Next Article in Journal
A MYB Transcription Factor Atlas Provides Insights into the Evolution of Environmental Adaptations in Plants
Next Article in Special Issue
PTCHD1 Binds Cholesterol but Not Sonic Hedgehog, Suggesting a Distinct Cellular Function
Previous Article in Journal
Hereditary Hyperferritinemia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Insight into the Role of Squalene Epoxidase (SQLE) Gene in Determining Milk Production Traits in Buffalo
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Investigation of Glucose–Water Mixtures as a Function of Concentration and Temperature by Infrared Spectroscopy

by
Maria Teresa Caccamo
1,2,* and
Salvatore Magazù
1,2
1
Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche e Informatiche, Scienze Fisiche e Scienze della Terra, Università di Messina, Viale F.S. D’Alcontres, 31, 98166 Messina, Italy
2
Consorzio Interuniversitario Scienze Fisiche Applicate (CISFA), Viale F.S. D’Alcontres, 31, 98166 Messina, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 2564; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032564
Submission received: 31 December 2022 / Revised: 25 January 2023 / Accepted: 28 January 2023 / Published: 29 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in “Molecular Biology”)

Abstract

:
The main aim of the present paper is to characterize the hydration properties of glucose and the hydrogen bond network in glucose–water mixtures. For these purposes, temperature scans on ten concentration values of glucose–water mixtures were performed by means of Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) spectroscopy. More specifically, in order to get this information an analysis of the intramolecular OH stretching mode, investigating the 3000–3700 cm−1 spectral range, was performed by means of an innovative approach based on the evaluation of the Spectral Distance (SD). The adopted procedure allows evaluating the glucose hydration number as well as characterizing the temperature behavior of the hydrogen bond network in the glucose–water mixtures. The obtained results for the hydration number are in excellent agreement with literature data and suggest the existence of a particular concentration value for which the hydrogen bond network shows a maximum strength.

1. Introduction

Glucose is an aldohexose, the main representative of oses (sugars), and it is also known as dextrose in its crystallized form. By convention, it is symbolized by Glc. It comes in the form of a white powder, with a sweet taste, and caramelizes at about 150 °C. It is soluble in water, ethanol and pyridine but insoluble in diethyl ether and many other organic solvents. In 1838, a committee of the Academy of Sciences decided to call the sugar present in grapes, in starch and in honey ‘glucose’, after the Greek term ‘gleukos’, which means sweet wine [1,2]. Émile Littré furnished another etymology with the adjective glukus (sweet taste), with two upsilons (Greek i), and the usual prefix became glyc, as in glycemia, glycogen, etc. It is a carbohydrate compound, consisting of six carbon atoms and an aldehyde group, referred to as aldohexose; it is an isomer of other sugars, in particular of mannose or fructose, with the formula C6H12O6 [3,4].
Water is one of the most abundant and essential molecules for life on Earth. About 60–70% of the human body is made up of water. Without it, life, as we know, would simply not exist. One of the important properties of water is that it is made up of polar molecules: the hydrogen and oxygen contained in water molecules (H2O) form polar covalent bonds. Water has many essential functions; in particular it is nourishment for all living beings because, for example, it is the building material of cells and a means of transporting carbohydrates and proteins to all parts of the body [5,6,7].
Figure 1 reports some properties of pure glucose and water together with their molecular structure.
In the present paper we report the findings of an experimental study on the interaction mechanisms between glucose and water, with a specific focus on the hydration properties of glucose and on the hydrogen bond network in the glucose-water mixtures [8,9,10,11,12,13]. The study was carried out by means of infrared spectroscopy measurements performed in the middle infrared region, which covers the spectral range from 400 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1. This powerful and sensitive spectroscopic technique is essentially based on the molecular absorption of radiation in the infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum and in the conversion of the absorption into molecular vibration, the absorption corresponding to the bonds present in the molecule [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
Concerning the employed analysis methods, to get information on the hydrogen bond network of water molecules around the glucose molecule as well as to characterize the hydrogen bond network in the glucose-water mixtures, an innovative approach, based on the evaluation of the Spectral Distance, has been utilized [22,23,24].
The major goal of the present study is to establish a procedure for analyzing spectra of material systems composed of many components. In particular, due to the multicomponent nature of the investigated systems, a spectral analysis on the whole MID-Infrared region was performed, focusing on the spectral feature changes.
We analyzed the pure systems and ten concentration values for the glucose–water mixtures and ten different temperature values in the range of 20–50 °C for all the glucose–water mixtures values, focusing on the intramolecular OH stretching contribution, which encompasses the spectral range of 3000–3700 cm−1.

2. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 reports, as an example, the intramolecular OH stretching band intensity of the registered FTIR spectra, in the range 3000–3700 cm−1, for the concentration of 90% of glucose and 10% water, as a function of temperature in the range 20–50 °C.
Figure 3 reports the intramolecular OH stretching band intensity of the registered FTIR spectra, for the concentration of 50% glucose and 50% water, as a function of temperature.
As can be seen, these IR spectral contributions show relatively small differences with temperature but dramatically change in shape when the concentration value is changed.
In order to better evidence the spectral changes when the intensive parameter concentration varies, Figure 4 reports the FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band, confined to the 3000–3700 cm−1 spectral range, as a function of concentration for the glucose-water mixtures at the temperature value of T = 20 °C.
The behaviour of the spectra profiles as a function of concentration shows that, starting from pure glucose and adding water, the shape spectral features show a clear transition around a concentration value corresponding to 50% glucose and 50% water.
In order to show that the same behaviour is also present at the other investigated temperatures, as an example, Figure 5a reports the registered FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band intensities, as a function of concentration at the temperature value of T = 35 °C while Figure 5b shows the registered FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band intensities, as a function of concentration at the temperature value of T = 50 °C.
As can be seen, the behaviour of the spectra profiles as a function of concentration shows that, independently of temperature, starting from pure glucose and adding water, the shape spectral features show a clear transition around a concentration value corresponding to 50% glucose and 50% water. Such a result reveals that the hydrogen bond network of the glucose–water mixture induces strong hydrogen bonds and influences the tetrahedral structure of the water molecules.
In order to extract quantitative information, an approach based on the Spectral Distance (SD) evaluation was employed.
More specifically, first we calculated the values of SD as a function of temperature, taking as reference the spectra registered at the lowest temperatures by means of Equation (1):
S D T = I ω , T I ( ω , T r ) 2 · Δ ω
where I ω , T is the intensity at the frequency ω and at a given temperature value T , I ω , T r is the intensity at the frequency ω and at a reference temperature value T r , that in our case is T r = 20 °C, and Δω is the instrument frequency resolution. This procedure is revealed to be effective when, due to the overlapping of the vibrational modes it is difficult to assign the single spectral contributions.
Figure 6 reports a comparison between the values of SD calculated for the concentration value corresponding to 90% glucose and 10% water and for the concentration value corresponding to 50% glucose and 50% water. In the same figure, the fit results obtained by means of Equation (2) are reported; in particular, T 0 is the temperature inflection point and A T is the relaxation amplitude of the curve whose inverse value is connected to the system thermal restraint; B T represents the sigmoid steepness, and C T D T T is a linear fitting contribution [25,26,27]:
S D ( T ) = A T 1 1 1 + e B T ( T T 0 ) + ( C T D T T )
From this analysis it emerges that for the concentration of 50% glucose and 50% water one registers a temperature inflection point at a value of T 0 = 33.06 °C with a value of amplitude A T equal to 0.00118, which are higher in respect to the values registered for the concentration of 90% glucose and 10% water, the values of which are T 0 = 25.97 °C and A T = 0.00375.
Such results show that at the concentration of 50% glucose and 50% water, the bond hydrogen network is stronger in respect to that corresponding to the concentration of 90% glucose and 10% water.
Concerning the spectra behavior as a function of the concentration, for evaluating the spectral distance, i.e., the SD, we used the following expression:
S D C = I ω , c I ( ω , c r ) 2 · Δ ω
in this case, I ( ω , c ) represents the intensity at the frequency ω at the concentration c while I ω , c r   represents   the   intensity   at   the   frequency   ω   at   a   reference   concentration   c r   =   10 % .
Figure 7 reports, as an example, the values of SD calculated, by means of Equation (3), for the temperature value of T = 35 °C. In this case as well, once the SD values were obtained, we used Equation (4) for fitting the evaluated SD data:
S D ( c ) = A c ( 1 1 1 + e B c ( c c 0 ) ) + ( C c D c c )
where c 0 is the concentration value corresponding to the inflection point, A c is the relaxation amplitude of the curve whose inverse value is connected to the system thermal restraint, B c represents the sigmoid steepness, and C c D c T is a linear fitting contribution.
From the data fitting procedure, we obtained a concentration transition value at c = 47.49 for T = 35 °C.
The behavior of the SD values as a function of concentration confirms that, independently of temperature, starting from pure glucose and adding water, the shape spectral features show a clear transition around a concentration value corresponding to 50% glucose and 50% water. Such a result reveals that the hydrogen bond network of the glucose–water mixture induces strong hydrogen bonds and influences the tetrahedral structure of water molecules [28,29,30,31,32,33].
It is well known that one way to deconvolve the intramolecular OH stretching contribution into sub-bands makes reference to a partition of all the existing O-H bonds into O-H bonds belonging to tetrahedral or “open” arrangements and O-H bonds belonging to non-tetrahedral or “closed” arrangements. On these grounds, the registered shape transition of the intramolecular OH contribution by increasing the water content signals that the water molecules, at low water content, bind themselves to glucose, and hence contribute to the closed OH stretching sub-band, while, after reaching its full hydration, giving rise to water tetrahedral arrangements and so contributing to the open OH stretching sub-band [34,35].
In particular, at the concentration value corresponding to 50% glucose and 50% water, the bond hydrogen network is stronger in respect to all the other investigated concentration values and is less sensitive to temperature changes. These results furnish a glucose-hydration number value of 5 and suggest that at such a concentration value the glucose–water systems constitute more stable dynamical structures.

3. Materials and Methods

D(+)-glucose monohydrate and distilled water were purchased from Aldrich-Chemie. Infrared data were collected in the temperature range of 20–50 °C; the investigated concentration values, expressed as weight fractions, i.e., (grams of Glc)/(grams of Glc + grams of H2O) were: 0.0; 0.10; 0.20; 0.30; 0.40; 0.50; 0.60; 0.70; 0.80; 0.90. The samples were prepared using a magnetic stirrer.
The FTIR absorption spectra were acquired by means of a Vertex 70 V spectrometer from Bruker Optics using a Platinum diamond ATR, in which the infrared light passes through a crystal of diamond, and then through the sample, which is pressed onto this crystal. The spectra were collected in the middle spectral range of 400–4000 cm−1; the total data points in the specific spectral regions were 1866. Each spectrum was averaged over 64 scans to achieve an acceptable S/N ratio. Before proceeding to the interpretation of the obtained spectra, data pre-processing was applied employing using the Bruker OPUS/Mentor software and the MATLAB environment.

4. Conclusions

In this work the results obtained by means of FTIR spectroscopy measurements carried out as a function of temperature for ten concentration values of glucose–water mixtures are presented. More specifically, an analysis of the intramolecular OH stretching mode, investigating the 3000–3700 cm−1 spectral range, was performed by means of an approach based on the evaluation of the SD. The adopted procedure allowed us to evaluate a hydration number for glucose of five and to characterize the temperature behavior of the hydrogen bond network in the glucose–water mixtures. The obtained results for the hydration number are in excellent agreement with literature data and suggest the existence of a particular concentration value, corresponding to 50% glucose and 50% water, for which the hydrogen bond network shows a maximum strength.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.C. and S.M.; methodology, M.T.C. and S.M.; software, M.T.C. and S.M.; validation, M.T.C. and S.M.; formal analysis, M.T.C. and S.M.; investigation, M.T.C. and S.M.; data curation, M.T.C. and S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.C. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, M.T.C. and S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kohlmeier, M. Glucose. In Food Science and Technology, Nutrient Metabolism; Kohlmeier, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003; pp. 193–210. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tonova, K.; Lazarova, M.; Dencheva-Zarkova, M.; Paniovska, S.; Tsibranska, I.; Stanoev, V.; Dzhonova, D.; Genova, J. Separation of glucose, other reducing sugars and phenolics from natural extract by nanofiltration: Effect of pressure and cross-flow velocity. Chem. Eng. Res. Design 2020, 162, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mitchell, H.H.; Hamilton, T.S.; Steggerda, F.R.; Bean, H.W. The chemical composition of the adult human body and its bearing on the biochemistry of growth. J. Biol. Chem. 1945, 158, 625–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Andary, J.; Maalouly, J.; Ouaini, R.; Chebib, H.; Rutledge, D.N.; Ouaini, N. Stability study of furans, glucose and xylose under overliming conditions: Effect of sugar degradation products. Biores. Technol. Rep. 2021, 15, 100722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Feng, P. The energy spectrum of vibration of molecules in water and its properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2014, 195, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Ninno, A.; Castellano, A.C. Co-ordination of water molecules in isotopic mixtures. J. Mol. Struc. 2011, 1006, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rondonuwu, F.; Setiawan, A.; Muninggar, J.; Karwur, F. Glucose-water interactions at increasing concentrations and temperatures as revealed by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. IOP Conf. Ser. Mat. Sci. Eng. 2020, 959, 012003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jung, Y.; Hwang, J. Near-infrared studies of glucose and sucrose in aqueous solutions: Water displacement effect and red shift in water absorption from water-solute interaction. Appl. Spectrosc. 2013, 67, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cui, X.; Wensheng, C.; Xueguang, S. Glucose induced variation of water structure by temperature dependent near infrared spectra. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 105729–105736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Elliott, G.D.; Wang, S.; Fuller, B.J. Cryoprotectants: A review of the actions and applications of cryoprotective solutes that modulate cell recovery from ultra-low temperatures. Cryobiology 2017, 76, 74–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ball, P. Water as an Active Constituent in Cell Biology. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 74–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Magazù, S.; Migliardo, P.; Musolino, A.M.; Sciortino, M.T. α, α-trehalose-water solutions. 1. Hydration phenomena and anomalies in the acoustic properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 2348–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gallina, M.E.; Sassi, P.; Paolantoni, M.; Morresi, A.; Cataliotti, R.S. Vibrational Analysis of Molecular Interactions in Aqueous Glucose Solutions. Temperature and Concentration Effects. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 8856–8864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Song, Y.C. Hydrogen Bonding Analysis of Hydroxyl Groups in Glucose Aqueous Solutions by a Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study. Bull. Kor. Chem. Soc. 2012, 33, 2238–2246. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, M.; Cui, X.; Cai, W.; Shao, X. Temperature-dependent near-infrared spectroscopy for studying the interactions in protein aqueous solutions. NIR News 2019, 30, 15–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Song, C.; Fan, W.H.; Ding, L.; Chen, X.; Chen, Z.Y.; Wang, K. Terahertz and infrared characteristic absorption spectra of aqueous glucose and fructose solutions. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Haas, J.; Mizaikoff, B. Advances in Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis. Ann. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2016, 12, 45–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Medhat, I.; Mousa, A.; Hanan, E.; Aned, L. Analysis of the Structure and Vibrational Spectra of Glucose and Fructose. Eclet. Quim. 2006, 31, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bureau, S.; Ruiz, D.; Reich, M.; Gouble, B.; Bertrand, D.; Audergon, J.M.; Renard, C. Application of ATR-FTIR for a rapid and simultaneous determination of sugars and organic acids in apricot fruit. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 1133–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. King, J.M.; Eigenmann, C.A.; Colagiuri, S. Effect of ambient temperature and humidity on performance of blood glucose meters. Diabet Med. 1995, 12, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jensen, P.S.; Bak, J.; Andersson-Engels, S. Influence of Temperature on Water and Aqueous Glucose Absorption Spectra in the Near- and Mid-Infrared Regions at Physiologically Relevant Temperatures. Appl. Spectr. 2003, 57, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Deborah, H.; Richard, N.; Hardeberg, J.Y. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Spectral Distance Functions and Metrics for Hyperspectral Image Processing. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2015, 8, 3224–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lavine, B.; Almirall, J.; Muehlethaler, C.; Neumann, C.; Workman, J. Criteria for comparing infrared spectra—A review of the forensic and analytical chemistry literature. Foren. Chem. 2020, 18, 100224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shah, N.K.; Gemperline, P.J. Combination of the Mahalanobis distance and residual variance pattern recognition techniques for classification of near-infrared reflectance spectra. Analyt. Chem. 1990, 62, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Magazù, S.; Migliardo, F.; Benedetto, A.; Calabrò, E.; La Torre, R.; Caccamo, M.T. Bioprotective effects of sucrose and trehalose on proteins. In Sucrose: Properties, Biosynthesis and Health Implications; Magazù, S., Ed.; Nova Science Publisher: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 35–46. [Google Scholar]
  26. Caccamo, M.T.; Gugliandolo, C.; Zammuto, V.; Magazù, S. Thermal properties of an exopolysaccharide produced by a marine thermotolerant Bacillus licheniformis by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 145, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Faraone, A.; Magazù, S.; Maisano, G.; Ponterio, R.C.; Villari, V. Experimental Evidence of Slow Dynamics in Semidilute Polymer Solutions. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Caccamo, M.T.; Magazù, S. Thermal restraint on PEG-EG mixtures by FTIR investigations and wavelet cross-correlation analysis. Polym. Test. 2017, 62, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Caccamo, M.T.; Cannuli, A.; Calabrò, E.; Magazù, S. Acoustic Levitator Power Device: Study of Ethylene-Glycol Water Mixtures. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. ACPEE 2017, 199, 012119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Fenimore, P.; Frauenfelder, H.; Magazù, S.; McMahon, B.; Mezei, F.; Migliardo, F.; Young, R.; Stroe, I. Concepts and problems in protein dynamics. Chem. Phys. 2013, 424, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Caccamo, M.T.; Cannuli, A. PEG acoustic levitation treatment for historic wood preservation investigated by means of FTIR spectroscopy and wavelets. Curr. Chem Biol. 2019, 13, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Magazù, S.; Calabrò, E.; Caccamo, M.T. Experimental study of thermal restraint in bio-protectant disaccharides by FTIR spectroscopy. Open Biotech. 2018, 12, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Caccamo, M.T.; Magazù, S. Multiscaling wavelet analysis of infrared and Raman data on polyethylene glycol 1000 aqueous solutions. Spectr. Lett. 2017, 50, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Caccamo, M.T.; Mavilia, G.; Mavilia, L.; Lombardo, D.; Magazù, S. Self-assembly Processes in Hydrated Montmorillonite by FTIR Investigations. Materials 2020, 13, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kovács, F.; Yan, H.; Li, H.; Kunsági-Máté, S. Temperature-Induced Change of Water Structure in Aqueous Solutions of Some Kosmotropic and Chaotropic Salts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Properties of pure glucose and pure water together with their molecular structures.
Figure 1. Properties of pure glucose and pure water together with their molecular structures.
Ijms 24 02564 g001
Figure 2. FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band intensity for the concentration value of 90% glucose and 10% water, as a function of temperature.
Figure 2. FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band intensity for the concentration value of 90% glucose and 10% water, as a function of temperature.
Ijms 24 02564 g002
Figure 3. FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band for the concentration value of 50% glucose and 50% water, as a function of temperature.
Figure 3. FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band for the concentration value of 50% glucose and 50% water, as a function of temperature.
Ijms 24 02564 g003
Figure 4. FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band as a function of concentration for glucose-water mixtures at the temperature value of T = 20 °C.
Figure 4. FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band as a function of concentration for glucose-water mixtures at the temperature value of T = 20 °C.
Ijms 24 02564 g004
Figure 5. (a) Registered FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band intensities, as a function of concentration at the temperature value of T = 35 °C; (b) Registered FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band intensities, as a function of concentration at the temperature value of T = 50 °C.
Figure 5. (a) Registered FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band intensities, as a function of concentration at the temperature value of T = 35 °C; (b) Registered FTIR intramolecular OH stretching band intensities, as a function of concentration at the temperature value of T = 50 °C.
Ijms 24 02564 g005
Figure 6. Values of SD calculated for the concentration of 90% glucose and 10% water (black square) together with the model fit (red curve) and values of SD calculated for the concentration of 50% glucose and 10% water (blue circle) together with the model fit (green curve).
Figure 6. Values of SD calculated for the concentration of 90% glucose and 10% water (black square) together with the model fit (red curve) and values of SD calculated for the concentration of 50% glucose and 10% water (blue circle) together with the model fit (green curve).
Ijms 24 02564 g006
Figure 7. SD values calculated for T = 35 °C (blue circles) together with the fitting curve, i.e., green curve.
Figure 7. SD values calculated for T = 35 °C (blue circles) together with the fitting curve, i.e., green curve.
Ijms 24 02564 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Caccamo, M.T.; Magazù, S. Investigation of Glucose–Water Mixtures as a Function of Concentration and Temperature by Infrared Spectroscopy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032564

AMA Style

Caccamo MT, Magazù S. Investigation of Glucose–Water Mixtures as a Function of Concentration and Temperature by Infrared Spectroscopy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(3):2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032564

Chicago/Turabian Style

Caccamo, Maria Teresa, and Salvatore Magazù. 2023. "Investigation of Glucose–Water Mixtures as a Function of Concentration and Temperature by Infrared Spectroscopy" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 3: 2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032564

APA Style

Caccamo, M. T., & Magazù, S. (2023). Investigation of Glucose–Water Mixtures as a Function of Concentration and Temperature by Infrared Spectroscopy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(3), 2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032564

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop