Next Article in Journal
Daily Brief Heat Therapy Reduces Seizures in A350V IQSEC2 Mice and Is Associated with Correction of AMPA Receptor-Mediated Synaptic Dysfunction
Previous Article in Journal
Improving the Management and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infection: Challenges and Research Opportunities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ca2+ Homeostasis by Plasma Membrane Ca2+ ATPase (PMCA) 1 Is Essential for the Development of DP Thymocytes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

New Insights into the Regulation of mTOR Signaling via Ca2+-Binding Proteins

Department of Applied Biosciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(4), 3923; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043923
Submission received: 28 December 2022 / Revised: 9 February 2023 / Accepted: 13 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Calcium-Binding Proteins and Cell Signaling 3.0)

Abstract

:
Environmental factors are important regulators of cell growth and proliferation. Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a central kinase that maintains cellular homeostasis in response to a variety of extracellular and intracellular inputs. Dysregulation of mTOR signaling is associated with many diseases, including diabetes and cancer. Calcium ion (Ca2+) is important as a second messenger in various biological processes, and its intracellular concentration is tightly regulated. Although the involvement of Ca2+ mobilization in mTOR signaling has been reported, the detailed molecular mechanisms by which mTOR signaling is regulated are not fully understood. The link between Ca2+ homeostasis and mTOR activation in pathological hypertrophy has heightened the importance in understanding Ca2+-regulated mTOR signaling as a key mechanism of mTOR regulation. In this review, we introduce recent findings on the molecular mechanisms of regulation of mTOR signaling by Ca2+-binding proteins, particularly calmodulin (CaM).

1. Introduction

It is essential for eukaryotes to sense environmental changes, such as changes in nutrients, growth factors, hormones, and stressors. This permits the organism to modulate the balance between anabolism and catabolism to regulate proper cell growth and proliferation. A key mediator in these roles is a large protein kinase called mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). mTOR is a mammalian ortholog of TOR that was first identified in yeast in 1991 [1]. As suggested by its name, mTOR is a functional cellular target of the immunosuppressant and anticancer drug rapamycin [1,2,3].
mTOR forms two complexes: mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2). These two complexes are functionally and structurally different and have important roles in distinct intracellular signaling pathways (Figure 1). mTORC1 contains three core components: mTOR, the regulatory-associated protein of mTOR (Raptor), and mammalian lethal with SEC13 protein 8 (mLST8). mTORC1 promotes protein synthesis and lipogenesis, while mTORC1 inhibits lysosome biogenesis and autophagy by phosphorylating its substrates [2,3,4,5,6,7]. In brief, mTORC1 regulates protein synthesis through directly phosphorylating Thr389 on p70 S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and several sites on eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E)-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) [3,8]. S6K1 regulates translation initiation and elongation by activating factors that control translation initiation, such as eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) and initiation factor 4B (eIF4B) [9,10], or by inhibiting eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase (eEF2K), which interferes with polypeptide chain elongation [11,12]. In addition, eIF4E promotes the translocation of ribosomal subunits to mRNA by recognizing and binding to the 5′ cap structure of mRNA, and 4E-BP1 binds to and inhibits eIF4E. The phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 by mTORC1 cancels its inhibitory activity toward eIF4E by preventing the binding between 4E-BP1 and eIF4E, thereby promoting translation initiation. In addition, mTORC1 enhances the activation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP1), a key transcriptional factor of lipogenic genes by phosphorylating Lipin1, and modulates its nuclear localization [5]. In addition to promoting such anabolic processes, mTORC1 also regulates cell growth by inhibiting catabolism. For example, mTORC1 phosphorylates transcription factor EB (TFEB) and prevents its nuclear translocation, thereby inhibiting lysosome biosynthesis [6,13]. mTORC1 also phosphorylates unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1 (ULK1) and autophagy-related protein 13 (Atg13), which are involved in the early stages of autophagy, thereby inhibiting autophagosome formation [7,14]. mTORC2 consists of four core subunits: mTOR, the rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR (Rictor), mLST8, and mammalian stress-activated protein kinase-interacting protein 1 (mSin1) [15,16]. Although a wide variety of mTORC1 substrates have been identified, information on mTORC2 substrates is still limited. mTORC2 is known to mainly phosphorylate cAMP-dependent, cGMP-dependent, and protein kinase C-type (AGC) kinases, including Akt (also known as protein kinase B, PKB), protein kinase C (PKC) family members, and serum- and glucocorticoid-induced kinases 1 (SGK1) [8]. mTORC2 activity regulates cell survival, metabolism, and cytoskeleton [3,17,18] (Figure 1).
mTORC1 activity is controlled by amino acids, growth factors, glucose, energy status, and stress [2,3,19]. The most characterized mechanism of mTORC1 activation by amino acids and growth factors involves two distinct small GTPases: Ras-related GTP-binding protein (Rag) GTPases and Ras homolog enriched in brain (Rheb) GTPase. Rag GTPases exist as heterodimers of RagA (or RagB) and RagC (or RagD) and localize to the lysosomal surface by interacting with a lysosome-anchored pentameric complex called Ragulator [20,21]. Amino acids promote the active forms of the Rag heterodimer, GTP-loaded RagA/B, and GDP-loaded RagC/D. The Rag heterodimer uses a unique intersubunit communication to rapidly respond to amino acid availability [22]. The binding of a first GTP molecule to one subunit of the dimer induces a conformational change that suppresses the association of a second GTP molecule to the other subunit. The active form of Rag GTPases can bind to Raptor, which promotes the lysosomal translocation of mTORC1 [2,3,19]. A recent study suggested different roles for Rag paralogues in the amino acid-mediated regulation of mTORC1 [23]. Luminal amino acids in lysosomes activate Rag GTPases via the association of vacuolar-type H+-ATPase (v-ATPase) and solute carrier family 38 member 9 (SLC38A9) with Ragulator [2,3,19,24,25]. The recruitment of mTORC1 at the lysosomal surface is believed to facilitate interaction with the mTORC1 activator Rheb GTPase [26,27] that is activated by growth factor signaling and amino acids. In addition to the well-characterized mechanism of mTORC1 activation, several reports have demonstrated that mTORC1 is activated in Golgi compartments, although the detailed mechanisms remain unclear [28,29,30]. Other detailed mechanisms of mTORC1 activation have been described in recent reviews [2,3,18,19]. Compared to mTORC1, the activators and mechanisms of mTORC2 are poorly understood, although it is thought that mTORC2 is mainly regulated by growth factors, including insulin (Figure 1).
Consistent with the diverse roles of mTOR signaling in controlling cellular metabolism and proliferation, novel regulatory mechanisms have recently emerged. Interestingly, mTOR signaling, especially mTORC1, is sensitive to changes in the intracellular concentration of calcium ions (Ca2+). It has been known for more than two decades that Ca2+ mobilization influences mTORC1 activity [31,32]. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms leading to mTORC1 have been unclear for a long time. Recently, many studies have suggested several molecular mechanisms of mTORC1 regulation by intracellular Ca2+ mobilization [19,33,34,35,36]. In addition, recent studies have suggested that Ca2+ signaling and subsequent regulation of mTORC1 signaling are the underlying basis for physiological and pathological cardiac hypertrophy [37,38].
In both cellular and physiological aspects as described above, understanding the molecular mechanism of Ca2+-mediated mTOR signaling is of great interest, because this signaling has fundamental roles in regulating cellular and physiological statuses. In this review, we summarize recent reports of Ca2+-mediated regulation of mTORC1 and mTORC2 signaling, with an emphasis on the Ca2+-binding protein calmodulin (CaM), the most-described Ca2+ sensor involved in mTOR signaling.

1.1. Ca2+ Signals and mTORC1 Signaling

Changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration have been suggested to affect mTORC1 signaling. Graves et al. reported that the phosphorylation of S6K1, a well-known substrate of mTORC1, was increased by treatment with the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 or the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) inhibitor thapsigargin [31]. Both treatments resulted in an increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels, while the increase in S6K1 phosphorylation was inhibited by the intracellular and extracellular Ca2+ chelators, 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid tetrakis(acetoxymethyl ester) (BAPTA-AM) and ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA), respectively [31]. Similarly, Conus et al. revealed that treatment with thapsigargin or another Ca2+ ionophore, ionomycin, induced the phosphorylation of S6K1. Pretreatment with EGTA completely abolished S6K1 activity under mitogenic stimuli [32]. These studies also showed that these treatments did not have a significant impact on the phosphorylation status of Akt. Similarly, Hannan et al. reported that Ca2+ is required for the priming step of S6K1 activation [39]. These initial findings suggest the involvement of Ca2+ mobilization in the mTORC1 signaling pathway.
Amino acids are fundamental activators of the mTORC1 pathway (Figure 1). Interestingly, several reports have described a relationship between amino acids and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization [19,33,40,41,42,43]. Mercan et al. have reported that leucine administration caused an intracellular Ca2+ rise by inducing a release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca2+ store in an inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptor (IP3R)-dependent manner in C2C12 cells [40]. The intracellular Ca2+ rise is likely mediated by the SH2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase (SHP-2)–phospholipase Cβ4 (PLCβ4) axis [40]. Although the detailed mechanism underlying the involvement of SHP-2 in leucine-induced Ca2+ mobilization is unclear, tyrosine phosphatase activity of SHP-2 is essential for mTORC1 activation [40]. In addition, Wauson et al. also reported that the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) umami taste receptor taste receptor type 1 member 1 (T1R1)/T1R3 is important in amino acid-induced mTORC1 activation via Ca2+ mobilization [41]. Amino acids sensed by T1R1/T1R3 activate mTORC1 through the PLCβ–Ca2+ extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 pathway, resulting in the promotion of protein synthesis and the suppression of autophagy [42]. Moreover, Ca2+ influx by activated T1R1/T1R3 is dependent on voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channels (VDCCs), because the blockade of VDCCs by nifedipine partially disturbs amino acid-induced mTORC1 activation [41].
Interestingly, independent of known mTORC1-activating conditions, such as amino acid availability, an intracellular Ca2+ rise can activate mTORC1 [35,44,45]. Receptors for neuropeptides orexin-A and orexin-B (ORX1 and ORX2) appear to mediate the Ca2+ influx for mTORC1 activation [44]. The orexin-A and orexin-B neuropeptides are necessary for maintaining arousal. Depletion of these peptides causes the chronic sleep disorder of narcolepsy [46,47]. Wang et al. revealed that mTORC1 activation following orexin sensing by ORX1 and ORX2 is independent of Akt or ERK, but depends on signal transduction through extracellular Ca2+ influx and the lysosomal pathway via v-ATPase and Rag GTPase [44]. Furthermore, orexin-dependent Ca2+ influx likely occurs through VDCCs, similar to the T1R1/T1R3-mediated influx. Thus, GPCRs for several signaling molecules participate in mTORC1 regulation via Ca2+ influx through VDCCs.
mTORC1 regulation by Ca2+ signaling has recently emerged from a physiological perspective. In an aging society, sarcopenia and muscle weakness with age are serious problems. In addition to cardiac hypertrophy associated with Ca2+-mediated mTORC1 regulation [37,38], Ito et al. revealed that the mechanical load can induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy via Ca2+-mediated mTORC1 activation [48]. The mechanical load can induce neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) activation in skeletal muscle. At the sarcolemma in skeletal muscle, nNOS is associated with the dystrophin complex that links the extracellular matrix to the intracellular cytoskeleton [49]. The mechanical load might activate stretch-activated ion channels, which in turn rapidly activate nNOS by binding with Ca2+ and calmodulin (CaM) [49]. Subsequently, nitric oxide (NO) is produced from L-arginine by activated nNOS and is then converted to peroxynitrite, which in turn can cause a rise in intracellular Ca2+ through transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 1 (TRPV1) located at the sarcoplasmic reticulum [48]. The TRPV1 agonist capsaicin alone can cause skeletal muscle hypertrophy via an increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels and mTORC1 activation, suggesting that the TRPV1-mediated intracellular Ca2+ rise is important for mTORC1 activation [48,50]. Interestingly, the entry of bacteria-derived Ca2+ into host macrophages also appears to upregulate mTORC1 signaling [51]. The P2A-type ATPase CtpF in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a plasma membrane Ca2+ transporter essential for survival of the bacteria in host macrophages. In M. tuberculosis-infected macrophages, Ca2+ efflux through CtpF of M. tuberculosis into host macrophages facilitates mTORC1 activation and impairs autophagy, which is thought to be a key mechanism for M. tuberculosis to escape elimination in infected cells during the early stages of infection, although the mechanism of how CtpF causes an intracellular Ca2+ rise in host macrophages remains unknown [51]. Thus, many reports have linked Ca2+ signaling to mTORC1 regulation.
It is also reported that mTOR affects Ca2+ signaling as well. For instance, mTOR signaling is involved in diverse biological pathways by regulating the activity and expression of various Ca2+ channels [52,53,54]. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) elevates mTOR signaling, which causes an upregulation of stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) and Orai1, an ER Ca2+ sensor and a Ca2+ channel at the plasma membrane, respectively [52]. These proteins contribute to the store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE), a Ca2+ entry from the extracellular space induced by the depletion of ER Ca2+ levels [55]. The subsequent intracellular Ca2+ increase through SOCE induces cell proliferation [52]. mTOR has also been reported to interact with lysosomal two-pore segment channel 2 (TPC2) [53,56], and inhibition of mTORC1 by the mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin induces mobilization of Ca2+ from lysosomes through TPC2 [57]. Hyperactivation of mTORC1 might be involved in epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) patients through the elevation of Ca2+ signaling [54]. TSC2 is a potent negative regulator of mTORC1, and depletion of TSC2 causes hyperactivation of mTORC1 (more detailed mechanisms are described in Section 1.2.3). Hisatsune et al. revealed that TSC2-deficient neurons show increased neural activity associated with highly synchronized Ca2+ spikes [54]. Interestingly, the expression of Cav1.3, a subtype of VDCCs, is upregulated in TSC2-deficient cells, which is inhibited by rapamycin treatment. The enhancement of the Ca2+ influx through Cav1.3 leads to abnormal neurite extension and sustained activation of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), which plays an important role in synaptic plasticity [54]. Thus, these studies suggest an important role for mTORC1 in Ca2+ signaling and a complicated and tightly intertwined relationship between mTOR signaling and Ca2+ signaling.
In the following sections, we will discuss the roles of Ca2+-binding proteins as key molecules linking intracellular Ca2+ mobilization with mTORC1 regulation.

1.2. Calmodulin (CaM) and mTORC1 Signaling

CaM is a ubiquitously expressed EF-hand Ca2+ sensor protein. An identical CaM protein is encoded by three genes (CALM1, CALM2, and CALM3) in mammals. The binding of Ca2+ to CaM induces a significant conformational change from a closed to an open state, exposing a hydrophobic surface that facilitates the binding with its target protein [58,59]. CaM plays vital roles in a wide range of biological processes, including cell growth [60], cell cycle progression, proliferation [61,62], and trafficking [63] by binding to hundreds of target proteins in a Ca2+-dependent manner. For example, CaM regulates smooth muscle contraction by binding and activating myosin light-chain kinase (MLCK) [64]. CaM has also been reported to mediate the activation of the mTOR pathway in response to intracellular Ca2+ increases induced by various stimuli. Interestingly, it has been reported that the addition of amino acids enhanced mTORC1 activity through an increase in intracellular Ca2+, which is sensed by CaM [19,33,34]. Gulati et al. reported that increased Ca2+ levels enhance the interaction between CaM and human vacuolar protein sorting 34 (hVps34), leading to mTORC1 activation [34]. Ca2+/CaM also binds to TSC2 and likely inhibits repression of TSC2 toward Rheb, leading to mTORC1 activation [33]. Irrespective of amino acid availability, Ca2+/CaM is also reported to directly bind to mTOR upon lysosomal Ca2+ release through the lysosome-resident Ca2+ channel, the transient receptor potential mucolipin 1 (TRPML1) [35]. In addition, cadmium is a toxic environmental contaminant that can promote Ca2+ entry and activation of the mTOR and MAPK pathways, leading to apoptosis [45]. Silencing CaM or pretreatment with BAPTA-AM, EGTA, or a CaM inhibitor, trifluoperazine, can prevent cadmium-induced activation of mTOR signaling, suggesting that Ca2+/CaM acts in cadmium-induced activation of mTOR signaling. Thus, it is plausible that Ca2+/CaM can modulate mTORC1 activity in concert with other pathways. mTORC1 might act as a coincidence detector, which ensures cell growth and proliferation only when both nutrient levels and cellular status (Ca2+ levels) are sufficient.
Some well-known downstream effectors of CaM, CaMKs, also appear to be involved in the regulation of mTORC1 signaling. In fetal mouse neurons, a short-term glutamatergic stimulation reportedly activated the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)–mTORC1 pathway. The activation requires increased intracellular Ca2+ via postsynaptic VDCCs, CaM, and Ca2+/CaM-dependent kinase (CaMK) II [65]. The CaM inhibitor calmidazolium and the CaMKII inhibitor KN-93 prevented the increase in S6K1 phosphorylation. In human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease cells, the knockdown of CaMK4 or the inhibition of CaMK4 by KN-93 reportedly decreased S6K1 phosphorylation and cell proliferation. Moreover, the inhibition of CaM and CaMK kinase (CaMKK)β, two key upstream regulators of CaMK4, also attenuates mTORC1 signaling [66]. In addition, Song et al. reported that CaMKII can phosphorylate and inactivate glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) in neuronal cells [67]. Because the inhibition of GSK3 leads to mTORC1 activation via the repression of TSC2 [68], it is possible that CaMKII might contribute mTORC1 activation through the phosphorylation of GSK3.
As described above, the binding of CaM to target proteins influences the regulation of the mTORC1 pathway in response to changes in Ca2+ levels. Because these factors are of interest as central mediators for regulating mTORC1 signaling in response to changes in intracellular Ca2+ levels, we discuss these factors in more detail below.

1.2.1. hVps34

Gulati et al. originally demonstrated that amino acids, especially leucine, induce a rise in intracellular Ca2+, which is required for mTORC1 activity [34]. Mechanistically, the increase in Ca2+ levels upon amino acid addition promotes binding between CaM and hVps34 [34], a class III PI3K that generates phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P), leading to the activation of mTORC1 [69,70] (Figure 2A). Several other studies demonstrated that hVps34 participates in the amino acid-induced activation of mTORC1 [71,72]. The addition of amino acids or glucose reportedly increased PI3P levels [70]. The increase in PI3P is suggested to promote the translocation of phospholipase D1 (PLD1) to the lysosome, where the production of phosphatidic acid (PA) facilitates mTORC1 activity [71,72] (Figure 2A). However, whether Ca2+/CaM binding to hVps34 is a key mechanism to activate mTORC1 remains controversial [35,73], because hVps15 was reported to be a more plausible candidate to activate hVps34 [73]. In particular, Yan et al. showed that hVps34 activity is regulated by its interaction with the Vps15 subunit of Vps34 kinase, but not by Ca2+/CaM, because BAPTA-AM or the CaM inhibitor W-7 did not affect hVps34 activity [73]. Therefore, it remains an open question whether Ca2+/CaM primarily contributes to the regulation of mTORC1 activity by directly altering hVps34 activity.

1.2.2. TRPML1 and mTOR

Lysosomes are organelles involved in intracellular Ca2+ storage [74]. Mutations in TRPML1 are known to cause a severe lysosomal storage disorder called mucolipidosis type IV [75]. TRPML1 activity is at least in part regulated by membrane lipids. Phosphatidylinositol (3,5)-bisphosphate [PI(3,5)P2], a low-abundance phosphoinositide present in late endosomes and lysosomes, can activate TRPML1 [76,77,78]. However, the detailed activation mechanism remains unclear, because PI(3,5)P2-bound TRPML1 appears to be in the closed conformation from the structural analysis [79]. TRPML1 modulates mTORC1 activity under nutrient-limited environments [35,36] (Figure 2B). The knockdown of TRPML1 results in the reduction of lysosomal Ca2+ efflux and reduced mTORC1 activity. In contrast, the overexpression of TRPML1 or stimulation with the TRPML1 agonist, ML-SA1, elevates mTORC1 activity and attenuates autophagy by inducing an interaction between CaM and mTORC1 in a Ca2+-dependent manner [35]. Interestingly, Ca2+/CaM binding to mTORC1, most likely to mTOR, was demonstrated to increase mTORC1 kinase activity in vitro [35], although the mTOR binding sites of Ca2+/CaM have not yet been identified. Conversely, mTORC1 phosphorylates TRPML1 at Ser572 and Ser576, thereby decreasing its Ca2+ efflux activity [80] (Figure 2B). Thus, it seems that mTORC1 and TRPML1 regulate each other’s activity, and this relationship would be helpful for regulating autophagy induction depending on the degree of nutrient starvation. Indeed, prolonged nutrient starvation leads to the reactivation of mTORC1 through CaM and TRPML1 [36]. This reactivation of mTORC1 by TRPML1 may provide minimal mTORC1 activity, even during starvation, to maintain cellular homeostasis [36]. It is also important to note that Ca2+ efflux through TRPML1 activity is also associated with the regulation of autophagy, independent of mTORC1 [81,82]. For instance, Ca2+/CaM-dependent phosphatase calcineurin is activated by Ca2+ released from lysosomes through TRPML1 during starvation, resulting in the dephosphorylation of its target, TFEB. Dephosphorylated TFEB is relieved from sequestration to the cytoplasm, translocates to the nucleus, and promotes the transcription of lysosomal protein genes, including autophagy-related genes [81]. In addition, Ca2+ release mediated by TRPML1 also induces autophagic vesicle biogenesis by activating ULK1 and hVps34 through CaMKKβ-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) during the acute phase of autophagy [82]. Therefore, TRPML1-mediated Ca2+ release from lysosomes appears to be important for autophagy generally, and the fluctuation of TRPML1 activity resulting from the duration and quality of nutrient starvation is a critical determinant for cells to induce autophagy [83], although it remains largely unclear how autophagy induction by TRPML1-mediated Ca2+ release is coordinately regulated. It is already reported that mTORC1 activity is decreased upon the acute phase of nutrient starvation, but its activity becomes reactivated during longer starvation due to a resupply of amino acids by autophagy [84]. Thus, it is possible that the changes of TRPML1 activity in the early phase of starvation might promote autophagy, independent of mTORC1 inactivation, and subsequent reactivation of mTORC1 in the later phase of starvation might then limit TRPML1 activity to readjust cellular status.

1.2.3. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex 2 (TSC2)

The TSC gene products TSC2 and TSC1 are tumor suppressors that form a complex with TBC1 domain family member 7 (TBC1D7) [85]. TSC2 possesses GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity toward Rheb, an activator (in its GTP-bound form) of mTORC1. Therefore, the TSC complex functions as a negative regulator of mTORC1 (Figure 1 and Figure 2C). The TSC–Rheb axis was originally thought to be regulated by growth factors, such as insulin. Insulin activates Akt via PI3K. Activated Akt phosphorylates and inactivates TSC2, leading to mTORC1 activation [86,87]. Several recent studies, including ours, have demonstrated that the TSC2–Rheb axis is also regulated by amino acid availability [27,33,88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. In TSC2 knockout cells, mTORC1 activity is less sensitive to amino acid starvation [33,90]. Moreover, changes in the GTP-loaded Rheb levels in response to amino acid availability have been reported [27,89,91]. Recently, we found that TSC2 regulation by amino acids is mediated by Ca2+/CaM [33]. We demonstrated that the intracellular Ca2+ rise induced by amino acid addition is sensed by CaM, and that Ca2+/CaM interacts with TSC2, leading to mTORC1 activation (Figure 2C). The CaM binding site of TSC2 [33,95] is located within the GAP domain and corresponds to one of the α-helices that supports the TSC2–Rheb interaction [96]. Therefore, Ca2+/CaM binding to TSC2 may cause a conformational change in the TSC2 GAP domain, thereby inhibiting the interaction between TSC2 and Rheb. In addition, several reports have suggested a role for Ca2+/CaM binding in controlling the cellular localization of TSC2. This region contributes to TSC2 translocation to the nucleus [95,97]. A recent study further suggested that Ca2+/CaM induces TSC2 translocation from the membrane to the nucleus, where TSC2 forms a complex with vitamin D receptor (VDR) that partly contributes to the transcription of the VDR target gene, CYP24A1 [98]. Thus, the change in TSC2 localization and/or binding ability to Rheb induced by Ca2+/CaM might be a potential mechanism regulating mTORC1 activity.
Regarding the connection between TSC2 and pathology, an autosomal dominant disorder of TSC affects multiple organs, including the brain, skin, kidneys, heart, and lungs, due to inactivating mutations in the TSC1 or TSC2 gene. Because TSC2 acts as a negative regulator of mTORC1, mTORC1 inhibitors can combat TSC pathologies, such as hamartomas, caused by mTORC1 hyperactivation [99,100,101]. Furthermore, hyperactivation of mTORC1 in TSC2 knockout mice induces cardiac hypertrophy [102]. Consistently, prolonged aberrant intracellular Ca2+ increases cause cardiac hypertrophy by evoking mTORC1 activation [37]. These findings implicate the control of binding between Ca2+/CaM and TSC2 as a potential therapeutic target for these diseases. Mutations in TSC genes also cause lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) and consequent lung disease, which often occur in women of childbearing age. Because estrogen and progesterone receptors are often expressed in LAM cells, these receptors are considered to be important mediators associated with the cause of LAM [103,104,105]. CaM binding to the estrogen receptor has been reported to enhance the stability of the estrogen receptor [106], although the detailed mechanism is unclear. Interestingly, the Ca2+/CaM-binding region of TSC2 overlaps with the estrogen receptor-binding region of TSC2 [107]. It is possible that Ca2+/CaM binding to TSC2 modulates the estrogen receptor stability, and deletion of TSC2 might trigger the onset of LAM by simultaneously affecting the estrogen receptor stability. Thus, the understanding of the mutual interactions of CaM, TSC2, and the estrogen receptor would provide important insight into the pathology of this disease.

2. Ca2+/CaM and mTORC2 Signaling

Compared with the regulation of the mTORC1 pathway by Ca2+/CaM, few studies have examined the regulation of the mTORC2 pathway by Ca2+/CaM. However, PI3K and Akt, the upstream and downstream factors of mTORC2, respectively, are reportedly regulated by Ca2+/CaM (Figure 3A,B). In 1997, Ca2+/CaM was shown to enhance PI3K activation through its interaction with the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain in the 85 kDa regulatory subunit of PI3K [108]. Subsequent analyses revealed the detailed mechanisms. CaM phosphorylated at Tyr99 first binds to the C-terminal domain of the p85 subunit (cSH2), and then to the N-terminal domain (nSH2) with a time lag [109,110] (Figure 3A). The insulin receptor tyrosine kinase phosphorylates CaM at Tyr99 in vitro. This phosphorylation generally increases the interaction between CaM and its target proteins [111]. Ca2+/CaM also directly contributes to Akt regulation (Figure 3B). Deb et al. revealed that Akt activation by the epidermal growth factor (EGF) was attenuated upon treatment with PLC inhibitor U-73122, BAPTA-AM, or CaM inhibitor W-7 in c-Myc-overexpressing mammary carcinoma cells [112]. Because treatment with W-7 did not decrease PI3K activation and treatment with CaMK, CaMKII, or CaMKIII inhibitors did not affect EGF-stimulated Akt activation, the involvement of Ca2+/CaM in Akt activation was thought to be a direct, rather than indirect, regulation via PI3K or CaMK. Indeed, Ca2+/CaM can bind to Akt at the first 42 amino acid residues within the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain [113]. Furthermore, the addition of EGF reportedly recruited both CaM and Akt to the plasma membrane, which was suppressed by W-7 treatment, in breast cancer cell lines [114]. It is proposed that the binding of CaM with the PH domain of Akt disrupts its interaction with the kinase domain, promoting the translocation of Akt to the plasma membrane [115]. At the plasma membrane, the PH domain of Akt binds to phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3), a product of PI3K activation from phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2]. The binding of Akt with PIP3 allows phosphorylation and activation by mTORC2 and 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1). Because CaM was also reported to compete with PIP3 for binding to the PH domain of Akt [113,116], the presence of PIP3 at the plasma membrane likely promotes dissociation of CaM from Akt [115] (Figure 3B). In addition to the direct effect of CaM on Akt, it remains unclear whether the Ca2+/CaM-dependent upregulation of Akt phosphorylation occurs through changes in mTORC2 activity.
Interestingly, recent reports have suggested that changes in Ca2+ levels affect mTORC2 activation. It has been suggested that mTORC2 is regulated by nutrients, such as amino acids, glucose, and stress, in addition to growth factors [117,118,119,120]. Ammonium ion is a metabolic waste product that may connect the change in Ca2+ levels to mTORC2 regulation. Glutaminolysis contributes to tumor growth, offering fuel for rapid cancer growth while emitting a large amount of ammonium ion. Merhi et al. discovered that ammonium ion could trigger rapid Rictor-dependent mTORC2 activation [121]. Consistent with the report that ammonium ion treatment increased intracellular Ca2+ levels transiently [122], BAPTA-AM treatment decreased ammonium ion-stimulated phosphorylation of Akt at Ser473 and phosphorylation of NDRG1 at Thr346, a downstream effector of SGK1, suggesting that ammonium ion-induced mTORC2 activation is dependent on the change of intracellular Ca2+ levels. In addition, a recent study provided direct evidence that mTORC2 assembly and activity are regulated by Ca2+ signaling [123]. Transmembrane B cell lymphoma 2-associated X protein (Bax) inhibitor motif-containing 6 (TMBIM6, also known as Bax inhibitor 1) contains six transmembrane regions and a Ca2+-channel pore domain in its C-terminal region and functions as a Ca2+ leak channel at the ER membrane [124] (Figure 3C). TMBIM6 deletion results in reduced mTORC2 activity and Akt-dependent metabolic processes. In particular, TMBIM6 binds directly to Rictor and ribosomes [123] that are required for mTORC2 activation [125]. Moreover, mTORC2 assembly and mTORC2 association with ribosomes can be disrupted in TMBIM6D213A mutant cells in which Ca2+ leakage from the ER does not occur [123]. Thus, Ca2+ leakage into the cytosol via TMBIM6 appears to be necessary for mTORC2 activity (Figure 3C). However, how exactly Ca2+ is sensed by mTORC2 remains unclear. We previously showed that CaM can bind to Rictor as well as TSC2 in a Ca2+-dependent manner [33] (Figure 3C). These findings suggest that CaM might bind to mTORC2 directly and mediate Ca2+ signals to mTORC2.

3. Involvement of Other Ca2+ Sensor Proteins in the mTOR Pathway

S100 proteins, named after the solubility of approximately 10,000 Da proteins in 100% saturated ammonium sulfate, are the Ca2+-binding protein superfamily that is involved in various biological processes by functioning in both intracellular and extracellular spaces, although most Ca2+ sensor proteins, such as CaM, act exclusively in the intracellular space [126,127]. S100 proteins have 25 known family members. The abnormal expression of some of them is frequently observed as a feature of various cancers [126,128]. Recent studies have demonstrated that the mTOR pathway participates in the progression of cancer and other diseases associated with S100 protein dysregulation [129,130,131,132]. For instance, S100A11 knockdown causes a decrease in phosphorylated PI3K, phosphorylated Akt, and phosphorylated mTOR and disturbs cell proliferation and migration in head and neck carcinoma cells, indicating that the upregulation of S100A11 activates the PI3K–Akt-mTOR pathway in these tumor cells [129]. S100A11 was also reported to be a positive regulator of mTOR signaling, contributing to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [130]. Similarly, S100B increases proliferation and invasion of human colon adenocarcinoma cells, and S100A8/9 activates proliferation and angiogenesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells through the mTOR pathway [131,132]. However, the detailed molecular mechanism and involvement of changes in Ca2+ levels remain largely unexplored.
Like CaM or S100 proteins, neuronal calcium sensor 1 (NCS1) belongs to the EF-hand superfamily of Ca2+-binding proteins. NCS1 was initially thought to be expressed only in neuronal cells. However, subsequent evidence revealed its expression in almost all tissues. Abnormally high NCS1 levels are observed in some tumor tissues, contributing to cancer cell survival and migration [133,134]. Recently, Grosshans et al. revealed that oxidative stress or tumor necrosis factor-α activates the transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), leading to the upregulation of the transcription level of NCS1 [135]. NCS1 maintains low intracellular Ca2+ levels under basal conditions. However, NCS1 increases Ca2+ release from the ER in an IP3-dependent manner in the presence of environmental stress stimuli, enhancing Akt activity to promote cell survival and motility [135].
Calpains are the family of neutral cysteine proteases that possess the Ca2+-binding domain and are directly activated by Ca2+. Fifteen isoforms of calpain have been identified in mammals [136]. Conventional calpains (calpain-1 and calpain-2) are ubiquitously expressed and function as heterodimers composed of a catalytic subunit (CAPN1 or CAPN2) and a regulatory subunit (CAPNS1, also known as CAPN4). Caplain-1 or calpain-2 is reported to affect mTOR signaling in physiological and pathological responses [137,138]. Asthma is a chronic airway disease, characterized by several features including airway remodeling. Rao et al. demonstrated that calpains mediate airway muscle cell remodeling through cytokine-induced collagen-I synthesis and proliferation through activation of Akt in mouse asthma models [137]. Indeed, the remodeling was diminished in capns1 knockout mice, or upon treatment with a selective calpain inhibitor MDL28170, or by the mTOR inhibitor Torin1. Calpain-2 also contributes to brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-induced dendritic protein synthesis, which is suggested to be an important role in memory formation [138]. Calpain-2 likely contributes to the activation of mTORC1 and mTORC2 by promoting TSC1, TSC2, and phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) degradation, although the detailed mechanism remains unclear.
These observations indicate that Ca2+-binding proteins other than CaM may also regulate cell proliferation and survival through the regulation of mTOR activity. Compared with the knowledge of the CaM-mediated regulation of mTOR signaling, the detailed molecular mechanisms of the non-CaM proteins remain to be clarified. Future studies on mTOR regulatory mechanisms, especially in which Ca2+-binding proteins are involved, will expand our understanding of the regulation of mTOR signaling.

4. Conclusions

Both mTOR signaling and Ca2+ signaling are fundamental pathways to regulate cellular adaptation to a wide array of environmental cues. As discussed above, novel regulatory modes of mTORC1 and mTORC2 in response to global or local changes of intracellular Ca2+ have emerged. In addition, several studies have further unveiled that Ca2+-mediated regulation of mTOR signaling is physiologically and pathologically relevant. Although our knowledge is still limited on how and when Ca2+-mediated mTOR regulation is coordinated to maintain cellular homeostasis, further molecular identification of new regulators in cooperation with Ca2+-binding proteins will greatly improve our understanding of the complex signaling network under various conditions. Although CaM antagonists are already available, it seems difficult to use those for pharmacological inhibitors of mTOR signaling due to the lack of specificity. Instead, it will be valuable to find a medicine to specifically inhibit CaM binding to target proteins, such as TSC2. In addition to drug screening, the development of a peptide with the binding motif sequence that selectively disrupts CaM–target interaction will be one of the potential clues to combat diseases associated with aberrant Ca2+ levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.A. and T.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.A. and T.T.; writing—review and editing, M.M., H.S. and T.T.; supervision, T.T.; funding acquisition, Y.A. and T.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (22K05440 to T.T.), and Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (22J20884 to A.Y.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank all members of the laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Regulation for their helpful discussion. A.Y. is a JSPS Research Fellow.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AGCcAMP-dependent, cGMP-dependent, and protein kinase C-type
AMPKAMP-activated protein kinase
Atg13autophagy-related protein 13
BAPTA-AM   1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N’,N’-tetraacetic acid tetrakis(acetoxymethyl ester)
BaxB cell lymphoma 2-associated X protein
BDNFbrain-derived neurotrophic factor
Ca2+calcium ion
CaMcalmodulin
CaMKCa2+/CaM-dependent protein kinase
CaMKKCaMK kinase
CREBcAMP response element-binding protein
ERendoplasmic reticulum
EGFepidermal growth factor
EGTAethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid
eEF2Keukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase
eIF4Aeukaryotic initiation factor 4A
eIF4Beukaryotic initiation factor 4B
eIF4Eeukaryotic initiation factor 4E
4E-BP1eIF4E-binding protein 1
ERKextracellular signal-regulated kinase
GAPGTPase-activating protein
GPCRG protein-coupled receptor
GSK3glycogen synthase kinase 3
hVps34human vacuolar protein sorting 34
IP3inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate
IP3Rinositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor
IP4inositol 1,3,4, 5-tetrakisphosphate
LAMlymphangioleiomyomatosis
mLST8mammalian lethal with SEC13 protein 8
mSin1mammalian stress-activated protein kinase-interacting protein 1
mTOR mechanistic target of rapamycin
mTORC1mTOR complex 1
mTORC2mTOR complex 2
MLCKmyosin light-chain kinase
NCS1neuronal calcium sensor 1
NF-κB nuclear factor-kappa B
nNOSneuronal nitric oxide synthase
PAphosphatidic acid
PDGFplatelet-derived growth factor
PDK13-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1
PIP2phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate
PI3Kphosphatidylinositol-3 kinase
PI3Pphosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate
PI(3,5)P2phosphatidylinositol (3,5)-bisphosphate
PI(4,5)P2phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate
PIP3phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate
PLCphospholipase C
PLD1phospholipase D1
PHpleckstrin homology
PKBprotein kinase B
PKCprotein kinase C
PTENphosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10
RagRas-related GTP-binding protein
Raptorthe regulatory associated protein of mTOR
RhebRas homolog enriched in brain
Rictorthe rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR
S6K1p70 S6 kinase 1
SERCAsarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase
SGK1serum- and glucocorticoid-induced kinases 1
SLC38A9solute carrier family 38 member 9
SH2Src homology 2
SHP-2SH2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase
SREBP1sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1
STIM1stromal interaction molecule 1
T1R1taste receptor type1 member1
TBC1D7TBC1 domain family member 7
TFEBtranscription factor EB
TRPV1transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 1
TRPML1transient receptor potential mucolipin 1
TMBIM6Transmembrane B cell lymphoma 2-associated X protein (Bax) inhibitor motif-containing 6
TPC2two-pore segment channel 2
TSC2tuberous sclerosis complex 2
ULK1unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1
v-ATPasevacuolar-type H+-ATPase
VDRvitamin D receptor
VDCCsvoltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channels

References

  1. Heitman, J.; Movva, N.R.; Hall, M.N. Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast. Science 1991, 253, 905–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, J.; Guan, K.-L. mTOR as a central hub of nutrient signalling and cell growth. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, G.Y.; Sabatini, D.M. mTOR at the nexus of nutrition, growth, ageing and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 183–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thoreen, C.C.; Chantranupong, L.; Keys, H.R.; Wang, T.; Gray, N.S.; Sabatini, D.M. A unifying model for mTORC1-mediated regulation of mRNA translation. Nature 2012, 485, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Peterson, T.R.; Sengupta, S.S.; Harris, T.E.; Carmack, A.E.; Kang, S.A.; Balderas, E.; Guertin, D.A.; Madden, K.L.; Carpenter, A.E.; Finck, B.N.; et al. mTOR complex 1 regulates Lipin 1 localization to control the SREBP pathway. Cell 2011, 146, 408–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Roczniak-Ferguson, A.; Petit, C.S.; Froehlich, F.; Qian, S.; Ky, J.; Angarola, B.; Walther, T.C.; Ferguson, S.M. The transcription factor TFEB links mTORC1 signaling to transcriptional control of lysosome homeostasis. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5, ra42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kim, J.; Kundu, M.; Viollet, B.; Guan, K.-L. AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Battaglioni, S.; Benjamin, D.; Wälchli, M.; Maier, T.; Hall, M.N. mTOR substrate phosphorylation in growth control. Cell 2022, 185, 1814–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Holz, M.K.; Ballif, B.A.; Gygi, S.P.; Blenis, J. mTOR and S6K1 mediate assembly of the translation preinitiation complex through dynamic protein interchange and ordered phosphorylation events. Cell 2021, 184, 2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dorrello, N.V.; Peschiaroli, A.; Guardavaccaro, D.; Colburn, N.H.; Sherman, N.E.; Pagano, M. S6K1- and ßTRCP-mediated degradation of PDCD4 promotes protein translation and cell growth. Science 2006, 314, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, X. Regulation of elongation factor 2 kinase by p90RSK1 and p70 S6 kinase. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 4370–4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kenney, J.W.; Moore, C.E.; Wang, X.; Proud, C.G. Eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase, an unusual enzyme with multiple roles. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2014, 55, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Martina, J.A.; Chen, Y.; Gucek, M.; Puertollano, R. mTORC1 functions as a transcriptional regulator of autophagy by preventing nuclear transport of TFEB. Autophagy 2012, 8, 903–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hosokawa, N.; Hara, T.; Kaizuka, T.; Kishi, C.; Takamura, A.; Miura, Y.; Iemura, S.; Natsume, T.; Takehana, K.; Yamada, N.; et al. Nutrient-dependent mTORC1 association with the ULK1–Atg13–FIP200 complex required for autophagy. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20, 1981–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Jacinto, E.; Facchinetti, V.; Liu, D.; Soto, N.; Wei, S.; Jung, S.Y.; Huang, Q.; Qin, J.; Su, B. SIN1/MIP1 maintains rictor-mTOR complex integrity and regulates Akt phosphorylation and substrate specificity. Cell 2006, 127, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Frias, M.A.; Thoreen, C.C.; Jaffe, J.D.; Schroder, W.; Sculley, T.; Carr, S.A.; Sabatini, D.M. mSin1 is necessary for Akt/PKB phosphorylation, and its isoforms define three distinct mTORC2s. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 1865–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Oh, W.J.; Jacinto, E. mTOR complex 2 signaling and functions. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 2305–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Szwed, A.; Kim, E.; Jacinto, E. Regulation and metabolic functions of mTORC1 and mTORC2. Physiol. Rev. 2021, 101, 1371–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Takahara, T.; Amemiya, Y.; Sugiyama, R.; Maki, M.; Shibata, H. Amino acid-dependent control of mTORC1 signaling: A variety of regulatory modes. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bar-Peled, L.; Schweitzer, L.D.; Zoncu, R.; Sabatini, D.M. Ragulator is a GEF for the Rag GTPases that signal amino acid levels to mTORC1. Cell 2012, 150, 1196–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sancak, Y.; Bar-Peled, L.; Zoncu, R.; Markhard, A.L.; Nada, S.; Sabatini, D.M. Ragulator-Rag complex targets mTORC1 to the lysosomal surface and is necessary for its activation by amino acids. Cell 2010, 141, 290–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Shen, K.; Choe, A.; Sabatini, D.M. Intersubunit crosstalk in the Rag GTPase heterodimer enables mTORC1 to respond rapidly to amino acid availability. Mol. Cell 2017, 68, 552–565.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gollwitzer, P.; Grützmacher, N.; Wilhelm, S.; Kümmel, D.; Demetriades, C. A Rag GTPase dimer code defines the regulation of mTORC1 by amino acids. Nat. Cell Biol. 2022, 24, 1394–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zoncu, R.; Bar-Peled, L.; Efeyan, A.; Wang, S.; Sancak, Y.; Sabatini, D.M. mTORC1 senses lysosomal amino acids through an inside-out mechanism that requires the vacuolar H+ -ATPase. Science 2011, 334, 678–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Shen, K.; Sabatini, D.M. Ragulator and SLC38A9 activate the Rag GTPases through noncanonical GEF mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 9545–9550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Long, X.; Lin, Y.; Ortiz-Vega, S.; Yonezawa, K.; Avruch, J. Rheb binds and regulates the mTOR kinase. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 702–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Long, X.; Ortiz-Vega, S.; Lin, Y.; Avruch, J. Rheb binding to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is regulated by amino acid sufficiency. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 23433–23436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Buerger, C.; DeVries, B.; Stambolic, V. Localization of Rheb to the endomembrane is critical for its signaling function. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 344, 869–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, X.; Zheng, X.F.S. Endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi localization sequences for mammalian target of rapamycin. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hao, F.; Kondo, K.; Itoh, T.; Ikari, S.; Nada, S.; Okada, M.; Noda, T. Rheb localized on the Golgi membrane activates lysosome-localized mTORC1 at the Golgi-lysosome contact site. J. Cell Sci. 2017, 131, jcs208017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Graves, L.M.; He, Y.; Lambert, J.; Hunter, D.; Li, X.; Earp, H.S. An intracellular calcium signal activates p70 but not p90 ribosomal S6 kinase in liver epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 1920–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Conus, N.M.; Hemmings, B.A.; Pearson, R.B. Differential regulation by calcium reveals distinct signaling requirements for the activation of Akt and p70(S6k). J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 4776–4782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Amemiya, Y.; Nakamura, N.; Ikeda, N.; Sugiyama, R.; Ishii, C.; Maki, M.; Shibata, H.; Takahara, T. Amino acid-mediated intracellular Ca2+ rise modulates mTORC1 by regulating the TSC2-Rheb axis through Ca2+/calmodulin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gulati, P.; Gaspers, L.D.; Dann, S.G.; Joaquin, M.; Nobukuni, T.; Natt, F.; Kozma, S.C.; Thomas, A.P.; Thomas, G. Amino acids activate mTOR complex 1 via Ca2+/CaM signaling to hVps34. Cell Metab. 2008, 7, 456–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Li, R.-J.; Xu, J.; Fu, C.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, Y.G.; Jia, H.; Liu, J.O. Regulation of mTORC1 by lysosomal calcium and calmodulin. Elife 2016, 5, e19360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sun, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhong, X.Z.; Cao, Q.; Zhu, X.-H.; Zhu, X.; Dong, X.-P. A negative feedback regulation of mTORC1 activity by the lysosomal Ca2+ channel MCOLN1 (mucolipin 1) using a CALM (calmodulin)-dependent mechanism. Autophagy 2018, 14, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Sanlialp, A.; Schumacher, D.; Kiper, L.; Varma, E.; Riechert, E.; Ho, T.C.; Hofmann, C.; Kmietczyk, V.; Zimmermann, F.; Dlugosz, S.; et al. Saraf-dependent activation of mTORC1 regulates cardiac growth. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2020, 141, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Altamirano, F.; Oyarce, C.; Silva, P.; Toyos, M.; Wilson, C.; Lavandero, S.; Uhlén, P.; Estrada, M. Testosterone induces cardiomyocyte hypertrophy through mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 pathway. J. Endocrinol. 2009, 202, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hannan, K.M.; Thomas, G.; Pearson, R.B. Activation of S6K1 (p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1) requires an initial calcium-dependent priming event involving formation of a high-molecular-mass signalling complex. Biochem. J. 2003, 370, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mercan, F.; Lee, H.; Kolli, S.; Bennett, A.M. Novel role for SHP-2 in nutrient-responsive control of S6 kinase 1 signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33, 293–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wauson, E.M.; Zaganjor, E.; Lee, A.-Y.; Guerra, M.L.; Ghosh, A.B.; Bookout, A.L.; Chambers, C.P.; Jivan, A.; McGlynn, K.; Hutchison, M.R.; et al. The G protein-coupled taste receptor T1R1/T1R3 regulates mTORC1 and autophagy. Mol. Cell 2012, 47, 851–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Zhou, Y.; Ren, J.; Song, T.; Peng, J.; Wei, H. Methionine regulates mTORC1 via the T1R1/T1R3-PLCβ-Ca2+-ERK1/2 signal transduction process in C2C12 cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Takahara, T.; Inoue, K.; Arai, Y.; Kuwata, K.; Shibata, H.; Maki, M. The calcium-binding protein ALG-2 regulates protein secretion and trafficking via interactions with MISSL and MAP1B proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 17057–17072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Wang, Z.; Liu, S.; Kakizaki, M.; Hirose, Y.; Ishikawa, Y.; Funato, H.; Yanagisawa, M.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Q. Orexin/hypocretin activates mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) via an Erk/Akt-independent and calcium-stimulated lysosome v-ATPase pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 31950–31959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Xu, B.; Chen, S.; Luo, Y.; Chen, Z.; Liu, L.; Zhou, H.; Chen, W.; Shen, T.; Han, X.; Chen, L.; et al. Calcium signaling is involved in cadmium-induced neuronal apoptosis via induction of reactive oxygen species and activation of MAPK/mTOR network. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Chemelli, R.M.; Willie, J.T.; Sinton, C.M.; Elmquist, J.K.; Scammell, T.; Lee, C.; Richardson, J.A.; Williams, S.C.; Xiong, Y.; Kisanuki, Y.; et al. Narcolepsy in orexin Knockout Mice. Cell 1999, 98, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lin, L.; Faraco, J.; Li, R.; Kadotani, H.; Rogers, W.; Lin, X.; Qiu, X.; de Jong, P.J.; Nishino, S.; Mignot, E. The sleep disorder canine narcolepsy is caused by a mutation in the hypocretin (orexin) receptor 2 gene. Cell 1999, 98, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ito, N.; Ruegg, U.T.; Kudo, A.; Miyagoe-Suzuki, Y.; Takeda, S. Activation of calcium signaling through Trpv1 by nNOS and peroxynitrite as a key trigger of skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Allen, D.G.; Whitehead, N.P.; Froehner, S.C. Absence of dystrophin disrupts skeletal muscle signaling: Roles of Ca2+, reactive oxygen species, and nitric oxide in the development of muscular dystrophy. Physiol. Rev. 2015, 96, 253–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ito, N.; Ruegg, U.T.; Kudo, A.; Miyagoe-Suzuki, Y.; Takeda, S. Capsaicin mimics mechanical load-induced intracellular signaling events. Channels 2013, 7, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Garg, R.; Borbora, S.M.; Bansia, H.; Rao, S.; Singh, P.; Verma, R.; Balaji, K.N.; Nagaraja, V. Mycobacterium tuberculosis calcium pump CtpF modulates the autophagosome in an mTOR-dependent manner. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ogawa, A.; Firth, A.L.; Smith, K.A.; Maliakal, M.V.; Yuan, J.X.-J. PDGF enhances store-operated Ca2+ entry by upregulating STIM1/Orai1 via activation of Akt/mTOR in human pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2012, 302, C405–C411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Cang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Navarro, B.; Seo, Y.; Aranda, K.; Shi, L.; Battaglia-Hsu, S.; Nissim, I.; Clapham, D.E.; Ren, D. mTOR regulates lysosomal ATP-sensitive two-pore Na+ channels to adapt to metabolic state. Cell 2013, 152, 778–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Hisatsune, C.; Shimada, T.; Miyamoto, A.; Lee, A.; Yamagata, K. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) inactivation increases neuronal network activity by enhancing Ca2+ influx via L-type Ca2+ channels. J. Neurosci. 2021, 41, 8134–8149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Soboloff, J.; Rothberg, B.S.; Madesh, M.; Gill, D.L. STIM proteins: Dynamic calcium signal transducers. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 549–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lin, P.H.; Duann, P.; Komazaki, S.; Park, K.H.; Li, H.; Sun, M.; Sermersheim, M.; Gumpper, K.; Parrington, J.; Galione, A.; et al. Lysosomal two-pore channel subtype 2 (TPC2) regulates skeletal muscle autophagic signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 3377–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ogunbayo, O.A.; Duan, J.; Xiong, J.; Wang, Q.; Feng, X.; Ma, J.; Zhu, M.X.; Evans, A.M. mTORC1 controls lysosomal Ca2+ release through the two-pore channel TPC2. Sci. Signal. 2018, 11, eaao5775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Zhang, M.; Tanaka, T.; Ikura, M. Calcium-induced conformational transition revealed by the solution structure of apo calmodulin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 1995, 2, 758–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Léger, C.; Pitard, I.; Sadi, M.; Carvalho, N.; Brier, S.; Mechaly, A.; Raoux-Barbot, D.; Davi, M.; Hoos, S.; Weber, P.; et al. Dynamics and structural changes of calmodulin upon interaction with the antagonist calmidazolium. BMC Biol. 2022, 20, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Klee, C.B.; Crouch, T.H.; Richman, P.G. Calmodulin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1980, 49, 489–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rasmussen, C.D.; Means, A.R. Calmodulin is required for cell-cycle progression during G1 and mitosis. EMBO J. 1989, 8, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Rasmussen, C.D.; Means, A.R. Calmodulin is involved in regulation of cell proliferation. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 3961–3968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tebar, F.; Villalonga, P.; Sorkina, T.; Agell, N.; Sorkin, A.; Enrich, C. Calmodulin regulates intracellular trafficking of epidermal growth factor receptor and the MAPK signaling pathway. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13, 2057–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Sparrow, M.P.; Mrwa, U.; Hofmann, F.; Rüegg, J.C. Calmodulin is essential for smooth muscle contraction. FEBS Lett. 1981, 125, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Lenz, G.; Avruch, J. Glutamatergic regulation of the p70S6 kinase in primary mouse neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 38121–38124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Zhang, Y.; Daniel, E.A.; Metcalf, J.; Dai, Y.; Reif, G.A.; Wallace, D.P. CaMK4 overexpression in polycystic kidney disease promotes mTOR-mediated cell proliferation. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 12, 4683–4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Clodfelder-Miller, B.; De Sarno, P.; Zmijewska, A.A.; Song, L.; Jope, R.S. Physiological and pathological changes in glucose regulate brain Akt and glycogen synthase kinase-3. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 39723–39731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Inoki, K.; Ouyang, H.; Zhu, T.; Lindvall, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Q.; Bennett, C.; Harada, Y.; Stankunas, K.; et al. TSC2 integrates Wnt and energy signals via a coordinated phosphorylation by AMPK and GSK3 to regulate cell growth. Cell 2006, 126, 955–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Nobukuni, T.; Joaquin, M.; Roccio, M.; Dann, S.G.; Kim, S.Y.; Gulati, P.; Byfield, M.P.; Backer, J.M.; Natt, F.; Bos, J.L.; et al. Amino acids mediate mTOR/raptor signaling through activation of class 3 phosphatidylinositol 3OH-kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 14238–14243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Byfield, M.P.; Murray, J.T.; Backer, J.M. hVps34 is a nutrient-regulated lipid kinase required for activation of p70 S6 kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 33076–33082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yoon, M.-S.; Du, G.; Backer, J.M.; Frohman, M.A.; Chen, J. Class III PI-3-kinase activates phospholipase D in an amino acid–sensing mTORC1 pathway. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 195, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Yoon, M.-S.; Son, K.; Arauz, E.; Han, J.M.; Kim, S.; Chen, J. Leucyl-tRNA synthetase activates Vps34 in amino acid-sensing mTORC1 signaling. Cell Rep. 2016, 16, 1510–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Yan, Y.; Flinn, R.J.; Wu, H.; Schnur, R.S.; Backer, J.M. hVps15, but not Ca2+/CaM, is required for the activity and regulation of hVps34 in mammalian cells. Biochem. J. 2009, 417, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Raffaello, A.; Mammucari, C.; Gherardi, G.; Rizzuto, R. Calcium at the center of cell signaling: Interplay between Endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and lysosomes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016, 41, 1035–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Sun, M.; Goldin, E.; Stahl, S.; Falardeau, J.L.; Kennedy, J.C.; Acierno, J.S.; Bove, C.; Kaneski, C.R.; Nagle, J.; Bromley, M.C.; et al. Mucolipidosis type IV is caused by mutations in a gene encoding a novel transient receptor potential channel. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000, 9, 2471–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Dong, X.P.; Shen, D.; Wang, X.; Dawson, T.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Weisman, L.S.; Delling, M.; et al. PI(3,5)P2 controls membrane trafficking by direct activation of mucolipin Ca2+ release channels in the endolysosome. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Xu, H. Phosphoinositide isoforms determine compartment-specific ion channel activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11384–11389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Gan, N.; Han, Y.; Zeng, W.; Wang, Y.; Xue, J.; Jiang, Y. Structural mechanism of allosteric activation of TRPML1 by PI(3,5)P 2 and rapamycin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2120404119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fine, M.; Schmiege, P.; Li, X. Structural basis for PtdInsP2-mediated human TRPML1 regulation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Onyenwoke, R.U.; Sexton, J.Z.; Yan, F.; Díaz, M.C.H.; Forsberg, L.J.; Major, M.B.; Brenman, J.E. The mucolipidosis IV Ca2+ channel TRPML1 (MCOLN1) is regulated by the TOR kinase. Biochem. J. 2015, 470, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Medina, D.L.; Di Paola, S.; Peluso, I.; Armani, A.; De Stefani, D.; Venditti, R.; Montefusco, S.; Scotto-Rosato, A.; Prezioso, C.; Forrester, A.; et al. Lysosomal calcium signalling regulates autophagy through calcineurin and TFEB. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Scotto Rosato, A.; Montefusco, S.; Soldati, C.; Di Paola, S.; Capuozzo, A.; Monfregola, J.; Polishchuk, E.; Amabile, A.; Grimm, C.; Lombardo, A.; et al. TRPML1 links lysosomal calcium to autophagosome biogenesis through the activation of the CaMKKβ/VPS34 pathway. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Abuammar, H.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Simon-Vecsei, Z.; Blastyák, A.; Csordás, G.; Páli, T.; Juhász, G. Ion channels and pumps in autophagy: A reciprocal relationship. Cells 2021, 10, 3537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yu, L.; McPhee, C.K.; Zheng, L.; Mardones, G.A.; Rong, Y.; Peng, J.; Mi, N.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wan, F.; et al. Termination of autophagy and reformation of lysosomes regulated by mTOR. Nature 2010, 465, 942–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Dibble, C.C.; Elis, W.; Menon, S.; Qin, W.; Klekota, J.; Asara, J.M.; Finan, P.M.; Kwiatkowski, D.J.; Murphy, L.O.; Manning, B.D. TBC1D7 is a third subunit of the TSC1-TSC2 complex upstream of mTORC1. Mol. Cell 2012, 47, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Potter, C.J.; Pedraza, L.G.; Xu, T. Akt regulates growth by directly phosphorylating TSC2. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, 658–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Inoki, K.; Li, Y.; Zhu, T.; Wu, J.; Guan, K.-L. TSC2 is phosphorylated and inhibited by Akt and suppresses mTOR signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, 648–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Carroll, B.; Maetzel, D.; Maddocks, O.D.K.; Otten, G.; Ratcliff, M.; Smith, G.R.; Dunlop, E.A.; Passos, J.F.; Davies, O.R.; Jaenisch, R.; et al. Control of TSC2-Rheb signaling axis by arginine regulates mTORC1 activity. Elife 2016, 5, e11058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Roccio, M.; Bos, J.L.; Zwartkruis, F.J.T. Regulation of the small GTPase Rheb by amino acids. Oncogene 2006, 25, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Gao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Arrazola, P.; Hino, O.; Kobayashi, T.; Yeung, R.S.; Ru, B.; Pan, D. Tsc tumour suppressor proteins antagonize amino-acid–TOR signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, 699–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fawal, M.-A.; Brandt, M.; Djouder, N. MCRS1 binds and couples Rheb to amino acid-dependent mTORC1 activation. Dev. Cell 2015, 33, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Yang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ting, C.-Y.; Bettedi, L.; Kim, K.; Ghaniam, E.; Lilly, M.A. The Rag GTPase regulates the dynamic behavior of TSC downstream of both amino acid and growth factor restriction. Dev. Cell 2020, 55, 272–288.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Demetriades, C.; Doumpas, N.; Teleman, A.A. Regulation of TORC1 in response to amino acid starvation via lysosomal recruitment of TSC2. Cell 2014, 156, 786–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Demetriades, C.; Plescher, M.; Teleman, A.A. Lysosomal recruitment of TSC2 is a universal response to cellular stress. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Noonan, D.J.; Lou, D.; Griffith, N.; Vanaman, T.C. A calmodulin binding site in the tuberous sclerosis 2 gene product is essential for regulation of transcription events and is altered by mutations linked to tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2002, 398, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yang, H.; Yu, Z.; Chen, X.; Li, J.; Li, N.; Cheng, J.; Gao, N.; Yuan, H.-X.; Ye, D.; Guan, K.-L.; et al. Structural insights into TSC complex assembly and GAP activity on Rheb. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. York, B.; Lou, D.; Noonan, D.J. Tuberin nuclear localization can be regulated by phosphorylation of its carboxyl terminus. Mol. Cancer Res. 2006, 4, 885–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Kazami, M.; Sakamoto, T.; Suzuki, T.; Inoue, H.; Kato, H.; Kobayashi, K.-I.; Tadokoro, T.; Yamamoto, Y. Ca2+/Calmodulin induces translocation of membrane-associated TSC2 to the nucleus where it suppresses CYP24A1 expression. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2022, 87, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Franz, D.N.; Capal, J.K. mTOR inhibitors in the pharmacologic management of tuberous sclerosis complex and their potential role in other rare neurodevelopmental disorders. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2017, 12, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Mizuguchi, M.; Ohsawa, M.; Kashii, H.; Sato, A. Brain symptoms of tuberous sclerosis complex: Pathogenesis and treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Palavra, F.; Robalo, C.; Reis, F. Recent advances and challenges of mTOR inhibitors use in the treatment of patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 9820181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Taneike, M.; Nishida, K.; Omiya, S.; Zarrinpashneh, E.; Misaka, T.; Kitazume-Taneike, R.; Austin, R.; Takaoka, M.; Yamaguchi, O.; Gambello, M.J.; et al. mTOR hyperactivation by ablation of tuberous sclerosis complex 2 in the mouse heart induces cardiac dysfunction with the increased number of small mitochondria mediated through the down-regulation of autophagy. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Glassberg, M.K.; Elliot, S.J.; Fritz, J.; Catanuto, P.; Potier, M.; Donahue, R.; Stetler-Stevenson, W.; Karl, M. Activation of the estrogen receptor contributes to the progression of pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis via matrix metalloproteinase-induced cell invasiveness. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 1625–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Sun, Y.; Zhang, E.; Lao, T.; Pereira, A.M.; Li, C.; Xiong, L.; Morrison, T.; Haley, K.J.; Zhou, X.; Yu, J.J. Progesterone and estradiol synergistically promote the lung metastasis of tuberin-deficient cells in a preclinical model of lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Horm. Cancer 2014, 5, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Prizant, H.; Hammes, S.R. Minireview: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM): The “other” steroid-sensitive cancer. Endocrinology 2016, 157, 3374–3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Li, Z.; Joyal, J.L.; Sacks, D.B. Calmodulin enhances the stability of the estrogen receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 17354–17360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. York, B.; Lou, D.; Panettieri, R.A.; Krymskaya, V.P.; Vanaman, T.C.; Noonan, D.J. Cross-talk between tuberin, calmodulin, and estrogen signaling pathways. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 1202–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Joyal, J.L.; Burks, D.J.; Pons, S.; Matter, W.F.; Vlahos, C.J.; White, M.F.; Sacks, D.B. Calmodulin activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 28183–28186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Zhang, M.; Li, Z.; Wang, G.; Jang, H.; Sacks, D.B.; Zhang, J.; Gaponenko, V.; Nussinov, R. Calmodulin (CaM) activates PI3Kα by targeting the “soft” CaM-binding motifs in both the nSH2 and cSH2 domains of p85α. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 11137–11146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, M.; Jang, H.; Gaponenko, V.; Nussinov, R. Phosphorylated calmodulin promotes PI3K activation by binding to the SH2 domains. Biophys. J. 2017, 113, 1956–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Corti, C.; LeClerc L’Hostis, E.; Quadroni, M.; Schmid, H.; Durussel, I.; Cox, J.; Dainese Hatt, P.; James, P.; Carafoli, E. Tyrosine phosphorylation modulates the interaction of calmodulin with its target proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 262, 790–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Deb, T.B.; Coticchia, C.M.; Dickson, R.B. Calmodulin-mediated activation of Akt regulates survival of c-Myc-overexpressing mouse mammary carcinoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 38903–38911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Dong, B.; Valencia, C.A.; Liu, R. Ca2+/calmodulin directly interacts with the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 25131–25140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Coticchia, C.M.; Revankar, C.M.; Deb, T.B.; Dickson, R.B.; Johnson, M.D. Calmodulin modulates Akt activity in human breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2009, 115, 545–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Agamasu, C.; Ghanam, R.H.; Xu, F.; Sun, Y.; Chen, Y.; Saad, J.S. The interplay between calmodulin and membrane interactions with the pleckstrin homology domain of Akt. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Agamasu, C.; Ghanam, R.H.; Saad, J.S. Structural and biophysical characterization of the interactions between calmodulin and the pleckstrin homology domain of Akt. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 27403–27413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Tato, I.; Bartrons, R.; Ventura, F.; Rosa, J.L. Amino acids activate mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2) via PI3K/Akt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 6128–6142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Masui, K.; Tanaka, K.; Ikegami, S.; Villa, G.R.; Yang, H.; Yong, W.H.; Cloughesy, T.F.; Yamagata, K.; Arai, N.; Cavenee, W.K.; et al. Glucose-dependent acetylation of Rictor promotes targeted cancer therapy resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 9406–9411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Masui, K.; Shibata, N.; Cavenee, W.K.; Mischel, P.S. mTORC2 activity in brain cancer: Extracellular nutrients are required to maintain oncogenic signaling. BioEssays 2016, 38, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Kazyken, D.; Magnuson, B.; Bodur, C.; Acosta-Jaquez, H.A.; Zhang, D.; Tong, X.; Barnes, T.M.; Steinl, G.K.; Patterson, N.E.; Altheim, C.H.; et al. AMPK directly activates mTORC2 to promote cell survival during acute energetic stress. Sci. Signal. 2019, 12, eaav3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Merhi, A.; Delrée, P.; Marini, A.M. The metabolic waste ammonium regulates mTORC2 and mTORC1 signaling. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Rose, C.; Kresse, W.; Kettenmann, H. Acute insult of ammonia leads to calcium-dependent glutamate release from cultured astrocytes, an effect of pH. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 20937–20944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Kim, H.-K.; Bhattarai, K.R.; Junjappa, R.P.; Ahn, J.H.; Pagire, S.H.; Yoo, H.J.; Han, J.; Lee, D.; Kim, K.-W.; Kim, H.-R.; et al. TMBIM6/BI-1 contributes to cancer progression through assembly with mTORC2 and AKT activation. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Bultynck, G.; Kiviluoto, S.; Henke, N.; Ivanova, H.; Schneider, L.; Rybalchenko, V.; Luyten, T.; Nuyts, K.; De Borggraeve, W.; Bezprozvanny, I.; et al. The C terminus of bax inhibitor-1 forms a Ca2+-permeable channel pore. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 2544–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Zinzalla, V.; Stracka, D.; Oppliger, W.; Hall, M.N. Activation of mTORC2 by association with the ribosome. Cell 2011, 144, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Gonzalez, L.L.; Garrie, K.; Turner, M.D. Role of S100 proteins in health and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 2020, 1867, 118677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Donato, R.; Cannon, B.R.; Sorci, G.; Riuzzi, F.; Hsu, K.; Weber, D.J.; Geczy, C.L. Functions of S100 proteins. Curr. Mol. Med. 2013, 13, 24–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Bresnick, A.R.; Weber, D.J.; Zimmer, D.B. S100 proteins in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Wang, C.; Lin, C.; Tao, Q.; Zhao, S.; Liu, H.; Li, L. Evaluation of calcium-binding protein A11 promotes the carcinogenesis of hypopharygeal squamous cell carcinoma via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019, 11, 3472–3480. [Google Scholar]
  130. Teng, F.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, Y.; Li, K.; Zhou, B.; Zhou, X.; Liu, W.; Zhang, P.; Liu, D.; et al. The S100 calcium-binding protein A11 promotes hepatic steatosis through RAGE-mediated AKT-mTOR signaling. Metabolism 2021, 117, 154725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Seguella, L.; Capuano, R.; Pesce, M.; Annunziata, G.; Pesce, M.; de Conno, B.; Sarnelli, G.; Aurino, L.; Esposito, G. S100B protein stimulates proliferation and angiogenic mediators release through RAGE/pAkt/mTOR pathway in human colon adenocarcinoma Caco-2 cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhong, X.; Xie, F.; Chen, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Q. S100A8 and S100A9 promote endothelial cell activation through the RAGE-mediated mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 22, 5293–5303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Apasu, J.E.; Schuette, D.; Laranger, R.; Steinle, J.A.; Nguyen, L.D.; Grosshans, H.K.; Zhang, M.; Cai, W.L.; Yan, Q.; Robert, M.E.; et al. Neuronal calcium sensor 1 (NCS1) promotes motility and metastatic spread of breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 4802–4813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Schuette, D.; Moore, L.M.; Robert, M.E.; Taddei, T.H.; Ehrlich, B.E. Hepatocellular carcinoma outcome is predicted by expression of Neuronal Calcium Sensor 1. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2018, 27, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Grosshans, H.K.; Fischer, T.T.; Steinle, J.A.; Brill, A.L.; Ehrlich, B.E. Neuronal Calcium Sensor 1 is up-regulated in response to stress to promote cell survival and motility in cancer cells. Mol. Oncol. 2020, 14, 1134–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ono, Y.; Saido, T.C.; Sorimachi, H. Calpain research for drug discovery: Challenges and potential. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016, 15, 854–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Rao, S.S.; Mu, Q.; Zeng, Y.; Cai, P.C.; Liu, F.; Yang, J.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Song, L.J.; Zhou, L.L.; et al. Calpain-activated mTORC2/Akt pathway mediates airway smooth muscle remodelling in asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2017, 47, 176–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Briz, V.; Hsu, Y.T.; Li, Y.; Lee, E.; Bi, X.; Baudry, M. Calpain-2-mediated PTEN degradation contributes to BDNF-induced stimulation of dendritic protein synthesis. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 4317–4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. General functions of mTOR signaling. mTORC1 is primarily composed of mTOR, Raptor, and mLST8. mTORC2 is composed of mTOR, Rictor, mSin1, and mLST8. Multiple stimuli, including amino acids, growth factors, and energy stress regulate mTORC1 activity via the GATOR2–GATOR1–Rag GTPases axis and the TSC2–Rheb GTPase axis. mTORC1 mainly functions to activate anabolism, protein synthesis, or lipid synthesis and to inhibit catabolism, lysosome biogenesis, or autophagy by directly phosphorylating various substrates (closed red curves in oval shapes). In contrast, mTORC2 is thought to respond to growth factors or insulin. Activated mTORC2 regulates cell survival, metabolism, and cytoskeleton dynamics by directly phosphorylating the AGC kinase protein family of Akt, PKC, and SGK1. Major direct substrates of mTORC2 are shown by closed orange curves in oval shapes.
Figure 1. General functions of mTOR signaling. mTORC1 is primarily composed of mTOR, Raptor, and mLST8. mTORC2 is composed of mTOR, Rictor, mSin1, and mLST8. Multiple stimuli, including amino acids, growth factors, and energy stress regulate mTORC1 activity via the GATOR2–GATOR1–Rag GTPases axis and the TSC2–Rheb GTPase axis. mTORC1 mainly functions to activate anabolism, protein synthesis, or lipid synthesis and to inhibit catabolism, lysosome biogenesis, or autophagy by directly phosphorylating various substrates (closed red curves in oval shapes). In contrast, mTORC2 is thought to respond to growth factors or insulin. Activated mTORC2 regulates cell survival, metabolism, and cytoskeleton dynamics by directly phosphorylating the AGC kinase protein family of Akt, PKC, and SGK1. Major direct substrates of mTORC2 are shown by closed orange curves in oval shapes.
Ijms 24 03923 g001
Figure 2. Ca2+/CaM-mediated regulation of mTORC1. (A) Amino acids have been reported to elevate intracellular Ca2+ concentration and enhance hVps34 kinase activity by promoting the binding between hVps34 and CaM in a Ca2+-dependent manner. hVps34 has also been suggested to be activated by amino acids by binding to hVps15. Activated hVps34 generates PI3P from PI in the lysosome, which can trigger PLD1 recruitment. PLD1 then produces PA, which leads to mTORC1 activation. (B) The lysosomal Ca2+ channel TRPML1 is negatively regulated by mTORC1. Prolonged nutrient starvation may decrease mTORC1 activity and relieve its inhibition. TRPML1-mediated Ca2+ release from the lysosome is sensed by CaM and might activate mTORC1 by the direct binding of Ca2+/CaM to mTOR. (C) Amino acids provoke extracellular Ca2+ influx. Ca2+/CaM activates mTORC1 through the TSC2–Rheb axis by binding to and inhibiting TSC2. Binding of Ca2+/CaM to TSC2 might affect TSC2 actions by affecting TSC2 binding to Rheb and/or TSC2 localization, although the detailed mechanism of how Ca2+/CaM suppresses TSC2–Rheb remains unclear. Ca2+ is indicated by yellow circles.
Figure 2. Ca2+/CaM-mediated regulation of mTORC1. (A) Amino acids have been reported to elevate intracellular Ca2+ concentration and enhance hVps34 kinase activity by promoting the binding between hVps34 and CaM in a Ca2+-dependent manner. hVps34 has also been suggested to be activated by amino acids by binding to hVps15. Activated hVps34 generates PI3P from PI in the lysosome, which can trigger PLD1 recruitment. PLD1 then produces PA, which leads to mTORC1 activation. (B) The lysosomal Ca2+ channel TRPML1 is negatively regulated by mTORC1. Prolonged nutrient starvation may decrease mTORC1 activity and relieve its inhibition. TRPML1-mediated Ca2+ release from the lysosome is sensed by CaM and might activate mTORC1 by the direct binding of Ca2+/CaM to mTOR. (C) Amino acids provoke extracellular Ca2+ influx. Ca2+/CaM activates mTORC1 through the TSC2–Rheb axis by binding to and inhibiting TSC2. Binding of Ca2+/CaM to TSC2 might affect TSC2 actions by affecting TSC2 binding to Rheb and/or TSC2 localization, although the detailed mechanism of how Ca2+/CaM suppresses TSC2–Rheb remains unclear. Ca2+ is indicated by yellow circles.
Ijms 24 03923 g002
Figure 3. Potential mechanisms of Ca2+/CaM-mediated regulation of Akt and mTORC2. (A) Ca2+/CaM phosphorylated at Tyr99 interacts with the N-terminal domain (nSH2) and the C-terminal domain (cSH2) of the 85kDa regulatory subunits of PI3K (p85) and stimulates kinase activity of PI3K. The generated PIP3 recruits Akt and PDK1 to the plasma membrane. Akt is fully activated by two kinases, PDK1 and mTORC2. (B) EGF induces an intracellular Ca2+ rise and enhances Akt activity by promoting CaM–Akt binding as follows: (1) EGF binding to EGFR activates PI3K to generate PIP3 from PIP2. (2) EGFR also activates PLCγ and induces Ca2+ release from the ER via an IP3-dependent mechanism. (3) Binding of Ca2+/CaM to the PH domain of Akt is proposed to change the conformation of Akt and to facilitate its targeting to the plasma membrane. (4) Binding of Akt to PIP3 promotes the dissociation from CaM. (5) Akt is phosphorylated by PDK1 and mTORC2 and is fully activated. (C) TMBIM6 Ca2+ channel-like protein interacts with mTORC2. Ca2+ released from the ER through TMBIM6 is necessary for mTORC2 assembly and association with ribosomes. Because CaM binds to Rictor in a Ca2+-dependent manner [33], CaM may mediate Ca2+ signaling to mTORC2 activation. Ca2+ is indicated by yellow circles.
Figure 3. Potential mechanisms of Ca2+/CaM-mediated regulation of Akt and mTORC2. (A) Ca2+/CaM phosphorylated at Tyr99 interacts with the N-terminal domain (nSH2) and the C-terminal domain (cSH2) of the 85kDa regulatory subunits of PI3K (p85) and stimulates kinase activity of PI3K. The generated PIP3 recruits Akt and PDK1 to the plasma membrane. Akt is fully activated by two kinases, PDK1 and mTORC2. (B) EGF induces an intracellular Ca2+ rise and enhances Akt activity by promoting CaM–Akt binding as follows: (1) EGF binding to EGFR activates PI3K to generate PIP3 from PIP2. (2) EGFR also activates PLCγ and induces Ca2+ release from the ER via an IP3-dependent mechanism. (3) Binding of Ca2+/CaM to the PH domain of Akt is proposed to change the conformation of Akt and to facilitate its targeting to the plasma membrane. (4) Binding of Akt to PIP3 promotes the dissociation from CaM. (5) Akt is phosphorylated by PDK1 and mTORC2 and is fully activated. (C) TMBIM6 Ca2+ channel-like protein interacts with mTORC2. Ca2+ released from the ER through TMBIM6 is necessary for mTORC2 assembly and association with ribosomes. Because CaM binds to Rictor in a Ca2+-dependent manner [33], CaM may mediate Ca2+ signaling to mTORC2 activation. Ca2+ is indicated by yellow circles.
Ijms 24 03923 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amemiya, Y.; Maki, M.; Shibata, H.; Takahara, T. New Insights into the Regulation of mTOR Signaling via Ca2+-Binding Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043923

AMA Style

Amemiya Y, Maki M, Shibata H, Takahara T. New Insights into the Regulation of mTOR Signaling via Ca2+-Binding Proteins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(4):3923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043923

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amemiya, Yuna, Masatoshi Maki, Hideki Shibata, and Terunao Takahara. 2023. "New Insights into the Regulation of mTOR Signaling via Ca2+-Binding Proteins" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 4: 3923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043923

APA Style

Amemiya, Y., Maki, M., Shibata, H., & Takahara, T. (2023). New Insights into the Regulation of mTOR Signaling via Ca2+-Binding Proteins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(4), 3923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043923

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop