Next Article in Journal
Past COVID-19: The Impact on IVF Outcomes Based on Follicular Fluid Lipid Profile
Next Article in Special Issue
A Newly Developed Chemically Defined Serum-Free Medium Suitable for Human Primary Keratinocyte Culture and Tissue Engineering Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Crosstalk between Nutrition, Insulin, Juvenile Hormone, and Ecdysteroid Signaling in the Classical Insect Model, Rhodnius prolixus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sources, Selection, and Microenvironmental Preconditioning of Cells for Urethral Tissue Engineering
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Tissue Engineering for Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Tracts

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010009
by Elissa Elia 1,†, David Brownell 1,†, Stéphane Chabaud 1 and Stéphane Bolduc 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010009
Submission received: 1 November 2022 / Revised: 10 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 20 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tissue Engineering and Cell Therapy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I read with interest this extensive review about tissue engineering of gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract.

This manuscript has many strong points.

1. It is written in a understandable and plain English language. The authors are not native speakers ( Canadians from French speaking region) however the language is quite in a high level and gives the readers a pleasure to read this interesting article.

2.It is very analytical and to the point reports the various strategies and techniques in different organs.

3. The figures are offering a good description and exhibition of the mechanisms of tissue engineering.

4.It offers information in readers who are not familiar.

My only remark is the in the tables, the word auteur should be replaced with the word author.

I congratulate the authors for their hard work.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

 

it was a pleasure to read your manuscript. Your deep insight into the field is very comprehensive. Nevertheless, I think you miss the important role of Wharton Jelly derived MSCs which has tremendous potential, are cheap and easy to collect and are ethically clean comparing to embryonic cells.

What is even more important, I think you miss a paragraph concerning conditions of MSC's culture (physiologic hypoxia, etc.) - establishing worldwide protocols for that is essential for the proper comparison of results in this field.

Please address those two queries.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop