Next Article in Journal
Isolation and Identification of Lipid-Lowering Peptides from Sacha Inchi Meal
Next Article in Special Issue
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Meta-Analysis of the Frequency of ACE I/D Polymorphisms in Centenarians and Other Long-Lived Individuals
Previous Article in Journal
Pathophysiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Innate Immune System
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Identification of Aging and Young Subtypes for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Prognosis and Immunotherapy Responses

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1516; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021516 (registering DOI)
by Lulu Tan 1,†, Xiakeerzhati Xiaohalati 2,†, Feng Liu 3, Jia Liu 3, Haoyu Fu 1, Yang Zhang 2, Jinbo Gao 1, Kaixiong Tao 1, Guobin Wang 1, Lin Wang 2,* and Zheng Wang 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1516; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021516 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 16 December 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

 

Thank you for your submission.

 

Comments:

1. As we know, the consensus molecular subtype (CMS) of colorectal cancer is currently one of the most important prognostic classifications for these neoplasms. Please add a brief description for CMS in your introduction and also explain any genetic mutation differences or overlaps between your suggested aging subgroups and this classification in the discussion section.

2. Please move the methods section before the results.

3.  Graph (g) of figure 1 is vague. To illustrate the relationships between the clinicopathological features and aging-regulated gene subgroups, adding a table with statistical significance is more appropriate.

4. In Kaplan–Meier curves, the time has been defined by days. It is usually defined by months or years. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Thank you for your revision.

Back to TopTop