Next Article in Journal
Label-Free Human Disease Characterization through Circulating Cell-Free DNA Analysis Using Raman Spectroscopy
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Under-Diagnosed Malignancy during Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Lymphadenopathies
Previous Article in Journal
Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Advanced Melanoma: A Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i as Potential Radiopharmaceuticals for Tumor Microenvironment-Targeted Radiotherapy

by
Myrna Luna-Gutiérrez
1,
Pedro Cruz-Nova
1,
Nallely Jiménez-Mancilla
2,
Rigoberto Oros-Pantoja
3,
Nancy Lara-Almazán
1,
Clara Santos-Cuevas
1,
Erika Azorín-Vega
1,
Blanca Ocampo-García
1,* and
Guillermina Ferro-Flores
1,*
1
Department of Radioactive Materials, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, Ocoyoacac 52750, Mexico
2
Cátedras, CONACyT, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, Ocoyoacac 52750, Mexico
3
Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca 50180, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12382; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512382
Submission received: 30 June 2023 / Revised: 26 July 2023 / Accepted: 31 July 2023 / Published: 3 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Therapeutic Targets in Cancers 2.0)

Abstract

:
Current cancer therapies focus on reducing immunosuppression and remodeling the tumor microenvironment to inhibit metastasis, cancer progression, and therapeutic resistance. Programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) is expressed on immune T cells and is one of the so-called checkpoint proteins that can suppress or stop the immune response. To evade the immune system, cancer cells overexpress a PD-1 inhibitor protein (PD-L1), which binds to the surface of T cells to activate signaling pathways that induce immune suppression. This research aimed to synthesize PD-L1 inhibitory peptides (PD-L1-i) labeled with lutetium-177 (177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i) and actinium-225 (225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i) and to preclinically evaluate their potential as radiopharmaceuticals for targeted radiotherapy at the tumor microenvironment level. Using PD-L1-i peptide as starting material, conjugation with HEHA-benzene-SCN and DOTA-benzene-SCN was performed to yield DOTA-PD-L1-i and HEHA-PD-L1-I, which were characterized by FT-IR, UV-vis spectroscopy, and HPLC. After labeling the conjugates with 225Ac and 177Lu, cellular uptake in HCC827 cancer cells (PD-L1 positive), conjugate specificity evaluation by immunofluorescence, radiotracer effect on cell viability, biodistribution, biokinetics, and assessment of radiation absorbed dose in mice with in duced lung micrometastases were performed. 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i and 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i, obtained with radiochemical purities of 95 ± 3% and 98.5 ± 0.5%, respectively, showed in vitro and in vivo specific recognition for the PD-L1 protein in lung cancer cells and high uptake in HCC287 lung micrometastases (>30% ID). The biokinetic profiles of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-DOTA-PD-L1-i showed rapid blood clearance with renal and hepatobiliary elimination and no accumulation in normal tissues. 225Ac-DOTA-PD-L1-i produced a radiation dose of 5.15 mGy/MBq to lung micrometastases. In the case of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i, the radiation dose delivered to the lung micrometastases was ten times (43 mGy/MBq) that delivered to the kidneys (4.20 mGy/MBq) and fifty times that delivered to the liver (0.85 mGy/MBq). Therefore, the radiotherapeutic PD-L1-i ligands of 225Ac and 177Lu developed in this research could be combined with immunotherapy to enhance the therapeutic effect in various types of cancer.

1. Introduction

Tumors are pathological tissues that comprise cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME includes endothelial and immune cells communicating in a dynamic network through messenger molecules and acellular factors, mainly chemokines, inflammatory enzymes, growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular matrix components [1]. The function of immune cells and messenger molecules associated with the TME is a relevant topic in the research field of cancer biology.
Therefore, current cancer therapies converge on inhibiting cancer progression and therapeutic resistance by reducing immunosuppression and remodeling the TME [2,3]. In this context, previous research on the development of imaging radioligands targeting proteins of the tumor microenvironment, such as nanobodies against proteins of the extracellular matrix [4], radioligands to target the chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR-4) [5,6,7], fibroblast activation protein (FAP) radioinhibitors [8,9,10,11,12], and radiotracers directed to integrins and the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expressed in the tumor neovasculature [13,14,15,16,17,18,19], among others, have proven to be helpful in detecting spatial and temporal changes in the tumor microenvironment phenotype of different cancer entities, which have been essential in defining the treatment of patients according to the expression or suppression of proteins involved in the disease. In particular, the immunotherapeutic pathway has been exploited with various agents, such as monoclonal antibodies, radioimmunoconjugates, and nano-immune systems [20,21].
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is an important treatment option for various cancers [22,23]. Among the targeted immune checkpoints, programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) are the key molecular targets for ICI therapy. Expressed on immune T cells, PD-1 is one of the checkpoint molecules that can suppress or stop immune responses [22]. Therefore, to evade the immune system, cancer cells overexpress a PD-1 inhibitor protein (PD-L1) that binds to the surface of T cells to activate signaling pathways that induce immune suppression. Thus, PD-L1 is a reproducible biomarker that allows therapeutic decisions to be made and the success of the treatment to be monitored. PD-L1 gene expression imaging, which is highly dynamic, can be monitored in a highly specific manner by SPECT/CT and PET/CT imaging techniques, which are used to determine whether a patient is a candidate for immunotherapeutic treatment with anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 antibodies [24,25,26,27]. However, PD-L1 inhibitor radiotherapeutic peptides have not yet been investigated. Lutetium-177 is a β-emitting radionuclide with a mean tissue penetration of 0.67 mm (maximum energy: 497 keV), and actinium-225 is an alpha-emitting radionuclide with a maximum tissue penetration of a few cell diameters (emission of four high-energy alpha particles with an energy of 6 MeV). Therefore, both radionuclides have sufficient energy and tissue penetration to kill target tumor cells with limited effect on adjacent healthy cells.
This research aimed to synthesize lutetium-177- and actinium-225-labeled PD-L1 inhibitory peptides (177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i) and to preclinically evaluate their potential as radiopharmaceuticals for targeted radiotherapy of various cancers at the tumor microenvironment level.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Chemical Characterization of DOTA-PD-L1-i and HEHA-PD-L1-i

The schematic chemical structures of PD-L1-i, DOTA-PD-L1-i, and HEHA-PD-L1-i are shown in Appendix A (Figure A1, Figure A2 and Figure A3).
The PD-L1-i mass spectrum showed m/z of 1882.3 (calcd. 1881) [M + H], m/z 941.2 (calcd. 1881) [M + 2H]/2, and m/z 628.6 (calcd. 1881) [M + 3H]/3 (Figure 1). From the PD-L1-i compound as row material, the conjugation with HEHA-benzene-SCN and DOTA-benzene-SCN was performed to obtain DOTA-PD-L1-i (m/z 1271.8, calcd. 2541.6, [M + 2H]/2) and HEHA-PD-L1-i (m/z 873.3, calcd. 2633.9 minus –OH in HEHA, [M + 3H]/3; at m/z 867, two –OH were lost and at m/z 574, –CH3–COOH was lost in HEHA) (Figure 1). The PD-L1 inhibitor ligands (PD-L1-i, DOTA-PD-L1-i, and HEHA-PD-L1-i) were also characterized using FT-IR, UV-vis spectroscopy, and HPLC, as described below.
The IR analysis of the PD-L1 inhibitor conjugates showed that the band at 1658 cm−1 of PD-L1-i, associated with the –C=O stretching of carbonyl bonds (–CO–NH–), decreased in energy to 1671 cm−1 in both DOTA-PD-L1-i and HEHA-PD-L1-i as a result of the conjugation reaction (–HN–CS–NH-benzene-DOTA/-HEHA), which produced a decrease in the absorption frequency, as dipole moments in the cyclic peptide ring were reduced (Figure 2). On the other hand, the band at 3310 cm−1 of PD-L1-I, associated with the primary amine of ornithine (–NH2), increased in energy to 3276 cm−1 and 3280 cm−1 in the DOTA-PD-L1-i and HEHA-PD-L1-i conjugates, respectively, which is characteristic of –NH– bond formation (–HN–CS–). Further evidence for the conjugation process was the substantial increase in the band’s intensity at 1202 cm−1 associated with a rise in the –C–O– stretching from DOTA and HEHA carboxylic acids (O=CO–H) (Figure 2).
The UV-vis spectra of the PD-L1-i conjugates show several shoulders and peaks from 211 nm to 226 nm, which are assigned to the n→σ* electronic transitions from sulfur as a heteroatom (-H2C–S–CH2), π→π* electronic transitions from double bonds within amino acid carbonyls, and –C=O from carboxylic acids. The band at 283 nm is associated with π→π* and n→π* electronic transitions (–C=C– and –C=N– groups) of the peptide side chain rings (e.g., imidazole ring) (Figure 3B). The single broad and well-defined band at 283 nm of DOTA-PD-L1-i and HEHA-PD-L1-i appears different from that of the precursors (278 nm from the PD-L1-i ligand and the 272 nm and 281 nm doublet from the DOTA-/HEHA-Benzene-SCN precursors), indicating new chemical compound formation (PD-L1-i conjugates) (Figure 3).

2.2. Radiolabeling of PD-L1-i Ligands with 177Lu and 225Ac

The radiopharmaceuticals 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i were initially obtained with radiochemical purities of 98.5 ± 0.5% (without further purification) and 83 ± 2% (95 ± 3% after purification using Sep-Pak C18 cartridges), respectively, as determined by radio-HPLC (C-18 reversed phase) (Figure 4 and Figure 5). However, to assess the radiochemical purity of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i, fractions of 1 mL eluted from the column had to be collected and counted in a NaI(Tl) detector (Figure 5). Retention times for 177LuCl3 and 225AcCl3 were between 2.5 and 4.5 min and 16 to 18 min for 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i. It is important to note that chromatograms are usually achieved with radiometric and UV-vis detectors. After injecting the radiotracer into the HPLC system, it was first identified using the UV-vis instrument, and after 0.8–1.0 min (0.8–1.0 mL, 1 mL/min), it was detected with the radiometric detector. An agreement of retention times between the peak observed in the UV-vis chromatogram (PD-L1-i conjugate) and the radio-chromatogram is usually considered evidence of the chemical identity of the radiopharmaceutical (Figure 4) [29].

2.3. In Vitro Evaluation

2.3.1. Stability

PD-L1 inhibitor radioconjugates showed no differences regarding stability as a function of the dilution medium. 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i remained stable in water (injectable-grade water/ascorbic acid/sodium acetate) and human serum with radiochemical purities greater than 97.5 ± 0.5% after 72 h of labeling (inset: Figure 4). In contrast, the radiochemical purity of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i decreased to 64 ± 4% in both water and human serum 72 h after purification, at a rate of approximately 0.388%/h (slope = −0.388) (inset: Figure 5). It is important to mention that, although it was not the aim of this study, we also examined the preparation of 225Ac-DOTA-PD-L1-i, which showed a radiochemical purity of 9 ± 3% in water after 72 h of labeling (1.149%/h rate of decrease). It is well documented that the main disadvantage of 225Ac complexes is the recoil energy of the nucleus during decay, which induces the breaking of the bond with the chelator [30]. In agreement with previous research, the use of HEHA instead of DOTA improves the stability of the coordination complex [31,32]. Nevertheless, the recoil energy of 225Ac and its progeny (four alpha particles) will inevitably produce, to a greater or lesser extent, time-unstable 225Ac complexes [30,33].

2.3.2. Cellular Uptake Assay

HCC827 cells (PD-L1 positive control) were found to uptake approximately fourteen times more 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i than C6 cells (PD-L1 negative control) (Figure 6a). The expression of PD-L1 in HCC827 cells (Figure 6b) and the lack of PD-L1 expression in C6 cells (Figure 6c) were confirmed by immunofluorescent microscopy, thus ensuring that the radiotracer uptake is specific and associated with the presence of PD-L1 in HCC827 cells. It was also proven by immunofluorescent microscopy that the PD-L1-i ligand, used in this research for 177Lu and 225Ac labeling, is recognized by the PD-L1 protein expressed in HCC827 cells (Figure 7).

2.3.3. Cell Viability Assays

A decrease in the viability of HCC827 cells was observed depending on the target-specific radiotherapy mediated by the PD-L1 recognition (Figure 8). Cells treated with an acute radiation dose of 15 Gy using 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i (cells incubated for 5 h with 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i; 1.4 MBq/20,000) showed a net decrease viability of 31.42 ± 2.01%, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test) compared to the group treated with PD-L1-i (decrease viability of 4 ± 1%; 0.1 µg/20,000 cells) (Figure 8b,c). The viability of cells treated with 5 Gy of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i (cells incubated for 5 h with 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i; 0.37 kBq/20,000 cells) had a net decrease viability of 42.54 ± 3.87% vs. 4 ± 1% of those treated with PD-L1-i (Figure 8b,d). The reason why we used a three times lower radiation dose for 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i (5 Gy) than for 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i (15 Gy) was the consideration of the high number of short path ionizations generated by alpha particle emitters (high LET) damaging DNA structures. This effect, known as RBE (relative biological efficiency), explains why actinium-225 affected cell viability more than lutetium-177, even at a lower radiation dose [34].

2.4. In Vivo Evaluation

2.4.1. Biodistribution and Biokinetic Models

In healthy mice, the 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-DOTA-PD-L1-i biodistribution profiles showed rapid blood clearance with renal and hepatobiliary elimination and no accumulation in normal tissues. (Figure 9a and Figure 10a).
According to the biokinetic model of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i obtained in mice intravenously injected with HCC827 lung cancer cells (PD-L1+) (Figure 9b), seventy-four percent of the activity taken up in the liver was cleared rapidly (λ = 1.23), with a half-life of 0.56 h (t1/2 = ln2/λ = 0.56 h) associated with the hepatobiliary elimination, while twenty-six percent was cleared slowly (λ = 0.01; t1/2 = 69 h), possibly related to the fraction retained in the reticuloendothelial system. The short half-life time observed in the biokinetic model of kidneys (t1/2 = ln2/3.65 = 0.19 h) can be correlated with renal elimination and reabsorption in the proximal tubule, whereas the slow elimination slope (t1/2 = ln2/0.009 = 77 h) would be related to the breakdown of the peptide fragment, where 177Lu is retained for a longer time [35]. The most extended 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i retention time was observed in lungs invaded with HCC827 cancer cells. Ninety percent of the lung uptake activity had a half-life of 346.5 h, and only ten percent had a half-life of 17.3 h (Figure 9b); consequently, the absorbed radiation dose delivered to the lungs was ten times that given to the kidneys and fifty times than that to the liver (Table 1).
In the case of the 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i radiocomplex, the biodistribution profile during the first hours after injection showed higher uptake of radioactivity in most of the organs examined and a significantly higher hepatic uptake and retention (17.4% of the injected dose was eliminated with a half-life of 69.3 h) than in the case of the 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i complex, which may be related to the presence of Ac3+ and its progeny released from the radiocomplex, initially distributed in healthy organs and subsequently retained in the liver and, to a lesser extent, in the kidney (12.6% of the injected dose was eliminated with a half-life of 0.19 h and 8.14% with a half-life of 0.27 h) (Figure 10). Therefore, the absorbed radiation dose delivered to the lungs was almost equal to that of the kidneys and only 3.5 times that given to the liver (Table 1). Although biodistribution was performed for dosimetric purposes (only %ID in whole organs was calculated), the Ac-225 activity present in bone was also measured and was not significant (0.3 ± 0.2% ID/g).

2.4.2. Radioisotopic Imaging

In vivo and ex vivo radioisotopic images of athymic mice with lung micrometastases after 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i administration showed that the only tissue that accumulated the radiotracer was the lung invaded by HCC827 cancer cells, while the liver and kidneys captured and eliminated the radiotracer according to their physiological excretory function (Figure 11).
In addition, paraffin sections of the lungs of mice injected with HCC827 cells were analyzed for growth within the lung parenchyma using hematoxylin and eosin histological staining (Figure 12e). Metastases were found in the lungs of all mice injected with cancer cells, as tumors grew within the lung parenchyma in the form of atypical nuclei and mitotic structures (Figure 12e). No metastases were found in the lungs of untreated control animals (control: without induced lung micrometastases) (Figure 12f). The metastatic adenocarcinoma tissue growing within the lung parenchyma distinctly differed from normal alveolar lung tissue and demonstrated biphasic growth of this cancerous tissue. Histological staining (H&E) analysis also revealed no pathologic changes in the liver and kidney of mice injected with the radiopharmaceuticals (Figure A4). There was no presence of any form of steatosis, cytoplasmic changes, or necrotic evidence. Hemorrhage and inflammatory infiltrations were absent (Figure A4). No evidence of cytotoxic degeneration was observed in nonparenchymal cells or hepatocytes (Figure A4). No significant cytotoxic effect was observed in the function of liver and kidney involved in metabolism, elimination, and or excretion of 177Lu-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i (Table A1).
The 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i uptake pattern (average number of emitted photons per normalized area showed in the color bar of Figure 12) in the lungs of mice with metastatic HCC827 cells (298 ± 82 photons/cm2) was statistically significantly different (p < 0.05; Student’s t-test) compared with the group of mice in which metastases were not induced (78 ± 32 photons/cm2).
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy using nanobodies, minibodies, antibodies, and, more recently, PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitory peptides for nuclear molecular imaging have demonstrated their utility as highly specific biomolecules for targeting the tumor microenvironment (TME) [27]. Therefore, the radiotherapeutic PD-L1-i ligands of 225Ac and 177Lu developed in this research, with biokinetic and dosimetric properties suitable for delivering ablative radiation doses at the TME level, can potentially be combined with ICI immunotherapy and enhance the therapeutic effect in different types of cancer. It has been previously reported, at the preclinical and clinical levels, that radioimmunotherapy improves therapeutic outcomes, mitigates immune side effects, and reduces the induced radio-toxicity [36] in addition to promoting tumor regression of nonirradiated metastases in patients (abscopal effect), due to the power of radiation on increased cancer cell apoptosis and release of tumor-associated antigens with subsequent delivery of CD8+ T cells as an anti-tumor response [37]. However, poorly immunogenic tumors do not respond to ICI therapy. In these cases, the use of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i and 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i in combination with the nonradiolabeled PD-L1-i ligand would be a viable option. This proposal is based on recent successful therapeutic results obtained by combining the radioligand 177Lu-PSMA-617 or 225Ac-PSMA-617 (targeting prostate cancer cells) with the pharmaceutical anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab), which showed a marked synergistic effect and overcame immune limitations in patients with poorly immunogenic tumors [38].
The biodistribution of the radiopharmaceuticals analyzed in this study suggests that 177Lu-PD-L1-i may have a better biokinetic and dosimetric profile than 225Ac-PD-L1-i for use in targeted radiotherapy. Therefore, the results obtained justify that, as future work, preclinical studies of therapeutic efficacy should be carried out not only in a lung cancer model because, given the nature of PD-L1 gene expression in a wide range of cancer types, therapeutic efficacy should be evaluated in different models and cancer types induced and correlated with other markers of immune response.

3. Materials and Methods

Human plasma was provided by Alfa Aesar (USA). The macrocycles S-2-(4-isothiocyanatobenzyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecanic acid (DOTA-benzene-p-SCN) and 2-(4-isothiocyanatobenzyl)-1,2,7,10,13-hexaazacyclooctadecane-1,4,7,10,13,16-hexaacetic acid (HEHA-benzene-p-SCN) were obtained from Macrocyclics (Dallas, TX, USA). Lutetium-177 (177Lu), as 177LuCl3, was provided by ITM, Germany. Actinium-225 (225Ac), as 225AcCl3, was provided by IPPE Joint-Stock Company (Obninsk, Russia). HCC827 human lung cancer (PD-L1 positive) and C6 mouse glioma (PD-L1 negative) cell lines were purchased from ATCC® (Manassas, VA, USA). All other reagents were purchased from Merk Millipore (Burlington, MA, USA). The PD-L1-I was synthesized, as previously reported [28], by a customized service, for research purposes, by Shanghai Yaxian Chemical Co., Ltd. (Jiading, Shanghai, China).

3.1. Synthesis and Chemical Characterization of DOTA-PD-L1-i and HEHA-PD-L1-i

DOTA-benzene-p-SCN (2 mg; 2.91 µmol) or HEHA-benzene-p-SCN (3 mg; 3.1 µmol) was dissolved in 1 mL of 0.2 M NaHCO3 buffer at pH 9.5, and then PD-L1-i ligand (6 mg; 3.2 µmol) was added. The mixture was incubated at 95 °C for 30 min. After cooling, 100 µL of ethanol was added. Finally, the conjugates were purified by preparative HPLC in line with a UV-vis detector (Waters) (Epic C18 Column, 5 μm, L:250 mm, Diam. Int: 20 mm, Perkin Elmer) using a linear gradient (rate flow of 4 mL/min) of CH3CN-0.1% TFA (B)/H2O-TFA (A), from 100% to 10% of A in 30 min. The fractions containing the conjugates (absorbance: 283 nm) were lyophilized.
Mass spectroscopy analysis (+Q1: 0.168 to 0.503 min, turbo spray, centroided) for the PD-L1-i peptide precursor was performed in an LC/MS system (Agilent 6460 series instrument) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
The IR spectra of DOTA-PD-L1-i and HEHA-PD-L1-i were acquired on an Agilent Technologies FT-IR 660 spectrometer (from 50 scans at 0.4 cm−1, from 400 to 4000 cm−1).
The UV-vis spectra (Thermo Fisher Genesys 10S spectrometer) of the PD-L1-i conjugates (1 mg/mL) were obtained from 210 to 300 nm.

3.2. Radiolabeling with 177Lu and 225Ac

DOTA-PD-L1-i or HEHA-PD-L1-i (1 mg) was dissolved in 50 µL of ethanol, adjusting to a final volume of 1 mL with 1 M acetate buffer, pH 5.0 to 20 µL of the PD-L1-i conjugates, 80 µL of 177LuCl3 (370 MBq in 0.01M HCl) or 225AcCl3 (370 kBq in 0.01M HCl) were added. Finally, the mixture was incubated at 95 °C for 60 min. After labeling, 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-I was purified using solid-phase extraction (Speak C18 cartridge, Waters). Radioactive solutions were diluted in injectable-grade water (1 mL) for further use. For comparative purposes, Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i was also prepared under the same conditions using stable LuCl3 (anhydrous powder; 99.99% trace metal basis; Sigma-Aldrich: Saint Louis, MO, USA) followed by HPLC purification.
The radiochemical purity of the radioconjugates was determined by reversed-phase HPLC (Waters) with radiometric and UV-vis detectors. The analysis was carried out with a Discovery C18 column (particle size: 5 µm, length: 25 cm, diameter: 4.6 mm). A linear gradient (rate flow: 1 mL/min) of CH3CN-0.1% TFA (B)/H2O-0.1%TFA (A), from 100% to 10% of A in 30 min, was used. For 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i, fractions of 1.0 mL were collected, and the activity was evaluated in a NaI(Tl) detector (Auto In-v-tron 4010; NML Inc., Houston, TX, USA).

3.3. Serum Stability

The 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i and 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i stability was evaluated in the medium they were obtained after labeling (water/ascorbic acid/sodium acetate) at 0.33, 3, 24, 48, and 72 h with radio-HPLC, as previously described. The conjugate solutions were diluted in human serum (5x) for stability assessment. The conjugates (n = 3) were incubated at 37 °C, and samples were taken at 0.33, 3, 24, 48, and 72 h.

3.4. Cellular Uptake

HCC827 human lung cancer (PD-L1 positive) and C6 mouse glioma (PD-L1 negative) cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium with penicillin and streptomycin (100 µg/mL) and fetal bovine serum (15%) in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cells diluted in PBS (pH 7) (1 × 105 cells/tube) received two different treatments: (a) 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i (4 kBq) (n = 3) and (b) 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i (0.04 kBq) (n = 3). Cells were incubated with each treatment at 37 °C for 1 h. After incubation, tubes were measured in a NaI(Tl) detector to determine the initial activity (100%). The tubes were centrifuged at 500× g for 10 min. Then, a mixture of acetic acid/0.5 M NaCl was added, and the centrifugation was repeated. The liquid was removed, and the button activity was measured, corresponding to the percentage of activity captured by the cells regarding the initial activity.

3.5. Immunofluorescence

The HCC827 and C6 cell lines were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, permeabilized with 0.5% TritonX-100, and 1% bovine serum albumin was used for cell blocking. Therefore, cells were incubated overnight with anti-PD-L1/CD274 antibody (FineTest Cat. FNab06280) at 1:25 or Cy7-conjugated PD-L1-i dilution prepared in agreement with the supplier instructions (Cy®7 Mono NHS Ester, pack of 1 mg, Merck Sigma-Aldrich). Cells incubated with anti-PD-L1/CD274 antibody were then incubated 1 h with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) (Invitrogen Cat. A32731). DAPI was used for intracellular fluorescence intensity observation for nuclei staining and fluorescence microscopy (Meiji Techno; Mod. MT6200: Saitama, Japan).

3.6. Cell Viability Assay

The effect of 177Lu DOTA-PD-L1-i, 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i, and PD-L1-i on HCC827 cell viability (5 × 104) was determined by flow cytometry with the Muse® Count & Viability Kit from Luminex, DiaSorin, USA. Before taking readings with the Muse Cell Analyzer (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) previously calibrated with the Muse® System Check kit, the baseline detection was established using a fresh sample of untreated cells that served to delimit the size and granularity of the cell line, as well as the basal viability of the population. Also, the reading window for dead cells was established using an aliquot of the same population treated with 0.5% Triton-X100. Once the detection window for the HCC827 cells was established to discriminate between live and dead cells, 50 µL (2 × 104 cells/200 µL) were taken from the cell suspension that had been treated with cold ligand (PD-L1-i, 0.1 µg), with 1.4 MBq of 177Lu DOTA-PD-L1-i or 0.37 kBq of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i for 5 h and then mixed with 450 µL of the viability reagent; after 5 min incubation at room temperature and in the dark, the samples were read in triplicate. For the calculation of the radiation absorbed dose to cell nuclei, the total number of nuclear transformations (N) normalized to the unit of administered activity (Bq.s/Bq) was obtained with the A(t) mathematical integration (from t = 0 to t = 5 h). Multiplying N by the dose factor (DF)(Gy/Bq.s) from the cytoplasm to the nucleus (MIRDcell software, version 2.1), the radiation absorbed dose was obtained. The progeny of 225Ac was considered. The model included cells with a diameter of 20 µm, a nucleus radius of 3 µm, and a density of 1 mg/mL.

3.7. Biodistribution and Studies

Under an approved protocol (No. 07-2018-2021), all animal procedures followed the ethical regulations for handling laboratory animals (NOM-062-ZOO-1999) and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee requirements. Male Nu/Nu (UPEAL, CINVESTAV, I.PN., Mexico City, Mexico) mice aged 6–8 weeks were maintained in a pathogen-free barrier facility. Mice were injected with 3.7 MBq (50 µL) of 177Lu DOTA-PD-L1-I or 3.7 kBq (50 µL) of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i in the tail vein and sacrificed at 0.5, 1, 3, 24, 72, and 96 h (n = 3). The heart, lungs, liver, pancreas, spleen, kidneys, small intestine, brain, and stomach were dissected to be measured in a NaI(Tl) radioactivity detector. The results are expressed as the percentage of injected dose (%ID) per organ. Blood samples were also extracted, and the activity was recorded as %ID/g. A second group of mice was inoculated intravenously with 1 × 106 HCC827 cells. The animals were treated with 3.7 MBq (50 µL) of 177Lu DOTA-PD-L1-i (n = 3) or 3.7 kBq (50 µL) of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i (n = 3) via tail vein injection on day five post-tumor cell inoculation. The animals were dissected as described above. In the case of 177Lu DOTA-PD-L1-i, radioisotopic/X-ray in vivo/ex vivo images were obtained in a Preclinical Imaging System (Bruker, XTREME). For in vivo imaging, mice were anesthetized with oxygen and 2% isoflurane.

3.8. Absorbed Radiation Dose Assessment

The %ID values were used to obtain the biokinetic models ( q h t ). The A h ( t ) functions were obtained by decay-correcting the biokinetic models, that is, by adding to the biological constant ( λ B ) the radioactive constant ( λ R ), as follows (Equation (1)):
A t = B e ( λ R + λ B ) t + C e ( λ R + λ B ) t + D e ( λ R + λ B ) t
For dosimetry, 225Ac decay chain was considered. The biokinetic models’ integration (from t = 0 to t = ∞) calculated the N value in each murine organ. The DF values were those reported in the OLINDA 2.0 code.

3.9. Histopathological Assessment

Healthy lungs, kidneys, liver, and lungs from mice injected i.v. with HCC827 cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h at room temperature, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned in 4–5 µm thick sections using a microtome. Paraffin sections of lung samples were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a series of graded alcohols. Dewaxed tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The sections were assessed using a light microscope (magnification of 100x) (Zeiss; Mod. Axioscope: Oberkochen, Germany). Images were acquired with a digital camera (5 MP high-speed color; AmScope; Mod.Mu500: Irvine, CA, USA).

3.10. Evaluation of Creatinine and Liver Enzyme Levels

Mouse blood samples collected at 96 h after radiopharmaceutical administration were used for the determination of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Creatinine was measured titrimetrically. The picrate method was used. AST and ALT were quantified using a Roche Diagnostics kit for UV assays.

4. Conclusions

The radiotherapeutic PD-L1-i ligands of 225Ac and 177Lu developed in this research, with biokinetic and dosimetric properties suitable for delivering ablative radiation doses at the tumor microenvironment level, could potentially be combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and enhance the therapeutic effect in various types of cancer. Considering the ease of preparation and high in vitro and in vivo stability, 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i is proposed as the best option for in vivo PD-L1 protein-targeted radiotherapy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.F.-F., E.A.-V., B.O.-G. and M.L.-G.; methodology, M.L.-G., P.C.-N., N.J.-M., N.L.-A. and R.O.-P.; formal analysis, G.F.-F., E.A.-V., B.O.-G., P.C.-N. and C.S.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.L.-G. and G.F.-F.; writing—review and editing, G.F.-F.; funding acquisition, G.F.-F. and C.S.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Consejo Mexiquense de Ciencia y Tecnología” (COMECyT) through the program collaboration networks EDOMEX, grant number: FICDTEM-2023-152. The authors are grateful for the partial financial support from the International Atomic Energy Agency through CRP projects: F22075 and F22078.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This research was approved by the Ethics Internal Committee of Use and Care of Laboratory Animals (CICUAL-ININ) of the National Institute of Nuclear Research, Approval No. 07-2018-2021.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as a component of the activities of the “Laboratorio Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Radiofármacos, ININ”. The authors thank the “Laboratorio Nacional de Investigaciones en Forense Nuclear”, CONACyT (LANAFONU), for conducting the spectroscopy analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Schematic chemical structure of the PD-L1-i ligand.
Figure A1. Schematic chemical structure of the PD-L1-i ligand.
Ijms 24 12382 g0a1
Figure A2. Schematic chemical structure of the DOTA-benzene-SCN-PD-L1-i (DOTA-PD-L1-i) ligand.
Figure A2. Schematic chemical structure of the DOTA-benzene-SCN-PD-L1-i (DOTA-PD-L1-i) ligand.
Ijms 24 12382 g0a2
Figure A3. Schematic chemical structure of the HEHA-benzene-SCN-PD-L1-i (HEHA-PD-L1-i) ligand.
Figure A3. Schematic chemical structure of the HEHA-benzene-SCN-PD-L1-i (HEHA-PD-L1-i) ligand.
Ijms 24 12382 g0a3

Appendix B

Figure A4. Microscopic views (×40) of kidney and liver tissues from mice exposed to 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i. Histological staining (H&E) analysis revealed no pathologic changes in the liver and kidney. There was no presence of any form of steatosis, cytoplasmic changes, or necrotic evidence. Hemorrhage and inflammatory infiltrations were absent. No evidence of cytotoxic degeneration was observed in nonparenchymal cells or hepatocytes.
Figure A4. Microscopic views (×40) of kidney and liver tissues from mice exposed to 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i. Histological staining (H&E) analysis revealed no pathologic changes in the liver and kidney. There was no presence of any form of steatosis, cytoplasmic changes, or necrotic evidence. Hemorrhage and inflammatory infiltrations were absent. No evidence of cytotoxic degeneration was observed in nonparenchymal cells or hepatocytes.
Ijms 24 12382 g0a4
Table A1. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in mice after 96 h administration of 3.7 MBq of 177Lu DOTA-PD-L1-i (n = 3) or 3.7 kBq of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i (n = 3) on day 5 after intravenous inoculation of HCC827 lung cancer cells (mean ± standard deviation). No significant differences (p < 0.05) in the ALT, creatinine, and AST values between mice treated with radiopharmaceuticals and those of the control group were found.
Table A1. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in mice after 96 h administration of 3.7 MBq of 177Lu DOTA-PD-L1-i (n = 3) or 3.7 kBq of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i (n = 3) on day 5 after intravenous inoculation of HCC827 lung cancer cells (mean ± standard deviation). No significant differences (p < 0.05) in the ALT, creatinine, and AST values between mice treated with radiopharmaceuticals and those of the control group were found.
Mice GroupAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) (IU/L)Creatinine
(mg/dL)
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) (IU/L)
177Lu DOTA-PD-L1-i68 ± 40.199 ± 0.062143 ± 14
225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i72 ± 50.202 ± 0.053147 ± 18
Control71 ± 70.198 ± 0.057150 ± 13

References

  1. Arneth, B. Tumor microenvironment. Medicina 2019, 56, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Charpentier, M.; Spada, S.; Van Nest, S.J.; Demaria, S. Radiation therapy-induced remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022, 86, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Musetti, S.; Huang, L. Nanoparticle-mediated remodeling of the tumor microenvironment to enhance immunotherapy. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 11740–11755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jailkhani, N.; Ingram, J.R.; Rashidian, M.; Rickelt, S.; Tian, C.; Mak, H.; Jiang, Z.; Ploegh, H.L.; Hynes, R.O. Noninvasive imaging of tumor progression, metastasis, and fibrosis using a nanobody targeting the extracellular matrix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 14181–14190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Demmer, O.; Gourni, E.; Schumacher, U.; Kessler, H.; Wester, H.J. PET imaging of CXCR4 receptors in cancer by a new optimized ligand. ChemMedChem 2011, 6, 1789–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ávila-Sánchez, M.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Jiménez-Mancilla, N.; Ocampo-García, B.; Bravo-Villegas, G.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Azorín-Vega, E.; Aranda-Lara, L.; Isaac-Olivé, K. Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of the 99m Tc-/177 Lu-CXCR4-L theranostic pair for in vivo chemokine-4 receptor-specific targeting. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2020, 324, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mikaeili, A.; Erfani, M.; Shafiei, M.; Kobarfard, F.; Abdi, K.; Sabzevari, O. Development of a 99mTc-labeled CXCR4 antagonist derivative as a new tumor radiotracer. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2018, 33, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Lindner, T.; Loktev, A.; Altmann, A.; Giesel, F.; Kratochwil, C.; Debus, J.; Jäger, D.; Mier, W.; Haberkorn, U. Development of quinoline-based theranostic ligands for the targeting of fibroblast activation protein. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 1415–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Trujillo-Benítez, D.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Ocampo-García, B.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Bravo-Villegas, G.; Morales-Ávila, E.; Cruz-Nova, P.; Díaz-Nieto, L.; García-Quiroz, J. Design, Synthesis and Preclinical Assessment of 99mTc-iFAP for In Vivo Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) Imaging. Molecules 2022, 27, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Loktev, A.; Lindner, T.; Burger, E.-M.; Altmann, A.; Giesel, F.; Kratochwil, C.; Debus, J.; Marmé, F.; Jäger, D.; Mier, W. Development of fibroblast activation protein–targeted radiotracers with improved tumor retention. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60, 1421–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vallejo-Armenta, P.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; García-Pérez, F.O.; Casanova-Triviño, P.; Sandoval-Bonilla, B.; Ocampo-García, B.; Azorín-Vega, E.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M. [99mTc] Tc-iFAP/SPECT Tumor Stroma Imaging: Acquisition and Analysis of Clinical Images in Six Different Cancer Entities. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dabir, M.; Novruzov, E.; Mattes-György, K.; Beu, M.; Dendl, K.; Antke, C.; Koerber, S.; Röhrich, M.; Kratochwil, C.; Debus, J. Distinguishing benign and malignant findings on [68 ga]-FAPI PET/CT based on quantitative SUV measurements. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2023, 25, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ludwig, B.S.; Kessler, H.; Kossatz, S.; Reuning, U. RGD-binding integrins revisited: How recently discovered functions and novel synthetic ligands (re-) shape an ever-evolving field. Cancers 2021, 13, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Van de Wiele, C.; Sathekge, M.; De Spiegeleer, B.; De Jonghe, P.J.; Debruyne, P.R.; Borms, M.; Beels, L.; Maes, A. PSMA expression on neovasculature of solid tumors. Histol. Histopathol. 2020, 35, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. An, S.; Huang, G.; Liu, J.; Wei, W. PSMA-targeted theranostics of solid tumors: Applications beyond prostate cancers. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 49, 3973–3976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hofstetter, G.; Grech, C.; Pils, D.; Pammer, J.; Neudert, B.; Pötsch, N.; Baltzer, P.; Traub-Weidinger, T.; Seebacher, V.; Aust, S. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Expression in Tumor-Associated Neovasculature Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Patients with Ovarian Cancer. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vallejo-Armenta, P.; Soto-Andonaegui, J.; Villanueva-Pérez, R.M.; González-Díaz, J.I.; Contreras-Contreras, K.; Bautista-Wong, C.G.; Sandoval-Bonilla, B.; Nettel-Rueda, B.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Ferro-Flores, G. [99mTc] Tc-iPSMA SPECT brain imaging as a potential specific diagnosis of metastatic brain tumors and high-grade gliomas. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2021, 96, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hernández-Jiménez, T.; Cruz-Nova, P.; Ancira-Cortez, A.; Gibbens-Bandala, B.; Lara-Almazán, N.; Ocampo-García, B.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Morales-Avila, E.; Ferro-Flores, G. Toxicity Assessment of [177Lu]Lu−iFAP/iPSMA Nanoparticles Prepared under GMP-Compliant Radiopharmaceutical Processes. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Ocampo-García, B.; Jiménez-Mancilla, N.; Ancira-Cortez, A.; Trujillo-Benítez, D.; Hernández-Jiménez, T.; Ramírez-Nava, G.; Hernández-Ramírez, R.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Ferro-Flores, G. Targeted Endoradiotherapy with Lu2O3-iPSMA/-iFAP Nanoparticles Activated by Neutron Irradiation: Preclinical Evaluation and First Patient Image. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ocampo-García, B.; Lara, L.A.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Morales-Avila, E.; Isaac-Olivé, K. Role of Nanotechnology in Biological Therapies. Nanomater. Nanotechnol. Med. 2022, 115–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Melendez-Alafort, L.; Ferro-Flores, G.; De Nardo, L.; Ocampo-García, B.; Bolzati, C. Zirconium immune-complexes for PET molecular imaging: Current status and prospects. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 479, 215005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hamid, O.; Robert, C.; Daud, A.; Hodi, F.S.; Hwu, W.-J.; Kefford, R.; Wolchok, J.D.; Hersey, P.; Joseph, R.W.; Weber, J.S. Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti–PD-1) in melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Garassino, M.C.; Gadgeel, S.; Speranza, G.; Felip, E.; Esteban, E.; Dómine, M.; Hochmair, M.J.; Powell, S.F.; Bischoff, H.G.; Peled, N. Pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum in nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer: 5-year outcomes from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41, 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chatterjee, S.; Lesniak, W.G.; Miller, M.S.; Lisok, A.; Sikorska, E.; Wharram, B.; Kumar, D.; Gabrielson, M.; Pomper, M.G.; Gabelli, S.B. Rapid PD-L1 detection in tumors with PET using a highly specific peptide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 483, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. De Silva, R.A.; Kumar, D.; Lisok, A.; Chatterjee, S.; Wharram, B.; Venkateswara Rao, K.; Mease, R.; Dannals, R.F.; Pomper, M.G.; Nimmagadda, S. Peptide-based 68Ga-PET radiotracer for imaging PD-L1 expression in cancer. Mol. Pharm. 2018, 15, 3946–3952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zhou, X.; Jiang, J.; Yang, X.; Liu, T.; Ding, J.; Nimmagadda, S.; Pomper, M.G.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, J.; Yang, Z. First-in-humans evaluation of a PD-L1–binding peptide PET radiotracer in non–small cell lung cancer patients. J. Nucl. Med. 2022, 63, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Krutzek, F.; Kopka, K.; Stadlbauer, S. Development of Radiotracers for Imaging of the PD-1/PD-L1 Axis. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Miller, M.M.; Mapelli, C.; Allen, M.P.; Bowsher, M.S.; Boy, K.M.; Gillis, E.P.; Langley, D.R.; Mull, E.; Poirier, M.A.; Sanghvi, N. Macrocyclic Inhibitors of the pd-1/pd-l1 and cd80 (b7-1)/pd-l1 Protein/Protein Interactions. Bristol Myers Squibb Co. U. S. A. 20161093pp. WO2016039749A1, 17 March 2016. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ferro-Flores, G.; Arteaga de Murphy, C.; Melendez-Alafort, L. Third generation radiopharmaceuticals for imaging and targeted therapy. Curr. Pharm. Anal. 2006, 2, 339–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lacoeuille, F.; Arlicot, N.; Faivre-Chauvet, A. Targeted alpha and beta radiotherapy: An overview of radiopharmaceutical and clinical aspects. Médecine Nucléaire 2018, 42, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deal, K.A.; Davis, I.A.; Mirzadeh, S.; Kennel, S.J.; Brechbiel, M.W. Improved in vivo stability of actinium-225 macrocyclic complexes. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 2988–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Thiele, N.A.; Wilson, J.J. Actinium-225 for Targeted a Therapy: Coordination Chemistry and Current Chelation Approaches. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2018, 33, 336–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hernández-Jiménez, T.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Morales-Ávila, E.; Isaac-Olivé, K.; Ocampo-García, B.; Aranda-Lara, L.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; De Nardo, L.; Rosato, A. 225Ac-rHDL Nanoparticles: A Potential Agent for Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy of Tumors Overexpressing SR-BI Proteins. Molecules 2022, 27, 2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bannik, K.; Madas, B.; Jarzombek, M.; Sutter, A.; Siemeister, G.; Mumberg, D.; Zitzmann-Kolbe, S. Radiobiological effects of the alpha emitter Ra-223 on tumor cells. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Manohar, S.; Kompotiatis, P.; Halfdanarson, T.R.; Hobday, T.J.; Thorpe, M.; Johnson, G.B.; Kendi, A.T.; Leung, N. 177Lu-dotatate use in chronic kidney disease patients: A single center experience. J. Onco-Nephrol. 2021, 5, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, H.; Luo, Q.; Zhang, H.; Ma, X.; Gu, Z.; Gong, Q.; Luo, K. Nanomedicine embraces cancer radio-immunotherapy: Mechanism, design, recent advances, and clinical translation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 47–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abuodeh, Y.; Venkat, P.; Kim, S. Systematic review of case reports on the abscopal effect. Curr. Probl. Cancer 2016, 40, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bellavia, M.C.; Patel, R.B.; Anderson, C.J. Combined Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy and Immune Checkpoint Blockade: From Preclinical Advances to the Clinic. J. Nucl. Med. 2022, 63, 1636–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mass spectrum of the (a) PD-L1-i peptide: cyclo(Ac-Tyr-NMeAla-Asn-Pro-His-Leu-Hyp-Trp-Ser-Trp(Me)-NMeNle-NMeNle-Orn-Cys-Gly-NH2 synthesized as previously reported [28], (b) DOTA-PD-L1-i, and (c) HEHA-PD-L1-i.
Figure 1. Mass spectrum of the (a) PD-L1-i peptide: cyclo(Ac-Tyr-NMeAla-Asn-Pro-His-Leu-Hyp-Trp-Ser-Trp(Me)-NMeNle-NMeNle-Orn-Cys-Gly-NH2 synthesized as previously reported [28], (b) DOTA-PD-L1-i, and (c) HEHA-PD-L1-i.
Ijms 24 12382 g001
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra: (a) PD-L1-i peptide; (b) DOTA-PD-L1-i; (c) HEHA-PD-L1-i.
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra: (a) PD-L1-i peptide; (b) DOTA-PD-L1-i; (c) HEHA-PD-L1-i.
Ijms 24 12382 g002
Figure 3. UV-vis spectra of PD-L1-i peptide, DOTA-PD-L1-I, and HEHA-PD-L1-i.
Figure 3. UV-vis spectra of PD-L1-i peptide, DOTA-PD-L1-I, and HEHA-PD-L1-i.
Ijms 24 12382 g003
Figure 4. Reversed-phase UV-vis/HPLC, 0.1 mg/mL of Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i in aqueous solution, injection of 20 µL, and reversed-phase radio-HPLC chromatogram of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i in water (ascorbic acid/sodium acetate), 37 MBq/mL, injection of 20 µL (inset: 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i stability in water).
Figure 4. Reversed-phase UV-vis/HPLC, 0.1 mg/mL of Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i in aqueous solution, injection of 20 µL, and reversed-phase radio-HPLC chromatogram of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i in water (ascorbic acid/sodium acetate), 37 MBq/mL, injection of 20 µL (inset: 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i stability in water).
Ijms 24 12382 g004
Figure 5. Reversed-phase UV-vis (280 nm)/HPLC, 0.2 mg/mL of HEHA-PD-L1-i in aqueous solution, injection of 20 µL, and reversed-phase HPLC separation of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i in water (ascorbic acid/sodium acetate), 1.85 MBq/mL, injection of 20 µL (graph of collected fractions) (inset: 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i stability in water).
Figure 5. Reversed-phase UV-vis (280 nm)/HPLC, 0.2 mg/mL of HEHA-PD-L1-i in aqueous solution, injection of 20 µL, and reversed-phase HPLC separation of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i in water (ascorbic acid/sodium acetate), 1.85 MBq/mL, injection of 20 µL (graph of collected fractions) (inset: 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i stability in water).
Ijms 24 12382 g005
Figure 6. (a) In vitro 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i uptake in C6 mouse glioma cancer cells (PD-L1 negative control) and HCC827 human lung cancer cells (PD-L1 positive control) (n = 6). * Significant difference, p < 0.05; Student’s t-test. Microscopic fields (40x) of immunofluorescent staining for PD-L1 in (b) HCC827 (PD-L1+) cells (merged images: PD-L1 stained green with anti-PD-L1 and nuclei stained blue with DAPI) and (c) C6 cells negative for PD-L1 expression (merged images: anti-PD-L1 green and DAPI blue for nuclei staining).
Figure 6. (a) In vitro 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i uptake in C6 mouse glioma cancer cells (PD-L1 negative control) and HCC827 human lung cancer cells (PD-L1 positive control) (n = 6). * Significant difference, p < 0.05; Student’s t-test. Microscopic fields (40x) of immunofluorescent staining for PD-L1 in (b) HCC827 (PD-L1+) cells (merged images: PD-L1 stained green with anti-PD-L1 and nuclei stained blue with DAPI) and (c) C6 cells negative for PD-L1 expression (merged images: anti-PD-L1 green and DAPI blue for nuclei staining).
Ijms 24 12382 g006
Figure 7. Microscopic field (40×) of immunofluorescent staining for PD-L1 with the (a) Cy7-labeled PD-L1-i in HCC827 (PD-L1+) cells; (b) DAPI staining; (c) merged image: PD-L1 stained red with Cy7-PD-L1-i and nuclei stained blue with DAPI.
Figure 7. Microscopic field (40×) of immunofluorescent staining for PD-L1 with the (a) Cy7-labeled PD-L1-i in HCC827 (PD-L1+) cells; (b) DAPI staining; (c) merged image: PD-L1 stained red with Cy7-PD-L1-i and nuclei stained blue with DAPI.
Ijms 24 12382 g007
Figure 8. Representative histograms of the HCC827 cell viability assay obtained using flow cytometry: (a) control (no treatment): basal viability of the cell population (78.9% of live cells); (b) viability after treatment with PD-L1-i (0.1 µg) for 5-h (74.4% of live cells); (c) viability after treatment (acute dose of 15 Gy/5 h) with 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i (49.0% of live cells; the net decrease in alive cells regarding the control group was 30%); (d) viability after treatment (acute dose of 5 Gy/5 h) with 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i (36.0% of live cells; the net decrease in alive cells regarding the control group was 43%).
Figure 8. Representative histograms of the HCC827 cell viability assay obtained using flow cytometry: (a) control (no treatment): basal viability of the cell population (78.9% of live cells); (b) viability after treatment with PD-L1-i (0.1 µg) for 5-h (74.4% of live cells); (c) viability after treatment (acute dose of 15 Gy/5 h) with 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i (49.0% of live cells; the net decrease in alive cells regarding the control group was 30%); (d) viability after treatment (acute dose of 5 Gy/5 h) with 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i (36.0% of live cells; the net decrease in alive cells regarding the control group was 43%).
Ijms 24 12382 g008
Figure 9. (a) Biodistribution profile in healthy mice of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i; (b) biokinetic models of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i in the three target tissues: lung (invaded by HCC827 lung cancer cells), liver, and kidney.
Figure 9. (a) Biodistribution profile in healthy mice of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i; (b) biokinetic models of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i in the three target tissues: lung (invaded by HCC827 lung cancer cells), liver, and kidney.
Ijms 24 12382 g009
Figure 10. (a) Biodistribution profile in healthy mice of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i; (b) biokinetic models of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-I in the three target tissues: lung (invaded by HCC827 lung cancer cells), liver, and kidney.
Figure 10. (a) Biodistribution profile in healthy mice of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i; (b) biokinetic models of 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-I in the three target tissues: lung (invaded by HCC827 lung cancer cells), liver, and kidney.
Ijms 24 12382 g010
Figure 11. In vivo and ex vivo radioisotopic/X-ray images of athymic mice with lung micrometastases at different times after 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i administration: (a) whole-body imaging; (b,d,f) X-ray images; (c,e,g) merged radioisotopic and X-ray images of kidneys (on the upper left side), lung (in the middle), and liver (on the lower right side). Note that the highest radioactivity accumulated in the lungs at all times examined (30 min, 24 and 72 h).
Figure 11. In vivo and ex vivo radioisotopic/X-ray images of athymic mice with lung micrometastases at different times after 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i administration: (a) whole-body imaging; (b,d,f) X-ray images; (c,e,g) merged radioisotopic and X-ray images of kidneys (on the upper left side), lung (in the middle), and liver (on the lower right side). Note that the highest radioactivity accumulated in the lungs at all times examined (30 min, 24 and 72 h).
Ijms 24 12382 g011
Figure 12. Ex vivo lungs from a mouse with lung micrometastases and injected with 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i: (a) X-ray image; (c) merged radioisotopic/X-ray images; (e) lung parenchyma histological staining (H&E). Ex vivo lungs from an untreated mouse (control: without induced lung micrometastases) and injected with 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i: (b) X-ray image; (d) merged radioisotopic/X-ray images; (f) lung parenchyma histological staining (H&E).
Figure 12. Ex vivo lungs from a mouse with lung micrometastases and injected with 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i: (a) X-ray image; (c) merged radioisotopic/X-ray images; (e) lung parenchyma histological staining (H&E). Ex vivo lungs from an untreated mouse (control: without induced lung micrometastases) and injected with 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i: (b) X-ray image; (d) merged radioisotopic/X-ray images; (f) lung parenchyma histological staining (H&E).
Ijms 24 12382 g012
Table 1. Total nuclear transformations (N) and radiation absorbed dose in target organs of athymic mice produced by 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i.
Table 1. Total nuclear transformations (N) and radiation absorbed dose in target organs of athymic mice produced by 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i.
Organ177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i
N = t = 0 t = A t d t
M B q · h
Radiation
Absorbed Dose
m G y / M B q
N = t = 0 t = A t d t
M B q · h
Radiation
Absorbed Dose
m G y / B q
Lung (HCC827 cancer cells)59.343.018.95.15
Kidney10.94.2011.14.83
Liver9.670.8511.51.44
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Cruz-Nova, P.; Jiménez-Mancilla, N.; Oros-Pantoja, R.; Lara-Almazán, N.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Azorín-Vega, E.; Ocampo-García, B.; Ferro-Flores, G. Synthesis and Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i as Potential Radiopharmaceuticals for Tumor Microenvironment-Targeted Radiotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512382

AMA Style

Luna-Gutiérrez M, Cruz-Nova P, Jiménez-Mancilla N, Oros-Pantoja R, Lara-Almazán N, Santos-Cuevas C, Azorín-Vega E, Ocampo-García B, Ferro-Flores G. Synthesis and Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i as Potential Radiopharmaceuticals for Tumor Microenvironment-Targeted Radiotherapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(15):12382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512382

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luna-Gutiérrez, Myrna, Pedro Cruz-Nova, Nallely Jiménez-Mancilla, Rigoberto Oros-Pantoja, Nancy Lara-Almazán, Clara Santos-Cuevas, Erika Azorín-Vega, Blanca Ocampo-García, and Guillermina Ferro-Flores. 2023. "Synthesis and Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i as Potential Radiopharmaceuticals for Tumor Microenvironment-Targeted Radiotherapy" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 15: 12382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512382

APA Style

Luna-Gutiérrez, M., Cruz-Nova, P., Jiménez-Mancilla, N., Oros-Pantoja, R., Lara-Almazán, N., Santos-Cuevas, C., Azorín-Vega, E., Ocampo-García, B., & Ferro-Flores, G. (2023). Synthesis and Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-PD-L1-i and 225Ac-HEHA-PD-L1-i as Potential Radiopharmaceuticals for Tumor Microenvironment-Targeted Radiotherapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(15), 12382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512382

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop