Next Article in Journal
Cpt1c Downregulation Causes Plasma Membrane Remodelling and Anthracycline Resistance in Breast Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
The In Vitro Impact of Isoxazole Derivatives on Pathogenic Biofilm and Cytotoxicity of Fibroblast Cell Line
Previous Article in Journal
NMR Studies of Two Lysine Based Dendrimers with Insertion of Similar Histidine-Arginine and Arginine-Histidine Spacers Having Different Properties for Application in Drug Delivery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effectiveness of Semi-Supervised Active Learning in Automated Wound Image Segmentation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Biomaterial Inks from Peptide-Functionalized Silk Fibers for 3D Printing of Futuristic Wound-Healing and Sensing Materials

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 947; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24020947
by Maria Rachele Ceccarini 1, Valentina Palazzi 2, Raffaele Salvati 2, Irene Chiesa 3, Carmelo De Maria 3, Stefania Bonafoni 2, Paolo Mezzanotte 2, Michela Codini 1, Lorenzo Pacini 4, Fosca Errante 5, Paolo Rovero 5, Antonino Morabito 6, Tommaso Beccari 1, Luca Roselli 2 and Luca Valentini 7,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 947; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24020947
Submission received: 17 December 2022 / Revised: 30 December 2022 / Accepted: 31 December 2022 / Published: 4 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Approaches for Wound Treatment)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors have investigated biomaterials inks to perform wound-healing and act as sensors. The output of the research is interesting and presented results are rigorous. However, various flaws minimize the quality of this research paper and need to be addressed. I recommend major revision of this manuscript and advise authors to review below points to enhance the quality of their manuscript before publication in International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

To address,

1) To expand your introduction, I suggest the following references (Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2102275 10.1002/advs.202102275) (Gels 20228(11), 748; 10.3390/gels8110748) (Adv. Mater. 2022, 2207617. 10.1002/adma.202207617) (J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2022, 74, 103564; 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103564).

2) The introduction should be reworked and given more details emphasizing the reason of your study.

3) The Figure 1 bottom border line seems to be cut. Please correct it.

4) Line 94, what does Line Dimensions refer at?

5) Why have you employed DMSO to conduct cytotoxic test, considering DMSO toxicity? Furthermore, the Figure 2. x axis unit does not match with the DMSO percentage concentration.

6) Why is the 60 uMol sample showing the best healing – wound closure rate, what could be the reason.

7) Authors mention about piezoresistive properties and humidity sensing performances, they could illustrate their piezoresistive and humidity sensing effect.

8) Line 482, please cross-check the title of your references and pay attention to the consistency of your references titles.

 

9) Correct English here and there

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for the revision and valuable comments.

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The proposed article covers the topic of bio inks for 3D printing and their application in wound healing and sensing materials. Introduction part gives a brief review of the current research in the area. The authors have cited satisfactory number of references that are current. I presume there was a mistake in the final editing which resulted in moving the materials and methods section after result and discussion. This should be corrected. Besides that, article is very well written and gives details in the procedure as well as the obtained results.

 

Author Response

Thank you for your revision and valuable appreciation.

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop