Next Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Effect of Ocimum gratissimum L. Essential Oil on Shewanella putrefaciens: Insights Based on the Cell Membrane and External Structure
Previous Article in Journal
MetaSpot: A General Approach for Recognizing the Reactive Atoms Undergoing Metabolic Reactions Based on the MetaQSAR Database
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enzymatic Hydrolysis Optimization for Preparation of Sea Cucumber (Holothuria scabra) Hydrolysate with an Antiproliferative Effect on the HepG2 Liver Cancer Cell Line and Antioxidant Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibition and Molecular Docking Study of Meroterpenoids Isolated from Brown Alga, Sargassum macrocarpum

1
National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Seocheon 33662, Republic of Korea
2
Jeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Jeju 63349, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 11065; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311065
Submission received: 22 May 2023 / Revised: 16 June 2023 / Accepted: 19 June 2023 / Published: 4 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biologically Active Compounds from Marine Organisms)

Abstract

:
Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) is an important blood pressure regulator. In this study, we aimed to investigate the ACE-inhibitory effects of meroterpenoids isolated from the brown alga, Sargassum macrocarpum, and the molecular mechanisms underlying ACE inhibition. Four fractions of S. macrocarpum were prepared using hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and water as solvents and analyzed for their potential ACE-inhibitory effects. The chloroform fraction showed the strongest ACE-inhibitory effect, with an IC50 value of 0.18 mg/mL. Three meroterpenoids, sargachromenol, 7-methyl sargachromenol, and sargaquinoic acid, were isolated from the chloroform fraction. Meroterpenoids isolated from S. macrocarpum had IC50 values of 0.44, 0.37, and 0.14 mM. The molecular docking study revealed that the ACE-inhibitory effect of the isolated meroterpenoids was mainly attributed to Zn-ion, hydrogen bonds, pi-anion, and pi–alkyl interactions between the meroterpenoids and ACE. These results suggest that S. macrocarpum could be a potential raw material for manufacturing antihypertensive nutraceutical ingredients.

1. Introduction

Hypertension is a chronic health problem related to cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial infarction, arteriosclerosis, and stroke, and is affected by various factors, such as salt intake, smoking, stress, and obesity [1]. Among the processes associated with hypertension, angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE), which is involved in the kallikrein–kinin system (KKS) and renin–angiotensin system (RAS), plays a pivotal role in the development of hypertension [2,3,4]. ACE is a zinc metalloproteinase [5]. It is found in the vascular, heart, lung, and brain tissues [6]. In the KKS, ACE plays an important role in degrading the potent vasodilator bradykinin, while in the RAS, ACE catalyzes the conversion of the potent vasoconstrictor octapeptide angiotensin II (Asp-Arg-Val-Tyr-Ile-His-Pro-Phe) from the inactive decapeptide angiotensin I (Asp-Arg-Val-Tyr-Ile-His-Pro-Phe-His-Leu) [7]. Controlling blood pressure control by inhibiting ACE activity is regarded as a preventive and therapeutic strategy for hypertension. The synthetic ACE inhibitors, including captopril, enalapril, ramipril, and benazepril, are extensively used for the treatment of essential hypertension in humans [6,8,9]. However, these synthetic inhibitors have side effects, such as taste disturbances, skin rashes, and coughing [10,11]. Therefore, studies are focusing on using natural resources as potential ACE-inhibitory agents against hypertension.
Natural resources as alternative treatments for hypertension are gaining attention, and studies on herb-derived compounds are ongoing [12,13]. Marine algae possess various bioactive substances with potential pharmaceutical and nutraceutical properties [13]. Marine algae with bioactive substances differ from terrestrial plants [14]. Their antioxidative [15], antidiabetic [16], antiviral [17], anti-obesity [18], and antihypertensive [19] properties have been previously reported. Among brown algae, Sargassum species contain a variety of active compounds such as sterols, sulfated polysaccharides, polyphenols, meroterpenoids, and terpenoids [20], which possess anti-inflammatory [21], anticancer [22], antimicrobial [23], advanced glycation end product (AGE)-inhibitory [24], and neuroprotective [25] properties. Studies have shown that meroterpenoids contain sargachromenol, sargaquinoic acid, marcrocarquinoids A-C, and tuberatolide B, which possess biological activities [20,26]. Despite the potential use of the functional properties of meroterpenoids, to date, to the best of our knowledge, no study has reported their ACE-inhibitory effects and molecular mechanisms.
This study aimed to isolate meroterpenoids from the brown alga, Sargassum macrocarpum based on the analytical data results and evaluate their ACE-inhibitory effects and the molecular mechanism underlying ACE inhibition.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. ACE Inhibitory Effect of S. macrocarpum Extracts

The inhibition of ACE activity can be a useful strategy for improving hypertension. Recently, various marine bioresources were studied for their ability to inhibit ACE activity to explore their applications in improving hypertension. In this study, extracts and five solvent fractions of S. macrocarpum were tested for their potential ACE-inhibitory effects. The 80% aqueous methanol extract of S. macrocarpum inhibited ACE activity in a dose-dependent manner by 6.1, 15.7, 40.7, 62.7, and 74.5% at concentrations of 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/mL, respectively (Figure 1). The IC50 value of the extract against ACE was 0.38 mg/mL. Compared to the findings in a previous study, the ACE inhibitory effects of S. macrocarpum extract were more effective than those of the extracts from other Sargassum species [26]. This indicates that active compounds of different polarities, such as meroterpenoids, might be present in the Sargassum species, particularly in S. macrocarpum. Thus, S. macrocarpum was partitioned with hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, butanol, and water to detect the bioactive compounds, and their ACE-inhibitory effects were evaluated (Figure 2). The chloroform fraction showed the highest ACE-inhibitory effect with the lowest IC50 value 0.18 mg/mL compared to that of the other organic solvent fractions. Previous studies have shown that ACE-inhibitory compounds can be obtained from brown algae, such as Ishige sinicola [19], Ecklonia cava [27], and Turbinaria ornata [28]. Compared to the findings in our previous study, the ACE-inhibitory effect of the chloroform fraction of S. macrocarpum was more effective than that of the extract and chloroform fraction from E. cava [27].

2.2. Isolation and Identification of the Compounds

Next, the chloroform fraction was subjected to silica gel electrophoresis and MPLC. Finally, the compounds in this fraction were isolated using preparative HPLC and identified as meroterpenoids based on a comparison between the NMR spectroscopic data and previous literature [29,30]. Sargachromenol (1): brown oils; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH 6.46 (1H, brs, H-7), 6.30 (1H, brs, H-5), 6.22 (1H, d, J = 9.8 Hz, H-4), 5.96 (1H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, H-7′), 5.55 (1H, d, J = 9.8 Hz, H-3), 5.12 (1H, t, J = 6.6 Hz, H-3′), 5.07 (1H, t, J = 6.4 Hz, H-11′), 2.58 (2H, m, H-6′), 2.24 (2H, m, H-9′), 2.11 (3H, s, H-18′), 2.11 (2H, m, H-2′ and H-10′), 2.05 (2H, m, H-5′), 1.65 (3H, s, H-13′), 1.64 (2H, m, H-1′), 1.56 (3H, m, H-14′), 1.55 (3H, m, H-16′), 1.33 (3H, m, H-17′) (Figure S1); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δC 173.4 (C-15′), 148.7 (C-6), 145.8 (C-7′), 144.9 (C-8a), 134.5 (C-4′), 132.4 (C-12′), 130.8 (C-3), 130.7 (C-8′), 126.5 (C-8), 125.0 (C-3′), 123.6 (C-11′), 123.1 (C-4), 121.5 (C-4a), 117.2 (C-7), 110.5 (C-5), 77.9 (C-2), 40.9 (C-1′), 39.2 (C-5′), 34.7 (C-9′), 28.3 (C-6′), 28.0 (C-10′), 26.0 (C-17′), 25.8 (C-13′), 22.8 (C-2′), 17.9 (C-14′), 15.9 (C-18′), 15.7 (C-16′) (Figure S2); HRESIMS: m/z 423.2539 C27H35O4 [M-H] (calcd for C27H35O4, 423.2535) (Figure S3).
7-methyl sargachromenol (2): brown oils; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH 6.29 (1H, s, H-5), 6.21 (1H, d, J = 9.7 Hz, H-4), 5.97 (1H, s, H-7′), 5.52 (1H, d, J = 9.7 Hz, H-3), 5.11 (1H, t, J = 6.8 Hz, H-3′), 5.06 (1H, t, J = 6.7 Hz, H-11′), 2.58 (2H, m, H-6′), 2.23 (2H, m, H-9′), 2.12 (2H, m, H-2′ and H-10′), 2.11 (3H, s, H-19′), 2.10 (3H, s, H-18′), 2.05 (2H, m, H-5′), 1.65 (2H, m, H-1′), 1.65 (3H, s, H-13′), 1.56 (3H, s, H-14′), 1.55 (3H, s, H-16′), 1.33 (3H, s, H-17′) (Figure S4); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δC 172.6 (C-15′), 147.0 (C-6), 145.7 (C-7′), 144.9 (C-8a), 134.5 (C-4′), 132.4 (C-12′), 130.6 (C-8′), 130.0 (C-3), 128.3 (C-8), 125.2 (C-3′), 123.7 (C-11′), 123.6 (C-7), 123.0 (C-4), 118.9 (C-4a), 110.0 (C-5), 77.8 (C-2), 40.9 (C-1′), 39.2 (C-5′), 34.7 (C-9′), 28.3 (C-6′), 28.0 (C-10′), 26.0 (C-17′), 25.8 (C-13′), 22.8 (C-2′), 17.9 (C-14′), 15.9 (C-16′), 12.3 (C-19′), 11.8 (C-18′) (Figure S5); HRESIMS: m/z 437.2691 C28H37O4 [M-H] (calcd for C28H37O4, 437.2691) (Figure S6).
Sargaquinoic acid (3): brown oils; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH 6.53 (1H, s, H-5), 6.44 (1H, s, H-1), 5.98 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, H-10′), 5.13 (1H, m, H-2′), 5.11 (1H, m, H-6′), 5.07 (1H, m, H-14′), 3.11 (2H, m, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1′), 2.58 (2H, m, H-9′), 2.24 (2H, d, J = 7.4 Hz, H-12′), 2.10 (2H, m, H-13′), 2.07 (2H, m, H-5′), 2.05 (2H, m, H-4′ and H-8′), 2.04 (3H, s, H-21′), 1.65 (3H, s, H-17′), 1.60 (3H, s, H-20′), 1.58 (3H, s, H-19′), 1.56 (3H, s, H-16′) (Figure S7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δC 188.3 (C-3), 188.2 (C-6), 172.7 (C-18′), 148.7 (C-2), 146.1 (C-4), 145.6 (C-10′), 140.0 (C-3′), 134.8 (C-7′), 133.3 (C-5), 132.49 (C-1), 132.44 (C-15′), 130.7 (C-11′), 124.6 (C-6′), 123.6 (C-14′), 118.1 (C-2′), 39.7 (C-4′), 39.2 (C-8′), 34.7 (C-12′), 28.4 (C-9′), 28.0 (C-13′), 27.7 (C-1′), 26.5 (C-5′), 25.9 (C-17′), 17.9 (C-16′), 16.3 (C-21′), 16.2 (C-19′), 16.1 (C-20′) (Figure S8); HRESIMS: m/z 423.2534 C27H35O4 [M-H] (calcd for C27H35O4, 423.2535) (Figure S9).

2.3. Inhibitory Effects and Molecular Docking of Compounds Isolated from S. macrocarpum to ACE

Three meroterpenoids, sargachromenol, 7-methyl sargachromenol, and sargaquinoic acid, with different chemical structures and molecular weights were isolated. The ACE-inhibitory effects of the three meroterpenoids are shown in Figure 3. Among the meroterpenoids isolated, sargaquinoic acid showed the highest effect compared to that of the other meroterpenoids. In terms of the activation of the ACE-inhibitory effect, the lowest IC50 value was observed for sargaquinoic acid at a concentration of 0.14 mM, and IC50 value of sargaquinoic acid was 3-fold lower than that of sargachromenol, which was the weakest inhibitor among the three meroterpenoids. It has previously been found that plant phenolic compounds such as quercetin, kaempferol, rutin, apigenin, epicatechin, phloretin, and resveratrol exhibit ACE-inhibitory effects and have IC50 values of 0.415, 0.512, 0.472, 0.667, 1.381, 1.110, and 0.970 mM, respectively [31]. Additionally, they are ACE-inhibitory compounds derived from marine plants. The isolated ACE-inhibitory compounds are phloroglucinol (IC50 value = 2.57 mM), triphlorethol-A (IC50 value = 2.01 mM), eckol (IC50 value = 2.27 mM), dieckol (IC50 value = 1.47 mM), and eckstolonol (IC50 value = 2.95 mM) [27]. In this study, the isolated meroterpenoids exhibited stronger or similar effects, but demonstrated weaker effects than that of several ACE-inhibitory peptides derived from various natural plants. The identified ACE-inhibitory peptides are Asp-Glu-Asn-Ser-Lys-Phe (IC50 value = 0.1 mM) from Terminalla chebula tree [32], Tyr-Ser-Lys (IC50 value = 0.076 mM) from rice bran [33], Val-Ser-Gly-Ala-Gly-Arg-Tyr (IC50 value = 0.0086 mM) from bitter melon seed [34], and Lys-Glu-Asp-Asp-Glu-Glu-Glu-Glu-Gln-Glu-Glu-Glu (IC50 value = 0.064 mM) from Pea [35]. A previous study demonstrated that meroterpenoids isolated from S. macrocarpum exhibited a significantly weaker effect than that of lisinopril (IC50 value = 2.2 nM), enalapril (IC50 value = 6.3 nM), and captopril (IC50 value = 6.3 nM), currently the most widely used synthetic ACE-inhibitor [36]. Diet therapy through natural products with fewer undesirable side-effects and lower cost is safer than medicines. Therefore, the natural products may become an important component in the initial treatment of patients with mild hypertension. However, the stable forms of bioactive molecules and their specific doses in humans are difficult to determine and commercialize. It is thought that additional studies on the bioavailability of natural products and studies on the effects that may occur when taken together with commercial ACE inhibitor are needed. To explore the structural–functional interactions between the meroterpenoids (sargachromenol, 7-methyl sargachromenol, and sargaquinoic acid) and ACE, computational molecular docking was performed using Discovery Studio 2022. The C-terminal tripeptide of substrate has been reported to affect ACE binding [37,38]. Additionally, the three marine active site pockets (S1, S’1, and S’2) of ACE play a crucial role in the interaction between the inhibitor and ACE [37]. S1 (antepenultimate) contains ALA354, GLU384, and TYR523 residues; S’1 contains GLU162; and S2 contains GLN281, HIS353, HIS513, and LYS511 [39]. Lisinopril, an ACE inhibitor used for the clinical treatment of hypertension, interacts with the S1 pocket (ALA354 and GLU384) and S2 pocket (HIS353) [37]. The most stable meroterpenoid bond with ACE was obtained, and the 2D and 3D structures are shown in Figure 4. Among the meroterpenoids, sargachromenol and 7-methyl-sargachromenol do exist as R- and S-isomers, and structures of meroterpenoids are described in Table 1. Sargachromenol R-isomer interacted with GLU376 (conventional hydrogen bond interaction), ALA354 (alkyl interaction), VAL379 (alkyl interaction), VAL380 (alkyl interaction), VAL518 (alkyl interaction), PHE527 (Pi-alkyl interaction), HIS353 (Pi-alkyl interaction), HIS383 (Pi-alkyl and carbon hydrogen bond interaction), HIS513 (Pi-alkyl interaction), PHE457 (Pi-alkyl interaction), and TYR523 (Pi-alkyl interaction) (Figure 4A). Sargachromenol S-isomer interacted with ALA354 (alkyl interaction), VAL380 (alkyl interaction), VAL518 (alkyl interaction), HIS353 (Pi-alkyl interaction), HIS383 (carbon hydrogen bond interaction), HIS513 (Pi-alkyl interaction), HIS387 (Pi-alkyl and Pi-anion interaction), and TRP279 (Pi-alkyl interaction) (Figure 4B). 7-methyl-sargachromenol R-isomer interacted with TYR523 (conventional hydrogen bond interaction), GLU376 (conventional hydrogen bond interaction), VAL380 (alkyl interaction), LEU161 (alkyl interaction), ALA354 (alkyl interaction), HIS353 (Pi-alkyl interaction), PHE512 (Pi-alkyl interaction), and TRP279 (Pi-alkyl interaction) (Figure 4C). 7-methyl-sargachromenol S-isomer interacted with TYR523 (conventional hydrogen bond interaction), LEU161 (alkyl interaction), HIS353 (Pi-alkyl interaction), HIS387 (Pi-alkyl interaction), HIS410 (Pi-alkyl interaction), HIS513 (Pi-alkyl interaction), PHE512 (Pi-alkyl interaction), TRP279 (Pi-alkyl interaction), ALA354 (alkyl interaction), GLU411 (carbon hydrogen bond interaction), CYS352 (alkyl interaction), and CYS370 (alkyl interaction) (Figure 4D). In the case of sargaquinoic acid, the binding site was formed by the following: CYS370 (conventional hydrogen bond interaction), ALA354 (alkyl interaction), VAL380 (alkyl interaction), VAL518 (alkyl interaction), PRO163 (alkyl interaction), HIS353 (Pi-alkyl interaction), HIS383 (Pi-alkyl interaction and carbon hydrogen bond), HIS387 (Pi-alkyl interaction), PHE512 (Pi-alkyl interaction), TYR523 (Pi-alkyl interaction), GLU162 (Pi-anion), ASP377 (Pi-anion), and SER355 (carbon hydrogen bond interaction) (Figure 4E). The molecular docking analysis indicated that the computed binding energy (kcal/mol) values of sargachromenol R-isomer, sargachromenol S-isomer, 7-methyl sargachromenol R-isomer, 7-methyl sargachromenol S-isomer, and sargaquinoic acid with ACE were −198.931, −190.337, −218.374, −227.35 and −248.169 kcal/mol, respectively (Table 2). Among the ACE active sites, Zn2+ is involved in ACE activation and binds to the ACE residues GLU411, HIS383, and HIS387 [40]. The molecular docking study revealed that meroterpenoids did interact directly with Zn2+ at the active site that sargachromenol R-isomer forms with S1 (ALA354 and TYR523) and S2 (HIS353 and HIS513) active site pockets and that sargachromenol S-isomer forms with S1 (ALA354) and S2 (HIS353, and HIS513) active site pockets. In the case of 7-methyl sargachromenol, R-isomer forms with S1 (TYR523) and S2 (HIS353) active site pockets of ACE, and S-isomer forms with S1 (ALA 354, and TYR523) and S2 (HIS353, and HIS513) active site pockets of ACE. In addition, sargaquinoic acid forms an active site with the S1 (ALA354, TYR523), S’1 (GLU162), and S2 (HIS353) active site pockets of ACE.
In conclusion, among the various organic solvent fractions, the chloroform fraction exhibited the highest ACE inhibitory effect. Three meroterpenoids, sargachromenol, 7-methyl sargachromenol, and sargaquinoic acid, having ACE-inhibitory effects were isolated, with IC50 values 0.44, 0.37, and 0.14 mM, respectively. Among the three meropterpenoids, sargachromenol and 7-methyl-sargachromenol do exist as R- and S-isomers, and molecular docking studies of the respective other isomers were performed. These other isomers showed the similar docking poses and binding energies with those of isomers. Molecular docking studies revealed that these meroterpenoids in the ACE active site contributed to the stabilization of the docking complex, and it was confirmed that sargaquioic acid contributed the most to stabilization. These findings provide a partial molecular explanation for the ACE-inhibitory properties of meroterpenoids isolated from S. macrocarpum. Moreover, meroterpenoids are promising for the discovery of potential candidates for the future industrial production of functional foods.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

S. macrocarpum was collected from Jeju Island, South Korea. The alga was washed three times with tap water to remove salt and epiphytes attached to the surface, followed by careful rinsing with fresh water. The algae were stored in a medical refrigerator at −80 °C. Frozen algae were lyophilized and homogenized using a grinder prior to extraction. The ACE assay kit (ACE kit-WST) was obtained from Dojindo Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan).

3.2. Extraction and Isolation of Compounds

The dried S. macrocarpum powder was extracted with 80% aqueous methanol at room temperature, and the liquid layer was obtained via filtration. The filtrate was evaporated to obtain the methanol extract, which was suspended in distilled water and partitioned with hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and butanol. The chloroform fraction exhibited a stronger ACE-inhibitory effect than the other fractions. Thus, the compounds were extracted from the chloroform fraction using a silica gel column and medium-pressure liquid chromatography (Selekt MPLC system, biotase, Uppsala, Sweden). Finally, the compounds were purified using preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (Nextra prep-HPLC, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and the structures of the compounds were identified by comparing the nuclear magnetic resonance (Varian VNMRS 500 MHz FT-NMR spectrometer, Varian, Pala Alto, CA, USA) spectral data and high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (SCIEX X500R Q-TOF LC-MS/MS spectrometer, SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) analysis results with those in the existing literature.

3.3. Determining the ACE Inhibitory Activity

The ACE-inhibitory activities of the extract, fractions, and compounds were determined using an ACE kit-WST (Dojindo Laboratories). The assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Model 550, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). IC50 value was defined as the concentration of extract and fractions (mg/mL), and compounds (µM) required for 50% reduction of the ACE activity.

3.4. Three-Dimensional (3D) Structure of the Proteins and Compounds

Molecular docking was performed using CDOCKER and Calculate Binding Energies tools in Discovery Studio 2022 (Biovia, San Diego, CA, USA) to assess the binding positions of meroterpenoids within the active site of ACE. A docking mechanism based on CHARMm [41] was used to execute the CDOCKER docking protocol. The docking of marine aldehyde derivatives to the ACE was performed as follows: (1) a two-dimensional (2D) structure was converted to a 3D structure, (2) proteins were prepared, and the binding sites were defined, and (3) the compounds were docked [42]. The ACE-binding pocket was defined as the area from the center of the active site up to a radius of 11.2 Å. The binding site and ligand were allowed to move freely during the docking. Water molecules were removed from the protein in the flexible docking process because the fixed water molecules might alter the generation of the ligand–receptor complex. After the removal of water molecules, hydrogen atoms were attached to the protein. Ligand binding affinity was assessed for all complexes by applying the CHARMm force field to the interaction energy. Based on CDOCKER’s interaction energy, the distinct conformational positions for each molecule were identified and examined. The binding energies of the small-molecule protein complexes were calculated using the Calculated Binding Energies tool and used to select candidate compounds. The docking positions of the selected compounds to ACE are expressed as 2D and 3D crystal structures.

3.5. Statistical Analyses

Data are presented as mean ± standard error. Statistical comparisons of the mean values were performed using analysis of variance, followed by Duncan’s multiple-range test using the SPSS software (Version 21). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241311065/s1.

Author Contributions

S.-C.K.: data curation, investigation, and writing—original draft preparation. J.-Y.K.: data curation, and methodology. J.M.L.: data curation, and methodology. M.-J.Y.: formal analysis, and investigation. H.-S.K.: formal analysis, and investigation. G.-W.O.: formal analysis, and investigation. C.H.K.: formal analysis, and investigation. N.K.: formal analysis, and methodology. S.-J.H.: writing—review and editing. K.B.: writing—review and editing. D.-S.L.: designed the research, writing—review and editing, and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK) Research Program 2023M00500.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wei, D.; Fan, Y.L.; Xu, Y. Identification of water-soluble peptides in distilled spent grain and its angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity based on UPLC-Q-TOF-MS and proteomics analysis. Food Chem. 2021, 353, 129521. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alper, A.B.; Calhoun, D.A.; Oparil, S. Hypertension. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences; Nature Publishing Group: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Unger, T. The role of rennin–angiotensin system in the development of cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2022, 89, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Je, J.Y.; Park, J.Y.; Jung, W.K.; Park, P.J.; Kim, S.K. Isolation of angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor from fermented oyster sauce, Crassostrea gigas. Food Chem. 2005, 90, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, W.; McKinnie, S.M.; Farhan, M.; Paul, M.; McDonald, T.; McLean, B.; Llorens-Cortes, C.; Hazra, S.; Murray, A.G.; Vederas, J.C.; et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 metabolizes and partially inactivates pyrapelin-13 and apelin-17: “Physiological effects in the cardiovascular system”. Hypertension 2016, 68, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Je, J.Y.; Park, P.J.; Byun, H.G.; Jung, W.K.; Kim, S.K. Angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide derived from the sauce of fermented blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 1624–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Daskaya-Dikmen, C.; Yuceteoe, A.; Karbancioglu-Guler, F.; Daskaya, H.; Ozcelik, B. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides from plants. Nutrients 2017, 9, 316. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ko, S.C.; Kang, N.; Kim, E.A.; Kang, M.C.; Lee, S.H.; Kang, S.M.; Lee, J.B.; Jeon, B.T.; Kim, S.K.; Park, S.J.; et al. A novel angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide from a marine Chlorella ellipsoidea and its antihypertensive effect in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 2005–2011. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ko, S.C.; Lee, J.K.; Byun, H.G.; Lee, S.C.; Jeon, Y.J. Purification of characterization of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptide from enzymatic hydrolysates of Styela clava flesh tissue. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 34–40. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kato, H.; Suzuki, T. Bradykinin-potentiating peptides from the venom of Agkistrodon halys blomhoffii: Isolation of five bradykinin potentiators B and C. Toxicon 1972, 10, 313. [Google Scholar]
  11. Thurman, J.M.; Schrier, R.W. Comparative effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on blood pressure and the kidney. Am. J. Med. 2003, 114, 588–598. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chakrabortya, R.; Roy, S. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors from plants: A review of their diversity, modes of action, prospects, and concerns in the management of diabetes-centric complications. J. Integr. Med. 2021, 19, 478–492. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee, S.H.; Ko, S.C.; Kang, M.C.; Lee, D.H.; Jeon, Y.J. Octaphlorethol A, a marine algae product, exhibits antidiabetic effects in type 2 diabetic mice by activating AMP-activated kinase and upregulating the expression of glucose transporter 4. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 91, 58–64. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ko, S.C.; Ding, Y.; Kim, J.; Ye, B.R.; Kim, E.A.; Jung, W.K.; Heo, S.J.; Lee, S.H. Bromophenol (5-bromo-3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde) isolated from red alga Polysiphonia morrowii inhibits adipogenesis by regulating expression of adipogenic transcription factors and AMP-activated protein kinase activation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 737–744. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Lee, S.H.; Kang, S.M.; Ko, S.C.; Kang, M.C.; Jeon, Y.J. Octaphlorethol A, a novel phenolic compound isolated from Ishige foliacea, protects against streptozotocin-induced pancreatic β cell damage by reducing oxidative stress and apoptosis. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 59, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Lee, S.H.; Kang, S.M.; Ko, S.C.; Lee, D.H.; Jeon, Y.J. Octaphlorethol A, a novel phenolic compound isolated from a brown alga, Ishige foliacea, increases glucose transporter 4-mediated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 420, 576–581. [Google Scholar]
  17. Besednova, N.; Andryukov, B.G.; Zaporozhets, T.S.; Kryzhanovsky, S.P.; Fedyanina, L.N.; Kuznetsova, T.A.; Zvyagintseva, T.N.; Shchelkanov, M.Y. Antiviral effects of polyphenols from marine algae. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 200. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kang, M.C.; Kang, N.; Ko, S.C.; Kim, Y.B.; Jeon, Y.J. Anti-obesity effects of seaweeds of Jeju Island on the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and obese mice fed a high-fat diet. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 90, 36–44. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ko, S.C.; Jung, W.K.; Kang, S.M.; Lee, S.H.; Kang, M.C.; Heo, S.J.; Kang, K.H.; Kim, Y.T.; Park, S.J.; Jeong, Y.; et al. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and nitric oxide (NO)-mediated antihypertensive effect of octaphlorethol A isolated from Ishige sinicola: In vitro molecular mechanism and in vivo SHR model. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 289–299. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rushdi, M.I.; Abdel-Raham, I.A.M.; Saber, H.; Attia, E.Z.; Abdelraheem, W.M.; Madkour, H.A.; Hassan, H.M.; Elmaidomy, A.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Pharmacological and natural products diversity of the brown algae genus Sargassum. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 24951. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, E.A.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.; Oh, J.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Yoon, W.J.; Kang, D.H.; Heo, S.J. Tuberatolide B is isolated from Sargassum macrocarpum inhibited LPS-stimulated infammatory response via MAPKs and NF-κB signaling pathway in RAW 264.7 cells and zebrafsh model. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 52, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Choi, Y.K.; Kim, J.; Lee, K.M.; Choi, Y.J.; Ye, B.R.; Kim, M.S.; Ko, S.G.; Lee, S.H.; Kang, D.H.; Heo, S.J. Tuberatolide B suppresses cancer progression by promoting ROS–mediated inhibition of STAT3 signaling. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kamei, Y.; Sueyoshi, M.; Hayashi, K.; Terada, R.; Nozaki, H. The novel anti-Propiobacterium acnes compound, Sargafuran, found in the marine brown alga Sargassum macrocarpum. J. Antibiot. 2009, 62, 259–263. [Google Scholar]
  24. Niwa, H.; Kurimoto, S.; Kubota, T.; Sekiguchi, M. Macrocarquinoids A–C, new meroterpenoids from Sargassum macrocarpum. J. Nat. Med. 2021, 75, 194–200. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tsang, C.K.; Kamei, Y. Sargaquinoic acid supports the survival of neuronal PC12D cells in a growth factor-independent manner. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 488, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  26. Caijiao, C.; Leshan, H.; Mengke, Y.; Lei, S.; Miansong, Z.; Yaping, S.; Changheng, L.; Xinfeng, B.; Xue, L.; Xin, L.; et al. Comparative studies on antioxidant, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory and anticoagulant activities of the methanol extracts from two brown algae (Sargassum horneri and Sargassum thunbergii). Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2021, 47, 380–387. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wijesinghe, W.A.J.P.; Ko, S.C.; Jeon, Y.J. Effect of phlorotannins isolated from Ecklonia cava on angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2021, 5, 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chakraborty, K.; Dhara, S. Spirornatas A-C from brown alga Turbinaria ornata: Anti-hypertensive spiroketals attenuate angiotensin-I converting enzyme. Phytochemistry 2022, 195, 113024. [Google Scholar]
  29. Seo, Y.; Park, K.E.; Nam, T.J. Isolation of a new chromene from the brown alga Sargassum thunbergii. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2007, 28, 1831–1833. [Google Scholar]
  30. Reddy, P.; Urban, S. Meroditerpenoids from the southern Australian marine brown alga Sargassum fallax. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Shukor, N.A.; Camp, J.V.; Gonzales, G.B.; Staljanssens, D.; Struijs, K.; Zotti, M.J.; Rases, K.; Smagghe, G. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory effects by plant phenolic compounds: A study of structure activity relationships. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 11832–11839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sornwatana, T.; Bangphoomi, K.; Roytrakul, S.; Wetprasit, N.; Choowongkomon, K.; Ratanapo, S. Chebulin: Terminalia Chebula Retz. Fruit-derived peptide with angiotensin-Iconverting enzyme inhibitory activity. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2015, 62, 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Fu, X.; Li, S.; Wei, J. A novel antioxidant and ACE-inhibitory peptide from rice bran protein: Biochemical characterization and molecular docking study. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Priyanto, A.D.; Doerksen, R.J.; Chang, C.I.; Sung, W.C.; Widjanarko, S.B.; Kusnadi, J.; Lin, Y.C.; Wang, T.C.; Hsu, J.L. Screening, discovery, and characterization of angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitory peptides derived from proteolytic hydrolysate of bitter melon seed Proteins. J. Proteom. 2015, 128, 424–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jakubczyk, A.; Karas, M.; Baraniak, B.; Pietrzak, M. The impact of fermentation and in vitro digestion on formation angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) Inhibitory peptides from pea proteins. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 3774–3780. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Manoharan, S. Is it still relevant to discover new ACE inhibitors from natural products? YES, but only with comprehensive approaches to address the patients’ real problems: Chronic dry cough and angioedema. Molecules 2023, 28, 4532. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Rawendra, R.D.; Aisha Chang, C.I.; Aulanni’am Chen, H.H.; Huang, T.C.; Hsu, J.L. A novel angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory peptide derived from proteolytic digest of Chinese soft-shelled turtle egg white proteins. J. Proteom. 2013, 94, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, J.K.; Jeon, J.K.; Byun, H.G. Antihypertensive effect of novel angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitory peptide from chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) skin in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 7, 381–389. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu, Q.; Jia, J.; Yan, H.; Du, J.; Gui, Z. A novel angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide from gastro intestinal protease hydrolysate of silkworm pupa (Bombyx mori) protein: Biochemical characterization and molecular docking study. Peptides 2015, 68, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ko, S.C.; Jang, J.; Ye, B.R.; Kim, M.S.; Choi, I.W.; Park, W.S.; Heo, S.J.; Jung, W.K. Purification and molecular docking study of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides from hydrolysates of marine sponge Stylotella aurantium. Process Biochem. 2017, 54, 180–187. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mesaik, M.A.; Murad, S.; Ismail, Z.; Abdullah, N.R.; Gill, H.K.; Yousaf, M.; Siddiqui, R.A.; Ahmad, A.; Choudhary, M.I. Biological and molecular docking studies on coagulin-H: Human IL-2 novel natural inhibitor. Mol. Immunol. 2006, 43, 1855–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kang, N.; Ko, S.C.; Kim, H.S.; Yang, H.W.; Ahn, G.; Lee, S.C.; Lee, T.G.; Lee, J.S.; Jeon, Y.J. Structural evidence for antihypertensive effect of an antioxidant peptide purified from the edible marine animal styela clava. J. Med. Food 2020, 23, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory effect of extract from Sargassum macrocarpum. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. of triplicate experiments. IC50 value is the concentration of extract required for 50% inhibition.
Figure 1. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory effect of extract from Sargassum macrocarpum. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. of triplicate experiments. IC50 value is the concentration of extract required for 50% inhibition.
Ijms 24 11065 g001
Figure 2. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory effect of fractions from Sargassum macrocarpum extract. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. of triplicate experiments. IC50 value is the concentration of fractions required for 50% inhibition.
Figure 2. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory effect of fractions from Sargassum macrocarpum extract. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. of triplicate experiments. IC50 value is the concentration of fractions required for 50% inhibition.
Ijms 24 11065 g002
Figure 3. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory effect of meroterpenoids from Sargassum macrocarpum. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. of triplicate experiments. IC50 value is the concentration of meroterpenoids required for 50% inhibition.
Figure 3. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory effect of meroterpenoids from Sargassum macrocarpum. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. of triplicate experiments. IC50 value is the concentration of meroterpenoids required for 50% inhibition.
Ijms 24 11065 g003
Figure 4. The docking poses of the meroterpenoid-active site of ACE. The 3D and 2D diagram of the complexes to active site with sargachromenol R-isomer (A), sargachromenol S-isomer (B), 7-methyl sargachromenol R-isomer (C), 7-methyl sargachromenol S-isomer (D), and sargaquinoic acid (E). The active site was expressed as a ribbon model tagging the amino acid. The meroterpenoids are shown as a gray and red stick model, and the binding surface is expressed in terms of hydrogen bonds. The 2D diagram of the meroterpenoids-active site complexes were combined as hydrogen bond or pi bond.
Figure 4. The docking poses of the meroterpenoid-active site of ACE. The 3D and 2D diagram of the complexes to active site with sargachromenol R-isomer (A), sargachromenol S-isomer (B), 7-methyl sargachromenol R-isomer (C), 7-methyl sargachromenol S-isomer (D), and sargaquinoic acid (E). The active site was expressed as a ribbon model tagging the amino acid. The meroterpenoids are shown as a gray and red stick model, and the binding surface is expressed in terms of hydrogen bonds. The 2D diagram of the meroterpenoids-active site complexes were combined as hydrogen bond or pi bond.
Ijms 24 11065 g004aIjms 24 11065 g004bIjms 24 11065 g004c
Table 1. 2D and 3D structure of the meroterpenoids.
Table 1. 2D and 3D structure of the meroterpenoids.
CompoundsStructures
R-sargachromenolIjms 24 11065 i001
S-sargachromenolIjms 24 11065 i002
R-7-methyl sargachromenolIjms 24 11065 i003
S-7-methyl sargachromenolIjms 24 11065 i004
sargaquinoic acidIjms 24 11065 i005
Table 2. The computed binding energy values of the meroterpenoids.
Table 2. The computed binding energy values of the meroterpenoids.
MeroterpenoidsComputed Binding Energy (kacal/mol)
R-Sargachromenol−198.931
S-Sargachromenol−190.337
R-7-methyl sargachromenol−218.374
S-7-methyl sargachromenol−227.35
Sargaquinoic acid−248.169
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ko, S.-C.; Kim, J.-Y.; Lee, J.M.; Yim, M.-J.; Kim, H.-S.; Oh, G.-W.; Kim, C.H.; Kang, N.; Heo, S.-J.; Baek, K.; et al. Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibition and Molecular Docking Study of Meroterpenoids Isolated from Brown Alga, Sargassum macrocarpum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311065

AMA Style

Ko S-C, Kim J-Y, Lee JM, Yim M-J, Kim H-S, Oh G-W, Kim CH, Kang N, Heo S-J, Baek K, et al. Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibition and Molecular Docking Study of Meroterpenoids Isolated from Brown Alga, Sargassum macrocarpum. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(13):11065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ko, Seok-Chun, Ji-Yul Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Mi-Jin Yim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Gun-Woo Oh, Chul Hwan Kim, Nalae Kang, Soo-Jin Heo, Kyunghwa Baek, and et al. 2023. "Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibition and Molecular Docking Study of Meroterpenoids Isolated from Brown Alga, Sargassum macrocarpum" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13: 11065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop