Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Use and Molecular Aspects of Ivabradine in Cardiac Remodeling: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Potential Novel Role of Membrane-Associated Carbonic Anhydrases in the Kidney
Previous Article in Journal
Therapeutic Advances in Diabetic Kidney Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
α-CAs from Photosynthetic Organisms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms24032802
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis, Biological and In Silico Studies of Griseofulvin and Usnic Acid Sulfonamide Derivatives as Fungal, Bacterial and Human Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors

by
Andrea Angeli
1,2,
Anthi Petrou
3,
Victor Kartsev
4,
Boris Lichitsky
5,
Andrey Komogortsev
5,
Clemente Capasso
2,
Athina Geronikaki
3,* and
Claudiu T. Supuran
1,*
1
NeuroFarba Department, Sezione di ScienzeFarmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Via Ugo Schiff 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
2
Istituto di Bioscienze e Biorisorse, CNR (National Research Council), Via Pietro Castellino 111, 80131 Napoli, Italy
3
Department of Pharmacy, School of Health, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
4
InterBioScreen, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia
5
Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Leninsky Prospect, Moscow 119991, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 2802; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032802
Submission received: 20 December 2022 / Revised: 27 January 2023 / Accepted: 29 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbonic Anhydrase and Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1) catalyze the essential reaction of CO2 hydration in all living organisms, being actively involved in the regulation of a plethora of patho-/physiological conditions. A series of griseofulvin and usnic acid sulfonamides were synthesized and tested as possible CA inhibitors. Since β- and γ- classes are expressed in microorganisms in addition to the α- class, showing substantial structural differences to the human isoforms they are also interesting as new antiinfective targets with a different mechanism of action for fighting the emerging problem of extensive drug resistance afflicting most countries worldwide. Griseofulvin and usnic acid sulfonamides were synthesized using methods of organic chemistry. Their inhibitory activity, assessed against the cytosolic human isoforms hCA I and hCA II, the transmembrane hCA IX as well as β- and γ-CAs from different bacterial and fungal strains, was evaluated by a stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay. Several of the investigated derivatives showed interesting inhibition activity towards the cytosolic associate isoforms hCA I and hCA II, as well as the three γ-CAs and Malassezia globosa (MgCA) enzyme. Six compounds (1b–1d, 1h, 1i and 1j) were more potent than AAZ against hCA I while five (1d, 1h, 1i, 1j and 4a) showed better activity than AAZ against the hCA II isoform. Moreover, all compounds appeared to be very potent against MgCA with a Ki lower than that of the reference drug. Furthermore, computational procedures were used to investigate the binding mode of this class of compounds within the active site of human CAs.

1. Introduction

Carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1) are a group of metalloenzymes implicated in pH buffering of extra- and intracellular spaces by catalyzing the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide (a cellular waste product) to bicarbonate and a proton [1,2,3,4]. This family of enzymes to date, is divided in eight independent gene families (i.e., α, β, γ, δ, ζ, η, θ and ι-classes) Among the 15 known humans (h) CA isoforms belonging to class α, the cytosolic isoforms hCA I and hCA II are omnipresent in the body and represent the targets for anticonvulsant, diuretic, and anti-glaucoma drugs. On the other hand, the transmembrane isoforms hCA IX and XII are linked with some types of cancers as they are overexpressed by tumor hypoxia, and have become a good target for anti-cancer drug design. Moreover, a sulfonamide derivative called SLC-0111, a selective CA IX/XII inhibitor is in Phase II clinical trials for the treatment of primary tumors/metastases, which overexpress these enzymes [5].
CA inhibitors (CAIs) targeting mammalian CAs, are used as diuretics, antiglaucoma, antiepileptic, or antiobesity agents for decades [4,6,7,8]. These diverse applications are due to the different distribution of the 15 different hCA isoforms and being involved in critical physiological and pathological processes [9,10,11,12]. On the other hand, abnormal levels or activities of these enzymes have been often related to various human diseases some of which have been clinically exploited and validated as therapeutic targets for the treatment or prevention of different pathologies such as glaucoma, neurological disorders, epilepsy and more recently in cancer [13]. In this context, many efforts are made to discover novel and selective Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors (CAIs) leading compounds with potential biomedical applications [14].
In this context, many efforts are made to discover novel and selective Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors (CAIs) lead compounds with potential biomedical applications without the side effects that are present in marketed drugs to date [14].
Griseofulvin and usnic acid derivatives attracted the attention of the scientific community due to their wide range of biological activities, such as antimicrobial [15,16,17,18], anticancer [19,20], antiviral [21,22,23] hypoglycemic [24], cytotoxic [18], anticholinergic [25], antioxidant [25], anti-Toxoplasma gondii [26]. Furthermore, it should be mentioned the important role of sulfonamide derivatives. The variety of their biological activities is very wide. They possess antimicrobial [27,28,29], anticancer [30,31,32], anti-inflammatory [33,34], antioxidant [35], antidiabetic [36,37], antimalarial [31,38], dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitory [39], and CA inhibitory [40,41,42] activities. Moreover, they play a significant role in CA inhibition, since the sulfonamide group acts as an efficient zinc-binding moiety [43].
There are many drugs on the market incorporating a sulfonamide moiety. Some examples are: the antibiotics sulfamethoxazole (used as cotrimoxazole in combination with trimethoprim), chlortalidone a thiazide-like diuretic, tolbutamide –potassium channel blocker used as oral hypoglycemic medication, zonisamide, a drug for the treatment of epilepsy and Parkinson disease, as well as acetazolamide, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, topiramate, a sulfamate drug used also to treat epilepsy and migraine, dichlorophenamide, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor used to treat acute angle closure glaucoma, dorzolamide, used to treat high pressure inside the eye, including in cases of glaucoma, and many others [44], (Figure 1).
Previously, we published an article [16,17] on the antimicrobial activity of new derivatives of griseofulvin and usnic acid. According to PASS prediction [45] these derivatives showed carbonic anhydrise inhibitory activity with Pa up to 0.646 and 0.572 for antibacterial and antifungal activities, respectively. On the other hand, as already mentioned above, the sulfonamide fragment is part of a large number of antibiotic drugs, as well as in the composition of many molecules that are carbonic anhydrase inhibitors [40,41,42,43]. The idea of choosing derivatives of griseofulvin and usnic acid containing sulfonamide fragments is based on the so-called search on hybrid molecules containing simultaneously modified natural backbone and sulfonamide moiety with potential properties as specific carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and antibiotic targets. Consequently, herein we present the synthesis of griseofulvin and usnic acid sulfonamide derivatives (1a–j,4a,b) and the evaluation of their inhibitory activity against three human CAs (I, II, IX) as well as β and γ CA from different bacterial and one fungal strains.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Preliminary Docking Studies

Computational methods are an important part of the drug design process and they are presently used to get a deeper understanding of the drug-enzyme interactions. Molecular docking studies were performed in a series of designed griseofulvin and usinc aisid derivatives bearing sulfamoyl moiety. As presented in Table S1 from all compounds only the ones highlighted in red exhibited good to excellent binding energy and were selected for further studies.

2.2. Prediction of Toxicity

Predicting the toxicity of a compound is a critical step in the development of new drug candidates, making in silico toxicity studies a faster and cheaper procedure than in vivo animal toxicity testing or in vitro testing in cell lines. It also helps significantly reduce the number of animals used in experimental assays. There are several online programs that access toxicities that use in silico models to predict mean lethal dose, carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and more.
The Pro-Tox II web server [46] predicts the mean lethal dose (LD50) in rodents. According to this program, all compounds can be classified into six GHS (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals) Categories [47] according to their toxicity and LD50 value.
Toxicity classes are defined according to the globally harmonized system of classification of labeling of chemicals (GHS). LD50 values are given in [mg/kg]:
  • ▪ Class I: fatal if swallowed (LD50 ≤ 5)
  • ▪ Class II: fatal if swallowed (5 < LD50 ≤ 50)
  • ▪ Class III: toxic if swallowed (50 < LD50 ≤ 300)
  • ▪ Class IV: harmful if swallowed (300 < LD50 ≤ 2000)
  • ▪ Class V: may be harmful if swallowed (2000 < LD50 ≤ 5000)
  • ▪ Class VI: non-toxic (LD50 > 5000)
According to prediction, the compounds found to be at category IV and V with LD50 ranging from 838 to 5000 mg/kg. All compounds were predicted to be non-cytotoxic, non-carcinogenic, non-hepatotoxic, and non-mutagenic Especially compounds 4a and 4b predicted as the most non-toxic of all with the best-predicted profile (Table S2).

2.3. Chemistry

Griseofulvin derivatives 1a–d were obtained by the reaction of griseofulvic acid 2 and corresponding amine in refluxing acetic acid. The starting material griseofulvic acid 2 was synthesized from griseofulvin by known procedures [48]. This method allows one to prepare the target products 1a–d in 42–66% yields (Scheme 1).
The griseofulvin derivatives 1e,f was synthesized by condensation of griseofulvic acid 2 with the corresponding amine. Excess triethyl orthoformate was used as solvent wherein the final products were obtained in 47–51% yields (Scheme 2).
The griseofulvin amide derivatives 1g–j were synthesized from corresponding esters 3. Starting griseofulvic esters 3 were prepared via a multicomponent reaction of griseofulvic acid, aldehydes, and Meldrum’s acid using a previously described protocol [22]. The obtained products were synthesized in 68–86% yields (Scheme 3). Note that starting compounds 3 and target amides 1g–j exist as a mixture of diastereomers.
The usnic acid derivatives 4a,b were obtained by the previously described method from (R)-usnic acid 5 and appropriate amines in refluxing ethanol [17]. The yields of synthesized products were 54–67% (Scheme 4).
The structure of all compounds (Table 1) was characterized by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and elemental analysis and presented in the experimental part.

2.4. Evaluation of CA Inhibitory Activity

All compounds 1a–j, 4a,b were evaluated for their inhibitory activity against three human CA isoforms, namely: hCA I, hCA II, hCA IX, and CAs from some bacterial and fungal pathogenic species, such as Malassezia globosa (β-CA from a fungus involved in dandruff formation [49]), MgCA, as well as β- and γ-CAs from the following bacteria: Porphyromonas gingivalis (PgiCA); Streptococcus mutans (SmuCA); Burkholderia pseudomallei (BpsCA) and Colwellia psychrerythraea, a non-pathogenic Antarctic bacterium (CpsCA) [50,51,52,53,54]. The results are shown in Table 2. The evaluation revealed that all compounds exhibited carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity against all isoforms tested, but with different ranges of inhibition constants. For example, in the case of hCA I the Ki value of tested compounds arethe in range from 15.3 to 2986 nM, while for hCA II and hCA IX the Ki ranged from 4.9 to 4052 nm and 22.5 to 709 nm, respectively. According to the data in Table 2 it is obvious that tested compounds are more potent against the hCA I isoform, with seven out of twelve compounds being more active inhibitors than acetazolamide, used as a reference drug. The compound’s order of activity can be presented as follows: 1i > 1j > 1d > 1h > 1c > 4b > 1b > 1e > 1f > 4a > 1a > 1g. The highest activity was achieved by compound 1i with Ki value of 15.3 nM compared with AAZ (Ki = 250 nM). The lowest activity was observed for compound 1g with a Ki value of 2986 nM.
As far as the inhibitory activity of compounds against the hCAII isoform is concerned five compounds (1d, 1h, 1i, 1j, and 4a) appeared to be more potent than the reference drug. According to the activity order of compounds against hCA II which is: 1d > 1j > 1h > 4a> 1c > 1b > 1f > 1e> 4b > 1g demonstrating compound 1d is the most active with Ki 4.9 nM and a selectivity index (SI) towards hCA I and hCA IX of 5.88 and 6.00 respectively. On the other hand, derivative 1g showed the lowest activity with a Ki of 4052 nM. It should be mentioned that the most selective derivative among all compounds tested was 4a with a SI towards hCA I and hCA IX of 43.9 and 7.96, respectively.
Regarding the inhibition activity against the hCA IX isoform, in general, all compounds showing moderate to low activity in the following order: 1j > 1i > 1e > 1d > 1f > 1a > 4a > 1h > 1c > 1b > 4b > 1g. Thus, the most potent appeared to be compound 1j with Ki of 22.5 nM, followed by 1i (Ki of 23.3 nM), while the lowest activity was observed for compound 1g with Ki of 709.6 nM. The comparison of the activity towards three human CA isoforms revealed that compounds 1d, 1i, and 1j were among the most active against all isoforms, whereas compound 1g showed the lowest activity in all cases.
The study of structure-activity relationships revealed that the presence of (4-(methylthio)phenyl)-N-(4-sulfamoylphenethyl)propionamide (1i) in position 3 of griseofulvin seems to be beneficial for hCA I inhibitory activity. Replacement of N-(4-sulfamoylphenethyl)acetamide (1i) by N-(2-oxo-2-((4-sulfamoylphenyl)amino) ethyl)propionamide resulted in a compound 1j with decreased activity. The introduction of 4-amino-3-hydroxybenzenesulfonamide group instead of 2-acetamido-N-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)acetamide in position 4 of griseofulvin led to less potent compound 1d, while the presence of N-(4-sulfamoylbenzyl)propionamide in position 3 of griseofulvin (1h) decreased more the activity compared to compound 1d. Nevertheless, all these compounds were among the most active ones. On the other hand, the replacement 4-methylthiophenyl group by 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl (9) was detrimental to hCA I inhibition.
Regarding the structure-activity relationships in the case of the hCA II isoform, despite the first four the most active compounds, as already mentioned being the same, the influence of substituent’s is different. Thus, the presence of 4-amino-3-hydroxybenzenesulfonamide in position 4 of the main core of compound (1d) was favorable for hCA II inhibitory activity, while the introduction of (4-(methylthio)phenyl)-N-(4-sulfamoylphenethyl)propionamide to position 3 of griseofulvin core led to compound 1i, which exhibited the lowest activity among the four (1d, 1h, 1i, 1j) most active ones. The presence of N-(2-oxo-2-((4-sulfamoylphenyl)amino)ethyl)propionamide (1j) showed the same influence on activity as in the case of hCA I, being the second active one, while replacement of 4-methylthiophenyl group by 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl (1g) in position 3 of griseofulvin moiety was detrimental as in case of hCA I.
According to a structure-activity relationship study for the hCA IX isoform the presence of N-(2-oxo-2-((4-sulfamoylphenyl)amino)ethyl)propionamide (1j) had a very positive influence on inhibitory activity, while its replacement by 4-(methylthio)phenyl)-N-(4-sulfamoylphenethyl)propionamide led to second more active compound (1i). Introduction at position 3 of the main core of compound 4-((vinylamino)methyl)benzenesulfonamide substituent resulted in less active compound (1e), while the presence of 4-amino-3-hydroxybenzenesulfonamide in position 4 decreased more the activity leading to compound 1d.
From all mentioned above it can be concluded that the same substitution at position 3 of the main core of compounds (1′S,6′R)-7-chloro-2′-hydroxy-4,6-dimethoxy-6′- methyl-3′-(4-(methylthio)benzyl)-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohex [2]ene]-3,4′-dione play different role dependent on hCA isoform.
Furthermore, we investigated the activity of our compounds towards three beta (PgiCAβ, SmuCA, and MgCA) and three gamma CAs (BpsCAγ, PgiCAγ, CspCAγ) from different microorganisms. It was found that the compounds showed inhibitory activity against all the bacterial CAs examined but to carrying extents. Only in the case of PgiCAγ, CspCAγ and St.mutans some compounds excited the activity of reference drug. Thus, compound 1a exhibited excellent activity against PgiCAγ with Ki at 9.1 nM and SI 8.5 towards PgiCAβ being 3.5 fold more active than acetazolamide. Three compounds, 1e, 1g and 1j were found to be more potent than the reference drug against CpsCAγ. Among them, the highest activity was achieved for compound 1j with Ki at 176.8 nM compared to acetazolamide (Ki of 502 nM). This compound appeared to be selective towards PgiCAγ, S. mutans, and BpsCAγ with SI 13, 6.9, and 4, respectively. Finally, one compound 1b (Ki at 293.7 nM) was the only which exceeded the activity of the reference drug against S. mutans (Ki of 344 nM and SI 3 towards all other bacterial strains.
In addition, our compounds showed very good activity in the case of the fungal isoform from Malassezia globosa (MgCA), being all twelve compounds more potent than acetazolamide with Ki in the range of 475.6–4346 nM compared to reference drug (Ki of 40,000 nM). The order of activity can be presented as: 1b > 1a > 1c > 1d > 1e > 1i > 1j > 4b > 1g > 4a > 1f > 1h, with the best activity exhibiting by compound 1b with Ki at 475.6 nM followed by compound 1a (Ki of 544 nM). The less potent appeared to be compound 1h with Ki at 4346 nM. The comparison of activity towards MgCA with hCA isoforms revealed that among the most active compounds, only one is common (1d). Besides, compound 1h is between the four most active compounds in the case of hCA isoforms ranking from first to fourth place in the activity order, whereas in the case of MgCA it is the less active one.
According to structure-activity relationship studies the presence of the 4-aminobenzensulfonamide group in the main core (1b) is beneficial for Mg CA inhibitory activity, while its replacement by 4-(aminomethyl)benzenesulfonamide decreased activity leading to compound 1c. The introduction of 4-amino-3-hydroxybenzenesulfonamide resulted in a less active compound (1d) compared to the previous one (3), while the presence of N-(4-sulfamoylbenzyl)acetamide (1h) substituent played a negative role to activity.
Thus, according to obtained results, it is obvious that substituents and their position play an important role in CA inhibitory activity, human and microbial.

2.5. Molecular Docking Studies in Human CAs Isoforms

As representatives of the whole set of compounds, 1c, 1g, 1f, and 1k were chosen for docking studies in order to predict possible inhibition mechanisms.
All human CAs isoforms contain conserved residues His94, His96, and His119 in their active sites. In this way, these residues act as zinc ligands. In addition, all isoforms have two additional conserved residues at the active site, Thr199 and Glu105, that serve as ‘gatekeepers’ [55,56,57]. Nevertheless, these isoforms differ mainly between their middle and exit residues in the active site cavity.
Molecular docking results for the tested compounds on hCA I, II, and IX isoforms are shown in Table 3. Based on these results, all compounds chelating the Zn (II) ion are anions (negative nitrogen of the sulfonamide group) that bind the enzymes in the same manner [57].
Docking results reveal that the selectivity profiles and inhibition modes of some compounds depend on variations in enzyme active sites. The nature of the amino acids in the enzyme’s active site as well as the substitution of each compound determines the conformation that compounds adopt within the active site of the enzyme and how they interact with it.
Taking all these into account, comparing the docking poses in the hCA II enzyme of compounds 4a and 4b with Ki values for the hCA II enzyme of 8.4nM and 755.3 nM respectively, we can say that the para substitution of sulphonamide group in compound 4a plays an important role in the inhibition profile of this compound compared to compound 4b. hCA II enzyme has a hydrophobic residue Phe131 in the active site that provides a bulky environment for the compound to freely enter the active site. Compound 4a having a para substitution of sulphonamide group provides a more line structure that can have the flexibility and enables it to avoid the steric hindrance of the bulky residue Phe131 hCA II isoform, increasing the inhibition potency (Figure 2).
As it is illustrated in Figure 2 this compound (4a) inserts to the active site of the enzyme freely, the negative nitrogen of the sulphonamide group chelates the Zn (II) ion and forms hydrogen bonds. Moreover, the oxygen atom of the sulphonamide group forms a hydrogen bond with residue Thr199 (distance 1.73). Furthermore, the benzene moiety is interacting hydrophobically with residues Val121, Leu131, Thr200, and Leu198. These interactions further stabilize the complex and explain its high inhibition potency (Figure 2A).
On the other hand, compound 4b probably because of the presence of meta substitution in the benzene ring cannot fully enter the active site of the enzyme and reach the Zn ion to chelate resulting in its low inhibition potency (Figure 2B,C).
The flexible structure of compound 4i can also explain its inhibition potency towards hCA I, hCA II, and hCA IX enzymes with Ki values of 15.3, 8.1, and 23.3 nM respectively. Indeed, the superposition of this compound bound to hCA I in comparison to hCA II and hCA IX (Figure 3) shows that it can adopt a conformation that favors the interactions with all active sites of the isoforms, avoiding the steric hindrance of the bulky residue Phe131 of hCA II isoform and increasing the stability of each complex and subsequently the inhibition potency of the compound.
In particular, in all isoform structures, the negative nitrogen of the sulphonamide group chelates the Zn (II) ion and forms hydrogen bonds (Figure 3A). In all isoforms, the one oxygen atom of the sulphonamide group forms a hydrogen bond with residue Thr199. Furthermore, in isoform hCA I, the Cl atom of the benzene ring is forming a halogen bond with residue His64. Additionally, the benzene ring is interacting hydrophobically with Val121 and Leu198 (Figure 3A). In isoform hCA IX there are except the aforementioned H-bond with residue Thr199, another three hydrogen bonds formed with residues His119, Gln67, and Gln92. These interactions can probably explain the high ki value of compound 1i against all isoforms and especially its superiority over AAZ in isoform hCA IX. The same conclusion can be made and for compounds 1h and 1j with a similar structure to compound 1i.

2.6. Drug Likeneess

All tested compounds were evaluated for their Drug-likeness and bioavailability scores and the results of the prediction are shown in Table 4. According to prediction, the bioavailability score of most of the compounds was about 0.55 except for compounds 1g, 1h, 1j, 4a and 4b with 0.17 values Only five compounds showed 2 violations of Lipinski’s rule of five and in combination with their excellent Drug-likeness scores ranging from -0.13 to 1.24, it can be concluded that they have good oral bioavailability (Figure 4).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

3.1.1. Synthesis of Griseofulvin Derivatives 1a–d

The mixture of griseofulvic acid 2 (0.68 g, 2 mmol) and corresponding amine (2.2 mmol) (0.18 g, 2.2 mmol of anhydrous sodium acetate was added in case of amine hydrochloride) in AcOH (7 mL) was refluxed 7 h. Next, the obtained solution was evaporated and the residue was dissolved in MeOH (5 mL) and then H2O (5 mL) was added to the solution. The precipitate formed was collected by filtration, washed with 30% aqueous MeOH (3*7 mL), and dried to afford pure compounds 1a–d.
2-(((2S,6′R)-7-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-6′-methyl-2′,3-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexan]-3′-en-4′-yl)amino)ethane-1-sulfonamide 1a.
Yield 42%, m.p. 185–187 °C.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.43 (br. s, 1H, NH), 6.81 (br. s, 2H, NH2), 6.37 (s, 1H, CH), 4.98 (s, 1H, CH), 4.03 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.93 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.54–3.50 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.22–3.18 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.04–2.98 (m, 1H, CH), 2.72–2.65 (m, 1H, CH), 2.41–2.36 (m, 1H, CH), 0.92 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 192.77 (C = O), 185.03 (C = O), 169.55 (C-NH), 164.53, 164.23 (C-OCH3), 157.68, 105.31, 95.51, 94.86, 92.74, 91.04, 57.86, 56.83(C-OCH3), 56.47, 52.64, 37.87, 35.23 (C-CH3), 32.19, 14.93 (CH3).). Anal. Calcd. for C18H21ClN2O7S(%).C, 48.59; H, 4.76; N, 6.30%. Found: C, 48.39; H, 4.80; N, 6.38%.
4-(((2S,6′R)-7-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-6′-methyl-2′,3-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexan]-3′-en-4′-yl)amino)benzenesulfonamide 1b.
Yield 66%, m.p. 234–236 °C.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.44 (s, 1H, NH), 7.83 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, 2CH), 7.36 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, 2CH), 7.18 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.39 (s, 1H, CH), 5.50 (s, 1H, CH), 4.03 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.93 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.24–3.13 (m, 1H, CH), 2.82–2.75 (m, 1H, CH), 2.68–2.61 (m, 1H, CH), 0.97 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 192.16 (C = O), 186.65 (C = O), 169.44, (C-O) 164.38 (C-OCH3), 162.00, 157.81, 142.07, 140.19, 127.65, 122.99, 105.07, 96.84 (C-Cl), 95.57, 94.77, 91.22, 56.89(O-CH3), 56.47 (O-CH3), 32.61 (C-CH3), 18.99, 14.85 (CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C22H21ClN2O7S(%).C, 53.61; H, 4.29; N, 5.68%. Found: C, 53.35; H, 4.47; N, 5.76%.
4-((((2S,6′R)-7-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-6′-methyl-2′,3-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexan]-3′-en-4′-yl)amino)methyl)benzenesulfonamide 1c.
Yield 57%, m.p. 202–204 °C.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.01 (br. s, 1H, NH), 7.83 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, 2CH), 7.48 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, 2CH), 7.12 (br. s, 2H, NH2), 6.36 (s, 1H, CH), 4.83 (s, 1H, CH), 4.40 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.02 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.91 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.15–3.00 (m, 1H, CH), 2.71–2.62 (m, 1H, CH), 2.52–2.48 (m, 1H, CH), 0.93 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 192.16 (C = O), 186.65 (C = O), 169.44 (C-NH), 164.38, 162.00 (C-OCH3), 157.81 (C-OCH3), 142.07 (C-SO2), 140.19, 127.65 (2C), 122.99 (2C), 105.07, 96.84, 95.57, 94.77, 91.22, 57.90 (O-CH3), 56.89 (O-CH3), 56.47, 39.86, 32.61 (C-CH3), 18.99, 14.85 (C-CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C23H24ClN2O7S(%).C, 53.49; H, 4.57; N, 5.53%. Found: C, 53.50; H, 4.47; N, 5.6%.
4-(((2S,6′R)-7-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-6′-methyl-2′,3-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexan]-3′-en-4′-yl)amino)-3-hydroxybenzenesulfonamide 1d.
Yield 64%, m.p. 255–257 °C.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.28 (s, 1H, NH), 8.79 (s, 1H, OH), 7.42 (s, 1H, CH), 7.31 (s, 2H, 2CH), 7.10 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.37 (s, 1H, CH), 5.07 (s, 1H, CH), 4.03 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.93 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.22–3.01 (m, 1H, CH), 2.78–2.67 (m, 2H, 2CH), 0.96 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 192.54 (C = O), 185.84 (C = O), 169.51 (C-O), 164.28 (C-OCH3), 163.84 (C-NH), 157.73(C-OCH3), 151.68, 142.60 (C-S), 128.81, 127.03, 117.21, 114.09, 105.23, 95.53, 94.82, 91.10, 57.88(O-CH3), 56.85 (O-CH3), 35.32 (C-CH3), 32.05, 14.96 (CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C22H21ClN2O8S(%).C, 51.92; H, 4.16; N, 5.50%. Found: C, 51.89; H, 4.29; N, 5.76%.

3.1.2. Synthesis of Griseofulvin Derivatives 1e,f

The mixture of griseofulvic acid 2 (0,68 g, 2 mmol) and corresponding amine (2.2 mmol) (0.22 g, 2.2 mmol of Et3N was added in case of amine hydrochloride) in triethyl orthoformate (7 mL) was refluxed for 6 h. Next, the obtained solution was evaporated and the residue was dissolved in MeOH (5 mL) and then H2O (5 mL) was added to the solution. The precipitate formed was collected by filtration, washed with 30% aqueous MeOH (3*7 mL), and dried to afford pure compounds 1e,f.
4-((((2R,2′R)-7-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-2′-methyl-3,4′,6′-trioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexan]-5′-ylidene)methyl)amino)methyl)benzenesulfonamide 1e.
Yield 47%, m.p. 199–201 °C. A mixture of E- and Z-isomers. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.53 (br. s, 0.5H, NH), 11,17 (br. s, 0.5H, NH), 8.35 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 0.5H, CH), 8.24 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 0.5H, CH), 7.83 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, 2CH), 7.51 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, 2CH), 7.21 (br. s, 2H, NH2), 6.40 (s, 1H, CH), 4.78 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.03 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.93 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.08–2.91 (m, 1H, CH), 2.85–2.68 (m, 1H, CH), 2.52–2.47 (m, 1H, CH), 0.91 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 194.24 (C = O), 191.75 (C = O), 188.46 (C = O), 165.09, 165.04, 163.55 (C-OCH3), 159.48 (C-OCH3), 143.10, (C-SO2) 140.41, 127.01 (2C), 126.43 (2C), 105.48, 102.01, 101.52, 92.70, 88.47, 56.49 (C-OCH3), 56.39 (C-OCH3), 52.19, 40.82, 31.64, 14.34 (C-CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C24H23ClN2O8S(%).C, 53.88; H, 4.33; N, 5.24%. Found: C, 53.89; H, 4.37; N, 5.31%.
4-(2-((((2R,2′R)-7-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-2′-methyl-3,4′,6′-trioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexan]-5′-ylidene)methyl)amino)ethyl)benzenesulfonamide 1f.
Yield 51%, m.p. 193–195 °C. A mixture of E- and Z-isomers. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.32 (br. s, 0.5H, NH), 10,90 (br. s, 0.5H, NH), 8.21 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 0.5H, CH), 8.05 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 0.5H, CH), 7.82–7.72 (m, 2H, 2CH), 7.48–7.36 (m, 2H, 2CH), 7.09 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.41 (s, 1H, CH), 4.05 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.94 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.81–3.73 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.05–2.94 (m, 3H, CH2 + CH), 2.77–2.68 (m, 1H, CH), 2.51–2.33 (m, 1H, CH), 0.92 (d, J = 6.3, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 185.83 (3C, C = O), 164.55 (4C), 129.71 (2C), 126.27 (4C), 95.54, 94.81, 94.49, 91.31 (2C), 57.97 (O-CH3), 56.93 (O-CH3), 51.26 (CH2-NH), 33.48 (3C), 15.00 (CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C25H25ClN2O8S(%).C, 54.69; H, 4.59; N, 5.10%. Found: C, 54.59; H, 4.65; N, 5.00%.

3.1.3. Synthesis of Griseofulvin Derivatives 1g–j

The solution of corresponding ester 3 (2 mmol) in AcOH (8 mL) was refluxed for 5 h. Then obtained solution was evaporated, the residue was dissolved in MeCN (7 mL) and corresponding amine (2.2 mmol) was added (0.22 g, 2.2 mmol of Et3N was used in case of amine hydrochloride). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 8 h, then the solution was evaporated. The residue was dissolved in MeOH (5 mL), HClconc (1 mL) and H2O (25 mL) were added to the reaction mixture. The precipitate formed was collected by filtration, washed with 2% HCl solution (3*10 mL) and H2O (3*10 mL), and dried to afford pure compounds 1g–j.
3-((2S,2′R)-7-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-2′-methyl-3,4′,6′-trioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexan]-5′-yl)-3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-N-(2-sulfamoylethyl)propenamide 1g.
Yield 68%, m.p. 204–206 °C.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.17 (br. s, 1H, OH), 7.60 (br. s, 1H, NH), 6.75 (s, 1H, CH), 6.67–6.55 (m, 4H, 2CH + NH2), 6.37 (s, 1H, CH), 4.53 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.02 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.92 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.74 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.41–3.35 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.16–2.46 (m, 7H, 5CH+CH2), 0.91 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 201.35 (C = O), 196.73 (2C, C = O), 173.06 (C = O), 162.91 (C-OCH3), 157.12 (C-OCH3), 156.72 (C-OCH3), 151.24 (C-OH), 149.37, 144.04, 140.28, 127.73, 124.39, 111.00, 106.90, 104.79, 101.64, 90.53, 60.33 (2C), 56.47 (3C), 31.46, 30.46 (2C), 19.00 (2C), 13.49 (C-CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C28H31ClN2O11S(%).C, 52.62; H, 4.89; N, 4.38%. Found: C, 52.59; H, 4.91; N, 4.34%.
3-((2S,2′R)-7-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-2′-methyl-3,4′,6′-trioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexan]-5′-yl)-3-(4-(methylthio)phenyl)-N-(4-sulfamoylbenzyl)propenamide 1h.
Yield 86%, m.p. 233–235 °C.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.18 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.72 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, 2CH), 7.28–7.01 (m, 8H, 6CH+NH2), 6.38 (s, 1H, CH), 4.63 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.27 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.03 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.91 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.06–2.87 (m, 2H, 2 CH), 2.65–2.51 (m, 3H, 3CH), 2.44 (s, 3H, SCH3), 0.90 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.33 (3C, C = O), 164.38, 157.78 (C-OCH3), 144.21 (C-OCH3), 142.83 (C-S), 134.98 (C-S-CH3), 128.73 (2C), 127.55 (4C), 126.16 (2C), 125.96 (4C), 104.76 (2C), 57.91, 56.84 (2C), 42.04 (3C), 35.34 (2C), 15.45 (S-CH3) 14.79 (C-CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C33H33ClN2O9S(%).C, 56.52; H, 4.74; N, 4.00 %. Found: C, 56.50; H, 4.77; N, 4.05%.
3-((2S,2′R)-7-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-2′-methyl-3,4′,6′-trioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexan]-5′-yl)-3-(4-(methylthio)phenyl)-N-(4-sulfamoylphenethyl)propenamide 1i.
Yield 72%, m.p. 192–194 °C.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.81–7.62 (m, 3H, 2CH+NH), 7.28 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H, 2CH), 7.17 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, 2CH), 7.10–7.01 (m, 4H, 2CH+NH2), 6.37 (s, 1H, CH), 4.60 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.03 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.88 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.23 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.01–2.82 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.71–2.52 (m, 5H, 5CH), 2.42 (s, 3H, SCH3), 0.90 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.30 (3C, C = O), 164.36 (2C), 157.76 (C-OCH3), 144.33, 142.35 (C-S), 134.82, 129.49 (2C), 128.56, 128.43 (2C), 126.10 (2C), 126.07 (2C), 109.98, 104.73, 95.50 (2C), 57.91 (2C), 56.80 (O-CH3), 35.27 (2C), 35.00 (4C), 15.41 (S-CH3), 14.80 (C-CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C34H35ClN2O9S(%).C, 57.10; H, 4.93; N, 3.92 %. Found: C, 57.08; H, 4.89; N, 3.95%.
3-((2S,2′R)-7-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-2′-methyl-3,4′,6′-trioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexan]-5′-yl)-3-(4-(methylthio)phenyl)-N-(2-oxo-2-((4-sulfamoylphenyl)amino)ethyl)propenamide 1j.
Yield 83%, m.p. 245–247 °C.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.04 (s, 1H, NH), 7.85–7.66 (m, 5H, 4CH+NH), 7.24–7.00 (m, 6H, 4CH+NH2), 6.36 (s, 1H, CH), 4.64 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.02 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.88 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.81 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.07–2.86 (m, 2H, 2CH), 2.63–2.52 (m, 3H, 3CH), 2.41 (s, 3H, SCH3), 0.90 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 168.93 (3C, C = O), 164.37 (3C), 157.78 (C-OCH3), 138.74 (C-S-CH3), 128.48 (2C, C-S), 127.13 (3C), 126.20 (4C), 119.05 (3C), 91.18 (3C), 57.91 (2C), 56.84 (3C), 34.80 (3C), 15.48 (S-CH3), 14.80 (C-CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C34H34ClN3O10S2(%).C, 54.87; H, 4.60; N, 5.65%. Found: C, 54.89; H, 4.67; N, 5.55%.

3.1.4. Synthesis of Usnic Acid Derivatives 4a,b

The mixture of (R)-usnic acid 5 (0.52 g, 1.5 mmol) and corresponding amine (1.7 mmol) (0.2 g, 2.0 mmol of Et3N was added in the case of amine hydrochloride) was refluxed in EtOH (7 mL) for 1 h. Then obtained reaction mixture was cooled, diluted with 1% HCl solution (50 mL), stirred for 2 h at room temperature, and left overnight. The precipitate formed was collected by filtration, washed with 1% HCl solution (3*20 mL), H2O (3*20 mL), and dried to afford pure compounds 4a,b.
(R)-4-((1-(6-acetyl-7,9-dihydroxy-8,9b-dimethyl-1,3-dioxo-3,9b-dihydrodibenzo[b,d]furan-2(1H)-ylidene)ethyl)amino)-3-hydroxybenzenesulfonamide 4a.
Yield 67%, m.p. 201–203 °C.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 14.68 (s, 1H, NH), 13.29 (s, 1H, OH), 11.86 (s, 1H, OH), 10.85 (br. s, 1H, OH), 7.61–7.10 (m, 5H, 3CH+NH2), 5.89 (s, 1H, CH), 2.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.59 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.77 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 200.95 (C = O), 197.52 (C = O), 183.33 (C = O), 179.37, 169.23 (C-CH3), 162.74 (C-OH), 157.57 (C-OH), 156.65, 147.79, 137.26 (C-SO2), 131.57, 122.91, 122.75, 111.32, 108.72, 107.53, 103.76, 103.34, 102.57, 61.10 (C-CH3), 31.28 (CO-CH3), 28.47 (C-CH3), 18.54 (C-CH3), 18.15 (C-CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C25H25N2O9S(%).C, 56.70; H, 4.76; N, 5.29 %. Found: C, 56.69; H, 4.69; N, 5.30%.
(R)-3-((1-(6-acetyl-7,9-dihydroxy-8,9b-dimethyl-1,3-dioxo-3,9b-dihydrodibenzo[b,d]furan-2(1H)-ylidene)ethyl)amino)-4-hydroxybenzenesulfonamide 4b.
Yield 54%, m.p. 215–217 °C.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 14.64 (s, 1H, NH), 13.29 (s, 1H, OH), 11.86 (s, 1H, OH), 11.01 (br. s, 1H, OH), 7.69 (s, 2H, 2CH), 7.19–6.95 (m, 3H, CH+NH2), 5.88 (s, 1H, CH), 2.66 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.58 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.02 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.76 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 201.35 (C = O), 198.60 (C = O), 174.93, 174.88, 163.00 (2C), 157.88 (C-OH), 156.08, 155.03, 135.46 (C-S), 127.65, 125.34 (2C), 123.41, 116.88 (2C), 106.95 (C-CH3), 105.46, 103.08, 57.20, 32.07 (CO-CH3), 31.51 (C-CH3), 20.85 (2C, C-CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C24H22N2O9S(%).C, 56.03; H, 4.31; N, 5.44%. Found: C, 56.01; H, 4.37; N, 5.38%.

3.2. CA Inhibition Assay

An applied photophysics stopped-flow instrument was used for assaying the CA-catalyzed CO2 hydration activity. Phenol red (at a concentration of 0.2 mM) was used as an indicator, working at the absorbance maximum of 557 nm, with 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.4) for α-class as a buffer, 20 mM TRIS (pH 8.3) for β- and γ-class as a buffer, and 20 mM Na2SO4 (for maintaining constant ionic strength), following the initial rates of the CA-catalyzed CO2 hydration reaction for a period of 10–100 s. The CO2 concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 17 mM for the determination of the kinetic parameters and inhibition constants. The non-catalyzed CO2 hydration was not subtracted from these curves and accounts for the remaining observed activity even at a high concentration of inhibitor, being in the range of 16–25%. However, the background activity from the uncatalyzed reaction is always subtracted when IC50 values are obtained by using the data analysis software for the stopped-flow instrument. Enzyme concentrations ranged between 5 and 10 nM. For each inhibitor, at least six traces of the initial 5–10% of the reaction were used for determining the initial velocity. The uncatalyzed rates were determined in the same manner and subtracted from the total observed rates. Stock solutions of the inhibitor (0.1 mM) were prepared in distilled–deionized water, and dilutions up to 0.01 nM were done thereafter with the assay buffer. Inhibitor and enzyme solutions were preincubated together for 15 min at room temperature prior to the assay to allow for the formation of the E–I complex. The inhibition constants were obtained by non-linear least-squares methods using PRISM 3 and the Cheng–Prusoff equation, as reported earlier, and represent the mean from at least three different determinations. All CA isoforms were recombinant proteins obtained in-house, as reported earlier [58,59,60] and their concentrations in the assay system were in the range of 6.2–14.8 nM.

3.3. Molecular Docking Studies

Molecular modeling studies were performed using the software AutoDock 4.2 (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA) [61]. Protein Data Bank was also used in order to obtain the he crystal structures ofhCA I (PDB code 3W6H) and hCA II (PDB code 3HS4) cytosolic isoforms as well as hCA IX (PDB code 3IAI) transmembrane tumor-associated isoform [62]. All the procedure was carried out as in our previous works [41,42].

3.4. Drug Likeness

The study was performed as described in our previous paper [41].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we synthetized and investigated a novel griseofulvin and usnic acid sulfonamides for their effective inhibition against three relevant human carbonic anhydrase isoforms, such as the ubiquitous hCA I and hCA II isoforms and the tumor-associated isoforms hCA IX, which are involved in many diseases such as glaucoma, retinitis pigmentosa, epilepsy, and tumors. Furthermore, the inhibitory activity against β- and γ-CAs from three different bacterial and one fungal strain was evaluated. Six compounds (1b–1d, 1h, 1i and 1j) were more potent than AAZ against hCA I while five (1d, 1h, 1i, 1j and 4a) showed better activity than AAZ against the hCA II isoform. It should be mentioned that compound 1d demonstrated the best activity with Ki 4.9 nm and selectivity index (SI) towards hCA I and hCA IX isoforms 5.88 and 6.00 respectively. The investigation of CA inhibitory activity against bacterial stains (Burkholderia pseudomallei-BpsCAγ, Porphyromonas gingivalis (PgiCAβ and PgiCAγ), Colwellia psychrerythraea (CpsCA) as well as Streptococcus mutans, Malassezia globosa) revealed that only in case of PgiCAγ, CspCAγ and St. mutans some compounds excited the activity of reference drug Moreover, all compounds appeared to be very potent against the MgCA with a Ki lower than that of the reference drug. The comparison of activity towards MgCA with hCA isoforms revealed that among the most active compounds, only one is common (1d. Furthermore, computational procedures were used to investigate the binding mode of this class of compounds against hCA isoforms, and the obtained results were in agreement with the experimental data.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24032802/s1. References [61,62,63] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G. and V.K.; methodology, B.L. and A.K.; software, A.P.; formal analysis, A.K. and A.P.; investigation, A.A. and C.C.; data curation, A.A. and C.T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.; writing—review and editing, A.G.; visualization, A.P.; supervision, A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Supuran, C.T. Carbonic anhydrases: From biomedical applications of the inhibitors and activators to biotechnological use for CO2 capture. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2013, 28, 229–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Supuran, C.T.; McKenna, R. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors drug design. In Carbonic Anhydrase: Mechanism, Regulation, Links to Disease, and Industrial Applications; McKenna, R., Frost, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 291–323. [Google Scholar]
  3. Esbaugh, A.J.; Tufts, B.L. The structure and function of carbonic anhydrase isozymes in the respiratory system of vertebrates. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2006, 154, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nishimori, I.; Minakuchi, T.; Onishi, S. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: Cloning, characterization, and inhibition studies of the cytosolic isozyme III with sulfonamides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 7229–7236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pacchiano, F.; Carta, F.; McDonald, P.C.; Lou, Y.; Vullo, D.; Scozzafava, A.; Dedhar, S.; Supuran, C.T. Ureido-substituted benzenesulfonamides potently inhibit carbonic anhydrase IX and show antimetastatic activity in a model of breast cancer metastasis. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 1896–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Supuran, C.T. Carbonic anhydrase activators. Future Med. Chem. 2018, 10, 561–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zamanova, S.; Shabana, A.M.; Mondal, U.K.; Ilies, M.A. Carbonic anhydrases as disease markers. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2019, 29, 509–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nocentini, A.; Supuran, C.T. Advances in the structural annotation of human carbonic anhydrases and impact on future drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2019, 14, 1175–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kocak, S.; Lolak, N.; Bua, S. α-Carbonic anhydrases are strongly activated by spinaceamine deriva-tives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019, 27, 800–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abo-Ashour, M.F.; Eldehna, W.M.; Nocentini, A.; Ibrahim, H.S.; Bua, S.; Abdel-Aziz, H.A.; Abou-Seri, S.M.; Supuran, C.T. Novel synthesized SLC-0111 thiazole and thiadiazole analogues:Determination of their carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity and molecular modeling studies. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 87, 794–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lolak, N.; Akocak, S.; Bua, S.; Koca, M.; Supuran, C.T. Design and synthesis of novel 1,3-diaryltriazene-substituted sulfonamides as potent and selective carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2018, 77, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lolak, N.; Akocak, S.; Bua, S.; Sanku, R.K.K.; Supuran, C.T. Discovery of new ureido benzenesulfonamides incorporating 1,3,5-triazine moieties as carbonic anhydrase I, II, IX and inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019, 27, 1588–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Suthar, S.K.; Bansal, S.; Lohan, S.; Modak, V.; Chaudhary, A.; Tiwari, A. Design and synthesis of novel 4-(4-oxo-2-arylthiazolidin-3-yl) benzenesulfonamides as selective inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase IX over I and II with potential anticancer activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 66, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Supuran, C.T. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and their potential in a range of therapeutic areas. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2018, 28, 709–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kartsev, V.; Geronikaki, A.; Petrou, A.; Lichitsky, B.; Kostic, M.; Smiljkovic, M.; Soković, M.; Sirakanyan, S. Griseofulvin Derivatives: Synthesis, Molecular Docking and Biological Evaluation. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 1145–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Geronikaki, A.; Kartsev, V.; Petrou, A.; Akrivou, M.G.; Vizirianakis, I.S.; Chatzopoulou, F.M.; Lichitsky, B.; Sirakanyan, S.; Kostic, M.; Smiljkovic, M.; et al. Antibacterial activity of griseofulvin analogues as an example of drug repurposing. Int. J. Antimicrob Agents 2020, 55, 105884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kartsev, V.; Lichisky, B.; Geronikaki, A.; Petrou, A.; Smiljkovic, M.; Kostic, M.; Radanovic, O.; Soković, M. Design, synthesis and antimicrobial activity of usnic acid derivatives. Med. Chem. Commun. 2019, 10, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, X.; Guo, Q.; Su, G.; Yang, A.; Hu, Z.; Qu, C.; Wan, Z.; Li, R.; Tu, P.; Chai, X. Usnic Acid Derivatives with Cytotoxic and Antifungal Activities from the Lichen Usnea longissima. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 1373–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guzow-Krzemińska, B.; Guzow, K.; Herman-Antosiewicz, A. Usnic Acid Derivatives as Cytotoxic Agents against Cancer Cells and the Mechanisms of Their Activity. Curr. Pharm. Rep. 2019, 5, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pyrczak-Felczykowska, A.; Narlawar, R.; Pawlik, A.; Guzow-Krzemińska, B.; Artymiuk, D.; Hać, A.; Ryś, K.; Rendina, L.M.; Reekie, T.A.; Herman-Antosiewicz, A.; et al. Synthesis of Usnic Acid Derivatives and Evaluation of Their Antiproliferative Activity against Cancer Cells. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 1768–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sokolov, D.N.; Zarubaev, V.V.; Shtro, A.A.; Polovinka, M.P.; Luzina, O.A.; Komarova, N.I.; Salakhutdinov, N.F.; Kiselev, O.I. Anti-viral activity of (−)- and (+)-usnic acids and their derivatives against influenza virus A (H1N1) 2009. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 7060–7064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aris, P.; Mohamadzadeh, M.; Wei, Y.; Xia, X. In Silico Molecular Dynamics of Griseofulvin and Its Derivatives Revealed Potential Therapeutic Applications for COVID-19. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Oh, E.; Wang, W.; Park, K.H. (+)-Usnic acid and its salts, inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2,identified by using in silico methods and in vitro assay. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Borisov, S.A.; Luzina, O.; Khvostov, M.; Tolstikova, M.; Salak, N. Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of (+)-Usnic Acid Derivatives as Hypoglycemic Agents. Molbank 2022, 2022, M1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cetin Cakmak, K.; Gülçin, İ. Anticholinergic and antioxidant activities of usnic acid-an activity-structure insight. Toxicol. Rep. 2019, 6, 1273–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, H.Y.; Jin, C.; Zhang, H.M.; Jin, C.M.; Shen, Q.K.; Quan, Z.S. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of (+)-Usnic Acid Derivatives as Potential Anti-Toxoplasma gondii Agents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 9630–9642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ovung, A.; Bhattacharyya, J. Sulfonamide drugs: Structure, antibacterial property, toxicity, and biophysical interactions. Biophys. Rev. 2021, 13, 259–272. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mohamed, H.; Haiba, M.; Mohamed, N.; Awad, G.; Ahmed, N. New hydronaphthalene-sulfonamide derivatives: Synthesis, antimicrobial evaluation and QSAR study. J. Mol. Str. 2021, 1246, 131108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shahzad, S.; Qadir, M.A.; Ahmed, M.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, M.J.; Gulzar, A.; Muddassar, M. Folic acid-sulfonamide conjugates as antibacterial agents: Design, synthesis and molecular docking studies. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 42983–42992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wan, Y.; Fang, G.; Chen, H.; Deng, X. Sulfonamide derivatives as potential anti-cancer agents and their SARs elucidation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 226, 113837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pingaew, R.; Mandi, P.; Prachayasittikul, V.; Thongnum, A.; Prachayasittikul, S.; Ruchirawat, S.; Prachayasittikul, V. Investigations on Anticancer and Antimalarial Activities of Indole-Sulfonamide Derivatives and In Silico Studies. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 31854–31868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Firdous, F.; Ibrahim, R.; Furqan, M.; Khan, N.; Raza, H.; Singh, U.; Emwas, A.-H.; Jaremko, M.; Chotana, G.A.; Faisal, A.; et al. Synthesisand Characterization of Griseofulvin Derivatives as Microtubule-Stabilizing Agents. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e20220283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Akgul, O.; Di Cesare Mannelli, L.; Vullo, D.; Angeli, A.; Ghelardini, C.; Bartolucci, G.; Altamimi, A.S.A.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C.T.; Carta, F. Discovery of Novel Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors Hybrids (NSAIDs–CAIs) for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 4961–4977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abdel-Maksoud, M.S.; Mohamed Hassan, R.; Abdel-Sattar El-Azzouny, A.; Nabil Aboul-Enein, M.; Oh, C.H. Anticancer profile and anti-inflammatory effect of new N-(2-((4-(1,3-diphenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl) pyridine sulfonamide derivatives. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 117, 105424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Güngör, S.A.; Şahin, İ.; Güngör, Ö.; Tok, T.T.; Köse, M. Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Docking Study of Mono- and Di-Sulfonamide Derivatives as Antioxidant Agents and Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors. Chem. Biodivers. 2022, 19, e202200325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Durgapal, S.; Soman, S. Evaluation of novel coumarin-proline sulfonamide hybrids as anticancer and antidiabetic agents. Synth. Commun. 2019, 49, 2869–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khalid, Z.; Alnuwaiser, M.A.; Ahmad, H.A.; Shafqat, S.S.; Munawar, M.A.; Kamran, K.; Abbas, M.M.; Kalam, M.A.; Ewida, M.A. Experimental and Computational Analysis of Newly Synthesized Benzotriazinone Sulfonamides as Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitors. Molecules 2022, 27, 6783–6799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ekoh, O.C.; Okoro, U.; Ugwu, D.; Ali, R.; Okafor, S.; Ugwuja, D.; Attah, S. Novel Dipeptides Bearing Sulfonamide as Antimalarial and Antitrypanosomal Agents: Synthesis and Molecular Docking. Med. Chem. 2022, 18, 394–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Azzam, R.A.; Elsayed, R.E.; Elgemeie, G.H. Design, Synthesis, and Antimicrobial Evaluation of a New Series of N-Sulfonamide 2-Pyridones as Dual Inhibitors of DHPS and DHFR Enzymes. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 10401–10414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Xuan, G.S.; Zhan, J.H.; Zhang, A.M.; Li, W.; Zheng, K. Inhibition of carbonic anhydrase II by sulfonamide derivatives. Pharmazie 2021, 76, 412–415. [Google Scholar]
  41. Angeli, A.; Kartsev, V.; Petrou, A.; Pinteala, M.; Vydzhak, R.M.; Panchishin, S.Y.; Brovarets, V.; De Luca, V.; Capasso, C.; Geronikaki, A.; et al. New Sulfanilamide Derivatives Incorporating Heterocyclic Carboxamide Moieties as Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 828–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Angeli, A.; Kartsev, V.; Petrou, A.; Lichitsky, B.; Komogortsev, A.; Pinteala, M.; Geronikaki, A.; Supuran, C.T. Pyrazolo [4, 3-c] pyridine Sulfonamides as Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors: Synthesis, Biological and In Silico Studies. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 316–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Supuran, C.T. Carbon- versus sulphur-based zinc binding groups for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors? J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2018, 33, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Zhao, C.; Rakesh, K.P.; Ravidar, L.; Fang, W.Y.; Qin, H.L. Pharmaceutical and medicinal significance of sulfur (SVI)-Containing motifs for drug discovery: A critical review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 162, 679–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lagunin, A.; Stepanchikova, A.; Filimonov, D.; Poroikov, V. PASS: Prediction of activity spectra for biologically active substances. Bioinformatics 2000, 16, 747–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Banerjee, P.; Eckert, A.O.; Schrey, A.K.; Preissner, R. ProTox-II: A webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W257–W263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. GHS-unece. Available online: http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_welcome_e.html (accessed on 5 January 2023).
  48. Ronnest, M.H.; Harris, P.; Gotfredsen, C.; Larsen, T.; Clausen, M. Synthesis and single crystal X-ray analysis of two griseofulvin metabolites. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5881–5882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hewitson, K.S.; Vullo, D.; Scozzafava, A.; Mastrolorenzo, A.; Supuran, C.T. Molecular cloning, characterization, and inhibition studies of a β-carbonic anhydrase from Malassezia globosa, a potential antidandruff target. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 3513–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Del Prete, S.; De Luca, V.; Vullo, D.; Scozzafava, A.; Carginale, V.; Supuran, C.T.; Capasso, C. Biochemical characterization of the γ-carbonic anhydrase from the oral pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis, PgiCA. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2014, 29, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Del Prete, S.; Vullo, D.; De Luca, V.; AlOthman, Z.; Osman, S.M.; Supuran, C.T.; Capasso, C. Biochemical characterization of recombinant β-carbonic anhydrase (PgiCAb) identified in the genome of the oral pathogenic bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2015, 30, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vullo, D.; Del Prete, S.; Osman, S.M.; Alasmary, F.A.S.; AlOthman, Z.; Donald, W.A.; Capasso, C.; Supuran, C.T. Comparison of the amine/amino acid activation profiles of the β- and γ-carbonic anhydrases from the pathogenic bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2018, 33, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dedeoglu, N.; De Luca, V.; Isik, S.; Yildirim, H.; Kockar, F.; Capasso, C.; Supuran, C.T. Cloning, characterization and anion inhibition study of a β-class carbonic anhydrase from the caries producing pathogen Streptococcus mutans. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 2995–3001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. De Luca, V.; Vullo, D.; Del Prete, S.; Carginale, V.; Osman, S.M.; Al Othman, Z.; Supuran, C.T.; Capasso, C. Cloning, characterization and anion inhibition studies of a γ-carbonic anhydrase from the Antarctic bacterium Colwellia psychrerythraea. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alterio, V.; Hilvo, M.; Di Fiore, A.; Supuran, C.T.; Pan, P.; Parkkila, S.; Scaloni, A.; Pastorek, J.; Pastorekova, S.; Scozzafava, A. Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of the tumor-associated human carbonic anhydrase IX. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 16233–16238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Di Fiore, A.; Truppo, E.; Supuran, C.T.; Alterio, V.; Dathan, N.; Bootorabi, F.; Parkkila, S.; Monti, S.M.; De Simone, G. Crystal structure of the C183S/C217S mutant of human CA VII in complex with acetazolamide. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 5023–5026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Supuran, C.T. Structure-based drug discovery of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2012, 27, 759–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stefanucci, A.; Angeli, A.; Dimmito, M.P.; Luisi, G.; Del Prete, S.; Capasso, C.; Donald, W.A.; Mollica, A.; Supuran, C.T. Activation of β- and γ-carbonic anhydrases from pathogenic bacteria with tripeptides. J Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2018, 33, 945–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Angeli, A.; di Cesare Mannelli, L.; Lucarini, E.; Peat, T.S.; Ghelardini, C.; Supuran, C.T. Design, synthesis and X-ray crystallography of selenides bearing benzenesulfonamide moiety with neuropathic pain modulating effects. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 154, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Angeli, A.; Pinteala, M.; Maier, S.S.; Simionescu, B.C.; Milaneschi, A.; Abbas, G.; Del Prete, S.; Capasso, C.; Capperucci, A.; Tanini, D.; et al. Evaluation of Thio- and Seleno-Acetamides Bearing Benzenesulfonamide as Inhibitor of Carbonic Anhydrases from Different Pathogenic Bacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Morris, G.M.; Huey, R.; Lindstrom, W.; Sanner, M.F.; Belew, R.K.; Goodsell, D.S.; Olson, A.J. Autodock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexiblity. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 16, 2785–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Available online: http://www.rcsb.org/ (accessed on 19 November 2022).
  63. Huey, R.; Morris, G.; Olson, A.; Goodsell, D. A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation. J. Comp. Chem. 2007, 28, 1145–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 02802 g001 550
Figure 1. The structure of approved sulfonamide drugs.
Figure 1. The structure of approved sulfonamide drugs.
Ijms 24 02802 g001
Ijms 24 02802 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of compounds 1a–d.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of compounds 1a–d.
Ijms 24 02802 sch001
Ijms 24 02802 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of compounds 1e,f.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of compounds 1e,f.
Ijms 24 02802 sch002
Ijms 24 02802 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthesis of compounds 1g–j.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of compounds 1g–j.
Ijms 24 02802 sch003
Ijms 24 02802 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Synthesis of compounds 4a,b.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of compounds 4a,b.
Ijms 24 02802 sch004
Ijms 24 02802 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) 2D interaction diagram of compound 4a docking pose interactions with the key amino acids in hCA II, (B) 2D interaction diagram of compound 4b docking pose interactions with the key amino acids in hCA II. (C) Superposition of compound 4a (blue) bound to hCA II in comparison to compound 4b (red) to hCA II, with specific residues labeled. Active site zinc is shown as a blue sphere, red dotted arrows indicate H-bonds, and yellow spheres hydrophobic interactions.
Figure 2. (A) 2D interaction diagram of compound 4a docking pose interactions with the key amino acids in hCA II, (B) 2D interaction diagram of compound 4b docking pose interactions with the key amino acids in hCA II. (C) Superposition of compound 4a (blue) bound to hCA II in comparison to compound 4b (red) to hCA II, with specific residues labeled. Active site zinc is shown as a blue sphere, red dotted arrows indicate H-bonds, and yellow spheres hydrophobic interactions.
Ijms 24 02802 g002
Ijms 24 02802 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) 2D interaction diagram of compound 1i docking pose interactions with the key amino acids in hCA I, hCA II, and hCA IX (B) Superposition of compound 1i (yellow)bound to hCA I in comparison with its binding to hCA II (magenta) and hCA IX (blue) isoforms. Active site zinc shown as blue sphere, red dotted arrows indicate H-bonds, pink arrow halogen bond and yellow spheres hydrophobic interactions.
Figure 3. (A) 2D interaction diagram of compound 1i docking pose interactions with the key amino acids in hCA I, hCA II, and hCA IX (B) Superposition of compound 1i (yellow)bound to hCA I in comparison with its binding to hCA II (magenta) and hCA IX (blue) isoforms. Active site zinc shown as blue sphere, red dotted arrows indicate H-bonds, pink arrow halogen bond and yellow spheres hydrophobic interactions.
Ijms 24 02802 g003
Ijms 24 02802 g004 550
Figure 4. Drug-likeness model and bioavailability Radar of the compounds 1d and 1i. The pink area represents the optimal range for each property for oral bioavailability, (Lipophilicity (LIPO): XLOGP3 between −0.7 and +5.0, Molecular weight (SIZE): MW between 150 and 500 g/mol, Polarity (POLAR) TPSA between 20 and 130 Å2, Solubility (INSOLU): log S not higher than 6, Saturation (INSATU): fraction of carbons in the sp3 hybridization not less than 0.25, and Flexibility (FLEX): no more than 9 rotatable bonds.
Figure 4. Drug-likeness model and bioavailability Radar of the compounds 1d and 1i. The pink area represents the optimal range for each property for oral bioavailability, (Lipophilicity (LIPO): XLOGP3 between −0.7 and +5.0, Molecular weight (SIZE): MW between 150 and 500 g/mol, Polarity (POLAR) TPSA between 20 and 130 Å2, Solubility (INSOLU): log S not higher than 6, Saturation (INSATU): fraction of carbons in the sp3 hybridization not less than 0.25, and Flexibility (FLEX): no more than 9 rotatable bonds.
Ijms 24 02802 g004
Table
Table 1. Structures of compounds.
Table 1. Structures of compounds.
NoStructureNoStructure
1aIjms 24 02802 i0011gIjms 24 02802 i002
1bIjms 24 02802 i0031hIjms 24 02802 i004
1cIjms 24 02802 i0051iIjms 24 02802 i006
1dIjms 24 02802 i0071jIjms 24 02802 i008
1eIjms 24 02802 i0094aIjms 24 02802 i010
1fIjms 24 02802 i0114bIjms 24 02802 i012
Table
Table 2. Inhibition data of human CA isoforms I, II, IX, and β, γ from some bacterial and fungal strains with titled compounds and AAZ by a stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay.
Table 2. Inhibition data of human CA isoforms I, II, IX, and β, γ from some bacterial and fungal strains with titled compounds and AAZ by a stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay.
KI (nM) *
CmphCA IhCA IIhCAIXMgCAPgiCAβPgiCAγSmuCABpsCAγCpsCAγ
1a562.0653.431.2544.0778.692.11629448.23149
1b233.664.4203.1475.6818.9820.3293.7945.0938.9
1c74.629.1102.0568.5896.2660.63997833.0899.9
1d28.84.929.415891285584.2897.0877.5591.4
1e320.2165.129.21826939.6127316381061219.6
1f347.670.830.640008361601.524682282726.3
1g29864052709.631485593221912182334301.0
1h41.17.573.743465754853.4579.81401625.0
1i15.38.123.31912506.2853.9889.41038804.4
1j27.75.722.52047299823201234710.5176.8
4a369.58.466.93430888.2896.7841.3472.9723.2
4b1692755.3305.02497766.3184116961000809.3
AAZ250.012.825.640,000214324344149502
* Mean from 3 different assays, by a stopped flow technique (errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values).
Table
Table 3. Molecular docking free binding energies (kcal/mol) and interactions of tested compounds on hCA I, II and IX isoforms.
Table 3. Molecular docking free binding energies (kcal/mol) and interactions of tested compounds on hCA I, II and IX isoforms.
NohCA IsoformEstimated Free Binding Energy (Kcal/mol)Chelating the Zn (II) IonResidues Involved in H-Bond InteractionsResidues Involved in Hydrophobic Interactions
1dhCA I−10.35YesThr199Ala121,Leu198, Thr199, His200
hCA II−12.02YesThr199, Thr200Ile91,Val121, Phe131, Leu198, Trp209
hCA IX−8.53YesThr199Val121, Val131, Leu198
1ihCA I−12.45YesThr199Trp5, Ile60, Val62, His64, Leu198
hCA II−11.64YesThr199Val121, Leu198
hCA IX−12.74YesGlu67, Gln92, Thr199, His199Leu198, Thr200
4ahCA I−6.72No-Ala121, Leu198
hCA II−10.23YesThr199Ile91, Val121, Leu198, Thr200
hCA IX−6.57No-Val121, Leu198, Trp209
4bhCA I−5.11No-Leu198
hCA II−4.89No-Val121, Phe131, Leu198
hCA IX−6.26No-Val121, Leu198
AAZhCA I−8.28YesGln92Leu198, Thr199, His200, Pro201, Trp209
hCA II−8.87YesThr199, Thr200Val121, Phe131, Leu198, Trp209
hCA IX−9.02YesThr199, Thr200Val121, Val143, Val131, Leu198, Trp209
Table
Table 4. Drug likeness predictions of tested compounds.
Table 4. Drug likeness predictions of tested compounds.
NoMWNumber of HBA aNumber of HBD bLog Po/w
(iLOGP) c		Log S dTPSA eLipinskiBioavailability ScoreDrug-Likeness Model Score
1a444.89821.19Moderately soluble142.4000.550.70
1b492.93822.56Moderately soluble142.4000.550.58
1c506.96822.36Moderately soluble142.401 violation: MW > 5000.550.75
1d508.93932.33Moderately soluble162.631 violation: MW > 5000.550.42
1e534.97922.78Moderately soluble159.471 violation: MW > 5000.550.45
1f548.99922.68Moderately soluble159.471 violation: MW > 5000.550.47
1g639.07123192Poorly Soluble206.002 violations: MW > 500, NorO > 100.171.24
1h701.211023.58Poorly soluble201.842 violations: MW > 500, NorO > 100.171.19
1i715.23923.40Poorly soluble201.841 violation: MW > 5000.551.13
1j744.231133.44Poorly soluble230.942 violations: MW > 500, NorO > 100.171.12
4a514.501051.10Moderately soluble201.702 violations: MW > 500, NorO > 100.170.20
4b514.501051.15Moderately soluble201.702 violations: MW > 500, NorO > 100.170.13
a number of hydrogen bond acceptors; b number of hydrogen bond donors; c lipophilicity; d Water solubility (SILICOS-IT [S = Soluble]); e topological polar surface area (Å2).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Angeli, A.; Petrou, A.; Kartsev, V.; Lichitsky, B.; Komogortsev, A.; Capasso, C.; Geronikaki, A.; Supuran, C.T. Synthesis, Biological and In Silico Studies of Griseofulvin and Usnic Acid Sulfonamide Derivatives as Fungal, Bacterial and Human Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032802

AMA Style

Angeli A, Petrou A, Kartsev V, Lichitsky B, Komogortsev A, Capasso C, Geronikaki A, Supuran CT. Synthesis, Biological and In Silico Studies of Griseofulvin and Usnic Acid Sulfonamide Derivatives as Fungal, Bacterial and Human Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(3):2802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Angeli, Andrea, Anthi Petrou, Victor Kartsev, Boris Lichitsky, Andrey Komogortsev, Clemente Capasso, Athina Geronikaki, and Claudiu T. Supuran. 2023. "Synthesis, Biological and In Silico Studies of Griseofulvin and Usnic Acid Sulfonamide Derivatives as Fungal, Bacterial and Human Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 3: 2802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032802

APA Style

Angeli, A., Petrou, A., Kartsev, V., Lichitsky, B., Komogortsev, A., Capasso, C., Geronikaki, A., & Supuran, C. T. (2023). Synthesis, Biological and In Silico Studies of Griseofulvin and Usnic Acid Sulfonamide Derivatives as Fungal, Bacterial and Human Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(3), 2802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop