Next Article in Journal
Induction of Antimicrobial Protein S100A15 Expression by Oral Microbial Pathogens Is Toll-like Receptors-Dependent Activation of c-Jun-N-Terminal Kinase (JNK), p38, and NF-κB Pathways
Next Article in Special Issue
Glucagon-like Peptide-2 Depresses Ileal Contractility in Preparations from Mice through Opposite Modulatory Effects on Nitrergic and Cholinergic Neurotransmission
Previous Article in Journal
VPg Impact on Ryegrass Mottle Virus Serine-like 3C Protease Proteolysis and Structure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gut Molecules in Cardiometabolic Diseases: The Mechanisms behind the Story
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms24065333
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Activation of TLRs Triggers GLP-1 Secretion in Mice

by
Lorène J. Lebrun
1,2,3,
Alois Dusuel
1,2,
Marion Xolin
1,2,
Naig Le Guern
1,2 and
Jacques Grober
1,2,3,*
1
INSERM LNC UMR1231, Université de Bourgogne, 21000 Dijon, France
2
LipSTIC LabEx, 21000 Dijon, France
3
Institut Agro Dijon, 21000 Dijon, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(6), 5333; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065333
Submission received: 1 February 2023 / Revised: 3 March 2023 / Accepted: 5 March 2023 / Published: 10 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Hormone: Molecular Mechanism and Its Biological Functions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The gastrointestinal tract constitutes a large interface with the inner body and is a crucial barrier against gut microbiota and other pathogens. As soon as this barrier is damaged, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are recognized by immune system receptors, including toll-like receptors (TLRs). Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is an incretin that was originally involved in glucose metabolism and recently shown to be rapidly and strongly induced by luminal lipopolysaccharides (LPS) through TLR4 activation. In order to investigate whether the activation of TLRs other than TLR4 also increases GLP-1 secretion, we used a polymicrobial infection model through cecal ligation puncture (CLP) in wild-type and TLR4-deficient mice. TLR pathways were assessed by intraperitoneal injection of specific TLR agonists in mice. Our results show that CLP induces GLP-1 secretion both in wild-type and TLR4-deficient mice. CLP and TLR agonists increase gut and systemic inflammation. Thus, the activation of different TLRs increases GLP-1 secretion. This study highlights for the first time that, in addition to an increased inflammatory status, CLP and TLR agonists also strongly induce total GLP-1 secretion. Microbial-induced GLP-1 secretion is therefore not only a TLR4/LPS-cascade.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

There is an extensive interface between the gastrointestinal tract and its surrounding environment. Therefore, in addition to nutrient absorption, the gastrointestinal tract plays an important role as a barrier against the microbial components of the gut. Even if the gut microbiota is crucial for human physiology, with roles including non-digestible carbohydrate metabolism, antimicrobial protection and immunomodulation [1], it has to be kept separate from the rest of the inner body. Given these conditions, it is consistent that the gut hosts the most developed immune system in the organism: the gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALTs) [2]. Alterations in the gut barrier and subsequent pathogen invasion activate inflammatory processes and can have disastrous consequences. When the gut barrier is damaged, the host’s innate immune system rapidly recognizes and responds to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) from microbes via specific receptors, including toll-like receptors (TLRs) [3], which induce immune cell recruitment and cytokine secretion.
Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is an incretin produced by enteroendocrine cells (EECs). It was originally described for its ability to stimulate insulin secretion and for its implication in glucose metabolism [4], but in addition to these glucoregulatory functions, GLP-1 also exerts anti-inflammatory effects [5]. GLP-1 agonists have been shown to have protective effects on the cardiovascular system [6,7,8], and, in humans, GLP-1 plasma levels are increased in sepsis and critical illness [9]. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, a situation known to alter the gut barrier [10], we have shown that GLP-1 was associated with poor clinical outcomes [11].
In addition, it has been suggested that GLP-1 has a role in maintaining gut homeostasis [12], but the literature on this is scarce. Liraglutide, a GLP-1 agonist, has been shown to attenuate intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice [13]. Moreover, it was suggested to have a protective role in gut permeability [14]. GLP-1 secretion mechanisms have been extensively described [15], and gut microbiota is involved in these secretory pathways through different mechanisms. Short-chain fatty acids produced by gut bacteria increase GLP-1 secretion through G-protein-coupled receptors GPR41/GPR43 [16]. Microbe-metabolized secondary bile acids increase GLP-1 secretion [17]. Bacterial components such as peptides from Akkermansia muciniphila [18] and from Staphylococcus epidermidis [19] have also been associated with enhanced GLP-1 secretion. Moreover, we and others have previously shown that inflammatory bacterial-derived lipopolysaccharides (LPS) increase GLP-1 plasma levels [20,21]. LPS molecules are able to directly activate the TLR4 in enteroendocrine L cells, leading to a significant and rapid increase in GLP-1 secretion upon gut-barrier alterations [22]. This LPS/GLP-1 cascade underlines the critical role of EECs as the key mucosal sensor of gut injury [23].
In different studies aiming to mimic sepsis using the cecal ligation puncture (CLP), which is one of the most frequently used models, TLR expression was modulated in the lungs, liver, kidneys and intestines [24,25,26]. EECs express multiple TLRs [27] and are targets of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFA), which are known to stimulate GLP-1 secretion [15]. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate whether, besides TLR4, the only TLR involved to date in GLP-1 secretion, other TLRs could also be implicated in the control of GLP-1 secretion. For this purpose, the CLP model was performed in wild-type (WT) and TLR4-deficient (Tlr4-/-) mice. In addition, after mice were injected with TLR-specific agonists, we assessed cytokines, TLR expression and GLP-1 secretion. Our data suggest for the first time that the activation of TLRs other than TLR4 is involved in GLP-1 secretion.

2. Results

2.1. CLP Induces Systemic Inflammation and Modulates Inflammatory Gene Expression in the Gut

The quantification of plasma cytokines revealed a major rise in inflammatory markers after CLP (Figure 1A). Cytokine mRNA levels were significantly increased in the ileum of CLP-treated mice compared to sham mice (Figure 1B). An analysis of the cytokines in the ileum showed that IL6, interleukin-1 beta (IL1B) and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) were significantly increased after CLP (Figure 1C). The mRNA levels in TLRs (1 to 9) were then assessed in the gut after CLP treatment (Figure 1D), showing a significant induction of Tlr2 and Tlr7 mRNA levels.

2.2. TLR Agonists Increase Cytokines and Expression of TLRs

Intraperitoneal injections of different TLR agonists induced inflammatory status and increased TLR gene expression in the gut (Figure 2). Plasma levels of pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokines were assessed (Figure 2A–E). Most of the analyzed cytokines were increased upon stimulation with specific TLR agonists. One can note that only TLR4, through its activation by LPS, led to an increase in all the cytokines. The mRNA gene expression of these cytokines was then measured in the ileum (Figure 2F–J). Here again, the mRNA expression of many cytokines increased through activation by TLRs, with TLR4 being the receptor that induced increases in all mRNA levels. Lastly, mRNA gene expression of the different TLRs was quantified in the ileum (Figure 2K). Among the nine studied TLRs, four had either a reduced (Tlr5 and Tlr6) or an identical (Tlr1 and Tlr9) mRNA expression.

2.3. GLP-1 Secretion Is Mediated through Multiple TLRs

Total plasma GLP-1 concentrations were assessed in CLP-induced and sham control mice. As shown in Figure 3A, CLP significantly increased GLP-1 secretion 3 h after the onset of CLP. The increased secretion was maintained at 6 and 24 h (data not shown). In Tlr4-/- mice, meaning in the absence of a functional TLR4 receptor, CLP still induced a significant increase in GLP-1 secretion compared to sham control mice (Figure 3B), suggesting the involvement of TLRs other than TLR4 in CLP-induced GLP-1 secretion. The total GLP-1 plasma levels were also investigated after the injection of different TLRs agonists compared to sodium chloride (NaCl)-injected mice (Figure 3C). Most of the TLRs agonists tested were able to induce the secretion of GLP-1.

3. Discussion

Here, we show that a CLP model induces a rapid (3 h) and significant increase in GLP-1 plasma levels and that this effect is associated with changes in TLR gene expression in the ileum. Moreover, CLP-induced GLP-1 secretion also occurs in Tlr4-/- mice, suggesting that PAMPs other than LPS induce a significant increase in GLP-1 secretion through the activation of TLRs.
GLP-1 is a gut-derived hormone generally described in the literature as playing an important role in glucose homeostasis by increasing insulin secretion, suppressing glucagon expression and also inhibiting gastric emptying and reducing food intake. GLP-1 is produced by EECs, which represent only 1% of intestinal epithelial cells. Despite this small proportion, the hormonal secretion of EECs is essential for the coordination of food intake, digestion and absorption [28]. However, an intestinal immuno-endocrine axis has been described for EECs, which may play a key role in the gut immune response to both pathogens and commensal bacteria [23]. Moreover, inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are associated with an increase in the number of these cells in the ileum [29]. Cells from the gut’s immune system express a wide range of peptide receptors produced by EECs [30]: ghrelin increases the activation and proliferation of T lymphocytes [31], and cholecystokinin stimulates the production of acetylcholine by B cells and thus has an effect on neutrophil recruitment [32]. In addition, both in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that EECs also express certain TLRs [27,33], and the activation of these TLRs induce hormone secretions: GLP-1 after TLR4 activation [22]; and cholecystokinin after TLR4, TLR5 and TLR9 activation.
GLP-1 has also been described as an endogenous immune modulator with a wide range of physiological effects, such as stimulation of anti-inflammatory signaling [5]. In two previous studies, we showed that (i) pro-inflammatory molecules located on the surface of Gram-negative bacteria, LPS, are able to enhance GLP-1 plasma levels when injected into mice or humans; and (ii) when the gut barrier is damaged after a gut ischemia/reperfusion experiment, endogenous LPS naturally present in the gut are involved in this rapid GLP-1 secretion, at least partly through the activation of TLR4 receptors [20,22]. Why GLP-1 is released upon gut-barrier dysfunction is currently unknown. Contrary to GLP-2, whose role in gut homeostasis and, in particular, gut permeability is well documented [34], the literature regarding GLP-1 in intestinal homeostasis and, in particular, in regulating the barrier function is scarce [35]. Different pathological situations known to cause a gut-barrier disturbance are associated with enhanced GLP-1 secretion. For instance, in IBDs such as Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, GLP-1 plasma levels are dysregulated [36]. In IBD patients, GLP-1 serum levels are increased [37]. Compared to healthy controls, Crohn’s disease patients have upregulated fasting GLP-1 levels, while stimulated GLP-1 secretion is reduced [38]. Sepsis is another situation in which GLP-1 secretion is enhanced. Previous studies have demonstrated that the endogenous GLP-1 system is activated during sepsis [9] and have associated GLP-1 levels with predicted mortality [39,40].
The CLP model used in this study is a widely used animal model for sepsis [41]. Gut-derived sepsis causes intestinal barrier dysfunction and induces bacterial translocation and the development of multiple-organ-dysfunction syndrome [42]. Whether in this study or in our previous one [22], the results obtained with Tlr4-/- mice suggest that other molecules derived from the gut, and certainly other TLRs, are involved in the GLP-1 secretion that occurs rapidly after gut-barrier alterations. Previous studies have suggested an important role for TLRs in the regulation of gut permeability during infection [43]. Nevertheless, not all TLRs have the same effect on gut permeability. Whereas TLR1 and TLR2 signaling sustain epithelial integrity [44,45], the activation of epithelial TLR4 increases barrier permeability and leaky gut in both human cell lines and mouse models [46,47,48]. However, the presence of functional TLR4 receptors has been shown to protect the intestinal mucosa from damage induced by ischemia/reperfusion treatment in mice [49,50]. Alterations in the intestinal epithelium of mice treated with dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) are associated with a strong increase in intestinal permeability [51], and the subsequent repair capacities of the intestinal mucosa are reduced by the antagonization of the TLR4 receptor. Tlr4-/- mice are also more sensitive to DSS and show greater bacterial translocation than WT mice [52]. Overall, these studies suggest that LPS/TLR4 engagement may provide beneficial effects in terms of gut-barrier integrity. Interestingly, in the experimental conditions described here, we observed the most robust GLP-1 secretion with LPS, the TLR4 agonist.
As discussed above, GLP-1 exerts anti-inflammatory properties and could contribute to gut-barrier regulation. Mice with a GLP-1 receptor deficiency are more sensitive to DSS-induced intestinal injuries [12]. One may assume that LPS-induced GLP-1 secretion could contribute to the beneficial effects of TLR4 and, more largely, PAMP-induced GLP-1 secretion. Moreover, TLR2-, TLR5- and TLR9-deficient mice are also more susceptible to chemically induced colitis [45,53,54]. Considering the anti-inflammatory properties of GLP-1, treatments for several disorders are based on the administration of GLP-1 agonists. For instance, in type 2 diabetes patients, semaglutide and liraglutide are associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events [6,55]. In preclinical studies of IBD, GLP-1 agonists have been shown to improve colitis by significantly improving the colon’s weight-to-length ratio, lowering the histopathological score and reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines levels [56,57]. A recent study has shown that chronic pretreatment with liraglutide in mice challenged with intestinal ischemia increased their overall survival [13]. In a human case report, the treatment of IBD (ulcerative colitis) patient with liraglutide led to a full remission of colitis symptoms [58]. In type 2 diabetes patients treated with GLP-1-based therapies, the disease course of IBD is improved compared with patients taking other antidiabetics [59]. Liraglutide treatment of mice undergoing sepsis induction improved the cardiovascular consequences of the dysregulated inflammation observed in sepsis [60]. Sepsis is associated with a hyperglycemic state that needs to be tightly controlled [61]. Indeed, hyperglycemia increases pathogen invasion [62] and, thus, nosocomial mortality [63]. GLP-1 agonists are currently under investigation as a means of controlling hyperglycemia and inflammation during sepsis [64]. Besides the exogenous administration of GLP-1 agonists, the increase of endogenous GLP-1 secretion can also be considered from a therapeutic point of view. For instance, probiotics are known to promote GLP-1 secretion and alleviate both type 2 [65,66] and type 1 [67] diabetes symptoms. Probiotic-related increases in GLP-1 secretion and the associated beneficial effects can be mediated through short-chain fatty acid production [68].
The present study has some limitations. It focuses mainly on TLR activation, and we cannot exclude that other pathways/receptors are involved. Indeed, muramyl dipeptide, a bacterial component, has been shown to improve insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in diet-induced obese mice via an increase in GLP-1 secretion by acting through the nucleotide oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) receptor [69]. Moreover, it is well established (and observed in the present study) that pro-inflammatory cytokines are secreted upon activation of TLRs. Since it has been demonstrated that IL6 and TNFA induce the secretion of GLP-1 [15], we can assume that the observed TLR-induced GLP-1 secretion could be indirectly mediated through cytokine expression. In this study, both the CLP model and the injection of TLR agonists induced cytokine release. Therefore, whether the above-described GLP-1 secretion is a direct result of TLR activation of EECs or an indirect pathway still needs to be determined. It is generally assumed in the literature that TLR ligands are able to induce GLP-1 secretion even though, to date, only the LPS/TLR4 pathway has been demonstrated to be involved in this secretion [20,22]. This study is the first to clearly highlight that the activation of other TLRs also leads to a GLP-1 secretion.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Animals and Samplings

Male wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J mice and male mice deficient in TLR4 (Tlr4-/-) on C57BL/6J background were used. Mice were 8-to-10 weeks of age and were housed in a controlled environment (light from 7 am to 7 pm, constant humidity and temperature) and were given a standard chow diet (A03 diet, Safe SAS, Augy, France). Every sampling procedure was performed under inhaled anesthesia (isoflurane) titrated to maintain spontaneous breathing. Blood was collected by intracardiac puncture in EDTA-coated tubes. Plasmas were separated by centrifugation at 8000× g for 10 min at 4 °C and were stored at −20 °C until use. Ileum tissues were immediately snap-frozen (immersion in liquid nitrogen) after harvest and stored at −80 °C until utilization.

4.2. Cecal Ligation Puncture (CLP) Treatment

CLP treatment was performed as previously described [70] on mice under inhaled anesthesia (isoflurane) titrated to maintain spontaneous breathing. Anesthetized mice were placed on a heating pad during the surgical procedure. Mice abdomens were shaved and cleaned with alcohol. A midline laparotomy was made, the cecum was isolated and ligated below the ileocecal valve with a 4–0 suture and without causing bowel obstruction. A perforation was made in the ligated cecum by a single puncture with a 21-gauge needle and gently squeezed to externalize a small amount of fecal matter. Cecum was then returned into the peritoneal cavity. The abdominal cavity of the mice was closed by suture and wound clips. Mice were then resuscitated with a subcutaneous injection of 0.4 mL of NaCl.

4.3. Drugs Administration in Mice

Mice were fasted for 4 h and intraperitoneally injected with different TLRs agonists (10µL/g): Pam3CysSerLys4 (Pam3CSK4; TLR1/2 agonist; 1 mg/kg; tlrl-pms, Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA), lipoteichoic acid (LTA; TLR2 agonist; 1 mg/kg; tlrl-pslta, Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA), Pam2CysSerLys4 (Pam2CSK4; TLR2/6 agonist; 1 mg/kg; tlrl-pm2s, Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA), polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (Poly (I:C); TLR3 agonist; 1 mg/kg, tlrl-picw, Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA), lipopolysaccharides (LPS; TLR4 agonist; 1 mg/kg; tlrl-pb5lps, Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA), flagellin (TLR5 agonist, 1 mg/kg; tlrl-bsfla, Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA), resiquimod (R848; TLR7/8 agonist; 1 mg/kg; tlrl-r848, Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA) and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN; TLR9 agonist; 0.6 mg/kg; tlrl-dls01, Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA).

4.4. Real-Time Quantitative PCR

Ileum was immediately snap-frozen (immersion in liquid nitrogen) after harvest and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction. Total RNA was isolated using an RNA extraction kit (RNeasy Mini Kit, 74106, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA extraction included a DNAse treatment step. RNA was quantified using the NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and 500 ng of RNA from each sample was reverse transcribed using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Multiscribe® reverse transcriptase, 4368813, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative PCRs were performed using StepOnePlus (Real-Time PCR System, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) and TaqMan® technology (4324018, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The mRNA level was normalized to levels of Rplp0 mRNA, and the results were expressed as relative expression levels, using the 2-ΔΔCt method.

4.5. Plasma and Tissues Biochemical Analyses

Cytokines and total GLP-1 concentrations were determined by commercially available ELISA Kits (M-CYTOMAG-70K, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA; EZGLP1T-36K, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Ileum segments were homogenized in RIPA buffer (89901, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing antiproteases and antiphosphatases (11873580001, Roche, Penzberg, Germany). Total protein concentration was measured with a commercial colorimetric assay kit (Thermo Scientific™ Pierce™ BCA assay kit, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.6. Statistics

Data were collected using Microsoft Excel for Office 365. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 6.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). To decide whether to use parametric or non-parametric statistics, the normality of distributions were assessed with the Shapiro–Wilk test (under n = 7, distributions were considered to be non-normal). The statistical significance of differences between two groups was evaluated with the Mann–Whitney U test or Student’s t-test (a statistical correction was applied when variances were different between groups). For more than two groups, a Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (NS, not significant; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001).

5. Conclusions

Overall, we report that activation of TLRs either through a polymicrobial infection model (CLP) or with specific agonists leads to increases in GLP-1 secretion. We confirm the secretory effects of LPS, and we extend this secretory capacity to others PAMPs through the activation of other TLRs than TLR4. The multiple-TLRs-induced GLP-1 secretion observed in this study supports a tiny link between GLP-1 and gut inflammatory processes. Even if the secretion of GLP-1 has increased the association to inflammatory processes such as IBD or sepsis, its actual systemic and gut functions in this context need more investigations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, L.J.L., A.D. and J.G.; formal analysis, L.J.L. and J.G.; investigation, L.J.L., A.D., M.X., N.L.G. and J.G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.J.L. and J.G.; writing—review and editing, L.J.L. and J.G.; supervision, J.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from the Université de Bourgogne, the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), by a French Government grant managed by the French National Research Agency under the program “Investissements d’Avenir” with reference ANR-11 LABX-0021 (Lipstic Labex).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines and approved by the University of Burgundy’s Ethics Committee on the Use of Laboratory Animals (protocol APAFIS#5459-20 1 6052514596672 v3, 30 December 2016).

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge V. Saint-Giorgio from the Centre de Zootechnie of the Université de Bourgogne for animal care and S. Rankin (Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital) and D. Masson for critical reading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jandhyala, S.M.; Talukdar, R.; Subramanyam, C.; Vuyyuru, H.; Sasikala, M.; Reddy, D.N. Role of the Normal Gut Microbiota. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 8787–8803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mörbe, U.M.; Jørgensen, P.B.; Fenton, T.M.; von Burg, N.; Riis, L.B.; Spencer, J.; Agace, W.W. Human Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissues (GALT); Diversity, Structure, and Function. Mucosal Immunol. 2021, 14, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Abreu, M.T.; Fukata, M.; Arditi, M. TLR Signaling in the Gut in Health and Disease. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 4453–4460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Drucker, D.J.; Habener, J.F.; Holst, J.J. Discovery, Characterization, and Clinical Development of the Glucagon-like Peptides. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 4217–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Rowlands, J.; Heng, J.; Newsholme, P.; Carlessi, R. Pleiotropic Effects of GLP-1 and Analogs on Cell Signaling, Metabolism, and Function. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2018, 9, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Iorga, R.A.; Bacalbasa, N.; Carsote, M.; Bratu, O.G.; Stanescu, A.M.A.; Bungau, S.; Pantis, C.; Diaconu, C.C. Metabolic and Cardiovascular Benefits of GLP-1 Agonists, besides the Hypoglycemic Effect (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 20, 2396–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vandemark, C.; Nguyen, J.; Zhao, Z.-Q. Cardiovascular Protection with a Long-Acting GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Liraglutide: An Experimental Update. Molecules 2023, 28, 1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Merza, N.; Akram, M.; Mengal, A.; Mustafa Rashid, A.; Mahboob, A.; Faryad, M.; Fatima, Z.; Ahmed, M.; Ansari, S.A. The Safety and Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2023, 48, 101602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Perl, S.H.; Bloch, O.; Zelnic-Yuval, D.; Love, I.; Mendel-Cohen, L.; Flor, H.; Rapoport, M.J. Sepsis-Induced Activation of Endogenous GLP-1 System Is Enhanced in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes/Metab. Res. Rev. 2018, 34, e2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Braun, J.-P.; Buhner, S.; Kastrup, M.; Dietz, E.; Langer, K.; Dohmen, P.; Lochs, H.; Spies, C. Barrier Function of the Gut and Multiple Organ Dysfunction after Cardiac Surgery. J. Int. Med. Res. 2007, 35, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nguyen, M.; Tavernier, A.; Gautier, T.; Aho, S.; Morgant, M.C.; Bouhemad, B.; Guinot, P.-G.; Grober, J. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Is Associated with Poor Clinical Outcome, Lipopolysaccharide Translocation and Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Cytokine 2020, 133, 155182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yusta, B.; Baggio, L.L.; Koehler, J.; Holland, D.; Cao, X.; Pinnell, L.J.; Johnson-Henry, K.C.; Yeung, W.; Surette, M.G.; Bang, K.W.A.; et al. GLP-1R Agonists Modulate Enteric Immune Responses Through the Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocyte GLP-1R. Diabetes 2015, 64, 2537–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zou, Z.; Wang, Z. Liraglutide Attenuates Intestinal Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury via NF-ΚB and PI3K/Akt Pathways in Mice. Life Sci. 2022, 309, 121045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nozu, T.; Miyagishi, S.; Kumei, S.; Nozu, R.; Takakusaki, K.; Okumura, T. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Analog, Liraglutide, Improves Visceral Sensation and Gut Permeability in Rats. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 33, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Brubaker, P.L. The Molecular Determinants of Glucagon-like Peptide Secretion by the Intestinal L Cell. Endocrinology 2022, 163, bqac159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tolhurst, G.; Heffron, H.; Lam, Y.S.; Parker, H.E.; Habib, A.M.; Diakogiannaki, E.; Cameron, J.; Grosse, J.; Reimann, F.; Gribble, F.M. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Stimulate Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Secretion via the G-Protein-Coupled Receptor FFAR2. Diabetes 2012, 61, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Parker, H.E.; Wallis, K.; le Roux, C.W.; Wong, K.Y.; Reimann, F.; Gribble, F.M. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Bile Acid-Stimulated Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Secretion. Br. J. Pharm. 2012, 165, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Cani, P.D.; Knauf, C. A Newly Identified Protein from Akkermansia Muciniphila Stimulates GLP-1 Secretion. Cell Metab. 2021, 33, 1073–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tomaro-Duchesneau, C.; LeValley, S.L.; Roeth, D.; Sun, L.; Horrigan, F.T.; Kalkum, M.; Hyser, J.M.; Britton, R.A. Discovery of a Bacterial Peptide as a Modulator of GLP-1 and Metabolic Disease. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nguyen, A.T.; Mandard, S.; Dray, C.; Deckert, V.; Valet, P.; Besnard, P.; Drucker, D.J.; Lagrost, L.; Grober, J. Lipopolysaccharides-Mediated Increase in Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion: Involvement of the Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP1) Pathway. Diabetes 2014, 63, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kahles, F.; Meyer, C.; Möllmann, J.; Diebold, S.; Findeisen, H.M.; Lebherz, C.; Trautwein, C.; Koch, A.; Tacke, F.; Marx, N.; et al. GLP-1 Secretion Is Increased by Inflammatory Stimuli in an IL-6–Dependent Manner, Leading to Hyperinsulinemia and Blood Glucose Lowering. Diabetes 2014, 63, 3221–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lebrun, L.J.; Lenaerts, K.; Kiers, D.; Pais de Barros, J.-P.; Le Guern, N.; Plesnik, J.; Thomas, C.; Bourgeois, T.; Dejong, C.H.C.; Kox, M.; et al. Enteroendocrine L Cells Sense LPS after Gut Barrier Injury to Enhance GLP-1 Secretion. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 1160–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Worthington, J.J.; Reimann, F.; Gribble, F.M. Enteroendocrine Cells-Sensory Sentinels of the Intestinal Environment and Orchestrators of Mucosal Immunity. Mucosal Immunol. 2018, 11, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Aravanis, C.V.; Kapelouzou, A.; Vagios, S.; Tsilimigras, D.I.; Katsimpoulas, M.; Moris, D.; Demesticha, T.D.; Schizas, D.; Kostakis, A.; Machairas, A.; et al. Toll-Like Receptors -2, -3, -4 and -7 Expression Patterns in the Liver of a CLP-Induced Sepsis Mouse Model. J. Investig. Surg 2020, 33, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Krivan, S.; Kapelouzou, A.; Vagios, S.; Tsilimigras, D.I.; Katsimpoulas, M.; Moris, D.; Aravanis, C.V.; Demesticha, T.D.; Schizas, D.; Mavroidis, M.; et al. Increased Expression of Toll-like Receptors 2, 3, 4 and 7 MRNA in the Kidney and Intestine of a Septic Mouse Model. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Bakopoulos, A.; Kapelouzou, A.; Tsilimigras, D.I.; Katsimpoulas, M.; Schizas, D.; Aravanis, C.; Balafas, E.; Mavroidis, M.; Pavlakis, K.; Machairas, A.; et al. Expression of Toll-like Receptors (TLRs) in the Lungs of an Experimental Sepsis Mouse Model. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0188050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bogunovic, M.; Davé, S.H.; Tilstra, J.S.; Chang, D.T.W.; Harpaz, N.; Xiong, H.; Mayer, L.F.; Plevy, S.E. Enteroendocrine Cells Express Functional Toll-like Receptors. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2007, 292, G1770–G1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gribble, F.M.; Reimann, F. Function and Mechanisms of Enteroendocrine Cells and Gut Hormones in Metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Harrison, E.; Lal, S.; McLaughlin, J.T. Enteroendocrine Cells in Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2013, 13, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Genton, L.; Kudsk, K.A. Interactions between the Enteric Nervous System and the Immune System: Role of Neuropeptides and Nutrition. Am. J. Surg. 2003, 186, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, J.H.; Patel, K.; Tae, H.J.; Lustig, A.; Kim, J.W.; Mattson, M.P.; Taub, D.D. Ghrelin Augments Murine T-Cell Proliferation by Activation of the Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase, Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase and Protein Kinase C Signaling Pathways. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 4708–4719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Reardon, C.; Duncan, G.S.; Brüstle, A.; Brenner, D.; Tusche, M.W.; Olofsson, P.S.; Rosas-Ballina, M.; Tracey, K.J.; Mak, T.W. Lymphocyte-Derived ACh Regulates Local Innate but Not Adaptive Immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 1410–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Palazzo, M.; Balsari, A.; Rossini, A.; Selleri, S.; Calcaterra, C.; Gariboldi, S.; Zanobbio, L.; Arnaboldi, F.; Shirai, Y.F.; Serrao, G.; et al. Activation of Enteroendocrine Cells via TLRs Induces Hormone, Chemokine, and Defensin Secretion. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 4296–4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Drucker, D.J.; Yusta, B. Physiology and Pharmacology of the Enteroendocrine Hormone Glucagon-like Peptide-2. Annu. Rev. Physiol 2014, 76, 561–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Drucker, D.J. Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Application of Glucagon-like Peptide-1. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 740–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hunt, J.E.; Holst, J.J.; Jeppesen, P.B.; Kissow, H. GLP-1 and Intestinal Diseases. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Keller, J.; Binnewies, U.; Rösch, M.; Juul Holst, J.; Beglinger, C.; Andresen, V.; Layer, P. Gastric Emptying and Disease Activity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 45, 1234–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lucotti, P.; Lovati, E.; Lenti, M.V.; Valvo, B.; Sprio, E.; Aronico, N.; Giuffrida, P.; Dell’Aera, D.; Pasini, A.; Ubezio, C.; et al. Abnormal Post-Prandial Glucagon-like Peptide Release in Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2021, 45, 101533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brakenridge, S.C.; Moore, F.A.; Mercier, N.R.; Cox, M.; Wu, Q.; Moldawer, L.L.; Mohr, A.M.; Efron, P.A.; Smith, R.S. Persistently Elevated Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Levels Among Critically-Ill Surgical Patients After Sepsis and Development of Chronic Critical Illness and Dismal Long-Term Outcomes. J. Am. Coll Surg. 2019, 229, 58–67.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lebherz, C.; Schlieper, G.; Möllmann, J.; Kahles, F.; Schwarz, M.; Brünsing, J.; Dimkovic, N.; Koch, A.; Trautwein, C.; Flöge, J.; et al. GLP-1 Levels Predict Mortality in Patients with Critical Illness as Well as End-Stage Renal Disease. Am. J. Med. 2017, 130, 833–841.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zanotti-Cavazzoni, S.L.; Guglielmi, M.; Parrillo, J.E.; Walker, T.; Dellinger, R.P.; Hollenberg, S.M. Fluid Resuscitation Influences Cardiovascular Performance and Mortality in a Murine Model of Sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2009, 35, 748–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Assimakopoulos, S.F.; Triantos, C.; Thomopoulos, K.; Fligou, F.; Maroulis, I.; Marangos, M.; Gogos, C.A. Gut-Origin Sepsis in the Critically Ill Patient: Pathophysiology and Treatment. Infection 2018, 46, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gibson, D.L.; Ma, C.; Rosenberger, C.M.; Bergstrom, K.S.B.; Valdez, Y.; Huang, J.T.; Khan, M.A.; Vallance, B.A. Toll-like Receptor 2 Plays a Critical Role in Maintaining Mucosal Integrity during Citrobacter Rodentium-Induced Colitis. Cell Microbiol. 2008, 10, 388–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kamdar, K.; Johnson, A.M.F.; Chac, D.; Myers, K.; Kulur, V.; Truevillian, K.; DePaolo, R.W. Innate Recognition of the Microbiota by Toll-like Receptor-1 Promotes Epithelial Homeostasis and Prevents Chronic Inflammation. J. Immunol. 2018, 201, 230–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Cario, E.; Gerken, G.; Podolsky, D.K. Toll-like Receptor 2 Controls Mucosal Inflammation by Regulating Epithelial Barrier Function. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 1359–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dheer, R.; Santaolalla, R.; Davies, J.M.; Lang, J.K.; Phillips, M.C.; Pastorini, C.; Vazquez-Pertejo, M.T.; Abreu, M.T. Intestinal Epithelial Toll-Like Receptor 4 Signaling Affects Epithelial Function and Colonic Microbiota and Promotes a Risk for Transmissible Colitis. Infect. Immun. 2016, 84, 798–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Guo, S.; Al-Sadi, R.; Said, H.M.; Ma, T.Y. Lipopolysaccharide Causes an Increase in Intestinal Tight Junction Permeability in Vitro and in Vivo by Inducing Enterocyte Membrane Expression and Localization of TLR-4 and CD14. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 182, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Nighot, M.; Al-Sadi, R.; Guo, S.; Rawat, M.; Nighot, P.; Watterson, M.D.; Ma, T.Y. Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Increase in Intestinal Epithelial Tight Permeability Is Mediated by Toll-Like Receptor 4/Myeloid Differentiation Primary Response 88 (MyD88) Activation of Myosin Light Chain Kinase Expression. Am. J. Pathol. 2017, 187, 2698–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tatum, P.M.; Harmon, C.M.; Lorenz, R.G.; Dimmitt, R.A. Toll-like Receptor 4 Is Protective against Neonatal Murine Ischemia-Reperfusion Intestinal Injury. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2010, 45, 1246–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Chen, L.-W.; Chang, W.-J.; Chen, P.-H.; Liu, W.-C.; Hsu, C.-M. TLR Ligand Decreases Mesenteric Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury-Induced Gut Damage through TNF-α Signaling. Shock 2008, 30, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kitajima, S.; Takuma, S.; Morimoto, M. Changes in Colonic Mucosal Permeability in Mouse Colitis Induced with Dextran Sulfate Sodium. Exp. Anim. 1999, 48, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Fukata, M.; Michelsen, K.S.; Eri, R.; Thomas, L.S.; Hu, B.; Lukasek, K.; Nast, C.C.; Lechago, J.; Xu, R.; Naiki, Y.; et al. Toll-like Receptor-4 Is Required for Intestinal Response to Epithelial Injury and Limiting Bacterial Translocation in a Murine Model of Acute Colitis. Am. J. Physiol.-Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2005, 288, G1055–G1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Rose, W.A.; Sakamoto, K.; Leifer, C.A. TLR9 Is Important for Protection against Intestinal Damage and for Intestinal Repair. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Chassaing, B.; Ley, R.E.; Gewirtz, A.T. Intestinal Epithelial Cell Toll-like Receptor 5 Regulates the Intestinal Microbiota to Prevent Low-Grade Inflammation and Metabolic Syndrome in Mice. Gastroenterology 2014, 147, 1363–1377.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Del Olmo-Garcia, M.I.; Merino-Torres, J.F. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. J. Diabetes Res. 2018, 2018, 4020492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Bang-Berthelsen, C.H.; Holm, T.L.; Pyke, C.; Simonsen, L.; Søkilde, R.; Pociot, F.; Heller, R.S.; Folkersen, L.; Kvist, P.H.; Jackerott, M.; et al. GLP-1 Induces Barrier Protective Expression in Brunner’s Glands and Regulates Colonic Inflammation. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 2078–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Zatorski, H.; Sałaga, M.; Fichna, J. Role of Glucagon-like Peptides in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases—Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharm. 2019, 392, 1321–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lourie, J. A Novel Use of Liraglutide: Induction of Partial Remission in Ulcerative Colitis and Ankylosing Spondylitis. Clin Med Rev Case Rep. 2019, 6, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Villumsen, M.; Schelde, A.B.; Jimenez-Solem, E.; Jess, T.; Allin, K.H. GLP-1 Based Therapies and Disease Course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. eClinicalMedicine 2021, 37, 100979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Helmstädter, J.; Keppeler, K.; Aust, F.; Küster, L.; Frenis, K.; Filippou, K.; Vujacic-Mirski, K.; Tsohataridis, S.; Kalinovic, S.; Kröller-Schön, S.; et al. GLP-1 Analog Liraglutide Improves Vascular Function in Polymicrobial Sepsis by Reduction of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hirasawa, H.; Oda, S.; Nakamura, M. Blood Glucose Control in Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. World J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 15, 4132–4136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Jafar, N.; Edriss, H.; Nugent, K. The Effect of Short-Term Hyperglycemia on the Innate Immune System. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2016, 351, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Leonidou, L.; Mouzaki, A.; Michalaki, M.; DeLastic, A.L.; Kyriazopoulou, V.; Bassaris, H.P.; Gogos, C.A. Cytokine Production and Hospital Mortality in Patients with Sepsis-Induced Stress Hyperglycemia. J. Infect. 2007, 55, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, F.; Zeng, F.; Luo, X.; Lei, Y.; Li, J.; Lu, S.; Huang, X.; Lan, Y.; Liu, R. GLP-1 Receptor: A New Target for Sepsis. Front. Pharm. 2021, 12, 706908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xiao, R.; Wang, R.; Li, S.; Kang, X.; Ren, Y.; Sun, E.; Wang, C.; He, J.; Zhan, J. Preliminary Evaluation of Potential Properties of Three Probiotics and Their Combination with Prebiotics on GLP-1 Secretion and Type 2 Diabetes Alleviation. J. Food Qual. 2022, 2022, e8586843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pegah, A.; Abbasi-Oshaghi, E.; Khodadadi, I.; Mirzaei, F.; Tayebinai, H. Probiotic and Resveratrol Normalize GLP-1 Levels and Oxidative Stress in the Intestine of Diabetic Rats. Metab. Open 2021, 10, 100093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wei, S.-H.; Chen, Y.-P.; Chen, M.-J. Selecting Probiotics with the Abilities of Enhancing GLP-1 to Mitigate the Progression of Type 1 Diabetes in Vitro and in Vivo. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 473–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yadav, H.; Lee, J.-H.; Lloyd, J.; Walter, P.; Rane, S.G. Beneficial Metabolic Effects of a Probiotic via Butyrate-Induced GLP-1 Hormone Secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 25088–25097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Williams, L.; Alshehri, A.; Robichaud, B.; Cudmore, A.; Gagnon, J. The Role of the Bacterial Muramyl Dipeptide in the Regulation of GLP-1 and Glycemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Klein, A.; Deckert, V.; Schneider, M.; Dutrillaux, F.; Hammann, A.; Athias, A.; Le Guern, N.; Pais de Barros, J.-P.; Desrumaux, C.; Masson, D.; et al. Alpha-Tocopherol Modulates Phosphatidylserine Externalization in Erythrocytes: Relevance in Phospholipid Transfer Protein-Deficient Mice. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2006, 26, 2160–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 24 05333 g001 550
Figure 1. Cecal ligation puncture (CLP) induces systemic inflammation and modulates inflammatory gene expression in the gut. Evaluation of the inflammatory status of mice 3 h after the onset of CLP or in sham control mice (n = 10). (A) Levels of plasma cytokines (pg/mL): interleukin-6 (IL6), interleukin-10 (IL10), interleukin-1 beta (IL1B), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFA) and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2). (B) Quantification of cytokine mRNA levels (compared to ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0 (Rplp0) mRNA) in the ileum. (C). Levels of ileum cytokines (pg/g of protein). (D). Quantification of toll-like receptor (TLR) mRNA levels (compare to Rplp0 mRNA) in the ileum. Statistical analyses were performed using the matched Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test. NS, not significant; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. All results are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 1. Cecal ligation puncture (CLP) induces systemic inflammation and modulates inflammatory gene expression in the gut. Evaluation of the inflammatory status of mice 3 h after the onset of CLP or in sham control mice (n = 10). (A) Levels of plasma cytokines (pg/mL): interleukin-6 (IL6), interleukin-10 (IL10), interleukin-1 beta (IL1B), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFA) and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2). (B) Quantification of cytokine mRNA levels (compared to ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0 (Rplp0) mRNA) in the ileum. (C). Levels of ileum cytokines (pg/g of protein). (D). Quantification of toll-like receptor (TLR) mRNA levels (compare to Rplp0 mRNA) in the ileum. Statistical analyses were performed using the matched Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test. NS, not significant; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. All results are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Ijms 24 05333 g001
Ijms 24 05333 g002 550
Figure 2. Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists increase cytokines and Tlr expressions. Evaluation of the inflammatory status in mice 3 h after intraperitoneal injection of sodium chloride (NaCl) (control group; n = 9) or TLR agonists: Pam3CysSerLys4 (Pam3CSK4; TLR1/2 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), lipoteichoic acid (LTA; TLR2 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), Pam2CysSerLys4 (Pam2CSK4; TLR2/6 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid (Poly(I:C); TLR3 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), lipopolysaccharides (LPS; TLR4 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 9), flagellin (TLR5 agonist, 1 mg/kg; n = 5), resiquimod (R848; TLR7/8 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5) and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN; TLR9 agonist; 0.6 mg/kg; n = 5). (A–E) Levels of plasma cytokines (pg/mL): interleukin-6 (IL6), interleukin-10 (IL10), interleukin-1 beta (IL1B), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFA) and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2). (F–J) Quantification of cytokines mRNA levels in the ileum (compared to ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0 (Rplp0) mRNA): Il6, Il10, Il1b, Tnfa and Ccl2. (K) Quantification of Tlr mRNA levels in the ileum (compared to Rplp0 mRNA); results are expressed as fold induction of the NaCl group. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. All results are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 2. Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists increase cytokines and Tlr expressions. Evaluation of the inflammatory status in mice 3 h after intraperitoneal injection of sodium chloride (NaCl) (control group; n = 9) or TLR agonists: Pam3CysSerLys4 (Pam3CSK4; TLR1/2 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), lipoteichoic acid (LTA; TLR2 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), Pam2CysSerLys4 (Pam2CSK4; TLR2/6 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid (Poly(I:C); TLR3 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), lipopolysaccharides (LPS; TLR4 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 9), flagellin (TLR5 agonist, 1 mg/kg; n = 5), resiquimod (R848; TLR7/8 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5) and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN; TLR9 agonist; 0.6 mg/kg; n = 5). (A–E) Levels of plasma cytokines (pg/mL): interleukin-6 (IL6), interleukin-10 (IL10), interleukin-1 beta (IL1B), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFA) and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2). (F–J) Quantification of cytokines mRNA levels in the ileum (compared to ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0 (Rplp0) mRNA): Il6, Il10, Il1b, Tnfa and Ccl2. (K) Quantification of Tlr mRNA levels in the ileum (compared to Rplp0 mRNA); results are expressed as fold induction of the NaCl group. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. All results are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Ijms 24 05333 g002
Ijms 24 05333 g003 550
Figure 3. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) secretion is mediated through multiple toll-like receptors (TLRs). (A) Total GLP-1 plasma levels (pM) 3 h after the onset of cecal ligation puncture (CLP; n = 10) or in sham control mice (n = 10) in wild-type (WT) mice. (B) Total GLP-1 plasma levels (pM) 3 h after the onset of CLP (n = 11) or in sham control mice (n = 10) in TLR4-deficient (Tlr4-/-) mice. (C) Total GLP-1 plasma levels in mice 3 h after an intraperitoneal injection of sodium chloride (NaCl; control group; n = 9) or different TLR agonists: Pam3CysSerLys4 (Pam3CSK4; TLR1/2 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), lipoteichoic acid (LTA; TLR2 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), Pam2CysSerLys4 (Pam2CSK4; TLR2/6 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (Poly(I:C); TLR3 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), lipopolysaccharides (LPS; TLR4 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 9), flagellin (TLR5 agonist, 1 mg/kg; n = 5), resiquimod (R848; TLR7/8 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5) and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN; TLR9 agonist; 0.6 mg/kg; n = 5). Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann–Whitney test (CLP experiment) or the Kruskal–Wallis test (agonists experiment); * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001. All results are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 3. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) secretion is mediated through multiple toll-like receptors (TLRs). (A) Total GLP-1 plasma levels (pM) 3 h after the onset of cecal ligation puncture (CLP; n = 10) or in sham control mice (n = 10) in wild-type (WT) mice. (B) Total GLP-1 plasma levels (pM) 3 h after the onset of CLP (n = 11) or in sham control mice (n = 10) in TLR4-deficient (Tlr4-/-) mice. (C) Total GLP-1 plasma levels in mice 3 h after an intraperitoneal injection of sodium chloride (NaCl; control group; n = 9) or different TLR agonists: Pam3CysSerLys4 (Pam3CSK4; TLR1/2 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), lipoteichoic acid (LTA; TLR2 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), Pam2CysSerLys4 (Pam2CSK4; TLR2/6 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (Poly(I:C); TLR3 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5), lipopolysaccharides (LPS; TLR4 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 9), flagellin (TLR5 agonist, 1 mg/kg; n = 5), resiquimod (R848; TLR7/8 agonist; 1 mg/kg; n = 5) and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN; TLR9 agonist; 0.6 mg/kg; n = 5). Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann–Whitney test (CLP experiment) or the Kruskal–Wallis test (agonists experiment); * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001. All results are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Ijms 24 05333 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lebrun, L.J.; Dusuel, A.; Xolin, M.; Le Guern, N.; Grober, J. Activation of TLRs Triggers GLP-1 Secretion in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5333. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065333

AMA Style

Lebrun LJ, Dusuel A, Xolin M, Le Guern N, Grober J. Activation of TLRs Triggers GLP-1 Secretion in Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(6):5333. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065333

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lebrun, Lorène J., Alois Dusuel, Marion Xolin, Naig Le Guern, and Jacques Grober. 2023. "Activation of TLRs Triggers GLP-1 Secretion in Mice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 6: 5333. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065333

APA Style

Lebrun, L. J., Dusuel, A., Xolin, M., Le Guern, N., & Grober, J. (2023). Activation of TLRs Triggers GLP-1 Secretion in Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(6), 5333. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065333

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop