Next Article in Journal
The Bmtret1 Gene Family and Its Potential Role in Response to BmNPV Stress in Bombyx mori
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Mycolic Acids on Host Immunity and Lipid Metabolism
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances of 68Ga-Labeled PET Radiotracers with Nitroimidazole in the Diagnosis of Hypoxia Tumors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

PET Molecular Imaging: Old Habits Do Not Die, They Only Evolve into New Applications

by
Ferdinando F. Calabria
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, Mariano Santo Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(1), 403; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010403
Submission received: 11 December 2023 / Accepted: 20 December 2023 / Published: 28 December 2023
The first studies on human applications of radioisotopes for the in vivo targeting of pathophysiological processes began in the late 1930s in Western Europe and the USA with 99mTc [1,2], which is currently the most widely used tracer in traditional nuclear medicine. A further γ-emitting agent, 131I, enabled imaging and treatment of the thyroid tissue [3]; although this is not strictly speaking a radiopharmaceutical, its affinity for nonradioactive iodine has enabled the visualization and treatment of hyperthyroidism since the early days of nuclear medicine imaging. It is highly and selectively absorbed in the target tissue [3].
Undoubtedly, the advent of theranostic in the last decade has its roots in the preliminary, pioneering noninvasive treatment of hyperthyroidism with 131I. A huge volume of data reports that the synergy between diagnostic tracers in nuclear medicine and their therapeutic counterpart is enlarging the application of theranostic in prostate cancer cases with radiolabeled Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) [4] and neuroendocrine tumors with 68Ga/177Lu-labeled somatostatin analogs [5]. Moreover, upcoming studies are evaluating the role of 177Lu in the treatment of severe meningiomatosis [6].
This rapid process of innovation would not have taken place without the development and commercial availability of hybrid scanners such as Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) [7] and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) [8], combined with Computed Tomography (CT). In fact, both SPECT/CT and PET/CT improve the localization of functional data to accurately identify and monitor the diseases.
Its increased power resolution has made it possible to consider PET imaging among the main diagnostic procedures in oncology, cardiology, and neurology, thanks to the advantages of 18F-FDG [9] as an analog of glucose. However, 18F-FDG presents limits in evaluating the cortex, the myocardium, and malignant tumors, with a low rate of glucose metabolism. Several tracers have earned a special place in the field of PET molecular imaging. The noteworthy experience of nuclear physicians in imaging neuroendocrine tumors with somatostatin analogs and SPECT has been copied and improved by PET [10]. Additionally,11C/18F radiolabeled choline has gained a role in the management of prostate cancer patients [11] and 87Rb has been used for myocardial perfusion imaging [12], while amino acid and amyloid tracers currently enable the study of brain tumors [13] and dementia [14], respectively.
Interestingly, the identification of diagnostic pitfalls linked to the uptake of radiolabeled choline in several benign tumors has enlarged its field of application to the diagnosis of parathyroid adenoma [15]. This is an intuitive example of the vitality of nuclear medicine, where a prostate cancer imaging agent can play a further diagnostic role due to the overexpression of phosphatidylcholine turnover in parathyroid adenoma.
At the same time, a performing radiopharmaceutical, 18F/68Ga-PSMA, is quickly becoming the most important agent for the imaging of prostate cancer and is considered as a preliminary step prior to submitting metastatic patients to radionuclide therapy with 177Lu [16].
Nevertheless, beyond the incidental discovery of new diagnostic applications, the development of novel PET radiopharmaceuticals is a complex, scheduled process, involving a number scientists worldwide. Radiopharmacists, physicists, biologists, and chemical engineers are some professional groups which are actively involved in this continuous growth and innovation process, alongside nuclear medicine researchers.
The intention of this Special Issue is to expand the knowledge regarding PET radiopharmaceuticals that are currently under study or to describe new applications of tracers already in use. The expected benefit is to share current topics of interest in order to connect molecular and preclinical studies with clinical works.
As a matter of fact, the interest in the PET imaging with 125I and 131I is still high; their optimal half-life enables their availability in PET centers not provided by a cyclotron, while novel synthesis strategies enable high lipophilic iodine-containing compounds, which may improve their pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties. Their selective accumulation in the target tissues (i.e., thyroid and stomach) enables one to conceive a feasible role of therapy with radioiodine-containing drugs in several diseases [17].
The potential impact of consolidated tracers in the management of cancer patients should not be underestimated; interesting data are emerging from the application of radiomics to PET imaging, with 18F-fluoroethylcholine in prostate cancer imaging [18] or 18F-DOPA in movement disorders [19]. The other contributions of this Special Issue offer direct insight into a wide range of new molecular pathways—such as hypoxia imaging and the 68Ga-Fibroblast-Activation Protein Inhibitor—novel hybrid chelators, and new synthesis methods through an experimental approach; however, there is still a lack of knowledge on the potential benefits and pitfalls emerging from routine use of the proposed tracers, which should be assessed in different clinical settings.
The availability of the latest hybrid imaging systems, such as PET/CT and PET/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), is probably the primary research direction for recognizing patterns of physiological bio-distribution and the investigation of their diagnostic accuracy, regarding the creation of a wide field of applications concerning radiopharmaceutical preparations for PET imaging and therapy, as well as multimodal imaging [8,20].
In conclusion, it is likely that soon the body of knowledge surrounding these topics will increase, eventually defining the role of theranostic in the context of personalized medicine. This needs to be achieved through a bridge between all professionals involved.
It is unlikely that new tracers will replace 18F-FDG. Conversely, it is quite exciting to imagine that these tracers could play a significant role in the future of nuclear medicine, including earlier theranostic applications. Among tested tracers, the most effective theranostic agent for personalized imaging and treatment of diseases will be found.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Segrè, E.; Seaborg, G.T. Nuclear isomerism in element. Phys. Rev. 1938, 43, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fermi, E. Reactions produced by neutrons in heavy elements. Science 1940, 92, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sawin, C.T.; Becker, D.V. Radioiodine and the treatment of hyperthyroidism: The early history. Thyroid 1997, 7, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sartor, O.; de Bono, J.; Chi, K.N.; Fizazi, K.; Herrmann, K.; Rahbar, K.; Tagawa, S.T.; Nordquist, L.T.; Vaishampayan, N.; El-Haddad, G.; et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 1091–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jia, A.Y.; Kashani, R.; Zaorsky, N.G.; Spratt, D.E.; Kiess, A.P.; Michalski, J.M.; Zoberi, J.E.; Kim, H.; Baumann, B.C. Lutetium-177 DOTATATE: A Practical Review. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 2022, 12, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wrange, E.K.M.; Harders, S.M.W. A rare case of metastatic atypical meningioma that highlights the shortcomings of treatment options at present. Acta Radiol. Open 2022, 11, 20584601221109919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Van den Wyngaert, T.; Elvas, F.; De Schepper, S.; Kennedy, J.A.; Israel, O. SPECT/CT: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants, It Is Time to Reach for the Sky! J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61, 1284–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Schillaci, O.; Urbano, N. Digital PET/CT: A new intriguing chance for clinical nuclear medicine and personalized molecular imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 1222–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Singnurkar, A.; Poon, R.; Metser, U. Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging in oncology: A systematic review. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2017, 31, 366–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Spanu, A.; Schillaci, O.; Piras, B.; Calvisi, D.F.; Falchi, A.; Danieli, R.; Nuvoli, S.; Dore, F.; Madeddu, G. Non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors: A 111In-Pentetreotide SPECT/CT diagnostic study. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2017, 7, 81–194. [Google Scholar]
  11. Brogsitter, C.; Zöphel, K.; Kotzerke, J. 18F-Choline, 11C-choline and 11C-acetate PET/CT: Comparative analysis for imaging prostate cancer patients. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2013, 40, S18–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Højstrup, S.; Hansen, K.W.; Talleruphuus, U.; Marner, L.; Bjerking, L.; Jakobsen, L.; Christiansen, E.H.; Bouchelouche, K.; Wiinberg, N.; Guldbrandsen, K.; et al. Myocardial Flow Reserve, an Independent Prognostic Marker of All-Cause Mortality Assessed by 82Rb PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Danish Multicenter Study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2023, 16, e015184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Galldiks, N.; Lohmann, P.; Fink, G.R.; Langen, K.J. Amino Acid PET in Neurooncology. J. Nucl. Med. 2023, 64, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Burkett, B.J.; Babcock, J.C.; Lowe, V.J.; Graff-Radford, J.; Subramaniam, R.M.; Johnson, D.R. PET Imaging of Dementia: Update 2022. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2022, 47, 763–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Petranović Ovčariček, P.; Giovanella, L.; Carrió Gasset, I.; Hindié, E.; Huellner, M.W.; Luster, M.; Piccardo, A.; Weber, T.; Talbot, J.N.; Verburg, F.A. The EANM practice guidelines for parathyroid imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2021, 48, 2801–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, M.H.; Lee, K.; Oh, K.; Kim, C.H.; Kil, H.S.; Lee, Y.J.; Lee, K.C.; Chi, D.Y. Evaluation of PSMA target diagnostic PET tracers for therapeutic monitoring of [177Lu]ludotadipep of prostate cancer: Screening of PSMA target efficiency and biodistribution using [18F]DCFPyL and [68Ga]PSMA-11. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2023, 651, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Petrov, S.A.; Yusubov, M.S.; Beloglazkina, E.K.; Nenajdenko, V.J. Synthesis of Radioiodinated Compounds. Classical Approaches and Achievements of Recent Years. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pizzuto, D.A.; Triumbari, E.K.A.; Morland, D.; Boldrini, L.; Gatta, R.; Treglia, G.; Bientinesi, R.; De Summa, M.; De Risi, M.; Caldarella, C.; et al. 18F-Fluoroethylcholine PET/CT Radiomic Analysis for Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients: A Monocentric Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Krauthammer, S.H.; Cohen, D.; Even-Sapir, E.; Lerman, H. Beyond Visual Assessment of Basal Ganglia Uptake: Can Automated Method and Pineal Body Uptake Assessment Improve Identification of Nigrostriatal Dysfunction on 18F-DOPA PET/CT? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Filippi, L.; Urbano, N.; Schillaci, O. Total-body PET/CT: How will it change theranostics in oncology? Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2023, 20, 999–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Calabria, F.F. PET Molecular Imaging: Old Habits Do Not Die, They Only Evolve into New Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 403. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010403

AMA Style

Calabria FF. PET Molecular Imaging: Old Habits Do Not Die, They Only Evolve into New Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(1):403. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010403

Chicago/Turabian Style

Calabria, Ferdinando F. 2024. "PET Molecular Imaging: Old Habits Do Not Die, They Only Evolve into New Applications" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 1: 403. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010403

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop