Next Article in Journal
The Ketogenic Diet in Colorectal Cancer: A Means to an End
Next Article in Special Issue
Rhizosphere Microbe Affects Soil Available Nitrogen and Its Implication for the Ecological Adaptability and Rapid Growth of Dendrocalamus sinicus, the Strongest Bamboo in the World
Previous Article in Journal
Isosinensetin Stimulates Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Secretion via Activation of hTAS2R50 and the Gβγ-Mediated Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low Specificity but Dissimilar Mycorrhizal Communities Associating with Roots May Contribute to the Spatial Pattern of Four Co-Occurring Habenaria (Orchidaceae) Species
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms24043680
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus on Sodium and Chloride Ion Channels of Casuarina glauca under Salt Stress

by
Yihan Wang
1,2,†,
Fengxin Dong
2,†,
Hui Chen
1,
Tingying Xu
3,* and
Ming Tang
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
3
Boone Pickens School of Geology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(4), 3680; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043680
Submission received: 24 December 2022 / Revised: 4 February 2023 / Accepted: 9 February 2023 / Published: 12 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Plant-Fungi Interactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Casuarina glauca is an important coastal protection forest species, which is exposed to high salt stress all year round. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can promote the growth and salt tolerance of C. glauca under salt stress. However, the effects of AMF on the distribution of Na+ and Cl− and the expression of related genes in C. glauca under salt stress need to be further explored. This study explored the effects of Rhizophagus irregularis on plant biomass, the distribution of Na+ and Cl−, and the expression of related genes in C. glauca under NaCl stress through pot simulation experiments. The results revealed that the mechanisms of Na+ and Cl− transport of C. glauca under NaCl stress were different. C. glauca took a salt accumulation approach to Na+, transferring Na+ from roots to shoots. Salt accumulation of Na+ promoted by AMF was associated with CgNHX7. The transport mechanism of C. glauca to Cl− might involve salt exclusion rather than salt accumulation, and Cl− was no longer transferred to shoots in large quantities but started to accumulate in roots. However, AMF alleviated Na+ and Cl− stress by similar mechanisms. AMF could promote salt dilution of C. glauca by increasing biomass and the content of K+, compartmentalizing Na+ and Cl− in vacuoles. These processes were associated with the expression of CgNHX1, CgNHX2-1, CgCLCD, CgCLCF, and CgCLCG. Our study will provide a theoretical basis for the application of AMF to improve salt tolerance in plants.

1. Introduction

Salt stress is one of the most severe abiotic stresses that the world is facing [1]. Approximately 800 million hectares of land and approximately 20% of irrigated land in the world are under some degree of salt stress [2,3]. The ionic toxicity of salt stress can induce osmotic stress in plants, leading to imbalanced nutrition and even plant death [4]. NaCl stress is one of the most extensive and damaging salt stresses [5,6]. However, halophytes can grow under high salt stress [7,8]. There are three methods related to their salt tolerance under salt stress. Salt exclusion is common in pseudohalophytes. Their roots rarely absorb salt or mainly accumulate the absorbed salt in the roots, so the ion concentration in the leaves is significantly lower than that in the roots within a certain concentration range [9,10]. Salt excretion is common in recretohalophytes. They have salt glands, which can actively secrete the absorbed salt to the surface of the stems and leaves for the rain to wash away [11]. Salt dilution is common in euhalophytes. They reduce salt concentration by rapidly growing cells to absorb water, increasing osmotic adjustment substances, and compartmentalizing salt in vacuoles [12,13]. It would be interesting to explore the mechanism of salt tolerance in these plants and then apply the insights gained to improve the yields of crops under salt stress.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with more than 90% of terrestrial plants and 80 to 90% of vascular plants [14]. AMF symbionts may be one of the most extensive beneficial interactions between plants and microorganisms [15], which occur naturally, even in salty environments where they promote the growth of mycorrhizal plants [16,17]. Mycorrhization can enhance the absorption of water and nutrients [18,19], the accumulation of osmotic adjustment substances, and the activity of antioxidant enzymes in plants [20]. Furthermore, mycorrhization can reduce the concentrations of salt ions in plants under salt stress [21,22]. Most studies have focused on investigating plant growth promotion upon mycorrhization under salt stress [23,24].
Casuarina glauca is native to Australia, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific islands, and was introduced to the southeast coastal areas of China in the 1950s [25]. Due to its tolerance to drought, infertile soil, salt, and sandstorms, C. glauca has become one of the main forest tree species in coastal zones by playing an irreplaceable role in windbreak and sand fixation. Hence, it helps to improve the ecological environment by providing materials [26,27]. As a coastal shelterbelt species, C. glauca is mainly exposed to Na+ and Cl− toxicity [28,29]. Djighaly et al. [30] found that C. glauca was more tolerant to NaCl stress than C. equisetifolia, and inoculation with AMF could improve the uptake of nutrients, such as N and P, and water uptake by C. glauca under NaCl stress. The results of Djighaly et al. [30] indicated that inoculation with AMF increased the growth of C. glauca under NaCl stress, with a positive effect on the diversity of herbaceous vegetation around it, which could be used to reduce the NaCl concentration in the soil. Our previous study also found that AMF inoculation under NaCl stress plays an important role in promoting growth, regulating ion balance, and changing the activity of antioxidant enzymes in C. glauca [31]. In addition, NHXs (Na+/H+ exchangers) and CLCs (the chloride channels), related to Na+ and Cl− transport, are also related to C. glauca’s NaCl tolerance [32,33].
NHXs play important roles in regulating ion homeostasis and cell growth [34]. They exchange H+ for Na+ or K+, thereby regulating monovalent cation homeostasis [35]. Arabidopsis thaliana contains eight NHX isoforms [36]. NHX1 to NHX4, located in the tonoplast, are associated with growth and vacuolar K+ homeostasis [37]. NHX5 and NHX6, which are located in the Golgi and trans-Golgi networks (TGNs), are thought to facilitate Na+ (K+)/H+ exchange [38] and growth [39]. NHX7 (salt overly sensitive 1, SOS1) and NHX8, which are located in the plasma membrane, are involved in Na+ (Li+)/H+ exchange, respectively transporting Na+ and Li+ out of the cell [40].
The CLC protein family, with its dual functions of NO3− and Cl− transport, plays an important role in salt tolerance and nutrient absorption [33]. A. thaliana contains seven CLC isoforms [41]. CLCA and CLCB, located in the tonoplast, are associated with NO3−/H+ exchange [42]. As a Cl− channel located in the tonoplast, CLCC plays an important role in regulating stomatal movement, anion homeostasis, and salt tolerance [43]. CLCD and CLCF are localized in Golgi membranes [41]. CLCD is associated with root growth as a Cl− channel [44]. CLCE, which targets the thylakoid membranes in chloroplasts, is related to photosynthesis [45]. Some authors have proposed that CLCF has the same function as CLCE [33], whereas others consider CLCF to be more similar to CLCD [46]. CLCG, located in the tonoplast, is considered to have the same function as CLCC [47].
Most studies on AMF and salt stress have focused on the distribution of Na+ and the expression of related genes. The effects of AMF on the distribution of both Na+ and Cl−, and the expression of related genes need to be further explored. This study has three aims:
  • To explore the influence of mycorrhization on the growth and distribution of Na+ and Cl−.
  • To explore the influence of mycorrhization on the gene expression of the CgNHX and CgCLC families.
  • To explore whether these genes are related to Na+ and Cl− distribution.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Rhizophagus irregularis on Mycorrhizal Colonization and Plant Biomass under NaCl Stress

Figure S1 shows the colonization of arbuscule, hypha, vesicle, and spore in mycorrhizal C. glauca under NaCl stress. With a change in NaCl concentration from 0 to 600 mM, arbuscular colonization decreased from 39% to 14%, vesicle and spore colonization increased from 34% to 57%, and hyphal colonization exhibited no significant change.
Under NaCl stress, the biomass of C. glauca differed between plants with R. irregularis inoculation and those without. Figure S2 shows that NaCl stress inhibited the growth of C. glauca and R. irregularis inoculation alleviated this inhibition (Figure S2a). NaCl stress reduced the fresh weight, ground diameter, and height of C. glauca (Figure S2b–d). The inoculation with R. irregularis could promote the growth of C. glauca regardless of the presence of NaCl stress, specifically by increasing the fresh weight, plant height, and ground diameter of C. glauca (Figure S2b–d). These results show that R. irregularis inoculation can promote the growth and salt tolerance of C. glauca under NaCl stress.

2.2. Effect of R. irregularis on Na+, K+, and Cl− Status under NaCl Stress

The effects of R. irregularis inoculation on the Na+ and Cl− contents under NaCl stress were consistent, and both were increased. Therefore, the contents in the soil were reduced (Figure 1a–d). The Na+ and Cl− concentrations of C. glauca were increased by NaCl stress. Instead, under NaCl stress, inoculation with R. irregularis decreased the Na+ and Cl− concentrations of shoots and roots (Figure 1e,f). The K+ content of C. glauca was reduced by NaCl stress, but inoculation with R. irregularis increased the K+ content of shoots and roots under NaCl stress (Figure 1g). The Na+/K+ of C. glauca was increased by NaCl stress. Nevertheless, under NaCl stress, R. irregularis inoculation decreased the Na+/K+ of shoots and roots by 8% and 24%, respectively (Figure 1h).
The effects of NaCl stress on the TF of Na+ and Cl− were different, increasing the TF of Na+ but decreasing that of Cl−. The effects of R. irregularis inoculation on the Na+ and Cl− TF under NaCl stress were consistent, and both were increased (Figure 2).

2.3. Effect of R. irregularis on Gs and Tr under NaCl Stress

To explore whether the increase of TF of Na+ and Cl− caused by R. irregularis inoculation is related to stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (Tr), we investigated the effect of R. irregularis on Gs and Tr under NaCl Stress. The results showed that NaCl stress decreased Gs and Tr. Under NaCl stress, compared with no inoculation, inoculation with R. irregularis increased Gs and Tr by 31% and 26%, respectively. (Figure 3).

2.4. Effect of R. irregularis on Expression of CgNHXs and CgCLCs under NaCl Stress

To explore whether the effect of R. irregularis inoculation on Na+, K+, and Cl− status is related to Na+ and Cl− transport-related genes, we determined the expression of CgNHXs and CgCLCs.
A total of five full-length CgNHX genes and five full-length CgCLC genes were obtained by cloning. These full-length translated protein sequences were compared with NHX and CLC proteins of known species such as Arabidopsis thaliana and Zea mays, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed to initially determine their potential functions. As shown in Figure 4a, the five NHX proteins were divided into three branches. Among them, CgNHX1, CgNHX2-1, and CgNHX2-2 were classified into the same branch with a closer affinity to AtNHX1 and AtNHX2. CgNHX6 was classified into the second branch with closer affinity to AtNHX6. CgNHX7 was classified into the third branch with a closer affinity to AtNHX7. As shown in Figure 4b, the five CLC proteins were divided into four branches. Among them, CgCLCB was divided into the first branch, which is more closely related to AtCLCB. CgCLCC and CgCLCG were divided into the second branch, which is more closely related to AtCLCC and AtCLCG. CgCLCD was divided into the third branch, which is more closely related to AtCLCD. CgCLCF was divided into the fourth branch, which is more closely related to AtCLCF.
The patterns of CgNHX expression differed between shoots and roots. In shoots, the expression of CgNHX1 and CgNHX2-1 was upregulated by R. irregularis inoculation. The expression of CgNHX2-2 and CgNHX6 was upregulated by NaCl stress but downregulated by R. irregularis inoculation under NaCl stress. In addition, the expression of CgNHX7 was downregulated by NaCl stress. In roots, the expression of CgNHX1, CgNHX2-1, and CgNHX2-2 was upregulated by R. irregularis inoculation under NaCl stress. The expression of CgNHX6 was upregulated by NaCl stress. Under NaCl stress, the expression of CgNHX7 was upregulated by R. irregularis inoculation (Figure 5).
The patterns of CgCLC expression differed between shoots and roots. In shoots, the expression of CgCLCB was downregulated by NaCl stress. The expression of CgCLCC was upregulated by NaCl stress but downregulated by R. irregularis inoculation under NaCl stress. In addition, the expression of CgCLCD, CgCLCF, and CgCLCG was upregulated by R. irregularis inoculation under NaCl stress. In roots, the expression of CgCLCB and CgCLCD was downregulated by NaCl stress, whereas the expression of CgCLCC, CgCLCF, and CgCLCG was upregulated by NaCl stress. R. irregularis inoculation downregulated the expression of CgCLCC but upregulated CgCLCF and CgCLCG under NaCl stress (Figure 5).

2.5. Correlation Analysis of Gene Expression and Physiological Indicators of C. glauca under NaCl Stress

To explore the correlation between the effect of R. irregularis inoculation on physiological indicators and the Na+, Cl− transport-related genes under NaCl stress, we did a correlation analysis between them under salt stress.
Opposite to CgNHX6, the correlation analysis results of the expression of CgNHX1 in shoots and roots and CgNHX2-2 in roots were all positively correlated with mycorrhizal colonization, biomass, and the content of Na+, K+, except that the expression of CgNHX1 in shoots was negatively correlated with the concentration of Na+ and that in roots was negatively correlated with Na+/K+. The expression of CgNHX2-1 in shoots was positively correlated with mycorrhizal colonization and the content of K+, and that in roots was only positively correlated with mycorrhizal colonization. The expression of CgNHX7 in roots was positively correlated with mycorrhizal colonization and biomass but was negatively correlated with the concentration of Na+, the content of Na+ in soil, and Na+/K+ (Figure 6).
Correlation analysis showed that the expression of CgCLCB in shoots was positively correlated with the concentration of Cl− and negatively correlated with the TF of Cl−. However, the expression of CgCLCC in shoots was positively correlated with the concentration of Cl− and negatively correlated with other indicators, which was the opposite of the expression of CgCLCD in shoots. The expression of CgCLCC in roots was negatively correlated with mycorrhizal colonization, fresh weight, and Cl− content. Both the expression of CgCLCF in shoots and roots were positively correlated with fresh weight and the content of Cl−. In addition, the expression of CgCLCF in roots was also positively correlated with mycorrhizal colonization. The correlation analysis results of CgCLCF in roots were consistent with those of CgCLCG in roots (Figure 6).

3. Discussion

3.1. Effects of R. irregularis Inoculation and NaCl Stress on Colonization and Biomass

Salt stress inhibited plant growth and AMF growth in the same way [48,49]. Soil salinity had a negative correlation with the intensity of mycorrhizal colonization on the one hand, and a positive correlation with spore density on the other hand. We believed that these results reflect the assistance of R. irregularis to plants resisting NaCl stress [22]. Sporulation was considered as a resistance behavior exhibited by mycorrhization against high salt concentrations [21].
The most significant and common effect of salt on plants is growth inhibition, since plants need to absorb water and ions to maintain osmotic pressure, synthesize osmotic adjustment substances, and compartmentalize harmful ions to survive. These processes require energy, resulting in less energy required for growth and lower biomass [50,51]. AMF could increase energy by enhancing the ability of plants to absorb water, synthesize osmotic adjustment substances, and compartmentalize harmful ions, thereby promoting plant growth [52,53]. Additionally, we regarded the significant increase of C. glauca biomass caused by R. irregularis inoculation as an important indicator of the ability of plants to tolerate salinity stress [53,54].

3.2. Effects of R. irregularis Inoculation and NaCl Stress on Na+, K+, and Cl− Uptake

Many studies have focused only on the tolerance mechanism of Na+ under salt stress, and have assumed that Na+ can represent NaCl. However, our results showed that the change trends of Na+ and Cl− TF were different under NaCl stress, reflecting the different salt tolerance mechanisms of the two. For Na+, the Na+ TF increased under NaCl stress, which meant that the tolerance mechanism of Na+ in C. glauca might be salt accumulation, and hence a large amount of Na+ accumulated in the shoots [55,56]. The shoots were then protected by salt dilution, increasing tissue water content, or compartmentalizing Na+ to the vacuole [13,57]. However, for Cl−, the TF of Cl− was significantly decreased under NaCl stress. At the same time, the Cl− content in shoots was still greater than in roots. This meant that under the stress of 600 mM NaCl, the tolerance mechanism of C. glauca to Cl− might involve salt exclusion rather than salt accumulation [58]. Perhaps Cl− is more toxic to shoots than Na+ for C. glauca, or the concentration of Cl− in shoots reaches the tolerance threshold, but Na+ concentration does not [59,60].
Although the mechanisms of C. glauca tolerance to Na+ and Cl− were different, the mitigation mechanisms of R. irregularis inoculation to their stress were similar. The upward transport of Na+ and Cl− improved by AMF was caused by transpiration flow in plants under salt stress [61]. The transpiration flow was caused by increases in Gs and Tr, which were attributed to R. irregularis inoculation. AMF could promote salt dilution of halophytes by increasing plant biomass and the content of osmotic adjustment substances, compartmentalizing Na+ and Cl− [62,63]. Due to the increase in biomass caused by R. irregularis inoculation, mycorrhizal C. glauca could simultaneously maintain high contents and low concentrations of Na+ and Cl−. This is a common feature of AMF-associated plants under salt stress [26,64]. Compared with nonmycorrhizal C. glauca, mycorrhizal C. glauca absorbed larger amounts of Na+ and Cl− from the soil but maintained lower concentrations of Na+ and Cl− to protect themselves from excessive damage. Meanwhile, mycorrhizal plants had lower Na+/K+ to regulate the dynamic equilibrium of ions and improve salt tolerance [65,66]. Therefore, even if increased Gs and Tr promotes the upward transport of Na+ and Cl−, the mycorrhizal C. glauca does not suffer severe ion damage.

3.3. Effects of R. irregularis Inoculation and NaCl Stress on Gene Expression

Roots are the first plant part to be stressed during salt stress. The AM symbiosis increased the saline stress tolerance of Robinia pseudoacacia through the upregulation of SOS1/NHX7 in roots, which enhanced the exclusion of Na+ from root cells [67]. This indicated that R. irregularis inoculation promoted Na+ efflux from roots and prevented Na+ poisoning. Meanwhile, R. irregularis inoculation decreased the Na+ content in the soil and increased TF of Na+, implying that possibly that most of the Na+ efflux in roots upon induction of CgNHX7 by R. irregularis inoculation was transferred to the shoots rather than the soil. Meanwhile, under NaCl stress, the expression of CgNHX7 decreased in shoots but increased in roots. This is consistent with our previous notion (see above) that R. irregularis inoculation might promote the salt accumulation of Na+ in shoots. We mentioned earlier that AMF could promote salt dilution of halophytes by increasing plant biomass and the content of osmotic adjustment substances, compartmentalizing Na+.
So, are these processes co-regulated with the expression of CgNHXs?, since vacuolar NHXs, NHX1 and NHX2 could promote the transport of Na+ to vacuoles [53]. Hence, the upregulation of CgNHX1 and CgNHX2-1 caused by R. irregularis inoculation might have alleviated the inhibitory effects of Na+ by transporting it to vacuoles. Furthermore, similar to our correlation analysis results, NHX1 and NHX2 had the same functions in growth-promoting and the stabilization of K+ in vacuoles [35,68]. Therefore, the upregulation of CgNHX1 and CgNHX2-1 by R. irregularis inoculation might not only increase the biomass of mycorrhizal C. glauca to reduce Na+ toxicity by bio-dilution, but also stabilize the cellular environment by increasing the K+ content in shoots and roots.
Which CgCLCs can mycorrhizal C. glauca use for salt dilution? The expression of CgCLCC in C. glauca under NaCl stress was higher than in those without NaCl stress treatment, and plants with high Cl− toxicity protect themselves by upregulating the expression of CLCC to transport Cl− into vacuoles [69]. Another CLC gene, AtCLCG, is involved in salt tolerance by altering Cl− homeostasis in mesophyll cells and Cl− compartmentalization into the vacuole. This gene is co-expressed with AtCLCC in guard cells during stomatal regulation [47]. Although R. irregularis inoculation downregulated CgCLCC under salt stress, it upregulated CgCLCG, which might promote the transfer of Cl− into mesophyll cell vacuoles, thereby improving tolerance of mycorrhizal C. glauca against NaCl stress, and promoting its growth. In addition, CLCD, an anion transporter involved in compartments and trafficking, might be related to growth and Cl− transfer into the trans-Golgi network [33]. The function of another CLC gene, CgCLCF, might be similar to that of CgCLCD, which was correlated with Cl− transport and growth. The increase in biomass and Cl− compartmentalization upon R. irregularis inoculation might have been related to CgCLCD and CgCLCF induction.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Design and Materials

This study was a two-factor experiment: NaCl stress (0 mM NaCl and 600 mM NaCl) and AMF inoculation (no inoculation with AMF and inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularis). There were four treatments, and three biological replicates for each treatment. Each replicate contained 12 pots, for a total of 144 pots.
C. glauca seeds were sterilized and germinated into seedlings, and the best-growing plant was selected from the seedlings to prepare a batch of tissue culture seedlings, which were used as experimental materials [31]. R. irregularis was multiplied by Lycopersicon esculentum Mill and then triturated, and 40 g of inoculum was added to each pot for R. irregularis inoculation treatment, and 40 g of sterilized inoculum was added to each pot for no AMF treatment. Seedlings were grown in greenhouse at temperatures ranging from 25–35 °C and relative humidity ranging from 50–70%.

4.2. Plant Harvest

The stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) were measured with a Li-6400 portable open flow gas-exchange system (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) between 8:30 to 11:30 a.m. The method and parameter settings were those of Sheng et al. [70].
After the shoots were weighed for total fresh weight, they were divided into three parts. The first part was used to calculate the water content, the second was used for elemental concentration determination, and the third was used to extract RNA. After weighing the total fresh weight of roots, the grouping and uses were the same as those of shoots, except that a part was separated to measure AMF colonization.

4.3. Mycorrhizal Colonization

Refer to Phillips and Hayman [71] and Giovannetti and Mosse [72] for the determination method of AMF colonization.

4.4. Plant Biomass and Water Content

The total fresh weight of shoots and roots was weighed at harvest time. The plant height was measured with a tape measure, and the ground diameter was measured with a digital caliper (Hengliang, Shanghai, China). The part of the sample used to measure the water content was weighed fresh and then dried at 65 °C after fixation at 105 °C to measure the dry weight. The water content was calculated using the dry and fresh weights. Total dry weight was calculated using water content and total fresh weight.

4.5. Na+, K+, and Cl− Status

After being ground, the part of the sample used to measure the Na+ and K+ concentration was extracted with HNO3 and a microwave digestion instrument (Milestone ETHOS, Milan, Italy). The elements were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The measurement method of Cl− concentration was that of Matsushita and Matoh [73] and Zhan et al. [74]. The contents of the elements were calculated by the concentration and total dry weight. The extraction method of elements in the soil was that of Bao [75]. The method for measuring elements in soil was the same as above. The transfer factor (TF) of Na+ and Cl− was obtained by dividing the shoot content by the root content.

4.6. RNA Extraction, Complementary DNA (cDNA) Synthesis, and Determination of Gene Expression via Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT–PCR)

RNA extraction used the E.Z.N.A Plant RNA Kit R6827-01 (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). RNA quality check used 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop 2000 instrument (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Reverse transcription of RNA was done using the TIANScript RT Kit (TIANGEN Bio, Beijing, China) to obtain cDNA. The sequences of CgNHXs and CgCLCs were obtained from the assembly of the C. glauca transcriptome sequenced by Illumina HiSeq technology (PRJNA690646). The full-length gene was cloned using the SMARTer® RACE 5′/3′ Kit (Takara Bio, Beijing, China). The primers used for qRT–PCR were designed with the NCBI Primer-BLAST tool (Table S1). qRT–PCR was conducted using a CF96X real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The specific reaction system and steps were consistent with previous research [31]. There were three biological replicates for each treatment, and two technical replicates for each biological replicate. The relative quantity of transcripts was determined using the 2 − Δ Δ C T method [76].

4.7. Statistical Analyses

SPSS 26 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) was used for statistical analyses. All data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and post hoc comparisons (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05, n = 3). Figures were constructed with Origin 2020 (Origin Lab, Northampton, MA, USA.). The phylogenetic tree was plotted using ITOL (https://itol.embl.de/itol.cgi, accessed on 19 January 2023).

5. Conclusions

Under NaCl stress, the tolerance mechanisms of C. glauca to Na+ and Cl− were different. For Na+, salt accumulation was adopted, and Na+ absorbed from the soil was transferred from roots to shoots. This process was promoted by R. irregularis inoculation and was related to Gs, Tr, and CgNHX7 expression. The Cl− tolerance mechanism involved salt exclusion, and Cl− absorbed from soil was no longer transferred to shoots in large quantities but started accumulating in roots. However, the mechanism of R. irregularis inoculation alleviating Na+ and Cl− stress was similar, promoting growth, increasing osmotic adjustment substances, and ionic compartmentalization. Therefore, mycorrhizal C. glauca could not only absorb large amounts of Na+ and Cl− from the soil to remediate it but also mitigate Na+ and Cl− stress in plants. The process of R. irregularis inoculation alleviating Na+ and Cl− stress was correlated with the expression of CgNHX1, CgNHX2-1, and CgCLCD, CgCLCF, CgCLCG. Future studies may focus on the specific effects of R. irregularis inoculation on these genes and the detailed Na+ and Cl− transfer pathways in C. glauca under NaCl exposure.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24043680/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W. and T.X.; methodology and investigation, Y.W. and F.D.; data curation, Y.W. and F.D.; writing-original draft preparation, Y.W. and T.X.; writing-review and editing, T.X.; supervision and project administration, M.T. and H.C.; funding acquisition, M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32071639; the Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture Project, grant number NZ2021025; and the Key Projects of Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan, grant number 201904020022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Chonglu Zhong from the Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, the Chinese Academy of Forestry, for providing the seeds of C. glauca.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahmad, P.; Jaleel, C.A.; Salem, M.A.; Nabi, G.; Sharma, S. Roles of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2010, 30, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cirilloa, V.; Masinb, R.; Maggioa, A.; Zanin, G. Crop-weed interactions in saline environments. Eur. J. Agron. 2018, 99, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Singh, H.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, A.; Kyriacou, M.; Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y. Grafting tomato as a tool to improve salt tolerance. Agronomy 2020, 10, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.H.; Liu, C.; Chen, F.J.; Yang, T.W.; Ma, K.S.; Zhang, Y. Trichoderma harzianum mitigates salt stress in cucumber via multiple responses. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 170, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wei, X.; Yan, X.; Yang, Z.; Han, G.; Wang, L.; Yuan, F.; Wang, B. Salt glands of recretohalophyte Tamarix under salinity: Their evolution and adaptation. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 9384–9395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wei, L.; Zhao, H.Y.; Wang, B.X.; Wu, X.Y.; Lan, R.J.; Huang, X.; Chen, B.; Chen, G.; Jiang, C.Q.; Wang, J.L.; et al. Exogenous melatonin improves the growth of rice seedlings by regulating redox balance and ion homeostasis under salt stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 41, 2108–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hassan, M.A.; Estrelles, E.; Soriano, P.; López-Gresa, M.P.; Bellés, J.M.; Boscaiu, M.; Vicente, O. Unraveling salt tolerance mechanisms in halophytes: A comparative study on four mediterranean Limonium species with different geographic distribution patterns. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bueno, M.; Cordovilla, M.P. Polyamines in Halophytes. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhao, K.F.; Song, J.; Feng, G.; Zhao, M.; Liu, J.P. Species, types, distribution, and economic potential of halophytes in China. Plant Soil 2010, 342, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Matinzadeh, Z.; Akhani, H.; Abedi, M.; Palacio, S. The elemental composition of halophytes correlates with key morphological adaptations and taxonomic groups. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 141, 259–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ding, F.; Yang, J.C.; Yuan, F.; Wang, B.S. Progress in mechanism of salt excretion in recretohalopytes. Front. Biol. 2010, 5, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Balnokin, Y.V.; Myasoedov, N.A.; Shamsutdinov, Z.S.; Shamsutdinov, N.Z. Significance of Na+ and K+ for sustained hydration of organ tissues in ecologically distinct halophytes of the family Chenopodiaceae. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 52, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Song, J.; Wang, B.S. Using euhalophytes to understand salt tolerance and to develop saline agriculture: Suaeda salsa as a promising model. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Feng, Y.Z.; Cui, X.C.; He, S.Y.; Dong, G.; Chen, M.; Wang, J.H.; Lin, X.G. The role of metal nanoparticles in influencing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi effects on plant growth. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 9496–9504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dowarah, B.; Gill, S.S.; Agarwala, N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in conferring tolerance to biotic stresses in plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 41, 1429–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gavito, M.E.; Jakobsen, I.; Mikkelsen, T.N.; Mora, F. Direct evidence for modulation of photosynthesis by an arbuscular mycorrhiza-induced carbon sink strength. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 896–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Diagne, N.; Ngom, M.; Djighaly, P.I.; Fall, D.; Hocher, V.; Svistoonoff, S. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant growth and performance: Importance in biotic and abiotic stressed regulation. Diversity 2020, 12, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, Y.R.; Tang, M.; Sulpice, R.; Chen, H.; Tian, S.; Ban, Y.H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter fractal dimension characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings through regulating plant growth, leaf water status, photosynthesis, and nutrient concentration under drought stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 612–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, F.; Zhang, H.Q.; Fang, F.R.; Wu, N.; Zhang, Y.X.; Tang, M. Effects of nitrogen and exogenous Rhizophagus irregularis on the nutrient status, photosynthesis and leaf anatomy of Populus  ×  canadensis ‘Neva’. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 36, 824–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Feldmane, D.; Druva-Lūsīte, I.; Pole, V.; Butac, M.M.; Militaru, M.; Missa, I.; Meiere, D.; Rubauskis, E. Rhizophagus irregularis MUCL 41,833 association with green cuttings of Prunus sp. rootstocks. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 40, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Selvakumar, G.; Shagol, C.C.; Kim, K.; Han, S.; Sa, T. Spore associated bacteria regulates maize root K+/Na+ ion homeostasis to promote salinity tolerance during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chebaane, A.; Symanczik, S.; Oehl, F.; Azri, R.; Gargouri, M.; Mäder, P.; Mliki, A.; Fki, L. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Phoenix dactylifera L. grown in Tunisian Sahara oases of different salinity levels. Symbiosis 2020, 81, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lenoir, I.; Fontaine, J.; Sahraoui, A.L.H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal responses to abiotic stresses: A review. Phytochemistry 2016, 123, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vives-Peris, V.; Ollas, C.d.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Pérez-Clemente, R.M. Root exudates: From plant to rhizosphere and beyond. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shan, Q.H.; Zhang, J.F.; Sun, S.Y.; Chen, G.C.; Zhang, H.D.; Shen, L.M. Construction of coastline shelterbelts and assessment of their environmental effects in Yuyao, China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 2428–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Djighaly, P.I.; Diagne, N.; Ngom, M.; Ngom, D.; Hocher, V.; Fall, D.; Diouf, D.; Laplaze, L.; Svistoonoff, S.; Champion, A. Selection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal strains to improve Casuarina equisetifolia L. and Casuarina glauca Sieb. tolerance to salinity. Ann. For. Sci. 2018, 75, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ye, G.F.; Zhang, H.X.; Chen, B.H.; Nie, S.; Liu, H.; Gao, W.; Wang, H.Y.; Gao, Y.B.; Gu, L.F. De novo genome assembly of the stress tolerant forest species Casuarina equisetifolia provides insight into secondary growth. Plant J. 2019, 97, 779–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fan, C.; Qiu, Z.; Zeng, B.; Li, X.; Xu, S.H. Physiological adaptation and gene expression analysis of Casuarina equisetifolia under salt stress. Biol. Plant. 2018, 62, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vikashini, B.; Shanthi, A.; Dasgupta, M.G. Identification and expression profiling of genes governing lignin biosynthesis in Casuarina equisetifolia L. Gene 2018, 676, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Djighaly, P.I.; Ngom, D.; Diagne, N.; Fall, D.; Ngom, M.; Diouf, D.; Hocher, V.; Laplaze, L.; Champion, A.; Farrant, J.M.; et al. Effect of Casuarina plantations inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Frankia on the diversity of herbaceous vegetation in saline environments in senegal. Diversity 2020, 12, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.H.; Dong, F.X.; Tang, M. Transcriptome analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal Casuarina glauca in damage mitigation of roots on NaCl stress. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ayadi, M.; Martins, V.; Ayed, R.B.; Jbir, R.; Feki, M.; Mzid, R.; Géros, H.; Aifa, S.; Hanana, M. Genome wide identification, molecular characterization, and gene expression analyses of grapevine NHX antiporters suggest their involvement in growth, ripening, seed dormancy, and stress response. Biochem. Genet. 2020, 58, 102–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Subba, A.; Tomar, S.; Pareek, A.; Singla-Pareek, S.L. The chloride channels: Silently serving the plants. Physiol. Plant 2020, 171, 688–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gradogna, A.; Scholz-Starke, J.; Pardo, J.M.; Carpaneto, A. Beyond the patch-clamp resolution: Functional activity of non-electrogenic vacuolar NHX proton/potassium antiporters and inhibition by phosphoinositides. New Phytol. 2020, 229, 3026–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bassil, E.; Zhang, S.Q.; Gong, H.J.; Tajima, H.; Blumwald, E. Cation specificity of vacuolar NHX-type cation/H+ antiporters. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 616–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cui, J.Q.; Hua, Y.P.; Zhou, T.; Liu, Y.; Huang, J.Y.; Yue, C.P. Global landscapes of the Na+/H+ antiporter (NHX) family members uncover their potential roles in regulating the rapeseed resistance to salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, S.Q.; Tajima, H.; Nambara, E.; Blumwald, E.; Bassil, E. Auxin homeostasis and distribution of the auxin efflux carrier PIN2 require vacuolar NHX-type cation/H+ antiporter activity. Plants 2020, 9, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhu, X.J.; Pan, T.; Zhang, X.; Fan, L.G.; Quintero, F.J.; Zhao, H.; Su, X.M.; Li, X.; Villalta, I.; Mendoza, I.; et al. K+ efflux antiporters 4, 5, and 6 mediate pH and K+ homeostasis in endomembrane compartments. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 1657–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lv, S.S.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.J.; Fan, L.G.; Xu, Y.L.; Zhao, Y.J.; Xie, H.C.; Sawchuk, M.G.; Scarpella, E.; et al. Arabidopsis NHX5 and NHX6 regulate PIN6-mediated auxin homeostasis and growth. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 255, 153305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sze, H.; Chanroj, S. Plant endomembrane dynamics: Studies of K+/H+ antiporters provide insights on the effects of pH and ion homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 875–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Liu, C.Y.; Zhao, Y.J.; Zhao, X.Q.; Dong, J.M.; Yuan, Z.H. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the CLC gene family in pomegranate (Punica granatum) reveals its roles in salt resistance. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wei, Q.J.; Gu, Q.Q.; Wang, N.N.; Yang, C.Q.; Peng, S.A. Molecular cloning and characterization of the chloride channel gene family in trifoliate orange. Biol. Plant. 2015, 59, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jossier, M.; Kroniewicz, L.; Dalmas, F.; Thiec, D.L.; Ephritikhine, G.; Thomine, S.; BarbierBrygoo, H.; Vavasseur, A.; Filleur, S.; Leonhardt, N. The Arabidopsis vacuolar anion transporter, AtCLCc, is involved in the regulation of stomatal movements and contributes to salt tolerance. Plant J. 2010, 64, 563–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fecht-Bartenbach, J.v.d.; Bogner, M.; Krebs, M.; Stierhof, Y.-D.; Schumacher, K.; Ludewig, U. Function of the anion transporter AtCLC-d in the trans-Golgi network. Plant J. 2007, 50, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nedelyaeva, O.I.; Shuvalov, A.V.; Balnokin, Y.V. Chloride channels and transporters of the CLC family in plants. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 67, 767–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Angeli, A.D.; Monachello, D.; Ephritikhine, G.; Frachisse, J.M.; Thomine, S.; Gambale, F.; Barbier-Brygoo, H. CLC-mediated anion transport in plant cells. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nguyen, C.T.; Agorio, A.; Jossier, M.; Depre, S.; Thomine, S.; Filleur, S. Characterization of the chloride channel-like, AtCLCg, involved in chloride tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 764–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, C.G.; Dai, Z.; Cui, M.Y.; Lu, W.K.; Sun, H.W. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate boron toxicity in Puccinellia tenuiflora under the combined stresses of salt and drought. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bharti, A.; Garg, N. SA and AM symbiosis modulate antioxidant defense mechanisms and asada pathway in chickpea genotypes under salt stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 178, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Romero-Munar, A.; Baraza, E.; Gulías, J.; Cabot, C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi confer salt tolerance in giant reed (Arundo donax L.) plants grown under low phosphorus by reducing leaf Na+ concentration and improving phosphorus use efficiency. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Dell’Aversana, E.; Hessini, K.; Woodrow, P.; Ciarmiello, L.F.; Ferchichi, S.; Fusco, G.M.; Abdelly, C.; Carillo, P. Salinity duration differently modulates physiological parameters and metabolites profile in roots of two contrasting barley genotypes. Plants 2021, 10, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lin, Y.H.; Wang, C.L.; Chiu, J.Y. Proteomic studies in the symbiotic associations between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Funneliformis mosseae with melon (Cucumis melo L.) under salt conditions. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2021, 20, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Santander, C.; Aroca, R.; Cartes, P.; Vidal, G.; Cornejo, P. Aquaporins and cation transporters are differentially regulated by two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi strains in lettuce cultivars growing under salinity conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 158, 396–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Parvin, S.; Geel, M.V.; Yeasmin, T.; Verbruggen, E.; Honnay, O. Effects of single and multiple species inocula of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the salinity tolerance of a Bangladeshi rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar. Mycorrhiza 2020, 30, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rozentsvet, O.; Nesterov, V.; Bogdanova, E.; Kosobryukhov, A.; Subova, S.; Semenova, G. Structural and molecular strategy of photosynthetic apparatus organisation of wild flora halophytes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 129, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ma, F.L.; Barrett-Lennard, E.G.; Tian, C.Y. Changes in cell size and tissue hydration (‘succulence’) cause curvilinear growth responses to salinity and watering treatments in euhalophytes. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 159, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, D.Y.; Wang, H.Y.; Han, B.; Wang, B.; Guo, A.P.; Zheng, D.; Liu, C.J.; Chang, L.L.; Peng, M.; Wang, X.C. Sodium instead of potassium and chloride is an important macronutrient to improve leaf succulence and shoot development for halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 51, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Krishnamurthy, P.; Jyothi-Prakash, P.A.; Qin, L.; He, J.; Lin, Q.s.; Loh, C.S.; Kumar, P.P. Role of root hydrophobic barriers in salt exclusion of a mangrove plant Avicennia officinalis. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1656–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Munns, R.; Teste, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Scagel, C.F.; Bryla, D.R.; Lee, J. Salt exclusion and mycorrhizal symbiosis increase tolerance to NaCl and CaCl2 salinity in ‘Siam queen’ basil. HortScience 2017, 52, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Nada, R.M.; Khedr, A.H.A.; Serag, M.S.; El-Qashlan, N.R.; Abogadallah, G.M. Molecular and physiological responses of naturally grown Atriplex halimus L. to drought-stress recovery in the absence or presence of Na+ ions under natural conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 41, 1578–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jia, T.T.; Wang, J.; Chang, W.; Fan, X.X.; Sui, X.; Song, F.Q. Proteomics analysis of E. angustifolia seedlings inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Pan, J.; Peng, F.; Tedeschi, A.; Xue, X.; Wang, T.; Liao, J.; Zhang, W.J.; Huang, C.H. Do halophytes and glycophytes differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress? A meta-analysis. Bot. Stud. 2020, 61, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Talaat, N.B.; Shawky, B.T. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on yield, nutrients, organic solutes, and antioxidant enzymes of two wheat cultivars under salt stress. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil Sci. 2011, 174, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Han, X.; Wang, Y.Y.; Cheng, K.; Zhang, H.Q.; Tang, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and exogenous potassium application improved Lycium barbarum salt tolerance. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 41, 2980–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Evelin, H.; Devi, T.S.; Gupta, S.; Kapoor, R. Mitigation of salinity stress in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: Current understanding and new challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, J.; Zhang, H.Q.; Zhang, X.L.; Tang, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alleviates salt stress in black locust through improved photosynthesis, water status, and K+/Na+ homeostasis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bassil, E.; Tajima, H.; Liang, Y.C.; Ohto, M.-a.; Ushijim, K.; Nakano, R.; Esumi, T.; Coku, A.; Belmonte, M.; Blumwal, E. The Arabidopsis Na+/H+ antiporters NHX1 and NHX2 control vacuolar pH and K+ homeostasis to regulate growth, flower development, and reproduction. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3482–3497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hu, R.B.; Zhu, Y.F.; Wei, J.; Chen, J.; Shi, H.Z.; Shen, G.X.; Zhang, H. Overexpression of PP2A-C5 that encodes the catalytic subunit 5 of protein phosphatase 2A in Arabidopsis confers better root and shoot development under salt conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 150–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sheng, M.; Tang, M.; Chen, H.; Yang, B.W.; Zhang, F.F.; Huang, Y.H. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 2008, 18, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Giovannetti, M.; Mosse, B. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 1980, 84, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Matsushita, N.; Matoh, T. Characterization of Na+ exclusion mechanisms of salt-tolerant reed plants in comparison with salt-sensitive rice plants. Physiol. Plant. 1991, 83, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhan, X.C.; Li, C.R.; Li, Z.Y.; Yang, X.C.; Zhong, S.G.; Yi, T. Highly Accurate Nephelometric Titrimetry. J. Pharm. Sci. 2004, 93, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Bao, S.D. Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis, 3rd ed.; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  76. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 − Δ Δ C T method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 03680 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of R. irregularis on Na+, K+, and Cl− status under NaCl stress. (a) The content of Na+ in C. glauca. (b) The content of Na+ in soil. (c): The content of Cl− in C. glauca. (d) The content of Cl− in soil. (e) The concentration of Na+ in C. glauca. (f) The concentration of Cl− in C. glauca. (g) The content of K+ in C. glauca. (h) The Na+/K+ of C. glauca. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, inoculated with R. irregularis; 0, no NaCl stress; 600, 600 mM NaCl stress. The data are the means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different capital letters indicate significant differences between means at the p < 0.05 level by Tukey’s test. Data of roots from Wang et al. [31] in the same project.
Figure 1. Effect of R. irregularis on Na+, K+, and Cl− status under NaCl stress. (a) The content of Na+ in C. glauca. (b) The content of Na+ in soil. (c): The content of Cl− in C. glauca. (d) The content of Cl− in soil. (e) The concentration of Na+ in C. glauca. (f) The concentration of Cl− in C. glauca. (g) The content of K+ in C. glauca. (h) The Na+/K+ of C. glauca. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, inoculated with R. irregularis; 0, no NaCl stress; 600, 600 mM NaCl stress. The data are the means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different capital letters indicate significant differences between means at the p < 0.05 level by Tukey’s test. Data of roots from Wang et al. [31] in the same project.
Ijms 24 03680 g001
Ijms 24 03680 g002 550
Figure 2. The transfer factor (TF) of Na+ and Cl− in C. glauca under different treatments. (a) The TF of Na+ in C. glauca. (b) The TF of Cl− in C. glauca. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, inoculated with R. irregularis; 0, no NaCl stress; 600, 600 mM NaCl stress. The data are the means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different capital letters indicate significant differences between means at the p < 0.05 level by Tukey’s test.
Figure 2. The transfer factor (TF) of Na+ and Cl− in C. glauca under different treatments. (a) The TF of Na+ in C. glauca. (b) The TF of Cl− in C. glauca. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, inoculated with R. irregularis; 0, no NaCl stress; 600, 600 mM NaCl stress. The data are the means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different capital letters indicate significant differences between means at the p < 0.05 level by Tukey’s test.
Ijms 24 03680 g002
Ijms 24 03680 g003 550
Figure 3. The stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) in leaves of C. glauca in different treatments. (a) The Gs in leaves of C. glauca in different treatments. (b) The Tr in leaves of C. glauca in different treatments. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, inoculated with R. irregularis; 0, no NaCl stress; 600, 600 mM NaCl stress. The data are the means ± standard errors (n = 3). * indicates significant differences between means at the p < 0.05 level by one-way ANOVA, and ** indicates significant differences between means at the p < 0.01 level by one-way ANOVA.
Figure 3. The stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) in leaves of C. glauca in different treatments. (a) The Gs in leaves of C. glauca in different treatments. (b) The Tr in leaves of C. glauca in different treatments. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, inoculated with R. irregularis; 0, no NaCl stress; 600, 600 mM NaCl stress. The data are the means ± standard errors (n = 3). * indicates significant differences between means at the p < 0.05 level by one-way ANOVA, and ** indicates significant differences between means at the p < 0.01 level by one-way ANOVA.
Ijms 24 03680 g003
Ijms 24 03680 g004 550
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of NHX and CLC protein translated from cloned genes. (a) Phylogenetic tree of NHX protein. (b) Phylogenetic tree of CLC protein. The genes marked by black dots are the target genes of the study. The NCBI number of the cloned gene is as follows: ON246321 (CgNHX1), ON246322 (CgNHX2-1), ON246323 (CgNHX2-2), ON246324 (CgNHX6), ON246325 (CgNHX7), ON206670 (CgCLCB), ON246326 (CgCLCC), ON246328 (CgCLCD), ON246329 (CgCLCF), ON246330 (CgCLCG). The sequences of Actinidia rufa, Arabidopsis thaliana, Artemisia annua, Betula platyphylla, Carya illinoinensis, Citrus clementina, Cocos nucifera, Cucurbita argyrosperma, Juglans microcarpa × Juglans regia, Juglans regia, Morella rubra, Morus notabilis, Mucuna pruriens, Nicotiana attenuate, Oryza sativa, Populus euphratica, Prosopis alba, Quercus lobata, Quercus suber, Senna tora, Spatholobus suberectus, Trifolium pratense, Triticum aestivum, Triticum Urartu, Zea mays used for phylogenetic tree building were all from NCBI.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of NHX and CLC protein translated from cloned genes. (a) Phylogenetic tree of NHX protein. (b) Phylogenetic tree of CLC protein. The genes marked by black dots are the target genes of the study. The NCBI number of the cloned gene is as follows: ON246321 (CgNHX1), ON246322 (CgNHX2-1), ON246323 (CgNHX2-2), ON246324 (CgNHX6), ON246325 (CgNHX7), ON206670 (CgCLCB), ON246326 (CgCLCC), ON246328 (CgCLCD), ON246329 (CgCLCF), ON246330 (CgCLCG). The sequences of Actinidia rufa, Arabidopsis thaliana, Artemisia annua, Betula platyphylla, Carya illinoinensis, Citrus clementina, Cocos nucifera, Cucurbita argyrosperma, Juglans microcarpa × Juglans regia, Juglans regia, Morella rubra, Morus notabilis, Mucuna pruriens, Nicotiana attenuate, Oryza sativa, Populus euphratica, Prosopis alba, Quercus lobata, Quercus suber, Senna tora, Spatholobus suberectus, Trifolium pratense, Triticum aestivum, Triticum Urartu, Zea mays used for phylogenetic tree building were all from NCBI.
Ijms 24 03680 g004
Ijms 24 03680 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of NaCl stress and R. irregularis inoculation on the expression of CgNHXs and CgCLCs in shoots and roots. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, inoculated with R. irregularis; 0, no NaCl stress; 600, 600 mM NaCl stress. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between means at the p < 0.05 level by Tukey’s test.
Figure 5. Effects of NaCl stress and R. irregularis inoculation on the expression of CgNHXs and CgCLCs in shoots and roots. NM, nonmycorrhizal; AM, inoculated with R. irregularis; 0, no NaCl stress; 600, 600 mM NaCl stress. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between means at the p < 0.05 level by Tukey’s test.
Ijms 24 03680 g005
Ijms 24 03680 g006 550
Figure 6. Correlation coefficients of gene expression and physiological indices of C. glauca under NaCl stress. Each circle indicates Pearson’s correlation coefficient of a pair of parameters. * indicates a significant difference between the correlation coefficients at the p < 0.05 level, ** indicates a significant difference between the correlation coefficients at the p < 0.01 level.
Figure 6. Correlation coefficients of gene expression and physiological indices of C. glauca under NaCl stress. Each circle indicates Pearson’s correlation coefficient of a pair of parameters. * indicates a significant difference between the correlation coefficients at the p < 0.05 level, ** indicates a significant difference between the correlation coefficients at the p < 0.01 level.
Ijms 24 03680 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Dong, F.; Chen, H.; Xu, T.; Tang, M. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus on Sodium and Chloride Ion Channels of Casuarina glauca under Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043680

AMA Style

Wang Y, Dong F, Chen H, Xu T, Tang M. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus on Sodium and Chloride Ion Channels of Casuarina glauca under Salt Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(4):3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043680

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yihan, Fengxin Dong, Hui Chen, Tingying Xu, and Ming Tang. 2023. "Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus on Sodium and Chloride Ion Channels of Casuarina glauca under Salt Stress" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 4: 3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043680

APA Style

Wang, Y., Dong, F., Chen, H., Xu, T., & Tang, M. (2023). Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus on Sodium and Chloride Ion Channels of Casuarina glauca under Salt Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(4), 3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop