The Effect of Polymeric Nanofibers Used for 3D-Printed Scaffolds on Cellular Activity in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Tissue Engineering
2.1. Bioprinting: Drawbacks and Advantages
2.2. Cardiovascular
2.3. Cartilage
2.4. Liver
2.5. Bone
2.6. Lung
2.7. Connective Tissue
2.8. Wound Healing and Skin Regeneration
3. Principal Challenges and Future Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Caplan, A.I. Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007, 213, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lavanya, K.; Chandran, S.V.; Balagangadharan, K.; Selvamurugan, N. Temperature-and pH-responsive chitosan-based injectable hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 111, 110862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Domínguez-Robles, J.; Martin, N.K.; Fong, M.L.; Stewart, S.A.; Irwin, N.J.; Rial-Hermida, M.I.; Donnelly, R.F.; Larrañeta, E. Antioxidant PLA composites containing lignin for 3D printing applications: A potential material for healthcare applications. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Liu, T.; Xu, R.; Mao, S.; Mo, X.; Zhang, T.; Ouyang, L.; Xiong, Z.; Sun, W. Advances in 3D bioprinting. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. Addit. Manuf. Front. 2022, 1, 100011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwab, A.; Levato, R.; D’Este, M.; Piluso, S.; Eglin, D.; Malda, J. Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 11028–11055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Ko, H.; Kwon, I.K.; Shin, K. Extracellular matrix revisited: Roles in tissue engineering. Int. Neurourol. J. 2016, 20 (Suppl. S1), S23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasita, R.; Katti, D.S. Nanofibers and their applications in tissue engineering. Int. J. Nanomed. 2006, 1, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kharaghani, D.; Gitigard, P.; Ohtani, H.; Kim, K.O.; Ullah, S.; Saito, Y.; Khan, M.Q.; Kim, I.S. Design and characterization of dual drug delivery based on in-situ assembled PVA/PAN core-shell nanofibers for wound dressing application. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kharaghani, D.; Dutta, D.; Ho, K.K.; Zhang, K.-Q.; Kai, W.; Ren, X.; Willcox, M.D.; Kim, I.S. Active loading graphite/hydroxyapatite into the stable hydroxyethyl cellulose scaffold nanofibers for artificial cornea application. Cellulose 2020, 27, 3319–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haider, M.K.; Kharaghani, D.; Sun, L.; Ullah, S.; Sarwar, M.N.; Ullah, A.; Khatri, M.; Yoshiko, Y.; Gopiraman, M.; Kim, I.S. Synthesized bioactive lignin nanoparticles/polycaprolactone nanofibers: A novel nanobiocomposite for bone tissue engineering. Biomater. Adv. 2023, 144, 213203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kharaghani, D.; Kurniwan, E.B.; Khan, M.Q.; Yoshiko, Y. MiRNA-nanofiber, the next generation of bioactive scaffolds for bone regeneration: A review. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ullah, A.; Sarwar, M.N.; Wang, F.-F.; Kharaghani, D.; Sun, L.; Zhu, C.; Yoshiko, Y.; Mayakrishnan, G.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, I.S. In Vitro biocompatibility, antibacterial activity, and release behavior of halloysite nanotubes loaded with diclofenac sodium salt incorporated in electrospun soy protein isolate/hydroxyethyl cellulose nanofibers. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 2022, 4, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umar, M.; Ullah, A.; Nawaz, H.; Areeb, T.; Hashmi, M.; Kharaghani, D.; Kim, K.O.; Kim, I.S. Wet-spun bi-component alginate based hydrogel fibers: Development and in-vitro evaluation as a potential moist wound care dressing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 168, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ullah, A.; Haider, M.K.; Wang, F.-F.; Morita, S.; Kharaghani, D.; Ge, Y.; Yoshiko, Y.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, I.S. “Clay-corn-caprolactone” a novel bioactive clay polymer nanofibrous scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Appl. Clay Sci. 2022, 220, 106455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mombini, S.; Mohammadnejad, J.; Bakhshandeh, B.; Narmani, A.; Nourmohammadi, J.; Vahdat, S.; Zirak, S. Chitosan-PVA-CNT nanofibers as electrically conductive scaffolds for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 140, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.Q.; Kharaghani, D.; Nishat, N.; Shahzad, A.; Yamamoto, T.; Inoue, Y.; Kim, I.S. In Vitro assessment of dual-network electrospun tubes from poly (1, 4 cyclohexane dimethylene isosorbide terephthalate)/PVA hydrogel for blood vessel application. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taneja, H.; Salodkar, S.M.; Parmar, A.S.; Chaudhary, S. Hydrogel based 3D printing: Bio ink for Tissue Engineering. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 367, 120390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chimene, D.; Kaunas, R.; Gaharwar, A.K. Hydrogel Bioink Reinforcement for Additive Manufacturing: A Focused Review of Emerging Strategies. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1902026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, D.-L.; Faraz, F.; Wang, J.-X.; Radacsi, N. Combination of 3D Printing and Electrospinning Techniques for Biofabrication. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7, 2101309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akoumianakis, I.; Polkinghorne, M.; Antoniades, C. Non-canonical WNT signalling in cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2022, 19, 783–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, Y.-J.; Jeong, S.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.J.; Jo, J.; Shanmugasundaram, A.; Kim, H.; Choi, E.; Lee, D.-W. 3D-printed cardiovascular polymer scaffold reinforced by functional nanofiber additives for tunable mechanical strength and controlled drug release. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 140118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Su, Y.; Chen, M. 3D myotube guidance on hierarchically organized anisotropic and conductive fibers for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 116, 111070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, Q.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Xu, L.; Jin, G.; Tang, L.; Ju, J.; Zhao, W.; Hou, R. Nanofiber electrospinning combined with rotary bioprinting for fabricating small-diameter vessels with endothelium and smooth muscle. Compos. Part. B Eng. 2022, 234, 109691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Yang, Y.; Ji, J.; Fang, Y.; Ouyang, L.; Zhang, L.; Sun, W. 3D-printed Bioresorbable Stent Coated with Dipyridamole-Loaded Nanofiber for Restenosis Prevention and Endothelialization. Int. J. Bioprinting 2022, 8, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, W.; Song, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Wang, C.; Liu, H.; Liu, Q.; Wang, J. Printability optimization of gelatin-alginate bioinks by cellulose nanofiber modification for potential meniscus bioprinting. J. Nanomater. 2020, 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stocco, T.D.; Moreira Silva, M.C.; Corat, M.A.F.; Gonçalves Lima, G.; Lobo, A.O. Towards Bioinspired Meniscus-Regenerative Scaffolds: Engineering a Novel 3D Bioprinted Patient-Specific Construct Reinforced by Biomimetically Aligned Nanofibers. Int. J. Nanomed. 2022, 2022, 1111–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rampichova, M.; Košt’áková Kuželová, E.; Filová, E.; Chvojka, J.; Šafka, J.; Pelcl, M.; Daňková, J.; Prosecka, E.; Buzgo, M.; Plencner, M. Composite 3D printed scaffold with structured electrospun nanofibers promotes chondrocyte adhesion and infiltration. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2018, 12, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Song, S.; Huang, J.; Fu, H.; Ning, X.; He, Y.; Zhang, Z. HBC-nanofiber hydrogel scaffolds with 3D printed internal microchannels for enhanced cartilage differentiation. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 6115–6127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baniasadi, H.; Polez, R.T.; Kimiaei, E.; Madani, Z.; Rojas, O.J.; Österberg, M.; Seppälä, J. 3D printing and properties of cellulose nanofibrils-reinforced quince seed mucilage bio-inks. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 192, 1098–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rokkanen, P.U.; Böstman, O.; Hirvensalo, E.; Mäkelä, E.A.; Partio, E.K.; Pätiälä, H.; Vainionpää, S.; Vihtonen, K.; Törmälä, P. Bioabsorbable fixation in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 2607–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saniei, H.; Mousavi, S. Surface modification of PLA 3D-printed implants by electrospinning with enhanced bioactivity and cell affinity. Polymer 2020, 196, 122467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pillai, M.M.; Tran, H.N.; Sathishkumar, G.; Manimekalai, K.; Yoon, J.; Lim, D.; Noh, I.; Bhattacharyya, A. Symbiotic culture of nanocellulose pellicle: A potential matrix for 3D bioprinting. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 119, 111552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sooriyaarachchi, D.; Wu, J.; Feng, A.; Islam, M.; Tan, G.Z. Hybrid fabrication of biomimetic meniscus scaffold by 3D printing and parallel electrospinning. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 34, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, F.; Groopman, J.D.; Pestka, J.J. Public health impacts of foodborne mycotoxins. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 5, 351–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pestka, J.J. Deoxynivalenol: Mechanisms of action, human exposure, and toxicological relevance. Arch. Toxicol. 2010, 84, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, K.; Sun, J.; Gao, Q.; Yang, X.; Ye, Y.; Ji, J.; Sun, X. 3D “honeycomb” cell/carbon nanofiber/gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) modified screen-printed electrode for electrochemical assessment of the combined toxicity of deoxynivalenol family mycotoxins. Bioelectrochemistry 2021, 139, 107743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Yuan, W.; Hong, Y.; Fan, S.; Yao, X.; Ren, T.; Song, L.; Yang, G.; Zhang, Y. 3D printed hydrogels with oxidized cellulose nanofibers and silk fibroin for the proliferation of lung epithelial stem cells. Cellulose 2021, 28, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, L.; Du, X.; Fan, S.; Yang, G.; Shao, H.; Li, D.; Cao, C.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, Y. Bacterial cellulose nanofibers promote stress and fidelity of 3D-printed silk based hydrogel scaffold with hierarchical pores. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 221, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, J.; Wang, B.; Li, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Sheng, N.; Liang, Q.; Wang, H.; Chen, S. A 3D-printable TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose/alginate hydrogel with enhanced stability via nanoclay incorporation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 238, 116207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monfared, M.; Mawad, D.; Rnjak-Kovacina, J.; Stenzel, M.H. 3D bioprinting of dual-crosslinked nanocellulose hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 6163–6175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitton, M.; Fiorati, A.; Buscemi, S.; Melone, L.; Farè, S.; Contessi Negrini, N. 3D Bioprinting of Pectin-Cellulose Nanofibers Multicomponent Bioinks. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 732689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sooriyaarachchi, D.; Minière, H.J.; Maharubin, S.; Tan, G.Z. Hybrid Additive Microfabrication Scaffold Incorporated with Highly Aligned Nanofibers for Musculoskeletal Tissues. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2019, 16, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ko, Y.-G.; Kwon, O.H. Reinforced gelatin-methacrylate hydrogels containing poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofiber fragments for 3D bioprinting. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 89, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.D.; Huang, C.F.; Hsu, S.H. Composites of waterborne polyurethane and cellulose nanofibers for 3D printing and bioapplications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 212, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Allardyce, B.J.; Rajkhowa, R.; Kalita, S.; Dilley, R.J.; Wang, X.; Liu, X. Silk particles, microfibres and nanofibres: A comparative study of their functions in 3D printing hydrogel scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 103, 109784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Serafin, A.; Murphy, C.; Rubio, M.C.; Collins, M.N. Printable alginate/gelatin hydrogel reinforced with carbon nanofibers as electrically conductive scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 122, 111927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kharaghani, D.; Kaffashsaei, E.; Haider, M.K.; Kim, I.S. The Effect of Polymeric Nanofibers Used for 3D-Printed Scaffolds on Cellular Activity in Tissue Engineering: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119464
Kharaghani D, Kaffashsaei E, Haider MK, Kim IS. The Effect of Polymeric Nanofibers Used for 3D-Printed Scaffolds on Cellular Activity in Tissue Engineering: A Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(11):9464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119464
Chicago/Turabian StyleKharaghani, Davood, Elmira Kaffashsaei, Md. Kaiser Haider, and Ick Soo Kim. 2023. "The Effect of Polymeric Nanofibers Used for 3D-Printed Scaffolds on Cellular Activity in Tissue Engineering: A Review" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 11: 9464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119464