Next Article in Journal
A Skeletal Muscle-Centric View on Time-Restricted Feeding and Obesity under Various Metabolic Challenges in Humans and Animals
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification of Novel Pathways Regulated by APE1/Ref-1 in Human Retinal Endothelial Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Multifaceted Benefits of GDF11 Treatment in Spinal Cord Injury: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of B-NIPOx in Experimental Trypanosoma cruzi Infection in Mice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms24010417
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential Development of Vitrified Immature Human Oocytes: Influence of the Culture Medium and the Timing of Vitrification

by
Irene Peinado
1,*,
Isabel Moya
1,
Laura García-Valverde
1,2,
Raquel Francés
1,3,
Rosana Ribes
1,
Patrocinio Polo
1,
María José Gómez-Torres
2,4,* and
Ana Monzó
1
1
Assisted Human Reproduction, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain
2
Biotechnology Department, Alicante University, 03690 Alicante, Spain
3
Energy and Memory, Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France
4
Cátedra Human Fertility, Alicante University, 03690 Alicante, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1), 417; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010417
Submission received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 24 December 2022 / Published: 27 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 25th Anniversary of IJMS: Advances in Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
How does the in vitro maturation (IVM) medium and the vitrification procedure affect the survival of germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes obtained from stimulated cycles and their development to the blastocyst stage? In total, 1085 GV human oocytes were obtained after women underwent a cycle of controlled ovarian stimulation, and these oocytes were subjected to IVM before or after their vitrification. IVM was carried out in two commercial culture media not specifically designed for maturation. MII oocytes were then activated and embryo development until day 6 was evaluated. According to the results, a higher percentage of oocytes reach the MII stage if they are vitrified before they undergo IVM. Nevertheless, the medium used and the sample size determine whether these differences become significant or not. Similar survival rates and development to blastocysts were observed in all the conditions studied.

1. Introduction

The proper combination of two assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs), specifically oocyte vitrification (OV) and in vitro maturation (IVM), represents an interesting strategy and improvements to these approaches may enhance their output.
In recent years, many children have been born from vitrified [1,2,3,4], IVM [5,6,7,8,9,10], or IVM and vitrified oocytes [11,12]. While OV is considered to be a consolidated technique that produces good results in ART laboratories, IVM still presents deficient and poorly reproducible results, a procedure that remains in an experimental phase.
OV is associated with high survival rates (SRs), both when oocytes are vitrified at the germinal vesicle (GV) or metaphase II (MII) stage [13,14,15,16]. Nevertheless, the maturation, fertilization, and development rates of GV after OV remains controversial [17,18,19]. In theory, the DNA of GV should be more resistant to cryodamage as it is highly compact at this meiotic state and protected by the nuclear membrane.
The clinical implementation of IVM has progressed slowly due to technical problems associated with this procedure and one of the main stumbling blocks has been the choice of an adequate culture medium (CM) for maturation. Different media for oocyte maturation have been studied over the years, such as human tubal fluid (HTF [20]), cell culture medium (199, IVF [21,22]), medium for the culture to blastocyst [6,22,23,24], or specific commercial media for IVM [9]. Maturation rates have improved over time and although some of these culture media have achieved good maturation rates, the results have not been sufficiently reproducible to establish them as the reference medium of choice for IVM.
Recent studies in this field have focused on improving maturation rates and on defining the best meiotic stage for OV. The quality of the mature oocytes obtained after the combination of these ARTs was evaluated by analyzing them by electron microscopy [25,26], confocal microscopy [27,28,29], epigenetics [30,31,32,33], or through their subsequent embryonic development [6,23].
Therefore, it is clearly important to develop and optimize a protocol that achieves the best vitrification/maturation of GV, which will greatly improve the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. As such, in this study, oocyte survival and embryonic development was evaluated as a means to assess the efficiency of IVM before or after vitrification of human immature oocytes in two different culture media: (1) gamete and early-stage embryo culture medium; and (2) embryo to blastocyst culture medium. The goal was to establish a protocol in which both these events were optimized so as to enhance the efficiency of IVF procedures.
Our results showed comparable vitrification survival and blastocyst development rates regardless of the medium used or the maturation stage of the oocytes. However, this study exhibited higher maturation rates whether oocytes were cryopreserved before IVM and/or when they were cultivated in the commercial supplemented maturation medium (human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) + synthetic serum substitute (SSS)) designed to reach the blastocyst stage.

2. Results

2.1. Survival Rate (SR)

The previous maturation state of the oocytes did neither significantly influence the SR of the oocytes after warming (GV-Vit 84.3% (419/497), MII-Vit 85.7% (234/273)), nor was the SR influenced by the specific medium used for maturation [CM1 86.7% (98/113), CM2 85.0% (136/160)].
The comparison of the effect of the IVM medium on SR was only assessed for MII-Vit oocytes, as these were the only ones that may have seen their SR affected by the distinct maturation media used after vitrification.

2.2. Maturation Rate (MR)

The MR was used to assess whether prior vitrification of the oocytes affected this IVM process and we found that a significantly higher proportion of the warmed oocytes resumed meiosis (GVBD) than the fresh oocytes (GV vitrified 83.7% (349/417), GV fresh 73.0% (374/512); p < 0.0001). This was also witnessed when the MR was evaluated after 24 h (GV vitrified 59.2% (247/417), GV fresh 49.6% (254/512); p = 0.006) and 48 h in culture (GV vitrified 74.3% (310/417), GV fresh 62.7% (321/512); p < 0.0001: Table 1).
The IVM medium appeared to influence the MR, with higher values always evident in vitrified oocytes, although significant differences were only evident in the GVBD (GV vitrified 89.6% (240/268), GV fresh 78.2% (229/293); p < 0.0001), and the IVM 48 h (GV vitrified 82.5% (221/268); GV fresh 74.1% (217/293), p = 0.016) when the oocytes were cultured in CM2 medium (Table 2).
Overall, the percentage of oocytes that matured during the first 24 h was 54.93% (552/1005), which increased by 13.33% (134/1005) after 48 h to give a final proportion of 68.26% (686/1005) of oocytes that matured.

2.3. Activation Rate (AR)

The AR neither presented significant differences between the different groups studied (GV-Vit 46.9% (113/241), MII-Vit 53.7% (95/177), and Not-Vit 36.0% (9/25)), nor by the maturation medium used (CM1 53.6% (74/138) vs. CM2 46.9% (143/305)). However, the point of vitrification did appear to significantly affect the AR when the oocytes were matured in CM2 medium (MII-Vit 56.7% (59/104), GV-Vit 42.6% (75/176), Not-Vit 36.0% (9/25), p = 0.0026 and 0.0037), indicating that vitrification at the MII stage favors subsequent activation in this medium (Table 3 and Table 4).

2.4. Development Rate

The CRs were not significantly different between the three experimental groups, regardless of the culture medium used (GV-Vit 72.6% (82/113), MII-Vit 78.9% (75/95), and Not-Vit 77.8% (7/9)). Moreover, no significant differences were seen when we evaluated the average CN of the embryo on day 3 (Not-Vit 5.11 ± 2.892, GV-Vit 4.30 ± 2.741, and MII-Vit 4.89 ± 2.930). Taking into account the culture medium used and the group studied, we found that the CR after 48 h in culture in CM1 was significantly lower in oocytes that were vitrified at GV (60.5% (23/38)), as opposed to MII (88.9% (32/36), p = 0.007) (Table 3). However, no significant differences were observed between the groups when we evaluated the average CN in the embryos three days after activation (GV-Vit 3.97 ± 3.080, MII-Vit 4.47 ± 2.559). By contrast, in CM2, neither the CR (GV-Vit 78.7% (59/75), MII-Vit 72.9% (43/59), Not-Vit 77.8% (7/9)) (Table 4) nor the average CN of the embryo three days after activation (GV-Vit 4.30 ± 2.741, MII-Vit 4.89 ± 2.930, and Not-Vit 5.11 ± 2.892) were significantly different between the three groups.
Finally, there were no differences in the BR between the groups studied (GV-Vit 7.1% (8/113), MII-Vit 4.2% (4/95), and Not-Vit 77.8% (7/9)), and no significant differences were found in relation to the maturation media used (Table 3 and Table 4): CM1 (GV-Vit 7.9% (3/38) vs. MII-Vit 2.8% (1/36)); CM2 (GV-Vit 6.7% (5/75), MII-Vit 5.1% (3/59), Not-Vit 11.1% (1/9)).

3. Discussion

In this study, we focused on the effects of the timing of vitrification and of a specific IVM culture medium on the health and development of oocytes to be used in IVF procedures. Significantly higher MRs are obtained after 24 h and 48 h from vitrified GVs, as opposed to fresh oocytes, with significantly improved nuclear envelope breakdown again in vitrified oocytes. Conversely, and in terms of the stage of maturation at which the oocytes were vitrified (GV or MII), similar SRs and BRs were obtained, indicating that vitrification of GVs and their subsequent maturation seems a valid strategy to maximize the success of IVF/ICSI cycles.
Our SRs are similar to the those obtained elsewhere [14,34] and as with both groups of vitrified oocytes from IVF/ICSI cycles, the maturation stage (GV/MII) did not significantly influence the survival of vitrified oocytes. Likewise, our SRs are similar to those obtained in studies on GVs from unstimulated cycles [34,35,36]. Together, these SRs suggest that vitrification is a technique that can be applied to both immature and in vitro matured oocytes; moreover, they suggest that GVs recovered after stimulation or in a natural cycle have a comparable SR.
Culture conditions can alter the number of some oocyte structures during vitrification. Specifically, a decrease in the number of aquaporins has been described in oocytes matured in vitro, as opposed to in vivo, which may decrease the permeability of the membrane and augment their sensitivity to cryopreservation [37]. Nevertheless, the SR of MII oocytes obtained after IVM did not differ here from that of fresh oocytes, irrespective of the IVM medium used or the time in culture. Hence, neither the culture conditions nor the IVM times used here seem to affect the resistance to cryopreservation of the MII oocytes obtained.
In terms of IVM, the higher MR of vitrified GV relative to fresh oocytes has not been universally reported, although a higher MR after freezing GVs has been seen previously [38]. Elsewhere, similar MRs were reported between vitrified and fresh oocytes [29,39,40,41] or they were higher in non-vitrified oocytes [40,42]. Nevertheless, a recent meta-analysis questions the negative effects in vitrified GVs [15]. In fact, Ca2+ currents are necessary for rupture of the nuclear envelope and for the resumption of meiosis during cytoplasmic maturation [43]; in addition, an increase in intracellular Ca2+ was seen to be caused by the reagents used for vitrification, which aided the maturation of oocytes that had been previously vitrified [44,45,46,47]. The limited exposure to dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) in the vitrification medium at room temperature may also improve the MR, without inducing spontaneous parthenogenesis [48]. Furthermore, vitrification of these oocytes in mammals appears to reduce in the intra-oocyte cAMP, favoring the resumption of meiosis and, hence, oocyte maturation [40]. These findings may explain the enhanced MR of GV-Vit oocytes detected here. Nevertheless, it must be noted that when the IVF medium was used, there were no significant differences in the MR of GVs, irrespective of whether they were vitrified prior to their IVM. Together, these data suggest that the vitrification and IVM conditions may influence the MR of oocytes, despite the ongoing controversy regarding the possible reasons underlying such an effect.
The use of an embryo culture medium designed to reach the blastocyst stage as a basal medium for IVM has previously been proposed, such as “Blastocyst culture medium” (BMI, Suwon, South Korea), “Blastocyst medium” (COOK Medical, Bloomington, Indiana), and CCMTM (Vitrolife®, Gothenburg, Sweden [22,23,24]). Here, we obtained higher MRs with GVBD and 48 h oocytes using CCMTM supplemented with hMG and SSS than when an early-stage gamete/embryo culture medium was used. With this medium, our 48 h MR was similar to those previously obtained with human oocytes from stimulated patients or from unstimulated cycles [23,24]. Embryo culture media designed for blastocysts simulate the micro-environment found in the uterus endometrium, and they provide the embryo with important energetic metabolites from the glycolytic pathway such as pyruvate and adenosyltriphospate (ATP). Such media has been supplemented with hMG, SSS, pyruvate, streptomycin, and penicillin [22], or only with hMG [24]. The presence of serum in the medium was seen to significantly improve the competence of immature oocytes to reach the MII stage, reducing the cytoplasmic damage induced by both vitrification and the removal of the granulosa cells [42]. This was sustained in other studies where the absence of granulosa cells and exposure to gonadotropins accelerates in vitro meiotic maturation [49,50,51]. Nevertheless, this acceleration may disrupt the synchronization between nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation, resulting in less competent oocytes and, thus, embryos with diminished developmental potential [40]. Our results confirm that the use of commercial media to blastocyst for IVM is reasonable, as long as they are properly supplemented. Furthermore, it seems that using immature oocytes obtained from natural [22,24] or stimulated [52,53] cycles does not influence the MR, even if the latter are no longer associated with the granulosa cells.
Only when culture medium to blastocyst supplemented with hMG and SSS was used, was a significantly higher AR evident when oocytes were vitrified after their maturation (MII-Vit). Our AR was lower than expected [54,55], which could be due to the modifications to the different protocols introduced. For example, we maintained the oocytes at 37 °C during the two activation steps instead of decreasing this to room temperature during ionomycin exposure [54]. Alternatively, the concentration of ionomycin was reduced by 50% in another protocol as electrical activation was performed prior to chemical activation [55]. Our data suggest that at least in the supplemented medium, the stage at which oocytes are cryopreserved may influence their AR. Activation depends on the ability of the oocyte to release Ca2+ in the presence of an adequate stimulus, as develops during maturation. For this, it is necessary to capacitate the oocytes during maturation through their sensitivity to inositol triphosphate (IP3), leading to a reorganization of the Ca2+ stores, an increase in their IP3 receptors, and a reorganization of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Cryopreservation studies on mouse oocytes concluded that warmed GVs can release Ca2+ in response to IP3, indicating that their membranes had not been damaged [41]. However, it seems that this sensitivity to IP3 does not exist in human oocytes [56]. This data can be explained by the functionality of the ER, an essential component of the Ca2+ release system that also acts as a store for this cation. This cytoplasmic structure remains intact after vitrified GV warming; yet, during their IVM, the expected reorganization does not occur and consequently, there is a decrease in the number of saccules and cortical aggregates [26,41,56].
Regarding the subsequent embryonic development, the excision rates that we obtained ranged from 60.5% to 88.9%, and day 3 embryos had between 4 and 5 cells on average, consistent with data from previous studies in which slower rates of division were seen in embryos that underwent IVM [6,57]. This slower development was attributed to defects in oocyte cytoplasmic maturation due to the loss of cytoplasmic proteins; and/or a decrease in the synchrony between nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation, as reflected by the microtubule dynamics and chromatin phosphorylation in IVM oocytes [58,59]. However, the same development potential to blastocyst was reported for oocytes matured both in vitro and in vivo, although only if they had not been preserved [60]. Nevertheless, if oocytes were vitrified, the main problem for their development was the embryonic transition at day 3, which many failed to overcome [17,60]. We mainly observed this noxious effect in oocytes vitrified at the MII stage that were matured in the medium with worst results (IVF), reaching a significantly higher rate of division (88.9%), but with less blastocyst formation (2.8%).
In this study, the development to blastocyst of activated MII oocytes matured in vitro did not differ significantly, with rates comparable to those reported in the literature [54,55,57]. Nevertheless, when these oocytes are fecundated by ICSI, the published BRs are generally higher, reaching 32.7% [6,22,36], indicating that the method of activation may affect embryo development. Moreover, inadequate or incomplete maturation may be the main problem, not only for initiating the mechanisms driven by fecundation, but also to overcome the activation of the embryonic genome that occurs after the division from six to eight cells in humans [61]. In this sense, it has been reported that the different composition of aquaporins in the plasma membrane affects morula cavitation and, hence, blastocele formation, as seen when comparing in vitro and in vivo matured MII oocytes [37,62].
To conclude, the survival and developmental rates of oocytes are independent of the specific IVM medium used and the maturation stage of the oocytes prior to vitrification (GV or MII). MRs may be affected by the stage of vitrification, the maturation medium, and the time of culture. This may explain the controversies in the literature and for this reason, optimized procedures are required for IVM technique to improve. Since the data from animal models cannot always be extrapolated to human populations, well-designed human clinical trials may represent the final push required to improve the options of IVM. Thus, it is recommended that more experience in IVM is acquired in all the IVF laboratories.

4. Materials and Methods

This was a prospective, randomized cohort study that was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe (Valencia, Spain) and on which 481 patients treated for IVF or fertility preservation were enrolled, aged between 18 and 40 years old. All the women included in the study were fully informed of the study’s goals and they gave their signed consent to donate the GVs collected from their intracytoplasmatic sperm microinjection (ICSI) cycles carried out in the human reproductive unit of the aforementioned hospital.

4.1. Experimental Desing

To evaluate the effects of oocyte cryopreservation, and of IVM on activation and early embryonic development, two experimental phases were established in which different IVM culture mediums were tested: Phase 1, in which the CM1 medium was used for the preparation and handling of gametes, IVF, and embryo culture up to 2–8 cells (Universal IVF Medium, Origio®: Màlov, Denmark); and Phase 2, CM2 medium for culture from day 3 to the blastocyst stage and subsequent transfer (CCMTM: Vitrolife®, Gothenburg, Sweden), supplemented with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG, Menopur® 75 UI, Ferring®: Madrid, Spain) and synthetic serum substitute (SSS IrvineScientific®: Santa Ana, CA, USA). The different experimental groups established were: GV-Vit, GVs vitrified and then, matured in vitro; MII-Vit, MII oocytes vitrified after being matured in vitro; and Not-Vit, GVs matured in vitro, but not vitrified (Figure 1).

4.2. Oocyte Collection

All the participants underwent controlled ovarian stimulation following a short antagonist protocol. Pituitary suppression was achieved by administering rec-FSH (150–300 IU/day Gonal F 1050: Merck and Co, Madrid, Spain) and GnRH (Orgalutran®: MSD and Co., Hoddesdon, UK). When at least three follicles had grown to >16 mm, ovulation was induced by administering 250 μg of rec-hCG (Ovitrelle: Merck, London, UK). Oocyte retrieval was performed 36 h after hCG administration by ultrasound-guided transvaginal puncture–aspiration. Cumulus-corona-oocyte (CCO) complexes were denuded using hyaluronidase (SynVitro® Hyadase, Origio® Solution: Màlov, Denmark) for no more than 30 s with a denudation pipette (Denudation pipette Flexipet®: Cook® Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA). Removal of the cumulus-corona cells is necessary to evaluate oocyte nuclear maturation. Despite coming from stimulated cycles, a total of 1113 GVs had an intracytoplasmic nucleus known as a germinal vesicle, characteristic of the prophase of the first meiotic division. In this study, we included all the oocytes that were relatively circular, between 120–140 μm in size, and with a homogeneous or slightly heterogeneous cytoplasm with no granularity due to inclusions or refractile bodies. We excluded 28 oocytes (2.5%) from the study as they were too large, presented dimorphisms in their zona pellucida, or had large vacuoles or signs of atresia/degeneration in their ooplasm.

4.3. In Vitro Maturation

GVs were cultured individually at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in micro-drops of culture medium (25 μL, CM1, or CM2) covered by mineral oil OVOILTM (Vitrolife® Göteborg, Sweden). Oocytes were observed under an inverted microscope (Olympus, IX70, Tokyo, Japan) 20, 24, 44, and 48 h after the IVM commenced. Mature oocytes were considered to be those in which GV rupture was observed and the first polar body (PB) was seen in the perivitelline space within the first 48 h of culture.

4.4. Oocyte Vitrification and Warming

Vitrification was achieved in a vitrification/warming medium with the Cryotop® open system device (Kitazato®: BioPharma Co., Shizuoka, Japan) and following a modified version of the protocol developed by Wang and Kuwayama [63,64]. The modification consisted of reducing the volumes indicated by the commercial company of each of the solutions used to tenth, maintaining the same exposure times to cryoprotectants. This protocol was employed with all the oocytes involved in this study, regardless of their maturation stage (GV or MII). The SR was evaluated microscopically with a Hoffman contrast 2 h after heating and it was based on observations of the previously described morphology, paying special attention to the integrity of the oocyte membrane.

4.5. Parthenogenetic Activation and Embryonic Development

Parthenogenetic activation (PA) of the oocytes was performed following the protocol developed by Paffoni, with minor modifications [57]. Oocytes were exposed to ionomycin calcium (10 μM: Sigma-Aldrich SRl, Milan, Italy) in an IVF medium for 5 min at 37 °C and 6% CO2 in the dark, and they were then exposed for 3 h to 6-Dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP, 2 mM: Sigma-Aldrich SRl, Milan, Italy) in an IVF medium under the same conditions. The oocytes were subsequently cultured in micro-drops of G1TMPlus (25 μL: Vitrolife®, Frölunda, Sweden) supplemented with 10% SSS and overlayed with mineral oil. After 18–20 h, the oocytes that did not extrude the second PB and that had only one big pronucleus (PN) were considered activated. Parthenogenetic zygotes were subjected to sequential culture in G1TMPlus supplemented with SSS until day 3 post-activation and then, in CCMTM supplemented with SSS until day 6 post-activation. Their developmental stage was evaluated every 24 h by observation under an inverted microscope for the 6 days in culture (Figure 2).

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The sample size required to detect a minimum of 35% difference in the oocytes between the control group (expected rate 15%) and any of the other experimental groups was calculated, obtaining a 95% confidence level (α = 5%) and a statistical power of 80% (β = 20%). The homogeneity of the groups was evaluated with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and the differences between the quantitative variables were verified using a T-test or a Mann–Whitney U test. For the qualitative variables, the X2 test or Fisher’s test was used if both variables were dichotomous or some cells contained an expected frequency less than 5%. The different parameters were compared using contingency tables and X2 tests, with a level of α equal to 0.05: the maturation rates [MR = (MII oocytes (24–48 h)/GV oocytes) × 100], survival rate [SR = (viable devitrified oocytes/vitrified oocytes) × 100], activation rates [AR = (oocytes with 1PB/oocytes exposed to ICa2++ 6-DMAP) × 100], cleavage rate [CR = (embryos dividing post-activation/zygotes 1PB) × 100]; blastocyst rate [BR = (cavitated embryos/zygotes 1PB) × 100], and embryo cell number at day 3 (CN = embryo cells number/zygotes). Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Author Contributions

All the authors contributed to this study and performed one or more experiments. Investigation, I.P., I.M., L.G.-V. and R.R.; methodology, I.P., I.M., L.G.-V., P.P. and R.R.; supervision, I.P., I.M., M.J.G.-T. and A.M.; writing—original draft, I.P., I.M. and R.F.; writing—review and editing, I.P., I.M., M.J.G.-T. and A.M; and funding acquisition, M.J.G.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Human Fertility Chair of the University of Alicante and the Department of Biotechnology of the University of Alicante (VIGROB-186).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of La Fe Health (protocol code: 2018/0357 and date of approval: 19 December 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbrevations

6-DMAP6-Dimethylaminopurine
AR Activation rate
ARTAssisted reproductive technique
ATPAdenosyltriphospate
BRBlastocyst rate
CMCulture medium
CNEmbryo cell number at day 3
CCOCumulus-corona-oocyte
CRCleavage rate
EREndoplasmic reticulum
FSHFollicle stimulating hormone
GnRHGonadotropin releasing hormone
GVGerminal vesicle
GVBD Germinal vesicle breakdown
hHours
hMGHuman menopausal gonadotropin
HTFHuman tubal fluid
hCGHuman chorionic gonadotropin
ICSIIntracytoplasmic sperm microinjection
IP3Inositol triphosphate
IVFIn vitro fertilization
IVMIn vitro maturation
MIIMetaphase II
MRMaturation rate
OVOocyte vitrification
PAParthenogenetic activation
PBPolar body
PNPronucleus
SRSurvival rate
SSSSynthetic serum substitute

References

  1. Bosch, E.; De Vos, M.; Humaidan, P. The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Font. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Cobo, A.; García-Velasco, J.A.; Coello, A.; Domingo, J.; Pellicer, A.; Remohí, J. Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 105, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cobo, A.; Giles, J.; Paolelli, S.; Pellicer, A.; Remohí, J.; García-Velasco, J.A. Oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: An observational study. Fertil. Steril. 2020, 113, 836–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pujol, A.; Zamora, M.J.; Obradors, A.; Garcia, D.; Rodriguez, A.; Vassena, R. Comparison of two different oocyte vitrification methods: A prospective, paired study on the same genetic background and stimulation protocol. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cohen, Y.; St-Onge-St-Hilaire, A.; Tannus, S.; Younes, G.; Dahan, M.H.; Buckett, W.; Son, W.Y. Decreased pregnancy and live birth rates after vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2018, 35, 1683–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Escrich, L.; Galiana, Y.; Grau, N.; Insua, F.; Soler, N.; Pellicer, A.; Escribá, M.J. Do immature and mature sibling oocytes recovered from stimulated cycles have the same reproductive potential? Reprod. Biomed. Online 2018, 37, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Farsi, M.M.; Jorsaraei, S.G.; Esmaelzadeh, S.; Golaipour, M.J. In vitro maturation of germinal vesicle oocytes in stimulated intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Cell J. 2011, 13, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee, H.J.; Barad, D.H.; Kushnir, V.A.; Shohat-Tal, A.; Lazzaroni-Tealdi, E.; Wu, Y.G.; Gleicher, N. Rescue in vitro maturation (IVM) of immature oocytes in stimulated cycles in women with low functional ovarian reserve (LFOR). Endocrine 2016, 52, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Son, W.Y.; Chung, J.T.; Demirtas, E.; Holzer, H.; Sylvestre, C.; Buckett, W.; Chian, R.C.; Tan, S.L. Comparison of in-vitro maturation cycles with and without in-vivo matured oocytes retrieved. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2008, 17, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tucker, M.J.; Wright, G.; Morton, P.C.; Massey, J.B. Birth after cryopreservation of immature oocytes with subsequent in vitro maturation. Fertil. Steril. 1998, 70, 578–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, H.; Lv, J.Q.; Ge, H.S.; Wu, X.M.; Xi, H.T.; Chi, H.H.; Zhu, C.F.; Huang, J.H. Live Birth Following Vitrification of in Vitro Matured Oocytes Derived From Sibling Smaller Follicles at Follicle Selection Phase in the Context of in Vitro Fertilization. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2014, 30, 624–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chian, R.C.; Gilbert, L.; Huang, J.Y.; Demirtas, E.; Holzer, H.; Benjamin, A.; Buckett, W.M.; Tulandi, T.; Tan, S.L. Live Birth After Vitrification of in Vitro Matured Human Oocytes. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 91, 372–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cobo, A.; Garrido, N.; Crespo, J.; José, R.; Pellicer, A. Accumulation of oocytes: A new strategy for managing low-responder patients. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2012, 24, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Fasano, G.; Demeestere, I.; Englert, Y. In-vitro maturation of human oocytes: Before or after vitrification? J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2012, 29, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Khalili, M.A.; Shahedi, A.; Ashourzadeh, S.; Nottola, S.A.; Macchiarelli, G.; Palmerini, M.G. Vitrification of human immature oocytes before and after in vitro maturation: A review. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2017, 34, 1413–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lee, J.A.; Sekhon, L.; Grunfeld, L.; Copperman, A.B. In-vitro maturation of germinal vesicle and metaphase I eggs prior to cryopreservation optimizes reproductive potential in patients undergoing fertility preservation. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 26, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hatirnaz, S.; Ata, B.; Saynur-Hatirnaz, E.; Dahan, M.H.; Tannus, S.; Tan, J.; Tan, S.L. Oocyte in vitro maturation: A sytematic review. J. Turkish. Soc. Obstetr. Gynecol. 2018, 15, 112–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mandelbaum, J.; Anastasiou, O.; Lévy, R.; Guérin, J.F.; de Larouzière, V.; Antoine, J.M. Effects of cryopreservation on the meiotic spindle of human oocytes. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2004, 113, S17–S23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Van Blerkom, J. Maturation at high frequency of germinal-vesicle-stage mouse oocytes after cryopreservation: Alterations in cytoplasmic, nuclear, nucleolar and chromosomal structure and organization associated with vitrification. Hum. Reprod. 1989, 4, 883–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. de Araujo, C.H.; Nogueira, D.; de Araujo, M.C.; Martins, W.P.; Ferriani, R.A.; dos Reis, R.M. Supplemented tissue culture medium 199 is a better medium for in vitro maturation of oocytes from women with polycystic ovary syndrome women than human tubal fluid. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 91, 509–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Filali, M.; Hesters, L.; Fanchin, R.; Tachdjian, G.; Frydman, R.; Frydman, N. Retrospective comparison of two media for invitro maturation of oocytes. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2008, 16, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kim, M.; Hong, S.J.; Lee, J.H.; Min, C.K.; Hwang, K.J.; Park, R.W. Comparison of in vitro maturation media of immature oocytes: The effectiveness of blastocyst culture media. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 554–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Escrich, L.; Grau, N.; de los Santos, M.J.; Romero, J.L.; Pellicer, A.; Escribá, M.J. The Dynamics of in Vitro Maturation of Germinal Vesicle Oocytes. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 98, 1147–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pongsuthirak, P.; Songveeratham, S.; Vutyavanich, T. Comparison of blastocyst and Sage media for in vitro maturation of human immature oocytes. Reprod. Sci. 2015, 22, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Coticchio, G.; Dal Canto, M.; Fadini, R.; Mignini, R.M.; Guglielmo, M.C.; Miglietta, S.; Palmerini, M.G.; Macchiarelli, G.; Nottola, S.A. Ultrastructure of human oocytes after in vitro maturation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 22, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Segovia, Y.; Victory, N.; Peinado, I.; García-Valverde, L.; García, M.; Aizpurua, J.; Monzó, A.; Gómez-Torres, M.J. Ultrastructural characteristics of human oocytes vitrified before and after in vitro maturation. J. Reprod. Dev. 2017, 63, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Ci, Q.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, S.; Gao, Q.; Shi, Y. Confocal microscopic analysis of the microfilament configurations from human vitrification-thawed oocytes matured in vitro. CryoLetters 2014, 35, 544–548. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhu, L.; Han, C.S.; Cao, Z.L.; Wang, Z.B.; Han, R.G.; Wang, B.; Sun, Q.Y. Confocal Microscopic Analysis of the Spindle and Chromosome Configurations of in vitro-Matured Oocytes from Different Types of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2015, 80, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peinado, I.; Moya, I.; Sáez-Espinosa, P.; Barrera, M.; García-Valverde, L.; Francés, R.; Torres, P.; Gómez-Torres, M.J. Impact of Maturation and Vitrification Time of Human GV Oocytes on the Metaphase Plate Configuration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Choy, J.S.; Acuña, R.; Au, W.C.; Basrai, M.A. A Role for Histone H4K16 Hypoacetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kinetochore Function. Genetics 2011, 189, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Huang, J.; Li, T.; Ding, C.H.; Brosens, J.; Zhou, C.Q.; Wang, H.H.; Xu, Y.W. Insufficient histone-3 lysine-9 deacetylation in human oocytes matured in vitro is associated with aberrant meiosis. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 97, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Huang, J.; Ding, C.H.; Li, Z.Y.; Zhang, X.B.; You, Z.S.; Zhou, C.Q.; Xu, Y.W. Epigenetic changes of histone deacetylation in murine oocytes matured in vitro versus in vivo. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 21, 2039–2044. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Yang, F.; Baumann, C.; Viveiros, M.M.; De La Fuente, R. Histone hyperacetylation during meiosis interferes with large-scale chromatin remodeling, axial chromatid condensation and sister chromatid separation in the mammalian oocyte. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2012, 56, 889–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, H.; Racowsky, C.; Combelles, C.M. Is it best to cryopreserve human cumulus-free immature oocytes before or after in vitro maturation? Cryobiology 2012, 65, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Brambillasca, F.; Guglielmo, M.C.; Coticchio, G.; Mignini, R.M.; Dal, C.M.; Fadini, R. The current challenges to efficient immature oocyte cryopreservation. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2013, 30, 1531–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Cao, Y.X.; Chian, R.C. Fertility preservation with immature and in vitro matured oocytes. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2009, 27, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Van den, A.E.; Schneider, U.; Liu, J.; Agca, Y.; Critser, J.K.; Van, S.A. Osmotic responses and tolerance limits to changes in external osmolalities, and oolemma permeability characteristics, of human in vitro matured MII oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 2007, 22, 1959–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Toth, T.L.; Baka, S.G.; Veeck, L.L.; Jones, H.W., Jr.; Muasher, S.; Lanzendorf, S.E. Fertilization and in vitro development of cryopreserved human prophase I oocytes. Fertil. Steril. 1994, 61, 891–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Boiso, I.; Marti, M.; Santalo, J.; Ponsa, M.; Barri, P.N.; Veiga, A. A confocal microscopy analysis of the spindle and chromosome configurations of human oocytes cryopreserved at the germinal vesicle and metaphase II stage. Hum. Reprod. 2002, 17, 1885–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ezoe, K.; Yabuuchi, A.; Tani, T.; Mori, C.; Miki, T.; Takayama, Y.; Beyhan, Z.; Kato, Y.; Okuno, T.; Kobayashi, T.; et al. Developmental Competence of Vitrified-Warmed Bovine Oocytes at the Germinal-Vesicle Stage is Improved by Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Modulators during In Vitro Maturation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lowther, K.M.; Weitzman, V.N.; Maier, D.; Mehlmann, L.M. Maturation, fertilization, and the structure and function of the endoplasmic reticulum in cryopreserved mouse oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 81, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bogliolo, L.; Ariu, F.; Fois, S.; Rosati, I.; Zedda, M.T.; Leoni, G.; Succu, S.; Ledda, S. Morphological and biochemical analysis of immature ovine oocytes vitrified with or without cumulus cells. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 1138–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Takahashi, T.; Igarashi, H.; Doshida, M.; Takahashi, K.; Nakahara, K.; Tezuka, N.; Kurachi, H. Lowering intracellular and extracellular calcium contents prevents cytotoxic effects of ethylene glycolbased vitrification solution in unfertilized mouse oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2004, 68, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Larman, M.G.; Sheehan, C.B.; Gardner, D.K. Calcium-free vitrification reduces cryoprotectant-induced zona pellucida hardening and increases fertilization rates in mouse oocytes. Reproduction 2006, 131, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kohaya, N.; Fujiwara, K.; Ito, J.; Kashiwazaki, N. High developmental rates of mouse oocytes cryopreserved by an optimized vitrification protocol: The effects of cryoprotectants, calcium and cumulus cells. J. Reprod. Dev. 2011, 57, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Marques, C.C.; Santos-Silva, C.; Rodrigues, C.; Matos, J.E.; Moura, T.; Baptista, M.C.; Horta, A.E.M.; Bessa, R.J.B.; Alves, S.P.; Soveral, G.; et al. Bovine oocyte membrane permeability and cryosurvival: Effects of different cryoprotectans and calcium in the vitrification media. Cryobiology 2018, 81, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Succu, S.; Berlinguer, F.; Leoni, G.G.; Bebbere, D.; Satta, V.; Marco-Jimenez, F.; Pasciu, V.; Naitana, S. Calcium concentration in vitrification medium affects the developmental competence of in vitro matured ovine oocytes. Theriogenology 2011, 75, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Isachenko, V.; Montag, M.; Isachenko, E.; Dessole, S.; Nawroth, F.; Van der Ven, H. Aseptic vitrification of human germinal vesicle oocytes using dimethyl sulfoxide as a cryoprotectant. Fertil. Steril. 2006, 85, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cha, K.Y.; Chian, R.C. Maturation in vitro of immature human oocytes for clinical use. Hum Reprod. Update. 1998, 4, 103–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gomez, E.; Tarin, J.J.; Pellicer, A. Oocyte maturation in humans: The role of gonadotropins and growth factors. Fertil. Steril. 1993, 60, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Goud, P.T.; Goud, A.P.; Qian, C.; Laverge, H.; Van der, E.J.; De, S.P.; Dhont, M. In-vitro maturation of human germinal vesicle stage oocytes: Role of cumulus cells and epidermal growth factor in the culture medium. Hum. Reprod. 1998, 13, 1638–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Moschini, R.M.; Chuang, L.; Poleshchuk, F.; Slifkin, R.E.; Copperman, A.B.; Barritt, J. Commercially available enhanced in vitro maturation medium does not improve maturation of germinal vesicle and metaphase I oocytes in standard in vitro fertilization cases. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 2645–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Roberts, R.; Franks, S.; Hardy, K. Culture environment modulates maturation and metabolism of human oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 2002, 17, 2950–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Imesch, P.; Scheiner, D.; Xie, M.; Fink, D.; Macas, E.; Dubey, R.; Imthurn, B. Developmental potential of human oocytes matured in vitro followed by vitrification and activation. J. Ovarian. Res. 2013, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Yan, J.; Yang, Y.; Liying, Y.; Zichuan, L.; Ping, L.; Huailiang, F.; Qi, Z.; Jie, Q. In vitro maturation of cumulus- partially enclosed immature human oocytes by priming with gonadotropin. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 96, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mann, J.S.; Lowther, K.M.; Mehlmann, L.M. Reorganization of the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Develeoment of Ca2+ Release Mechanisms During Meiotic Maturation of Human Oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 2010, 83, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Paffoni, A.; Brevini, T.A.; Somigliana, E.; Restelli, L.; Gandolfi, F.; Ragni, G. In vitro development of human oocytes after parthenogenetic activation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil. Steril. 2007, 87, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Combelles, C.M.; Fissore, R.A.; Albertini, D.F.; Racowsky, C. In vitro maturation of human oocytes and cumulus cells using a co-culture three-dimensional collagen gel system. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 1349–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Magli, M.C.; Ferraretti, A.P.; Crippa, A.; Lappi, M.; Feliciani, E.; Gianaroli, L. First meiosis errors in immature oocytes generated by stimulated cycles. Fertil. Steril. 2006, 86, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sun, Y.; Gu, R.; Lu, X.; Zhao, S.; Feng, Y. Vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes diminishes embryo development potential before but not after embryo genomic activation. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016, 33, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Schramm, R.D.; Paprocki, A.M.; VandeVoort, C.A. Causes of developmental failure of in-vitro matured rhesus monkey oocytes: Impairments in embryonic genome activation. Hum. Reprod. 2003, 18, 826–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Ghetler, Y.; Yavin, S.; Shalgi, R.; Arav, A. The effect of chilling on membrane lipid phase transition in human oocytes and zygotes. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 3385–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, C.T.; Liang, L.; Witz, C.; Williams, D.; Griffith, J.; Skorupski, J.; Haddad, G.; Gill, J.; Wang, W. Optimized protocol for cryopreservation of human eggs improves developmental competence and implantation of resulting embryos. J. Ovarian Res. 2013, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Kuwayama, M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: The Cryotop method. Theriogenology 2007, 67, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 24 00417 g001 550
Figure 1. Experimental design describing the study groups and the methodology used, as well as the different in vitro maturation times (24 and 48 h): GV, prophase I; MI, metaphase I; MII, metaphase II; OV, oocytes vitrification; IVM, in vitro maturation.
Figure 1. Experimental design describing the study groups and the methodology used, as well as the different in vitro maturation times (24 and 48 h): GV, prophase I; MI, metaphase I; MII, metaphase II; OV, oocytes vitrification; IVM, in vitro maturation.
Ijms 24 00417 g001
Ijms 24 00417 g002 550
Figure 2. Bright field micrographs of embryos after activation. micrographs are labeled with a letter and a number. The letter refers to the stage of embryonic development and the number to the oocyte PI of the study. (A) 2-cell embryo. (B) 3-cell embryo. (C) 4-cell embryo. (D) 5-cell embryo. (E) 6-cell embryo. (F) 7-cell embryo. (G) 9-cell embryo. (H) Early compaction. (I) Morula. (J) Formation of the blastocyst cavity. (K) Fully expanded blastocyst. (L) Hatching blastocyst. (M) Hatched blastocyst. All micrographs were taken 20×, except the first image “M940” with a 10× objective.
Figure 2. Bright field micrographs of embryos after activation. micrographs are labeled with a letter and a number. The letter refers to the stage of embryonic development and the number to the oocyte PI of the study. (A) 2-cell embryo. (B) 3-cell embryo. (C) 4-cell embryo. (D) 5-cell embryo. (E) 6-cell embryo. (F) 7-cell embryo. (G) 9-cell embryo. (H) Early compaction. (I) Morula. (J) Formation of the blastocyst cavity. (K) Fully expanded blastocyst. (L) Hatching blastocyst. (M) Hatched blastocyst. All micrographs were taken 20×, except the first image “M940” with a 10× objective.
Ijms 24 00417 g002
Table
Table 1. Maturation rates (MR) evaluated relative to the maturation stage prior to vitrification in the groups studied (GV vitrified and GV fresh). MR in relation to germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) after 24 h (24 h) and 48 h (48 h) in culture. Average percentage by group and p-value.
Table 1. Maturation rates (MR) evaluated relative to the maturation stage prior to vitrification in the groups studied (GV vitrified and GV fresh). MR in relation to germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) after 24 h (24 h) and 48 h (48 h) in culture. Average percentage by group and p-value.
GV StageMR
GVBD24 h48 h
Vitrified83.7% (349/417)59.2% (247/417) 74.3% (310/417)
Fresh73.0% (374/512)49.6% (234/512)62.7% (321/512)
p-value<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Table
Table 2. Maturation rates (MRs) evaluated in relation to the maturation medium used for each of the groups studied: GV vitrified and GV fresh. The MRs in relation to germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) after 24 h (24 h) and 48 h (48 h) in culture. CM1, IVF medium; CM2, CCM supplemented medium. Average percentages relative to the groups and p-value.
Table 2. Maturation rates (MRs) evaluated in relation to the maturation medium used for each of the groups studied: GV vitrified and GV fresh. The MRs in relation to germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) after 24 h (24 h) and 48 h (48 h) in culture. CM1, IVF medium; CM2, CCM supplemented medium. Average percentages relative to the groups and p-value.
IVM MediumGV StageMR
GVBD24 h48 h
CM1Vitrified73.2% (109/149)42.3% (63/149)59.7% (89/149)
Fresh70.2% (207/295)39.7% (117/295)53.9% (159/295)
p-value 0.5790.6100.266
CM2Vitrified89.6% (240/268)68.7% (184/268)82.5% (221/268)
Fresh78.2% (229/293)64.2% (188/293)74.1% (217/293)
p-value <0.00010.2390.016
Table
Table 3. Activation rate (AR), cleavage rate (CR), and blastocyst rate (BR) evaluated relative to the maturation stage prior to vitrification in the groups studied (GV and MII), both in CM1 medium. Average proportions by group and p-value.
Table 3. Activation rate (AR), cleavage rate (CR), and blastocyst rate (BR) evaluated relative to the maturation stage prior to vitrification in the groups studied (GV and MII), both in CM1 medium. Average proportions by group and p-value.
CM1
Vitrification StageRATES
ARCRBR
GV58.5% (38/65)60.5% (23/38)7.9% (3/38)
MII49.3% (36/73)88.9% (32/36)2.8% (1/36)
p-value0.3090.0070.615
Table
Table 4. Activation rate (AR), cleavage rate (CR), and blastocyst rate (BR) evaluated relative to the maturation stage prior to vitrification in the groups studied (GV-Vit, MII-Vit, and Not-Vit), both in CM2 (CCM supplemented medium). Average proportions by group and p-value. SDa (MII-Vit vs. Not-Vit, p-value= 0.037) and SDb (GV-Vit vs. MII-Vit, p-value= 0.026).
Table 4. Activation rate (AR), cleavage rate (CR), and blastocyst rate (BR) evaluated relative to the maturation stage prior to vitrification in the groups studied (GV-Vit, MII-Vit, and Not-Vit), both in CM2 (CCM supplemented medium). Average proportions by group and p-value. SDa (MII-Vit vs. Not-Vit, p-value= 0.037) and SDb (GV-Vit vs. MII-Vit, p-value= 0.026).
CM2
Study GroupRATES
ARCRBR
GV-Vit42.6% (75/176)78.7% (59/75)6.7% (5/75)
MII-Vit56.7% (59/104)72.9% (43/59)5.1% (3/59)
Not-Vit36% (9/25)77.8% (7/9)11.1% (1/9)
p-valueSDabNoSDNoSD
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peinado, I.; Moya, I.; García-Valverde, L.; Francés, R.; Ribes, R.; Polo, P.; Gómez-Torres, M.J.; Monzó, A. Potential Development of Vitrified Immature Human Oocytes: Influence of the Culture Medium and the Timing of Vitrification. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010417

AMA Style

Peinado I, Moya I, García-Valverde L, Francés R, Ribes R, Polo P, Gómez-Torres MJ, Monzó A. Potential Development of Vitrified Immature Human Oocytes: Influence of the Culture Medium and the Timing of Vitrification. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(1):417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010417

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peinado, Irene, Isabel Moya, Laura García-Valverde, Raquel Francés, Rosana Ribes, Patrocinio Polo, María José Gómez-Torres, and Ana Monzó. 2023. "Potential Development of Vitrified Immature Human Oocytes: Influence of the Culture Medium and the Timing of Vitrification" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 1: 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010417

APA Style

Peinado, I., Moya, I., García-Valverde, L., Francés, R., Ribes, R., Polo, P., Gómez-Torres, M. J., & Monzó, A. (2023). Potential Development of Vitrified Immature Human Oocytes: Influence of the Culture Medium and the Timing of Vitrification. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(1), 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010417

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop