Next Article in Journal
Overlapping and Distinct Features of Cardiac Pathology in Inherited Human and Murine Ether Lipid Deficiency
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of IGF2R Molecular Expression in Canine Osteosarcoma as Part of a Novel Comparative Oncology Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fli1 and Tissue Fibrosis in Various Diseases

by
Elena V. Mikhailova
1,
Irina V. Romanova
1,
Alexei Y. Bagrov
2,* and
Natalia I. Agalakova
1
1
Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 44 Thorez Avenue, 194223 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
2
Padakonn Pharma, 20309 Narva, Estonia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 1881; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031881
Submission received: 26 November 2022 / Revised: 2 January 2023 / Accepted: 13 January 2023 / Published: 18 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)

Abstract

:
Being initially described as a factor of virally-induced leukemias, Fli1 (Friend leukemia integration 1) has attracted considerable interest lately due to its role in both healthy physiology and a variety of pathological conditions. Over the past few years, Fli1 has been found to be one of the crucial regulators of normal hematopoiesis, vasculogenesis, and immune response. However, abnormal expression of Fli1 due to genetic predisposition, epigenetic reprogramming (modifications), or environmental factors is associated with a few diseases of different etiology. Fli1 hyperexpression leads to malignant transformation of cells and progression of cancers such as Ewing’s sarcoma. Deficiency in Fli1 is implicated in the development of systemic sclerosis and hypertensive disorders, which are often accompanied by pronounced fibrosis in different organs. This review summarizes the initial findings and the most recent advances in defining the role of Fli1 in diseases of different origin with emphasis on its pro-fibrotic potential.

1. Introduction

Fli1 (Friend leukemia integration 1), a member of the ETS transcription factors family, was first described as a factor implicated in the etiology of virally-induced leukemia, Friend murine leukemia virus-induced erythroleukemia [1,2]. Since then, Fli1 has been shown to be highly expressed in immune cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and various cells around blood vessels and it has been recognized to exert a crucial role in a diverse array of normal biological functions including cell proliferation, growth, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis. Accordingly, Fli1 has been reported to be one of the key factors regulating tissues development and regeneration, proper organ growth, and homeostasis. In the immune system, Fli1 is involved in the functioning of immune cells by controlling their development, proliferation, activation, and migration, as well as by regulating cytokines and chemokines [3]. In hematopoietic tissues, Fli1 is one of the key regulators of proliferation of stem/progenitor cells and their differentiation into mature blood cells of different lineages [4]. In the vascular system, Fli1 controls the survival of endothelial cells and vascular development by transcriptional modulation of the expression of angiogenesis-related genes [5,6]. A great contribution to understanding the role of Fli1 for all of these vitally important functions came from investigations on genetically modified mice [7,8]. The crucial role of Fli1 in the regulation of the genes necessary for vascular remodeling and vessel maturation was confirmed by the fact that Fli1 knockout mice die during embryogenesis due to impaired hematopoiesis and the loss of vascular integrity leading to cerebral hemorrhage [7].
During angiogenesis, new vessels are formed from existing ones by budding the capillary endothelium. Fli1, being the most highly expressed transcriptional factor in endothelial cells alongside with Erg and GATA-2, regulates this process by controlling the expression of key angiogenesis factors. The expression of Fli1, as well as of Erg and ELF-1, stimulates endoglin [9]. Activated endoglin provides the responses of cells to a signal from TGF-β. Fli1/Erg, when interacting with GATA2, is also indirectly involved in the regulation of the vascular endothelial-statin/epidermal growth factor-like 7 (VE-statin/egfl7) gene [10], which is strongly and specifically expressed in embryonic and mature endothelial cells and is responsible for the proliferation of pericytes and smooth muscle cells, two key points in the stabilization of newly formed capillaries [11]. In endothelial cells, Fli1 is directly regulated by ETS-1, with both ETS genes determining the fate of cells [12].
However, dysregulated expression of Fli1 due to genetic mutations was recognized as one of the causative factors leading to malignant transformation of cells and the progression of multiple hematological and solid cancers [13], including Ewing’s sarcoma [14] and prostate cancer [15]. Moreover, over the past decades Fli1 has attracted great attention for its role in the etiology of several autoimmune diseases. Sustained Fli1 downregulation is associated with the development of systemic sclerosis, while overexpression of the FLI1 gene is a well-acknowledged event in systemic lupus erythematosus [3]. Abnormal Fli1 activity is implicated in the development of hypertensive disorders such as uremic cardiomyopathy [16] and preeclampsia [17]. Next, Fli1 deficiency was identified as an essential component of the signaling pathways underlying pro-fibrotic processes, a common phenomenon accompanying the progression of many diseases. Experiments using genetically engineered rodents, in vitro FLI1 gene silencing, dominant interference, and DNA binding mutants have indicated that Fli1 inhibition is mediated by both direct (DNA binding) and indirect (protein–protein interaction) mechanisms [8,12,18]. Over the past few years, a new trend in investigations increasingly reports the genetic predisposition and epigenetic modifications of genes related to Fli1-dependent pathologies. Besides genetics, epigenetics has been suggested as playing a pivotal role in the development and clinical manifestations of diseases [19,20,21]. Aberrant expression of Fli1 might be responsible for disturbed functioning of a series of genes including that encoding integrins, growth factor receptors, chemokines, and adhesion molecules. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the discovery and current understanding of the role of Fli1 in the progression of diseases of different nature with a particular focus on recent advances in its function associated with pro-fibrotic processes (Figure 1).

2. Diseases Associated with Fli1 Deficiency

2.1. Fli1 in Systemic Sclerosis

Fli1 as inductor of fibrosis. Systemic sclerosis (SSc or scleroderma) is a complex and highly heterogeneous autoimmune disease starting from dysregulation of the immune system and inflammation and followed by impaired angiogenesis, widespread vascular injury, and blood coagulation defects [22]. Persistently activated interstitial fibroblasts induce irreversible fibrosis of the skin and multiple internal organs. Except skin lesions, SSc is accompanied by cardiac defects (lesions in the coronary arteries, pericardium, and myocardium, and myocardial fibrosis) and renal failure (vascular lesions and fibrosis in the kidney, damage to renal glomeruli, and impaired glomerular filtration).
Although the etiology of this life-threatening disorder is not completely understood, SSc-associated vasculopathy was demonstrated to result from hyperactivation of vascular endothelial cells due to genetic or environmental factors leading to dysregulated vascular remodeling. The central mechanism underlying tissue fibrosis is excessive deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and impaired collagen homeostasis. Activated interstitial fibroblasts and immune cells synthesize excessive amounts of collagens (first of all types I, III, VI, and VII) and other ECM components such as fibronectin, tenascin-C (TNC), and alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA), profibrotic cytokines including TGF-β and connective tissue growth factor CTGF (also known as CCN2), accompanied by reduced expression of ECM-degrading enzymes MMP (matrix metalloproteinases) 1 and 3 [23,24].
The causative relationship between transcription factors from the ETS family and pro-fibrotic processes was first established in the pioneering work of Czuwara-Ladykowska et al. [25], which demonstrated that Fli1 plays a crucial role in the regulation of collagen synthesis in dermal fibroblasts by competing with Ets-1, and the ratio of Fli1 to Ets-1 in the presence of co-regulatory proteins may control collagen production. Further in vitro studies have confirmed that FLI1 suppression induces SSc-like phenotypes in dermal fibroblasts, dermal dendritic cells, keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and macrophages, while in vivo findings have established that Fli1 deficiency is an important mediator of SSc-associated fibrosis [26,27,28]. The role of Fli1 as a natural negative inhibitor of collagen genes was supported by the fact that Fli1 protein levels were inversely proportional with COL1A1 mRNA and collagen 1 levels in the dermal fibroblasts of patients with SSc and in cultured fibroblast isolated from Fli1−/−, Fli1+/−, and Fli1+/+ mice embryos [29]. In the lesional and non-lesional skin of SSc patients, Fli1-positive fibroblasts are either consistently absent or only occasionally seen, and Fli1 immunoreactivity is significantly reduced in endothelial cells [29]. Fli1 is downregulated in dermal dendritic cells [30] and in the primary skin fibroblasts of SSc patients [31]. Furthermore, Fli1 has been demonstrated to play an important role in the regulation of other ECM proteins’ synthesis, including MMP-1 and CTGF [32,33]. Fli1 deficiency impairs the expression of various genes both in fibroblasts and endothelial cells and may represent a unique pathogenetic link between dermal fibrosis and peripheral vasculopathy in SSc. The critical role of Fli1 in the development of this disease was confirmed in the works on FLI1-mutated animals such as Fli1+/− mice [8] or that with a conditional deletion of FLI1 in endothelial cells (Fli1 CKO mice) [34].
Fli1-DNA binding. Under normal physiological conditions, Fli1 and Ets-1 form DNA–protein complexes with the sequences of the COL1A2 gene promoter. The suppressive interaction of Fli1with COL1 gene is functionally enhanced by co-regulating factors such as Sp1 and Sp3 [25]. Stable FLI1 transfection leads to dramatic suppression of COL1A2 mRNA and newly synthesized collagenous proteins by inhibiting COL1A2 promoter activity, while Ets-1 activates the COL1A2 promoter, which indicates that Fli1 inhibits the COL1A2 gene by displacing Ets-1. Recent studies have suggested that Fli1 also binds to promoters of genes encoding other proteins such as CCN2 [32], pro-angiogenic adipokine chemerin involved in inflammation, angiogenesis and energy metabolism [35], and one of the damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) molecules S100A12 [36].
Fli1 signaling pathways. The transcriptional potential of Fli1 is strictly regulated by a balance between the activities of two cytokines—pro-fibrotic TGF-β, a well-established inductor of ECM proteins’ synthesis, and anti-fibrotic TNFα which prevents uncontrolled ECM production. TGF-β stimulation leads to activation of a few cellular targets (Figure 1, Table 1). Active PKC-δ is translocated to the nucleus and recruited to the COL1A2 promoter, where it directly phosphorylates Fli1 at threonine 312 [37]. Phosphorylation at this residue is necessary for interaction of Fli1 with p300/CREB-binding protein-associated factor (PCAF) resulting in acetylation of Fli1 at lysine 380 [38,39]. Acetylated Fli1 dissociates from the COL1A2 promoter and degrades, while decreased Fli1 transcription enhances the expression of COL genes. Another downstream effector of TGF-β is nonreceptor kinase c-Abl which activates the nuclear translocation of PKC-δ thus facilitating Fli1 acetylation and decreasing Fli1 repression of the COL1A2 gene [40]. Indeed, persistent stimulation of the c-Abl/PKC-δ/Fli1 cascade at least partially implicates in the fibrotic program in dermal fibroblasts obtained from patients with both SSc and its relative disease—localized scleroderma (LSc) [41]. Moreover, the c-Abl–PKC-δ–Fli1 pathway is activated by TGF-β-dependent stimulation of endothelin-1 [42].
A variety of other factors contribute to SSc due to aberrant expression of Fli1 (Table 1). Among them are cathepsins, proteolytic enzymes regulating angiogenesis and ECM degradation. Enhanced expression of endothelial cathepsin B and cathepsin L due to Fli1 deficiency has been shown to be associated with SSc vasculopathy, whereas downregulation of CTSB, CTSL, and CTSV in dermal fibroblasts implicates in SSc dermal fibrosis [43,44,45]. Next, Fli1 acts as a repressor of CTGF growth factor, an important regulator of angiogenesis, chondrogenesis, and wound healing. Downregulation of Fli1 upregulated the expression of CTGF mRNA which mimics to some extent the profibrotic effects of transforming growth factor TGF-β such as the upregulation of the COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes and the downregulation of the MMP1 gene [32]. Fli1 is a strong inhibitor of a pleiotropic growth factor progranulin (PGRN), an endogenous antagonist of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptors, and Fli1 suppression was shown to be associated with upregulated expression of PGRN and TNF-α in the skin of dsSSc patients, Fli1+/− mice, and bleomycin (BLM)-treated mice [46,47].
Besides, Fli1 was shown to regulate the activity of a few angiogenesis-related chemokines with pro- or anti-angiogenic properties in the context of SSc-associated vasculopathy. For instance, Fli1 deficiency is associated with suppression of CXCL5 in the dermal blood vessels of SSc patients, Fli1 siRNA transfected endothelial cells, and Fli1 knockout mice [48]. In contrast, the progression of vasculopathy and fibrosis in SSc heart, lung, and skin due to Fli1 deficiency in fibroblasts and endothelial cells was accompanied by upregulation of CXCL6 [49], while CXCL13 (a chemokine for B cells, follicular T cells, T helper 17 cells, and regulatory T cells) expression was enhanced by Fli1 deficiency in peritoneal murine macrophages [50]. CXCL4, a chemokine with anti-angiogenic capacity, may contribute to peripheral SSc vasculopathy by downregulating Fli1 via c-Abl signaling in endothelial cells. Furthermore, CXCL4 blocked the cell proliferation of HUVECs induced by TGF-β or platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) [51]. Using three experimental models, namely skin biopsy samples of SSc patients, cultured human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMECs), and a BLM-induced mice SSc model of skin fibrosis, Ikawa et al. [52] showed that the development of SSc vasculopathy is associated with increased expression of endothelial CCR6 due to Fli1 deficiency in dermal small vessels irrespective of disease subtypes and disease duration, while CCL20 expression was significantly elevated in dermal fibroblasts of patients with early dcSSc.
Fli1 has also been demonstrated to be implicated in the regulation of activities of a wide variety of genes involved in different aspects of cell physiology. Fli1 deletion altered the expression of the proteins involved in vascular homeostasis including VE-cadherin, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1), MMP-9, platelet-derived growth factor B (PDGFB), and S1P(1) receptor in human, Fli1+/− mice, and Fli1 CKO mice dermal microvascular endothelial cells [34]. Fli1 deficiency was suggested to contribute to the suppression of RALDH1 (aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A1) in the dermal dendritic cells (DCs) of patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc and BLM-treated Fli1+/− mice [30]. Another Fli1 target is pro-angiogenic adipokine chemerin, which is involved in inflammation, adipogenesis, angiogenesis, and energy metabolism. The silencing of Fli1, which binds to the chemerin promoter, induced chemerin expression in HDMECs, while Fli1+/− mice exhibited elevated chemerin expression in dermal blood vessels [35]. Fli1 deficiency was shown to be linked with elevated expression of calcium-binding protein S100A12 at the protein level in the epidermis of SSc-involved skin and at the mRNA level in the bulk skin [36]. Hypercoagulation conditions associated with tissue fibrosis and impaired peripheral circulation in SSc was shown to result from Fli1-dependent downregulation of endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) playing a critical role in the regulation of coagulation system and mediating various cytoprotective effects [53]. The development of SSc-associated pulmonary vascular hypertension was suggested to be linked with Fli1-deficiency-induced upregulation of adipsin, serine proteinase catalyzing the breakdown of complement factor C3 [54].
Genetic and epigenetic modulations. During the last few years, SSc development has been shown to greatly depend on the complex interaction between genetic predisposition which determines the susceptibility to SSc and epigenetic modifications which modulate the severity of disease, especially pro-fibrotic processes. FLI1 is genetically and epigenetically suppressed in SSc patients, suggesting Fli1 deficiency as an important factor in SSc etiology [19,20,21,55]. Fli1+/− mice exhibit an enhanced deposition of type I collagen in the skin and develop mild vascular lesions, while BLM-treated Fli1+/− mice develop skin fibrosis and vascular pathologies [8]. However, the exact mutations associated with SSc have virtually not been explored. The only human genetic variant found to influence Fli1 expression is the polymorphism of (GA)n (GA dinucleotide repeat sequence) microsatellites located at 5′ UTR of the FLI1 gene [56]. Patients possessing (GA)n alleles with ≥ 22 repeats exhibit decreased Fli1 mRNA levels in the peripheral blood but greater susceptibility to both diffuse cutaneous and limited cutaneous SSc in comparison to healthy controls with (GA)n alleles ≤21.
Growing evidence has suggested that not only inheritance but also epigenetic modifications can mediate the emergence and persistence of SSc phenotypes (Table 1). Fli1 was shown to be a target of all known epigenetic mechanisms, from DNA methylation and histone acetylation to non-coding RNA (microRNA and long non-coding RNA). Thus, compared with the controls, skin biopsy specimens and fibroblasts of SSc patients exhibited hypermethylation of CpG islands and reduced acetylation of histones H3 and H4 in the promoter region of the FLI1 gene, as well as significantly higher levels of DNA methyltransferase DNMT1, histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC6, proteins MBD-1 and MBD-2 (proteins containing a methyl-CpG DNA binding domain), and MeCP2 (protein of the methylated CpG binding domain) [57]. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of skin fibroblast from patients with diffuse and limited cutaneous SSc demonstrated a substantial number of hypomethylated genes relative to ECM proteins’ turnover, including a series of collagen genes (COL23A1, COL4A2, COL8A1, COL16A1, COL29A1, COL1A1, COL6A3, and COL12A1), PAX9 encoding the pro-α2 chain of type I collagen, ITGA9 encoding α integrin, TNXB encoding tenascin-XB, ADAM12 encoding metallopeptidase, and transcription factors gene RUNX1-3 [58].
Except chromatin remodeling, a variety of miRNAs regulating cell grow differentiation and immune functions have been shown to be implicated in SSc-dependent fibrotic processes. Knockdown of pro-fibrotic miR-26a, which was predicted to target the FLI1 untranslated region, increased Fli1 expression and decreased collagen I and fibronectin expression in SSc skin fibroblasts, while miR-26 transfection reduced the Fli1 level and enhanced collagen I and fibronectin accumulation [31]. The synthesis of collagen has also been shown to be regulated by a series of miRNAs with pro- or anti-fibrotic properties. Among the pro-fibrotic ones is miR-21, whose expression is upregulated in both dcSSc- and TGF-β-treated fibroblasts [59]. Anti-fibrotic miR-29a, known to bind the 3′ UTR of the COL1A1 gene, modulates collagen production in an opposing way. Its level was significantly decreased in SSc fibroblasts, SSc skin biopsies, and SSc skin samples from BLM-treated mice, while its overexpression in SSc fibroblasts suppressed collagen synthesis [59,60]. Other anti-fibrotic miRNAs, miR-196a and miR-let-7a, were found to be downregulated both in dermal fibroblasts and the skin of SSc patients thus resulting in abnormal collagen expression [61,62]. In addition, collagen production in SSc fibroblasts was enhanced by the suppression of miR-135b, while the serum and monocytes of SSc patients exhibited diminished levels of miR-135b due to methylation [63].

2.2. Fli1 in Uremic Cardiomyopathy

Uremic cardiomyopathy (UC) is a multifactorial pathological condition developed in the patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is responsible for increased rates of heart failure and high mortality, particularly sudden cardiac death [64]. It is important that the risk of developing cardiovascular defects is even higher than that of kidney failure. UC is characterized by remodeling of cardiac tissues leading to hypertrophy of left ventricle and diastolic dysfunction, and by a myriad of metabolic maladaptations in myocardial cells including disturbed mitochondrial function, changes in substrate utilization and metabolic transporter function, and altered insulin response.
The attempts to understand the cardiac perturbations accompanying CKD have revealed its link with abnormal Fli1 expression and increased collagen production as well (Figure 1). Early work has demonstrated that Fli1 transgenic mice developed a high incidence of immunological renal disease and ultimately died of renal failure caused by tubulointerstitial nephritis and immune-complex glomerulonephritis [65]. Later studies have strongly implicated the transcription factor Fli1 in the progressive cardiac fibrosis seen with experimental uremia. The works on rats that underwent partial nephrectomy have shown that many of the clinical features of experimental UC are accompanied by an increase in circulating concentrations of marinobufagenin (MBG), one of the cardiotonic steroids [66,67]. Moreover, MBG signaling through Na/K-ATPase is directly responsible for suppression of Fli1 and the stimulation of cardiac fibroblasts to produce increased amounts of collagen, thus triggering cardiac fibrosis seen with experimental renal failure [66,67]. These findings were confirmed by the fact that intraperitoneal administration of monoclonal antibodies to MBG restored Fli1 expression and reduced cardiac fibrosis [68]. Isolated cardiac fibroblasts cultured with 1 nM MBG in vitro increased procollagen-1 expression accompanied by synthesis of procollagen-1 mRNA and collagen translation [67]. The stimulation of fibroblasts with MBG was prevented by treatment with inhibitors of tyrosine phosphorylation, Src activation, EGFR transactivation, and N-acetyl cysteine. In general, the signaling pathway leading from MBG to increased collagen synthesis resembles that observed in other Fli1-deficiency-associated diseases such as SSc including translocation of PKC-δ to the nucleus where it stimulates Fli1 [16].

2.3. Fli1 in Preeclampsia

Another example of pathology at least partially associated with aberrantly low Fli1 expression and the development of vascular fibrosis is preeclampsia (PE), a hypertensive complication of pregnancy adversely affecting both mothers and newborns and in some cases leading to maternal stroke and death [17,69,70]. PE is believed to depend on pre-existing cardiovascular abnormalities and is associated with a life-long risk of hypertension and coronary artery disease [70]. Among others, SARS-CoV-2 infection has recently been suggested to be linked with higher PE incidence, most probably due to inflammatory responses which can infect the placenta and impair its normal development [71]. An important role in PE belongs to maternal and placental vascular dysfunction, in particular abnormal remodeling of spiral arteries, endothelial damage, and an imbalance between the release of pro- and antiangiogenic factors (such as vascular endothelial growth factor A VEGFA, placental growth factor PlGF, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 sFLT-1, endoglin ENG, and soluble sENG) [72].
On the other hand, the progression of PE is closely related to enhanced synthesis of MBG and the development of cardiovascular fibrosis involving Fli1-dependent mechanisms [17,69]. Clinical studies have demonstrated that in umbilical arteries and placentas obtained from PE patients, the expression of Fli1 was significantly (4–9-fold) diminished, while the levels of pro-collagen and collagen-1 increased (2.5–3-fold) [73,74,75]. Similar results were obtained in the work on pregnant Sprague Dawley rats in which PE was induced experimentally by exposure to water with excessive NaCl amounts (1.8 %). The development of a PE-like phenotype in animals was accompanied by a seven-fold decrease in Fli1 expression and a four-fold increase in collagen-1 synthesis in thoracic aortas [76]. Finally, silencing of the FLI1 gene by 24 h incubation of the isolated segment of healthy human umbilical arteries with Fli1 siRNA not only suppressed the expression of Fli1 at the protein level, but also led to pronounced elevation of pro-collagen-1 and collagen-1 levels [77].
A causative relationship between MBG and Fli1 was confirmed in experiments in vitro on explants of umbilical arteries from healthy women. Incubation of the vascular fragments with 1-10 nM MBG for 24–48 h resulted in a considerable (4-5-fold) decrease in Fli1 levels and accumulation (2–3-fold) of pro-collagen-1 and collagen-1, thus mimicking the processes typical for PE and linked with vascular fibrosis [73,74,75]. In contrast, the degree of collagen-1 accumulation was diminished after the pre-treatment of arterial rings from normotensive pregnant women with monoclonal anti-MBG antibodies [74]. Application of canrenone, an active metabolite of spironolactone used in hypertensive therapy, fully restored Fli1 expression and partially suppressed collagen-1 synthesis in umbilical arteries from PE patients and in the vessels of healthy women incubated with MBG [75]. Moreover, short-term administration of anti-MBG antibodies to rats with experimental PE reversed Fli1 inhibition, although it had no effect on collagen-1 synthesis [76]. However, the underlying molecular pathways of PE in human or rat vessels were not associated with the stimulation of TGF-β and Smad proteins (Figure 1), although the protein level of cytoplasmic PKC-δ increased.

2.4. Fli1 as a Common Causative Factor of Hypertension

Interestingly, the patients with preeclampsia [17], chronic renal failure [68,78], and type 2 diabetes [79] shared the same phenotype features, namely the development of cardiovascular fibrosis due to Fli1 deficiency. We assume that the etiology and underlying molecular mechanisms of all these disorders are common and at least in part include enhanced levels of circulating MBG and inhibition of membrane enzyme Na/K-ATPase. The phenomena of MBG-induced fibrosis are sensitive to pharmacological modulation of Na/K-ATPase activity with anti-hypertensive agents [75]. The binding of MBG to Na/K-ATPase initiates the signal transduction that complexes with Src and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that leads to translocation of PKC-δ to the nucleus and Fli1 repression [16]. However, this process does not involve TGF-β—Smad proteins cascade, although TGF-β antagonist SB-431542 suppressed the stimulation of collagen production [67]. In contrast, Dahl salt-sensitive rats [80] and normotensive salt-loaded Sprague Dawley rats [81] react to a high-salt diet with fibrotic changes in myocardial and renal tissue which are accompanied by the activation of TGF-β [81]. Although the association of MBG and TGF-β described in these experimental models is clear, the causative relationship between them in salt sensitivity has not been explored in details. Interestingly, the crosstalk between Fli1 and TGF-β profibrotic signaling via PKC-δ has previously been described, for example, in type 2 diabetes during salt loading [79]. The development of diabetes is associated with profound inhibition of Fli1 in vascular tissues, while exposure of these rats to high salt levels activates TGF-β and suppresses the expression of Fli1 [79].
Table 1. Summary of Fli1-associated pro-fibrotic effects.
Table 1. Summary of Fli1-associated pro-fibrotic effects.
ExpressionEffectExperimental SystemReferences
Fli1 repressors
TGF-βActivation of
TGF-β receptors
Human dermal fibroblasts;
rat diabetes model;
rat hypertension model
[25,29,32,38,39,79,80,81]
c-AblPKC-δ phosphorylationHuman normal and SSc dermal fibroblasts[40,41,47,51]
PKC-δFli1 phosphorylation Human normal and SSc dermal fibroblasts;
FLI1-transfected HEK293T cells;
FLI1 silencing in human UA
[37,39,42,47,77]
Endothelin-1Fli1 activationHuman normal and SSc dermal fibroblasts;
BLM-treated mice
[42]
PCAFFli1 acetylation
Human dermal fibroblasts;
FLI1-transfected HEK293T cells
[38]
CXCL4VasculopathyHUVECs[51]
MBGPKC-δ activation; Fli1 suppressionWild-type and FLI1-knockdown mice;
rat CKD model;
rat cardiac fibroblasts;
human cardiac fibroblasts;
human renal fibroblasts;
FLI1-transfected renal fibroblasts;
rat diabetes model;
rat hypertension model;
rat PE model
[16,66,67,68,73,74,75,76,77,79,80,81]
Fli1-deficiency targets
COL1Collagen synthesis
FLI1-transfected human dermal fibroblasts;
human normal and SSc dermal fibroblasts;
murine Fli11−/−, Fli1+/− and Fli1+/+ fibroblasts;
wild-type and FLI1-knockdown mice;
rat CKD model;
rat cardiac fibroblasts;
human cardiac fibroblasts;
human renal fibroblasts;
FLI1-transfected renal fibroblasts;
rat diabetes model;
rat hypertension model;
rat PE model;
human PE UA;
FLI1 silencing in human UA;
human MBG-treated UA
[8,16,25,29,32,38,66,67,68,73,74,75,76,77,79,80,81]
CTGF(CCN2)COL1A1 and COL1A2 upregulation; MMP-1 downregulationFLI1-transfected human dermal fibroblasts;
human SSc fibroblasts
[32,33]
MMP-1Increased production of EMC componentsFLI1-transfected human dermal fibroblasts;
human SSc fibroblasts
[32,33]
FibronectinFibrosisHuman CD14+ monocytes and CD14+ macrophages[23]
ChemerinImpaired angiogenesisHuman SSc dermal vessels and HDMECs;
murine Fli1+/− dermal blood vessels;
[35]
S100A12 Skin sclerosisHuman SSc skin;[36]
RALDH1FibrosisHuman dermal dendritic cells;
BLM-treated Fli1+/− mice
[30]
Cathepsin B


Vasculopathy


Increased production of EMC components
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs;
Fli1+/− mice;
human dcSSc dermal fibroblasts, early dcSSc dermal fibroblasts
[43]
Cathepsin L

Vasculopathy

Increased production of EMC components
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs;
human SS dermal vessels and skin;
FLI1-knockout mice;
skin of BLM-treated mice
[45]
Cathepsin VIncreased production of EMC componentsFLI1 silencing in HDMECs;
human dcSSc dermal fibroblasts, microvascular ECs, dcSSc and lcSSc skin keratinocytes
[44]
PGRN
Inflammation;
skin sclerosis;
fibrosis
Human SSc dermal fibroblasts;
Fli-1+/− mice;
BLM-treated mice;
human LSc skin lesions
[46,47]
TNF-α
Inflammation;
fibrosis
Human LSc skin lesions;[47]
CXCL5VasculopathyHuman dcSSc dermal blood vessels;
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs;
dermal vessels of Fli1 knockout mice
[48]
CXCL6
Tissues fibrosis;
vasculopathy
Human SSc dermal fibroblasts;
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs
[49]
CCL20FibrosisHuman early dcSSc[52]
CCL6VasculopathyHuman SSc dermal vessels;
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs
[52]
EPCR Impaired vascular homeostasisHuman SSc dermal vessels;
Fli1+/− mice;
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs
[53]
VE-cadherinImpaired vascular homeostasisMDMECs of Fli1 CKO mice;
MDMECs of Fli1+/− mice;
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs
[34]
PECAM-1Impaired vascular homeostasisMDMECs of Fli1 CKO mice;
MDMECs of Fli1+/− mice;
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs
[34]
MMP-9Impaired vascular homeostasisMDMECs of Fli1 CKO mice;
MDMECs of Fli1+/− mice;
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs
[34]
PDGF-BImpaired vascular homeostasisMDMECs of Fli1 CKO mice;
MDMECs of Fli1+/− mice;
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs
[34]
S1P1Impaired vascular homeostasisMDMECs of Fli1 CKO mice;
MDMECs of Fli1+/− mice;
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs
[34]
AdipsinVascular hypertensionHuman SSc dermal vessels;
FLI1 silencing in HDMECs
[54]
Genetic and epigenetic factors
(GA)n allelesIncreased susceptibility to SScHuman SSc peripheral blood[56]
Acetylation of histones H3 and H4 in the FLI1 gene promoterFLI1 suppression; increased collagen synthesisHuman skin, normal and dcSSc fibroblasts[57]
HDAC-1 and 6FLI1 suppressionHuman skin, normal and dcSSc fibroblasts[57]
MBD-1 and 2, MeCP2DNA methylationHuman skin, normal and dcSSc fibroblasts[57]
Methylation of CpG islands in the FLI1 promoterFLI1 suppression; increased Collagen synthesisHuman skin, normal and dcSSc fibroblasts[57]
DNMT1 FLI1 suppressionHuman skin, normal and dcSSc fibroblasts[33,57]
COL23A1, COL4A2 methylation
Increased collagen synthesisHuman dcSSc and lcSSc dermal fibroblasts [58]
ITGA9 methylation TGF-β upregulationHuman dcSSc and lcSSc dermal fibroblasts[58]
ADAM12 methylationTGF-β upregulation
Human dcSSc and lcSSc dermal fibroblasts[58]
miRNA-26aFLI1 suppressionPrimary SSc skin fibroblasts[31]
miRNA-21TGF-β upregulation;
collagen synthesis
Human dcSSc and TGF-β treated normal fibroblasts[59]
miRNA-29aTGF-β upregulation;
collagen synthesis
Human dcSSc and TGF-β treated normal fibroblasts[59]
Abbreviations. dcSSc—diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; lcSSc—limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis; LSc—localized scleroderma; CKD—chronic kidney disease; BLM—bleomycin; HDMECs—human dermal microvascular endothelial cells; HUVECs—human umbilical vein endothelial cells; MBG—marinobufagenin; PE—preeclampsia; UA—umbilical artery; CTGF (connective tissue growth factor also known as CCN2); PGRN—progranulin; EPCR—endothelial protein C receptor; DNMT1—DNA methyltransferase; MBD-1 and 2—proteins containing methyl-CpG DNA binding domain, MeCP2—protein of the methylated CpG binding domain; HDAC-1 and 6—histone deacetylases; ITGA9—integrin 9 gene.

3. Fli1 Overexpression as a Cause of Ewing’s Sarcoma

Ewing’s sarcoma (ES), belonging to the family of Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT), is a highly aggressive and very metastatic tumor arising predominantly in the bones and soft tissues of children and young adults [82,83]. The major mechanism driving ESFT development is a genetic FLI1-dependent process, but it is different from that underlying Fli1-deficiency-associated disorders. It involves a generation of oncogenic fusion protein EWS–FLI1 functioning as an aberrant transcriptional factor that dysregulates the activity of several target genes thus leading to initiation of malignant cell transformation and tumor growth [84,85]. Although the progression and onset of ES is generally not considered to be linked with fibrosis, recent studies have demonstrated an impaired regulation of ECM metabolism providing the microenvironment for growing tumors [86,87].
Oncogenic Fli1-dependent mechanisms. In the vast majority of cases, the ESFT is associated with reciprocal chromosomal translocation which fuses the N-terminal transcriptional activation domain of the Ewing’s sarcoma breakpoint region 1 (EWSR1) gene located on chromosome 22 with the C-terminal DNA binding domain of the friend leukemia virus integration 1 (FLI1) gene on chromosome 11—t(11;22) (q24;q12) [88,89]. The result of this mutation is the generation of chimeric oncogenic factor EWSR1–FLI1 with two primary domains, EWS domain being a potent translational regulator and the FLI1 domain containing a highly conserved DNA binding domain [90]. The EWS–FLI1 fusion protein possesses phase transition properties that allow it to transition into a liquid phase and interact with non-membrane organelles. A series of in vivo and in vitro studies has shown that specific EWS–FLI1 binding domains recognizes and preferentially bind to highly repetitive GGAA-containing microsatellite sequences near targeted genes to activate or repress them [91,92]. At least three consecutive GGAA motifs are necessary for EWS–FLI1 interaction and at least two distinct classes of GGAA microsatellites, “enhancer-like” and “promoter-like”, have been identified. Upon binding to otherwise non-functional GGAA microsatellite, EWS–FLI1 transforms inactive silent regions of chromatin into an accessible state, creates de novo enhancers, and transcriptionally activates oncogenic gene expression [93]. EWS/FLI1’s responsiveness to oncogenesis appears to depend on microsatellite length [91,92].
Fli1 and ECM proteins in ES. The reorganization of the ECM network associated with tumorigenesis and the progression of ES has been linked with dysregulation of various extracellular proteins, glycoproteins, and signaling molecules. Watanabe et al. [86] found that three of six ES cell lines and four of six primary tumors exhibited high expression levels of tenascin-C (TNC). In vivo assays have established that excessive TNC synthesis is the result of direct interaction of the EWS–FLI1 fusion protein with four ETS binding sites at the TNC promoter. Moreover, the levels of endogenous TNC mRNA and protein decreased following inhibition of EWS–FLI1 fusion protein expression [86]. Recently, the causative link between EWS–FLI1 oncogenic activity and the regulatory role of TNC in the growth of the extracellular matrix was confirmed by the work of He et al. [94].
A few other targets of EWS/FLI1 are involved in the disruption of ECM’s structural integrity. The work [95] has shown that the malignant transformation of NIH-3T3 cells by the EWSR1-FLI1 oncoprotein requires the enhanced activity of ERK1/ERK2 protein kinases. Recently, this ERK upregulation was linked to dysregulated catabolism of heparan sulfate proteoglycan, one of the cell surface molecules playing a crucial role in the regulation of cell differentiation, adhesion, and migration [96]. Another EWS–FLI1 effector is caveolin-1 (CAV1) which is able to induce metastasis in ES via the pathway including MEK/ERK cascade and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) [96]. Lysyl oxidase (LOX), an enzyme implicated in the proper maintenance of the structural integrity of the extracellular matrix, is not expressed in ES cells and primary tumors due to downregulation by the EWS/FLI1 oncoprotein [97]. Interestingly, a small population of ES cells undergoing phenotypic switch to a more metastatic state exhibited enhanced Wnt/β-catenin activity, which antagonizes EWS–FLI1-dependent inhibition of the TGF-βII receptor leading to increased susceptibility of cells to TGF-β ligands [98].
Fli1-dependent epigenetic modulations. Functioning as a potent oncoprotein, EWS–FLI1 not only binds to chromatin but also alters its organization, thus changing the expression of a large number of genes necessary for ES development using various epigenetic mechanisms [93,99]. These processes are carried out by enzymes affecting both DNA methylation (mainly at the sites interacting with transcription factors) and histone acetylation (resulting in unfolding of DNA which is normally tightly wrapped around histones) which makes DNA more accessible for transcription factors and, accordingly, enhances the transcription of genes in this region. The result of GGAA microsatellite binding is the recruitment of acetyltransferase p300 regulating chromatin state by acetylating H3K27 at its binding sites, and MLL (mixed-lineage leukemia) complexes that methylate H3K4 [99]. These processes loosen DNA packaging and facilitate access to the genes to initiate transcription. Later work has confirmed that aberrant expression of the EWS–FLI1 oncogene was shown to be accompanied by selective deposition of histone markers H3K4me3, H3K9ac, and H3K27ac at its promoter region [100]. One of the critical EWS–FLI1 target gene required for ES proliferation is NR0B1 (nuclear receptor subfamily 0 group B member 1) containing a GGAA-microsatellite-enriched region near the transcriptional start site and functioning as a transcriptional regulator [92]. The examples of other EWS–FLI1 oncogenic effectors are various regulatory genes encoding proteins acting at the G1 stage of the cell cycle such as cyclin G1, cyclin D1, p21, and p27 [101]. Metastatic ES spread was shown to be associated with EWS/FLI1 binding to the promoter of histone methyltransferase EZH2 (Enhancer of Zeste (Drosophila) Homolog 2) which regulates stemness genes such as the nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR) or genes involved in neuroectodermal and endothelial differentiation (EMP1, EPHB2, GFAP, and GAP43) [102]. In a human stem cell models of tumor initiation, EWS–FLI1 was suggested to increase the expression of HOX (homeobox) genes crucial for correct embryonic development, and overexpression of a few HOX genes downstream of EWS–FLI1 has been linked to loss of H3K27me3 and the gain of H3K4me3 markers at the promoters of HOX genes [103].
Moreover, the role of EWS–FLI1 in ES is not limited to transcriptional regulation, but also includes modulation of the expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs by direct inhibition. Thus, EWS–FLI1 represses the promoter activity of miRNA-145 which functions as an activator of RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs). Such inhibition leads to an increase in cell pluripotency, reduces their differentiation, and enhances carcinogenesis [104]. Another target of the EWS–FLI1 protein is the transcriptional suppressor miRNA-22, whose expression participates in the inhibition of cell proliferation programs. This leads to overexpression of the H3K9me1/2 histone demethylase KDM3A (JMJD1A/JHDM2A) and tumor growth [105]. Other direct targets of EWS–FLI1 which are constitutively repressed in ES are miRNA-214-3p and let-7a [106,107]. All of the Fli1-associated oncogenic effects are summarized in Table 2.

4. Perspectives

Analyzing the literature data collected to date, it becomes clears that aberrant expression of Fli1 is an important trigger of various life-threatening disorders. It makes this transcriptional factor an attractive target for molecular therapy. However, currently there are no therapeutic or gene engineering strategies able to directly restore the expression level of Fli1 in the cells of patients with Fli1-dependent diseases. For example, the traditional treatment of Ewing’s sarcoma is not specific and includes DNA damaging chemotherapeutic drugs such as doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide or radiation therapy (reviewed by Daley et al. [108]). Since the EWS–FLI1 fusion protein is a difficult target for therapeutic approaches due to its lack of a peculiar binding pocket for chemical agents or enzymatic activity, the search for ES treatment has been focused on alternative strategies such as inhibition of critical FLI1-interacting enzymes. One of proposed methods is the inhibition of the DNA damage response protein and transcriptional coactivator PARP1 (Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) whose expression was shown to be directly driven by the EWS–FLI1 fusion product [109]. Disrupting EWS–FLI1:PARP1’s interaction with the PARP1 inhibitor olaparib suppressed the growth of ES cells, primary mouse tumor xenografts, and tumor metastases, while tumorigenesis in an EWS–FLI1-induced ES mouse xenograft model was completely inhibited by combination of olaparib and the second-line chemotherapeutic drug temozolomide. Another potential target in ES is USP9X (ubiquitin-specific peptidase 9 X-linked) which binds to the ETS domain of EWS–FLI1 and stabilizes its protein expression (Wang, 2023) [110]. Treatment of ES cells with USP9X inhibitor WP1130 induced de-ubiquitination and depletion of EWS–FLI1 in vitro and in vivo accompanied by the reduced growth of ES cells and tumors. Erkizan et al. [111] reported a small molecule, YK-4-279, which was able to induce apoptosis and suppress the growth of ES orthotopic xenografts by blocking interaction between EWSR1–FLI1 and RNA helicase A (RHA). The first molecule believed to be a direct inhibitor of EWSR1–FLI1 is TK216, a YK-4-279 derivative, which recently entered phase II clinical trials in ES patients either as monotherapy or in combination with vincristine [112]. Recently, the gene engineering approach has led to the construction of a lentivirus that can specifically transduce ES cells and sensitize them to otherwise relatively non-toxic (Val)ganciclovir by increasing the expression of viral thymidine kinase, thus inducing a strong anti-tumorigenic effect [113].
With regard to systemic sclerosis, the therapeutic approaches targeting Fli1 are even more limited. To date, a few non-specific drugs have been tested. Thus, glycyrrhizin used for the treatment of hepatic diseases and itching dermatitis was shown to possess an anti-fibrotic effect in SSc dermal and lung fibroblasts via downregulation of Dnmt1, upregulation of Fli1, and induction of MMP1 gene expression via an ERK1/2-dependent mechanism [114]. Another compound is fluoroquinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin which was able to decrease the levels of DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1) and increase the expression of Fli1 in dermal fibroblasts obtained from SSc patients [33]. Cyclophosphamide was demonstrated to exert a beneficial effect on Fli1 deficiency-dependent vasculopathy in a murine SSc model by improving the expression of endothelial Fli1, as well as angiogenesis and vasculogenesis effectors [115]. Recently, the traditional Chinese medicine Bushen Yijing decoction (BSYJ) was proposed for SSc treatment because of its ability to exert an anti-fibrotic effect in a mouse SSc model and primary human SSc fibroblasts by suppressing miRNA-26a expression which restores Fli1 levels [31]. However, the effectiveness of these drugs is still controversial. Therefore, rational therapeutic targeting of Fli1 represents a major challenge. Further advances in the knowledge of Fli1’s key regulators and large prospective studies are urgently needed to provide a basis for the development of new treatment approaches.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.I.A. and A.Y.B.; validation, E.V.M. and I.V.R.; writing, review and editing, E.V.M., I.V.R., N.I.A. and A.Y.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was performed within the state assignment of the Federal Agency of Scientific Organizations of Russia (theme No. 075-0152-22-00).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to the subject of this article.

References

  1. Ben-David, Y.; Giddens, E.B.; Bernstein, A. Identification and mapping of a common proviral integration site Fli-1 in erythroleukemia cells induced by Friend murine leukemia virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 1332–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ben-David, Y.; Giddens, E.B.; Letwin, K.; Bernstein, A. Erythroleukemia induction by Friend murine leukemia virus: Insertional activation of a new member of the ets gene family, Fli-1, closely linked to c-ets-1. Genes Dev. 1991, 5, 908–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. He, Y.S.; Yang, X.K.; Hu, Y.Q.; Xiang, K.; Pan, H.F. Emerging role of Fli1 in autoimmune diseases. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 90, 107127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ben-David, Y.; Babu Gajendran, B.; Klarke, M.; Sample, K.M.; Zacksenhaus, E. Current insights into the role of Fli-1 in hematopoiesis and malignant transformation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2022, 79, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sato, Y. Role of ETS family transcription factors in vascular development and angiogenesis. Cell Struct. Funct. 2001, 26, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ferdous, A.; Singh, S.; Luo, Y.; Abedin, M.J.; Jiang, N.; Perry, C.E.; Evers, B.M.; Gillette, T.G.; Kyba, M.; Trojanowska, M.; et al. Fli1 Promotes Vascular Morphogenesis by Regulating Endothelial Potential of Multipotent Myogenic Progenitors. Circ. Res. 2021, 129, 949–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Spyropoulos, D.D.; Pharr, P.N.; Lavenburg, K.R.; Jackers, P.; Papas, T.S.; Ogawa, M.; Watson, D.K. Hemorrhage, impaired hematopoiesis, and lethality in mouse embryos carrying a targeted disruption of the Fli1 transcription factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 5643–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Asano, Y.J. What can we learn from Fli1-deficient mice, new animal models of systemic sclerosis? Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2018, 3, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pimanda, J.E.; Chan, W.Y.; Donaldson, I.J.; Bowen, M.; Green, A.R.; Göttgens, B. Endoglin expression in the endothelium is regulated by Fli-1, Erg, and Elf-1 acting on the promoter and a −8-kb enhancer. Blood 2006, 107, 4737–4745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Le Bras, A.; Samson, C.; Trentini, M.; Caetano, B.; Lelievre, E.; Mattot, V.; Beermann, F.; Soncin, F. VE-statin/egfl7 expression in endothelial cells is regulated by a distal enhancer and a proximal promoter under the direct control of Erg and GATA-2. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Soncin, F.; Mattot, V.; Lionneton, F.; Spruyt, N.; Lepretre, F.; Begue, A.; Stehelin, D. VE-statin, an endothelial repressor of smooth muscle cell migration. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 5700–5711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Lelièvre, E.; Lionneton, F.; Mattot, V.; Spruyt, N.; Soncin, F. Ets-1 regulates fli-1 expression in endothelial cells. Identification of ETS binding sites in the fli-1 gene promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 25143–25151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Li, L.; Yu, J.; Cheng, S.; Peng, Z.; Luo, H. Transcription factor Fli-1 as a new target for antitumor drug development. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 209 Pt A, 1155–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gargallo, P.; Yáñez, Y.; Juan, A.; Segura, V.; Balaguer, J.; Torres, B.; Oltra, S.; Castel, V.; Cañete, A. Review: Ewing Sarcoma Predisposition. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2020, 26, 2057–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Qian, C.; Li, D.; Chen, Y. ETS factors in prostate cancer. Cancer Lett. 2022, 530, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Elkareh, J.; Periyasamy, S.M.; Shidyak, A.; Vetteth, S.; Schroeder, J.; Raju, V.; Hariri, I.M.; El-Okdi, N.; Gupta, S.; Fedorova, L.; et al. Marinobufagenin induces increases in procollagen expression in a process involving protein kinase C and Fli-1: Implications for uremic cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2009, 296, F1219–F1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Agalakova, N.I.; Kolodkin, N.I.; Adair, C.D.; Trashkov, A.P.; Bagrov, A.Y. Preeclampsia: Cardiotonic Steroids, Fibrosis, Fli1 and Hint to Carcinogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Toyama, T.; Asano, Y.; Miyagawa, T.; Nakamura, K.; Hirabayashi, M.; Yamashita, T.; Saigusa, R.; Miura, S.; Ichimura, Y.; Takahashi, T.; et al. The impact of transcription factor Fli1 deficiency on the regulation of angiogenesis. Exp. Dermatol. 2017, 26, 912–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Asano, Y. Epigenetic suppression of Fli1, a potential predisposing factor in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2015, 67, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fioretto, B.S.; Rosa, I.; Romano, E.; Wang, Y.; Guiducci, S.; Zhang, G.; Manetti, M.; Matucci-Cerinic, M. The contribution of epigenetics to the pathogenesis and gender dimorphism of systemic sclerosis: A comprehensive overview. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2020, 12, 1759720X20918456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, J.; Tang, R.; Ding, K. Epigenetic Modifications in the Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2022, 15, 3155–3166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kowalska-Kępczyńska, A.J. Systemic Scleroderma-Definition, Clinical Picture and Laboratory Diagnostics. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rudnik, M.; Hukara, A.; Kocherova, I.; Jordan, S.; Schniering, J.; Milleret, V.; Ehrbar, M.; Klingel, K.; Feghali-Bostwick, C.; Distler, O.; et al. Elevated Fibronectin Levels in Profibrotic CD14+ Monocytes and CD14+ Macrophages in Systemic Sclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 642891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bhattacharyya, S.; Midwood, K.S.; Varga, J. Tenascin-C in fibrosis in multiple organs: Translational implications. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 128, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Czuwara-Ladykowska, J.; Shirasaki, F.; Jackers, P.; Watson, D.K.; Trojanowska, M.J. Fli-1 inhibits collagen type I production in dermal fibroblasts via an Sp1-dependent pathway. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 20839–20848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Manetti, M. Fli1 deficiency and beyond: A unique pathway linking peripheral vasculopathy and dermal fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Exp. Dermatol. 2015, 24, 256–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Takahashi, T.; Asano, Y.; Sugawara, K.; Yamashita, T.; Nakamura, K.; Saigusa, R.; Ichimura, Y.; Toyama, T.; Taniguchi, T.; Akamata, K.; et al. Epithelial Fli1 deficiency drives systemic autoimmunity and fibrosis: Possible roles in scleroderma. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 1129–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Asano, Y.J. The Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis: An Understanding Based on a Common Pathologic Cascade across Multiple Organs and Additional Organ-Specific Pathologies. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kubo, M.; Czuwara-Ladykowska, J.; Moussa, O.; Markiewicz, M.; Smith, E.; Silver, R.M.; Jablonska, S.; Blaszczyk, M.; Watson, D.K.; Trojanowska, M. Persistent down-regulation of Fli1, a suppressor of collagen transcription, in fibrotic scleroderma skin. Am. J. Pathol. 2003, 163, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Miura, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Saigusa, R.; Yamashita, T.; Nakamura, K.; Hirabayashi, M.; Miyagawa, T.; Yoshizaki, A.; Trojanowska, M.; Sato, S.; et al. Fli1 deficiency suppresses RALDH1 activity of dermal dendritic cells and related induction of regulatory T cells: A possible role in scleroderma. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2021, 23, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheng, Z.; Zhang, J.; Deng, W.; Lin, S.; Li, D.; Zhu, K.; Qi, Q. Bushen Yijing Decoction (BSYJ) exerts an anti-systemic sclerosis effect via regulating MicroRNA-26a/FLI1 axis. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 1212–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nakerakanti, S.S.; Kapanadze, B.; Yamasaki, M.; Markiewicz, M.; Trojanowska, M. Fli1 and Ets1 have distinct roles in connective tissue growth factor/CCN2 gene regulation and induction of the profibrotic gene program. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 25259–25269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bujor, A.M.; Haines, P.; Padilla, C.; Christmann, R.B.; Junie, M.; Sampaio-Barros, P.D.; Lafyatis, R.; Trojanowska, M. Ciprofloxacin has antifibrotic effects in scleroderma fibroblasts via downregulation of Dnmt1 and upregulation of Fli1. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2012, 30, 1473–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Asano, Y.; Stawski, L.; Hant, F.; Highland, K.; Silver, R.; Szalai, G.; Watson, D.K.; Trojanowska, M. Endothelial Fli1 deficiency impairs vascular homeostasis: A role in scleroderma vasculopathy. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 1983–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Akamata, K.; Asano, Y.; Taniguchi, T.; Yamashita, T.; Saigusa, R.; Nakamura, K.; Noda, S.; Aozasa, N.; Toyama, T.; Takahashi, T.; et al. Increased expression of chemerin in endothelial cells due to Fli1 deficiency may contribute to the development of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2015, 54, 1308–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Omatsu, J.; Saigusa, R.; Miyagawa, T.; Fukui, Y.; Toyama, S.; Awaji, K.; Ikawa, T.; Norimatsu, Y.; Yoshizaki, A.; Sato, S.; et al. Serum S100A12 levels: Possible association with skin sclerosis and interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Exp. Dermatol. 2021, 30, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jinnin, M.; Ihn, H.; Yamane, K.; Mimura, Y.; Asano, Y.; Tamaki, K. Alpha2(I) collagen gene regulation by protein kinase C signaling in human dermal fibroblasts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 1337–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Asano, Y.; Czuwara, J.; Trojanowska, M. Transforming growth factor-beta regulates DNA binding activity of transcription factor Fli1 by p300/CREB-binding protein-associated factor-dependent acetylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 34672–34683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Asano, Y.; Trojanowska, M. Phosphorylation of Fli1 at threonine 312 by protein kinase C delta promotes its interaction with p300⁄CREB-binding protein-associated factor and subsequent acetylation in response to transforming growth factor beta. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 1882–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bujor, A.M.; Asano, Y.; Haines, P.; Lafyatis, R.; Trojanowska, M. The c-Abl tyrosine kinase controls protein kinase Cδ-induced Fli-1 phosphorylation in human dermal fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 1729–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Noda, S.; Asano, Y.; Akamata, K.; Aozasa, N.; Taniguchi, T.; Takahashi, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Toyama, T.; Sumida, H.; Yanaba, K.; et al. Constitutive activation of c-Abl/protein kinase C-δ/Fli1 pathway in dermal fibroblasts derived from patients with localized scleroderma. Br. J. Dermatol. 2012, 167, 1098–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Akamata, K.; Asano, Y.; Aozasa, N.; Noda, S.; Taniguchi, T.; Takahashi, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Toyama, T.; Sato, S. Bosentan reverses the pro-fibrotic phenotype of systemic sclerosis dermal fibroblasts via increasing DNA binding ability of transcription factor Fli1. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16, R86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Noda, S.; Asano, Y.; Akamata, K.; Aozasa, N.; Taniguchi, T.; Takahashi, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Toyama, T.; Sumida, H.; Yanaba, K.; et al. A possible contribution of altered cathepsin B expression to the development of skin sclerosis and vasculopathy in systemic sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Noda, S.; Asano, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Akamata, K.; Aozasa, N.; Taniguchi, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Toyama, T.; Sumida, H.; Kuwano, Y.; et al. Decreased cathepsin V expression due to Fli1 deficiency contributes to the development of dermal fibrosis and proliferative vasculopathy in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2013, 52, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Yamashita, T.; Asano, Y.; Taniguchi, T.; Nakamura, K.; Saigusa, R.; Takahashi, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Toyama, T.; Yoshizaki, A.; Miyagaki, T.; et al. A potential contribution of altered cathepsin L expression to the development of dermal fibrosis and vasculopathy in systemic sclerosis. Exp. Dermatol. 2016, 25, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ichimura, Y.; Asano, Y.; Akamata, K.; Noda, S.; Taniguchi, T.; Takahashi, T.; Toyama, T.; Tada, Y.; Sugaya, M.; Sato, S.; et al. Progranulin Overproduction Due to Fli-1 Deficiency Contributes to the Resistance of Dermal Fibroblasts to Tumor Necrosis Factor in Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015, 67, 3245–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Miyagawa, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Hirabayashi, M.; Yamashita, T.; Saigusa, R.; Miura, S.; Takahashi, T.; Toyama, T.; Taniguchi, T.; et al. Progranulin overproduction due to constitutively activated c-Abl/PKC-δ/Fli1 pathway contributes to the resistance of dermal fibroblasts to the anti-fibrotic effect of tumor necrosis factor-α in localized scleroderma. Dermatol. Sci. 2018, 92, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ichimura, Y.; Asano, Y.; Akamata, K.; Takahashi, T.; Noda, S.; Taniguchi, T.; Toyama, T.; Aozasa, N.; Sumida, H.; Kuwano, Y.; et al. Fli1 deficiency contributes to the suppression of endothelial CXCL5 expression in systemic sclerosis. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2014, 306, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Taniguchi, T.; Asano, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Yamashita, T.; Saigusa, R.; Ichimura, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Toyama, T.; Yoshizaki, A.; Sato, S. Fli1 Deficiency Induces CXCL6 Expression in Dermal Fibroblasts and Endothelial Cells, Contributing to the Development of Fibrosis and Vasculopathy in Systemic Sclerosis. J. Rheumatol. 2017, 44, 1198–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Taniguchi, T.; Miyagawa, T.; Toyama, S.; Yamashita, T.; Nakamura, K.; Saigusa, R.; Ichimura, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Toyama, T.; Yoshizaki, A.; et al. CXCL13 produced by macrophages due to Fli1 deficiency may contribute to the development of tissue fibrosis, vasculopathy and immune activation in systemic sclerosis. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jiang, Z.; Chen, C.; Yang, S.; He, H.; Zhu, X.; Liang, M. Contribution to the peripheral vasculopathy and endothelial cell dysfunction by CXCL4 in Systemic Sclerosis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2021, 104, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ikawa, T.; Miyagawa, T.; Fukui, Y.; Toyama, S.; Omatsu, J.; Awaji, K.; Norimatsu, Y.; Watanabe, Y.; Yoshizaki, A.; Sato, S.; et al. Endothelial CCR6 expression due to FLI1 deficiency contributes to vasculopathy associated with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2021, 23, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Saigusa, R.; Asano, Y.; Yamashita, T.; Taniguchi, T.; Takahashi, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Toyama, T.; Yoshizaki, A.; Miyagaki, T.; Sugaya, M.; et al. Fli1 deficiency contributes to the downregulation of endothelial protein C receptor in systemic sclerosis: A possible role in prothrombotic conditions. Br. J. Dermatol. 2016, 174, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Miyagawa, T.; Taniguchi, T.; Saigusa, R.; Fukayama, M.; Takahashi, T.; Yamashita, T.; Hirabayashi, M.; Miura, S.; Nakamura, K.; Yoshizaki, A.; et al. Fli1 deficiency induces endothelial adipsin expression, contributing to the onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2020, 59, 2005–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mayes, M.D.; Trojanowska, M. Genetic factors in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2007, 9, S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Yamashita, K.; Kawasaki, A.; Matsushita, T.; Furukawa, H.; Kondo, Y.; Okiyama, N.; Nagaoka, S.; Shimada, K.; Sugii, S.; Katayama, M.; et al. Association of functional (GA)n microsatellite polymorphism in the FLI1 gene with susceptibility to human systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2020, 59, 3553–3562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, Y.; Fan, P.S.; Kahaleh, B. Association between enhanced type I collagen expression and epigenetic repression of the FLI1 gene in scleroderma fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 2271–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Altorok, N.; Tsou, P.S.; Coit, P.; Khanna, D.; Sawalha, A.H. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis in dermal fibroblasts from patients with diffuse and limited systemic sclerosis reveals common and subset-specific DNA methylation aberrancies. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 1612–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jafarinejad-Farsangi, S.; Gharibdoost, F.; Farazmand, A.; Kavosi, H.; Jamshidi, A.; Karimizadeh, E.; Noorbakhsh, F.; Mahmoudi, M. MicroRNA-21 and microRNA-29a modulate the expression of collagen in dermal fibroblasts of patients with systemic sclerosis. Autoimmunity 2019, 52, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Maurer, B.; Stanczyk, J.; Jüngel, A.; Akhmetshina, A.; Trenkmann, M.; Brock, M.; Kowal-Bielecka, O.; Gay, R.E.; Michel, B.A.; Distler, J.H.; et al. MicroRNA-29, a key regulator of collagen expression in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 62, 1733–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Makino, K.; Jinnin, M.; Hirano, A.; Yamane, K.; Eto, M.; Kusano, T.; Honda, N.; Kajihara, I.; Makino, T.; Sakai, K.; et al. The downregulation of miR-let-7a contributes to the excessive expression of type I collagen in systemic and localized scleroderma. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 3905–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Makino, T.; Jinnin, M.; Etoh, M.; Yamane, K.; Kajihara, I.; IMakino, H.; Ichihara, A.; Igata, T.; Sakai, K.; Fukushima, S.; et al. Downregulation of microRNA-196a in the sera and involved skin of localized scleroderma patients. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2014, 24, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. O’Reilly, S.; Ciechomska, M.; Fullard, N.; Przyborski, S.; van Laar, J.M. IL-13 mediates collagen deposition via STAT6 and microRNA-135b: A role for epigenetics. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Garikapati, K.; Goh, D.; Khanna, S.; Echampati, K. Uraemic Cardiomyopathy: A Review of Current Literature. Clin. Med. Insights Cardiol. 2021, 15, 1179546821998347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, L.; Eddy, A.; Teng, Y.T.; Fritzler, M.; Kluppel, M.; Melet, F.; Bernstein, A. An immunological renal disease in transgenic mice that overexpress Fli-1, a member of the ets family of transcription factor genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15, 6961–6970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Kennedy, D.J.; Vetteth, S.; Periyasamy, S.M.; Kanj, M.; Fedorova, L.; Khouri, S.; Kahaleh, M.B.; Xie, Z.; Malhotra, D.; Kolodkin, N.I.; et al. Central role for the cardiotonic steroid marinobufagenin in the pathogenesis of experimental uremic cardiomyopathy. Hypertension 2006, 47, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Elkareh, J.; Kennedy, D.J.; Yashaswi, B.; Vetteth, S.; Shidyak, A.; Kim, E.G.; Smaili, S.; Periyasamy, S.M.; Hariri, I.M.; Fedorova, L.; et al. Marinobufagenin stimulates fibroblast collagen production and causes fibrosis in experimental uremic cardiomyopathy. Hypertension 2007, 49, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Haller, S.T.; Kennedy, D.J.; Shidyak, A.; Budny, G.V.; Malhotra, D.; Fedorova, O.V.; Shapiro, J.I.; Bagrov, A.Y. Monoclonal antibody against marinobufagenin reverses cardiac fibrosis in rats with chronic renal failure. Am. J. Hypertens. 2012, 25, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Reznik, V.A.; Kashkin, V.A.; Agalakova, N.I.; Adair, C.D.; Bagrov, A.Y. Endogenous Bufadienolides, Fibrosis and Preeclampsia. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2019, 2019, 5019287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Dennehy, N.; Lees, C. Preeclampsia: Maternal cardiovascular function and optimising outcomes. Early Hum. Dev. 2022, 174, 105669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tossetta, G.; Fantone, S.; Muti, N.D.; Balercia, G.; Ciavattini, A.; Giannubilo, S.R.; Marzioni, D. Preeclampsia and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: A systematic review. J. Hypertens. 2022, 40, 629–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Opichka, M.A.; Rappelt, M.W.; Gutterman, D.D.; Grobe, J.L.; McIntosh, J.J. Vascular Dysfunction in Preeclampsia. Cells 2021, 10, 3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nikitina, E.R.; Mikhailov, A.V.; Nikandrova, E.S.; Frolova, E.V.; Fadeev, A.V.; Shman, V.V.; Shilova, V.Y.; Tapilskaya, N.I.; Shapiro, J.I.; Fedorova, O.V.; et al. In preeclampsia endogenous cardiotonic steroids induce vascular fibrosis and impair relaxation of umbilical arteries. J. Hypertens. 2011, 29, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Fedorova, O.V.; Ishkaraeva, V.V.; Grigorova, Y.N.; Reznik, V.A.; Kolodkin, N.I.; Zazerskaya, I.E.; Zernetkina, V.; Agalakova, N.I.; Tapilskaya, N.I.; Adair, C.D.; et al. Antibody to Marinobufagenin Reverses Placenta-Induced Fibrosis of Umbilical Arteries in Preeclampsia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Agalakova, N.I.; Grigorova, Y.N.; Ershov, I.A.; Reznik, V.A.; Mikhailova, E.V.; Nadei, O.V.; Samuilovskaya, L.; Romanova, L.A.; Adair, C.D.; Romanova, I.V.; et al. Canrenone Restores Vasorelaxation Impaired by Marinobufagenin in Human Preeclampsia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Agalakova, N.I.; Reznik, V.A.; Nadei, O.V.; Ershov, I.A.; Rassokha, O.S.; Vasyutina, M.L.; Ivanov, D.O.; Adair, C.D.; Galagudza, M.M.; Bagrov, A.Y. Antibody against Na/K-ATPase Inhibitor Lowers Blood Pressure and Increases Vascular Fli1 in Experimental Preeclampsia. Am. J. Hypertens. 2020, 33, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Agalakova, N.I.; Reznik, V.A.; Ershov, I.A.; Lupanova, E.A.; Nadei, O.V.; Ivanov, D.O.; Adair, C.D.; Bagrov, A.Y. Silencing of Fli1 Gene Mimics Effects of Preeclampsia and Induces Collagen Synthesis in Human Umbilical Arteries. Am. J. Hypertens. 2022, 35, 828–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kolmakova, E.V.; Haller, S.T.; Kennedy, D.J.; Isachkina, A.N.; Budny, G.V.; Frolova, E.V.; Nikitina, E.R.; Piecha, G.; Malhotra, D.; Fedorova, O.V.; et al. Endogenous cardiotonic steroids in chronic renal failure. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2011, 26, 2912–2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Fedorova, O.V.; Fadeev, A.V.; Grigorova, Y.N.; Agalakova, N.I.; Konradi, A.O.; Bagrov, A.Y. Marinobufagenin induces vascular fibrosis via a pressure-independent mechanism in NaCl-loaded diabetic rats. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2019, 74, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, Y.; Wei, W.; Shilova, V.; Petrashevskaya, N.N.; Zernetkina, V.I.; Grigorova, Y.N.; Marshall, C.A.; Fenner, R.C.; Lehrmann, E.; Wood, W.H., III; et al. Monoclonal Antibody to Marinobufagenin Downregulates TGFβ Profibrotic Signaling in Left Ventricle and Kidney and Reduces Tissue Remodeling in Salt-Sensitive Hypertension. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019, 8, e012138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Grigorova, Y.N.; Juhasz, O.; Zernetkina, V.; Fishbein, K.W.; Fedorova, O.V.; Bagrov, A.Y. Monoclonal antibody to an endogenous sodium pump inhibitor marinobufagenin reverses aortic remodeling and stiffness in normotensive rats on a high salt intake. Am. J. Hypertens. 2016, 29, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Grünewald, T.G.P.; Cidre-Aranaz, F.; Surdez, D.; Tomazou, E.M.; de Álava, E.; Kovar, H.; Sorensen, P.H.; Delattre, O.; Dirksen, U. Ewing sarcoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Riggi, N.; Suvà, M.L.; Stamenkovic, I. Ewing’s Sarcoma. N. Eng. J. Med. 2021, 384, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Uren, A.; Toretsky, J.A. Ewing’s sarcoma oncoprotein EWS-FLI1: The perfect target without a therapeutic agent. Future Oncol. 2005, 1, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ban, J.; Siligan, C.; Kreppel, M.; Aryee, D.; Kovar, H. EWS-FLI1 in Ewing’s sarcoma: Real targets and collateral damage. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2006, 587, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Watanabe, G.; Nishimori, H.; Irifune, H.; Sasaki, Y.; Ishida, S.; Zembutsu, H.; Tanaka, T.; Kawaguchi, S.; Wada, T.; Hata, J.; et al. Induction of tenascin-C by tumor-specific EWS-ETS fusion genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2003, 36, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Vasileva, E.; Warren, M.; Triche, T.J.; Amatruda, J.F. Dysregulated heparan sulfate proteoglycan metabolism promotes Ewing sarcoma tumor growth. eLife 2022, 11, e69734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bailly, R.A.; Bosselut, R.; Zucman, J.; Cormier, F.; Delattre, O.; Roussel, M.; Thomas, G.; Ghysdael, J. DNA-binding and transcriptional activation properties of the EWS-FLI-1 fusion protein resulting from the t(11;22) translocation in Ewing sarcoma. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14, 3230–3241. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Lessnick, S.L.; Braun, B.S.; Denny, C.T.; May, W.A. Multiple domains mediate transformation by the Ewing’s sarcoma EWS/FLI-1 fusion gene. Oncogene 1995, 10, 423–431. [Google Scholar]
  90. Goldman, L.; Cecil, R.L.; Schafer, A.I. Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed.; Elsevier Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  91. Johnson, K.M.; Taslim, C.; Saund, R.S.; Lessnick, S.L. Identification of two types of GGAA-microsatellites and their roles in EWS/FLI binding and gene regulation in Ewing sarcoma. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Johnson, K.M.; Mahler, N.R.; Saund, R.S.; Theisen, E.R.; Taslim, C.; Callender, N.W.; Crow, J.C.; Miller, K.R.; Lessnick, S.L. Role for the EWS domain of EWS/FLI in binding GGAA-microsatellites required for Ewing sarcoma anchorage independent growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 2017, 114, 9870–9875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Li, M.; Chen, C.W. Epigenetic and Transcriptional Signaling in Ewing Sarcoma-Disease Etiology and Therapeutic Opportunities. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. He, S.; Huang, Q.; Hu, J.; Li, L.; Xiao, Y.; Yu, H.; Han, Z.; Wang, T.; Zhou, W.; Wei, H.; et al. EWS-FLI1-mediated tenascin-C expression promotes tumor progression by targeting MALAT1 through integrin α5β1-mediated YAP activation in Ewing sarcoma. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 121, 922–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Silvany, R.E.; Eliazer, S.; Wolff, N.C.; Ilaria, R.L. Interference with the constitutive activation of ERK1 and ERK2 impairs EWS/FLI-1-dependent transformation. Oncogene 2000, 19, 4523–4530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Lagares-Tena, L.; García-Monclús, S.; López-Alemany, R.; Almacellas-Rabaiget, O.; Huertas-Martínez, J.; Sáinz-Jaspeado, M.; Mateo-Lozano, S.; Rodríguez-Galindo, C.; Rello-Varona, S.; Herrero-Martín, D.; et al. Caveolin-1 promotes Ewing sarcoma metastasis regulating MMP-9 expression through MAPK/ERK pathway. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 56889–56903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Agra, N.; Cidre, F.; García-García, L.; de la Parra, J.; Alonso, J. Lysyl oxidase is downregulated by the EWS/FLI1 oncoprotein and its propeptide domain displays tumor suppressor activities in Ewing sarcoma cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Hawkins, A.G.; Pedersen, E.A.; Treichel, S.; Temprine, K.; Sperring, C.; Read, J.A.; Magnuson, B.; Chugh, R.; Lawlor, E.R. Wnt/β-catenin-activated Ewing sarcoma cells promote the angiogenic switch. JCI Insight 2020, 5, e135188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Riggi, N.; Knoechel, B.; Gillespie, S.M.; Rheinbay, E.; Boulay, G.; Suvà, M.L.; Rossetti, N.E.; Boonseng, W.E.; Oksuz, O.; Cook, E.B.; et al. EWS-FLI1 utilizes divergent chromatin remodeling mechanisms to directly activate or repress enhancer elements in Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 668–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Montoya, C.; Rey, L.; Rodríguez, J.; Fernández, M.J.; Troncoso, D.; Cañas, A.; Moreno, O.; Henríquez, B.; Rojas, A. Epigenetic control of the EWS-FLI1 promoter in Ewing’s sarcoma. Oncol. Rep. 2020, 43, 1199–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Matsumoto, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Nakatani, F.; Matsunobu, T.; Matsuda, S.; Iwamoto, Y. Downregulation and forced expression of EWS-Fli1 fusion gene results in changes in the expression of G(1)regulatory genes. Br. J. Cancer 2001, 84, 768–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Richter, G.H.; Plehm, S.; Fasan, A.; Rossler, S.; Unland, R.; Bennani-Baiti, I.M.; Hotfilder, M.; Lowel, D.; von Luettichau, I.; Mossbrugger, I.; et al. EZH2 is a mediator of EWS/FLI1 driven tumor growth and metastasis blocking endothelial and neuro-ectodermal differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5324–5329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Svoboda, L.K.; Harris, A.; Bailey, N.J.; Schwentner, R.; Tomazou, E.; von Levetzow, C.; Magnuson, B.; Ljungman, M.; Kovar, H.; Lawlor, E.R. Overexpression of HOX genes is prevalent in Ewing sarcoma and is associated with altered epigenetic regulation of developmental transcription programs. Epigenetics 2014, 12, 1613–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Riggi, N.; Suvà, M.L.; De Vito, C.; Provero, P.; Stehle, J.C.; Baumer, K.; Cironi, L.; Janiszewska, M.; Petricevic, T.; Suvà, D.; et al. EWS-FLI-1 modulates miRNA145 and SOX2 expression to initiate mesenchymal stem cell reprogramming toward Ewing sarcoma cancer stem cells. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 916–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Parrish, J.K.; Sechler, M.; Winn, R.A.; Jedlicka, P. The histone demethylase KDM3A is a microRNA-22-regulated tumor promoter in Ewing Sarcoma. Oncogene 2015, 34, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. De Feo, A.; Pazzaglia, L.; Ciuffarin, L.; Mangiagli, F.; Pasello, M.; Simonetti, E.; Pellegrini, E.; Ferrari, C.; Bianchi, G.; Spazzoli, B.; et al. miR-214-3p is commonly downregulated by EWS-FLI1 and by CD99 and its restoration limits Ewing sarcoma aggressiveness. Cancers 2022, 14, 1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. De Vito, C.; Riggi, N.; Suvà, M.L.; Janiszewska, M.; Horlbeck, J.; Baumer, K.; Provero, P.; Stamenkovic, I. Let-7a is a direct EWS-FLI-1 target implicated in Ewing’s sarcoma development. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Daley, J.D.; Olson, A.C.; Bailey, K.M. Harnessing immunomodulation during DNA damage in Ewing sarcoma. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 1048705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Brenner, J.C.; Feng, F.Y.; Han, S.; Patel, S.; Goyal, S.V.; Bou-Maroun, L.M.; Liu, M.; Lonigro, R.; Prensner, J.R.; Tomlins, S.A.; et al. PARP-1 inhibition as a targeted strategy to treat Ewing’s sarcoma. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 1608–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Wang, S.; Huo, X.; Yang, Y.; Mo, Y.; Kollipara, R.K.; Kittler, R. Ablation of EWS-FLI1 by USP9X inhibition suppresses cancer cell growth in Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Lett. 2023, 552, 215984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Erkizan, H.V.; Kong, Y.; Merchant, M.; Schlottmann, S.; Barber-Rotenberg, J.S.; Yuan, L.; Abaan, O.D.; Chou, T.H.; Dakshanamurthy, S.; Brown, M.L.; et al. A small molecule blocking oncogenic protein EWS-FLI1 interaction with RNA helicase A inhibits growth of Ewing’s sarcoma. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 750–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Ludwig, J.A.; Federman, N.C.; Anderson, P.M.; Macy, M.E.; Riedel, R.F.; Davis, L.E.; Daw, N.C.; Wulff, J.; Kim, A.; Ratan, R.; et al. TK216 for relapsed/refractory Ewing sarcoma: Interim phase 1/2 results. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 11500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hölting, T.L.B.; Cidre-Aranaz, F.; Matzek, D.; Popper, B.; Jacobi, S.J.; Funk, C.M.; Geyer, F.H.; Li, J.; Piseddu, I.; Cadilha, B.L.; et al. Neomorphic DNA-binding enables tumor-specific therapeutic gene expression in fusion-addicted childhood sarcoma. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Yamashita, T.; Asano, Y.; Taniguchi, T.; Nakamura, K.; Saigusa, R.; Miura, S.; Toyama, T.; Takahashi, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Yoshizaki, A.; et al. Glycyrrhizin Ameliorates Fibrosis, Vasculopathy, and Inflammation in Animal Models of Systemic Sclerosis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Yamashita, T.; Asano, Y.; Saigusa, R.; Taniguchi, T.; Hirabayashi, M.; Miyagawa, T.; Nakamura, K.; Miura, S.; Yoshizaki, A.; Trojanowska, M.; et al. Cyclophosphamide Pulse Therapy Normalizes Vascular Abnormalities in a Mouse Model of Systemic Sclerosis Vasculopathy. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 1150–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A simplified scheme of the Fli1-dependent pro-fibrotic pathways described for different diseases. One of the pathways is induced by interaction of active TGF-β with its plasma membrane receptor and depends on the ratio between the COL1-suppressive activity of Fli1 and the stimulatory ability of Smad3. TGF-β-dependent activation leads to phosphorylation of c-Abl which in turn induces nuclear translocation of PKC-δ. In the nucleus, PKC-δ phosphorylates Fli1 at threonine 312 thus facilitating the acetylation of Fli1 at lysine 380 by PCAF (p300/CREB-binding protein-associated factor). These events result in dissociation of Fli1 from promoter of the COL1A2 gene and its rapid proteolysis, followed by increased transcription of the COL1 gene. On the other hand, activation of TGF-β receptor phosphorylates Smad3 which moves into the nucleus and undergoes acetylation by the p300/CREB-binding protein which increases its DNA binding capacity with the promoter of the COL1A2 gene. The second pathway is triggered by binding of MBG to the plasma membrane Na-K-ATPase, which results in phosphorylation of tyrosine kinase Src followed by sequential phosphorylation/stimulation of PLC and PKC-δ. Active PKC-δ is translocated to the nucleus where it disrupts Fli1 repression of the COL1 gene leading to the loss of Fli1 activity and excessive collagen synthesis.
Figure 1. A simplified scheme of the Fli1-dependent pro-fibrotic pathways described for different diseases. One of the pathways is induced by interaction of active TGF-β with its plasma membrane receptor and depends on the ratio between the COL1-suppressive activity of Fli1 and the stimulatory ability of Smad3. TGF-β-dependent activation leads to phosphorylation of c-Abl which in turn induces nuclear translocation of PKC-δ. In the nucleus, PKC-δ phosphorylates Fli1 at threonine 312 thus facilitating the acetylation of Fli1 at lysine 380 by PCAF (p300/CREB-binding protein-associated factor). These events result in dissociation of Fli1 from promoter of the COL1A2 gene and its rapid proteolysis, followed by increased transcription of the COL1 gene. On the other hand, activation of TGF-β receptor phosphorylates Smad3 which moves into the nucleus and undergoes acetylation by the p300/CREB-binding protein which increases its DNA binding capacity with the promoter of the COL1A2 gene. The second pathway is triggered by binding of MBG to the plasma membrane Na-K-ATPase, which results in phosphorylation of tyrosine kinase Src followed by sequential phosphorylation/stimulation of PLC and PKC-δ. Active PKC-δ is translocated to the nucleus where it disrupts Fli1 repression of the COL1 gene leading to the loss of Fli1 activity and excessive collagen synthesis.
Ijms 24 01881 g001
Table 2. Fli1-associated oncogenic effects.
Table 2. Fli1-associated oncogenic effects.
ExpressionEffectExperimental SystemReferences
Tenascin-C (TNC)ECM growthFLI1 transfection of human fibrosarcoma HT-1080 cells;
human primary ES tumors;
TNC-knockout cell lines;
murine xenografts
[86,87,94]
ERK1/2 protein kinasesTumor growth;
metastases;
dysregulation of
EMC metabolism
NIH-3T3 cells;

human ES cell lines
[87,95]
Caveolin-1 (CAV1)Tumor growth;
metastases;
Human ES cell lines;
CAV1 silencing;
murine xenografts
[96]
MMP-9Tumor growth;
metastases; dysregulation of
EMC metabolism
Human ES cell lines;
CAV1 silencing;
murine xenografts
[96]
LOXTumorigenesisHuman ES cell lines;
murine xenografts
[97]
Wnt/β-catenin/TGF-β/SMADAltered synthesis of ECM proteins;
promotion of angiogenesis in local TME
Human ES cells;
HUVECs;
FLI1 knockdown
[98]
DNA methylationTumorigenesisHuman ES cell lines;
primary pediatric MSC;
FLI1 knockdown;
in vivo tumorigenesis
[99]
Histone acetylation, H3K4Me3, H3K9ac, H3K27ac markers at the FLI1 promoterFLI1 transcriptional activation; tumorigenesisHuman ES cell lines;
primary pediatric MSC;
primary tumor cells;
FLI1 knockdown;
in vivo tumorigenesis
[99,100]
Acetyltransferase p300TumorigenesisHuman ES cell lines;
primary pediatric MSC;
FLI1 knockdown;
in vivo tumorigenesis
[99]
Cyclin G1, Cyclin D1TumorigenesisHuman SK-N-MC and PNKT-1 cell lines;
murine xenografts;
FLI1 transfected NIH3T3 cell
[101]
NR0B1Increased ES susceptibilityES A673 and HEK 293EBNA cell lines;
FLI1 knockdown
[92]
Histone methyltransferase EZH2Tumor development;
metastases growth
ES and neuroblastoma cell lines; murine xenografts;
RNA interference; FLI1 transfection
[102]
HOX genesAberrant differentiation; tumorigenesisES cell lines; HeLa, neuroblastoma, HEK293FT, NCSC, BM-MSCs; FLI1 transduction of NCSC[103]
miRNA-145TumorigenesishpMSCs; MSC; ES cell lines; mouse xenografts[104]
miRNA-22Tumor growthES A673 cells; miRNA-22 overexpression;
murine xenografts
[105]
miRNA-214-3pTumor growthES cell lines; human BM-MSCs; human ES primary tumors and metastases; FLI1 silencing[106]
miRNA-let-7gTumorigenesisMSCs; ES cell lines; murine xenografts; FLI1 knockdown[107]
Abbreviations: MSC—mesenchymal stem cells; BM—bone marrow; NCSC—neural crest stem cells; hpMCS—human pediatric MSC.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mikhailova, E.V.; Romanova, I.V.; Bagrov, A.Y.; Agalakova, N.I. Fli1 and Tissue Fibrosis in Various Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031881

AMA Style

Mikhailova EV, Romanova IV, Bagrov AY, Agalakova NI. Fli1 and Tissue Fibrosis in Various Diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(3):1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031881

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mikhailova, Elena V., Irina V. Romanova, Alexei Y. Bagrov, and Natalia I. Agalakova. 2023. "Fli1 and Tissue Fibrosis in Various Diseases" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 3: 1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031881

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop