Next Article in Journal
A Protocol for Simultaneous In Vivo Imaging of Cardiac and Neuroinflammation in Dystrophin-Deficient MDX Mice Using [18F]FEPPA PET
Previous Article in Journal
An Overview of Factors Affecting the Functional Quality of Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Proteomic Studies of Blood and Vascular Wall in Atherosclerosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Not All Quiet on the Atherosclerosis Front

Department of Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7527; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087527
Submission received: 4 April 2023 / Accepted: 13 April 2023 / Published: 19 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis)
In recent decades, research has identified the key cellular processes that take place during atherosclerotic plaque development and progression, including endothelial dysfunction, inflammation and lipoprotein oxidation, which result in macrophage and mural cell activation, death and necrotic core formation [1]. Nevertheless, many of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these processes are yet to be revealed. Endothelial dysfunction is the earliest sign of atherosclerotic vascular alterations and is already present when the disease is clinically silent and reversible, highlighting the importance of its early detection [2,3]. The concept that cellular activation results in the shedding of cell components, including receptors and adhesion molecules or proteins stored in granules (which can be detected in the circulating blood and used as biomarkers of disease activity), also applies to a more complex form of cellular components: extracellular vesicles (EVs). Because EVs carry components of the cell from which they originate, the activation state of specific cell types can be assessed; however, methodologies to accurately quantify and characterize EVs are not available in all laboratories, and this approach is therefore not useful as a routine diagnostic tool. Moreover, and as Konstantinos Zifkos and colleagues point out [4], EVs are not only biomarkers, but may also transport their contents from one cell to another, thereby acting as initiators and propagators of cellular activation, including that observed in atherosclerosis. Importantly, EVs also hold great potential as therapeutic vectors that can deliver their cargo to sites of injury or to cell types of interest.
Inflammatory processes have long been known to play a key role in atherosclerosis initiation and progression [5]. Disease states associated with chronic, low-grade inflammation are associated with accelerated atherosclerosis progression. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, a chronic autoimmune disease that affects several organs, are also at increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality [6]. However, the experimental analysis of its pathomechanisms is hampered by the lack of specific animal models of the disease. Marczynski and co-workers employ lupus-prone MRL-Faslpr mice [7] to study pathological and functional changes in their vasculature, including vascular and perivascular inflammatory cell infiltrates in the aorta [8]. In addition to demonstrating the usefulness of this model for further research on SLE-associated vascular damage, the authors show that the resulting vascular dysfunction is ameliorated in MRL-Faslpr mice who lack interleukin-6. IL6 is a central cytokine produced by cells of the innate immune system as a result of inflammasome and IL1β activation [9]. As clinical trials using monoclonal antibodies that target IL1β have yielded promising results [10], the findings presented in this pre-clinical study support the possibility that targeting the inflammasome and its downstream effectors could also reduce vascular inflammation in specific patient populations.
One of the histological features of advanced atherosclerotic lesions is the presence of calcification. Vascular calcification is an actively regulated process that involves the osteo-genic transdifferentiation of smooth muscle cells, for example, in response to intraplaque hemorrhage [11,12]. Vascular calcification is not only a complication of atherosclerosis that is associated with plaque instability, but may also actively promote endothelial dysfunction, the earliest sign of vascular disease. In their work, Daria Shiskova and colleagues show that calciprotein particles (that is, colloidal nanoparticles formed via the binding of ionized calcium and phosphate to the mineral chaperone fetuin-A [13]) are internalized by endothelial cells, where they promote the expression of proinflammatory adhesion molecules and the recruitment of monocytes [14].
Although vascular occlusive disease is the most common form of atherosclerosis, up to 10 % of all individuals older than 65 years develop aortic aneurysms [15,16]. The increased activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and the secretion of proteolytic enzymes from inflammatory cells are central components of its pathobiology. The current experimental and clinical evidence on MMPs and their potential as biomarkers in atherosclerosis are summarized by Olejarz, Lacheta and Kubiak-Tomaszewska [17]. Moreover, Jeremy Lagrange and co-workers show that mice who lacked low-density lipoprotein-related protein-8, also known as apolipoprotein E receptor-2, more frequently developed aortic aneurysm ruptures and exhibited increased mortality in response to angiotensin II. Although blood pressure and vascular inflammation did not differ, transplantation experiments suggested the involvement of bone marrow-derived cells, presumably macrophages, in the process [18]. In addition to describing a new mouse model of accelerated aortic aneurysm formation, their findings strengthen the link between inflammation and lipid receptor signaling in atherosclerosis complications.
Atherosclerotic plaque rupture, which can result in platelet activation, arterial thrombosis and obstruction of the coronary or carotid artery, is the pathological correlate underlying myocardial infarction or stroke, which are major complications of advanced atherosclerosis and the main causes of cardiovascular morbidity and death. Evidence that platelet activation is modified by microbiota residing inside the gut is provided by Christoph Reinhardt and his group, who show that platelets isolated from mice who lack gut microbiota from birth are less responsive in terms of adhesion or fibrinogen receptor expression [19]. Platelets are not in direct contact with the gut microbiome, at least in healthy states and in the presence of an intact endothelial cell barrier; however, microbiome factors are cleared into the liver via the portal vein, leading to the increased expression of pathogen-recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptor 2, and the altered expression of coagulation proteins, such as von Willebrand factor [20]. The new data and previous work highlight the importance of the host microbiome as a disease modifier, but also as a therapeutic target, and the central role of the gut–liver axis in atherosclerosis [21,22].
Previous research has documented the contribution of specific cell types, such as endothelial cells, inflammatory cells or platelets and their products, in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. There is increasing evidence that dysfunction of the intrinsic biological pacemakers and molecular clock genes that coordinate cellular processes contributes to the development of vascular disease. Recent data on this topic and the role of circadian rhythm control mechanisms in the progression of atherosclerosis and thrombosis are presented and summarized by Andy Man, Huige Li and Ning Xia [23].
In addition to experimental studies on single disease candidates using mice who lack or overexpress the gene of interest, broader approaches are necessary to delineate pathways or signaling hubs and networks. To achieve this, it is important for researchers to undertake unbiased approaches to determine RNA and protein expression profiles, their temporal and spatial alterations and expression signatures at the single cell level. The results of (and the methodology underlying) proteomic studies on atherosclerosis, particularly the identification of potential biomarkers via the proteomic analysis of blood or vascular wall material from patients with coronary or carotid artery atherosclerosis, are discussed by Ekaterina Mikhailovna Stakhneva, Evgeniia Vitalievna Striukova and Yulia Igorevna Ragino [24]. Further, updates on the key proteins and regulatory pathways in atherosclerotic plaque progression, as well as on novel cellular pathways and effectors, including epigenetic regulation, biophysical factors and microorganisms that affect atherogenesis, are given in a mini-review by Michal Kowara and Agnieszka Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska [25]. The ways in which knowledge derived from experimental and clinical studies can improve patient care and diagnosis are exemplified in a review article by Tommaso Gori that focuses on nitric oxide (NO), a central mediator in vascular function control [26], and current approaches to exogenously delivering or targeting NO signaling pathways for the treatment and prevention of atherosclerosis [27].
In summary, the original research and focused review articles collected in this Special Issue highlight novel mediators, pathways and control mechanisms in the pathobiology of atherosclerosis, and also underline new models and methodologies that can be used to address specific research questions in this area.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Libby, P.; Buring, J.E.; Badimon, L.; Hansson, G.K.; Deanfield, J.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Tokgözoğlu, L.; Lewis, E.F. Atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019, 5, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alexander, Y.; Osto, E.; Schmidt-Trucksäss, A.; Shechter, M.; Trifunovic, D.; Duncker, D.J.; Aboyans, V.; Bäck, M.; Badimon, L.; Cosentino, F.; et al. Endothelial function in cardiovascular medicine: A consensus paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Groups on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Coronary Pathophysiology and Microcirculation, and Thrombosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2021, 117, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Daiber, A.; Steven, S.; Weber, A.; Shuvaev, V.V.; Muzykantov, V.R.; Laher, I.; Li, H.; Lamas, S.; Münzel, T. Targeting vascular (endothelial) dysfunction. Br. J. Pharm. 2017, 174, 1591–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zifkos, K.; Dubois, C.; Schäfer, K. Extracellular Vesicles and Thrombosis: Update on the Clinical and Experimental Evidence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Libby, P.; Pasterkamp, G.; Crea, F.; Jang, I.K. Reassessing the Mechanisms of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gustafsson, J.T.; Simard, J.F.; Gunnarsson, I.; Elvin, K.; Lundberg, I.E.; Hansson, L.O.; Larsson, A.; Svenungsson, E. Risk factors for cardiovascular mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Res. 2012, 14, R46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hickey, M.J. Alterations in leucocyte trafficking in lupus-prone mice: An examination of the MRL/faslpr mouse. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2003, 81, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marczynski, P.; Meineck, M.; Xia, N.; Li, H.; Kraus, D.; Roth, W.; Möckel, T.; Boedecker, S.; Schwarting, A.; Weinmann-Menke, J. Vascular Inflammation and Dysfunction in Lupus-Prone Mice-IL-6 as Mediator of Disease Initiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ridker, P.M. From C-Reactive Protein to Interleukin-6 to Interleukin-1: Moving Upstream To Identify Novel Targets for Atheroprotection. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ridker, P.M.; Everett, B.M.; Thuren, T.; MacFadyen, J.G.; Chang, W.H.; Ballantyne, C.; Fonseca, F.; Nicolau, J.; Koenig, W.; Anker, S.D.; et al. Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1119–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kolodgie, F.D.; Gold, H.K.; Burke, A.P.; Fowler, D.R.; Kruth, H.S.; Weber, D.K.; Farb, A.; Guerrero, L.J.; Hayase, M.; Kutys, R.; et al. Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 2316–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tziakas, D.N.; Chalikias, G.; Pavlaki, M.; Kareli, D.; Gogiraju, R.; Hubert, A.; Böhm, E.; Stamoulis, P.; Drosos, I.; Kikas, P.; et al. Lysed Erythrocyte Membranes Promote Vascular Calcification. Circulation 2019, 139, 2032–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kutikhin, A.G.; Feenstra, L.; Kostyunin, A.E.; Yuzhalin, A.E.; Hillebrands, J.-L.; Krenning, G. Calciprotein Particles. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2021, 41, 1607–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shishkova, D.; Markova, V.; Sinitsky, M.; Tsepokina, A.; Velikanova, E.; Bogdanov, L.; Glushkova, T.; Kutikhin, A. Calciprotein Particles Cause Endothelial Dysfunction under Flow. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lindholt, J.S.; Juul, S.; Fasting, H.; Henneberg, E.W. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: Single centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005, 330, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Norman, P.E.; Jamrozik, K.; Lawrence-Brown, M.M.; Le, M.T.; Spencer, C.A.; Tuohy, R.J.; Parsons, R.W.; Dickinson, J.A. Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ 2004, 329, 1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Olejarz, W.; Łacheta, D.; Kubiak-Tomaszewska, G. Matrix Metalloproteinases as Biomarkers of Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lagrange, J.; Finger, S.; Kossmann, S.; Garlapati, V.; Ruf, W.; Wenzel, P. Angiotensin II Infusion Leads to Aortic Dissection in LRP8 Deficient Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kiouptsi, K.; Jäckel, S.; Wilms, E.; Pontarollo, G.; Winterstein, J.; Karwot, C.; Groß, K.; Jurk, K.; Reinhardt, C. The Commensal Microbiota Enhances ADP-Triggered Integrin αIIbβ3 Activation and von Willebrand Factor-Mediated Platelet Deposition to Type I Collagen. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jäckel, S.; Kiouptsi, K.; Lillich, M.; Hendrikx, T.; Khandagale, A.; Kollar, B.; Hörmann, N.; Reiss, C.; Subramaniam, S.; Wilms, E.; et al. Gut microbiota regulate hepatic von Willebrand factor synthesis and arterial thrombus formation via Toll-like receptor-2. Blood 2017, 130, 542–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Witkowski, M.; Weeks, T.L.; Hazen, S.L. Gut Microbiota and Cardiovascular Disease. Circ. Res. 2020, 127, 553–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roberts, A.B.; Gu, X.; Buffa, J.A.; Hurd, A.G.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, W.; Gupta, N.; Skye, S.M.; Cody, D.B.; Levison, B.S.; et al. Development of a gut microbe-targeted nonlethal therapeutic to inhibit thrombosis potential. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1407–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Man, A.W.C.; Li, H.; Xia, N. Circadian Rhythm: Potential Therapeutic Target for Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stakhneva, E.M.; Striukova, E.V.; Ragino, Y.I. Proteomic Studies of Blood and Vascular Wall in Atherosclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kowara, M.; Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska, A. Pathophysiology of Atherosclerotic Plaque Development-Contemporary Experience and New Directions in Research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Murad, F. Discovery of Some of the Biological Effects of Nitric Oxide and its Role in Cell Signaling. Biosci. Rep. 2005, 24, 452–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gori, T. Exogenous NO Therapy for the Treatment and Prevention of Atherosclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schäfer, K. Not All Quiet on the Atherosclerosis Front. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087527

AMA Style

Schäfer K. Not All Quiet on the Atherosclerosis Front. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(8):7527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087527

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schäfer, Katrin. 2023. "Not All Quiet on the Atherosclerosis Front" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 8: 7527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087527

APA Style

Schäfer, K. (2023). Not All Quiet on the Atherosclerosis Front. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(8), 7527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087527

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop