion and Mechanical Traction. Immunity 2016, 44, 1162–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Lu, H.; Ma, J.; Yang, Y.; Shi, W.; Luo, L. EpCAM is an endoderm-specific Wnt derepressor that licenses hepatic development. Dev. Cell 2013, 24, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Cai, P.; Mao, X.; Zhao, J.; Nie, L.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Ni, R.; He, J.; Luo, L. Farnesoid X Receptor is Required for the Redifferentiation of Bi-potential Progenitor Cells during Biliary-Mediated Zebrafish Liver Regeneration. Hepatology 2021, 74, 3345–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. van Putten, M.; de Winter, C.; van Roon-Mom, W.; van Ommen, G.J.; AC’t Hoen, P.; Aartsma-Rus, A. A 3 months mild functional test regime does not affect disease parameters in young mdx mice. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2010, 20, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Rangan, G.K.; Tesch, G.H. Quantification of renal pathology by image analysis. Nephrology 2007, 12, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 04705 g001 550
Figure 1. Induction of krasG12V overexpression in zebrafish liver cancer by Tet-On system. (A) Components of the Tet-On system and doxycycline (DOX) treatment strategy for induction of liver cancer. (B) Confocal images showed zebrafish liver after DOX activation of krasG12V from 6 days postfertilization (dpf) to 10 dpf. (C,D) antibody staining results of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in the control group (n = 11) and krasG12V+ group (n = 13). (E) Confocal images showed the presence of a green, fluorescent signal in the intestine outside the liver after DOX activation of krasG12V. (F) H&E staining to confirm the morphology of the liver in the control and krasG12V+ groups. (G) Statistics of the percentage fibrosis/necrosis area in the liver in the control (n = 5) and krasG12V+ (n = 4) groups. (H) Sirius Red staining of the liver in the control and krasG12V+ groups. (I) Statistics of the percentage fibrosis area in the liver in the control (n = 5) and krasG12V+ (n = 5) groups. Numbers indicate the percentage of larvae exhibiting this expression. Asterisks show significance: *—p < 0.05; ***—p < 0.001; ****—p < 0.0001. Scale bars—100 μm; error bars—S.D.
Figure 1. Induction of krasG12V overexpression in zebrafish liver cancer by Tet-On system. (A) Components of the Tet-On system and doxycycline (DOX) treatment strategy for induction of liver cancer. (B) Confocal images showed zebrafish liver after DOX activation of krasG12V from 6 days postfertilization (dpf) to 10 dpf. (C,D) antibody staining results of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in the control group (n = 11) and krasG12V+ group (n = 13). (E) Confocal images showed the presence of a green, fluorescent signal in the intestine outside the liver after DOX activation of krasG12V. (F) H&E staining to confirm the morphology of the liver in the control and krasG12V+ groups. (G) Statistics of the percentage fibrosis/necrosis area in the liver in the control (n = 5) and krasG12V+ (n = 4) groups. (H) Sirius Red staining of the liver in the control and krasG12V+ groups. (I) Statistics of the percentage fibrosis area in the liver in the control (n = 5) and krasG12V+ (n = 5) groups. Numbers indicate the percentage of larvae exhibiting this expression. Asterisks show significance: *—p < 0.05; ***—p < 0.001; ****—p < 0.0001. Scale bars—100 μm; error bars—S.D.
Ijms 23 04705 g001
Ijms 23 04705 g002 550
Figure 2. Zebrafish hepatocytes undergo dedifferentiation and biliary duct activation after krasG12V induction. (A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) results showed the expression pattern of sox9b, hhex, and foxa3 at 6 dpf, 8 dpf, and 10 dpf, respectively, after DOX activation of krasG12V. (B,C) Antibody staining of biliary duct marker Anxa4 in zebrafish liver expression at 6 dpf, 8 dpf, and 10 dpf after DOX induction, and statistics of Anxa4+ area in the liver in the control (n = 10) and krasG12V+ (n = 11) groups. Numbers indicate the percentage of larvae exhibiting this expression. Asterisks show significance: *—p < 0.05; ***—p < 0.001; ****—p < 0.0001. Scale bars—100 μm; error bars—S.D.
Figure 2. Zebrafish hepatocytes undergo dedifferentiation and biliary duct activation after krasG12V induction. (A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) results showed the expression pattern of sox9b, hhex, and foxa3 at 6 dpf, 8 dpf, and 10 dpf, respectively, after DOX activation of krasG12V. (B,C) Antibody staining of biliary duct marker Anxa4 in zebrafish liver expression at 6 dpf, 8 dpf, and 10 dpf after DOX induction, and statistics of Anxa4+ area in the liver in the control (n = 10) and krasG12V+ (n = 11) groups. Numbers indicate the percentage of larvae exhibiting this expression. Asterisks show significance: *—p < 0.05; ***—p < 0.001; ****—p < 0.0001. Scale bars—100 μm; error bars—S.D.
Ijms 23 04705 g002
Ijms 23 04705 g003 550
Figure 3. The Notch signaling pathway was upregulated after hepatocellular carcinoma induction, and the inhibition of Notch signaling suppressed hepatocyte dedifferentiation. (A) WISH results showed the expression pattern of notch1a, notch1b, notch2, notch3, and her15 at 10 dpf after DOX activation of krasG12V. (B) Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1) with Tg(Hsp70l:dnMAML-GFP) double transgenic fish line treatment strategy. (C) Monolayer images of Anxa4 antibody staining showed expression changes in the DOX-induced krasG12V+ and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ groups at 8 dpf and 10 dpf. (D) Statistics of Anxa4 + and ZsGreen1 + /ZsGreen1+ ratio in the DOX-induced krasG12V+ (n = 11) and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ (n = 13) groups at 8 dpf and 10 dpf. (E) The results of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) showed sox9b expression in the DOX-induced control and krasG12V+ and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ groups at 10 dpf. (F) The results of FISH showed cp expression in the DOX-induced control, krasG12V+ and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ groups at 10 dpf. Numbers indicate the proportion of larvae exhibiting that expression. Asterisks show significance: ****—p < 0.0001. Scale bars—100 μm; error bars—S.D.
Figure 3. The Notch signaling pathway was upregulated after hepatocellular carcinoma induction, and the inhibition of Notch signaling suppressed hepatocyte dedifferentiation. (A) WISH results showed the expression pattern of notch1a, notch1b, notch2, notch3, and her15 at 10 dpf after DOX activation of krasG12V. (B) Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1) with Tg(Hsp70l:dnMAML-GFP) double transgenic fish line treatment strategy. (C) Monolayer images of Anxa4 antibody staining showed expression changes in the DOX-induced krasG12V+ and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ groups at 8 dpf and 10 dpf. (D) Statistics of Anxa4 + and ZsGreen1 + /ZsGreen1+ ratio in the DOX-induced krasG12V+ (n = 11) and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ (n = 13) groups at 8 dpf and 10 dpf. (E) The results of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) showed sox9b expression in the DOX-induced control and krasG12V+ and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ groups at 10 dpf. (F) The results of FISH showed cp expression in the DOX-induced control, krasG12V+ and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ groups at 10 dpf. Numbers indicate the proportion of larvae exhibiting that expression. Asterisks show significance: ****—p < 0.0001. Scale bars—100 μm; error bars—S.D.
Ijms 23 04705 g003
Ijms 23 04705 g004 550
Figure 4. Hepatic Sox9 expression is upregulated after hepatocellular carcinoma induction, and the sox9bfh313 mutant suppressed hepatocyte dedifferentiation. (A) Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1) with Tg(Hsp70l:dnMAML-GFP) double transgenic fish line treatment strategy. (B,C) Sox9 antibody staining indicated the number of Sox9+ cells in the liver at 10 dpf in the DOX-induced control (n = 5), krasG12V+ (n = 5) and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ (n = 5) groups with statistical results. (D) Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1) treatment strategy in sox9bfh313 mutant. (E) Three-dimensional images of Anxa4 antibody staining showed biliary duct changes in the DOX-induced krasG12V+ and krasG12V+ sox9bfh313 mutants at 8 dpf and 10 dpf. (F) Monolayer images of Anxa4 antibody staining biliary duct changes in the DOX-induced krasG12V+ and krasG12V+ sox9bfh313 mutant at 8 dpf and 10 dpf. Asterisks show significance: *—p < 0.05; **—p < 0.01. Scale bars—100 μm; error bars—S.D.
Figure 4. Hepatic Sox9 expression is upregulated after hepatocellular carcinoma induction, and the sox9bfh313 mutant suppressed hepatocyte dedifferentiation. (A) Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1) with Tg(Hsp70l:dnMAML-GFP) double transgenic fish line treatment strategy. (B,C) Sox9 antibody staining indicated the number of Sox9+ cells in the liver at 10 dpf in the DOX-induced control (n = 5), krasG12V+ (n = 5) and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ (n = 5) groups with statistical results. (D) Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V-ZsGreen1) treatment strategy in sox9bfh313 mutant. (E) Three-dimensional images of Anxa4 antibody staining showed biliary duct changes in the DOX-induced krasG12V+ and krasG12V+ sox9bfh313 mutants at 8 dpf and 10 dpf. (F) Monolayer images of Anxa4 antibody staining biliary duct changes in the DOX-induced krasG12V+ and krasG12V+ sox9bfh313 mutant at 8 dpf and 10 dpf. Asterisks show significance: *—p < 0.05; **—p < 0.01. Scale bars—100 μm; error bars—S.D.
Ijms 23 04705 g004
Ijms 23 04705 g005 550
Figure 5. Inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway after liver cancer induction reduced cancer cell migration and improved survival. (A) Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V -ZsGreen1) with Tg(Hsp70l:dnMAML-GFP) double transgenic fish line treatment strategy to observe the migration of cancer cells. (B) Zebrafish larvae were classified into three classes, I, II, and III, by the number of cancer cells outside the liver and the number of locations of metastases. (C) The proportion of the total number of larvae in different metastasis classes in the krasG12V+ (n = 46) and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ (n = 130) groups at 9 dpf. (D) Kaplan–Meier survival curves of the DOX-induced krasG12V+ (n = 191) and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ (n = 163) groups. p values for survival curves were calculated by log-rank test. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Figure 5. Inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway after liver cancer induction reduced cancer cell migration and improved survival. (A) Tg(fabp10a:Tet3G;TRE3G:krasG12V -ZsGreen1) with Tg(Hsp70l:dnMAML-GFP) double transgenic fish line treatment strategy to observe the migration of cancer cells. (B) Zebrafish larvae were classified into three classes, I, II, and III, by the number of cancer cells outside the liver and the number of locations of metastases. (C) The proportion of the total number of larvae in different metastasis classes in the krasG12V+ (n = 46) and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ (n = 130) groups at 9 dpf. (D) Kaplan–Meier survival curves of the DOX-induced krasG12V+ (n = 191) and krasG12V+ and dnMAML+ (n = 163) groups. p values for survival curves were calculated by log-rank test. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Ijms 23 04705 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, J.; Chen, Q.; Ma, J. Notch–Sox9 Axis Mediates Hepatocyte Dedifferentiation in KrasG12V-Induced Zebrafish Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4705. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094705

AMA Style

Sun J, Chen Q, Ma J. Notch–Sox9 Axis Mediates Hepatocyte Dedifferentiation in KrasG12V-Induced Zebrafish Hepatocellular Carcinoma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(9):4705. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094705

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Junhui, Qi Chen, and Jianlong Ma. 2022. "Notch–Sox9 Axis Mediates Hepatocyte Dedifferentiation in KrasG12V-Induced Zebrafish Hepatocellular Carcinoma" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 9: 4705. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094705

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop