Next Article in Journal
Vitamin D and Vitamin D Binding Protein in Health and Disease 2.0
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Functionalization of Bioresorbable Nanomembranes and Nanoparticles for Their Use in Biomedicine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antiretroviral Treatment of HIV-2 Infection: Available Drugs, Resistance Pathways, and Promising New Compounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Antivirals and Vaccines

1
Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal
2
Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health and Science, Campus Universitário, Quinta da Granja, Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Caparica, Portugal
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(12), 10315; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210315
Submission received: 7 June 2023 / Accepted: 12 June 2023 / Published: 19 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antivirals and Vaccines)
New antivirals are urgently needed to treat respiratory diseases caused by RNA viruses. Unlike virus-specific antivirals, host-directed antivirals—compounds that enable cells to fight viral infections—often have the advantage of being effective against multiple viruses, including drug-resistant strains (broad-spectrum antivirals) [1,2]. In addition, resistance selection is made more difficult because the compounds do not act directly on the virus, and their mechanisms of action are diverse. Unlike vaccines, these antivirals should be effective against evolving RNA virus variants, making them an important first step in the fight against new infections [2,3]. Although conceptually attractive, broad-spectrum host-directed antivirals are not yet used in the clinic, mainly due to their potential for high cellular and organismic toxicity, which can be difficult to characterise in preclinical studies; moreover, in most cases, they possess an undetermined mechanism of action (MoA). Setz et al. [4] show that pamapimod, a selective inhibitor of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase alpha (p38 MAPKα), and pioglitazone, a broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory used to treat type 2 diabetes, strongly inhibit replication of the major SARS-CoV-2 VoCs in vitro. The activation of p38 in the lungs and heart leads to the excessive inflammation that characterises COVID-19 [5]. In addition, Setz et al. [4] show that pamapimod and pioglitazone exhibit synergistic activity when used in combination, suggesting that their combined use may represent a potential therapy for COVID-19. The effect of oral pamapimod with pioglitazone on COVID-19 development and recovery in non-hospitalised patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 is currently being investigated in a Phase II clinical trial (KIN-FAST trial, NCT05659459). On the other hand, Thaler et al. [6] show that R-propranolol exhibits broad-spectrum anti-coronavirus activity, inhibiting the replication of MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 in several cell lines and in human primary bronchial epithelial cells. Using time-of-addition assays, the authors show that R-propranolol inhibits an unidentified post-entry step of the SARS-CoV-2 replication cycle, likely via a host cell factor. Propranolol, a mixture of the enantiomers R-propanolol and S-propanolol, is a non-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist (beta-blocker) used to inhibit the expression of the pro-angiogenic factor angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) in the treatment of infantile haemangiomas [7]. R-propanolol reduces the expression of ANGPTL4, but lacks S-propanolol’s β-blocker activity. SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to pathogenic blood vessel formation in the lungs (intussusceptive angiogenesis), which is associated with the upregulation of pro-angiogenic factors such as ANGPTL4 and VEGFA [8]. Thaler et al. [6] also investigated the effect of propranolol on ANGPTL4 expression. They found that SARS-CoV-2 upregulated ANGPTL4 in endothelial and other cells, which was suppressed by R-propranolol in a process that was partially independent of the antiviral effect. R-propranolol is therefore the first example of a host-centred antiviral compound, and also has the potential to prevent detrimental host responses to viral infection.
Coronavirus infection can lead to significant mortality rates and economic losses in pets and farm animals [9]. Human infection with new and emerging zoonotic coronaviruses is a concern, so the identification of antivirals that may be effective against animal coronaviruses is a priority. Swine acute diarrhoea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV) is an alpha coronavirus that causes high mortality in piglets and has a significant economic impact. SADS-CoV replicates in primary human cells, and therefore has inherent potential to spread between animal and human hosts [10,11]. There are currently no approved drugs or vaccines for SADS-CoV infection. Chen and colleagues [12] conducted a screening of more than 3500 compounds for anti-SADS-CoV activity. Gemcitabine, mycophenolic acid and its prodrug mycophenolate mofetil, methylene blue and cepharanthine were found to inhibit SADS-CoV in a dose-dependent manner. Cepharanthine and methylene blue prevented viral entry, and gemcitabine, mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolic acid and methylene blue inhibited viral replication after SADS-CoV entry. Of note, gemcitabine [13], mycophenolic acid [14], methylene blue [15] and cepharanthine [16] have also exhibited potent in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses. The broad-spectrum activity of these compounds and their established human clinical profile against COVID-19 and other human diseases [16,17,18] suggest that they may be useful in the treatment and prevention of potential outbreaks of SADS-CoV infection in pigs and humans.
Human breast milk contains secretory IgA (sIgA), macrophages, leukocytes and other components, such as lactoferrin, lysozyme, lactadherin, linoleic acid, mucins and human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), which contribute to the overall broad antiviral properties of human milk [19]. There are over a hundred different HMOs, all derived from lactose, which can be elongated, fucosylated or sialylated. HMOs can interfere with the viral life cycle in a number of ways. For example, HMOs can act as soluble decoy receptors for rotaviruses, preventing them from binding to cell receptors and entering cells [20,21], or they can bind to the HIV-1 envelope gp120 glycoprotein and prevent the virus from binding to the dendritic cell-specific ICAM3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN) [22]. Lou et al. [23] investigated the effects of sixteen components of human milk against coxsackievirus class A type 9 isolate (CVA9). CVA9 is a non-enveloped virus with a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome, and belongs to the family Picornaviridae, genus Enterovirus and species Enterovirus B (HEV-B). HEV-B infections usually cause mild illnesses such as hand, foot and mouth disease, but have the potential to cause more serious, life-threatening infections such as viral encephalitis and aseptic meningitis [24]. There are currently no approved drugs for infections caused by these highly variable viruses. Lou et al. [23] showed that 2’-Fucosyllactose (2’-FL) from human milk inhibited CVA9 replication in several cell lines. This effect occurred at several stages of the CVA9 life cycle, suggesting that 2’-FL acts at the cellular rather than the viral level. Enteroviruses begin their life cycle by binding to one or more cell surface receptors, leading to receptor-mediated endocytosis [25]. Receptor binding and/or pH changes in the endosomal system induce virus uncoating and the release of the viral genome from the capsid into the cytoplasm. Using time-of-addition and in silico molecular docking experiments, Lou et al. [23] found that 2’-FL binds to the attachment receptor αvβ 6 (ITGB6) and the uncoating receptors FCGRT and β2M, and exerts its inhibitory effect on CV-A9 at the level of attachment and internalisation.
Currently, it is estimated that approximately one–two million people worldwide are living with HIV-2, accounting for 3–5% of the global HIV burden [26,27]. Compared to HIV-1 infection, HIV-2 infection results in a much longer asymptomatic period, slower clinical progression and lower perinatal and sexual transmission rates. Despite the prolonged course of HIV-2 infection, early treatment initiation is recommended for all individuals, because without effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), a substantial proportion of people living with HIV-2 will develop AIDS and die [28,29]. However, many antiretroviral drugs do not work well or at all against HIV-2, which is intrinsically resistant to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide (T-20), some protease inhibitors (PIs) and fostemsavir, an attachment inhibitor [30,31,32,33]. In addition, to date, there have been no randomised clinical trials to guide the treatment of HIV-2 infection, particularly with regard to the choice of first- and second-line regimens. This has led to the initiation of treatment with ART regimens that are ineffective against HIV-2 [34,35]. An additional problem is that resistance to most drug classes emerges more rapidly in HIV-2 than in HIV-1 [36,37]. More effective ARVs and better use of those currently available are urgently needed for HIV-2. Moranguinho and colleagues reviewed the antiretroviral drugs presently available to treat HIV-2 infection, as well as promising drugs that are currently in development [38]. They also identified drug resistance mutations and resistance pathways that develop in HIV-2-infected individuals during treatment.
Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), a zoonotic, mosquito-borne virus, belongs to the genus Flavivirus in the family Flaviviridae, and is closely related to West Nile virus and dengue fever virus [39]. JEV is the leading cause of vaccine-preventable encephalitis globally. Based on the phylogenetic analysis of genomic sequences, genotypes I-V (GI-V) have been described for JEV [39]. Genotype I (GI) JEV is the dominant genotype worldwide and poses a significant threat to public health security [40]. JEV causes an estimated annual burden of 68,000 cases and 20,000 deaths, and JEV encephalitis can have permanent neurological or psychological effects. There is an urgent need for highly effective vaccines and antivirals for GI JEV strains. High-throughput strategies enable the rapid screening of library compounds (drugs and antibodies) for antiviral activity [41]. Li et al. [42] developed a recombinant GI JEV expressing a Gaussia luciferase (Gluc) gene for antiviral drug screening and neutralising antibody detection. Gluc is a small molecule with a high bioluminescent signal and is naturally secreted by mammalian cells into the culture medium, enabling quantification in culture supernatant [43]. The activity levels of the antivirals nitroxoline, ARDP0006 and ribavirin against GI JEV were similar when tested using a high-throughput assay based on the recombinant construct expressing Gluc, and standard antiviral assays using the GI JEV virus. Current commercial JEV vaccines are derived from the GIII strains. Using a novel Gluc readout-based serum neutralisation assay, Li et al. [42] showed that neutralising antibodies from GIII JEV vaccines exhibit low neutralising activity against GI JEV strains, likely explaining the low protection offered by this vaccine against infection with GI JEV strains. Their results suggest that the new GI JEV Gluc reporter virus is a valuable tool for the high-throughput identification of new JEV drug candidates and for neutralisation assays against GI JEV strains.
Mayaro virus (MAYV) is an enveloped positive-strand RNA alphavirus of the Togaviridae family that causes Mayaro fever, characterised by flu-like symptoms including fever, myalgia, arthralgia and rash [44]. In rare cases, Mayaro fever causes neurological complications, haemorrhagic manifestations and death. MAYV causes sporadic outbreaks in Central and South America, but has the potential to spread globally via Aedes mosquitoes [45]. MAYV is considered a human threat because most of the world’s population is immunologically naive to it, and no specific therapeutics or vaccines have been approved for MAYV infection [45,46]. Kim et al. [47] developed viral-vectored MAYV vaccines against MAYV infection. They constructed a replication-deficient simian adenovirus (ChAdOx2) and a modified Ankara virus (MVA)-based vaccine expressing the MAYV structural polyproteins (capsid, E3, E2, 6K, and E1). Balb/c mice primed with ChAdOx2 expressing the transgenes, and boosted with the recombinant MVA, produced antibodies that bind to the E2 envelope glycoproteins of MAYV and a related alphavirus, Chikungunya virus. In addition, mice produced neutralising antibodies against both viruses, supporting the further development of these virus-vectored vaccines as a multi-alphavirus vaccine.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wallis, R.S.; O’Garra, A.; Sher, A.; Wack, A. Host-directed immunotherapy of viral and bacterial infections: Past, present and future. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2023, 23, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adalja, A.; Inglesby, T. Broad-Spectrum Antiviral Agents: A Crucial Pandemic Tool. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2019, 17, 467–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zakaria, M.K.; Carletti, T.; Marcello, A. Cellular Targets for the Treatment of Flavivirus Infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Setz, C.; Grosse, M.; Auth, J.; Froba, M.; Rauch, P.; Bausch, A.; Wright, M.; Schubert, U. Synergistic Antiviral Activity of Pamapimod and Pioglitazone against SARS-CoV-2 and Its Variants of Concern. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Choudhary, S.; Sharma, K.; Silakari, O. The interplay between inflammatory pathways and COVID-19: A critical review on pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 150, 104673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thaler, M.; Salgado-Benvindo, C.; Leijs, A.; Tas, A.; Ninaber, D.K.; Arbiser, J.L.; Snijder, E.J.; van Hemert, M.J. R-Propranolol Has Broad-Spectrum Anti-Coronavirus Activity and Suppresses Factors Involved in Pathogenic Angiogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tan, X.; Guo, S.; Wang, C. Propranolol in the Treatment of Infantile Hemangiomas. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2021, 14, 1155–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ackermann, M.; Mentzer, S.J.; Kolb, M.; Jonigk, D. Inflammation and intussusceptive angiogenesis in COVID-19: Everything in and out of flow. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 56, 2003147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Subedi, S.; Koirala, S.; Chai, L. COVID-19 in Farm Animals: Host Susceptibility and Prevention Strategies. Animals 2021, 11, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Edwards, C.E.; Yount, B.L.; Graham, R.L.; Leist, S.R.; Hou, Y.J.; Dinnon, K.H., 3rd; Sims, A.C.; Swanstrom, J.; Gully, K.; Scobey, T.D.; et al. Swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus replication in primary human cells reveals potential susceptibility to infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 26915–26925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luo, Y.; Chen, Y.; Geng, R.; Li, B.; Chen, J.; Zhao, K.; Zheng, X.S.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, P.; Yang, X.L.; et al. Broad Cell Tropism of SADS-CoV In Vitro Implies Its Potential Cross-Species Infection Risk. Virol. Sin. 2021, 36, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, Y.; You, Y.; Wang, S.; Jiang, L.; Tian, L.; Zhu, S.; An, X.; Song, L.; Tong, Y.; Fan, H. Antiviral Drugs Screening for Swine Acute Diarrhea Syndrome Coronavirus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jang, Y.; Shin, J.S.; Lee, M.K.; Jung, E.; An, T.; Kim, U.I.; Kim, K.; Kim, M. Comparison of Antiviral Activity of Gemcitabine with 2'-Fluoro-2'-Deoxycytidine and Combination Therapy with Remdesivir against SARS-CoV-2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kato, F.; Matsuyama, S.; Kawase, M.; Hishiki, T.; Katoh, H.; Takeda, M. Antiviral activities of mycophenolic acid and IMD-0354 against SARS-CoV-2. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 64, 635–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gendrot, M.; Andreani, J.; Duflot, I.; Boxberger, M.; Le Bideau, M.; Mosnier, J.; Jardot, P.; Fonta, I.; Rolland, C.; Bogreau, H.; et al. Methylene blue inhibits replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 106202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fan, H.; He, S.T.; Han, P.; Hong, B.; Liu, K.; Li, M.; Wang, S.; Tong, Y. Cepharanthine: A Promising Old Drug against SARS-CoV-2. Adv. Biol. 2022, 6, e2200148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sajgure, A.; Kulkarni, A.; Joshi, A.; Sajgure, V.; Pathak, V.; Melinkeri, R.; Pathak, S.; Agrawal, S.; Naik, M.; Rajurkar, M.; et al. Safety and efficacy of mycophenolate in COVID-19: A nonrandomised prospective study in western India. Lancet Reg. Health Southeast Asia 2023, 11, 100154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dabholkar, N.; Gorantla, S.; Dubey, S.K.; Alexander, A.; Taliyan, R.; Singhvi, G. Repurposing methylene blue in the management of COVID-19: Mechanistic aspects and clinical investigations. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 142, 112023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wedekind, S.I.S.; Shenker, N.S. Antiviral Properties of Human Milk. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Laucirica, D.R.; Triantis, V.; Schoemaker, R.; Estes, M.K.; Ramani, S. Milk Oligosaccharides Inhibit Human Rotavirus Infectivity in MA104 Cells. J. Nutr. 2017, 147, 1709–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ramani, S.; Stewart, C.J.; Laucirica, D.R.; Ajami, N.J.; Robertson, B.; Autran, C.A.; Shinge, D.; Rani, S.; Anandan, S.; Hu, L.; et al. Human milk oligosaccharides, milk microbiome and infant gut microbiome modulate neonatal rotavirus infection. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hong, P.; Ninonuevo, M.R.; Lee, B.; Lebrilla, C.; Bode, L. Human milk oligosaccharides reduce HIV-1-gp120 binding to dendritic cell-specific ICAM3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN). Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 101, 482–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lou, F.; Hu, R.; Chen, Y.; Li, M.; An, X.; Song, L.; Tong, Y.; Fan, H. 2’-Fucosyllactose Inhibits Coxsackievirus Class A Type 9 Infection by Blocking Virus Attachment and Internalisation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Marjomäki, V.; Turkki, P.; Huttunen, M. Infectious Entry Pathway of Enterovirus B Species. Viruses 2015, 7, 6387–6399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Baggen, J.; Thibaut, H.J.; Strating, J.R.P.M.; van Kuppeveld, F.J.M. The life cycle of non-polio enteroviruses and how to target it. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 368–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. van Tienen, C.; van der Loeff, M.S. Epidemiology of HIV-2 Infection in West Africa. In Encyclopedia of AIDS; Hope, T.J., Stevenson, M., Richman, D., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  27. UNAIDS. Fact Sheet—Latest Statistics on the Status of the AIDS Epidemic; UNAIDS: Geneve, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  28. Esbjornsson, J.; Mansson, F.; Kvist, A.; da Silva, Z.J.; Andersson, S.; Fenyo, E.M.; Isberg, P.E.; Biague, A.J.; Lindman, J.; Palm, A.A.; et al. Long-term follow-up of HIV-2-related AIDS and mortality in Guinea-Bissau: A prospective open cohort study. Lancet HIV 2018, 6, e25–e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Matheron, S.; Pueyo, S.; Damond, F.; Simon, F.; Lepretre, A.; Campa, P.; Salamon, R.; Chene, G.; Brun-Vezinet, F. Factors associated with clinical progression in HIV-2 infected-patients: The French ANRS cohort. AIDS 2003, 17, 2593–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. de Mendoza, C.; Requena, S.; Caballero, E.; Cabezas, T.; Penaranda, M.; Amengual, M.J.; Saez, A.; Lozano, A.B.; Ramos, J.M.; Soriano, V. Antiretroviral treatment of HIV-2 infection. Future Virol. 2017, 12, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, P.F.; Blair, W.; Wang, T.; Spicer, T.; Guo, Q.; Zhou, N.; Gong, Y.F.; Wang, H.G.; Rose, R.; Yamanaka, G.; et al. A small molecule HIV-1 inhibitor that targets the HIV-1 envelope and inhibits CD4 receptor binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 11013–11018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Meanwell, N.A.; Krystal, M.R.; Nowicka-Sans, B.; Langley, D.R.; Conlon, D.A.; Eastgate, M.D.; Grasela, D.M.; Timmins, P.; Wang, T.; Kadow, J.F. Inhibitors of HIV-1 Attachment: The Discovery and Development of Temsavir and its Prodrug Fostemsavir. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 62–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, T.; Zhang, Z.; Wallace, O.B.; Deshpande, M.; Fang, H.; Yang, Z.; Zadjura, L.M.; Tweedie, D.L.; Huang, S.; Zhao, F.; et al. Discovery of 4-benzoyl-1-[(4-methoxy-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)oxoacetyl]-2-(R)-methylpiperazine (BMS-378806): A novel HIV-1 attachment inhibitor that interferes with CD4-gp120 interactions. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 4236–4239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sarfo, F.S.; Bibby, D.F.; Schwab, U.; Appiah, L.T.; Clark, D.A.; Collini, P.; Phillips, R.; Green, I.; Dittmar, M.T.; Chadwick, D.R. Inadvertent non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based antiretroviral therapy in dual HIV-1/2 and HIV-2 seropositive West Africans: A retrospective study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009, 64, 667–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Drylewicz, J.; Eholie, S.; Maiga, M.; Zannou, D.M.; Sow, P.S.; Ekouevi, D.K.; Peterson, K.; Bissagnene, E.; Dabis, F.; Thiebaut, R.; et al. First-year lymphocyte T CD4+ response to antiretroviral therapy according to the HIV type in the IeDEA West Africa collaboration. AIDS 2010, 24, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ntemgwa, M.L.; d’Aquin Toni, T.; Brenner, B.G.; Camacho, R.J.; Wainberg, M.A. Antiretroviral drug resistance in human immunodeficiency virus type 2. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 3611–3619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Tzou, P.L.; Descamps, D.; Rhee, S.Y.; Raugi, D.N.; Charpentier, C.; Taveira, N.; Smith, R.A.; Soriano, V.; de Mendoza, C.; Holmes, S.P.; et al. Expanded Spectrum of Antiretroviral-Selected Mutations in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 221, 1962–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Moranguinho, I.; Taveira, N.; Bartolo, I. Antiretroviral Treatment of HIV-2 Infection: Available Drugs, Resistance Pathways, and Promising New Compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Khare, B.; Kuhn, R.J. The Japanese Encephalitis Antigenic Complex Viruses: From Structure to Immunity. Viruses 2022, 14, 2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schuh, A.J.; Ward, M.J.; Leigh Brown, A.J.; Barrett, A.D. Dynamics of the emergence and establishment of a newly dominant genotype of Japanese encephalitis virus throughout Asia. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 4522–4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Adamson, C.S.; Chibale, K.; Goss, R.J.M.; Jaspars, M.; Newman, D.J.; Dorrington, R.A. Antiviral drug discovery: Preparing for the next pandemic. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 3647–3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, C.; Chen, X.; Hu, J.; Jiang, D.; Cai, D.; Li, Y. A Recombinant Genotype I Japanese Encephalitis Virus Expressing a Gaussia Luciferase Gene for Antiviral Drug Screening Assay and Neutralizing Antibodies Detection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tannous, B.A.; Kim, D.E.; Fernandez, J.L.; Weissleder, R.; Breakefield, X.O. Codon-optimized Gaussia luciferase cDNA for mammalian gene expression in culture and in vivo. Mol. Ther. 2005, 11, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Anderson, C.R.; Downs, W.G.; Wattley, G.H.; Ahin, N.W.; Reese, A.A. Mayaro virus: A new human disease agent. II. Isolation from blood of patients in Trinidad, B.W.I. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1957, 6, 1012–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Levi, L.I.; Vignuzzi, M. Arthritogenic Alphaviruses: A Worldwide Emerging Threat? Microorganisms 2019, 7, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Diagne, C.T.; Bengue, M.; Choumet, V.; Hamel, R.; Pompon, J.; Missé, D. Mayaro Virus Pathogenesis and Transmission Mechanisms. Pathogens 2020, 9, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, Y.C.; Lucke, A.C.; Lopez-Camacho, C.; Kummerer, B.M.; Reyes-Sandoval, A. Development of Viral-Vectored Vaccines and Virus Replicon Particle-Based Neutralisation Assay against Mayaro Virus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taveira, N. Antivirals and Vaccines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210315

AMA Style

Taveira N. Antivirals and Vaccines. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(12):10315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taveira, Nuno. 2023. "Antivirals and Vaccines" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 12: 10315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop