Next Article in Journal
Wheat ABA Receptor TaPYL5 Constitutes a Signaling Module with Its Downstream Partners TaPP2C53/TaSnRK2.1/TaABI1 to Modulate Plant Drought Response
Next Article in Special Issue
CRISPR-Based Genome Editing Tools: An Accelerator in Crop Breeding for a Changing Future
Previous Article in Journal
In Vivo Efficacy and Toxicity of an Antimicrobial Peptide in a Model of Endotoxin-Induced Pulmonary Inflammation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plastid Phylogenomic Analyses Reveal a Cryptic Species of Ligusticopsis (Apiaceae, Angiosperms)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Combined Metabolome and Transcriptome Analysis Highlights the Host’s Influence on Cistanche deserticola Metabolite Accumulation

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 7968; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097968
by Ru Feng, Hongshuang Wei *, Rong Xu *, Sai Liu, Jianhe Wei, Kun Guo, Haili Qiao and Changqing Xu
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 7968; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097968
Submission received: 1 March 2023 / Revised: 17 April 2023 / Accepted: 22 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Genomics and Genome Editing 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Paper is related to the relationship of metabolites production and gene expression in Cistanche

The paper shows the transcriptome and metabolome and trying to do a correlationship between them

The study seems to be complete and show interesting conclusions

Author Response

Thank you for your suggestions.

We added conclusions in the end of the manuscript.

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors,

Your manuscript entitled "Combined analysis of metabolome and transcriptome highlighted the host’s influence on Cistanche deserticola metabolites accumulation" is very interesting indeed. However, it suffers from one major problem - your English language must be improved significantly. Otherwise, it is really difficult to understand. Therefore, I must recommend a major revision and would like to review again a revised version with appropriately polished English both in terms of grammar and style.

A minor remark concerns the host specificity of Cistanche deserticola. I want to know whether this parasitic plant is strictly specific to the host Haloxylon ammodendron or can also infest other potential host species. This is important to be addressed in the Introduction section.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors,

Your manuscript was significantly improved. However, I will request some further changes, more specifically:

- Table 1 and the respective information in the text should be moved to Results section, it is not appropriate for the Introduction. For example the paragraph, starting on line 71 should start with: "In this study,  C. deserticola fleshy stems, their hosts’ roots and healthy H. ammodendron roots were compared by metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses...." Then move your Table with some more information in either Results or Material section.

- overall, your Introduction section is kind of short and disproportionate compared to the rest of the manuscript. I will appreciate a paragraph, or two, for example containing information on how host plant species affect specialized metabolites accumulation in other parasitic plants. 

- the start of your Discussion: "Orobanchaceae root-parasitic plants are crafty thieves. They sense signals from the hosts, germinate, intrude into the hosts’ roots, and develop vascular connections. Though all of these efforts their only goal is to steal life-essential materials which other plants spend their whole lives collecting. Such an unequal trade causes significant damages to the hosts." must be re-written. This is not literature or poetry, this is a scientific paper and you must adhere to certain standards.

- you are not consistent in citations: "the glycosylation of tyrosol[36]" is wrong, it must be "the glycosylation of tyrosol [36]", e.g., add intervals before the citation wherever needed.

- some minor stylistic and grammar polishing is required. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop