Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Heat Selection of the Coral Endosymbiont Cladocopium C1acro (Symbiodiniaceae) Stabilizes Associated Bacterial Communities
Previous Article in Journal
Modulation of Mismatch Repair and the SOCS1/p53 Axis by microRNA-155 in the Colon of Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Link between Activities of Hepatic 11beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase-1 and Monoamine Oxidase-A in the Brain Following Repeated Predator Stress: Focus on Heightened Anxiety
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Impact of Prenatal and Postnatal Exposure to Endocrine Disrupter DDT on Adrenal Medulla Function

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(9), 4912; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094912
by Nataliya V. Yaglova 1,*, Sergey S. Obernikhin 1, Dibakhan A. Tsomartova 1,2, Valentin V. Yaglov 1, Svetlana V. Nazimova 1, Elina S. Tsomartova 1,2, Ekaterina P. Timokhina 1, Elizaveta V. Chereshneva 2, Marina Y. Ivanova 2 and Tatiana A. Lomanovskaya 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(9), 4912; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094912
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 27 April 2022 / Accepted: 27 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Steroids and Lipophilic Hormones, and Their Actions 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In the current manuscript authors approached for the first time the investigation of potential damaging effects of prenatal (vs post natal) exposure to DDT on adrenal medulla development and function. The results of the study are original and relevant for those involved in developmental and environmental branches of medicine, as well as to many broader areas of research. The study is very well conceived although simple in design but provides strong evidence of a detrimental effects of DDT with poor adaptation later in life. Results are adequately presented and supported by proper discussion of available literature and explanation of potentially involved mechanisms and wider implications.

Author Response

We are very grateful for all your comments and attention to the manuscript! 

Reviewer 2 Report

The work is good, interesting, and deserves publication.

Minor points can be improved. Epinephrine is shortly described, and its role. Develop in a few sentences.

In the abstract, give amounts of reduction, examples for decrease (%), like in the results. Please add also in abstract and discussion details on the hypothetic mechanism of action, direct or indirect, and why. Add in abstract the dysmorphogenetic action. Explain in discussion better. What other experiments are needed? You underline that low levels od DDT are used. PLease compare that to the environmental levels. This appears very important. Line 357, it is Bouin and not Bouen.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop