Next Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Dynamic and Rapid Transcriptional Reprogramming Involved in Heat Stress and Identification of Heat Response Genes in Rice
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Antibacterial Activity and Biosafety through Ultrashort Peptide/Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms241914797
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ecdysteroid Biosynthesis Halloween Gene Spook Plays an Important Role in the Oviposition Process of Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae

by
Liang Wang
1,2,
Zhuo Li
1,2,
Tianci Yi
1,2,
Gang Li
1,2,*,
Guy Smagghe
1,2 and
Daochao Jin
1,2,*
1
Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Agricultural Pest Management of the Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(19), 14797; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914797
Submission received: 21 August 2023 / Revised: 26 September 2023 / Accepted: 27 September 2023 / Published: 30 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In insects, the ecdysteroid hormone regulates development and reproduction. However, its function in the reproduction process of spider mites is still unclear. In this study, we investigated the effect of the Halloween gene Spook on the oviposition of the reproduction process in a spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. The expression patterns of the ecdysteroid biosynthesis and signaling pathway genes, as analyzed by RT-qPCR, showed that the expression pattern of the Halloween genes was similar to the oviposition pattern of the female mite and the expression patterns of the vitellogenesis-related genes TuVg and TuVgR, suggesting that the Halloween genes are involved in the oviposition of spider mites. To investigate the function of the ecdysteroid hormone on the oviposition of the reproduction process, we carried out an RNAi assay against the Halloween gene Spook by injection in female mites. Effective silencing of TuSpo led to a significant reduction of oviposition. In summary, these results provide an initial study on the effect of Halloween genes on the reproduction in T. urticae and may be a foundation for a new strategy to control spider mites.

1. Introduction

The strong reproductive ability of insects allows them to expand the population in a short period, causing severe harm to crops. The reproductive process is regulated by steroid hormones. Ecdysteroid is the main form of insect steroid hormones [1,2] and plays crucial roles in ovarian development processes such as follicle cell formation, vitellogenin production stimulation, ovarian growth, and oocyte maturation [3,4,5,6,7]. Moreover, ecdysteroid could regulate egg production and the expression of oogenic genes in the reproductive process of insects [5,8].
In insects, the ecdysteroid hormone, 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E), is the active form of ecdysteroid is synthesized from cholesterol by a series of enzymes encoded by the Halloween genes, including Spook (Spo, CYP307A1), Phantom (Phm, CYP306A1), Disembodied (Dib, CYP302A1), Shadow (Sad, CYP315A1), and Shade (Shd, CYP314A1) [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Then, the synthesized 20E binds to its heterodimer receptor consisting of the ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) and the retinoid X receptor (RXR) [19,20,21,22] to initiate the transcriptional cascade of the downstream genes, including the early genes E74 and E75, the early-late genes HR3, HR4, E78, and Kr-h1, the late genes FTZ-f1 [15,23,24,25].
The ecdysteroid biosynthesis Halloween genes play an important role in insect reproduction. For instance, in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, RNA interference-mediated knockdown of the Halloween genes induced a significant impact on oocyte development, oviposition, and the hatching of eggs [26,27]. In the supermodel insect, the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, silencing Halloween genes led to a reduction in oviposition [28]. Similar results were also obtained in Diaphorina citri [29]. In the soft tick, Ornithodoros moubata, Spook expression was determined in the ovary from both final instar nymphs and adult females, and shade expression was frequently surged after engorgement and copulation in adult females, suggesting Spook and shade are involved in ovary development [30]. Similar expression was also detected in the Varroa mite, Varroa destructor [31], and in the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria [32]. In the rice planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, silencing the expression of the Spookier led to less oviposition [8]. However, the function of Halloween genes on the reproduction process in spider mites is still unknown.
In Acari, it has previously been reported that the ecdysteroid hormone regulates Vg synthesis in the ixodid tick, Amblyomma hebraeum [33], and egg development in the American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis [34]. However, there is no report about the regulatory function of the ecdysteroid hormone in the reproduction process of spider mites. Tetranychus urticae is an important pest mite in agriculture and can quickly develop resistance to chemical acaricides, in part due to its strong reproduction capacity [35,36].
In this study, we investigated the ecdysteroid biosynthesis and signaling pathway genes in relation to the oviposition of T. urticae. In addition, we performed an RNAi bioassay to illustrate the regulatory function of the ecdysteroid biosynthesis Halloween gene Spook in the reproduction process of the spider mite. We believe that our results can provide new insights into the reproduction regulatory mechanism in mites, and they may potentially be a foundation for a new strategy to control these important pest organisms in agriculture.

2. Results

2.1. Expression Dynamics of the Halloween Genes in the Oviposition Period

To investigate the whole oviposition process of the female mite in T. urticae, we followed the oviposition from the day 1 of the adult stage to death of the female mite (Figure S1). The result showed that there was a significant difference within these 10 days, which could be sorted into two stages: stage I (day 1–7) and stage II (day 8–10) (Figure 1). In stage I, the average daily egg production increased and reached an amount of about 7–8 eggs per day per mite on day 3–4, then followed by a plateau of 5–6 eggs per day per mite between day 5–7. In stage II, the average daily egg production showed a significant drop to 2–3 eggs per day per mite starting on day 8, and this remained until day 10 (Figure 1).
To obtain a deeper insight on the regulatory function of ecdysteroid-related genes in the oviposition process of female mites in T. urticae, we collected female mite samples on a daily basis from day 1 of the adult stage up to the death of the female at day 10. The transcript pattern of the ecdysteroid biosynthesis and signaling pathway genes and the vitellogenesis-related genes were determined by RT-qPCR. For the ecdysteroid biosynthesis Halloween genes, it was interesting that their expression showed a similar pattern as compared to the oviposition dynamics. In detail, the expression of TuSpo, TuDib, TuSad, and TuShd showed an increase during the first 2 days, and then, during the next days (between day 2–6), there were higher levels, but on day 7 there was a dramatic, significant drop (Figure 2A–D). For the ecdysteroid signaling genes, the expression pattern of TuHR3 and TuHR4 showed an increase during the first days with peak levels between day 4–6, and then there was a dramatic drop on day 8 that remained up to day 10 (Figure 2J,K). The expression level of TuRXR1 also increased during the first 3 days, but then decreased gradually to a low level at day 7, and then it increased again (Figure 2F). For TuRXR2 (Figure 2G), the pattern was stable the first 5 days then showed a peak on day 6, and this was followed by lower levels between day 7 and 10. In contrast, the expression levels of TuEcR, TuE78, E75, and TuFtz-f1 showed a more constant pattern (Figure 2E,H,I,L); however, for TuE75 and TuFtz-f1, their stable expression pattern showed a dip on day 2 and day 7, respectively (Figure 2H,L).
To investigate the expression pattern of the vitellogenin genes and their receptor gene in the reproductive process, the expression levels of TuVg1, TuVg2, TuVg3, and TuVgR1 were measured in the female mite samples from day 1 of the adult stage up to the death of the female at day 10, as we had used for the ecdysteroid biosynthesis and signaling pathway genes (see Figure 2). The expression patterns of TuVg1, TuVg2, TuVg3, and TuVgR1 showed an increase between day 1 and day 3–4 (Figure 3A–D), and then at day 7 there was a dramatic drop. Further on, between day 7–10, TuVg1 and TuVgR1 showed a small increase, while the TuVg2 and TuVg3 levels stayed constant at a low level. Interestingly, these expression patterns were similar to those of the Halloween genes and the oviposition dynamics. Our data showed that the ecdysteroid biosynthesis genes have a positive correlation with the vitellogenin genes and their receptor gene, suggesting that the ecdysteroid biosynthesis pathway genes are involved in regulating the vitellogenesis process of T. urticae reproduction.

2.2. RNAi of Halloween Gene Spook Reduced the Female Oviposition of T. urticae

To evaluate the regulation function of the ecdysteroid hormone on the oviposition of female mites in T. urticae, RNAi of the Halloween gene Spook was performed based on the positive relationship between the expression pattern of this ecdysteroid biosynthesis gene (Figure 2A) and the oviposition dynamics (Figure 1). The silencing efficiency against TuSpo at 24 h after injection of dsTuSpo was 64% (p < 0.0001) compared to the control group injected with dsegfp (Figure 4A). For the RNAi-female mites, the total number of eggs laid per female mite was significantly reduced by 69% (p = 0.0017) compared with the dsegfp-control mites (Figure 4C). In detail, the average daily number of eggs in the control group showed an increase between day 2–3 and day 8, while the oviposition in the RNAi-female mites was significantly reduced in this period by about 50–80% based on average numbers (Figure 4B). In addition, we analyzed the oviposition period in dsTuSpo-treated female mites and found that it was significantly shorter than in the dsegfp-control (p = 0.0001) (Figure 4D). Similarly, the lifespan of the dsTuSpo-females was significantly shorter (p < 0.0001) (Figure S2). These results indicate that Halloween genes are involved in the oviposition regulation of T. urticae. But there were no effects of the RNAi treatment (after injection of 60–80 ng of dsTuSpo per female mite) in the offspring of the surviving females (Table S1).

2.3. Effect of Halloween Gene Spook Silencing on the Transcript Levels of Other Genes Downstream

In this part, we investigated the RNAi effect of TuSpo on the expression of other ecdysteroid biosynthesis and pathway genes and also on that of the vitellogenesis-related genes by use of RT-qPCR. The expression levels of TuDib and TuSad showed no difference in the dsTuSpo-injected group, while that of TuShd was reduced by 22% (p = 0.0195) (Figure 5A). Similarly, the expression of the ecdysteroid receptor TuEcR was reduced by 38% (p = 0.0197), while there were no differences for TuRXR1 and TuRXR2 (Figure 5B). Also, for the ecdysteroid signaling pathway genes, there is no difference in the expression level of TuHR4, TuHR3, TuE75, TuE78, and TuFtz-f1 (Figure 5C). For the vitellogenesis-related genes, the expressions of TuVg1, TuVg2, and TuVgR1 were reduced by 40% (p = 0.0125), 50% (p = 0.0034), and 41% (p = 0.0041), respectively; for TuVg3, we also saw a small decrease in expression, but this was not significant (p = 0.0934) (Figure 5D).

3. Discussion

In insects, ecdysteroid hormone plays a vital role in reproduction by regulating the physiological process [3,5,7,37,38]. In D. melanogaster, ecdysteroid could regulate the germline stem cell increase induced by mating and egg production to sustain reproductive success response to the mating [39]. It also could regulate the timing of border-cell migration to affect ovary development [40]. The regulatory mechanism of ecdysteroid for the vitellogenin biosynthesis and oogenesis in other insects has been abundantly reported [41,42,43,44,45]. In Acari, observations of ecdysteroid hormone stimulating the synthesis of vitellogenin and being involved in oogenesis have also been reported in ticks [33,34,46,47]. However, little information on the regulatory function of the ecdysteroid hormone in the reproduction of spider mites is available.
In this study, it was interesting that we found that the expression patterns of the Halloween genes in the reproduction process of T. urticae were in accordance with the oviposition dynamic and the expression patterns of the vitellogenesis-related genes TuVg and TuVgR. In addition, in an RNAi assay, the knockdown of the Halloween gene TuSpo provoked a significant decrease in TuVg and TuVgR and also a significantly reduced oviposition. Therefore, we believe that our results demonstrated that the Halloween gene TuSpo is involved in the regulation of vitellogenin biosynthesis to govern the oviposition of the reproduction process in T. urticae. To a similar extent, in S. gregaria and D. citri, the expression levels of Halloween genes decreased after adult molting, then increased gradually during the female reproductive cycle [27,29,48]. In V. destructor, three Halloween genes, Spo, Dib, and Shd, were up-regulated during the reproductive stage [31]. These previous studies in insects are consistent with ours in spider mites. In insects, the RNAi-mediated knockdown of an ecdysteroid biosynthesis Halloween gene also could disrupt the expression of Vg or VgR and decrease number of eggs in the oviposition process [6,38,49,50,51]. Based on the abovementioned results in insects and mites, we believe that this approach can provide a new control strategy of important pests. Indeed, interference in the ecdysteroid signaling pathway can be performed by agonists and antagonists also of natural products from botanic origin [52,53,54,55]. Silencing the expression of TuSpo resulted in a severe decrease in oviposition. These results were similar to those reported in S. gregaria, where the downregulation of Spo resulted in shorter oocyte length, smaller eggs, and less hatching [27]. In D. melanogaster, the downregulation of Shd also resulted in a lower oviposition, but the effect was milder [28]. Based on previous experiments in insects and ticks together with our current results in spider mites, we believe that we can conclude that the ecdysteroid hormone plays a pivotal role in reproduction, specifically in the expression of the vitellogenesis-related genes. However, more investigations, for instance, on other regulatory (co-)factors and/or transcription factors such as as nuclear receptors [56], are necessary to better understand the regulatory cascade of vitellogenesis, which is the yolk protein formation in the oocytes, and the processes of germline formation, oogenesis, and choriogenesis in the female mite.
Hence, we hope that in the near future there may be an optimization of the analytical methodologies to determine the ecdysteroid hormone titer in the tiny organisms of spider mites. Today, advanced liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) technology could determine the ecdysteroid hormone (ponasterone A) in one sample of 500 mg of spider mites (i.e., mixed ages of nymphs and female adults) [18]. Such technology development is needed and will certainly stimulate more fundamental insights on the relationship between hormone titers, Halloween expression levels and the development and reproduction in spider mites and other tiny organisms in the clade of Ecdysozoa.
On the effect that we observed against the lifespan in dsTuSpo-injected female mites of T. urticae, we can, however, not yet explain the regulatory mechanism behind it. Indeed, it should be remarked here that, today, there is little to no information on this aspect. In some insects, a relationship has been reported between ecdysteroid and juvenile hormone (JH) and the insect lifespan [57,58,59,60]. We hope that future research will be performed to better understand the regulation of lifespan in spider mites as well.
In our RNAi experiment with dsTuSpo in T. urticae, we did not observe any effect on the offspring of the surviving females. We believe that this is most likely related to the amount of dsRNA injected, which was 60–80 ng per female in the current experiment. We expect that higher amounts of dsRNA can provide a clear transgenerational effect as has been seen in other insects. In S. gregaria and N. lugens, knockdown of Halloween genes resulted in a significant reduction of egg hatching [8,27]. Also, strong transgenerational effects have been reported in stinkbugs of Euschistus heros after dsRNA treatment of the female adults [61]. Hence, in a previous experiment with T. urticae, 2000 ng/µL of dsRNA was treated via a leaf disc and fed to spider mite females, and this treatment produced phenotypic effects in 3.6% of the offspring [62], confirming that a transgenerational activity by RNAi is possible in spider mites, but the effects depend on the concentration of dsRNA. Finally, we also believe that the modern technology of CRISPR/Cas9 has the potential to introduce new control technique based on essential genes, as has been seen in different pest insects, for instance, in relation to ecdysteroid hormone production and to realize sterility [63,64,65].
In conclusion, in this project with spider mites of T. urticae, the silencing of the Halloween gene Spook reduced the expression of the vitellogenin genes and their receptor gene, which led to a significant decrease in the egg production of female mites. These results illustrate that Spook plays a crucial role in regulating the oviposition in the reproduction process in T. urticae, as presented in Figure 6. We believe that this regulatory function may provide a new way to control spider mites of T. urticae and thereby avoid the rapid increase in resistance caused, in part, by the very high reproductive capacity of these important pest organisms. The new information from this project provides a better understanding of the ecdysteroid hormone activity in spider mites on the regulation of their reproduction; however, more research is still needed, as discussed above.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Culturing of Mites and Oviposition Statistics

The sensitive/wild mite strain was derived from the Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China and has been reared for more than ten years in-house and without exposure to pesticides. The mites were reared on beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) at 27 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% relative humidity, and a photoperiod of 14 h:10 h (L:D) in the laboratory as described before [66]. For the experiments, unfertilized adult female mites that molted for the last time in the same development period were screened for oviposition every 24 h until they stopped egg-laying. When there were no eggs for three consecutive days, the females were considered to have stopped laying eggs. These unfertilized adult females were not paired for the entire statistical period. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test was used to analyze the significant difference.

4.2. Expression Dynamics of the Halloween Genes in the Oviposition Period

To investigate the detailed expression dynamics of the Halloween genes (TuSpo, TuDib, TuSad, and TuShd) on different days, we collected adult female mite samples at different reproductive times at 24 h intervals starting from molting. The day that the mite had molted into the adult stage was named day 1. Every individual sample included 50 female mites, and four biological replicates were conducted. Total RNA of all samples was extracted using TRIzol (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA integrity was checked on a 1% agarose gel, and its concentration was measured with a NanoDrop and Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). StarScript II RT Mix with gDNA Remover (GenStar, Beijing, China) was used to synthesize the first-strand cDNA. Every cDNA was diluted 25-fold using RNase-free water and stored at −20 °C. The reverse transcription–quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) specific primers were designed using the NCBI primer designing tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/, accessed on 11 April 2022). The 10.0 µL reaction system contained 5.0 µL of 2x RealStar Green Fast Mixture (GenStar, Beijing, China), 0.5 µL of forward primer, 0.5 µL of reverse primer, and 4.0 µL of cDNA. The reference gene ATP was used to normalize gene expression levels [66]. The relative expression levels were calculated using the method of 2−ΔΔCT. ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test was used to analyze the significant difference in gene expressions in SPSS version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

4.3. RNAi of TuSpo

The dsRNA was synthesized in vitro using the Transcript Aid T7 High Yield Transcription Kit (Thermo Scientific, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A total of 20 µL of the resulting transcripts was purified according to the kit instructions, to assure the quality of the synthesized dsRNA, and stored at −80 °C. The virgin adult female mites that had molted in the adult stage within 12 h were used for the RNAi experiment. Our injection method referred to previously existing injection methods [62,67,68]. Approximately 6–8 nL (concentration: 10 µg/µL) of dsRNA was injected into the mites. After injection, four biological replicates were performed to detect the silencing efficiency of Halloween gene by RT-qPCR at 24 h, and other female mites were assigned for phenotypic observation (egg-laying, oviposition cycle, and lifespan). The treatment of dsegfp was performed as a control. The oviposition was counted at 24 h intervals until the female mites died at day 10. Student’s t-tests were used to determine the significant differences between treatment and control groups (dsegfp). To evaluate the effects of dsRNA on the next generation, we analyzed the offspring development. In addition, the expressions of other Halloween genes, the ecdysteroid signaling pathway genes, and the vitellogenesis-related genes Vg and VgR were investigated.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241914797/s1.

Author Contributions

L.W., D.J. and G.L. conceived the study and participated in its design. L.W. and Z.L. performed the population and sample collection during the oviposition process of female mites. L.W., T.Y. and G.L. analyzed the data. L.W., D.J., G.L. and G.S. prepared the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Foundation (QianKeHeJiChu ZK [2022]-YiBan065), the Special Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou University (Gui Da Te Gang He Zi [2022]13), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (3175002), and the Project of Occurrence, Monitoring, and Investigation and Integrated Prevention and Control Technology of major pest mites from Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China (No. 15226022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or supplementary material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Niwa, R.; Niwa, Y.S. Enzymes for ecdysteroid biosynthesis: Their biological functions in insects and beyond. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2014, 78, 1283–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schwedes, C.C.; Carney, G.E. Ecdysone signalling in adult Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 2012, 58, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Belles, X.; Piulachs, M.D. Ecdysone signalling and ovarian development in insects: From stem cells to ovarian follicle formation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1849, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Morris, L.X.; Spradling, A.C. Steroid signaling within Drosophila ovarian epithelial cells sex-specifically modulates early germ cell development and meiotic entry. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Swevers, L. An update on ecdysone signaling during insect oogenesis. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2019, 31, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Parthasarathy, R.; Sheng, Z.; Sun, Z.; Palli, S.R. Ecdysteroid regulation of ovarian growth and oocyte maturation in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Swevers, L.; Iatrou, K. The ecdysone regulatory cascade and ovarian development in lepidopteran insects: Insights from the silkmoth paradigm. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 33, 1285–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhou, X.; Ye, Y.Z.; Ogihara, M.H.; Takeshima, M.; Fujinaga, D.; Liu, C.W.; Zhu, Z.; Kataoka, H.; Bao, Y.Y. Functional analysis of ecdysteroid biosynthetic enzymes of the rice planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 123, 103428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lenaerts, C.; Van Wielendaele, P.; Peeters, P.; Vanden Broeck, J.; Marchal, E. Ecdysteroid signalling components in metamorphosis and development of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 75, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jia, S.; Wan, P.J.; Li, G.Q. Molecular cloning and characterization of the putative Halloween gene Phantom from the small brown planthopper Laodelphax striatellus. Insect Sci. 2015, 22, 707–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jia, S.; Wan, P.J.; Zhou, L.T.; Mu, L.L.; Li, G.Q. Molecular cloning and RNA interference-mediated functional characterization of a Halloween gene spook in the white-backed planthopper Sogatella furcifera. BMC Mol. Biol. 2013, 14, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Niwa, R.; Matsuda, T.; Yoshiyama, T.; Namiki, T.; Mita, K.; Fujimoto, Y.; Kataoka, H. CYP306A1, a cytochrome P450 enzyme, is essential for ecdysteroid biosynthesis in the prothoracic glands of Bombyx and Drosophila. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 35942–35949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rewitz, K.F.; O’Connor, M.B.; Gilbert, L.I. Molecular evolution of the insect Halloween family of cytochrome P450s: Phylogeny, gene organization and functional conservation. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 37, 741–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rewitz, K.F.; Rybczynski, R.; Warren, J.T.; Gilbert, L.I. The Halloween genes code for cytochrome P450 enzymes mediating synthesis of the insect moulting hormone. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, 34, 1256–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Schumann, I.; Kenny, N.; Hui, J.; Hering, L.; Mayer, G. Halloween genes in panarthropods and the evolution of the early moulting pathway in Ecdysozoa. Royal Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 180888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Marchal, E.; Vandersmissen, H.P.; Badisco, L.; Van de Velde, S.; Van Wielendaele, P.; Verlinden, H.; Iga, M.; Huybrechts, R.; Simonet, G.; Smagghe, G.; et al. Control of ecdysteroidogenesis in prothoracic glands of insects: A review. Peptides 2010, 31, 506–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Christiaens, O.; Iga, M.; Velarde, R.; Rougé, P.; Smagghe, G. Halloween genes and nuclear receptors in ecdysteroid biosynthesis and signaling in the pea aphid. Insect Mol. Biol. 2010, 19, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Grbic, M.; Van Leeuwen, T.; Clark, R.M.; Rombauts, S.; Rouze, P.; Grbic, V.; Osborne, E.J.; Dermauw, W.; Ngoc, P.C.; Ortego, F.; et al. The International spider mite genome consortium, The genome of Tetranychus urticae reveals herbivorous pest adaptations. Nature 2011, 479, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Elgendy, A.M.; Elmogy, M.; Takeda, M. Molecular cloning, characterization, and expression pattern of the Ultraspiracle gene homolog (RXR/USP) from the hemimetabolous insect Periplaneta americana (Dictyoptera, Blattidae) during vitellogenesis. Mol. Biotechnol. 2014, 56, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hult, E.F.; Huang, J.; Marchal, E.; Lam, J.; Tobe, S.S. RXR/USP and EcR are critical for the regulation of reproduction and the control of JH biosynthesis in Diploptera punctata. J. Insect Physiol. 2015, 80, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tarrant, A.M.; Behrendt, L.; Stegeman, J.J.; Verslycke, T. Ecdysteroid receptor from the American lobster Homarus americanus: EcR/RXR isoform cloning and ligand-binding properties. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2011, 173, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, G.; Liu, X.Y.; Smagghe, G.; Niu, J.Z.; Wang, J.J. Molting process revealed by the detailed expression profiles of RXR1/RXR2 and mining the associated genes in a spider mite, Panonychus citri. Insect Sci. 2022, 29, 430–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, G.; Liu, X.Y.; Han, X.; Niu, J.Z.; Wang, J.J. RNAi of the nuclear receptor HR3 suggests a role in the molting process of the spider mite Panonychus citri. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2020, 81, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Schwedes, C.; Tulsiani, S.; Carney, G.E. Ecdysone receptor expression and activity in adult Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 2011, 57, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Iga, M.; Smagghe, G. Identification and expression profile of Halloween genes involved in ecdysteroid biosynthesis in Spodoptera littoralis. Peptides 2010, 31, 456–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sugahara, R.; Tanaka, S.; Shiotsuki, T. RNAi-mediated knockdown of Spook reduces ecdysteroid titers and causes precocious metamorphosis in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. Dev. Biol. 2017, 429, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Schellens, S.; Lenaerts, C.; Perez Baca, M.D.R.; Cools, D.; Peeters, P.; Marchal, E.; Vanden Broeck, J. Knockdown of the Halloween genes Spook, Shadow and Shade influences oocyte development, egg shape, oviposition and hatching in the desert locust. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Knapp, E.; Sun, J. Steroid signalling in mature follicles is important for Drosophila ovulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 699–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, C.; Wan, B.; Jin, M.R.; Wang, J.; Xin, T.R.; Zou, Z.W.; Xia, B. The loss of Halloween gene function seriously affects the development and reproduction of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) and increases its susceptibility to pesticides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2023, 191, 105361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ogihara, M.H.; Hikiba, J.; Suzuki, Y.; Taylor, D.; Kataoka, H. Ovarian ecdysteroidogenesis in both immature and mature stages of an Acari, Ornithodoros moubata. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cabrera, A.R.; Shirk, P.D.; Evans, J.D.; Hung, K.; Sims, J.; Alborn, H.; Teal, P.E. Three Halloween genes from the Varroa mite, Varroa destructor (Anderson & Trueman) and their expression during reproduction. Insect Mol. Biol. 2015, 24, 277–292. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gijbels, M.; Schellens, S.; Schellekens, T.; Bruyninckx, E.; Marchal, E.; Vanden Broeck, J. Precocious downregulation of Kruppel-Homolog 1 in the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria, gives rise to an adultoid phenotype with accelerated ovarian development but disturbed mating and oviposition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Friesen, K.J.; Reuben Kaufman, W. Quantification of vitellogenesis and its control by 20-hydroxyecdysone in the ixodid tick, Amblyomma hebraeum. J. Insect Physiol. 2002, 48, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Thompson, D.M.; Khalil, S.M.; Jeffers, L.A.; Ananthapadmanaban, U.; Sonenshine, D.E.; Mitchell, R.D.; Osgood, C.J.; Apperson, C.S.; Michael Roe, R. In vivo role of 20-hydroxyecdysone in the regulation of the vitellogenin mRNA and egg development in the American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis (Say). J. Insect Physiol. 2005, 51, 1105–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Van Leeuwen, T.; Vontas, J.; Tsagkarakou, A.; Dermauw, W.; Tirry, L. Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: A review. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wei, P.; Chen, M.; Nan, C.; Feng, K.; Shen, G.; Cheng, J.; He, L. Downregulation of carboxylesterase contributes to cyflumetofen resistance in Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval). Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2166–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wu, Z.; Yang, L.; He, Q.; Zhou, S. Regulatory mechanisms of vitellogenesis in insects. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 593613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Roy, S.; Saha, T.T.; Zou, Z.; Raikhel, A.S. Regulatory pathways controlling female insect reproduction. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 489–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ameku, T.; Niwa, R. Mating-induced increase in germline stem cells via the neuroendocrine system in female Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jang, A.C.; Chang, Y.C.; Bai, J.; Montell, D. Border-cell migration requires integration of spatial and temporal signals by the BTB protein Abrupt. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mello, T.R.P.; Aleixo, A.C.; Pinheiro, D.G.; Nunes, F.M.F.; Cristino, A.S.; Bitondi, M.M.G.; Barchuk, A.R.; Simoes, Z.L.P. Hormonal control and target genes of Ftz-f1 expression in the honeybee Apis mellifera: A positive loop linking juvenile hormone, Ftz-f1, and vitellogenin. Insect Mol. Biol. 2019, 28, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tan, Y.A.; Zhao, X.D.; Sun, H.J.; Zhao, J.; Xiao, L.B.; Hao, D.J.; Jiang, Y.P. Phospholipase C gamma (PLCgamma) regulates soluble trehalase in the 20E-induced fecundity of Apolygus lucorum. Insect Sci. 2021, 28, 430–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tan, Y.A.; Zhao, X.D.; Sun, Y.; Hao, D.J.; Zhao, J.; Jiang, Y.P.; Bai, L.X.; Xiao, L.B. The nuclear hormone receptor E75A regulates vitellogenin gene (Al-Vg) expression in the mirid bug Apolygus lucorum. Insect Mol. Biol. 2018, 27, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Parthasarathy, R.; Palli, S.R. Molecular analysis of nutritional and hormonal regulation of female reproduction in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 41, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shi, Y.; Liu, T.Y.; Jiang, H.B.; Liu, X.Q.; Dou, W.; Park, Y.; Smagghe, G.; Wang, J.J. The ecdysis triggering hormone system, via ETH/ETHR-B, is essential for successful reproduction of a major pest insect, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Friesen, K.J.; Kaufman, W.R. Effects of 20-hydroxyecdysone and other hormones on egg development, and identification of a vitellin-binding protein in the ovary of the tick, Amblyomma hebraeum. J. Insect Physiol. 2004, 50, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Seixas, A.; Friesen, K.J.; Kaufman, W.R. Effect of 20-hydroxyecdysone and haemolymph on oogenesis in the ixodid tick Amblyomma hebraeum. J. Insect Physiol. 2008, 54, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marchal, E.; Badisco, L.; Verlinden, H.; Vandersmissen, T.; Van Soest, S.; Van Wielendaele, P.; Vanden Broeck, J. Role of the Halloween genes, Spook and Phantom in ecdysteroidogenesis in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. J. Insect Physiol. 2011, 57, 1240–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Peng, L.; Wang, L.; Zou, M.M.; Vasseur, L.; Chu, L.N.; Qin, Y.D.; Zhai, Y.L.; You, M.S. Identification of Halloween genes and RNA interference-mediated functional characterization of a Halloween gene Shadow in Plutella xylostella. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hu, K.; Fu, B.; Wang, C.; Liu, J.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, J.; Li, Y.; Pan, Q.; Liu, F. The role of 20E biosynthesis relative gene Shadow in the reproduction of the predatory mirid bug, Cyrtorhinus lividipennis (Hemiptera: Miridae). Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 109, e21854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Z.; Nanda, S.; Yang, C.; Chen, S.; Guo, M.; Khan, M.M.; Qiu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Pan, H. RNAi suppression of the nuclear receptor Ftz-f1 impaired ecdysis, pupation, and reproduction in the 28-spotted potato ladybeetle, Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 182, 105029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Smagghe, G.; Zotti, M.; Retnakaran, A. Targeting female reproduction in insects with biorational insecticides for pest management: A critical review with suggestions for future research. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2019, 31, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Smagghe, G.; Degheele, D. Action of a novel nonsteroidal ecdysteroid mimic, tebufenozide (RH-5992), on insects of different orders. Pestic. Sci. 1994, 42, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dhadialla, T.S.; Retnakaran, A.; Smagghe, G. Insect growth and development disrupting insecticides. In Insect Control; Gilbert, L.I., Gill, S.S., Eds.; Elsevier/Academic Press: London, UK, 2010; pp. 679–740. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zotti, M.J.; De Geyter, E.; Swevers, L.; Braz, A.S.K.; Scott, L.P.B.; Rougé, P.; Toledano, J.C.; Guedes, J.V.C.; Grutzmacher, A.D.; Lenardão, E.J.; et al. A cell-based reporter assay for screening for EcR agonist/antagonist activity of natural ecdysteroids in Lepidoptera (Bm5) and Diptera (S2) cell cultures, followed by modeling of EcR interactions and normal modes analysis. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2013, 107, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Fahrbach, S.E.; Smagghe, G.; Velarde, R.A. Insect nuclear receptors. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2012, 57, 83–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Amdam, G.V.; Simoes, Z.L.; Hagen, A.; Norberg, K.; Schroder, K.; Mikkelsen, O.; Kirkwood, T.B.; Omholt, S.W. Hormonal control of the yolk precursor vitellogenin regulates immune function and longevity in honeybees. Exp. Gerontol. 2004, 39, 767–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Corona, M.; Velarde, R.A.; Remolina, S.; Moran-Lauter, A.; Wang, Y.; Hughes, K.A.; Robinson, G.E. Vitellogenin, juvenile hormone, insulin signaling, and queen honey bee longevity. Pro. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 7128–7133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hossain, M.S.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, S.; Li, K.; Tian, L.; Li, S. 20-Hydroxyecdysone-induced transcriptional activity of FoxO upregulates brummer and acid lipase-1 and promotes lipolysis in Bombyx fat body. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 43, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Antebi, A. Regulation of longevity by the reproductive system. Exp. Gerontol. 2013, 48, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cagliari, D.; Taning, C.N.T.; Christiaens, O.; De Schutter, K.; Lewille, B.; Dewettinck, K.; Zotti, M.; Smagghe, G. Parental RNA interference as a tool to study genes involved in rostrum development in the Neotropical brown stink bug, Euschistus heros. J. Insect Physiol. 2020, 128, 104161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wei, P.; Wang, C.; Li, C.; Chen, M.; Sun, J.; Van Leeuwen, T.; He, L. Comparing the efficiency of RNAi after feeding and injection of dsRNA in spider mites. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 179, 104966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Taning, C.N.T.; Yu, N.; Van Eynde, B.; Ma, S.; Smagghe, G. CRISPR/Cas9 in insects: Applications, best practices and biosafety concerns. J. Insect Physiol. 2017, 98, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, J.J.; Shi, Y.; Wu, J.N.; Li, H.; Smagghe, G.; Liu, T.X. CRISPR/Cas9 in Lepidopteran insects: Progress, application and prospects. J. Insect Physiol. 2021, 135, 104325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Li, J.J.; Xu, H.M.; Zhao, H.Z.; Pan, M.Z.; Smagghe, G.; Li, Z.Y.; Liu, T.J.; Shi, Y. Regulating role of neuropeptide PTTH releaved in Spodoptera frugiperda using RNAi- and CRISPR/Cas9-based functional genomic tools. Entomol. Gen. 2023, 43, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, G.; Sun, Q.Z.; Liu, X.Y.; Zhang, J.; Dou, W.; Niu, J.Z.; Wang, J.J. Expression dynamics of key ecdysteroid and juvenile hormone biosynthesis genes imply a coordinated regulation pattern in the molting process of a spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2019, 78, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, G.; Niu, J.; Zotti, M.; Sun, Q.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, J.; Liao, C.; Dou, W.; Wei, D.; Wang, J.J.; et al. Characterization and expression patterns of key ecdysteroid biosynthesis and signaling genes in a spider mite (Panonychus citri). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 87, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dermauw, W.; Jonckheere, W.; Riga, M.; Livadaras, I.; Vontas, J.; Van Leeuwen, T. Targeted mutagenesis using CRISPR-Cas9 in the chelicerate herbivore Tetranychus urticae. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 120, 103347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 14797 g001
Figure 1. Average daily egg production (number of eggs per day and per mite) of female adult mites of T. urticae from the 1st day of the adult stage (=day 1) until death of the female mite at day 10. Every point represents a biological replicate and each replicate included 15 mites. In this experiment, we performed eight biological replicates per time point (day). The results are presented as mean (±SE) based on eight biological replicates per day. Lowercase letters above each column indicate significant differences amongst the ten days using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Average daily egg production (number of eggs per day and per mite) of female adult mites of T. urticae from the 1st day of the adult stage (=day 1) until death of the female mite at day 10. Every point represents a biological replicate and each replicate included 15 mites. In this experiment, we performed eight biological replicates per time point (day). The results are presented as mean (±SE) based on eight biological replicates per day. Lowercase letters above each column indicate significant differences amongst the ten days using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 14797 g001
Ijms 24 14797 g002
Figure 2. Expression pattern of the ecdysteroid biosynthesis Halloween genes (A–D) and the ecdysteroid signaling pathway genes (E–L) in female mites of T. urticae as determined by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). The relative expression levels were calculated using the method of 2−ΔΔCT and based on the value of the lowest expression level. Lowercase letters above each bar indicate significant differences amongst the ten days using one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Expression pattern of the ecdysteroid biosynthesis Halloween genes (A–D) and the ecdysteroid signaling pathway genes (E–L) in female mites of T. urticae as determined by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). The relative expression levels were calculated using the method of 2−ΔΔCT and based on the value of the lowest expression level. Lowercase letters above each bar indicate significant differences amongst the ten days using one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 14797 g002
Ijms 24 14797 g003
Figure 3. Expression pattern of the vitellogenesis-related genes, Vg (A–C) and VgR (D), in female mites of T. urticae as determined RT-qPCR. The relative expression levels were calculated using the method of 2−ΔΔCT and based on the value of the lowest expression level. Lowercase letters above each bar indicate significant differences amongst the ten days using ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Expression pattern of the vitellogenesis-related genes, Vg (A–C) and VgR (D), in female mites of T. urticae as determined RT-qPCR. The relative expression levels were calculated using the method of 2−ΔΔCT and based on the value of the lowest expression level. Lowercase letters above each bar indicate significant differences amongst the ten days using ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 14797 g003
Ijms 24 14797 g004
Figure 4. RNAi effects against TuSpo by injection in female mites of T. urticae. (A) The silencing efficiency of TuSpo was detected by RT-qPCR at 24 h after the female mites were injected with 60–80 ng of dsTuSpo. The mean (±SE) expression level is based on four biological replicates, and each replicate consisted of 50 mites. The relative expression was calculated based on the value of dsefgp (control). The down arrow indicates a decrease of 64% in relative expression of TuSpo. (B) Effects of dsTuSpo injection in female mites against the average daily egg production. Every point represented a small round leaf (2 cm diameter) with 5 mites on each leaf. The mean (±SE) average daily egg production is based on 18 biological replicates. (C) Effects of dsTuSpo injection in female mites on the total egg number. The mean (±SE) total egg number is based on four biological replicates, and we used 25 female mites per replicate. The down arrow indicates a decrease of 61% in total egg number. (D) Effects of dsTuSpo injection in female mites on the oviposition cycle. The mean (±SE) oviposition period is based on 18 biological replicates, and we used 5 mites per replicate. The significant difference between the two groups is indicated with ‘**’, p < 0.01, ‘***’, p < 0.001 and ‘****’, p < 0.0001 after a Student’s t-test.
Figure 4. RNAi effects against TuSpo by injection in female mites of T. urticae. (A) The silencing efficiency of TuSpo was detected by RT-qPCR at 24 h after the female mites were injected with 60–80 ng of dsTuSpo. The mean (±SE) expression level is based on four biological replicates, and each replicate consisted of 50 mites. The relative expression was calculated based on the value of dsefgp (control). The down arrow indicates a decrease of 64% in relative expression of TuSpo. (B) Effects of dsTuSpo injection in female mites against the average daily egg production. Every point represented a small round leaf (2 cm diameter) with 5 mites on each leaf. The mean (±SE) average daily egg production is based on 18 biological replicates. (C) Effects of dsTuSpo injection in female mites on the total egg number. The mean (±SE) total egg number is based on four biological replicates, and we used 25 female mites per replicate. The down arrow indicates a decrease of 61% in total egg number. (D) Effects of dsTuSpo injection in female mites on the oviposition cycle. The mean (±SE) oviposition period is based on 18 biological replicates, and we used 5 mites per replicate. The significant difference between the two groups is indicated with ‘**’, p < 0.01, ‘***’, p < 0.001 and ‘****’, p < 0.0001 after a Student’s t-test.
Ijms 24 14797 g004
Ijms 24 14797 g005
Figure 5. Relative expression levels of the ecdysteroid biosynthesis and signaling pathway genes and the vitellogenesis-related genes in female mites of T. urticae, as determined by RT-qPCR at 24 h after the female mites were injected with 60–80 ng of dsTuSpo. (A) Relative expression levels of the other ecdysteroid biosynthesis Halloween genes TuDib, TuSad, and TuShd. (B) Relative expression levels of the ecdysteroid receptor complex genes TuEcR, TuRXR1, and TuRXR2. (C) Relative expression levels of the ecdysteroid signaling genes TuHR4, TuHR3, TuE75, TuE78, and TuFTZ-f1. (D) Relative expression the vitellogenin genes and their receptor gene, TuVg1, TuVg2, TuVg3, and TuVgR1. The mean (±SE) expression level is based on four biological replicates, and we used 50 mites per replicate. Significant differences between the treatment and control are indicated with ‘*’, p < 0.05 and ‘**’, p < 0.01 after a Student’s t-test.
Figure 5. Relative expression levels of the ecdysteroid biosynthesis and signaling pathway genes and the vitellogenesis-related genes in female mites of T. urticae, as determined by RT-qPCR at 24 h after the female mites were injected with 60–80 ng of dsTuSpo. (A) Relative expression levels of the other ecdysteroid biosynthesis Halloween genes TuDib, TuSad, and TuShd. (B) Relative expression levels of the ecdysteroid receptor complex genes TuEcR, TuRXR1, and TuRXR2. (C) Relative expression levels of the ecdysteroid signaling genes TuHR4, TuHR3, TuE75, TuE78, and TuFTZ-f1. (D) Relative expression the vitellogenin genes and their receptor gene, TuVg1, TuVg2, TuVg3, and TuVgR1. The mean (±SE) expression level is based on four biological replicates, and we used 50 mites per replicate. Significant differences between the treatment and control are indicated with ‘*’, p < 0.05 and ‘**’, p < 0.01 after a Student’s t-test.
Ijms 24 14797 g005
Ijms 24 14797 g006
Figure 6. Scheme proposing the ecdysteroid biosynthesis and signaling cascade pathway regulating vitellogenesis and reproduction in T. urticae. Lowercase letters above the average daily egg production indicate significant differences during the first six days (day 1–6) in the adult stage using ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05). ‘*’ indicates a significant difference of change during day 1–6 in the adult stage for the relative expression levels of the respective gene. Data on egg production and expression of genes are based on Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3.
Figure 6. Scheme proposing the ecdysteroid biosynthesis and signaling cascade pathway regulating vitellogenesis and reproduction in T. urticae. Lowercase letters above the average daily egg production indicate significant differences during the first six days (day 1–6) in the adult stage using ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05). ‘*’ indicates a significant difference of change during day 1–6 in the adult stage for the relative expression levels of the respective gene. Data on egg production and expression of genes are based on Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3.
Ijms 24 14797 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Yi, T.; Li, G.; Smagghe, G.; Jin, D. Ecdysteroid Biosynthesis Halloween Gene Spook Plays an Important Role in the Oviposition Process of Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14797. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914797

AMA Style

Wang L, Li Z, Yi T, Li G, Smagghe G, Jin D. Ecdysteroid Biosynthesis Halloween Gene Spook Plays an Important Role in the Oviposition Process of Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(19):14797. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914797

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Liang, Zhuo Li, Tianci Yi, Gang Li, Guy Smagghe, and Daochao Jin. 2023. "Ecdysteroid Biosynthesis Halloween Gene Spook Plays an Important Role in the Oviposition Process of Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 19: 14797. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914797

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop