Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of the Role of Purinergic Signalling Pathway in the Treatment of COVID-19
Next Article in Special Issue
Immunotherapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme: Mechanism and Clinical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanisms of Phytochemicals in Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Clinical Utility of lncRNAs and Their Application as Molecular Biomarkers in Breast Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms24097862
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Facile Synthesis and Molecular Characterization of Certain New Anti-Proliferative Indole-Based Chemical Entities

by
Reem I. Al-Wabli
*,
Iman S. Issa
,
Maha S. Al-mutairi
,
Aliyah A. Almomen
and
Mohamed I. Attia
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 7862; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097862
Submission received: 9 March 2023 / Revised: 6 April 2023 / Accepted: 24 April 2023 / Published: 26 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Biological Molecules for Cancer Treatments 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cancer cells frequently develop drug resistance, which leads to chemotherapeutic treatment failure. Additionally, chemotherapies are hindered by their high toxicity. Therefore, the development of new chemotherapeutic drugs with improved clinical outcomes and low toxicity is a major priority. Several indole derivatives exhibit distinctive anti-cancer mechanisms which have been associated with various molecular targets. In this study, target compounds 4a–q were obtained through the reaction of substituted benzyl chloride with hydrazine hydrate, which produces benzyl hydrazine. Subsequently, the appropriate substituted benzyl hydrazine was allowed to react with 1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid or 5-methoxy-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide as a coupling agent. All compounds exhibited cytotoxicity in three cell lines, namely, MCF-7, A549, and HCT. Compound 4e exhibited the highest cytotoxicity, with an average IC50 of 2 µM. Moreover, a flow cytometry study revealed a significantly increased prevalence of Annexin-V and 7-AAD positive cell populations. Several derivatives of 4a–q showed moderate to high cytotoxicity against the tested cell lines, with compound 4e having the highest cytotoxicity, indicating that it may possess potential apoptosis-inducing capabilities.

1. Introduction

Cancer, a major causes of mortality worldwide, affects billions of people annually [1]. Despite significant progress in the development of new anticancer drugs, several drawbacks, including low efficacy, high toxicity and drug resistance, affect the outcomes of treatment [2]. Therefore, many researchers aim to develop new anticancer drugs with superior clinical outcomes and a safer profile.
Heterocyclic compounds have a broad range of biological activities and play important roles in medicinal chemistry. In the field of drug discovery, the indole ring is considered an imperative building block owing to its versatile chemistry and wide range of biological functions, including antimicrobial, antiviral, anticonvulsant, analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Several commercially available potent anticancer drug molecules, such as the natural vinca alkaloids vinblastine and vincristine, contain the indole ring [10]. Additionally, Cediranib is a potent tyrosine kinases receptor inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [11], and Panobinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor belonging to the hydroxamic acid class [12].
A literature review has revealed that the distinctive molecular mechanisms regulating the anticancer properties are associated with various molecular targets. Some of the indole derivatives inhibit tubulin polymerization, and induce apoptosis in cancer cells [13,14,15,16]. However, other derivatives were found that inhibit protein kinases, such as casein kinase 2 (CK2), tyrosine kinases (TrK), and cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK), as well as vascular endothelial growth factor-2 (VEGFR). Furthermore, indoles can induce apoptosis via the inhibition of Mcl-1, Bcl-2, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP), which prevents DNA repair. It also exhibits anticancer effects by suppressing DNA topoisomerases, aromatases, and histone deacetylases (HDAC) [9,17,18,19,20].
Therefore, compounds containing indole moieties exhibit different mechanisms of action involving multiple targets during cell replication and proliferation. Considering this, and in continuation of ousr previous research on new potent anti-proliferative compounds [21,22], in this study we aimed to synthesize indole backbone molecules tethered with free rotating substituted benzyl moieties 4a–q. The flexibility of the molecules is a modality for obtaining a number of bioactive confirmations, and hence increasing the likelihood of obtaining new bioactive compounds with effective anti-proliferative properties.

2. Results and Discussions

2.1. Chemistry

The synthetic pathway used to prepare the target compounds 4a–q is depicted in Scheme 1. Commercially available substituted benzyl chloride 1 was allowed to react with hydrazine hydrate in ethanol to give benzyl hydrazine 2. Subsequently, the title compounds 4a–q were achieved by reacting the appropriate substituted benzyl hydrazine with 1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid or 5-methoxy-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid in dichloromethane using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI) as a coupling agent. The direct conversion of a carboxylic acid to an amide is difficult because amines are very basic and tend to convert carboxylic acids to their highly unreactive carboxylate ions. Therefore, EDCI as a coupling agent was used to drive this reaction by forming a good leaving group which could then be displaced by an amine during the addition elimination reaction [23]. The nucleophilic attack happened due to the secondary amine rather than the primary amine of the hydrazine terminal, which led to the formation of the sole product in the target compounds 4a–q. The assigned structures were confirmed by 1HNMR, 13CNMR, ESI-MS, and X-ray crystallography.
The 1H-NMR spectra of the target compounds 4a–q showed D2O exchangeable singlet peaks integrated for two protons in the range of δ 4.81–5.03 ppm assigned for the NH2. Other singlets integrated for two protons in the range of δ 4.91–5.34 ppm were noticed for the benzylic CH2. Meanwhile, compounds 4b, 4d, 4f, 4h, 4j, 4l, 4n, 4p, and 4q showed singlets at around δ = 3.76 ppm, representing three protons of the indole -OCH3 group. Compound 4q exhibited a singlet at δ = 2.30 ppm, which was assigned to be for the three protons of the CH3 group. The aromatic protons were observed in the region of δ = 6.84–8.25 ppm. Moreover, the indole NH appeared as singlets integrated for one proton in the range δ = 11.36–11.55 ppm, whereas the 13C-NMR spectra of the target compounds 4a–q exhibited signals in the range of δ = 54.0–55.6 ppm, indicating carbons of the benzylic CH2. The methyl carbons of compound 4q were observed at δ = 21.2 ppm, and the indole methoxy carbon for compounds 4b, 4d, 4f, 4h, 4j, 4l, 4n, 4p, and 4q resonated at δ = 55.7 ppm. Moreover, the aromatic carbons appeared in the range of δ = 102.4–158.9 ppm while the amide carbonyl carbon appeared at about δ 163 ppm.

2.2. Antiproliferative Activity

The title compounds 4a–q were subjected to MTT assay to determine their cytotoxicity, and their in vitro antiproliferative activity was examined as well. The cancer cell growth inhibitory activity of the synthesized compound was tested against three human cancer cell lines, namely, breast cancer (MCF-7), colon cancer (HCT116) and lung cancer (A549), as well as non-tumorigenic human lung cell line (WI38) to estimate the selectivity for tumor cells. Staurosporine was used as a reference drug.
All the title compounds 4a–q were evaluated for their quantitative inhibitory concentration 50% (IC50), and the results are depicted in Table 1 and Figure 1. It was obvious from the results that several derivatives showed moderate to high cytotoxicities. Compounds 4b, 4h, and 4a showed moderate cytotoxicities, with IC50s 11.5, 13.1, and 21.7 µM, respectively, against MCF-7, while for compounds 4j, 4f, 4g, 4m, and 4p, IC50s were 9.16, 9.79, 12.3, 17.5, and 19.4 µM, respectively, against HCT116 and compounds 4i, 4m,4n, 4g, and 4h IC50s; 11.6, 12.9, 16.7, 17.0, and 23.9 µM, respectively, compared to Staurasporine against the same cell line (IC50s: 11.1, 7.02, and 8.42 µM, respectively).
Furthermore, it appeared that compounds 4e, 4q, 4d, 4j, 4o, 4g, and 4k revealed high cytotoxicities against MCF-7 with IC50s (0.57, 1.01, 3.23, 3.27, 3.66, 8.31, and 9.21 µM, respectively). Additionally, compounds 4e, 4o, 4l, and 4q with IC50s (1.95, 2.41, 5.02, and 6.45 µM, respectively) were found to be superior to staurasporine against HCT116, while compounds 4q, 4k, 4p, 4e, 4d, 4a, and 4f displayed significant cytotoxicities against A549 (IC50s, 2.4, 2.65, 3.02, 3.49, 5.69, 5.9, and 8.33 µM, respectively).
Among the tested target compounds, 4e and 4q showed excellent cytotoxicity with average IC50s of 2 ± 1.2 and 3.28 ± 2.3 µM, respectively (Table 1, Figure 1). However, compound 4e exhibited less toxicity on normal cells (WI-38) in comparison to 4q (Figure 2), 87.2 ± 4.94 and 56.2 ± 3.18, respectively, and thus was chosen for further investigation.

2.3. Flowcytometry

Since a paramount goal for anticancer agents is to induce apoptosis and cause malfunctions in the DNA, flowcytometry was conducted in this study for compound 4e and the results (Figure 3) depicted a significant increase in Annexin-V and 7-AAD positive cell populations, which indicated that compound 4e harbors potential apoptosis-inducing capabilities.

2.4. Cell Cycle Arrest

To evaluate if the antiproliferative effect of 4e was due to the disturbance of the cell cycle, cells were treated with 10 µm for 48 h. Results show that there was an increase in the cell population in the S phase (48.72%) compared to control (34.72%) in MCF-7 cells, about a 1.04-fold increase (Figure 4). Therefore, it is possible that the antiproliferative effect of 4e is due to S-phase cell cycle arrest.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General

The melting points were measured using a Gallenkamp melting point device and are uncorrected. The NMR samples of the synthesized compounds 4a–q were dissolved in DMSO-d6, and the NMR spectra were recorded using a Bruker NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Reinstetten, Germany) at 500/700 MHz for 1H and 125.76/175 MHz for 13C at the Research Center, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. TMS was used as an internal standard, and chemical shift values were recorded in ppm on the δ scale. The 1H NMR spectral data are represented as follows: chemical shifts, multiplicity (s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; and m, multiplet), and number of protons. The 13C NMR spectral data were represented as chemical shifts and type of carbon. Mass spectra were measured on an Agilent Quadrupole 6120 LC/MS with ESI (electrospray ionization) source (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Elemental analysis was carried out at the Microanalysis Laboratory, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, using an Elemental C, H, N analyzer Vario EL III, Germany, and the results agreed favorably with the proposed structures within ±0.4% of the theoretical values. Silica gel thin layer chromatography (TLC) plates from Merck, Burlington, MA, USA (silica gel precoated aluminum plates with fluorescent indicator at 254 nm) were used for thin layer chromatography. Visualization was performed by illumination with a UV light source (254 nm). Cell line cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection, and cells were cultured using DMEM (Invitrogen/Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% Hyclone FBS, 10 ug/mL of insulin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. All of the other chemicals and reagents were from Sigma or Invitrogen.

3.2. Chemistry

3.2.1. General Method for the Synthesis of Substituted Benzyl Hydrazine 3

The appropriate benzyl chloride (0.01 mol) dissolved in 8 mL absolute ethanol was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 98% hydrazine hydrate (6 mL, 0.12 mol) in 12 mL absolute ethanol, and the resulting mixture continued to be stirred at room temperature for 24 h. Then, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, 0.12 mL of aqueous solution 50% NaOH was added to the residue, and the resulting mixture was extracted by diethyl ether (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and then concentrated to afford benzyl hydrazine with 60–80 yield %, which was used in the next step without further purification.

3.2.2. General Method for the Synthesis of the Target Compounds 4a–q

A mixture of indole-2-carboxylic acid 3 (0.25 g, 1.55 mmol) and EDCI (0.3 g, 1.55 mmol) in methylene chloride (5 mL) was stirred for about 10 min until a clear solution was obtained. Substituted benzyl hydrazine 2 (1.55 mmol) dissolved in methylene chloride (5 mL) was added to the mixture and stirred for 24 h. The mixture was washed successively with water (2 × 20 mL), 10% NaHCO3 solution (2 × 15 mL), and water (2 × 15 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated. The formed precipitate was collected and re-crystallized from ethanol to yield the corresponding 4a–q.
N-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4a: beige powder m.p. 233 °C (yield; 0.26 g, 56%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3348 (NH2asym.), 3280 (NH2sym.), 3061 (C-H, aromatic), 2950 (C-H, aliphatic), 1701 (C=O), 1560, 1163, 748; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 4.85 (s, 2H, NH2), 5.06 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.01–7.04 (m, 1H, Har), 7.17–7.20 (m, 1H, Har), 7.37 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Har), 7.44 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Har), 7.49 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 7.61 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, Har), 11.50 (s, 1H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.0 (CH2), 112.8, 120.0, 122.1, 123.9, 127.4, 128.9, 130.4, 132.3, 136.3, 136.5, 162.7 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 297.8 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. For C16H14ClN3O: C, 64.11; H, 4.71; N, 14.02; found: C, 64.35; H, 4.70; N, 13.99.
N-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-5-methoxy-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4b: white powder m.p. 225 °C (yield; 0.37 g, 86%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3315 (NH2asym.), 3250 (NH2sym.), 3100 (C-H, aromatic), 2970 (C-H, aliphatic), 1690 (C=O), 1585, 796; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 3.75 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.84 (s, 2H, NH2), 5.04 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.85 (m, 1H, Har), 7.07 (s, 1H, Har), 7.37 (m, 4H, Har), 7.44 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Har), 11.37 (s, 1H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (175 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.0 (CH2), 55.6 (OCH3), 102.2, 108.9, 113.5, 115.4, 127.6, 128.9, 130.4, 131.0, 131.7, 132.3, 136.5, 154.2 (C-O), 162.6 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 327.8 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C17H16ClN3O2: C, 61.91; H, 4.89; N, 12.74; found: C, 61.67; H, 4.90; N, 12.73.
N-Benzyl-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4c: white powder m.p. 237 °C (yield; 0.144 g, 35 %); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3313 (NH2asym.), 3280 (NH2sym.), 3100 (C-H, aromatic), 2980 (C-H, aliphatic), 1680 (C=O), 1585, 744; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 4.88 (s, 2H, NH2), 5.00 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.26 (t, 1H, J = 7 Hz, Har), 7.18 (t, 1H, J = 7 Hz, Har), 7.31–7.39 (m, 5H, Har), 7.49 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 7.62 (d, 1H, J = 7 Hz, Har), 11.50 (s, 1H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.5 (CH2), 112.8, 119.9, 122.1, 123.8, 127.5, 127.7, 128.4, 129.0, 136.3, 137.4, 162.6 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 263.8 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. For C16H15N3O: C, 72.43; H, 5.70; N, 15.84; found: C, 72.45; H, 5.67; N, 15.83.
N-Benzyl-5-methoxy-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4d: beige powder m.p. 210 °C (yield; 0.143 g, 37 %); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3331 (NH2asym.), 3290 (NH2sym.), 3100 (C-H, aromatic), 2950 (C-H, aliphatic), 1670 (C=O), 1585, 744; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 3.76 (s, 1H, OCH3), 4.81 (s, 2H, NH2), 4.91 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.83 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 9Hz, Har), 7.07 (s, 1H, Har), 7.18–7.24 (m, 5H, Har), 7.39 (d, 2H, J = 7Hz), 11.63 (s, 1 H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) ppm: 55.6 (CH2), 55.7(OCH3), 102.7, 113.7, 110.5, 116.4, 127.8, 128.0, 129.6, 132.3, 135.0, 136.0, 142.7, 154.3, 162.5 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 293.9 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C17H17N3O2: C, 69.14; H, 5.80; N, 14.23; found: C, 69.02; H, 5.82; N, 14.25.
N-(3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4e: white powder m.p. 204 °C (yield; 0.261g, 42%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3332 (NH2asym.), 3228 (NH2sym.), 3100 (C-H, aromatic), 2940 (C-H, aliphatic), 1670 (C=O), 1521, 1178, 1130, 744; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 5.02 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.34 (s, 2 H, NH2exchang.), 7.03 (t, 1 H, J = 7 Hz, Har), 7.18–7.19 (t, 1 H, Har), 7.49 (2 H, J = 7 Hz, Har), 7.63 (d, 1 H, J = 7 Hz, Har), 8.05 (s, 3 H, Har), 11.55 (s, 1 H, NH-indole-exchang.); 13C NMR (175 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.8 (-CH2), 109.3, 112.9, 119.9, 121.5, 124.0, 126.2, 127.5, 129.4, 130.3, 130.4, 130.6, 130.8, 131.0, 136.3, 141.3, 163.0 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 399.9 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C18H13F6N3O: C, 53.87; H, 3.27; N, 10.47; found: C, 54.06; H, 3.26; N, 10.49.
N-(3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-5-methoxy-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4f: white powder m.p. 195 °C (yield; 0.215 g, 38%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3342 (NH2asym.), 3200 (NH2sym.), 3149 (C-H, aromatic), 2937 (C-H, aliphatic), 1640 (C=O), 1521, 1165, 1138, 740; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 3.76 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 5.01 (s, 2 H, NH2), 5.32 (s, 2 H, CH2), 6.84–6.87 (m, 1 H, Har), 7.08 (s, 1 H, Har), 7.39 (d, 2 H, J = 5 Hz, Har), 8.03 (s, 3 H, Har), 11.43 (s, 1 H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.8 (-CH2), 55.7 (OCH3), 102.4, 113.7, 115.3, 121.5, 122.8, 125.0, 127.6, 129.4, 130.6, 130.8, 131.8, 141.4, 154.1, 163.0(C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 429.8 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C19H15F6N3O2: C, 52.91; H, 3.51; N, 9.74; found: C, 52.71; H, 3.52; N, 9.74.
N-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide beige powder 4g: m.p. 209 °C (yield; 0.228 g, 52%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3315 (NH2asym.), 3280 (NH2sym.), 3050 (C-H, aromatic), 2937 (C-H, aliphatic), 1647(C=O), 1517, 1151, 746; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 4.85 (s, 2 H, NH2), 5.03 (s, 2 H, CH2), 7.01–7.04 (t, 1 H, J = 7 Hz, Har), 7.17–7.23 (m, 3 H, Har), 7.39–7.41 (m, 2 H, Har), 7.49 (d, 2H, J = 7 Hz), 7.61 (d, 1 H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 11.49 (s, 1 H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (175 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 55.0 (-CH2), 109.4, 112.8, 115.7, 115.9, 119.9, 122.0, 123.9, 127.5, 130.6, 133.5, 136.3, 161.0, 162.6 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 281.9 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C16H14FN3O: C, 67.3; H, 4.98; N, 14.83; found: C, 67.08; H, 4.99; N, 14.86.
N-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-5-methoxy-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4h: beige powder m.p. 175 °C (yield; 0.225 g, 52%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3338 (NH2asym.), 3209 (NH2sym.), 3116 (C-H, aromatic), 2964 (C-H, aliphatic), 1635 (C=O), 1527, 1155, 754; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 3.76 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 4.84 (s, 2 H, NH2), 5.00 (s, 2 H, CH2), 6.84–6.86 (m, 1 H, Har), 7.07 (s, 1 H, Har), 7.19–7.22 (m, 2 H, Har), 7.38–7.39 (m, 4 H, Har), 11.36 (s, 1 H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 53.9 (-CH2), 55.7 (OCH3), 102.4, 113.7, 115.1, 115.6, 115.8, 127.7, 130.5, 131.7, 133.7, 154.0, 162.5 (C-O), 163.1 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 311.9 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C17H16FN3O2: C, 65.17; H, 5.15; N, 13.41; found: C, 65.36; H, 5.17; N, 13.36.
N-(4-(Trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4i: white powder m.p. 190 °C (yield; 0.255 g, 43%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3334 (NH2asym.), 3210 (NH2sym.), 3100 (C-H, aromatic), 2937 (C-H, aliphatic), 1658 (C=O), 1564, 1112, 745; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 4.97 (NH2), 5.15 (CH2), 7.03 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, Har), 7.193 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, Har), 7.50 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 7.56 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, Har), 7.62 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 7.70 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 11.52 (s, 1H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (175 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.0 (CH2), 109.4, 112.8, 119.9, 122.1, 123.9, 124.0, 125.9, 127.5, 128.2, 128.4, 129.1, 130.4, 136.4, 142.4, 162.8 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 331.9 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C17H14F3N3O: C, 61.26; H, 4.23; N, 12.61; found: C, 61.38; H, 4.21; N, 12.60.
N-(4-(Trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-5-methoxy-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4j: white powder m.p. 220 °C (yield; 0.21 g, 45%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3332 (NH2asym.), 3270 (NH2sym.), 3050 (C-H, aromatic), 2940 (C-H, aliphatic), 1600 (C=O), 1521, 1112, 805; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 3.76 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 4.95 (s, 2 H, NH2), 5.13 (s, 2 H, CH2), 6.85 (dd, 1 H, J = 2, 9 Hz, Har), 7.08 (s, 1H, Har), 7.40 (d, 2 H, J = 8.5 Hz, Har), 7.56 (d, 2 H, J = 7.5 Hz, Har), 7.75 (d, 2 H, J = 7.5 Hz, Har), 11.40 (s, 1 H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.5 (CH2), 55.7 (OCH3), 102.4, 113.7, 115.2, 123.8, 125.8, 127.7, 128.2, 128.5, 129.0, 130.9, 131.8, 142.5, 154.1, 162.7 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 36 1.9 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C18H16F3N3O2: C, 59.50; H, 4.44; N, 11.57; found: C, 59.42; H, 4.45; N, 11.56.
N-(4-Cyanobenzyl)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4k: white powder m.p. 202 °C (yield; 0.315 g, 70%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3379 (NH2asym.), 3311 (NH2sym.), 3047 (C-H, aromatic), 2922 (C-H, aliphatic), 2223 (CN), 1647 (C=O), 1523, 740; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 4.95 (s, 2 H, NH2), 5.17 (s, 2 H, CH2), 7.01–7.03 (m, 1H, Har), 7.18–7.21 (m, 1H, Har), 7.50 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Har), 7.53 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 7.62 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, Har), 7.86 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 11.52 (s, 1H, NH-indole);13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.8 (CH2), 110.4, 112.8, 119.4, 120.0, 122.1, 123.9, 130.4, 132.9, 136.4, 143.6, 162.9 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 288.9 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C17H14N4O: C, 70.33; H, 4.86; N, 19.30; found: C, 70.05; H, 4.88; N, 19.36.
N-(4-Cyanobenzyl)-5-methoxy-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4l: white powder m.p. 248 °C (yield; 0.311 g, 74%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3390 (NH2asym.), 3331(NH2sym.), 3060 (C-H, aromatic), 2972 (C-H, aliphatic), 2227 (CN), 1647 (C=O), 1517, 750; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 3.76 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 4.94 (s, 2H, NH2), 5.16 (s, 2 H, CH2), 6.86 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 9 Hz, Har), 7.08 (s, 1H, Har), 7.40 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Har), 7.53 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 7.85 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Har),11.39 (s, 1H, NH-indole);13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.8 (CH2), 55.7 (OCH3), 102.4, 108.9, 110.4, 113.7, 115.3, 119.4, 127.7, 129.2, 131.8, 132.9, 143.6, 154.1, 162.8 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 318.9 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C18H16N4O2: C, 67.49; H, 5.03; N, 17.49; found: C, 67.28; H, 5.03; N, 17.54.
N-(4-Bromobenzyl)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide beige powder 4m: m.p. 238 °C (yield; 0.133 g, 25%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3334 (NH2asym.), 3210 (NH2sym.), 3050 (C-H, aromatic), 2960 (C-H, aliphatic), 1637 (C=O), 1521, 788, 750; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 4.84 (s, 2 H, NH2), 5.05 (s, 2 H, CH2), 7.03 (m, 1 H, Har), 7.19 (m, 1H, Har), 7.31 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 7.49–7.62 (m, 5H, Har), 11.45 (s, 1H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.7 (CH2), 112.8, 119.9, 120.8, 122.1, 123.9, 127.5, 130.7, 131.3, 131.5, 131.9, 136.4, 136.9, 162.7 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 341.9 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C16H14BrN3O: C, 55.83; H, 4.10; N, 12.21; found: C, 55.97; H, 4.11; N, 12.15.
N-(4-Bromobenzyl)-5-methoxy-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4n: beige powder m.p. 228 °C (yield; 0.157 g, 32%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3415 (NH2asym.), 3331(NH2sym.), 3050 (C-H, aromatic), 2926 (C-H, aliphatic),1640 (C=O), 1519, 792, 750; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 3.76 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 4.83 (s, 2 H, NH2), 5.04 (s, 2 H, CH2), 6.85 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.5, 9 Hz, Har), 7.08 (s, 1 H, Har), 7.31 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 7.39 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, Har), 7.58 (d, 2 H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 11.40 (s, 1H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.1 (CH2), 55.7 (OCH3), 102.4, 113.7, 115.2, 120.8, 127.6, 130.8, 131.0, 131.7, 131.9, 137.0, 154.0, 162.6 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 372.8 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C17H16BrN3O2: C, 54.56; H, 4.31; N, 11.23; found: C, 54.55; H, 4.30; N, 11.26.
N-(4-Nitrobenzyl)-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4o: yellow powder m.p. 223 °C (yield; 0.37 g, 77%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3336 (NH2asym.), 3250 (NH2sym.), 3070 (C-H, aromatic), 2940 (C-H, aliphatic), 1630 (C=O), 1593, 1517, 1348, 746; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 4.99 (s, 2H, NH2), 5.19 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.03 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, Har), 7.19 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, Har), 7.49 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 7.61 (d, 3H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 8.25 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Har), 11.52 (s, 1H, NH-indole); 13C NMR (175 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.5 (CH2), 109.2, 112.8, 120.2, 122.1, 123.9, 124.1, 127.5, 129.7, 130.4, 147.2, 162.9 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 308.9 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C16H14N4O3: C, 61.93; H, 4.55; N, 18.06; found: C, 61.88; H, 4.56; N, 18.13.
N-(4-Nitrobenzyl)-5-methoxy-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4p: yellow powder m.p. 213 °C (yield; 0.285 g, 64%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3394 (NH2asym.), 3317 (NH2sym.), 3060 (C-H, aromatic), 2950 (C-H, aliphatic), 1654 (C=O), 1589, 1517, 1348, 750;1H NMR (700 Hz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 3.76 (s, 3H, -OCH3), 4.99 (s, 2H, NH2), 5.18 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.85 (dd, 1H, J = 2, 9 Hz, Har), 7.08 (s, 1H, Har), 7.39 (d, 2H, J = 9Hz, Har), 7.60 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Har), 8.25 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Har), 11.40 (s, 1H, NH-indole). 13C NMR (175 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 54.1 (CH2), 55.7 (-OCH3), 102.1, 109.1, 113.7, 115.3, 124.1, 127.6, 129.4, 130.8, 131.8, 147.2, 145.8, 154.1, 162.8 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 338.9 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C17H16N4O4: C, 59.99; H, 4.74; N, 16.46; found: C, 59.94; H, 4.74; N, 16.50.
N-(4-Methylbenzyl)-5-methoxy-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4q: beige powder m.p. 166 °C (yield; 0.122 g, 30%); IR (KBr): ν (cm−1) 3309 (NH2asym), 3230 (NH2sym.), 3050 (C-H, aromatic), 2920 (C-H, aliphatic), 1577, 1570 (C=N), 1494, 1450, 750; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 2.30 (s, 3H, -CH3), 3.76 (s, 3H, -OCH3), 4.81 (s, 2H, NH2), 4.91 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.84 (dd, 1H, J = 1.5, 6.5, Har), 7.19 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Har), 7.23 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Har), 7.38 (m, 3H, Har), 11.36 (s, 1H, NH-indole). 13C NMR (175 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm: 21.2 (-CH3), 54.3 (CH2), 55.7 (OCH3), 102.3, 108.9, 113.7, 115.0, 127.5, 127.6, 128.6, 129.3, 129.6, 131.2, 131.7, 134.2, 136.9, 154.0, 162.6 (C=O); MS m/z (ESI): 308 [M − H]+; anal. calcd. for C18H19N3O2: C, 69.88; H, 6.19; N, 13.58; found: C, 70.04; H, 6.17; N, 13.54.

3.3. MTT Assay

Anti-proliferative activity in compounds 4a–q were tested in three cancerous cell lines (MCF-7 breast cancer cells, A549 lung carcinoma, HCT human colon cancer cells) and in WI-38 human lung fibroblast cells. Cells were plated at a density of 1.2–1.8 × 10,000 cells/well in a volume of 100 µL complete growth medium and were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Cells were then treated with serially diluted tested compound and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Twenty microliters of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (2.5 mg/mL) dissolved in PBS were added to the cells and cells were further incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. To dissolve formazan crystals, MTT solutions were completely removed and 100 μL DMSO was added. The absorbance was detected at 540 nm using a Spectramax 250 microplate reader (Molecular device, San Jose, CA, USA), and viability (%) was calculated as [optical density (OD) of treated group/OD of control group] × 100.

3.4. Flow Cytometry

To detect the apoptotic potential of our compound of choice, 4e, an Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (BioVision, Mountain View, CA, USA) was used based on the manufacturer’s protocol using a dose of 10 μm for 48 h.

3.5. Cell Cycle Arrest

To detect cell cycle status after treating cells with 4e, 1 × 106 cells were cultured in six-well plates for twenty-four hours per cell and were then treated with 10 μm of 4e for 48 h. Cells were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline. Cells were then fixed with 70% of cold ethanol and kept at 4 °C overnight. Cell analysis was then analyzed following the manifacorere protocol, using a Propidium Iodide Flow Cytometry Kit for Cell Cycle Analysis (Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA).

4. Conclusions

Herein, we reported the design and synthesis of a series of substituted-N-benzyl-1H-indole-2-carbohydrazide 4a–q. All the synthesized compounds were tested for their antiproliferative activity against three cancer cell lines, namely, MCF-7, A549, and HCT using an MTT assay. Several compounds showed moderate to high cytotoxicities with IC50, similar or superior to the reference drug Staurosporine. In particular, compound 4e was the most active congener from the series, with IC50s as low as 0.57, 1.95, and 3.49 µM, respectively, against MCF7, HCT116, and A549 compared to the IC50s of Staurosporine (11.1, 7.02, and 8.42 µM, respectively). Additionally, the selectivity of all the series were evaluated against a non-tumorigenic cell line (WI38), and compound 4e exhibited selectivity toward cancer cells. Finally, flow cytometry suggested that compound 4e harbors potential apoptosis-inducing capabilities. Based on the findings, compound 4e seems to be a promising lead compound for further investigation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24097862/s1. The 1HNMR and 13CNMR of compound 4e and 4f as a representative example are available in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

M.I.A. and R.I.A.-W. proposed the work. I.S.I. synthesized the target compounds 4a–q. M.S.A.-m. contributed the spectroscopic identification and reviewed the manuscript. A.A.A. interpreted the in vitro cytotoxicity evaluation and reviewed the manuscript. R.I.A.-W. prepared the manuscript for publication. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia, through the project no. (IFKSURG-649).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia, for funding this research work through the project no. (IFKSURG-649).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Akhtar, J.; Khan, A.A.; Ali, Z.; Haider, R.; Yar, M.S. Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR) Study and Design Strategies of Nitrogen-Containing Heterocyclic Moieties for Their Anticancer Activities. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 125, 143–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Al-Wabli, R.I.; Alsulami, M.A.; Bukhari, S.I.; Moubayed, N.M.S.; Al-Mutairi, M.S.; Attia, M.I. Design, Synthesis, and Antimicrobial Activity of Certain New Indole-1,2,4 Triazole Conjugates. Molecules 2021, 26, 2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, M.Z.; Chen, Q.; Yang, G.F. A Review on Recent Developments of Indole-Containing Antiviral Agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 89, 421–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Angelova, V.T.; Rangelov, M.; Todorova, N.; Dangalov, M.; Andreeva-Gateva, P.; Kondeva-Burdina, M.; Karabeliov, V.; Shivachev, B.; Tchekalarova, J. Discovery of Novel Indole-Based Aroylhydrazones as Anticonvulsants: Pharmacophore-Based Design. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 90, 103028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Somappa, S.B.; Biradar, J.S.; Rajesab, P.; Rahber, S.; Sundar, M. A One-Pot Synthesis of Indole-Appended Heterocycles as Potent Anti-Inflammatory, Analgesic, and CNS Depressant Agents. Mon. Chem.-Chem. Mon. 2015, 146, 2067–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Radwan, M.A.; Ragab, E.A.; Sabry, N.M.; El-Shenawy, S.M. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of New 3-Substituted Indole Derivatives as Potential Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 3832–3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dadashpour, S.; Emami, S. Indole in the Target-Based Design of Anticancer Agents: A Versatile Scaffold with Diverse Mechanisms. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 150, 9–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wan, Y.; Li, Y.; Yan, C.; Yan, M.; Tang, Z. Indole: A Privileged Scaffold for the Design of Anti-Cancer Agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 183, 111691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Greenwell, M.; Rahman, P. Medicinal Plants: Their Use in Anticancer Treatment. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 4103–4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Asati, V.; Mahapatra, D.K.; Bharti, S.K. PI3K/Akt/MTOR and Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK Signaling Pathways Inhibitors as Anticancer Agents: Structural and Pharmacological Perspectives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 109, 314–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Manal, M.; Chandrasekar, M.J.N.; Priya, J.G.; Nanjan, M.J. Inhibitors of Histone Deacetylase as Antitumor Agents: A Critical Review. Bioorg. Chem. 2016, 67, 18–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Diao, P.C.; Jian, X.E.; Chen, P.; Huang, C.; Yin, J.; Huang, J.C.; Li, J.S.; Zhao, P.L. Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Indole-Based Oxalamide and Aminoacetamide Derivatives as Tubulin Polymerization Inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 126816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mirzaei, H.; Shokrzadeh, M.; Modanloo, M.; Ziar, A.; Riazi, G.H.; Emami, S. New Indole-Based Chalconoids as Tubulin-Targeting Antiproliferative Agents. Bioorg. Chem. 2017, 75, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hwang, D.-J.; Wang, J.; Li, W.; Miller, D.D. Structural Optimization of Indole Derivatives Acting at Colchicine Binding Site as Potential Anticancer Agents. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 993–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cong, H.; Zhao, X.; Castle, B.T.; Pomeroy, E.J.; Zhou, B.; Lee, J.; Wang, Y.; Bian, T.; Miao, Z.; Zhang, W.; et al. An Indole-Chalcone Inhibits Multidrug-Resistant Cancer Cell Growth by Targeting Microtubules. Mol. Pharm. 2018, 15, 3892–3900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dhiman, A.; Sharma, R.; Singh, R.K. Target-Based Anticancer Indole Derivatives and Insight into Structure-activity Relationship: A Mechanistic Review Update (2018–2021). Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2022, 12, 3006–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, Y.; Dong, W.; Guo, Q.; Li, X.; Huang, L. The Importance of Indole and Azaindole Scaffold in the Development of Antitumor Agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 203, 112506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sherer, C.; Snape, T.J. Heterocyclic Scaffolds as Promising Anticancer Agents against Tumours of the Central Nervous System: Exploring the Scope of Indole and Carbazole Derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 97, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Devi, N.; Kaur, K.; Biharee, A.; Jaitak, V. Recent Development in Indole Derivatives as Anticancer Agent: A Mechanistic Approach. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 1802–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Al-Wabli, R.I.; Almomen, A.A.; Almutairi, M.S.; Keeton, A.B.; Piazza, G.A.; Attia, M.I. New Isatin–Indole Conjugates: Synthesis, Characterization, and a Plausible Mechanism of Their in vitro Antiproliferative Activity. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2020, 14, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Eldehna, W.M.; Al-Wabli, R.I.; Almutairi, M.S.; Keeton, A.B.; Piazza, G.A.; Abdel-Aziz, H.A.; Attia, M.I. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Certain Hydrazonoindolin-2-One Derivatives as New Potent Anti-Proliferative Agents. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2018, 33, 867–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Valeur, E.; Bradley, M. Amide Bond Formation: Beyond the Myth of Coupling Reagents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 606–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 24 07862 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the target compounds 4a–q. Reagents and conditions: (i) N2H4·H2O, EtOH, reflux. (ii) EDCI, CH2Cl2, stirring for 24 h.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the target compounds 4a–q. Reagents and conditions: (i) N2H4·H2O, EtOH, reflux. (ii) EDCI, CH2Cl2, stirring for 24 h.
Ijms 24 07862 sch001
Ijms 24 07862 g001 550
Figure 1. The IC-50s of compounds 4a–q in MCF-7, HCT116, A595, and WI38 over 48 h compared to control (Staurosporine).
Figure 1. The IC-50s of compounds 4a–q in MCF-7, HCT116, A595, and WI38 over 48 h compared to control (Staurosporine).
Ijms 24 07862 g001
Ijms 24 07862 g002 550
Figure 2. Compounds 4e (A) and 4q (B) impair the viability of MCF-7, A549, HCT, and WI38 cells over the course of 48 h. Figures represent percent cell viability versus log drug concentration (µM).
Figure 2. Compounds 4e (A) and 4q (B) impair the viability of MCF-7, A549, HCT, and WI38 cells over the course of 48 h. Figures represent percent cell viability versus log drug concentration (µM).
Ijms 24 07862 g002
Ijms 24 07862 g003 550
Figure 3. Compound 4e boosts Annexin-V and PI cell populations in MCF-7 cells (middle) relative to control (right) after 48 h of treatment. The percentage of apoptosis was also quantified in the bar graph shown on the (left).
Figure 3. Compound 4e boosts Annexin-V and PI cell populations in MCF-7 cells (middle) relative to control (right) after 48 h of treatment. The percentage of apoptosis was also quantified in the bar graph shown on the (left).
Ijms 24 07862 g003
Ijms 24 07862 g004 550
Figure 4. Here, 4e induces cell cycle arrest at the S phase relative to control after 48 h of cell treatment.
Figure 4. Here, 4e induces cell cycle arrest at the S phase relative to control after 48 h of cell treatment.
Ijms 24 07862 g004
Table
Table 1. The IC-50s of compounds 4a–q in MCF-7, HCT116, A595, and WI38 over 48 h compared to control (Staurosporine).
Table 1. The IC-50s of compounds 4a–q in MCF-7, HCT116, A595, and WI38 over 48 h compared to control (Staurosporine).
SampleCytotoxicity
IC50 (uM)
CodeM.W (g/mol)MCF7HCT116A549WI38
4a29921.7 ± 1.0441.3 ± 1.985.9 ± 0.3266.2 ± 3.75
4b32911.5 ± 0.55190 ± 9.1249.2 ± 2.68163 ± 9.25
4c26562 ± 2.9732.5 ± 1.5625.3 ± 1.3850.4 ± 2.86
4d2953.23 ± 0.1666.2 ± 3.175.69 ± 0.3195.2 ± 5.39
4e4010.57 ± 0.031.95 ± 0.093.49 ± 0.1987.2 ± 4.94
4f43258.1 ± 2.789.79 ± 0.478.33 ± 0.4524.4 ± 1.38
4g2838.31 ± 0.412.3 ± 0.5917 ± 0.93117 ± 6.65
4h31313.1 ± 0.63207 ± 9.9423.9 ± 1.364.1 ± 3.63
4i38323.9 ± 1.1552.2 ± 2.511.6 ± 0.6325.3 ± 1.43
4j3643.27 ± 0.169.16 ± 0.446.78 ± 0.3797.9 ± 5.54
4k2909.21 ± 0.4439.1 ± 1.882.65 ± 0.1430.8 ± 1.74
4l32181.4 ± 3.95.02 ± 0.2426.6 ± 1.4518.5 ± 1.05
4m34362.9 ± 3.0117.5 ± 0.8412.9 ± 0.746.1 ± 2.61
4n375141 ± 6.7461 ± 2.9216.7 ± 0.91252 ± 14.3
4o3103.66 ± 0.182.41 ± 0.1222.3 ± 1.2186 ± 4.87
4p3417.01 ± 0.3419.4 ± 0.933.02 ± 0.1617.4 ± 0.99
4q3101.01 ± 0.056.45 ± 0.312.4 ± 0.1356.2 ± 3.18
Staurosporine466.511.1 ± 0.537.02 ± 0.348.42 ± 0.4628.5 ± 1.62
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Wabli, R.I.; Issa, I.S.; Al-mutairi, M.S.; Almomen, A.A.; Attia, M.I. A Facile Synthesis and Molecular Characterization of Certain New Anti-Proliferative Indole-Based Chemical Entities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097862

AMA Style

Al-Wabli RI, Issa IS, Al-mutairi MS, Almomen AA, Attia MI. A Facile Synthesis and Molecular Characterization of Certain New Anti-Proliferative Indole-Based Chemical Entities. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(9):7862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097862

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Wabli, Reem I., Iman S. Issa, Maha S. Al-mutairi, Aliyah A. Almomen, and Mohamed I. Attia. 2023. "A Facile Synthesis and Molecular Characterization of Certain New Anti-Proliferative Indole-Based Chemical Entities" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 9: 7862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097862

APA Style

Al-Wabli, R. I., Issa, I. S., Al-mutairi, M. S., Almomen, A. A., & Attia, M. I. (2023). A Facile Synthesis and Molecular Characterization of Certain New Anti-Proliferative Indole-Based Chemical Entities. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(9), 7862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097862

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop