Next Article in Journal
Effects of Early Exposure to Isoflurane on Susceptibility to Chronic Pain Are Mediated by Increased Neural Activity Due to Actions of the Mammalian Target of the Rapamycin Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Transcription Factor Zbtb20 as a Regulator of Malignancy and Its Practical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Targeting SOX18 Transcription Factor Activity by Small-Molecule Inhibitor Sm4 in Non-Small Lung Cancer Cell Lines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploring the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Unraveling Signaling Complexity and Therapeutic Implications

Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(18), 13764; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241813764
Submission received: 23 August 2023 / Revised: 4 September 2023 / Accepted: 5 September 2023 / Published: 6 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Targeted Therapy in Cancer)

Abstract

:
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) continues to pose a substantial global health challenge due to its high incidence and limited therapeutic options. In recent years, the Janus Kinase (JAK) and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) pathway has emerged as a critical signaling cascade in HCC pathogenesis. The review commences with an overview of the JAK/STAT pathway, delving into the dynamic interplay between the JAK/STAT pathway and its numerous upstream activators, such as cytokines and growth factors enriched in pathogenic livers afflicted with chronic inflammation and cirrhosis. This paper also elucidates how the persistent activation of JAK/STAT signaling leads to diverse oncogenic processes during hepatocarcinogenesis, including uncontrolled cell proliferation, evasion of apoptosis, and immune escape. In the context of therapeutic implications, this review summarizes recent advancements in targeting the JAK/STAT pathway for HCC treatment. Preclinical and clinical studies investigating inhibitors and modulators of JAK/STAT signaling are discussed, highlighting their potential in suppressing the deadly disease. The insights presented herein underscore the necessity for continued research into targeting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway as a promising avenue for HCC therapy.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) stands as the predominant primary liver malignancy, constituting approximately 85% to 90% of all cases. It continues to be a substantial global health concern due to its increasing incidence and the limited therapeutic options available [1,2,3]. According to data from the Global Cancer Statistics (GLOBOCAN 2020, available at https://gco.iarc.fr (accessed on 1 August 2021), there are 906,000 new cases of liver cancer and 830,000 liver cancer-related fatalities annually worldwide [4]. The highest incidence and mortality rates of HCC are notably concentrated in East Asia, although there is a mounting trend of HCC incidence and mortality in various regions of Europe and the United States. The data further delineate regional disparities, with approximately 657,000 cases occurring in Asia, with more than half of them arising in China. Europe registers 90,000 cases, while Africa records 70,000, North America 50,000, Latin America and the Caribbean 40,000, and Oceania 5000 cases annually. The annual mortalities due to HCC likewise follow a similar geographical distribution, with the highest figures seen in Eastern Asia and Europe, accounting for 669,000 and 79,000 deaths, respectively. This is followed by Africa (67,000), Latin America and the Caribbean (38,000), North America (35,000), and Oceania (4000). In terms of 5-year prevalence data, the pattern remains consistent, with the majority of patients, approximately 74% out of a total of 995,000, residing in Asia, followed by Europe at 8.6%, Africa at 8.4%, North America at 5%, Latin America and the Caribbean at 4%, and Oceania at 0.4%.
In the context of therapeutic interventions for HCC, surgical resection and local ablation therapy are preferred for early-stage HCC. Nonetheless, the incidence of recurrence within a five-year period following such therapeutic interventions can be as high as 70% [1,3]. In the case of advanced HCC, the recommended treatment option is the systemic molecular target therapy [1,2]. Within this realm, an array of small-molecule compounds has undergone evaluation in patients afflicted with HCC, with a particular focus on targeting receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) [5]. As of current knowledge, however, the clinical outcomes from RTK-targeting molecular therapies have yielded results that are less than entirely satisfactory. A prominent example is sorafenib, which stands as the foremost compound among RTK inhibitors currently administered to HCC patients; nevertheless, its therapeutic benefits for individuals with HCC have shown limitations [6,7].
Given the profound diversities intrinsic to the molecular landscape of HCC and the formidable challenges entailed in devising universally effective therapeutic strategies for this disease, the identification of molecular signaling pathways perturbed in HCC assumes fundamental importance in developing therapeutic targets as a personalized medical approach [8,9]. In the majority of HCC cases, the presence of chronic hepatic inflammation and cirrhosis is concomitant, often induced by diverse etiological factors such as chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, alcohol abuse, diabetes, obesity, and hepatic lipid accumulation, among others [1,2]. In a chronically injured liver, there is an aberrant augmentation of inflammatory cells and inflammatory responses, which, in turn, fosters a tumorigenic microenvironment and activates various oncogenic molecular signaling pathways [10,11].
A multitude of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including various interleukins, growth factors, and interferons, are elevated in livers with chronic inflammation [10,12], favoring the activation of the Janus Kinase (JAK) and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) pathway, commonly referred to as the JAK/STAT pathway. Extracellular signals from a plethora of cytokines are translated via the JAK/STAT pathway into intracellular responses governing various cellular processes, such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and immune response [13,14]. In the context of HCC, the aberrant activation of the JAK/STAT pathway has garnered significant attention due to its profound impact on tumorigenesis, metastasis, angiogenesis, and immune evasion [15].
This review paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the role of the JAK/STAT pathway in HCC. We will explore the implications of JAK/STAT pathway dysregulation in HCC, which is triggered by a variety of cytokines. Additionally, we will discuss the results from recent preclinical and clinical studies that target the JAK/STAT signaling cascade as a potential therapeutic approach for treating HCC.

2. JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway

2.1. Overview of JAK/STAT Signaling

The JAK/STAT pathway is a vital cellular cascade that controls a wide range of processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [16,17]. Its significance is particularly pronounced in modulating immune and inflammatory responses [18,19]. Additionally, it plays a role in hematopoiesis and the functioning of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) [20,21,22]. Notably, the JAK/STAT pathway contributes to diverse liver functions, such as hepatic proliferation, regeneration, hepatoprotection, and metabolic processes such as gluconeogenesis [23,24]. This signaling pathway also plays a crucial role in various stages of tumorigenesis, including epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis. Moreover, it is highly associated with the generation and maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which play pivotal roles in therapy resistance and metastasis [25,26].
The activation of this pathway begins when specific cytokines, such as interleukins, interferons, or growth factors, bind to their corresponding cell surface receptors [27]. These receptors are often physically associated with JAKs, which possess tyrosine kinase activity. Upon cytokine binding, a conformational change induces the dimerization of the receptor molecules, leading to the transphosphorylation and activation of JAKs that are noncovalently attached to the receptors (Figure 1). Activated JAKs phosphorylate tyrosine residues at the cytoplasmic tail of the receptor, and this event, in turn, recruits the STAT protein family to the receptor by creating docking sites for STATs, which have Src homology 2 (SH2) domains. Once recruited to the receptor, STAT proteins are phosphorylated by JAKs at specific tyrosine residues, leading to their dimerization. These phosphorylated and dimerized STATs can now translocate into the nucleus, where they regulate the expression of their target genes (Figure 1).

2.2. JAKs and STATs

There are four types of JAK proteins, JAK 1, 2, 3, and tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2), as well as seven types of STAT proteins, STAT 1, 2, 3, 4, 5A, 5B, and 6. Although their roles differ slightly, they share common structures. Each JAK protein consists of seven homology domains known as Janus homology (JH) domains [28]. These seven JH domains are divided into four functional domains. The kinase domain, corresponding to JH domain 1, is responsible for the kinase activity, providing the ATP binding site [29]. The pseudokinase domain, containing JH domain 2, shares structural similarity with the kinase domain but does not participate in kinase activity. Instead, this domain facilitates interactions between JAK and STAT molecules. The SH2 domain and the four-point one, ezrin, radixin, moesin (FERM) domain regulate protein–protein interactions, including the noncovalent attachment of JAK to cytokine receptors [14,30]. While the SH2 domain typically recognizes and binds to phosphotyrosine residues, there is a perspective that the SH2 domain in JAK differs from the standard SH2 domain because JAK can bind to cytokine receptors without relevant phosphotyrosine residues. Instead, it is speculated that the SH2 domain in JAK acts as a scaffold [31]. The FERM domain mediates protein interactions with membrane-associated proteins [31,32].
STAT proteins consist of several domains: N-terminal domain, coiled-coil domain, DNA-binding domain (DBD), linker domain, SH2 domain, and transcription activation domain (TAD) [14,29]. The N-terminal domain plays a crucial role in the dimerization and phosphorylation of STAT [31,33]. The coiled-coil domain is involved in nuclear import and export. The DBD facilitates binding to the target DNA sequence. The linker domain connects the DBD and the SH2 domain, providing structural support [34]. The SH2 domain of STATs recognizes the phosphotyrosine residue in the cytoplasmic tail of cytokine receptors, which is phosphorylated by JAK following ligand-mediated receptor dimerization (Figure 1). The binding of STATs to cytokine receptors through the interaction between the SH2 domain and phosphotyrosine residues renders STATs physically proximal to JAK. This proximity enables JAK to efficiently phosphorylate STAT, leading to dimer formation and nuclear import of the transcriptional factors [28,29,34]. Inside the nucleus, the activated STAT dimers interact with specific DNA sequences called STAT response elements (SREs) in the promoters or enhancers of target genes. This interaction triggers transcriptional activation, leading to the expression of genes that modulate essential cellular functions, including growth, differentiation, and homeostasis (Table 1).

2.3. Cytokines Activating the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway

Various ligands trigger the initiation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, with cytokines being one of the most representative examples. Cytokines are small molecules secreted by a variety of cells that facilitate interactions and communication between cells [39]. They play a pivotal role in mediating a wide range of cellular functions, including cell growth, adhesion, differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis, as well as the regulation of immunity and inflammatory responses. Cytokines have been intensively studied in the context of cancer as well [40]. Cytokines known to ignite the JAK/STAT signaling pathway encompass interleukins (IL), colony-stimulating factors, growth factors (GFs), and interferons (IFN) [37,41,42] (See Table 2).
The IL-2 family cytokines, including IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21, engage their respective receptors, which consist of heterodimeric or heterotrimeric complexes composed of various cytokine-specific receptor chains. Upon ligand binding, these receptors undergo conformational changes that facilitate the recruitment and activation of JAK family members, primarily JAK1 and JAK3 [43,44]. These receptor-associated JAKs phosphorylate each other and the cytoplasmic tails of cytokine receptors, creating docking sites for STATs. Notably, the IL-2 family cytokines activate specific STAT proteins, such as STAT5 for IL-2, IL-15, and IL-21, and STAT6 for IL-4 [44,45,46]. This culminates in the transcriptional regulation of genes critical for cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, and immune responses [28,38].
The IL-6 family of cytokines, including IL-6, IL-11, IL-27, IL-31, and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), engages their cognate receptors, which generally consist of gp130 as a common receptor subunit, along with specific ligand-binding receptor chains [47,48]. IL-6 family proteins induce the activation of JAK1 and JAK2 primarily, as well as tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) for some members such as IL-6 and IL-11. Notably, the IL-6 family cytokines predominantly lead to the activation of STAT3 [23,49,50,51,52]. It is worth noting that certain members, such as IL-27, can also activate STAT1, influencing specific immune responses [53,54].
Table 2. Ligands triggering the activation of JAK/STAT signaling in HCC.
Table 2. Ligands triggering the activation of JAK/STAT signaling in HCC.
LigandJAKSTATReference
IL-2 family
(IL-2, 4, 7, 9, 15, 21)
JAK1, JAK3STAT1, STAT3, STAT5, STAT6[27,36,55,56,57]
IL-6 family
(IL-6, 11, 27, 31, LIF)
JAK1, JAK2, TYK2STAT1, STAT3[27,36,55,56,58]
IL-10 family
(IL-10, 19, 20, 22, 24, 26)
JAK1, TYK2STAT1, STAT3, STAT5[27,36,59,60,61]
IL-12 family
(IL-12, 23)
JAK2STAT3, STAT4[36,55,56]
IL-17 family
(IL-17A-F)
JAK2STAT3[62,63]
β common cytokine family
(IL-3, 5, GM-CSF)
JAK2STAT3, STAT5[27,36,55,56]
Hematopoietic growth factors (EPO, G-CSF, TPO)JAK2STAT3, STAT5[36,55,56,57]
Type1 IFN (α, β)JAK1, TYK2STAT1, STAT2[36,37,55,56,58]
Type2 IFN (γ)JAK1, JAK2STAT1[27,36,37,55,56,57,58]
The table lists cytokines, growth factors, and interferons that are predominantly enriched in HCC. It also provides information about the major JAKs and STATs affected by each type of ligand.
The IL-10 family includes IL-10 itself, as well as IL-19, IL-20, IL-22, IL-24, and IL-26. These cytokines engage specific receptor complexes, typically composed of receptor subunits such as IL-10R1, IL-10R2, and IL-22R1 [64]. Upon ligand binding, the receptor complex activates JAK1 and TYK2, in particular. The IL-10 family cytokines predominantly activate STAT3, in addition to STAT1 and STAT5 [65,66,67,68]. Similarly, the IL-12 family, consisting of IL-12 and IL-23, leads to the activation of JAK2. IL-12 predominantly signals through STAT4, while IL-23 induces STAT3 phosphorylation [69,70]. The IL-17 family cytokines, which include IL-17A, IL-17B, IL-17C, IL-17D, IL-17E (also known as IL-25), and IL-17F, trigger JAK/STAT signaling cascade through the activation of JAK2 and STAT3 [62,63].
The β common cytokine family includes cytokines such as IL-3, IL-5, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), which share a common β subunit (CD131) in their receptor complexes [71]. The ligand–receptor complex primarily activates JAK2. The β common cytokines mainly activate STAT5, which becomes phosphorylated, dimerizes, and translocates into the nucleus to drive gene expression [72]. Additionally, these cytokines can also induce activation of STAT3 to varying degrees [73,74].
Hematopoietic GFs, including erythropoietin (EPO), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and thrombopoietin (TPO), engage their respective receptors to initiate signal transduction cascades. These receptors typically consist of single or multiple subunits, with some sharing the common β subunit (CD131), and predominantly activate JAK2, leading to the activation of specific members of STATs [20,22,75,76,77,78,79]. For instance, EPO activates JAK2 and STAT5, while G-CSF triggers JAK2 activation and subsequent STAT3 phosphorylation, stimulating the proliferation and differentiation of granulocyte lineage cells. TPO, engaging JAK2, primarily activates STAT3, promoting the development and maturation of platelets.
Type 1 IFNs, including IFN-α and IFN-β, are produced in response to viral infections and engage a heterodimeric receptor complex composed of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 subunits. Upon ligand binding, this receptor complex triggers the activation of JAK1 and TYK2. These JAKs primarily phosphorylate STAT1 and, to a lesser extent, STAT2 [80]. On the other hand, Type 2 IFN, mainly IFN-γ, engages a receptor complex consisting of IFNGR1 and IFNGR2 subunits. Ligand binding leads to the activation of JAK1 and JAK2, which phosphorylate STAT1, leading to the formation of homodimers or heterodimers with STAT3 [81].

2.4. Receptors and Negative Regulators of the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway

Initiation of JAK/STAT signaling occurs when the aforementioned ligands, primarily cytokines, bind to transmembrane receptors. The types of transmembrane receptors involved in the JAK/STAT pathway include cytokine receptors, G-protein coupled receptors, and growth factor receptors [82]. Given the diverse range of ligands that induce JAK/STAT signaling transduction, there exists a multitude of receptors. These receptors can be categorized into Class I and Class II receptors [31,32,64].
Class I receptors feature conserved pairs of cysteines connected by disulfide bonds. This class of receptors is further divided into the glycoprotein 130 (gp130) family, the γ chain family, the β chain family, the single-chain family, receptor tyrosine kinases, and other interleukin receptors. Within the glycoprotein 130 (gp130) family, members include the IL-6R family (IL-6R, IL-11R, IL-12R, IL-23R), the G-CSF receptor, and the leukemia inhibitory factor receptor chain (LIFR). The interaction of gp130 with JAK1, JAK2, and TYK2 leads to the activation of STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5. Additionally, the γ chain family encompasses receptors for the IL-2 family (IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21). Another subset of Class I receptors is the β chain family, which involves IL-3R, IL-5R, and the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) receptor [83]. The single-chain family, characterized by homomeric receptors, includes receptors such as the thrombopoietin receptor (TPOR), erythropoietin receptor (EPOR), prolactin receptor (PRLR), and growth hormone receptor (GHR), linked with JAK2 and STAT5. On the other hand, Class II receptors are divided into antiviral and nonantiviral categories. The antiviral subset primarily engages with interferons (IFNs), while the nonantiviral subset includes receptors for IL-10 family cytokines such as IL-10, IL-20, IL-22, and IL-24. This comprehensive classification sheds light on the intricate landscape of JAK-STAT signaling receptors and their connections.
The JAK/STAT signaling pathway is crucial for transmitting signals from cell surface receptors, primarily those of cytokines, to the nucleus, where it regulates the expression of numerous genes involved in various cellular processes. To maintain appropriate cellular responses, the pathway requires tight regulation. In addition to the numerous activators of this signaling pathway, including various growth factors and cytokines, there are negative regulators that play a vital role in inhibiting the JAK/STAT pathway. There are three categories of negative regulators: suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS), protein inhibitors of activated STAT (PIAS), and protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) (Figure 1).
The SOCS family encompasses eight distinct protein members: cytokine-inducible SH2 domain protein (CISH), SOCS1, SOCS2, SOCS3, SOCS4, SOCS5, SOCS6, and SOCS7. The SOCS proteins bind to the activation loop within the kinase domain of JAK or the cytoplasmic tail of the receptor. For instance, SOCS1 binds to activated JAKs, while SOCS3 binds to tyrosine residues on receptors. This binding efficiently blocks the phosphorylation of the receptor by JAKs [14]. Additionally, SOCS proteins function as E3 ubiquitin ligases and mediate ubiquitination-driven degradation of signaling components of the JAK/STAT pathway [84,85]. The PIAS family consists of four protein members: PIAS1, PIAS2 (PIASx), PIAS3, and PIAS4 (PIASy). These molecules have been shown to inhibit the JAK/STAT signaling pathway by preventing STAT transcription factors from binding to their target genes [29,33]. Each PIAS protein interacts with a specific type of STAT protein. For example, PIAS1 inhibits the binding of STAT1 to DNA [86]. The final group consists of protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs). Given the significance of phosphorylation within the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, removing phosphate groups from tyrosine residues significantly affects the transmission of the signal. The prominent proteins in this category are SH2 domain-containing phosphatase-1 (SHP-1), SH2 domain-containing phosphatase-2 (SHP-2), and CD45 [87]. SHP proteins are involved in dephosphorylating both JAKs and STATs, with SHP-2 specifically interacting with STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 [87]. CD45 is responsible for removing phosphates that are attached to JAKs [29].

3. Roles of JAK/STAT Signaling in HCC

3.1. Dysregulation of the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway in Human HCC

The JAK/STAT signaling pathway, activated by numerous cytokines and growth factors, serves as a central communication hub in cellular activities [14,88]. Components of the JAK/STAT signaling can also affect the expression of a plethora of genes via epigenetic modifications of chromatin. For example, JAK2 directly phosphorylates Tyr 41 on histone H3, which prevents the binding of heterochromatin protein 1alpha (HP1alpha) [89]. Aberrant activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway confers malignant properties on cancer cells by dysregulating cellular proliferation and survival, as well as enhancing stem cell properties and inflammatory responses. The JAK/STAT signaling also promotes invasion and metastasis of cancer cells, partly achieved through the activation of the EMT [90]. In addition, this pathway is involved in creating an immunosuppressive microenvironment [23,91].
The signals from the JAK/STAT pathway are carried out by the STAT transcription factors. In HCC, STAT3 is the major oncogenic player in various aspects of carcinogenesis. Genes that are transcriptionally activated by STAT3 in HCC include CCND1 (encoding Cyclin D1), BCL2, BIRC5 (encoding Survivin), HIF-1α, VEGF, CD133 (encoding Prominin-1), NANOG, IL-10, TWIST, MMP9, etc. [92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99]. These target genes of STAT3 play critical roles in hepatocarcinogenesis by promoting cell cycle progression, inhibiting apoptosis, stimulating angiogenesis, maintaining CSCs, inducing immunosuppression, triggering EMT, and promoting metastasis (see Figure 2). Although controversial, other STAT proteins, notably STAT5, are also considered to exert similar tumor-promoting effects on HCC [88,100].

3.2. Frequencies of JAK and STAT Mutations Found in Human HCC

Although human HCCs display dysregulation of the JAK/STAT signaling in approximately 50–60% of the cases, mutations in the components of the signaling cascade have been infrequently identified [101]. Activating mutations in IL6ST encoding the gp130 receptor can lead to phosphorylation of STAT3 in the absence of ligand binding [102]. Mutations in IL6ST, however, are found in less than 3% of HCC patients (Figure 3).
Various point mutations in JAK1 have been observed in HCC, which lead to phosphorylation of JAK1 and STAT3 without the upstream stimulus [103]. For example, the mutation in codon 703 substituting isoleucine for the serine residue in JAK1 activates the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo without the ligand–receptor interaction [104]. However, mutations in JAK1 are found in only 3% of HCC patients. Furthermore, mutations in the genes encoding other JAK proteins are found even less frequently than those in JAK1, undermining the contribution of JAK mutants to HCC (Figure 3). Activating mutations in STAT3 are predominantly found in the SH2 domain of STAT3, resulting in ligand-independent dimerization and phosphorylation of STAT3 [105,106]. Although STAT3 is phosphorylated in approximately 60% of patients with HCC, mutations in STAT3 are found in as low as 1% of human HCC. Mutations in other STAT proteins are found in less than 1% of patients with HCC (Figure 3).

3.3. Activation of the JAK/STAT Signaling via Downregulation of Negative Regulators

Although the frequencies of mutations in the major components of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway are found very low, abnormal activation of the JAK/STAT pathway is frequently found in HCC. Analysis of protein expression data from the Human Protein Atlas indicates that STAT3 exhibits the highest levels of expression within the JAK/STAT pathway proteins in HCC. Approximately 60% of HCC samples demonstrated activated STAT3 [91,107]. This suggests that apart from genetic mutations, alternative mechanisms should exist to promote the persistent activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in HCC, such as overproduction of upstream ligands (e.g., cytokines and growth factors) or downregulation of negative regulators of the pathway.
Suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins function as inhibitors of the JAK/STAT signaling (Figure 1). SOCS hinder the ability of STAT proteins to bind with JAK and subsequently modulates the signaling pathways triggered by cytokines, thus suppressing the phosphorylation of STAT by JAK. SOCS can also suppress the JAK/STAT signaling by acting as ubiquitin ligases, leading to proteasomal degradation of JAK [90]. Hypermethylation and gene silencing of SOCS have been frequently observed in subsets of HCC, notably in hepatitis B virus-related HCC, with a frequency ranging from 40.9% to 67% [108,109]. Similarly, downregulation of other negative regulators such as PIA and SHP via promoter hypermethylation has been observed in HCC [110,111].

3.4. Overproduction of Inflammatory Cytokines Activating JAK/STAT Signaling in HCC

The livers of HCC patients are often infiltrated with different types of inflammatory cells that secrete various types of cytokines, growth factors, chemokines, and other molecules [50,112]. Dysregulated production of inflammatory cytokines is considered a major trigger for HCC carcinogenesis and tumor progression [113]. Among the numerous inflammatory cytokines associated with the activation of the JAK/STAT signaling in HCC, this review focuses on IL-6 family cytokines, IL-10 family cytokines, IL-23 as a member of IL-12 family cytokines, and IL-17, which play critical roles in the pathogenesis of HCC (Figure 4).

3.4.1. IL-6 Family (IL-6, IL-11, IL-27, LIF)

IL-6 family cytokines, which activate the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, have been linked to the initiation and progression of HCC [50]. Both T cells and macrophages secrete IL-6 [114], and its expression plays a role in the growth, invasion, and progression of various cancer types, including HCC [115,116,117]. Elevated levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) have been documented in the bloodstream across various hepatic disorders susceptible to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [118]. Elevated serum IL-6 levels have shown a positive correlation with an increased propensity for HCC development [119]. Moreover, individuals with HCC display elevated serum levels of both IL-6 and the IL-6 receptor [120]. Besides its oncogenic properties conferred on tumor cells through the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, IL-6 promotes PD-L1 expression in monocytes and macrophages in human HCC, contributing to immunosuppression in patients [114]. Similarly, IL-27 is significantly increased in HCC patients [50]. IL-27 plays a role in regulating inflammation within the tumor microenvironment and influences the proliferation, survival, and invasiveness of tumor cells. These effects are mediated through downstream signaling pathways, notably the JAK/STAT3 pathway [121]. Another IL-6 family cytokine, LIF, has also been observed to be significantly upregulated in HCC [122].

3.4.2. IL-10 Family (IL-10, IL-19, IL-20, IL-22, IL-24)

Interleukin-10 (IL-10) family cytokines play a pivotal role in the progression of liver diseases. Beyond their diverse immunoregulatory functions, IL-10 influences susceptibility to HCV infection and hepatic fibrogenesis [123,124]. A study revealed higher IL-10 secretion in liver cancer cells compared to normal hepatocytes [125]. In terms of anti-inflammatory response, IL-10 binds to its receptor complex (IL10R1, IL10R2), which associates with JAK1 and TYK2, subsequently engaging STAT3 as a transcription factor [126]. IL-10 levels were found to be positively correlated with p-STAT3 levels. IL-10 serves as a critical negative regulator of NK cell activity. The release of IL-10 by HCC cells activates the STAT3 signaling pathway in NK cells, inhibiting their killing activity. This results in promotion of HCC recurrence and metastasis [127]. Inhibiting STAT3 in HCC cells led to decreased production of immunosuppressive IL-10 cytokines and reduced the number of regulatory T (Treg) cells, thereby alleviating their combined inhibitory effect on NK cells [128].
Despite sharing structural similarities and utilizing similar or partially identical receptors, different members of the IL-10 family exhibit distinct biological functions [129,130]. Interleukin-19 (IL-19) triggers its own expression (auto-induction) and the expression of other pro-inflammatory cytokines, leading to the activation of cell apoptosis. It specifically targets hepatocytes and stimulates the production of TNF-α and IL-10 [131]. IL-19 is also involved in liver disease-associated wound healing, serving as an initial step in processes such as fibrogenesis and cirrhosis, which subsequently promote compensatory proliferation of hepatocytes [132]. In primary murine hepatocytes, IL-19 binds to the IL-20R1/IL-20R2 heteroreceptor complex, activating STAT3 and triggering cell proliferation [133,134]. STAT3 plays a dominant role in negatively regulating the immune response, as well as governing cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, and tumor development and metastasis [14].
IL-20 signals through its binding to either IL-22R/IL-20R2 or IL-20R1/IL-20R2. Both of these heterodimer receptor complexes activate the JAK/STAT pathway. Interestingly, the presence of constitutive IL-20R2 expression on hepatocytes alone is enough to activate STAT3 [135,136]. IL-20 plays a crucial role in the development of liver injury. In liver biopsies from patients with fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, IL-20 levels were significantly elevated in hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells compared to normal liver tissue from healthy individuals [137]. IL-20 shows a positive correlation with cyclin D1 expression in both HCC patients and human HCC cell lines [138]. Moreover, the treatment with an anti-IL-20 monoclonal antibody effectively hindered HCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and demonstrated the suppression of liver tumor growth in vivo [139].

3.4.3. IL-23 and IL-17

IL-23 belongs to the IL-12 family of cytokines and acts as a crucial molecular link between tumor-promoting pro-inflammatory processes and the impairment of adaptive immune surveillance [140]. Upon binding to its receptor IL-23R, JAK2 and TYK2 are activated, leading to subsequent STAT3 phosphorylation [141]. In the context of HCC, IL-23 plays a pivotal role in promoting cancer growth, progression, and metastasis. It also diminishes CD8+ cell infiltration in tumors while enhancing the immunosuppressive function of Treg cells. Moreover, elevated IL-23 expression levels in HCC are correlated with advanced TNM stage and metastasis [142].
Interleukin-17 (IL-17), which exhibits increased expression in HCC, can facilitate the invasion and migration of HCC cells [62,143]. The tumor-promoting effects of IL-17 and its receptor IL-17R are achieved through direct influence on tumor cells via the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3-related pathway. Aberrantly activated STAT3 in HCC cells, in turn, leads to the upregulation of IL-17 [144]. IL-17 plays a vital role in attracting neutrophils to the peritumoral stroma of HCC tissues and promoting pro-angiogenic activity in HCC cells [145]. The interaction between IL-17 and IFN-γ has significant effects on HCC cell apoptosis and growth in both in vitro and in vivo settings. IL-17 counteracts the antitumor effects of IFN-γ in HCC cells, thereby promoting HCC development [63].

4. In Vitro and In Vivo Studies Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling in HCC

As discussed above, the upregulation of JAK/STAT signaling significantly contributes to the increased proliferation, migration, and invasion of HCC cells. Furthermore, this up-regulation leads to enhanced cell survival and metastasis. Given that the JAK/STAT signaling pathway exerts strong tumor-promoting effects on HCC, it is reasonable to consider inhibiting the pathway for the treatment of HCC. In vitro investigations have consistently indicated that inhibiting JAK/STAT activity results in increased apoptosis in HCC cells, thereby reducing cell survival. Similarly, in vivo preclinical studies have also convincingly demonstrated that blocking JAK/STAT activity can effectively impede tumor growth or even delay the progression of tumors.

4.1. In Vitro Studies Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway in HCC Cells

The SOCS proteins act as endogenous inhibitors of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Frequent observations of hypermethylation or histone modification in the promoter regions of SOCS have been made in HCC [146,147]. These events result in the loss of normal SOCS function, contributing to the activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway and the subsequent development of HCC. The epigenetic suppression of SOCS in HCC can be countered by inhibiting DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) using Decitabine (5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine or 5-Aza-CdR) and inhibiting histone deacetylase (HDAC) using Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid or SAHA). Treatment with these agents elevates the expression levels of SOCS, leading to JAK/STAT pathway inhibition. Upon treatment with these agents, human HCC cells (HLE, LCL-PI 11) exhibited increased expression of SOCS1 and SOCS3, resulting in reduced activation of JAK2 and STAT3. Consequently, cell growth was hindered, and apoptosis was enhanced [148].
JAK1 was identified as a target of MicroRNA 30e (miR-30e). Transfection of HCC cells (HepG2 and Huh-7) with miR-30e led to decreases in phosphorylated levels of JAK1 and STAT3. Additionally, overexpression of miR-30e resulted in reduced cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, along with increased apoptosis in the HCC cells [149]. Pharmacological inhibition of JAK1 was also attempted using baricitinib, a small-molecule and selective inhibitor of JAK1 [150]. Treating HepG2 and Huh-7 cells with baricitinib downregulated phosphorylation of JAK1 and STAT3, resulting in reduced nuclear translocation of STAT3. Baricitinib administration led to decreased cell growth and increased apoptosis in the HCC cells [151].
Etomidate inhibits phosphorylation and activation of JAK2 by competing with ATP for binding to the ATP-binding pocket of JAK2. Application of etomidate to HCC cells (HepG2 and Huh-7) suppressed phosphorylation of JAK2 and STAT3, resulting in the inhibition of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, coupled with enhanced apoptosis [152]. Similarly, momelotinib, another small-molecule JAK2 inhibitor, suppressed phosphorylated JAK2 and STAT3 levels upon treatment of HCC cells (SNU-378 and SNU-475), subsequently leading to reduced cell viability, migration, and invasion [153].
Targeting STAT proteins also exerts similar anticancer effects in HCC cells. Pravastatin, a nonpeptide small molecule, effectively impedes STAT1 phosphorylation upon the activation by cytokine-induced pathways. Notably, pravastatin effectively dampened the phosphorylation of STAT1 induced by IFN-γ [154]. The proliferation of HepG2 and Huh-7 cells was significantly decreased following the treatment with pravastatin [155].
Napabucasin (BBI608) is a novel small-molecule inhibitor of STAT3. It has been shown to impair cancer stemness in various types of cancers, such as colorectal, pancreatic, and prostate cancers [156,157]. In a variety of HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hepa1-6, and HepG2, treatment with napabucasin led to decreases in cell viability and cell growth. Importantly, the treatment resulted in the downregulation of pSTAT3 and stemness markers such as Nanog, CD133, Klf4, Oct4, and Sox2 [158]. In another study, tumors induced by activated beta-catenin and mTOR signaling were highly susceptible to napabucasin, which strongly inhibited the proliferation of the tumor cells [159].

4.2. Preclinical Animal Studies Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway in HCC

Studies have demonstrated that miR-515-5p directly binds to the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of interleukin 6 (IL-6). Treatment of HCC cells (HepG2) with miR-515-5p suppressed the JAK/STAT signaling pathway along with reduced IL-6 expression. Overexpression of miR-515-5p inhibited migration and invasion of HepG2 cells that were transplanted into nude mice [160]. Similarly, in xenograft mice transplanted with HepG2 cells, treatment with etomidate, an inhibitor of JAK2, led to the inhibition of tumor growth and subsequent increases in animal survival (Table 3) [152].
SOCS3 is a suppressor of the JAK/STAT signaling. A long noncoding RNA known as C1QTNF1 antisense RNA 1 (C1QTNF1-AS1) maintains SOCS3 activity by binding with miR-221-3p, which downregulates SOCS3. In nude mice transplanted with HCC cells (HepG2 or Huh-7), ectopic expression of C1QTNF1-AS1 led to suppression of HCC tumor growths in vivo which was accompanied by a decrease in the expression of phosphorylated STAT3, as well as an increase in SOCS3 expression [161]. JAK2 and STAT3 are downstream signaling molecules of EphB4 receptor. In HCC cells, inhibition of EphB4 by the treatment with cantharidin led to suppression of JAK2 and STAT3 activities. In xenograft murine HCC models, treatment with cantharidin suppressed tumor growth in the mice [162]. Nitidine chloride is a small-molecule inhibitor that blocks the phosphorylation and activation of JAK1 and STAT3. When nitidine chloride was administered to nude mice transplanted with HepG2 cells, there was a decrease in the expression of phosphorylated JAK1 and STAT3 in the tumors, which resulted in an increase in apoptotic cells and a decrease in proliferating cells. These effects ultimately led to the inhibition of tumor growth and a reduction in tumor weight, thus confirming the anticancer efficacy of nitidine chloride [163].
Dehydrocrenatidine is a potent JAK family kinase inhibitor. HCC cells treated with dehydrocrenatidine exhibited a significant suppression in the phosphorylated level of JAK2. HepG2-xenograft mice treated with dehydrocrenatidine showed a significant reduction in tumor volume, leading to increases in animal survival. Of note, the treatment led to significantly reduced EMT and CSC phenotypes in HCC [164]. An azaspirane derivative, CIMO is an inhibitor of JAK/STAT signaling pathway by targeting JAK2 and JAK3. In HCC cell lines such as HepG2 and Hep3B, CIMO inhibited JAKs and STAT3 phosphorylation. In orthotopic murine xenograft models of HCC, treatment with CIMO at a dose of 10 mg per kg body weight led to a significant decrease in tumor growth [165].
Additionally, attempts to inhibit STAT3 have been made in HCC murine models. Mice transplanted with Hepa1-6 cells were intraperitoneally injected with napabucasin, a STAT3 inhibitor, at a dose of 20 mg per kilogram of body weight, or vehicle. Napabucasin treatment significantly reduced tumor volumes compared to the control group. Notably, approximately 25% of mice showed tumor regression when examined 21 days after administration [158]. OPB-31121 is another potent inhibitor of STAT3 phosphorylation that has demonstrated significant growth inhibition in various hematopoietic malignant cells [166]. Immunodeficient mice transplanted with Huh-7 or HepG2 cells were orally administered OPB-31121 at a daily dose of 60 mg per kg of body weight for 14 days. Treatment with OPB-31121 significantly inhibited HCC growth in the murine models [167].
In line with the results from xenograft models of HCC, chemically induced autochthonous HCC models also showed inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling suppressed HCC development. For example, rats harboring autochthonous HCC were treated with pravastatin, an inhibitor of STAT1 phosphorylation. The treatment led to significantly smaller tumor sizes in the livers. Immunohistochemistry studies revealed that the level of cellular proliferation in HCC from rats treated with pravastatin was significantly diminished compared to that from untreated mice [168].

5. Clinical Studies Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway in HCC

The significant role of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in HCC suggests that targeted inhibition of this pathway could hold therapeutic potential for treating patients with HCC [90]. Various types of JAK/STAT inhibitors are currently under investigation for their clinical relevance in HCC (Table 4). Itacitinib, an oral selective inhibitor of JAK1, has demonstrated no serious treatment-related adverse events [169,170]. A single-arm Phase Ib study is currently underway to evaluate the effect of itacitinib on 25 patients with advanced HCC (NCT04358185).
Considering the tumor-suppressive effects of pravastatin in preclinical animal models of HCC [168], the STAT1 inhibitor was assessed for its anticancer effects in clinical studies (NCT01418729, NCT01903694, and NCT01075555). In a Phase III clinical trial, patients with HCC received either sorafenib alone, a standard therapeutic agent for HCC, or sorafenib plus pravastatin. However, the combination of pravastatin with sorafenib failed to provide additional benefits to patients, as the mean overall survivals were not significantly different between the sorafenib alone and sorafenib plus pravastatin groups (10.7 months and 10.5 months, respectively) [171].
Danvatirsen (also known as AZD9150) is an antisense oligonucleotide that binds to STAT3 mRNA, thereby inhibiting the translation of STAT3 mRNA [172]. In patients with lymphoma and lung cancer, danvatirsen exhibited antitumor activity [173]. A Phase I trial assessed its safety and antitumor activity in patients with advanced or metastatic HCC (NCT01839604). Although the drug appeared relatively safe, it did not consistently show an antitumor effect [174].
In vitro and in vivo animal studies have demonstrated that napabucasin has a strong antitumor effect on HCC, as the STAT3 inhibitor suppresses cell viability and proliferation, as well as downregulating expression of stemness genes [158,159]. Based on promising preclinical results, a clinical trial evaluated the co-administration of sorafenib and napabucasin for potential benefits in advanced HCC patients over sorafenib treatment alone. However, a Phase I/II clinical trial revealed that co-administration of sorafenib and napabucasin achieved no improvement in overall response rates in HCC patients, compared to the treatment with sorafenib alone (NCT02279719).
Similarly, due to its effective suppression of tumor growth in murine HCC models [167], OPB-31121, a potent STAT3 inhibitor, was administered to 23 patients with progressive HCC at varying doses. To evaluate its antitumor efficacy, overall responses were assessed (NCT01406574). From the clinical trial, a marginal effect was observed in only six out of the twenty-three patients for a maximum of 8 weeks [167].
It is important to note that while inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway has shown promise in preclinical studies, its efficacy in patients with advanced HCC remains uncertain. Current clinical trials focused on this strategy are still in their early stages, and more studies are needed to better assess the effectiveness of targeting this signaling pathway. In summary, the ongoing clinical studies targeting the JAK/STAT pathway emphasize the complexity of this approach in HCC treatment and underscore the necessity for further investigation to identify more effective treatment strategies.

6. Perspectives and Conclusions

In the realm of clinical translation, it is noteworthy that while targeting the JAK/STAT pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) holds great promise, ongoing clinical trials focused on this strategy are still in their infancy. Despite the well-established significance of aberrant JAK/STAT signaling in HCC pathogenesis, along with preclinical observations of the anticancer effects of targeting the pathway in HCC, the journey toward clinical implementation requires a more systematic approach and refinement. Notably, adverse effects routinely observed in administering anticancer agents are particularly problematic in patients with HCC, given their pre-existing liver dysfunction due to sustained ailments from underlying chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis [1,2].
To explain the failure of therapeutic drugs that demonstrated antitumor effects in preclinical models of HCC to achieve effectiveness in clinical studies, several complex factors must be considered. In vitro and animal models of HCC do not perfectly mimic the human tumor microenvironment [175]. Factors such as immune response, blood supply, and interactions with neighboring tissues significantly influence HCC in humans [176]. Preclinical models might not accurately capture these aspects, leading to differences in drug response [177]. Additionally, human HCCs are genetically and molecularly diverse [178,179]. Genetic mutations, gene expression patterns, and signaling pathways can vary significantly among human patients. It is also noteworthy that animals and humans metabolize drugs differently due to varying pharmacokinetics between species. Thus, drugs that are effectively metabolized in animals to fully function as anticancer agents might not exhibit the desired effects on cancer in human due to imperfect metabolism of the drugs in the human body.
While current clinical studies targeting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway might not be yielding optimistic results, it is crucial to point out that these studies are still in the early stages. As researchers navigate the complexities of this pathway and its clinical translation, it is imperative that these efforts be met with the clinical successes they deserve. By shedding light on the underlying mechanisms driving JAK/STAT pathway activation and its contributions to HCC pathophysiology, we aim to pave the way for the development of novel JAK/STAT targeted therapies that hold promise in effectively combating this aggressive malignancy. Further, it is noteworthy that combining JAK/STAT targeted therapy with immunotherapy might hold promise, as both approaches involve targeting dysregulation of inflammatory and immune responses in the tumor microenvironment.
As an emerging therapeutic paradigm, the immune checkpoint has garnered attention as an attractive target for immunotherapy [180,181]. The rationale underpinning the immune checkpoint inhibition derives from the observation that the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in cancer cells allows them to evade immune surveillance via interaction with programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptors located on the surfaces of activated T cells, B cells, natural killer cells, and myeloid cells [182]. To maximize the effectiveness of immunotherapy in HCC, it is imperative to identify and develop new targets for immune modulators, thereby augmenting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). For instance, targeting Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) holds potential, given its significant role in orchestrating the immune response against HCC cells [183]. Similarly, activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome has demonstrated the ability to suppress HCC growth in murine xenograft models [184]. Hence, the combination of ICIs with TLR4 inhibitors or NLRP3 activators is poised to emerge as a promising immunotherapeutic approach for HCC. Furthermore, biomarkers are needed for predicting the response to immunotherapy and prognosis in HCC patients. In this context, Wu et al. recently reported the development of an immune-related gene prognostic index comprising nine immune-related genes [185].
Despite initial enthusiasm, targeting immune checkpoints in isolation has failed to demonstrate sustained therapeutic efficacy in HCC [180,182]. Consequently, therapeutic strategies have emerged that involve combining ICIs with other precisely targeted therapeutics [186,187]. In line with this concept, clinical trials have assessed the effectiveness of combinations involving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies with agents such as bevacizumab (targeting vascular endothelial growth factor-A), RTK inhibitors, or anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. This combinational therapeutic approach is currently regarded as the most efficacious modality for treating advanced HCC [186,188]. It is also intriguing to consider the potential effectiveness of combining JAK/STAT targeting with ICIs in patients with HCC.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from Kyung Hee University in 2023 (KHU- 20230902 awarded to S.W.R.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Llovet, J.M.; Kelley, R.K.; Villanueva, A.; Singal, A.G.; Pikarsky, E.; Roayaie, S.; Lencioni, R.; Koike, K.; Zucman-Rossi, J.; Finn, R.S. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2021, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Singal, A.G.; Lampertico, P.; Nahon, P. Epidemiology and surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma: New trends. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Villanueva, A. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1450–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Llovet, J.M.; Montal, R.; Sia, D.; Finn, R.S. Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 599–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moon, H.; Ro, S.W. MAPK/ERK Signaling Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers 2021, 13, 3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, A.; Yang, X.R.; Chung, W.Y.; Dennison, A.R.; Zhou, J. Targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gallage, S.; García-Beccaria, M.; Szydlowska, M.; Rahbari, M.; Mohr, R.; Tacke, F.; Heikenwalder, M. The therapeutic landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma. Med 2021, 2, 505–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, A.X.; Bernards, R.; Qin, W.; Wang, C. Evolving therapeutic landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 20, 203–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seki, E.; Schwabe, R.F. Hepatic inflammation and fibrosis: Functional links and key pathways. Hepatology 2015, 61, 1066–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Capece, D.; Fischietti, M.; Verzella, D.; Gaggiano, A.; Cicciarelli, G.; Tessitore, A.; Zazzeroni, F.; Alesse, E. The inflammatory microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: A pivotal role for tumor-associated macrophages. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 187204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moon, H.; Cho, K.; Shin, S.; Kim, D.Y.; Han, K.H.; Ro, S.W. High Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development in Fibrotic Liver: Role of the Hippo-YAP/TAZ Signaling Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rah, B.; Rather, R.A.; Bhat, G.R.; Baba, A.B.; Mushtaq, I.; Farooq, M.; Yousuf, T.; Dar, S.B.; Parveen, S.; Hassan, R.; et al. JAK/STAT Signaling: Molecular Targets, Therapeutic Opportunities, and Limitations of Targeted Inhibitions in Solid Malignancies. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 821344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hu, X.; Li, J.; Fu, M.; Zhao, X.; Wang, W. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: From bench to clinic. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bharadwaj, U.; Kasembeli, M.M.; Robinson, P.; Tweardy, D.J. Targeting Janus Kinases and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 to Treat Inflammation, Fibrosis, and Cancer: Rationale, Progress, and Caution. Pharmacol. Rev. 2020, 72, 486–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dodington, D.W.; Desai, H.R.; Woo, M. JAK/STAT - Emerging Players in Metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 29, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gu, Y.J.; Sun, W.Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, X.R.; Wei, W. Targeted blockade of JAK/STAT3 signaling inhibits proliferation, migration and collagen production as well as inducing the apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 38, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. O’Shea, J.J.; Plenge, R. JAK and STAT signaling molecules in immunoregulation and immune-mediated disease. Immunity 2012, 36, 542–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. O’Shea, J.J.; Holland, S.M.; Staudt, L.M. JAKs and STATs in immunity, immunodeficiency, and cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Akada, H.; Akada, S.; Hutchison, R.E.; Sakamoto, K.; Wagner, K.U.; Mohi, G. Critical role of Jak2 in the maintenance and function of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 1878–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fasouli, E.S.; Katsantoni, E. JAK-STAT in Early Hematopoiesis and Leukemia. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 669363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Staerk, J.; Constantinescu, S.N. The JAK-STAT pathway and hematopoietic stem cells from the JAK2 V617F perspective. Jakstat 2012, 1, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hin Tang, J.J.; Hao Thng, D.K.; Lim, J.J.; Toh, T.B. JAK/STAT signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepat. Oncol. 2020, 7, Hep18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Svinka, J.; Mikulits, W.; Eferl, R. STAT3 in hepatocellular carcinoma: New perspectives. Hepat. Oncol. 2014, 1, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, Q.; Bian, Q.; Rong, D.; Wang, L.; Song, J.; Huang, H.S.; Zeng, J.; Mei, J.; Wang, P.Y. JAK/STAT pathway: Extracellular signals, diseases, immunity, and therapeutic regimens. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1110765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jin, W. Role of JAK/STAT3 Signaling in the Regulation of Metastasis, the Transition of Cancer Stem Cells, and Chemoresistance of Cancer by Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Cells 2020, 9, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, Q.; Ren, Q.; Jiao, L.; Huang, J.; Yi, J.; Chen, J.; Lai, J.; Ji, G.; Zheng, T. The potential roles of JAK/STAT signaling in the progression of osteoarthritis. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 1069057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schindler, C.; Levy, D.E.; Decker, T. JAK-STAT signaling: From interferons to cytokines. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 20059–20063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Seif, F.; Khoshmirsafa, M.; Aazami, H.; Mohsenzadegan, M.; Sedighi, G.; Bahar, M. The role of JAK-STAT signaling pathway and its regulators in the fate of T helper cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2017, 15, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ferrao, R.; Lupardus, P.J. The Janus Kinase (JAK) FERM and SH2 Domains: Bringing Specificity to JAK-Receptor Interactions. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jatiani, S.S.; Baker, S.J.; Silverman, L.R.; Reddy, E.P. Jak/STAT pathways in cytokine signaling and myeloproliferative disorders: Approaches for targeted therapies. Genes Cancer 2010, 1, 979–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kisseleva, T.; Bhattacharya, S.; Braunstein, J.; Schindler, C.W. Signaling through the JAK/STAT pathway, recent advances and future challenges. Gene 2002, 285, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xin, P.; Xu, X.; Deng, C.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Ma, H.; Wei, D.; Sun, S. The role of JAK/STAT signaling pathway and its inhibitors in diseases. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 80, 106210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Awasthi, N.; Liongue, C.; Ward, A.C. STAT proteins: A kaleidoscope of canonical and non-canonical functions in immunity and cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 14, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, J.; Xie, W.; Chen, C.; Wang, Z.; Yang, H.; Cui, J. Zika virus evades interferon-mediated antiviral response through the co-operation of multiple nonstructural proteins in vitro. Cell Discov. 2017, 3, 17006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kiu, H.; Nicholson, S.E. Biology and significance of the JAK/STAT signalling pathways. Growth Factors 2012, 30, 88–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Morris, R.; Kershaw, N.J.; Babon, J.J. The molecular details of cytokine signaling via the JAK/STAT pathway. Protein Sci. 2018, 27, 1984–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Verhoeven, Y.; Tilborghs, S.; Jacobs, J.; De Waele, J.; Quatannens, D.; Deben, C.; Prenen, H.; Pauwels, P.; Trinh, X.B.; Wouters, A.; et al. The potential and controversy of targeting STAT family members in cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2020, 60, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, J.M.; An, J. Cytokines, inflammation, and pain. Int. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2007, 45, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Berraondo, P.; Sanmamed, M.F.; Ochoa, M.C.; Etxeberria, I.; Aznar, M.A.; Pérez-Gracia, J.L.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.E.; Ponz-Sarvise, M.; Castañón, E.; Melero, I. Cytokines in clinical cancer immunotherapy. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 120, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kupsa, T.; Horacek, J.M.; Jebavy, L. The role of cytokines in acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review. Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky Olomouc Czech. Repub. 2012, 156, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Luo, Y.; Alexander, M.; Gadina, M.; O’Shea, J.J.; Meylan, F.; Schwartz, D.M. JAK-STAT signaling in human disease: From genetic syndromes to clinical inhibition. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 148, 911–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mitra, S.; Leonard, W.J. Biology of IL-2 and its therapeutic modulation: Mechanisms and strategies. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2018, 103, 643–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liao, W.; Lin, J.X.; Leonard, W.J. IL-2 family cytokines: New insights into the complex roles of IL-2 as a broad regulator of T helper cell differentiation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2011, 23, 598–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jones, D.M.; Read, K.A.; Oestreich, K.J. Dynamic Roles for IL-2-STAT5 Signaling in Effector and Regulatory CD4(+) T Cell Populations. J. Immunol. 2020, 205, 1721–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fu, C.; Jiang, L.; Hao, S.; Liu, Z.; Ding, S.; Zhang, W.; Yang, X.; Li, S. Activation of the IL-4/STAT6 Signaling Pathway Promotes Lung Cancer Progression by Increasing M2 Myeloid Cells. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Unver, N.; McAllister, F. IL-6 family cytokines: Key inflammatory mediators as biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2018, 41, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rose-John, S. Interleukin-6 Family Cytokines. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, a028415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Johnson, D.E.; O’Keefe, R.A.; Grandis, J.R. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 234–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lokau, J.; Schoeder, V.; Haybaeck, J.; Garbers, C. Jak-Stat Signaling Induced by Interleukin-6 Family Cytokines in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers 2019, 11, 1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jones, S.A.; Scheller, J.; Rose-John, S. Therapeutic strategies for the clinical blockade of IL-6/gp130 signaling. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 3375–3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Xu, J.; Lin, H.; Wu, G.; Zhu, M.; Li, M. IL-6/STAT3 Is a Promising Therapeutic Target for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 760971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kourko, O.; Seaver, K.; Odoardi, N.; Basta, S.; Gee, K. IL-27, IL-30, and IL-35: A Cytokine Triumvirate in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jones, G.W.; Hill, D.G.; Cardus, A.; Jones, S.A. IL-27: A double agent in the IL-6 family. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2018, 193, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. O’Shea, J.J.; Schwartz, D.M.; Villarino, A.V.; Gadina, M.; McInnes, I.B.; Laurence, A. The JAK-STAT pathway: Impact on human disease and therapeutic intervention. Annu. Rev. Med. 2015, 66, 311–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Banerjee, S.; Biehl, A.; Gadina, M.; Hasni, S.; Schwartz, D.M. JAK-STAT Signaling as a Target for Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases: Current and Future Prospects. Drugs 2017, 77, 521–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Aittomäki, S.; Pesu, M. Therapeutic targeting of the Jak/STAT pathway. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2014, 114, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aaronson, D.S.; Horvath, C.M. A road map for those who don’t know JAK-STAT. Science 2002, 296, 1653–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, X.; Xin, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, F.; Gao, M.; Yuan, L.; Xu, X.; Hu, X.; Zhao, M. Aberrant expression of p-STAT3 in peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ T cells related to hepatocellular carcinoma development. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 10, 2649–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, C.J.; Xiao, C.W.; You, T.G.; Zheng, Y.X.; Gao, W.; Zhou, Z.Q.; Chen, J.; Xue, X.B.; Fan, J.; Zhang, H. Interferon-α enhances antitumor activities of oncolytic adenovirus-mediated IL-24 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 2012, 11, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Andoh, A.; Shioya, M.; Nishida, A.; Bamba, S.; Tsujikawa, T.; Kim-Mitsuyama, S.; Fujiyama, Y. Expression of IL-24, an activator of the JAK1/STAT3/SOCS3 cascade, is enhanced in inflammatory bowel disease. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gu, F.M.; Li, Q.L.; Gao, Q.; Jiang, J.H.; Zhu, K.; Huang, X.Y.; Pan, J.F.; Yan, J.; Hu, J.H.; Wang, Z.; et al. IL-17 induces AKT-dependent IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 activation and tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 2011, 10, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, J.; Zeng, M.; Yan, K.; Yang, Y.; Li, H.; Xu, X. IL-17 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma through inhibiting apoptosis induced by IFN-γ. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 522, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. O’Sullivan, L.A.; Liongue, C.; Lewis, R.S.; Stephenson, S.E.; Ward, A.C. Cytokine receptor signaling through the Jak-Stat-Socs pathway in disease. Mol. Immunol. 2007, 44, 2497–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bedke, T.; Muscate, F.; Soukou, S.; Gagliani, N.; Huber, S. Title: IL-10-producing T cells and their dual functions. Semin. Immunol. 2019, 44, 101335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wilbers, R.H.P.; van Raaij, D.R.; Westerhof, L.B.; Bakker, J.; Smant, G.; Schots, A. Re-evaluation of IL-10 signaling reveals novel insights on the contribution of the intracellular domain of the IL-10R2 chain. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hutchins, A.P.; Diez, D.; Miranda-Saavedra, D. The IL-10/STAT3-mediated anti-inflammatory response: Recent developments and future challenges. Brief Funct. Genom. 2013, 12, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Xu-Monette, Z.Y.; Miao, Y.; Xiao, M.; Young, K.H.; Wang, S.; Medeiros, L.J.; Wang, M.; et al. B-cell receptor-mediated NFATc1 activation induces IL-10/STAT3/PD-L1 signaling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2018, 132, 1805–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. von Essen, M.R.; Søndergaard, H.B.; Petersen, E.R.S.; Sellebjerg, F. IL-6, IL-12, and IL-23 STAT-Pathway Genetic Risk and Responsiveness of Lymphocytes in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Cells 2019, 8, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Floss, D.M.; Moll, J.M.; Scheller, J. IL-12 and IL-23-Close Relatives with Structural Homologies but Distinct Immunological Functions. Cells 2020, 9, 2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dougan, M.; Dranoff, G.; Dougan, S.K. GM-CSF, IL-3, and IL-5 Family of Cytokines: Regulators of Inflammation. Immunity 2019, 50, 796–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hercus, T.R.; Kan, W.L.T.; Broughton, S.E.; Tvorogov, D.; Ramshaw, H.S.; Sandow, J.J.; Nero, T.L.; Dhagat, U.; Thompson, E.J.; Shing, K.; et al. Role of the β Common (βc) Family of Cytokines in Health and Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, a028514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Thorn, M.; Guha, P.; Cunetta, M.; Espat, N.J.; Miller, G.; Junghans, R.P.; Katz, S.C. Tumor-associated GM-CSF overexpression induces immunoinhibitory molecules via STAT3 in myeloid-suppressor cells infiltrating liver metastases. Cancer Gene Ther. 2016, 23, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhang, C.; Liu, J.; Yuan, C.; Ji, Q.; Chen, D.; Zhao, H.; Jiang, W.; Ma, K.; Liu, L. JAK2/STAT3 is associated with the inflammatory process in periapical granuloma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2019, 12, 190–197. [Google Scholar]
  75. Reusswig, F.; Fazel Modares, N.; Brechtenkamp, M.; Wienands, L.; Krüger, I.; Behnke, K.; Lee-Sundlov, M.M.; Herebian, D.; Scheller, J.; Hoffmeister, K.M.; et al. Efficiently Restored Thrombopoietin Production by Ashwell-Morell Receptor and IL-6R Induced Janus Kinase 2/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription Signaling Early After Partial Hepatectomy. Hepatology 2021, 74, 411–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Mu, W.; Ao, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Duan, C. Exploring the protective mechanisms of total tannins from Geum japonicum var. chinense F.Bolle in mice with hematopoietic dysfunction via the JAK2/STAT3/5 signaling pathway. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 296, 115507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. He, K.; Liu, X.; Hoffman, R.D.; Shi, R.Z.; Lv, G.Y.; Gao, J.L. G-CSF/GM-CSF-induced hematopoietic dysregulation in the progression of solid tumors. FEBS Open Bio 2022, 12, 1268–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Karagiannidis, I.; Salataj, E.; Said Abu Egal, E.; Beswick, E.J. G-CSF in tumors: Aggressiveness, tumor microenvironment and immune cell regulation. Cytokine 2021, 142, 155479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tóthová, Z.; Tomc, J.; Debeljak, N.; Solár, P. STAT5 as a Key Protein of Erythropoietin Signalization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gao, B.; Wang, H.; Lafdil, F.; Feng, D. STAT proteins—Key regulators of anti-viral responses, inflammation, and tumorigenesis in the liver. J. Hepatol. 2012, 57, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jorgovanovic, D.; Song, M.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y. Roles of IFN-γ in tumor progression and regression: A review. Biomark Res. 2020, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Bousoik, E.; Montazeri Aliabadi, H. "Do We Know Jack" About JAK? A Closer Look at JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Broughton, S.E.; Dhagat, U.; Hercus, T.R.; Nero, T.L.; Grimbaldeston, M.A.; Bonder, C.S.; Lopez, A.F.; Parker, M.W. The GM-CSF/IL-3/IL-5 cytokine receptor family: From ligand recognition to initiation of signaling. Immunol. Rev. 2012, 250, 277–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Durham, G.A.; Williams, J.J.L.; Nasim, M.T.; Palmer, T.M. Targeting SOCS Proteins to Control JAK-STAT Signalling in Disease. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 40, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Tamiya, T.; Kashiwagi, I.; Takahashi, R.; Yasukawa, H.; Yoshimura, A. Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins and JAK/STAT pathways: Regulation of T-cell inflammation by SOCS1 and SOCS3. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 980–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ungureanu, D.; Vanhatupa, S.; Grönholm, J.; Palvimo, J.J.; Silvennoinen, O. SUMO-1 conjugation selectively modulates STAT1-mediated gene responses. Blood 2005, 106, 224–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Xu, D.; Qu, C.K. Protein tyrosine phosphatases in the JAK/STAT pathway. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13, 4925–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Calvisi, D.F.; Ladu, S.; Gorden, A.; Farina, M.; Conner, E.A.; Lee, J.S.; Factor, V.M.; Thorgeirsson, S.S. Ubiquitous activation of Ras and Jak/Stat pathways in human HCC. Gastroenterology 2006, 130, 1117–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dawson, M.A.; Bannister, A.J.; Göttgens, B.; Foster, S.D.; Bartke, T.; Green, A.R.; Kouzarides, T. JAK2 phosphorylates histone H3Y41 and excludes HP1alpha from chromatin. Nature 2009, 461, 819–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Thomas, S.J.; Snowden, J.A.; Zeidler, M.P.; Danson, S.J. The role of JAK/STAT signalling in the pathogenesis, prognosis and treatment of solid tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 113, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, X.; Liao, X.; Yu, T.; Gong, Y.; Zhang, L.; Huang, J.; Yang, C.; Han, C.; Yu, L.; Zhu, G.; et al. Analysis of clinical significance and prospective molecular mechanism of main elements of the JAK/STAT pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 55, 805–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kusaba, M.; Nakao, K.; Goto, T.; Nishimura, D.; Kawashimo, H.; Shibata, H.; Motoyoshi, Y.; Taura, N.; Ichikawa, T.; Hamasaki, K.; et al. Abrogation of constitutive STAT3 activity sensitizes human hepatoma cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. J. Hepatol. 2007, 47, 546–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Alas, S.; Bonavida, B. Rituximab inactivates signal transducer and activation of transcription 3 (STAT3) activity in B-non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma through inhibition of the interleukin 10 autocrine/paracrine loop and results in down-regulation of Bcl-2 and sensitization to cytotoxic drugs. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 5137–5144. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Carbajo-Pescador, S.; Ordoñez, R.; Benet, M.; Jover, R.; García-Palomo, A.; Mauriz, J.L.; González-Gallego, J. Inhibition of VEGF expression through blockade of Hif1α and STAT3 signalling mediates the anti-angiogenic effect of melatonin in HepG2 liver cancer cells. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 109, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Won, C.; Kim, B.H.; Yi, E.H.; Choi, K.J.; Kim, E.K.; Jeong, J.M.; Lee, J.H.; Jang, J.J.; Yoon, J.H.; Jeong, W.I.; et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3-mediated CD133 up-regulation contributes to promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2015, 62, 1160–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lee, T.K.; Castilho, A.; Cheung, V.C.; Tang, K.H.; Ma, S.; Ng, I.O. CD24(+) liver tumor-initiating cells drive self-renewal and tumor initiation through STAT3-mediated NANOG regulation. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 9, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sun, X.; Sui, Q.; Zhang, C.; Tian, Z.; Zhang, J. Targeting blockage of STAT3 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells augments NK cell functions via reverse hepatocellular carcinoma-induced immune suppression. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013, 12, 2885–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, C.H.; Guo, F.L.; Xu, G.L.; Jia, W.D.; Ge, Y.S. STAT3 activation mediates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatogastroenterology 2014, 61, 1082–1089. [Google Scholar]
  99. Huang, L.; Jian, Z.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, G.; Jiang, B.; Lv, Y. RPN2 promotes metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cell and inhibits autophagy via STAT3 and NF-κB pathways. Aging 2019, 11, 6674–6690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lee, T.K.; Man, K.; Poon, R.T.; Lo, C.M.; Yuen, A.P.; Ng, I.O.; Ng, K.T.; Leonard, W.; Fan, S.T. Signal transducers and activators of transcription 5b activation enhances hepatocellular carcinoma aggressiveness through induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 9948–9956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kan, Z.; Zheng, H.; Liu, X.; Li, S.; Barber, T.D.; Gong, Z.; Gao, H.; Hao, K.; Willard, M.D.; Xu, J.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma. Genome Res. 2013, 23, 1422–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Rebouissou, S.; Amessou, M.; Couchy, G.; Poussin, K.; Imbeaud, S.; Pilati, C.; Izard, T.; Balabaud, C.; Bioulac-Sage, P.; Zucman-Rossi, J. Frequent in-frame somatic deletions activate gp130 in inflammatory hepatocellular tumours. Nature 2009, 457, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Xie, H.J.; Bae, H.J.; Noh, J.H.; Eun, J.W.; Kim, J.K.; Jung, K.H.; Ryu, J.C.; Ahn, Y.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, S.H.; et al. Mutational analysis of JAK1 gene in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Neoplasma 2009, 56, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yang, S.; Luo, C.; Gu, Q.; Xu, Q.; Wang, G.; Sun, H.; Qian, Z.; Tan, Y.; Qin, Y.; Shen, Y.; et al. Activating JAK1 mutation may predict the sensitivity of JAK-STAT inhibition in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 5461–5469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Pilati, C.; Zucman-Rossi, J. Mutations leading to constitutive active gp130/JAK1/STAT3 pathway. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2015, 26, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Pilati, C.; Amessou, M.; Bihl, M.P.; Balabaud, C.; Nhieu, J.T.; Paradis, V.; Nault, J.C.; Izard, T.; Bioulac-Sage, P.; Couchy, G.; et al. Somatic mutations activating STAT3 in human inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 1359–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. He, G.; Karin, M. NF-κB and STAT3 - key players in liver inflammation and cancer. Cell Res. 2011, 21, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yoshikawa, H.; Matsubara, K.; Qian, G.S.; Jackson, P.; Groopman, J.D.; Manning, J.E.; Harris, C.C.; Herman, J.G. SOCS-1, a negative regulator of the JAK/STAT pathway, is silenced by methylation in human hepatocellular carcinoma and shows growth-suppression activity. Nat. Genet. 2001, 28, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Cheng, J.; Ding, S.; Li, M.; Sun, S.; Zhang, L.; Liu, S.; Chen, X.; Zhuang, H.; et al. An integrated analysis of SOCS1 down-regulation in HBV infection-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Viral Hepat. 2014, 21, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Calvisi, D.F.; Ladu, S.; Gorden, A.; Farina, M.; Lee, J.S.; Conner, E.A.; Schroeder, I.; Factor, V.M.; Thorgeirsson, S.S. Mechanistic and prognostic significance of aberrant methylation in the molecular pathogenesis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 2713–2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Calvisi, D.F. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A paradoxical oncogenic and tumor suppressive role of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in liver cancer. Hepatology 2011, 54, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Chung, S.I.; Moon, H.; Ju, H.L.; Cho, K.J.; Kim, D.Y.; Han, K.H.; Eun, J.W.; Nam, S.W.; Ribback, S.; Dombrowski, F.; et al. Hepatic expression of Sonic Hedgehog induces liver fibrosis and promotes hepatocarcinogenesis in a transgenic mouse model. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, 618–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Refolo, M.G.; Messa, C.; Guerra, V.; Carr, B.I.; D’Alessandro, R. Inflammatory Mechanisms of HCC Development. Cancers 2020, 12, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Yan, Z.; Yang, H.; Sun, W.; Yao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, R. IL-6 promotes PD-L1 expression in monocytes and macrophages by decreasing protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Immunother. Cancer 2020, 8, e000285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lin, Y.; He, Z.; Ye, J.; Liu, Z.; She, X.; Gao, X.; Liang, R. Progress in Understanding the IL-6/STAT3 Pathway in Colorectal Cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2020, 13, 13023–13032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Manore, S.G.; Doheny, D.L.; Wong, G.L.; Lo, H.W. IL-6/JAK/STAT3 Signaling in Breast Cancer Metastasis: Biology and Treatment. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 866014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Xiong, S.; Wang, R.; Chen, Q.; Luo, J.; Wang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Cheng, B. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote stem cell-like properties of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through IL-6/STAT3/Notch signaling. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018, 8, 302–316. [Google Scholar]
  118. Schmidt-Arras, D.; Rose-John, S. IL-6 pathway in the liver: From physiopathology to therapy. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, 1403–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Aleksandrova, K.; Boeing, H.; Nöthlings, U.; Jenab, M.; Fedirko, V.; Kaaks, R.; Lukanova, A.; Trichopoulou, A.; Trichopoulos, D.; Boffetta, P.; et al. Inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers and risk of liver and biliary tract cancer. Hepatology 2014, 60, 858–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Soresi, M.; Giannitrapani, L.; D’Antona, F.; Florena, A.M.; La Spada, E.; Terranova, A.; Cervello, M.; D’Alessandro, N.; Montalto, G. Interleukin-6 and its soluble receptor in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 12, 2563–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yu, S.; Chen, J.; Quan, M.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y. CD63 negatively regulates hepatocellular carcinoma development through suppression of inflammatory cytokine-induced STAT3 activation. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 1024–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Zhang, J.F.; He, M.L.; Fu, W.M.; Wang, H.; Chen, L.Z.; Zhu, X.; Chen, Y.; Xie, D.; Lai, P.; Chen, G.; et al. Primate-specific microRNA-637 inhibits tumorigenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma by disrupting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling. Hepatology 2011, 54, 2137–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Aroucha, D.C.; do Carmo, R.F.; Moura, P.; Silva, J.L.; Vasconcelos, L.R.; Cavalcanti, M.S.; Muniz, M.T.; Aroucha, M.L.; Siqueira, E.R.; Cahú, G.G.; et al. High tumor necrosis factor-α/interleukin-10 ratio is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Cytokine 2013, 62, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Swiątek, B.J. Is interleukin-10 gene polymorphism a predictive marker in HCV infection? Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2012, 23, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zhang, S.; Gan, X.; Qiu, J.; Ju, Z.; Gao, J.; Zhou, J.; Shi, C.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Z. IL-10 derived from Hepatocarcinoma cells improves human induced regulatory T cells function via JAK1/STAT5 pathway in tumor microenvironment. Mol. Immunol. 2021, 133, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Buchert, M.; Burns, C.J.; Ernst, M. Targeting JAK kinase in solid tumors: Emerging opportunities and challenges. Oncogene 2016, 35, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Cui, C.; Fu, K.; Yang, L.; Wu, S.; Cen, Z.; Meng, X.; Huang, Q.; Xie, Z. Hypoxia-inducible gene 2 promotes the immune escape of hepatocellular carcinoma from nature killer cells through the interleukin-10-STAT3 signaling pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sui, Q.; Zhang, J.; Sun, X.; Zhang, C.; Han, Q.; Tian, Z. NK cells are the crucial antitumor mediators when STAT3-mediated immunosuppression is blocked in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 2016–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Langer, J.A.; Cutrone, E.C.; Kotenko, S. The Class II cytokine receptor (CRF2) family: Overview and patterns of receptor-ligand interactions. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2004, 15, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sabat, R. IL-10 family of cytokines. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010, 21, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hsu, Y.H.; Li, H.H.; Sung, J.M.; Chen, W.T.; Hou, Y.C.; Chang, M.S. Interleukin-19 mediates tissue damage in murine ischemic acute kidney injury. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Caparrós, E.; Francés, R. The Interleukin-20 Cytokine Family in Liver Disease. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Hsing, C.H.; Cheng, H.C.; Hsu, Y.H.; Chan, C.H.; Yeh, C.H.; Li, C.F.; Chang, M.S. Upregulated IL-19 in breast cancer promotes tumor progression and affects clinical outcome. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Fujimoto, Y.; Kuramoto, N.; Yoneyama, M.; Azuma, Y.T. Interleukin-19 as an Immunoregulatory Cytokine. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2021, 14, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wang, H.H.; Hsu, Y.H.; Chang, M.S. IL-20 bone diseases involvement and therapeutic target potential. J. Biomed. Sci. 2018, 25, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wegenka, U.M.; Dikopoulos, N.; Reimann, J.; Adler, G.; Wahl, C. The murine liver is a potential target organ for IL-19, IL-20 and IL-24: Type I Interferons and LPS regulate the expression of IL-20R2. J. Hepatol. 2007, 46, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Chiu, Y.S.; Wei, C.C.; Lin, Y.J.; Hsu, Y.H.; Chang, M.S. IL-20 and IL-20R1 antibodies protect against liver fibrosis. Hepatology 2014, 60, 1003–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Yang, H.; Xuefeng, Y.; Jianhua, X. Systematic review of the roles of interleukins in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Chim. Acta 2020, 506, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ding, W.Z.; Han, G.Y.; Jin, H.H.; Zhan, C.F.; Ji, Y.; Huang, X.L. Anti-IL-20 monoclonal antibody suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 6156–6162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Langowski, J.L.; Zhang, X.; Wu, L.; Mattson, J.D.; Chen, T.; Smith, K.; Basham, B.; McClanahan, T.; Kastelein, R.A.; Oft, M. IL-23 promotes tumour incidence and growth. Nature 2006, 442, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Silvagni, E.; Missiroli, S.; Perrone, M.; Patergnani, S.; Boncompagni, C.; Bortoluzzi, A.; Govoni, M.; Giorgi, C.; Alivernini, S.; Pinton, P.; et al. From Bed to Bench and Back: TNF-α, IL-23/IL-17A, and JAK-Dependent Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Psoriatic Synovitis. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 672515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kang, Y.; Su, G.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y. Activation of the TLR4/MyD88 signaling pathway contributes to the development of human hepatocellular carcinoma via upregulation of IL-23 and IL-17A. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 9647–9654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Wang, J.; Lu, L.; Luo, Z.; Li, W.; Lu, Y.; Tang, Q.; Pu, J. miR-383 inhibits cell growth and promotes cell apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting IL-17 via STAT3 signaling pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 120, 109551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Wu, J.; Guo, J.; Cao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, Z. Autophagy impacts on oxaliplatin-induced hepatocarcinoma apoptosis via the IL-17/IL-17R-JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 13, 770–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Kuang, D.M.; Zhao, Q.; Wu, Y.; Peng, C.; Wang, J.; Xu, Z.; Yin, X.Y.; Zheng, L. Peritumoral neutrophils link inflammatory response to disease progression by fostering angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2011, 54, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. He, B.; You, L.; Uematsu, K.; Zang, K.; Xu, Z.; Lee, A.Y.; Costello, J.F.; McCormick, F.; Jablons, D.M. SOCS-3 is frequently silenced by hypermethylation and suppresses cell growth in human lung cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 14133–14138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Khan, F.S.; Ali, I.; Afridi, U.K.; Ishtiaq, M.; Mehmood, R. Epigenetic mechanisms regulating the development of hepatocellular carcinoma and their promise for therapeutics. Hepatol. Int. 2017, 11, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sanaei, M.; Kavoosi, F.; Pourahmadi, M. Effect of Decitabine (5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, 5-aza-CdR) in Comparison with Vorinostat (Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid, SAHA) on DNMT1, DNMT3a and DNMT3b, HDAC 1-3, SOCS 1, SOCS 3, JAK2, and STAT3 Gene Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma HLE and LCL-PI 11 Cell Lines. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2021, 22, 2089–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mao, J.; Hu, X.; Pang, P.; Zhou, B.; Li, D.; Shan, H. miR-30e acts as a tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinoma partly via JAK1/STAT3 pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Norman, P. Selective JAK inhibitors in development for rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2014, 23, 1067–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Yang, L.; Xue, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xue, F.; Ge, R. CircularRNA-9119 protects hepatocellular carcinoma cells from apoptosis by intercepting miR-26a/JAK1/STAT3 signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Xu, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, N.; Dai, J.; Zhang, R.; Yao, F.; Zhou, S.; Wu, Z.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, L.; et al. Etomidate elicits anti-tumor capacity by disrupting the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2023, 552, 215970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Cherng, Y.G.; Chu, Y.C.; Yadav, V.K.; Huang, T.Y.; Hsieh, M.S.; Lee, K.F.; Lee, W.H.; Yeh, C.T.; Ong, J.R. Induced Mitochondrial Alteration and DNA Damage via IFNGR-JAK2-STAT1-PARP1 Pathway Facilitates Viral Hepatitis Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Aggressiveness and Stemness. Cancers 2021, 13, 2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Zhou, X.X.; Gao, P.J.; Sun, B.G. Pravastatin attenuates interferon-gamma action via modulation of STAT1 to prevent aortic atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2009, 36, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sutter, A.P.; Maaser, K.; Höpfner, M.; Huether, A.; Schuppan, D.; Scherübl, H. Cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Synergistic antiproliferative action with ligands of the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor. J. Hepatol. 2005, 43, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Han, D.; Yu, T.; Dong, N.; Wang, B.; Sun, F.; Jiang, D. Napabucasin, a novel STAT3 inhibitor suppresses proliferation, invasion and stemness of glioblastoma cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Li, Y.; Rogoff, H.A.; Keates, S.; Gao, Y.; Murikipudi, S.; Mikule, K.; Leggett, D.; Li, W.; Pardee, A.B.; Li, C.J. Suppression of cancer relapse and metastasis by inhibiting cancer stemness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 1839–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Li, Y.; Han, Q.; Zhao, H.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, J. Napabucasin Reduces Cancer Stem Cell Characteristics in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 597520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Shen, Y.; Zheng, X.; Qian, Y.; Liu, M.; Nian, Z.; Cui, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Fu, B.; Sun, R.; Tian, Z.; et al. Interactions between driver genes shape the signaling pathway landscape and direct hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Cancer Sci. 2023, 114, 2386–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ni, J.S.; Zheng, H.; Ou, Y.L.; Tao, Y.P.; Wang, Z.G.; Song, L.H.; Yan, H.L.; Zhou, W.P. miR-515-5p suppresses HCC migration and invasion via targeting IL6/JAK/STAT3 pathway. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 34, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Li, H.; Zhang, B.; Ding, M.; Lu, S.; Zhou, H.; Sun, D.; Wu, G.; Gan, X. C1QTNF1-AS1 regulates the occurrence and development of hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating miR-221-3p/SOCS3. Hepatol. Int. 2019, 13, 277–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Zhu, M.; Shi, X.; Gong, Z.; Su, Q.; Yu, R.; Wang, B.; Yang, T.; Dai, B.; Zhan, Y.; Zhang, D.; et al. Cantharidin treatment inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma development by regulating the JAK2/STAT3 and PI3K/Akt pathways in an EphB4-dependent manner. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 158, 104868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Liao, J.; Xu, T.; Zheng, J.X.; Lin, J.M.; Cai, Q.Y.; Yu, D.B.; Peng, J. Nitidine chloride inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell growth in vivo through the suppression of the JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2013, 32, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Li, C.L.; Wang, C.C.; Pai, H.T.; Tu, S.L.; Hou, P.Y.; Huang, C.Y.; Huang, M.T.; Chang, Y.J. The Natural Compound Dehydrocrenatidine Attenuates Nicotine-Induced Stemness and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Regulating a7nAChR-Jak2 Signaling Pathways. Dis. Markers 2022, 2022, 8316335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Mohan, C.D.; Bharathkumar, H.; Bulusu, K.C.; Pandey, V.; Rangappa, S.; Fuchs, J.E.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Dai, X.; Li, F.; Deivasigamani, A.; et al. Development of a novel azaspirane that targets the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 34296–34307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Hayakawa, F.; Sugimoto, K.; Harada, Y.; Hashimoto, N.; Ohi, N.; Kurahashi, S.; Naoe, T. A novel STAT inhibitor, OPB-31121, has a significant antitumor effect on leukemia with STAT-addictive oncokinases. Blood Cancer J. 2013, 3, e166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Okusaka, T.; Ueno, H.; Ikeda, M.; Mitsunaga, S.; Ozaka, M.; Ishii, H.; Yokosuka, O.; Ooka, Y.; Yoshimoto, R.; Yanagihara, Y.; et al. Phase 1 and pharmacological trial of OPB-31121, a signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 inhibitor, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol. Res. 2015, 45, 1283–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Hijona, E.; Banales, J.M.; Hijona, L.; Medina, J.F.; Arenas, J.; Herreros-Villanueva, M.; Aldazabal, P.; Bujanda, L. Pravastatin inhibits cell proliferation and increased MAT1A expression in hepatocarcinoma cells and in vivo models. Cancer Cell Int. 2012, 12, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Covington, M.; He, X.; Scuron, M.; Li, J.; Collins, R.; Juvekar, A.; Shin, N.; Favata, M.; Gallagher, K.; Sarah, S.; et al. Preclinical characterization of itacitinib (INCB039110), a novel selective inhibitor of JAK1, for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 885, 173505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Barbour, A.M.; Rockich, K.; Cimino, E.; Zhou, G.; Leonetti-Whalen, C.; Chen, X.; Yeleswaram, S.; Epstein, N.; Punwani, N. Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Itacitinib. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 61, 954–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Jouve, J.L.; Lecomte, T.; Bouché, O.; Barbier, E.; Khemissa Akouz, F.; Riachi, G.; Nguyen Khac, E.; Ollivier-Hourmand, I.; Debette-Gratien, M.; Faroux, R.; et al. Pravastatin combination with sorafenib does not improve survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Burel, S.A.; Han, S.R.; Lee, H.S.; Norris, D.A.; Lee, B.S.; Machemer, T.; Park, S.Y.; Zhou, T.; He, G.; Kim, Y.; et al. Preclinical evaluation of the toxicological effects of a novel constrained ethyl modified antisense compound targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in mice and cynomolgus monkeys. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2013, 23, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Hong, D.; Kurzrock, R.; Kim, Y.; Woessner, R.; Younes, A.; Nemunaitis, J.; Fowler, N.; Zhou, T.; Schmidt, J.; Jo, M.; et al. AZD9150, a next-generation antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of STAT3 with early evidence of clinical activity in lymphoma and lung cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 314ra185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Lee, C.; Cheung, S.T. STAT3: An Emerging Therapeutic Target for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers 2019, 11, 1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Yim, S.Y.; Lee, J.S. Genomic Perspective on Mouse Liver Cancer Models. Cancers 2019, 11, 1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Brown, Z.J.; Heinrich, B.; Greten, T.F. Mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma: An overview and highlights for immunotherapy research. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 15, 536–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Macek Jilkova, Z.; Kurma, K.; Decaens, T. Animal Models of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Role of Immune System and Tumor Microenvironment. Cancers 2019, 11, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Llovet, J.M.; Bruix, J. Molecular targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2008, 48, 1312–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Dimri, M.; Satyanarayana, A. Molecular Signaling Pathways and Therapeutic Targets in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Llovet, J.M.; Castet, F.; Heikenwalder, M.; Maini, M.K.; Mazzaferro, V.; Pinato, D.J.; Pikarsky, E.; Zhu, A.X.; Finn, R.S. Immunotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 19, 151–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Sangro, B.; Sarobe, P.; Hervás-Stubbs, S.; Melero, I. Advances in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 525–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. de Miguel, M.; Calvo, E. Clinical Challenges of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cancer Cell 2020, 38, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Papadakos, S.P.; Arvanitakis, K.; Stergiou, I.E.; Lekakis, V.; Davakis, S.; Christodoulou, M.I.; Germanidis, G.; Theocharis, S. The Role of TLR4 in the Immunotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Can We Teach an Old Dog New Tricks? Cancers 2023, 15, 2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Papadakos, S.P.; Dedes, N.; Kouroumalis, E.; Theocharis, S. The Role of the NLRP3 Inflammasome in HCC Carcinogenesis and Treatment: Harnessing Innate Immunity. Cancers 2022, 14, 3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Wu, X.; Jin, B.; Liu, X.; Mao, Y.; Wan, X.; Du, S. An immune-related biomarker index for predicting the effectiveness of immunotherapy and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 149, 10319–10333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Rimassa, L.; Finn, R.S.; Sangro, B. Combination immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2023, 79, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Huang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, K.; Feng, L.; Guan, J.; Dong, R.; Liu, J.; Tian, D.; Liu, M.; et al. Combined immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: How to maximize immune checkpoint blockade synergic anti-tumor effect. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2023, 189, 104070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Rizzo, A.; Ricci, A.D.; Brandi, G. Atezolizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Good things come to those who wait. Immunotherapy 2021, 13, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Ligand binding to cytokine receptor leads to the formation of receptor dimerization (1). The dimerization induces the transphosphorylation of JAK as well as phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic tails of the receptors (2). STAT binds to the phosphorylated site of the receptor (3). Subsequently, JAK phosphorylates STAT recruited to the receptors (4). Phosphorylated STATs dissociate from the receptors and form a dimer (5). STAT dimers translocate into the nucleus and induce the transcription of target genes (6). There are three types of negative regulators of the JAK/STAT signaling: suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS), inhibiting the phosphorylation of the receptor by JAK; protein inhibitors of activated STAT (PIAS), preventing the activity of STAT transcription factors; and protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), removing phosphate groups from JAKs and STATs.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Ligand binding to cytokine receptor leads to the formation of receptor dimerization (1). The dimerization induces the transphosphorylation of JAK as well as phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic tails of the receptors (2). STAT binds to the phosphorylated site of the receptor (3). Subsequently, JAK phosphorylates STAT recruited to the receptors (4). Phosphorylated STATs dissociate from the receptors and form a dimer (5). STAT dimers translocate into the nucleus and induce the transcription of target genes (6). There are three types of negative regulators of the JAK/STAT signaling: suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS), inhibiting the phosphorylation of the receptor by JAK; protein inhibitors of activated STAT (PIAS), preventing the activity of STAT transcription factors; and protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), removing phosphate groups from JAKs and STATs.
Ijms 24 13764 g001
Figure 2. Roles of the JAK/STAT signaling in HCC.
Figure 2. Roles of the JAK/STAT signaling in HCC.
Ijms 24 13764 g002
Figure 3. Frequencies of mutations in genes encoding JAK and STAT proteins in HCC. The highest mutation frequencies are observed in IL6ST (encoding the gp130 receptor) and JAK1 among genes encoding major components of the JAK/STAT pathway.
Figure 3. Frequencies of mutations in genes encoding JAK and STAT proteins in HCC. The highest mutation frequencies are observed in IL6ST (encoding the gp130 receptor) and JAK1 among genes encoding major components of the JAK/STAT pathway.
Ijms 24 13764 g003
Figure 4. Roles of cytokines activating the JAK/STAT signaling in HCC. Upward and downward pointing arrows in parentheses indicate activation and suppression, respectively.
Figure 4. Roles of cytokines activating the JAK/STAT signaling in HCC. Upward and downward pointing arrows in parentheses indicate activation and suppression, respectively.
Ijms 24 13764 g004
Table 1. Roles of JAK and STAT proteins.
Table 1. Roles of JAK and STAT proteins.
ProteinRoleReference
JAK1Promotion of inflammatory response
Antiviral effect
Regulation of neurological and lymphocytic function
[14,28,35]
JAK2Regulation of hematopoietic function[14,28]
JAK3Regulation of lymphocyte production and function[14,28]
TYK2Regulation of T cell response and microbial response[14,28]
STAT1Regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis
Inhibition of viral and bacterial infection
[14,18,25,28,34,36,37,38]
STAT2Antiviral effect
Immune regulation
Promotion of tumorigenesis
[14,18,25,28,34,36,37,38]
STAT3Regulation of immune system
Progression of cell cycle
Inhibition of apoptosis
Promotion of tumorigenesis
Maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSCs)
Regulation of hepatic glucogenesis
[14,16,18,25,28,34,36,37,38]
STAT4Regulation of immune system
Regulation of T cell development and function
[14,18,25,28,34,36,37,38]
STAT5Regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis
Regulation of tumor immunity
Tumor progression
[14,18,25,28,34,36,37,38]
STAT6Regulation of lymphocytes
Expression of MHCs and immunoglobulins
[14,18,25,28,34,36,37,38]
Table 3. HCC suppression in xenograft models by inhibiting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.
Table 3. HCC suppression in xenograft models by inhibiting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.
AgentTarget Molecule
(Inhibited Molecule)
HCC Cell Line TransplantedPhenotypeReference
miR-515-5pIL-6
(STAT3)
HepG2Inhibited migration and invasion of HCC cells[160]
EtomidateJAK2HepG2Inhibition of tumor growth
Increase in animal survival
[152]
C1QTNF1-AS1miR-221-3p
(STAT3)
HepG2,
Huh-7
Reduced tumor volumes[161]
CantharidinEphB4 receptor
(JAK2, STAT3)
SMMC-7721Reduced tumor growth[162]
Nitidine chlorideJAK1, STAT3HepG2Reduced tumor volumes[163]
DehydrocrenatidineJAK2HepG2Reduced invasion of HCC
Inhibition of CSC phenotypes
[164]
CIMOJAK1, JAK2, STAT3Huh-7Reduced tumor growth[165]
NapabucasinSTAT3Hepa1-6Reduced tumor volumes
Tumor regression in 25% mice
[158]
OPB-31121STAT3Huh-7,
HepG2
Reduced tumor growth[166]
Table 4. Clinical studies targeting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in HCC.
Table 4. Clinical studies targeting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in HCC.
DrugTargetNCT NumberPhaseStatusClinical Outcomes
ItacitinibJAK104358185IbIn progress,Not yet determined
PravastatinSTAT101075555IIICompleted
(September 2015)
MOS 10.7 m vs. 10.5 m (sorafenib vs. pravastatin + sorafenib)
DanvatirsenSTAT301839604ICompleted
(February 2015)
Limited antitumor activity.
NapabucasinSTAT302279719I/IICompleted
(October 2019)
No significant difference in overall response rates between sorafenib alone and napabucasin + sorafenib groups
OPB-31121STAT301406574I/IICompleted
(March 2014)
Limited antitumor effects and low overall responses.
MOS, mean overall survival.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, H.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.; Moon, H.; Ro, S.W. Exploring the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Unraveling Signaling Complexity and Therapeutic Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241813764

AMA Style

Park H, Lee S, Lee J, Moon H, Ro SW. Exploring the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Unraveling Signaling Complexity and Therapeutic Implications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(18):13764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241813764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Hyunjung, Sangjik Lee, Jaehun Lee, Hyuk Moon, and Simon Weonsang Ro. 2023. "Exploring the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Unraveling Signaling Complexity and Therapeutic Implications" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 18: 13764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241813764

APA Style

Park, H., Lee, S., Lee, J., Moon, H., & Ro, S. W. (2023). Exploring the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Unraveling Signaling Complexity and Therapeutic Implications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(18), 13764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241813764

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop