Next Article in Journal
Selected Approaches to Disrupting Protein–Protein Interactions within the MAPK/RAS Pathway
Next Article in Special Issue
A Subpathway and Target Gene Cluster-Based Approach Uncovers lncRNAs Associated with Human Primordial Follicle Activation
Previous Article in Journal
Does Albumin Predict the Risk of Mortality in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Oogenesis in Women: From Molecular Regulatory Pathways and Maternal Age to Stem Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Single Copies of the 5S rRNA Inserted into 45S rDNA Intergenic Spacers in the Genomes of Nototheniidae (Perciformes, Actinopterygii)

Biological Faculty, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Emb. 7/9, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7376; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087376
Submission received: 29 March 2023 / Revised: 13 April 2023 / Accepted: 14 April 2023 / Published: 17 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transcriptional Regulation of Late Oogenesis and Early Embryogenesis)

Abstract

:
In the vast majority of Animalia genomes, the 5S rRNA gene repeats are located on chromosomes outside of the 45S rDNA arrays of the nucleolar organiser (NOR). We analysed the genomic databases available and found that a 5S rDNA sequence is inserted into the intergenic spacer (IGS) between the 45S rDNA repeats in ten species of the family Nototheniidae (Perciformes, Actinopterigii). We call this sequence the NOR-5S rRNA gene. Along with Testudines and Crocodilia, this is the second case of a close association between four rRNA genes within one repetitive unit in deuterostomes. In both cases, NOR-5S is oriented opposite the 45S rDNA. None of the three nucleotide substitutions compared to the canonical 5S rRNA gene influenced the 5S rRNA secondary structure. In transcriptomes of the Patagonian toothfish, we only found NOR-5S rRNA reads in ovaries and early embryos, but not in testis or somatic tissues of adults. Thus, we consider the NOR-5S gene to be a maternal-type 5S rRNA template. The colocalization of the 5S and 45S ribosomal genes appears to be essential for the equimolar production of all four rRNAs in the species that show rDNA amplification during oogenesis. Most likely, the integration of 5S and NOR rRNA genes occurred prior to Nototheniidae lineage diversification.

1. Introduction

The ribosomal genes (rDNA) encoding 18S, 5.8S, 28S, and 5S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) are key elements of eukaryotic genomes, since their products are directly involved in the biogenesis and functioning of the ribosomes providing for protein synthesis. Multiple 45S rDNA clusters of the 18S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNA genes separated by intergenic spacers (IGS) form the nucleolus organiser region (NOR) that can be situated in one chromosome pair or in a small number thereof. In the vast majority of Animalia genomes, copies of the 5S rRNA gene are not linked to NORs; they can be grouped at one or several chromosome sites outside the NOR as reviewed in [1,2,3,4]. The existence of this pattern correlates with different pathways of 45S and 5S rRNA biogenesis. The 18S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase (RNAP) I to a single precursor and then processed into three separate rRNA molecules in the nucleolus. The 5S rRNA molecules, synthesised by RNAP III, move into the cytoplasm through nuclear pores to complete processing. After that, they are imported back to the nucleus where they reach the nucleolus to be incorporated into the large ribosomal subunit [5]. In the genome of an organism, the 45S and 5S ribosomal genes are usually represented by different numbers of copies. For example, in humans, the diploid copy number varies from about 60 to more than 800 units for 45S rDNA [6,7,8,9,10], and from about 10 to more than 400 copies for 5S rDNA [9]. The existence of separate 45S and 5S rDNA arrays transcribed by specialised polymerases suggests their concerted transcription since all rRNA molecules are present in the ribosome in equimolar amounts (in a single copy). A certain balance of rRNA molecules in a cell can be maintained due to the fact that not all rDNA repeats in the NOR are active at the same time [11,12].
Impressive mechanisms that maintain the balance between the 45S pre-rRNA and 5S rRNA genes have been found in animals with 45S rDNA amplification in oocytes. In vertebrates, multiple NOR rDNA amplification accompanied by formation of numerous extrachromosomal nucleoli was described for oocytes of fish [13,14,15], amphibians [16,17,18,19,20], turtles [21,22,23], and crocodiles [24,25]. In these cases, the apparent imbalance between the doses of 18S, 5.8S, 28S, and 5S rRNA genes was counterbalanced by the presence of additional copies of 5S rRNA genes transcribed differentially in somatic cells and oocytes. In the genomes of some amphibians and fish, two types of slightly different 5S rRNA genes have been described [15,18,26,27,28]; their copies forming separate arrays outside the NOR. These two types of 5S rDNA, the oocytic (or maternal) and the somatic, show a differential pattern of gene expression in different tissues. In Xenopus species, the somatic 5S rDNA type is transcribed in the course of oogenesis, late embryogenesis, and in adult tissues [29]. It occupies a single locus on chromosome 9 in both X. laevis and X. borealis [30]. The other variant (the oocytic type), located at the distal end of the long arms of most Xenopus chromosomes [17,30], is transcribed in the growing oocytes and is inactive in early embryos and in the somatic cells of adults [30,31,32]. This genomic organisation is consistent with that shown in zebrafish [15]. In Danio rerio, the maternal type 5S rDNA contains several thousands of gene copies and is located on chromosome 4, whereas the somatic type set of only 12 gene copies is situated on chromosome 18. The oocytic and somatic 5S rRNA gene locations and expressions have only been thoroughly studied in the teleost species mentioned above; however, they were also found in Tinca tinca [33] and Misgurnus fossilis [34], and described in the genomes of other fish reviewed in [35], such as the representatives of the genus Leporinus [36] and Oreochromis niloticus [37]. This suggests a similar pattern of 5S rDNA organisation, with the oocytic and somatic 5S rDNA arrays occupying separate chromosome loci.
We have recently shown that in the genomes of turtles (Testudines) and crocodiles (Crocodilia), the oocytic/somatic 5S rDNA is organised differently. The oocyte 5S rRNA gene is inserted into the IGS of the NOR rDNA repeats [38]. This NOR-5S rRNA gene differs by 20% from the canonical 5S rRNA gene, referred to as the NTS-5S rRNA gene. The internal control regions for RNAP III are similar in the two gene types. During oogenesis, the NOR-5S rRNA genes are amplified together with other rRNA genes and specifically transcribed in growing oocytes but not in somatic cells. In vitellogenic oocytes, the NOR-5S rRNA prevails over the canonical 5S rRNA in polysomes. This may indicate that the non-canonical ribosomes are involved in oocyte-specific translation [38].
The studies clearly showing co-localization of 5S rDNA FISH probe signals with NOR on chromosomes in some fish, such as Characidae [39], Acipenseridae [40], and Nototheniidae reviewed in [41], have encouraged us to implement a new search for the NOR-5S rRNA genes in vertebrate genomic databases.
We now present the only taxon besides turtles and crocodiles that we found to contain a 5S rRNA gene insertion in the NOR-IGSs, namely the autochthonous Antarctic ray-finned fish (Nototheniidae, Notothenioidei, Perciformes, Actinopterygii). First, we annotated the 45S ribosomal repeats, including IGS, and characterised all the putative 5S rRNA gene sequences in WGS contigs of ten species from six Nototheniidae subfamilies. We also examined the presence of different types of 5S rRNAs in the transcriptome databases available for generative and somatic organs of Dissostichus eleginoides, and demonstrated for the first time the existence of oocytic (maternal) and somatic 5S rRNA variants in this species.

2. Results

2.1. 5S rDNA Distribution in the Genomes of Notothens

To construct a list of vertebrate genomes in which the 5S rRNA gene is incorporated in the NOR IGS sequence, we analysed all available NCBI WGS and RefSeq deuterostome databases, looking for cases where both 28S and 5S rDNA are present in the same contig. Besides turtles and crocodiles [38], the NOR associated the 5S rRNA gene was found in the IGSs of ten Nototheniidae species from six subfamilies, namely Artedidraconinae (Histiodraco velifer, NCBI WGS CALSCB010033685); Bathydraconinae (Gymnodraco acuticeps, NCBI WGS CADEHQ010011037); Channichthyinae (Chaenocephalus aceratus, NCBI WGS JAMFTG010002228, Chionodraco myersi, NCBI WGS RQJG01056976, Pseudochaenichthys georgianus, NCBI WGS CADEHP020001122); Harpagiferinae (Harpagifer antarcticus, NCBI WGS CADEHR010007419); Dissostichinae (Dissostichus mawsoni, NCBI WGS JAAKFY010000885, D. eleginoides, NCBI WGS JAOVFM010000209); and Trematominae (Trematomus loennbergii, NCBI WGS JAAOOA010003522, T. bernacchii, NCBI WGS CADEHO010005942). Complete rDNA clusters were found for C. aceratus, C. myersi, D. mawsoni, D. eleginoides, and T. loennbergii (Table S1). The species examined represent the main evolutionary branches of the Nototheniidae family (Figure 1) within its modern boundaries [42,43,44], which allows extrapolating the result obtained to all the representatives of the family. Thus, we can state that the 5S rRNA gene insert (NOR-5S rRNA gene) is present in the IGS in all the Nototheniidae species.
Similar to the turtle and crocodile genomes, the NOR-5S RNA gene in the IGS of Nototheniidae has an orientation opposite to the rDNA clusters and is noticeably shifted to the 28S rRNA gene (Figure 1). Nototheniidae IGSs contain tandem repeats of various types (which we called NR1-NR5, Figure S1), which is typical of other vertebrate IGS sequences. Between the 28S and NOR-5S genes, there are two family-specific tandem repeats: NR1 and NR2. At the 3′-end, the NOR-5S gene either borders on NR2 repeats (in G. acuticeps on genus specific GR2) or is separated from the gene itself by a short polyA sequence (Figure S2). At the 5′-end, the NOR-5S rRNA gene borders on a unique sequence, in which the first 24 nucleotides are highly conserved in all the species examined (Figure S2). This sequence differs from the spacer sequence of the canonical 5S rRNA gene cluster. Various tandem repeats (DR3, DR4, NR5 (Dissostichinae), TR3, NR5 (Trematominae), CR3, CR4, and NR5 (Channichthyinae)) are sequentially located downstream of the NOR-5S rRNA gene in the corresponding IGS sequences (Figure 1).
To compare the features of the discovered Nototheniidae NOR-5S rRNA gene with the canonical 5S rRNA genes, we searched the corresponding NCBI WGS databases for clustered 5S rRNA genes. Annotated sequences of the canonical 5S rRNA gene of the stickleback G. aculeatus were used as a reference. The 5S rRNA gene clusters were found in eight of the ten species examined: H. antarcticus (NCBI WGS CADEHR010007951), G. acuticeps (NCBI WGS CADEHQ010010126), P. georgianus (NCBI WGS CADEHK010005965), T. bernacchii (NCBI WGS CADEHO010006468), D. mawsoni (NCBI WGS JAAKFY010000822), T. loennbergii (NCBI WGS JAAOOA010000286), C. myersi (NCBI WGS RQJG01016824), and D. eleginoides (NCBI WGS JAOVFM010000358). In the genomic resources available for C. aceratus and H. velifer, no 5S rRNA gene clusters were found. Alignment of the clustered 5S rDNA sequences with each other shows their high degree of homology (Figure S3). The few sequence differences are probably a result of sequencing errors. We believe that the calculated consensus sequence of the 5S rRNA gene, which we will refer to as the NTS-5S rRNA gene, is the only form of the canonical 5S rRNA gene in Nototheniidae genomes.

2.2. 5S rRNA Types and Their Expression

A comparison of the NOR-5S and NTS-5S rRNA gene sequences in Nototheniidae revealed three nucleotide substitutions located at the 2nd, 23rd, and 112th positions (Figure 2A). The regulatory internal control region (ICR), known as the binding site for transcription factor TFIIIA [45], is exactly the same in the NOR-5S sequence as in the canonical 5S rRNA genes, suggesting the functionality of the former. An additional fact speaking in favour of NOR-5S functionality was obtained from the 5S rRNA secondary structure modelling. We showed that the consensus NOR-5S rRNA sequence forms a secondary structure typical of the canonical 5S rRNA molecule (Figure 2B).
This three nucleotide difference was used to discriminate between the closely related NTS-5S and NOR-5S rRNA variants in the nototheniids. We analysed the Patagonian toothfish transcriptome data of NCBI BioProjects PRJNA511578 (Figure 3) and PRJNA864592 (Figure S4) to identify the representation of NTS-5S and NOR-5S rRNAs in different tissues. It should be noted that rRNAs are removed in the course of routine transcriptomic analysis, so the expression of 5S rRNA variants may be underestimated. However, an abundance of NOR-5S transcripts was found only in the ovary and early embryo, being practically absent in the testis and adult somatic tissues (Figure 3 and Figure S4). These results are very similar to the findings obtained in turtles Mauremys reevesii and Trachemys scripta, where NOR-5S rRNAs were detected in ovary transcriptome and in oocytes by RT-PCR, respectively [38]. The predominant NOR-5S rRNA in toothfish ovaries and early embryos is considered to be maternal 5S rRNA involved in early development.

3. Discussion

In this work, we demonstrate the 5S rRNA gene inserted into NOR-IGS sequences in ten species of the Nototheniidae fish. Compared to the canonical NTS-5S rRNA gene, the NOR-5S rDNA insertion has three nucleotide substitutions that do not disrupt the secondary structure of the RNA transcript. Analysis of D. eleginoides transcriptome databases revealed NOR-5S rRNA in the ovaries and early embryos. The results indicate that the detected insertion is functional. It seems to be characteristic of the IGS of all the members of Nototheniidae, a family of a geographically limited habitat, mostly endemic to the Southern Ocean. Along with Testudines and Crocodilia in reptiles [38], this is a new reliable example of this situation in Deuterostoia.
The detection of a functional insertion of the 5S rRNA gene into the NOR-IGS sequence in Nototheniidae fish seems to be an important result. According to a few histological studies of ovaries in toothfish, the Nototheniidae family species are characterised by formation of multiple extrachromosomal nucleoli in oocyte nuclei caused by rRNA gene amplification during oogenesis [47,48,49]. In vertebrates, the NOR amplification phenomenon in oogenesis is typical of Chondrostei and Teleostei among fish, of all amphibians, and of Testudines and Crocodilia among reptiles. Nucleolar genes, thousand-fold amplified, are transcribed into a thousand-fold increased number of 45S pre-rRNA molecules. In late oocytes, rRNA is an essential part of maternal RNA, stockpiled for early embryonic development, for a review, see [50]. These rRNA molecules are components of the maternal ribosomes that provide protein synthesis in the early embryo before embryonic ribosomes are synthesised. A recent study by Leesch and co-authors convincingly demonstrated a mechanism of maternal ribosome suppression in late oocytes prior to fertilisation [51]. In amphibian embryos, the rRNA genes are switched on shortly after the midblastula stage [52]. In oocytes with amplified nucleoli, the quantitative rRNA balance between 45S and 5S rRNA should ensure formation of the required number of ribosomes to support early embryonic translation. At present, we see two strategies that are used to maintain the balance. (1) The extra NOR clusters of specific oocyte 5S genes were found on many chromosomes in the genomes of amphibians [53] and some fish [15]. They are activated in oocytes but not in somatic tissues. However, we do not know how their activity is regulated in balance with the activity of amplified 45S rDNA repeats. (2) In Testudines, Crocodilia, and Nototheniidae, the oocyte 5S rRNA gene is inserted within the NOR-IGS sequence [38], also shown in this research. This strategy provides for a quantitatively balanced amplification of all four ribosomal genes. However, again, we know nothing about the regulation of the transcription balance between the 45S pre-rRNA and 5S rRNA genes on amplified NOR repeats.
Similar to other eukaryotic groups (yeast [54], the Asteraceae family [55], and a few invertebrate species [56,57,58,59], as well as turtles and crocodiles among vertebrates [38]), the NOR-5S rRNA gene orientation is opposite to the cluster of ribosomal genes. It should be transcribed by RNAP III in the direction opposite to the 45S pre-rRNA synthesis by RNAP I. The anti-parallel orientation of the NOR-5S gene in the IGS sequence appears to prevent its transcription by RNAP I. A small amount of NOR-5S rRNA molecules in the testis and spleen transcriptomes (Figure 3 and Figure S4) may be due to either random reading during sequencing or appearance of unexpected transcripts as a result of RNAP errors.
As for the origin of the NOR-5S rDNA insert, one can make assumptions. We did not find any traces of mobile elements in the NOR-5S environment. However, we would not exclude the role of transposons in this insertion. In many animal taxa, rDNA loci were found to be the niche for mobile elements [60]. The strong intrafamily conservation and wide distribution of transposable elements across Nototheniidae species [61] supports this suggestion.
We found the NOR-5S rRNA genes in six nototheniid subfamilies for which WGS contigs with 5S rRNA genes were available. At present, only two phylogenetic branches among Vertebrata are known to have the NOR-5S rRNA genes in their genome. They are the Archelosauria clade of reptiles [38] and the Nototheniidae fish (this study). The difference between the NTS-5S and NOR-5SrRNA genes in turtles and crocodiles ranges from 23 (T. scrypta) to 26 (Alligator mississippiensis) nucleotide substitutions [38] compared the notothens (three nucleotide substitutions). Currently, the merged Nototheniidae family was thought to be formed about 42 million years ago (mya) in course of the Antarctic ice shield formation [42,44]. The evolutionary lineage of Archelosauria is much older, having evolved around 270 mya [62]. Thus, despite the similarities between Nototheniidae and Archelosauria, it is clear that the insertion of 5S rDNA into their IGS occurred independently.
Our findings in notothens can explain cytogenetic data obtained earlier. Two-colour hybridisation revealed colocalization of 5S and 45S rDNA on chromosomes of Nototheniidae fish (reviewed in [41], see also [63]). This chromosomal synteny of the two rRNA gene families is maintained in D. mawsoni, where the ribosomal genes locus is duplicated [64]. It is worth mentioning that in the sub-Antarctic clade, namely in chromosome sets of the Bovichtidae species, the 5S ribosomal genes are located far from the 45S genes on different pairs of chromosomes [65]. Together with our data, this proves that the integration of 5S and NOR rRNA genes occurred prior to Nototheniidae lineage diversification and confirms the validity of the last classifications proposed for the suborder Notothenioidei [42,43,44].

4. Materials and Methods

The search for nucleotide sequences containing fragments of the rRNA genes and IGS was performed using the BLAST algorithm applied to the NCBI WGS and RefSeq databases. To identify the 28S and 18S rRNA genes, we used the corresponding evolutionary conserved sequences from the chicken rRNA gene cluster [66] as a reference. To identify the 5S rRNA genes, we used annotated nucleotide sequences of Gasterosteous aculeatus (Gasterosteidae, Scorpaeniformes) (NCBI accession number: NC_053219.1:10986445-10986563) as a reference. We also used our data on both NOR-5S and NTS-5S rRNA genes of turtles and crocodiles [38]. Reference assembly, coverage assessment and sequence alignment and annotation, as well as 5S rRNA secondary structure modelling were performed using Geneious 9.1 (https://www.geneious.com/). NOR-5S and NTS-5S rRNA reference mapping was carried out using the Geneious mapper. The maximum number of allowable mismatches or gaps per read and per both read and reference sequence was 1%.
To identify and differentiate NOR-5S and NTS-5S rRNA transcripts in different tissues, we analysed raw transcriptome sequencing data of Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) available from NCBI BioProjects PRJNA511578 and PRJNA864592. D. eleginoides transcriptomes from the testis (NCBI SRA SRX5558183), ovary (NCBI SRA SRX5558184, SRX16793492), 2-day-old embryo (NCBI SRA SRX5558185), liver (NCBI SRA SRX5558187, SRX16793496), kidney (NCBI SRA SRX16793495), heart (NCBI SRA SRX16793493), and spleen (NCBI SRA SRX16793498) were analysed. Alignment of the transcripts to the NOR-5S rDNA sequences of D.eleginoides was performed using the Geneious algorithm. The 5S rRNA secondary structures were predicted according to Andronescu’s RNA energy model at +37 °C [46]. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using the Clustal W [67] and MAFFT [68] methods.

5. Conclusions

This study explores the colocalization of the 5S and 45S ribosomal genes, previously reported only for Testudines and Crocodilia species, in a wider number of vertebrate genomes. Most likely, the inclusion of the 5S rRNA gene in the NOR-IGS sequence contributed to the evolutionary success of the taxa, characterised by NOR amplification during oogenesis. The biological meaning of the colocalization of the 5S and 45S ribosomal genes seems to be the same in notothens, turtles, and crocodiles; it provides for a simultaneous and quantitatively coordinated amplification of all four rRNA genes. It is possible that 5S rRNA polymorphism leads to the formation of heterogeneous ribosomes and translation of different mRNAs. This would be important for the regulation of the expression at different stages of ontogenesis. Thus, there is a chance that further advances in deciphering difficult-to-assemble genomic regions, such as rDNA IGSs, will reveal more taxa with NOR-5S insertions in the genome.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24087376/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D. and E.G.; data curation, A.D. and S.G.; formal analysis, A.D.; funding acquisition, S.G.; methodology, A.D. and A.I.; project administration, S.G.; resources, A.D., S.G., A.I. and E.G.; supervision, E.G.; validation, A.D., S.G. and E.G.; visualization, A.I.; writing—original draft, A.D., S.G., A.I. and E.G.; writing—review and editing, S.G. and E.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 22-24-00538.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created in this study. The search results of publicly open data presented in this study are available in the text body or Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

We are sincerely grateful to Alexandra Gromova for her kind help with English. The analytical facilities were provided by “Chromas” Resource Centre of the Saint Petersburg State University Scientific Park.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Douet, J.; Tourmente, S. Transcription of the 5S rRNA heterochromatic genes is epigenetically controlled in Arabidopsis thaliana and Xenopus laevis. Heredity 2007, 99, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ciganda, M.; Williams, N. Eukaryotic 5S rRNA biogenesis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2011, 2, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vierna, J.; Wehner, S.; Hӧner, Z.; Siederdissen, C.; Martínez-Lage, A.; Marz, M. Systematic analysis and evolution of 5S ribsomal DNA in metazoans. Heredity 2013, 111, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Symonová, R. Integrative rDNAomics–importance of the oldest repetitive fraction of the eukaryote genome. Genes 2019, 10, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Smirnov, A.V.; Entelis, N.S.; Krasheninnikov, I.A.; Martin, R.; Tarassov, I.A. Specific features of 5S rRNA structure–Its interactions with macromolecules and possible functions. Biochemistry 2008, 73, 1418–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Caburet, S.; Conti, C.; Schurra, C.; Lebofsky, R.; Edelstein, S.J.; Bensimon, A. Human ribosomal RNA gene arrays display a broad range of palindromic structures. Genome Res. 2005, 15, 1079–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Stults, D.M.; Killen, M.V.; Pierce, H.H.; Pierce, A.J. Genomic architecture and inheritance of human ribosomal RNA gene clusters. Genome Res. 2008, 18, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gibbons, J.G.; Branco, A.T.; Yu, S.; Lemos, B. Ribosomal DNA copy number is coupled with gene expression variation and mitochondrial abundance in humans. Nat. Commun. 2014, 11, 4850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gibbons, J.G.; Branco, A.T.; Godinho, S.A.; Yu, S.; Lemos, B. Concerted copy number variation balances ribosomal DNA dosage in human and mouse genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 2485–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hori, Y.; Shimamoto, A.; Kobayashi, T. The human ribosomal DNA array is composed of highly homogenised tandem clusters. Genome Res. 2021, 31, 1971–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McStay, B.; Grummt, I. The epigenetics of rRNA genes: From molecular to chromosome biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008, 24, 131–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zillner, K.; Komatsu, J.; Kalepu, R.; Bensimon, A.; Németh, A. Active human nucleolar organizer regions are interspersed with inactive rDNA repeats in normal and tumor cells. Epigenomics 2015, 7, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vincent, W.S.; Halvorson, H.O.; Chen, H.-R.; Shin, D. A comparison of ribosomal gene amplification in uni- and multinucleolate oocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 1969, 57, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Raikova, E.V. Evolution of the nucleolar apparatus during oogenesis in Acipenseridae. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1976, 35, 667–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Locati, M.D.; Pagano, J.F.B.; Ensink, W.A.; van Olst, M.; van Leeuwen, S.; Nehrdich, U.; Zhu, K.; Spaink, H.P.; Girard, G.; Rauwerda, H.; et al. Linking maternal and somatic 5S rRNA types with different sequence-specific non-LTR retrotransposons. RNA 2017, 23, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gall, J.G. Differential synthesis of the genes for rRNA during amphibian oogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1968, 60, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Macgregor, H.C. Nucleolar DNA in oocytes of Xenopus laevis. J. Cell Sci. 1968, 3, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wegnez, M.; Monier, R.; Denis, H. Sequence heterogeneity of 5S RNA in Xenopus laevis. FEBS Lett. 1972, 25, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peterson, R.C.; Doering, J.L.; Brown, D.D. Characterization of two Xenopus somatic 5S DNAs and one minor oocyte-specific 5S DNA. Cell 1980, 20, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wormington, W.M.; Brown, D.D. Onset of 5S RNA gene regulation during Xenopus embryogenesis. Dev. Biol. 1983, 99, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Macgregor, H.C. Ways of amplifying ribosomal genes. In The Nucleolus; Jordan, E.G., Cullis, C.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1982; pp. 129–151. [Google Scholar]
  22. Callebaut, M.; van Nassauw, L.; Harrisson, F. Comparison between oogenesis and related ovarian structures in a reptile, Pseudemys scripta elegans (turtle) and in a bird Coturnix coturnix japonica (quail). Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1997, 37, 233–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Davidian, A.; Koshel, E.; Dyomin, A.; Galkina, S.; Saifitdinova, A.; Gaginskaya, E. On some structural and evolutionary aspects of rDNA amplification in oogenesis of Trachemys scripta turtles. Cell Tissue Res. 2021, 383, 853–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Uribe, M.C.A.; Guillette, L.J. Oogenesis and ovarian histology of the American alligator Alligator mississippiensis. J. Morphol. 2000, 245, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moore, B.C.; Uribe-Aranza, M.C.; Boggs, A.S.P.; Guillette, L.J., Jr. Developmental morphology of the neonatal alligator (Aligator mississippiensis) ovary. J. Morphol. 2008, 269, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ford, P.J.; Southern, E.M. Different sequences for 5S RNA in kidney cells and ovaries of Xenopus laevis. Nat. New Biol. 1973, 241, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Long, E.O.; Dawid, I.B. Repeated genes in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1980, 49, 727–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Korn, L.J. Transcription of Xenopus 5S ribosomal RNA genes. Nature 1982, 295, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dennis, H.; Wegnez, M. Biochemical research on oogenesis: Oocytes of Xenopus laevis synthesize but do not accumulate 5S RNA of somatic type. Dev. Biol. 1977, 58, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Harper, M.E.; Price, J.; Korn, L.J. Chromosomal mapping of Xenopus 5S genes: Somatic-type versus oocyte-type. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983, 11, 2313–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wormington, W.M.; Schlissel, M.; Brown, D.D. Developmental regulation of Xenopus 5S RNA genes. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1982, 47 Pt 2, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guinta, D.R.; Yun Tso, J.; Narayanswami, S.; Hamkalo, B.A.; Korn, L.J. Early replication and expression of oocyte-type 5S RNA genes in a Xenopus somatic cell line carrying a translocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 5150–5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dennis, H.; Wegnez, M. Oocytes and liver cells of the teleost fish Tinca tinca contain different kinds of 5S rRNA. Devl. Biol. 1977, 59, 228–236. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mashkova, T.D.; Serenkova, T.I.; Mazo, A.M.; Avdonina, T.A.; Timofeyeva, M.Y.; Kisselev, L.L. The primary structure of oocyte and somatic SS rRNAs from the loach Misgurnus fossilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981, 9, 2141–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Martins, C.; Wasko, A.P. Organization and evolution of 5S ribosomal DNA in the fish genome. In Focus on Genome Research; Williams, C.R., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 335–363. [Google Scholar]
  36. Martins, C.; Galetti, P.M., Jr. Organization of 5S rDNA in species of the fish Leporinus: Two different genomic locations are characterized by distinct nontranscribed spacers. Genome 2001, 44, 903–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Martins, C.; Wasko, A.P.; Oliveira, C.; Porto-Foresti, F.; Parise-Maltempi, P.P.; Wright, J.M.; Foresti, F. Dynamics of 5S rDNA in the tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) genome: Repeat units, inverted sequences, pseudogenes and chromosome loci. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2002, 98, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Davidian, A.G.; Dyomin, A.G.; Galkina, S.A.; Makarova, N.E.; Dmitriev, S.E.; Gaginskaya, E.R. 45S rDNA repeats of turtles and crocodiles harbor a functional 5S rRNA gene specifically expressed in oocytes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2022, 39, msab324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Almeida-Toledo, L.; Ozouf-Costaz, C.; Foresti, F.; Bonillo, C.; Porto-Foresti, F.; Daniel-Silva, M. Conservation of the 5S-bearing chromosome pair and co-localization with major rDNA clusters in five species of Astyanax (Pisces, Characidae). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2002, 97, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Fontana, F.; Lanfredi, M.; Congiu, L.; Leis, M.; Chicca, M.; Rossi, R. Chromosomal mapping of 18S–28S and 5S rRNA genes by two-colour fluorescent in situ hybridization in six sturgeon species. Genome 2003, 46, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Pisano, E.; Ghigliotti, L. Ribosomal genes in notothenioid fishes: Focus on the chromosomal organisation. Mar Genom. 2009, 2, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Near, T.J.; Dornburg, A.; Kuhn, K.L.; Eastman, J.T.; Pennington, J.N.; Patarnello, T.; Zane, L.; Fernández, D.A.; Jones, C.D. Ancient climate change, antifreeze, and the evolutionary diversification of Antarctic fishes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3434–3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Duhamel, G.; Hulley, P.-A.; Causse, R.; Koubbi, P.; Vacchi, M.; Pruvost, P. Biogeographic patterns of fish. In Biogeographic atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scentific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 328–362. [Google Scholar]
  44. Auvinet, J.; Graça, P.; Dettai, A.; Amores, A.; Postlethwait, J.H.; Detrich, H.W.; Ozouf-Costaz, C.; Coriton, O.; Higuet, D. Multiple independent chromosomal fusions accompanied the radiation of the Antarctic teleost genus Trematomus (Notothenioidei: Nototheniidae). BMC Evol. Biol. 2020, 20, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wolffe, A.P. The role of transcription factors, chromatin structure and DNA replication in 5S RNA gene regulation. J. Cell Sci. 1994, 107, 2055–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Andronescu, M.; Condon, A.; Hoos, H.H.; Mathews, D.H.; Murphy, K.P. Efficient parameter estimation for RNA secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, i19–i28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Eastman, J.T.; DeVries, A.L. Aspects of body size and gonadal histology in the Antarctic toothfish, Dissostichus mawsoni, from McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Polar Biol. 2000, 23, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Parker, S.J.; Grimes, P.J. Length- and age-at-spawning of Antarctic Toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in the Ross Sea. CCAMLR Sci. 2010, 17, 53–73. [Google Scholar]
  49. Piyanova, S.; Kokorin, N. Cytomorphology of female and male gonads in Antarctic toothfish Dissosctichus mawsoni (Nototheniidae) from the Ross Sea in the summer period. J. Ichthyol. 2010, 50, 374–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Davidson, E.H. Gene Activity in Early Development, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  51. Leesch, F.; Lorenzo-Orts, L.; Pribitzer, C.; Grishkovskaya, I.; Roehsner, J.; Chugunova, A.; Matzinger, M.; Roitinger, E.; Belačić, K.; Kandolf, S.; et al. A molecular network of conserved factors keeps ribosomes dormant in the egg. Nature 2023, 613, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shiokawa, K.; Misumi, Y.; Yamana, K. Demonstration of rRNA synthesis in pre-gastrular embryos of Xenopus laevis. Dev. Growth Differ. 1981, 23, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pardue, M.L.; Brown, D.D.; Birnstiel, M.L. Location of the genes for 5S ribosomal RNA in Xenopus laevis. Chromosoma 1973, 42, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kramer, R.A.; Philippsen, P.; Davis, R.W. Divergent transcription in the yeast ribosomal RNA coding region as shown by hybridization to separated strands and sequence analysis of cloned DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 1978, 123, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Garcia, S.; Kovarïk, A.; Leitch, A.R.; Garnatje, T. Cytogenetic features of rRNA genes across land plants: Analysis of the plant rDNA database. Plant J. 2017, 89, 1020–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vahidi, H.; Curran, J.; Nelson, D.W.; Webster, J.M.; McClure, M.A.; Honda, B.M. Unusual sequences, homologous to 5S RNA, in ribosomal DNA repeats of the nematode Meloidogyne arenaria. J. Mol. Evol. 1988, 27, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Drouin, G. Homogenization of 5S ribosomal genes on the noncoding strand of the rDNA units of two crustacean species. Genome 1999, 42, 150–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Weydmann, A.; Przyłucka, A.; Lubośny, M.; Walczyńska, K.S.; Serrão, E.A.; Pearson, G.A.; Burzyński, A. Mitochondrial genomes of the key zooplankton copepods Arctic Calanus glacialis and North Atlantic Calanus finmarchicus with the longest crustacean non-coding regions. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. McElroy, K.E.; Müller, S.; Lamatsch, D.K.; Bankers, L.; Fields, P.D.; Jalinsky, J.R.; Sharbrough, J.; Boore, J.L.; Logsdon, J.M.; Neiman, M. Asexuality associated with marked genomic expansion of tandemly repeated rRNA and histone genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, msab121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Eickbush, T.H.; Eickbush, D.G. Finely orchestrated movements: Evolution of the ribosomal RNA genes. Genetics 2007, 175, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Auvinet, J.; Graça, P.; Ghigliotti, L.; Pisano, E.; Dettaï, A.; Ozouf-Costaz, C.; Higuet, D. Insertion hot spots of DIRS1 retrotransposon and chromosomal diversifications among the Antarctic Teleosts Nototheniidae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Simões, T.R.; Kammerer, C.F.; Caldwell, M.W.; Pierce, S.E. Successive climate crises in the deep past drove the early evolution and radiation of reptiles. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabq1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tomaszkiewicz, M.; Hautecoeur, M.; Coutanceau, J.-P.; Bonillo, C.; Dettaï, A.; Mazzei, F.; Ghigliotti, L.; Pisano, E.; Couloux, A.; Chanet, B.; et al. Comparative cytogenetic studies of the Nototheniidae (Teleostei: Acanthomorpha) from the Indian (Kerguelen-Heard plateau) and Atlantic (South Georgia, South Sandwich, Falklands/Malvinas, Bouvet Islands) sectors of the Southern Ocean. In The Kerguelen Plateau Marine Ecosystem and Fisheries; Société Française d’Ichtyologie; Duhamel, G., Welsford, D., Eds.; Australian Antarctic Division: Hobart, TAS, Australia, 2011; Volume 35, pp. 109–120. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ghigliotti, L.; Mazzei, F.; Ozouf-Costaz, C.; Bonillo, C.; Williams, R.; Cheng, C.; Pisano, E. The two giant sister species of the Southern Ocean, Dissostichus eleginoides and Dissostichus mawsoni, differ in karyotype and chromosomal pattern of ribosomal RNA genes. Polar Biol. 2007, 30, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mazzei, F.; Ghigliotti, L.; Lecointre, G.; Ozouf-Costaz, C.; Coutanceau, J.; Detrich, W.; Pisano, E. Karyotypes of basal lineages in notothenioid fishes: The genus Bovichtus. Polar Biol. 2006, 29, 1071–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dyomin, A.G.; Koshel, E.I.; Kiselev, A.M.; Saifitdinova, A.F.; Galkina, S.A.; Fukagawa, T.; Gaginskaya, E. Chicken rRNA gene cluster structure. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Katoh, K.; Misawa, K.; Kuma, K.-I.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Ribosomal genes encoding the 18S, 5.8S, 28S, and 5S rRNA, found in WGS contigs of ten Nototheniidae species. NOR-5S rDNA orientation is opposite to 45S rDNA. The NOR-5S rRNA gene is located within a unique region between the IGS internal repeats. Nototheniidae phylogeny is given according to [44].
Figure 1. Ribosomal genes encoding the 18S, 5.8S, 28S, and 5S rRNA, found in WGS contigs of ten Nototheniidae species. NOR-5S rDNA orientation is opposite to 45S rDNA. The NOR-5S rRNA gene is located within a unique region between the IGS internal repeats. Nototheniidae phylogeny is given according to [44].
Ijms 24 07376 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of the canonical 5S rRNA gene (NTS-5S) and the 5S rRNA gene inserted in IGS (NOR-5S) structures. (A) Alignment of NTS-5S and NOR-5S rRNA gene consensus sequences of Nototheniidae fish. Nucleotide substitutions at positions 2, 23, and 112 distinguishing two variants of the 5S gene are highlighted. Components of the internal control region (ICR), namely the A-box, the C-box, and the intermediate element (IE), are outlined with dotted rectangles. (B) Secondary structures of the Nototheniidae consensus NTS-5S and NOR-5S rRNA molecules predicted using the Andronescu’s RNA energy model at +37 °C according to [46]. The different nucleotides in the two 5S rRNA variants are marked in red.
Figure 2. Comparison of the canonical 5S rRNA gene (NTS-5S) and the 5S rRNA gene inserted in IGS (NOR-5S) structures. (A) Alignment of NTS-5S and NOR-5S rRNA gene consensus sequences of Nototheniidae fish. Nucleotide substitutions at positions 2, 23, and 112 distinguishing two variants of the 5S gene are highlighted. Components of the internal control region (ICR), namely the A-box, the C-box, and the intermediate element (IE), are outlined with dotted rectangles. (B) Secondary structures of the Nototheniidae consensus NTS-5S and NOR-5S rRNA molecules predicted using the Andronescu’s RNA energy model at +37 °C according to [46]. The different nucleotides in the two 5S rRNA variants are marked in red.
Ijms 24 07376 g002
Figure 3. Different representation of the NOR-5S and NTS-5S rRNA sequencing reads in different tissue transcriptomes of Dissostichus eleginoides (Dissostichinae). Percentage of total 5S rRNA sequencing reads was calculated from NCBI BioProjects PRJNA511578 data.
Figure 3. Different representation of the NOR-5S and NTS-5S rRNA sequencing reads in different tissue transcriptomes of Dissostichus eleginoides (Dissostichinae). Percentage of total 5S rRNA sequencing reads was calculated from NCBI BioProjects PRJNA511578 data.
Ijms 24 07376 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dyomin, A.; Galkina, S.; Ilina, A.; Gaginskaya, E. Single Copies of the 5S rRNA Inserted into 45S rDNA Intergenic Spacers in the Genomes of Nototheniidae (Perciformes, Actinopterygii). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087376

AMA Style

Dyomin A, Galkina S, Ilina A, Gaginskaya E. Single Copies of the 5S rRNA Inserted into 45S rDNA Intergenic Spacers in the Genomes of Nototheniidae (Perciformes, Actinopterygii). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(8):7376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087376

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dyomin, Alexander, Svetlana Galkina, Arina Ilina, and Elena Gaginskaya. 2023. "Single Copies of the 5S rRNA Inserted into 45S rDNA Intergenic Spacers in the Genomes of Nototheniidae (Perciformes, Actinopterygii)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 8: 7376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087376

APA Style

Dyomin, A., Galkina, S., Ilina, A., & Gaginskaya, E. (2023). Single Copies of the 5S rRNA Inserted into 45S rDNA Intergenic Spacers in the Genomes of Nototheniidae (Perciformes, Actinopterygii). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(8), 7376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087376

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop