Next Article in Journal
Nicotine and Cytisine Embryotoxicity in the Experimental Zebrafish Model
Next Article in Special Issue
ZmHMA3, a Member of the Heavy-Metal-Transporting ATPase Family, Regulates Cd and Zn Tolerance in Maize
Previous Article in Journal
Deregulation of All-Trans Retinoic Acid Signaling and Development in Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Differentially Expressed Genes in Leaves vs. Roots Subjected to Drought Stress in Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 15
10.3390/ijms241512091
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Dof Transcription Factors and the Heat-Tolerant Function of PeDof-11 in Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis)

by
Ge Chen
1,†,
Yi Xu
2,3,4,†,
Jie Gui
1,
Yongcai Huang
1,
Funing Ma
2,4,
Wenhua Wu
2,3,
Te Han
2,3,
Wenwu Qiu
1,
Liu Yang
1,* and
Shun Song
1,2,4,*
1
Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Guangxi Crop Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology Lab, Nanning 530007, China
2
National Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding/Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute, CATAS/Germplasm Repository of Passiflora, Haikou 571101, China
3
College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210018, China
4
Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, Sanya Research Institute, CATAS, Sanya 572000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12091; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512091
Submission received: 21 June 2023 / Revised: 20 July 2023 / Accepted: 25 July 2023 / Published: 28 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genes Function and Mechanism Identification in Plant Stress Resistance 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Abiotic stress is the focus of passion fruit research since it harms the industry, in which high temperature is an important influencing factor. Dof transcription factors (TFs) act as essential regulators in stress conditions. TFs can protect against abiotic stress via a variety of biological processes. There is yet to be published a systematic study of the Dof (PeDof) family of passion fruit. This study discovered 13 PeDof family members by using high-quality genomes, and the members of this characterization were identified by bioinformatics. Transcriptome sequencing and qRT-PCR were used to analyze the induced expression of PeDofs under high-temperature stress during three periods, in which PeDof-11 was significantly induced with high expression. PeDof-11 was then chosen and converted into yeast, tobacco, and Arabidopsis, with the findings demonstrating that PeDof-11 could significantly respond to high-temperature stress. This research lays the groundwork for a better understanding of PeDof gene regulation under high-temperature stress.

1. Introduction

There are about 520 species of passion fruit, which is a tropical and subtropical fruit [1]. The passion fruits grown in East Asia are mainly two varieties of Passiflora edulis (Sims and Degener), of which Sims is the most common and is the dominant variety, including yellow and purple skins [2]. Passion fruit is widely grown throughout tropical areas with less advanced economies and technological infrastructure, has a great therapeutic value, and is nutritious [3]. Abiotic stress is an important limiting factor for the healthy growth of passion fruit, especially heat stress, which negatively affects the flowering and fruiting process, leading to flower abscission and non-growth of fruit, seriously affecting yields, with ambient temperatures above 40 °C leading to over 80% yield reduction [4]. Therefore, it is particularly important to address the impact of high-temperature stress on passion fruit production, and mining resistance genes, especially transcription factors with powerful functions, and studying their mechanisms of resistance action and applying them to biological breeding is an important avenue.
With respect to the Dof gene, a powerful transcription factor, recent research has demonstrated its important role in enhancing plant abiotic stress functions (heat, salt, and drought). For example, overexpression of the tomato SLDOF25/26 genes can improve the tolerance to drought and salt stress in Arabidopsis [5]. TDDF1, which encodes a tomato Dof protein, has been shown to increase plant salt and drought tolerance [6]. With the overexpression of tomato DOF genes SlCDF1/3 in Arabidopsis, transgenic plants showed enhanced drought and salt resistance [5]. The expression of Dof Daily Fluctuations 1 (TDDF1) improves tolerance to drought and salt stress in tomatoes [6]. Furthermore, the Dof gene plays an important role in controlling the development and germination of seeds and the flowering process of plants [7,8,9]. For example, in grapes, several Dof genes play functional roles during flower, berry, and seed development, indicating their importance in grape growth and development [10]. SlDOF10 plays an important role in plant reproductive development, especially during fruit setting [11].
The Dof gene family has a highly conserved Dof domain at the N-terminus, which is composed of the common core sequence (AT)/AAAG and is organized as a C2C2-type zinc-finger-like motif [12]. More Dof family genes have been researched since the first Dof gene (ZmDof1), and with the advent of genome sequencing, Dof genes have been widely identified in higher plants, such as Arabidopsis (36), rice (30) [13], sorghum (18) [14], and potato (35) [15].
In view of the biological functions of Dof genes, we analyzed the members of the PeDof family with a view to obtaining whether the family is amplified/contracted in passion fruit and preliminarily resolving its relevance to environmental adaptation. The members of the PeDofs and their characteristics were obtained by various biological techniques on the basis of a high-quality genome, transcriptome sequencing, and qRT-PCR analysis of PeDofs expression patterns under high-temperature stress and genetic transformation model organisms to verify the heat-tolerant biological functions of PeDof-11. This lays a good foundation for studying the regulatory mechanism of PeDofs and also provides important genes for passion fruit biobreeding.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of Passion Fruit Dof Members and Information Analysis

In total, 13 passion fruit PeDofs were identified, ranging in length from 738 bp (PeDof-9, 245 amino acids, molecular weight 26,871.18 Da) to 1503 bp (PeDof-7, 500 amino acids, molecular weight 54,769.37 Da), with all PeDof proteins containing Ser, Thr and Tyr phosphorylation sites, and PeDof genes located in the Nucleus (Table 1). The phylogenetic tree (Figure 1A) revealed that PeDofs were divided into three groups, with 3 and 10 members in groups 1 and 3, respectively. Most Dof members were closely homologously clustered in passion fruit with Arabidopsis and rice; e.g., PeDof-13 with AtDof1.7, PeDof-6 with AtDof3.5, PeDof-11 with AtDof4.2, PeDof-9 with AtDof4.7, respectively, showed the closest homology. Chromosomal localization analysis revealed that 13 PeDof genes were scattered on the chromosome (Figure 1B), with PeDof-1/2/3/4 localized in Chr1. Chr3,4,8 contained two PeDofs, and Chr2,6,7 contained one PeDofs, respectively. Protein interaction analysis revealed that the proteins interacting with PeDofs were mainly HSI2 (high-level expression of sugar-inducible gene 2S), ABA1 (abscisic acid 1), and COL5 (constans-like) and so on, and their functions were mostly involved in plant resistance and development, which provided important clues for further functional studies on the regulation of interactions (Figure 1C). Most instances of PeDofs 3D-structure modeling were structurally similar in that they contained the extension chain (red part) (Figure 1D).

2.2. Analysis of the Structures of PeDof Motifs and Promoters

The conserved motifs and UTR (untranslated region) were predicted (Figure 2A). PeDof-2/4 had six motifs, PeDof-12 had five motifs, PeDof-15/11 had two motifs, while PeDof-3/9/10/13 had only one motif, respectively. PeDof members contain CDS and UTR, except PeDof-2/4/6/8/10/11/12/13, which only had introns. PeDof-5/9 only had 5′UTR, and PeDof-1/7 only had 3′UTR. All 13 PeDofs promoter (−2000 bp DNA sequences regions) had TATA and CATA motif structures and contained a large number of cis-acting elements related to abiotic stress and resistance-related hormone responses, such as abscisic acid, salicylic acid, low temperature and light response, MeJA, auxin, gibberellin response elements, etc. (Figure 2B, Table S4). These were the focus of our attention.

2.3. Collinearity Analysis of PeDofs

All genes were displayed on nine chromosomes circle, four collinearity pairs were found, and each PeDof was associated with 1 paralogous gene (Figure 3A). As obtained by interspecific covariance analysis (Figure 3B), 12,406, 3118, 25,224, and 14,638 genes in Arabidopsis, rice, poplar, and grape, respectively, were collinear with genes in passion fruit. Among 13 members, PeDof-4 has homology with the genes (At1G07640.3, At2G28810.1, At2G37590.1, At5G02460.1, OS05T0112200-01, VIT_06s0004g04520.t01, VIT_08s0007g00180.t01, VIT_13s0019g01410.t01, PNT56298, PNT17733, PNT30495, PNT22915, PNT19272). In addition, PeDof-2/4/12 has one homologous gene in Arabidopsis, poplar, and grape, respectively.

2.4. Expression of PeDof in Different Tissues of Passion Fruit and under High-Temperature Stress

We have analyzed the expression of some PeDofs in the leaves, roots, stems, and fruits of passion fruit (Figure 4). Among them, 6 of them were mainly expressed in the fruit (PeDof-1/5/6/10/12/13). PeDof-3/4/7/8/9/11 were mainly expressed in the root. The results showed that each gene was expressed in different parts.
Under high-temperature stress, most PeDof members except PeDof4/5/10/13 could be induced, especially PeDof-11, which is more than 6.7-fold differentially expressed under the stress at 2 h. The qRT-PCR result also verified this finding. Therefore, we also chose this high-expression gene as the research object to further study the relationship between this gene and improving heat tolerance (Figure 5).

2.5. Analysis of PeDof-11 in Different Tissues of Passion Fruit and under High-Temperature Stress

For the high-temperature stress experiment, the pYES2-PeDof-11 and pYES2 empty vectors (control) were translated into INVSC1. The modified yeast grew better at 50 °C when exposed to high temperatures. This shows that PeDof-11 may have a function in high-temperature stress (Figure 6).
We then transiently transformed tobacco with the PeDof-11 promoter (Figure 7). The PeDof-11p-transformed tobacco and the control were both treated with a 42 °C high-temperature stress treatment. As can be seen from the figure, under the control of the PeDof-11 promoter, the GUS staining is the deepest under the high-temperature treatment for 4 h, indicating that the PeDof-11 is induced to express by the high-temperature stress. The findings demonstrate that the gene was substantially induced during the four-hour treatments.
To determine the role of PeDof-11 in the expression of various tissues of Arabidopsis and in heat stress response, we transformed the PeDof-11 promoter and the gene into Arabidopsis, respectively, and two lines were selected with the experiment, separately (Figure 8). The extent of GUS staining reflects the expression of the PeDof gene driven by the PeDof-11 promoter. As shown in Figure 8A, the leaves of transgenic Arabidopsis had the deepest GUS staining. It shows that the gene is expressed mainly in the leaves. The wild-type and transgenic plants (7 days old) grown in 23 °C MS medium were treated at 42 °C for 36 h, and the GUS staining was greater and concentrated mostly in the leaves. We performed a GUS enzyme activity test and discovered that GUS activities are 3.9-fold higher than the control. The Arabidopsis plants (20 days old) grown in an incubator at 23 °C were treated at 45 °C for 8 h. The results showed that the transgenic plants were phenotypically more heat-tolerant than those of the wild type after high-temperature stress and that the transgenic Arabidopsis grew significantly better than the wild type, with higher survival than that of the wild type, after being restored to the normal conditions of 23 °C for 4 days of incubation. The results show that PeDof-11 was induced by high-temperature stress.

3. Discussion

With more and more gene families of species being mined and analyzed, many Dof genes have been cloned. And some studies have shown that Dofs play a role in regulating gene expression in response to abiotic stress, such as drought, cold, and heat stress. However, the identity and function of passion fruit Dofs have remained unknown. In this research, 13 Dof family members were identified in the passion fruit genome and showed possible roles in PeDofs responses to abiotic stresses.

3.1. Identification and Characteristics of PeDof Genes

The Dof gene family is a plant-specific transcription factor family. Members of Dof genes have been discovered in different species since the first Dof gene was discovered in maize [16]. In this research, 13 PeDof genes have been identified. This number is similar to the number of Dof reported in spinach (22) and is lower than that of rice (30) [13], wheat (96) [11], and soybean (78) [6]. This indicates a massive shrinkage of the Dof family in passion fruit, and the 13 preserved members appear to be particularly valuable. The theoretical isoelectric points (pI) of Dof proteins ranged from 4.75 to 9.32; this result is similar to that in spinach [17].
In plants, Dof genes typically form polygenic families. The fundamental driving mechanism in the development of Dof genes is assumed to be repetitive events. In poplars, for example, 49% of PTRD genes were discovered to be localized in segmental and tandem repeat areas [18]. In apples, 57 and 18 MDD genes, respectively, are found in segmental and tandem repeat regions [19]. The cucumber genome contains two pairs of tandem repeats and six pairs of segmental repeats [20]. In this study, there are 28, 25, 19, and 2 connections between PeDof family members and poplar, Arabidopsis, grape, and rice Dof members, respectively.
Exon–intron structural arrangement can reveal evolutionary links within gene families [21]. In the current study, the number of introns in members of the PeDofs ranged from 0 to 2, with most members having no introns, a result similar to that of many other plant species, including pigeonpea, cucumber, poplar, and pear [11,18,20,22].

3.2. Cis-Elements of PeDof Genes

Cis-acting components, such as plant hormones and stress response, play a vital part in the life cycle of plants [17]. Cis-regulatory elements found in the promoters of co-expressed genes are thought to have a role in gene activity regulation. The majority of cis-elements in the PeDof gene family were associated with responses to light, stress response, and hormones (Table S5). The majority of cis-elements found in the SoDof gene family were connected to light response [23]. Passion fruit growth is strongly light-demanding, and the cis-acting element of PeDofs contains a large number of light components, which also provides a basis for conducting studies on the mechanism of PeDof and light response.

3.3. Potential Role of PeDof genes in Different Tissues

The expression profiles of genes under specific conditions are closely related to biological functions [24]. Gene expression in different tissues may be associated with the underlying function of the gene. In general, genes located in fruits, meristems, and other tissues may be involved in the development of organs and tissues. In this study, most of the PeDof genes were distributed in fruits and roots. This predicts that the function of genes may be related to fruit development and stress resistance. In spinach, six SoDofs are expressed at higher levels in flowers than in other tissues, suggesting that they may be involved in reproductive processes such as flowering and fertility through floral organ responses [17].

3.4. The Response of Dof Genes in Abiotic Stresses

Dof genes are linked to abiotic stress tolerance in plants, according to a growing body of studies. For instance, in Brassica napus, the Dof gene family is able to respond to different abiotic stresses [25]. Analysis of the cis-acting elements of CcDofs showed a predominance of abiotic stress response elements, suggesting that these genes may be associated with abiotic stresses [22]. Overexpression of the Dof gene TDDF1 in tomato increased blooming time, and transgenic plants were also more drought and salt tolerant [13]. OsDof27 could improve the heat tolerance of transgenic rice [26]. Overexpression of Dofs (SlCDF1/F3) greatly improved Arabidopsis drought and salt tolerance while also activating other stress-responsive genes including COR15, RD29A, and ERD10 [12]. One of the Arabidopsis Dof genes called CDF3 was highly induced by drought, extreme temperatures, and abscisic acid treatment [27].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of Dofs and Information in Passion Fruit

The PeDof members were analyzed by bioinformatics software, including gene sequence, protein sequence, protein iso-electric point (pI) values and molecular weight (MW), prediction of subcellular localization, gene conserved region analysis, promoter structure, collinearity and protein interaction regulation and so on [3,4,28,29]. The relevant software and websites are listed in Table S1.

4.2. Plant Materials, Transcriptome, and qRT-PCR Analysis

Healthy and virus-free passion fruit seedlings of the purple fruit varieties were chosen. They were grown in the soil under a growth chamber (Panasonic, MLR-352) (30 °C; 200 μmol·m−2·s−1 light intensity; 12-h light/12-h dark cycle; 70% relative humidity) to a height of about 40 cm and with 8–10 functional leaves, which were subjected to high-temperature stress treatments [28]. The seedlings were grown at 45 °C for high-temperature stress treatment, with other conditions unchanged. The plants were subjected to high-temperature stress treatment for transcriptome analysis [3]. The samples from the high-temperature stress treatment were utilized for RNA sequencing. The Biomic Biotechnology company (Beijing, China) was entrusted with sequencing services. In the additional information, the FRKP data of the transcriptome are shown in Table S2. And we have frozen samples of roots, stems, fruits, and leaves for gene expression analysis in passion fruit tissues. The qRT-PCR analysis of PeDof genes was undertaken using suitable equipment (Light 96, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) [29]. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−∆∆Ct method and normalized to the PeDofs. The date of qRT-PCR is shown in Tables S3 and S4.

4.3. Cloning and Vector Construction of PeDof-11 and the Promoter

The full-length cDNA and the promoter fragment of PeDof-11 were amplified by PCR from the passion fruit (purple fruit varieties) and then cloned into the pCAMBIA1304 vector called pCAMBIA1304-PeDof-11 and pCAMBIA1304-PeDof-11p, respectively. pCAMBIA1304-PeDof-11p was used for the tissue specificity and high-temperature stress experiments in the tobacco and Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings (7 days old). pCAMBIA1304-PeDof-11 was used for the high-temperature stress experiments in the Arabidopsis thaliana (30 days old). The pYES2-PeDof-11 vector was used for the yeast experiments.

4.4. Functional Complementation of PeDof-11 in Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)

The INVSc1 strain (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) was transfected with the pYES2-PeDof-11 and the pYES2 vector (control). To perform the yeast complementation assays, the yeast liquid contained pYES2–PeDof-11, and the pYES2 empty vectors were first cultured in SD-Ura liquid medium at 30 °C to an OD600 value of about 1.0. The yeast liquid was diluted with sterile water by factors of 1, 10−1, 10−2, and 10−3, cultivated in SD-Ura liquid medium at 30 °C, and subjected to high-temperature stress (42 °C for 0 h, 12 h, and 24 h) to perform the yeast complementation tests. Three days later, the growth of the yeast was observed. and photos were taken.

4.5. Plant Transformation and High-Temperature Treatment

The Agrobacterium transformed with pCAMBIA1304-PeDof-11p was shaken at 28 °C to OD 600 = 0.8-1.0. Transient expression tests were conducted on two-month-old tobacco leaves. After high-temperature stress treatment (30 °C, 40 °C, 50 °C treated for 2 h), for additional staining tests, leaf discs with a diameter of 0.5 cm were cut off. The 7-day-old transgenic Arabidopsis with pCAMBIA1304-PeDof-11p were treated at 23 °C and 42 °C for 36 h. The T3 generation of 20-day-old transgenic Arabidopsis with pCAMBIA1304-PeDof-11 was treated with the high-temperature treatment. The plants were planted in vermiculite and treated in an incubator under 45 °C under the light condition for 8 h, replaced at 23 °C for 4 d to recover cultivation (200 μmol·m−2·s−1 light intensity; 8-h light/16-h dark cycle; 70% relative humidity), observed the survival rate of seedlings of different. Two lines of pCAMBIA1304-PeDof-11p (L1-p, L2-p) and pCAMBIA1304-PeDof-11 (L1, L2) transgenic Arabidopsis were taken for correlation studies, respectively.

4.6. Detection of GUS Activity

The different tissues of transgenic Arabidopsis with pCAMBIA1304-PeDof-11p, the 7-day-old seedlings, and the transgenic tobacco under normal and high-temperature stress were stained for GUS enzyme activity testing [30].

5. Conclusions

Dofs are widely reported to be related to the abiotic stress resistance of plants. We have identified 13 Dof members from the genome of the passion fruit. Analyses such as the evolutionary tree, structural domains, promoter cis-acting elements, inter-species, and intra-species collinearity were completed. In this research, the transcriptome results of PeDof gene members under high-temperature stress were verified by qRT-PCR, and the results showed that most of the members were induced to express by high-temperature stress. One of the Dof genes (PeDof-11) was highly induced by high-temperature stress. Further testing of this gene revealed that it might improve the capacity of transgenic tobacco, Arabidopsis, and yeast to withstand heat stress. The findings provide a solid platform for future research into the ability of passion fruit to withstand abiotic stressors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241512091/s1.

Author Contributions

Experiments were performed by G.C., J.G., Y.H., F.M., W.W., T.H., W.Q. and L.Y. analyzed the data. S.S. and Y.X. drafted the manuscript. G.C., Y.X., L.Y. and S.S. supervised the experiments and finalized the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Provincial Key R&D Program of Guangxi Province (Science and Technology Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, GuiKeAB23026070), the Municipal Key R&D Program of Nanning City (Nanning Science and Technology Bureau, 20212007), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32260737).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The passion fruit genomic data and raw RNA-sequence data have been deposited in (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/search/?dbId=gwh&q=GWHAZTM00000000), (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/omix/release/OMIX563, accessed on 8 January 2020); the accession number is OMIX563-20-01, and the NCBI SRA number: SRP410034, and also accession number: SRR2240515-20.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Costa, J.L.; Jesus, O.N.D.; Oliverira, G.A.F.; Oliverira, E.J.D. Effect of selection on genetic variability in yellow passion fruit. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2014, 12, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Huang, D.; Xu, Y.; Wu, B.; Ma, F.N.; Song, S. Comparative analysis of basic quality of passion fruits (Passiflora edulis Sims) in Guangxi, Guizhou and Fujian, China. Bangladesh J. Bot. 2019, 48, 901–906. [Google Scholar]
  3. Song, S.; Zhang, D.; Ma, F.; Xing, W.; Huang, D.; Wu, B.; Chen, J.; Chen, D.; Xu, B.; Xu, Y. Genome-wide identification and expression analyses of the aquaporin gene family in passion fruit (Passiflora edulis), revealing PeTIP3-2 to be involved in drought stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Xu, Y.; Li, P.; Ma, F.; Huang, D.; Xing, W.; Wu, B.; Sun, P.; Xu, B.; Song, S. Characterization of the NAC Transcription Factor in Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis) and Functional Identification of PeNAC-19 in Cold Stress. Plants 2023, 12, 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Corrales, A.R.; Nebauer, S.G.; Carrillo, L.; Fernández-Nohales, P.; Marqués, J.; Renau-Morata, B.; Granell, A.; Pollmann, S.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J.; Molina, R.-V.; et al. Characterization of tomato cycling Dof factors reveals conserved and new functions in the control of flowering time and abiotic tress responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 995–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ewas, M.; Khames, E.; Ziaf, K.; Shahzad, R.; Nishawy, E.; Ali, F.; Subthain, H.; Amar, M.H.; Ayaad, M.; Ghaly, O.; et al. The Tomato DOF Daily Fluctuations 1, TDDF1 acts as flowering accelerator and protector against various stresses. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ruta, V.; Longo, C.; Lepri, A.; Angelis, V.D.; Occhigrossi, S.; Costantino, P.; Vittorioso, P. The DOF Transcription Factors in Seed and Seedling Development. Plants 2020, 9, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Blair, E.J.; Goralogia, G.S.; Lincoln, M.J.; Imaizumi, T.; Nagel, D.H. Clock-Controlled and Cold-Induced CYCLING DOF FACTOR6 Alters Growth and Development in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 919676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ramírez Gonzales, L.; Shi, L.; Bergonzi, S.B.; Oortwijn, M.; Franco-Zorrilla, J.M.; Solano-Tavira, R.; Visser, R.G.F.; Abelenda, J.A.; Bachem, C.W.B. Potato CYCLING DOF FACTOR 1 and its lncRNA counterpart StFLORE link tuber development and drought response. Plant J. 2021, 105, 855–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Da Silva, D.C.; da Silveira Falavigna, V.; Fasoli, M.; Buffon, V.; Porto, D.D.; Pappas, G.J., Jr.; Pezzotti, M.; Pasquali, G.; Revers, L.F. Transcriptome analyses of the Dof-like gene family in grapevine reveal its involvement in berry, flower and seed development. Hortic. Res. 2016, 3, 16042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rojas-Gracia, P.; Roque, E.; Medina, M.; López-Martín, M.J.; Cañas, L.A.; Beltrán, J.P.; Gómez-Mena, C. The DOF Transcription Factor SlDOF10 Regulates Vascular Tissue Formation during Ovary Development in Tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Riechmann, J.L.; Heard, J.; Martin, G.; Reuber, L.; Jiang, C.; Keddie, J.; Adam, L.; Pineda, O.; Ratcliffe, O.J.; Samaha, R.R.; et al. Arabidopsis transcription factors: Genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science 2000, 290, 2105–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Diego, L.; Pilar, C.; Jesús, V.C. Genome-wide comparative phylogenetic analysis of the rice and Arabidopsis Dof gene families. BMC Evol. Biol. 2003, 3, 17. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hariom, K.; Shubhra, G.; Kumar, S.V.; Smita, R.; Dinesh, Y. Genome wide identification of Dof transcription factor gene family in sorghum and its comparative phylogenetic analysis with rice and Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 38, 5037–5053. [Google Scholar]
  15. Venkatesh, J.; Park, S.W. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of DNA-binding with one zinc finger (Dof) transcription factor family in potato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 94, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yanagisawa, S.; Izui, K. Molecular cloning of two DNA-binding proteins of maize that are structurally different but interact with the same sequence motif. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 16028–16036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yu, H.Y.; Ma, Y.Y.; Lu, Y.J.; Yue, J.J.; Ming, R. Expression profiling of the Dof gene family under abiotic stresses in spinach. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 14429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, H.; Zhao, S.; Gao, Y.; Yang, J. Characterization of Dof transcription factors and their responses to osmotic stress in poplar (Populus trichocarpa). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Hong, K.; Xian, J.; Jia, Z.; Hou, X.; Zhang, L. Genome-wide identification of Dof transcription factors possibly associated with internal browning of postharvest pineapple fruits. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 251, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wen, C.L.; Cheng, Q.; Zhao, L.; Mao, A.; Yang, J.; Yu, S.; Weng, Y.; Xu, Y. Identification and characterisation of Dof transcription factors in the cucumber genome. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koralewski, T.; Krutovsky, K. Evolution of exon–intron structure and alternative splicing. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Malviya, N.; Gupta, S.; Singh, V.K.; Yadav, M.K.; Bisht, N.C.; Sarangi, B.K.; Yadav, D. Genome wide in silico characterization of Dof gene families of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 42, 535–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Eckardt, N. Dissecting cis-regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Yanagisawa, S.; Sheen, J. Involvement of maize Dof zinc finger proteins in tissue-specific and light-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Neeta, L.; Saeid, B.; Mohan, B.S.; Prem, L.B. Genome-Wide In Silico Identification and Comparative Analysis of Dof Gene Family in Brassica napus. Plants 2021, 10, 709. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gandass, N.; Kajal Salvi, P. Intrinsically disordered protein, DNA binding with one finger transcription factor (OsDOF27) implicates thermotolerance in yeast and rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 956299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Corrales, A.R.; Carrillo, L.; Lasierra, P.; Nebauer, S.G.; Dominguez-Figueroa, J.; Morata, B.R.; Pollmann, S.; Granell, A.; Molina, R.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J.; et al. Multifaceted role of cycling DOF factor 3 (CDF3) in the regulation of flowering time and abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 748–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, Y.; Zhou, W.; Ma, F.; Huang, D.; Xing, W.; Wu, B.; Sun, P.; Chen, D.; Xu, B.; Song, S. Characterization of the Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis Sim) bHLH Family in Fruit Development and Abiotic Stress and Functional Analysis of PebHLH56 in Cold Stress. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.S.; Xu, Y.; Xing, W.T.; Wu, B.; Huang, D.M.; Ma, F.N. Identification of the passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims) MYB family in fruit development and abiotic stress, and functional analysis of PeMYB87 in abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1124351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, Y.; Jin, Z.Q.; Xu, B.Y.; Li, J.Y.; Li, Y.J.; Wang, X.Y.; Wang, A.B.; Hu, W.; Huang, D.M.; Wei, Q.; et al. Identification of transcription factors interacting with a 1274bp promoter of MaPIP1;1 which confers high-level gene expression and drought stress Inducibility in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 12091 g001 550
Figure 1. Homology analysis, chromosomal localization interaction regulated network, and protein structure prediction of PeDofs. (A) Phylogenetic relationship of Dofs among passion fruit, Arabidopsis and rice. red pentagram: passion fruit, yellow triangle: Arabidopsis, blue circle: rice (B) Distribution of 13 PeDof genes. (C) The predicted interaction networks of PeDof proteins. (D) The 3D-structure modeling of PeDof proteins.
Figure 1. Homology analysis, chromosomal localization interaction regulated network, and protein structure prediction of PeDofs. (A) Phylogenetic relationship of Dofs among passion fruit, Arabidopsis and rice. red pentagram: passion fruit, yellow triangle: Arabidopsis, blue circle: rice (B) Distribution of 13 PeDof genes. (C) The predicted interaction networks of PeDof proteins. (D) The 3D-structure modeling of PeDof proteins.
Ijms 24 12091 g001
Ijms 24 12091 g002 550
Figure 2. The PeDof genes and promoters structure characteristics analysis. (A) The clustering and gene structure analysis, (B) The promoter element analysis.
Figure 2. The PeDof genes and promoters structure characteristics analysis. (A) The clustering and gene structure analysis, (B) The promoter element analysis.
Ijms 24 12091 g002
Ijms 24 12091 g003 550
Figure 3. The collinearity distribution of PeDofs (A) and synteny collinearity of passion fruit, Arabidopsis, and rice genomes (B). The blue line represented the associated gene pairs.
Figure 3. The collinearity distribution of PeDofs (A) and synteny collinearity of passion fruit, Arabidopsis, and rice genomes (B). The blue line represented the associated gene pairs.
Ijms 24 12091 g003
Ijms 24 12091 g004 550
Figure 4. Expression analysis of the PeDofs during three fruit-ripening periods in the passion fruit. The details are shown in Table S4. Data are means ± SD of n = 3 biological replicates. Means denoted by the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 4. Expression analysis of the PeDofs during three fruit-ripening periods in the passion fruit. The details are shown in Table S4. Data are means ± SD of n = 3 biological replicates. Means denoted by the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 24 12091 g004
Ijms 24 12091 g005 550
Figure 5. Transcriptome (A) and qRT-PCR CK: Plants without high-temperature stress treatment (B) of PeDofs responding to high temperature. Red and blue indicated high and low expression levels, respectively. Data are means ± SD of n = 3 biological replicates. Means denoted by the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 5. Transcriptome (A) and qRT-PCR CK: Plants without high-temperature stress treatment (B) of PeDofs responding to high temperature. Red and blue indicated high and low expression levels, respectively. Data are means ± SD of n = 3 biological replicates. Means denoted by the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 24 12091 g005
Ijms 24 12091 g006 550
Figure 6. Growth status of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae INVSc1 Strain expressing pYES2–PeDof-11 and pYES2 (control) under high-temperature stress.
Figure 6. Growth status of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae INVSc1 Strain expressing pYES2–PeDof-11 and pYES2 (control) under high-temperature stress.
Ijms 24 12091 g006
Ijms 24 12091 g007 550
Figure 7. GUS staining was performed on transgenic tobacco. The tobacco was treated with 4 replicates per treatment and then processed into discs (diameter 0.5 cm).
Figure 7. GUS staining was performed on transgenic tobacco. The tobacco was treated with 4 replicates per treatment and then processed into discs (diameter 0.5 cm).
Ijms 24 12091 g007
Ijms 24 12091 g008 550
Figure 8. Tissue specificity and expression pattern of PeDof-11 under high-temperature stress. (A) GUS staining in different tissues of transgenic Arabidopsis L1-p, L2-p. (B) GUS staining of transgenic Arabidopsis seedling. (C) GUS enzyme activity analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis (7 days old). (D) Grown seedling phenotype under high-temperature stress. (E) Grown seedling survival statistics of 20-days-old Arabidopsis. Data are means ± SD of n = 3 biological replicates. Means denoted by the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 8. Tissue specificity and expression pattern of PeDof-11 under high-temperature stress. (A) GUS staining in different tissues of transgenic Arabidopsis L1-p, L2-p. (B) GUS staining of transgenic Arabidopsis seedling. (C) GUS enzyme activity analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis (7 days old). (D) Grown seedling phenotype under high-temperature stress. (E) Grown seedling survival statistics of 20-days-old Arabidopsis. Data are means ± SD of n = 3 biological replicates. Means denoted by the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 24 12091 g008
Table
Table 1. Analysis of physicochemical properties of PeDofs.
Table 1. Analysis of physicochemical properties of PeDofs.
GeneGene IDCDS Length (bp)Protein Length (aa)Molecular FormulaMW (Da)pINumber of Phosphate SitesSubcellular Localization
PeDof-1P_edulia010000233.g1434477C2245H3535N647O725S2251,894.986.72Ser:56 Thr:22 Tyr:19Nucleus
PeDof-2P_edulia010001122.g852283C1289H1984N386O407S1129,752.939.25Ser:39 Thr:13 Tyr:9Nucleus
PeDof-3P_edulia010002592.g891296C1396H2158N410O463S1832,670.046.31Ser:35 Thr:21 Tyr:8Nucleus
PeDof-4P_edulia010002622.g849282C1274H1983N375O408S1429,529.878.96Ser:42 Thr:13 Tyr:6Nucleus
PeDof-5P_edulia020006400.g1083360C1701H2678N490O553S1939,450.078.07Ser:51 Thr:24 Tyr:13Nucleus
PeDof-6P_edulia030008409.g1014337C1564H2429N459O502S1436,143.109.31Ser:49 Thr:17 Tyr:11Nucleus
PeDof-7P_edulia030009124.g1503500C2359H3647N679O782S2354,769.375.63Ser:59 Thr:30 Tyr:22Nucleus
PeDof-8P_edulia040010004.g1038345C1599H2471N457O511S1436,721.808.85Ser:51 Thr:18 Tyr:15Nucleus
PeDof-9P_edulia040010672.g738245C1179H1839N333O367S1026,871.189.01Ser:27 Thr:19 Tyr:10Nucleus
PeDof-10P_edulia060015094.g906301C1437H2240N404O482S2033,529.214.75Ser:44 Thr:14 Tyr:13Nucleus
PeDof-11P_edulia070018540.g750249C1138H1749N339O373S1126,500.118.14Ser:32 Thr:12 Tyr:6Nucleus
PeDof-12P_edulia080018881.g804267C1237H1945N369O399S1228,755.009.28Ser:40 Thr:15 Tyr:7Nucleus
PeDof-13P_edulia080019069.g960319C1501H2312N466O486S1335,078.488.57Ser:44 Thr:14 Tyr:11Nucleus
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, G.; Xu, Y.; Gui, J.; Huang, Y.; Ma, F.; Wu, W.; Han, T.; Qiu, W.; Yang, L.; Song, S. Characterization of Dof Transcription Factors and the Heat-Tolerant Function of PeDof-11 in Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12091. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512091

AMA Style

Chen G, Xu Y, Gui J, Huang Y, Ma F, Wu W, Han T, Qiu W, Yang L, Song S. Characterization of Dof Transcription Factors and the Heat-Tolerant Function of PeDof-11 in Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(15):12091. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Ge, Yi Xu, Jie Gui, Yongcai Huang, Funing Ma, Wenhua Wu, Te Han, Wenwu Qiu, Liu Yang, and Shun Song. 2023. "Characterization of Dof Transcription Factors and the Heat-Tolerant Function of PeDof-11 in Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 15: 12091. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512091

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop