Next Article in Journal
Psycho-Cognitive Profile and NGF and BDNF Levels in Tears and Serum: A Pilot Study in Patients with Graves’ Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Salt Stress—Regulation of Root Water Uptake in a Whole-Plant and Diurnal Context
Previous Article in Special Issue
TMEM244 Is a Long Non-Coding RNA Necessary for CTCL Cell Growth
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Differential Response of Mycosis Fungoides Cells to Vorinostat

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 8075; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098075
by Zachary A. Bordeaux 1,2,†, Sriya V. Reddy 1,2,†, Kevin Lee 1, Weiying Lu 1, Justin Choi 1,2, Meghan Miller 2, Callie Roberts 2, Anthony Pollizzi 2, Shawn G. Kwatra 1,3,* and Madan M. Kwatra 2,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 8075; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098075
Submission received: 1 April 2023 / Revised: 23 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 29 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Pathogenesis of T Cell Lymphomas)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an interesting and well written manuscript.  The study is well structured and conclusions are consistent with the experimental data.  The lack of in vivo studies is the main limitation and moreover the translational significance of the study should be better explained in particular with regard to the low efficace of the drug in the treatment of mycosis fungoides.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I have no major comments for the authors. The study is designed and presented accurately. The authors also identify the limitations of the study. My major concern is relevance of the study. Vorinostat is currently used in treatment process for CTCL patients. In addition, effects of Vorinostat in CTCL cell lines has previously been studied not with RNA sequencing but with other methods. In my understanding, this study does not contribute any additional relevant information that has previously not been discovered. I would advice the authors to cite those previous studies and compare current data to signify the overall relevance of their discovery. 

None.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop