Next Article in Journal
Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Their Niche in Bone Marrow
Previous Article in Journal
STAT5 Is Necessary for the Metabolic Switch Induced by IL-2 in Cervical Cancer Cell Line SiHa
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms25136838
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Synaptic Mechanisms of Ethanol Tolerance and Neuroplasticity: Insights from Invertebrate Models

by
Aakriti Bhandari
1,2,3,
Alexandra Seguin
2 and
Adrian Rothenfluh
1,2,3,4,5,*
1
Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
2
Molecular Medicine Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
3
Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
4
Department of Neurobiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
5
Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(13), 6838; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136838
Submission received: 6 May 2024 / Revised: 9 June 2024 / Accepted: 10 June 2024 / Published: 21 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Neurobiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Alcohol tolerance is a neuroadaptive response that leads to a reduction in the effects of alcohol caused by previous exposure. Tolerance plays a critical role in the development of alcohol use disorder (AUD) because it leads to the escalation of drinking and dependence. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying alcohol tolerance is therefore important for the development of effective therapeutics and for understanding addiction in general. This review explores the molecular basis of alcohol tolerance in invertebrate models, Drosophila and C. elegans, focusing on synaptic transmission. Both organisms exhibit biphasic responses to ethanol and develop tolerance similar to that of mammals. Furthermore, the availability of several genetic tools makes them a great candidate to study the molecular basis of ethanol response. Studies in invertebrate models show that tolerance involves conserved changes in the neurotransmitter systems, ion channels, and synaptic proteins. These neuroadaptive changes lead to a change in neuronal excitability, most likely to compensate for the enhanced inhibition by ethanol.

1. Introduction

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a complex disorder impacting millions of individuals worldwide. It includes the compulsive and excessive consumption of alcohol despite its detrimental effects on physical and mental well-being. In the 2021 national drug and health surveys, approximately 29.5 million individuals aged 12 and older in the United States alone reported having experienced AUD in the previous year [1]. The global pandemic of COVID-19 has increased the prevalence of this disorder because increased stress, social isolation, and economic hardship contribute to the development and escalation of AUD [2]. The consequences of AUD extend across a spectrum of physical, psychological, and social issues, including liver disease [3,4,5,6], cardiovascular problems [5,7,8,9], strained interpersonal relationships, and cognitive impairments [10,11,12]. Therefore, gaining a comprehensive understanding of its underlying mechanisms is crucial to identifying not only at-risk individuals but also developing more efficient therapeutics.
The development and progression of AUD are significantly influenced by tolerance, a neuroadaptive mechanism that reduces an individual’s sensitivity to the effects of alcohol after repeated exposure. As individuals build tolerance to alcohol, they tend to consume larger amounts to achieve the desired level of intoxication (or the same level of drunkenness they previously experienced with lower amounts). This will result in excessive drinking, and they will experience withdrawal symptoms upon abstinence, which will encourage them to drink again and develop dependence. Tolerance is a form of homeostatic plasticity, which is the brain’s ability to maintain equilibrium upon alcohol exposure. Consumption of large doses of alcohol leads to central nervous system (CNS) depression, including increased activity of the inhibitory system, such as GABAergic neurons. This can trigger adaptive changes in the brain to restore overall brain activity levels. These adaptations are behaviorally reflected in the development of tolerance and dependence, making them essential components in the study of AUD [13,14,15].
To understand the mechanism of AUD and the development of tolerance, invertebrate model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans have emerged as valuable tools. Their genetic tractability and conserved neural signaling pathways make them useful in investigating ethanol-induced tolerance and neuroplasticity at the molecular level. This literature review explores the insights gained from studying these phenomena in invertebrates, elucidating the intricate details of the molecular alterations caused by alcohol exposure/consumption, focusing on neurotransmission and synaptic mechanisms.

2. AUD and Neuroplasticity

An essential aspect of understanding the progressive nature of AUD is how alcohol exposure causes alterations in brain structure and function, also referred to as neuroplasticity. Alcohol, a central nervous system depressant, has the ability to disrupt neuronal homeostasis by altering the balance between excitatory and inhibitory signaling within the brain [13,14]. These disruptions in neuronal balance are critical components of the development of both tolerance and dependence. Tolerance of prolonged alcohol use increases neuronal excitability as a compensatory mechanism to alcohol-induced CNS depression and is aimed at restoring equilibrium within the brain. This imbalance becomes particularly evident in conditions such as delirium tremens experienced during withdrawal. Individuals undergoing the withdrawal process experience severe discomfort, often accompanied by tremors and seizures, upon the discontinuation of alcohol consumption, all of which can be attributed to hyperexcitability of the CNS [16]. The heightened excitability of neurons reflects the brain’s adaptive process of acquired tolerance to counterbalance the CNS-depressant effects of alcohol (Figure 1).

3. Alcohol Tolerance—A Critical Endophenotype of AUD

While neuroplasticity is central to the development of AUD, the disorder’s complexity arises from its multifaceted etiology, influenced by a number of genetic, psychosocial, and environmental factors [17,18,19,20,21]. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V), a diagnosis of AUD requires the presence of at least two of the 11 potential symptoms within a 12-month period. This can further be classified based on the severity depending on the number of symptoms presented by the patient; the presence of 2–3 and 4–5 criteria is diagnosed as a mild and moderate symptom, respectively, whereas the presence of 6 or more criteria can be presented as a severe form of AUD [22]. Because of its diverse clinical manifestation, it is important to explore the addiction’s endophenotypes, which are smaller, measurable components of a broader phenotype that enable us to bridge the gap between complex traits and the underlying genetic and biological mechanisms associated with AUD [23,24].
One of the risk factors for AUD is the initial sensitivity. Sensitivity refers to an individual’s naive response to the effect of alcohol. Some individuals are more sensitive and experience a heightened response at a lower dose. Others experience a reduced response to alcohol’s effects, requiring a larger dose to feel intoxicated, which can lead to escalated drinking and the development of tolerance. Tolerance is one of the major endophenotypes of AUD, which is defined as a reduced sensitivity to the intoxicating effect of alcohol following prior exposure, ultimately leading to AUD [25]. Tolerance is a form of neuroadaptive response in which an organism repeatedly exposed to alcohol develops resistance to its intoxicating effects [15]. Tolerance may result from more efficient removal of alcohol from the body, referred to as metabolic tolerance, or can also result from neural adaptations, referred to as functional tolerance. Functional tolerance can develop shortly after a single exposure to alcohol, known as acute tolerance, which can manifest within minutes of exposure. Alternatively, it may develop gradually over extended periods of time due to repeated or prolonged alcohol exposure, referred to as rapid or chronic tolerance. In humans, chronic alcohol use leads to tolerance, which can develop into both the pleasurable and aversive effects of ethanol [26]. Tolerance develops into the intoxicating effects of alcohol, such as motor imbalance or even becoming sedated. It also develops into the pleasurable effects of alcohol, such as feeling disinhibited and elated. Therefore, to replicate the feeling of elation, individuals need to drink more as tolerance develops to reach the same behavioral point of elation. This drives escalation, with dependence as a severe manifestation, where the Excitation/Inhibition (E/I) balance is so skewed that alcohol is needed on board [27]. The blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is a direct measure of the amount of alcohol present in a person’s bloodstream and can be used to assess both sensitivity and acute tolerance [28]. Individuals with higher sensitivity will rapidly show behavioral responses to the intoxicating effect as the BAC becomes higher, whereas individuals who develop acute tolerance will experience lower effects as they drink more, and BAC levels stay high [29]. Unlike acute tolerance, there is no efficient and direct way to measure rapid tolerance in humans (such as measuring naïve response to alcohol, followed by a second exposure to alcohol once alcohol from the first exposure has been metabolized). This review will focus on functional tolerance (pharmacodynamic tolerance) referred to as alcohol-induced alcohol tolerance.

4. Invertebrates as A Model System to Study AUD

Given the limited capacity for gaining mechanistic insights from human studies, the use of model organisms is essential in comprehending AUD and related behaviors. Invertebrates such as Caenorhabditis elegans (nematodes) and Drosophila melanogaster (fruit/vinegar flies) are valuable research models for investigating the roles of individual genes and proteins in neurotransmission, particularly those associated with alcohol-induced behaviors and neuroplasticity [30,31]. Other invertebrate models such as Schmidtea mediterranea, Giradia tigrina (planaria), Apis mellifera (honey bees), and Orconectes rusticus (crayfish) have also been used as promising models to study alcohol-related behaviors; however, they have been studied more sporadically and with lesser molecular and mechanistic amenability [32,33,34]. Therefore, this review will focus on the studies in Drosophila and C. elegans.
C. elegans serves as an excellent model organism due to its conserved neurobiological systems as well as the availability of numerous molecular and genetic tools, including a fully sequenced genome, thousands of genetic mutants, and the ability to manipulate gene expression through transgenic and RNAi techniques [35,36]. They also have a short life cycle and fast generation time (~3 days) allowing research at economy of time and scale compared to higher-level organisms. Microarray analysis has identified 230 genes to be affected by ethanol in C. elegans [37]. Furthermore, ~50 genes have been shown to influence alcohol-related behavioral responses in worms, and some of those genes orthologs have been implicated in alcohol use disorder in humans [38].
C. elegans exhibit a range of dose-dependent behavioral responses to ethanol exposure that are similar to those observed in mammals. At a lower concentration, ethanol can lead to an increase in locomotor activity (hyperactivity) while a higher concentration of ethanol can lead to progressive changes in locomotion, ranging from incoordination to immobilization. These behavioral effects are reversible upon the removal of ethanol [39]. Furthermore, C. elegans develops acute tolerance to the depressive (or sedative) effects of ethanol (Figure 2A). This is demonstrated by their increased locomotor activity within 30 min of exposure despite the continuous presence of ethanol [40]. This indicates that they need more ethanol to reach the initial level of behavioral impairment after exposure, as their neurons have adapted to compensate for the effects of the alcohol. These effects occur when internal ethanol concentration reaches levels comparable to human intoxication [41,42]. The internal ethanol concentration of worms exposed to 400–500 mM ethanol for 22 min is comparable to 0.1% BAC [42]. Thus, C. elegans exhibits biphasic responses to ethanol, like mammals, which makes it a successful model for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying ethanol actions. These even include a model for experience-dependent preference, where pre-exposure to ethanol (for 4 h) induces adaptive changes that cause ethanol preference with a shift in behavior from avoidance to attraction [43].
Similarly, Drosophila exhibits a biphasic behavioral response to ethanol vapor, including an initial increase in locomotion followed by incoordination, loss of postural control, and eventual sedation and immobility similar to mammals. The concentrations of ethanol that stimulate locomotion in flies are similar to the levels in rodents and humans that induce disinhibition and feelings of euphoria. Similarly, the ethanol dose that causes incoordination and sedation in flies is also comparable to the effects observed in mammals [44]. The internal ethanol concentration at times of hyperactivity is about 20 mM (corresponding to a 0.09% BAC) and 45 mM at the time of sedation (corresponding to 0.21% BAC) [44]. Each of the behavioral responses can be determined using various assays, such as locomotor tracking and loss of righting test. These assays have evolved from using straightforward line-crossing assays to measure the fly’s speed for hyperactivity to video-tracking different behaviors [44,45,46], as well as using two-choice consumption assays to determine the flies’ experience-dependent alcohol consumption preference [47,48,49]. Meanwhile, the inebriometer provides a means to gauge both sedation levels and the impact on postural control. This is achieved by measuring the duration it takes for ethanol-exposed flies to lose postural control and elute out of a column filled with ethanol vapor [50]. Researchers also showed that flies develop rapid tolerance, indicating that they require a longer time to sedate upon a second exposure once all the ethanol from the initial exposure has completely metabolized (Figure 2B). Rapid tolerance can manifest in as little as two hours and can persist for at least 24 h and is a functional adaptation, which is not caused by altered ethanol metabolism [51,52]. Furthermore, upon chronic exposure, flies become dependent on ethanol and experience withdrawal symptoms upon removal of ethanol [53]. Thus, flies have been shown to develop tolerance, experience withdrawal, and show a preference for ethanol (they learn to like alcohol), making them another excellent model to study alcohol and associated behaviors.
Additionally, Drosophila has a short generation time (~2 weeks), a fully sequenced genome, a mapped central brain connectome, and molecular conservation. There are extensive genetic tools, such as Gal4/UAS transgene systems, that allow for a targeted gene expression to study gene function and behaviors in Drosophila [54]. This is a binary system consisting of Gal4, a yeast transcription factor that can be expressed in specific patterns, and UAS, an upstream activating system, a DNA sequence that contains the binding site for Gal4. When tissue-specific Gal4 binds to UAS, it promotes the transcription of genes downstream of UAS, allowing expression in a specific pattern (as driven by the Gal4). Other complementary binary systems, such as LexA/LexAop and QF/QUAS derived from bacteria and Neurospora crassa, respectively, have been used extensively for in vivo manipulations [54]. Similarly, the FLP/FRT system, derived from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, can be used for site-specific recombination and genetic manipulation [55]. In addition, the split Gal4 system, in which Gal4 is split into two fragments, a DNA binding domain (DBD) and the transcription activation domain (AD), enables intersectional expression patterns by producing a functional Gal4 protein only in cells expressing both AD and DBD [56,57]. Using this system, we can drive tissue-specific expressions of RNAi and CRISPR/Cas9 systems for conditional knockout and mutagenesis, respectively [58,59]. Using these available tools, researchers can activate, silence, or ablate specific targets (neurons/genes) to understand their role in mediating specific behaviors [60]. Furthermore, the use of Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) allows for tracing cell lineages and clonal analysis and can be used for understanding the development of the nervous system, as well as mapping neural circuits [54]. In addition, unbiased screens can also be used to identify different genes and pathways impacting alcohol phenotype [61,62]. Furthermore, the neurotransmitter systems in flies are evolutionarily conserved and serve analogous functions to those in mammals, making Drosophila a relevant model for studying these systems [63].
Thus, both Drosophila and C. elegans are useful and exhibit numerous alcohol-related phenotypes and behaviors similar to mammals. These alcohol-related behaviors/responses are also induced by similar ethanol doses/concentrations, proving that studying these models is relevant and useful. In addition, there is a high genetic conservation between invertebrates and mammals. Approximately 75% of human disease-associated genes have a fly ortholog [64]. Researchers have also shown a high level of homology (~83%) between C. elegans and human proteins [65]. Moreover, many genes implicated in AUD are also conserved and have been shown to have ethanol phenotype in both C. elegans and D. melanogaster [66]. But these invertebrate models have certain limitations: their nervous systems are not as complex as mammals. The anatomy and the neural circuitry of invertebrates and vertebrates are fundamentally different since the mammalian nervous system has more than 1,000,000 neurons, potentially reducing the translational relevance in modeling neuropsychiatric disorders [33]. In addition, invertebrates do not display the full range of behavioral diversity observed in mammals. Addictive behaviors, including the measurement of tolerance in invertebrate models, are performed via changes in locomotor activity on exposure. The behavioral repertoire in mammalian models is more complex, along with motor incoordination in response to intoxication, and various neurophysiological and imaging techniques have been employed to understand addiction [67,68]. However, the limitations shown by invertebrate models are balanced by the economy of scale and time since we can test many genes and their impact in a time span that would not be feasible in vertebrate systems.

5. Molecular Pathways Involved in Functional Tolerance Relating to Plasticity

5.1. Neurotransmitters and Peptides

5.1.1. Octopamine

Octopamine is a biogenic monoamine that functions as a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator in invertebrates, including Drosophila and C. elegans. It is the invertebrate analog of norepinephrine, which signals via a G-protein coupled receptor to modulate numerous physiological and behavioral processes in Drosophila, including mating and courtship behavior, rhythmic behavior, and locomotion [69]. Octopaminergic signaling has been shown to play a significant role in the modulation of different ethanol responses in Drosophila such that the activation of octopaminergic signaling has been shown to increase attraction to ethanol odor [70] and the activation of a subset of octopaminergic neurons is sufficient to induce olfactory ethanol preference [71]. Scholz and colleagues show that flies that are incapable of synthesizing octopamine due to the lack of tyramine β-hydroxylase, an enzyme necessary for the synthesis of octopamine, show decreased tolerance to the sedative effect of ethanol [52]. The pharmacological depletion of norepinephrine in the brain prior to chronic ethanol exposure in mice prevented the development of tolerance to ethanol, highlighting the importance of an intact noradrenergic system for the development of tolerance in mammals [72]. The exact mechanism through which octopamine (or norepinephrine) influences ethanol response is not understood well, but it could involve interaction with other neurotransmitter systems. As a neuromodulator, octopamine may enhance or reduce neuronal excitability depending on the circuitry and neuronal population. This modulation can shift the overall balance of excitation and inhibition in a neural network, ultimately leading to changes in behavior.

5.1.2. NPR-1

The neuropeptide receptor-1 (NPR-1) in C. elegans is a G-protein coupled receptor that plays a role in modulating various behaviors like locomotion, feeding, mating, and worms’ responses to different sensory and environmental cues. This neuropeptide receptor is known to be a part of a complex circuitry that integrates various signals (like food, oxygen, and pathogens) to coordinate behavioral outputs (like aggregation, locomotion, pathogen avoidance, and sleep) in C. elegans [73,74]. Npr-1 has been found to negatively regulate the development of acute tolerance to ethanol [40]. The Drosophila analog of NPR-1, neuropeptide F (NPF), and its receptor have also been found to modulate alcohol sensitivity. The overexpression of NPF causes sensitivity to ethanol, whereas reduced NPF expression has been linked to increased ethanol consumption, preference, and resistance to ethanol sedation in flies [75,76,77]. In mammals, the alteration of NPY signaling (mammalian ortholog) has been associated with changes in alcohol consumption, and abnormal or low NPY activity promotes increased drinking [78]. Although there is no evidence of the role of NPY signaling in alcohol-induced tolerance in flies and mammals, research shows that NPY signaling decreases baseline GABAergic transmission and reverses the alcohol-induced enhancement of inhibitory transmission in the central amygdala [79]. This highlights the importance of this neuropeptide signaling in alcohol-induced behaviors, as well as in maintaining the balance of excitatory and inhibitory signaling in the CNS. NPY signaling-modulated change in GABAergic transmission could be important in understanding the neuroadaptive changes leading to tolerance.

5.1.3. GABA

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in the CNS and is essential for maintaining the firing rate of a neuron through its action on ionotropic or metabotropic receptors. Large-dose ethanol exposure increases GABA signaling in the brain, leading to enhanced GABAergic inhibitory transmission. This increase in GABA signaling is known to contribute to the sedative effects of ethanol [80,81]. Drosophila ionotropic GABAA receptor, with resistance to dieldrin (RDL), contributes to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation, and the metabotropic GABAB receptor has been shown to influence alcohol sensitivity and tolerance [82,83,84,85]. Dzitoyeva and colleagues showed that the administration of GABAB agonist prior to ethanol exposure prevented the development of rapid ethanol tolerance and decreased ethanol sensitivity, and GABAB antagonist increased resistance to the motor-impairing effect of alcohol in flies. Studies in C. elegans revealed the downregulation of genes associated with the GABA signaling pathway, including genes that encode glutamate decarboxylate (unc-25), GABA transporter (unc-47), and GABA receptor (unc-49), in response to ethanol [86]. Several studies have demonstrated that positive allosteric modulators of GABAB, as well as the GABAB agonist baclofen, are effective in reducing alcohol-seeking and drinking behavior, and they have been used to treat withdrawal symptoms in mammals, including humans [87,88,89]. Baclofen can inhibit the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol in mice, while GABAB antagonists can promote the development of tolerance in a dose-dependent manner [90]. This suggests that GABAB signaling plays a significant role in the neuroadaptations that lead to the development of tolerance. One of the possible mechanisms for this adaptation could be a reduction in the number of receptors to compensate for the ethanol-induced activation of GABA receptors, which results in an increase in inhibition in the CNS, leading to ethanol-induced sedation.

5.2. Ion Channels

5.2.1. NMDAR

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are ionotropic receptors activated by the neurotransmitter glutamate and are essential for excitatory signaling in the CNS. NMDAR is one of the major targets of ethanol, as acute exposure to ethanol is known to inhibit NMDA-activated current while chronic exposure is known to increase the activity of NMDAR [91,92,93]. In Drosophila, a point mutation in NMDA receptor subunit 1 (NMDAR1) leads to a change in sensitivity to the effect of ethanol. F654A mutant flies exhibited increased sensitivity, while K558Q mutants showed decreased sensitivity to ethanol sedation without affecting tolerance [94]. Loss of function (LOF) mutant in Drosophila Nmdar1 showed a decrease in the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol sedation [95]. Several studies have shown NMDAR activity to be associated with the development of acute tolerance to ethanol-induced inhibition in the mammalian brain [96,97]. The administration of NMDAR antagonists has been shown to block the development of rapid tolerance in mammals, highlighting the importance of functional NMDAR in adaptive response to alcohol [98,99,100]. Chronic alcohol exposure has been shown to increase the expression of the NMDAR subunits (NR1 and NR2) [93]. The increase in the number of receptors following ethanol exposure could reflect the brain’s adaptive process of acquired tolerance in order to compensate for the depressant effects of ethanol. This may be one of the mechanisms for the development of tolerance. NMDAR could also interact with synaptic proteins such as PSD95 and CASK to regulate ethanol tolerance (see below in Synaptic proteins).

5.2.2. KCNQ

KCNQ is a family of voltage-gated potassium channels that play a crucial role in the regulation of the resting membrane potential and the control of neuronal excitability [101]. Ethanol has been shown to reduce the KCNQ current, and loss of KCNQ function in Drosophila increases sensitivity and tolerance to the sedative effects of ethanol [102]. Voltage-gated potassium channels like KCNQ2, KCNQ3, and KCNQ5 have been shown to be associated with ethanol consumption and preference in rodents and humans [103,104]. The administration of potassium channel opener retigabine significantly decreases alcohol drinking in rodents and alleviates alcohol-induced anxiety during withdrawal [105,106,107]. Ethanol most likely alters neuronal excitability and affects neurotransmitter release via changes in KCNQ channel activity, leading to behavioral responses to ethanol like sensitivity and tolerance.

5.2.3. BK Channel

The big potassium channel, also known as the slo1 channel, is a large conductance, calcium-, and voltage-activated potassium channel that plays a significant role in regulating neuronal excitability [108,109]. In Drosophila, the BK channels play a central role in the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol. Ethanol increases neuronal slo-1 gene expression which leads to the development of rapid tolerance, while the deletion of slo-1 results in loss of rapid tolerance [110,111]. Forward genetic screening revealed the BK channel to be one of the major targets of alcohol in C. elegans. Loss of function slo-1 mutants were resistant to the effect of ethanol. The authors also demonstrated that ethanol activates the BK channel in vivo, which leads to the inhibition of neuronal activity, and the hyperactivation of the BK channel leads to behavior similar to ethanol intoxication [42]. Ethanol exposure was shown to downregulate the expression of slo-1 in C. elegans [86]. KCNMA1, the mammalian ortholog of slo-1, has been associated with alcohol dependence in humans and other alcohol-related behaviors like sensitivity in rodents [103,112,113,114]. The role of the BK channel in alcohol-related behavior has been reviewed in detail [115,116,117,118]. In response to alcohol, the BK channel may directly modulate neuronal firing and excitation by regulating potassium conductance, which ultimately leads to changes in neurotransmitter release and subsequent behavioral changes associated with alcohol that lead to tolerance.

5.3. Synaptic Proteins

5.3.1. Dlg1

The Drosophila gene discs large 1 (dlg1), also referred to as the discs large homolog, encodes proteins DlgA and DlgS97, which are conserved orthologs of mammalian PSD-95 and SAP97 respectively. They are a member of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family of scaffolding proteins and play a key role in the organization of synapses, cell polarity, the composition of glutamate receptor subunits, and localization of calcium channels [119,120]. Loss of function mutants of dlg1, specifically encoding DlgS97 isoform, in Drosophila exhibit reduced tolerance to the sedative effects of alcohol. The authors also demonstrate that the deletion of SAP97, a mammalian homolog of dlgS97, leads to an inability to develop rapid tolerance to the sedative effects of ethanol in mice [95]. The role of dlg1 has been associated with the regulation of NMDA receptor function at the synapse, which is a known target of alcohol [93,121,122]. The authors further show that the development of rapid tolerance may involve the interaction between DlgS97 and NMDAR subunit dNR1 [95]. This interaction may be important in the clustering and anchoring of glutamatergic receptors like NMDAR to the synapse, thereby influencing synaptic plasticity and the development of tolerance.

5.3.2. CASK

CASK, also known as calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase, is a scaffolding protein in the nervous system that plays an important role in synaptic function, neurotransmitter release, courtship behavior, and locomotion [123,124,125]. The LOF mutants of CASK display increased sensitivity and decreased ethanol tolerance in flies [95]. Although CASK has not been shown to be associated with alcohol response in mammals, it is involved in the regulation of CAMKII (calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II) via autophosphorylation, which has been implicated in the behavioral effects of alcohol [123,126,127,128]. Both CASK and CAMKII have been shown to form a complex with NMDAR to mediate synaptic plasticity. Therefore, the development of tolerance may involve NMDA-mediated synaptic plasticity and synaptic organization [129,130,131].

5.3.3. Homer

Homer proteins are scaffolding proteins located within the postsynaptic membrane of excitatory synapses in the brain and are known to mediate the function, distribution, and trafficking of the glutamatergic receptors. It is essential for various neuronal processes, including synaptic plasticity, actin cytoskeleton remodeling, and intracellular calcium signaling [132]. Ethanol exposure decreases the expression of homer mRNA in Drosophila. LOF mutations of the homer gene also exhibit increased sensitivity and reduced rapid tolerance to the sedative effect of ethanol [133]. In mammals, Homer2 has been shown to play a role in the behavioral and neurochemical response to alcohol. An increase in Homer2 expression has been reported in rodent models of alcohol dependence and withdrawal [134]. Deletion of Homer2 in mice increased sensitivity to the sedative effect of ethanol [135]. Homer protein regulates neuronal function mediating postsynaptic signaling and can alter glutamatergic signaling, bringing changes in the level of excitation in the brain and ultimately altering the E/I balance leading to ethanol-induced plasticity.

5.3.4. Shibire

The shibire gene in Drosophila encodes a dynamin protein, a GTPase that plays a crucial role in endocytosis, synaptic vesicle recycling, and membrane trafficking [136]. It is required for the internalization of clathrin-coated vesicles at the plasma membrane, which is essential for various cellular processes, including neurotransmission [137]. The acquisition of rapid tolerance to ethanol in Drosophila requires the shibire genes, as demonstrated by the blocking of tolerance with the temperature-sensitive endogenous mutant allele of the gene [138]. Several proteomic studies show that the expression of dynamin-1 is significantly changed in the mammalian brain including humans after alcohol consumption, highlighting the importance of the functional protein in modulating alcohol response [139,140,141,142]. Dynamin-1 has also been shown to interact with the BK channel and other SNARE proteins to modulate vesicle release and recycling [143]. It is possible that shibire and its encoded protein dynamin are crucial for the acquisition of tolerance by promoting endocytosis and membrane cycling. Altering the activity of the protein can affect the efficacy of synaptic transmission and prevent neuroadaptation like the development of tolerance.

5.3.5. Syntaxin 1A

Syntaxin 1A is encoded by the syntaxin gene (stx1A), and it belongs to a conserved family of SNARE (soluble N- ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor) proteins that play a role in synaptic exocytosis and ion channel regulation [144]. The syntaxin proteins interact with other synaptic vesicle proteins and aid in the docking and fusion of synaptic vesicles at the presynaptic active zone in the plasma membrane, facilitating neurotransmitter release [145]. Although alcohol does not alter the mRNA expression of Syntaxin1A (syx1A), the temperature-sensitive mutant allele of syx1A failed to develop rapid tolerance in Drosophila [138]. The direct role of syntaxin in alcohol tolerance has not been studied in C. elegans. However, a single point mutation (R39C) in unc-18 [also referred to as syntaxin-binding protein 1 gene (Stxbp1)], which decreases syntaxin-binding, has been shown to increase alcohol sensitivity in a Rab-3-dependent manner [146]. Rab-3 is a small G-protein known to interact with synaptic vesicles at the active zone to regulate vesicle release. LOF mutants of rab-3 show decreased sensitivity to the effect of alcohol in both C. elegans and mice [147]. A single amino-acid polymorphism (D216N) in Munc18, the mammalian ortholog for unc-18, has been associated with alcohol preference in mouse models [148]. The transgenic mutant for unc-18 (D214N) in C. elegans reduces the sensitivity to both the stimulatory and depressive effects of alcohol [149]. In addition, Syntaxin 12 has also been found to be associated with alcohol preference in mice [150,151]. Thus, syntaxin and its interacting synaptic protein partners can regulate the release of neurotransmissions. Ethanol might change the activity of the exocytotic machinery to cause adaptation in the presynaptic active zone that leads to an alteration in neurotransmission, resulting in the imbalance of excitation and inhibition in the neural circuit to promote tolerance. Further research is required to understand the relationship between the presynaptic proteins syntaxin, rab-3, and unc-18 and their role in alcohol-mediated responses.

5.3.6. Synapsin

Synapsin is a conserved family of presynaptic proteins that play a role in the regulation of neurotransmitter release [152]. These neuronal phosphoproteins are bound to the cytoplasmic surface of the synaptic vesicles, and when phosphorylated by protein kinases (such as PKA or CAMKII), they release synaptic vesicles allowing them to move to the membrane and be released for neurotransmission [153]. Although there are contradictory results, Synapsin has been shown to be involved in the development of tolerance. Godenschwege and colleagues showed that the deletion of the Synapsin gene (Syn) in Drosophila enhances rapid tolerance to ethanol without affecting initial sensitivity [154]. However, Engel and colleagues showed that syn null flies are resistant to the effect of ethanol during first exposure and show reduced tolerance [155]. This would need further studies to decipher the exact mechanism in which synapsin is involved. This discrepancy in tolerance phenotype could be due to the initial resistance of the syn mutant and the experimental setup. Our lab recently showed that there are “primary” and “secondary” tolerance mutants and that initial resistance can impact the subsequent development of tolerance [156]. Additionally, ethanol exposure has decreased Syn expression in the Drosophila brain, and Syn is regulated by ethanol in a Sir2-dependent manner [histone deacetylases] [155]. In mammals, ethanol exposure increases the phosphorylation of synapsin in a PKA-dependent manner, highlighting the role of synapsin in presynaptic response to ethanol-induced inhibition of CNS [157]. Thus, synapsin regulates the number of synaptic vesicles available for neurotransmitter release, and ethanol might alter the activity of synapsin to cause presynaptic adaptation that increases neurotransmitter release and alters the neuronal balance. Sadanandappa and colleagues showed that when phosphorylated, synapsin promotes the mobilization and clustering of synaptic vesicles at the terminals, increasing the GABA transmission to balance the excitatory signal and promote short-term olfactory habituation [158]. Thus, this provides additional support to our argument.

5.3.7. SEB-3

SEB-3 encodes a GPCR closely related to mammalian corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors and is known to regulate stress response, locomotor activity state or arousal, and behavioral response to ethanol in C. elegans [159]. Seb-3 signaling is required for the development of ethanol preference, compulsive ethanol seeking, and tremors during ethanol withdrawal [159,160]. Loss of function mutants of seb-3 do not develop acute functional tolerance, whereas gain of function mutants show enhanced acute tolerance to ethanol [159]. CRF1 receptor has been implicated in the regulation of ethanol response in mammals. Studies have shown that crf1 receptor antagonists attenuate stress-induced increases in ethanol consumption and decrease binge-like ethanol drinking in mice and rats. Chronic consumption of ethanol dysregulates CRF signaling as shown by the increase in CRF release in the specific areas in the limbic system of alcohol-dependent rats during withdrawal [161,162]. Seb-3 or CRF receptor signaling may modulate neuronal excitability and neurotransmission via a range of G-protein-mediated intracellular signaling mechanisms to promote neuronal communication and influence ethanol-related behavior.

5.3.8. GPRK2

G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (Gprk2) belongs to the family of kinases that plays a key role in the regulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their activity. It is involved in receptor desensitization and internalization via G-protein phosphorylation leading to recruitment of β-arrestin and termination of the signal [163]. LOF mutation of Gprk2 reduces rapid tolerance after a single intoxicating exposure, increases alcohol-induced hyperactivity, and reduces sensitivity to the sedative effects of ethanol [164]. Chronic ethanol consumption in rats is associated with an increase in the binding of mu-opioid receptors with G-protein receptor kinase 2 (Grk2) in the hippocampus and is associated with the desensitization of the opioid receptor following chronic consumption [165]. Chronic alcohol consumption has also been shown to increase Grk2 expression in the nucleus accumbens shell and aid with the response to Kappa opioid receptor agonist nalfurafine to reduce excessive drinking in mice [166]. Thus, this highlights the role of GPCR in ethanol-induced response, specifically tolerance; neurons might adapt to ethanol by adjusting the activity of GPCR at the synapse to induce changes in behavior.

6. Conclusions

C. elegans and Drosophila have been widely used as model systems to study the mechanism of ethanol-induced tolerance. Studies have shown that the development of tolerance is regulated by various proteins and signaling molecules that can alter the balance between excitation or inhibition in the central nervous system. These include neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, ion channels, and synaptic proteins that are critical in the organization of synapses and can modulate synaptic plasticity by regulating neurotransmitter release and neuronal excitability (see Table 1 for a summary of various proteins and signaling molecules implicated in tolerance). The interplay of these components shapes the behavioral response to alcohol. Other genes and proteins, that are beyond the scope of this review, have been identified to have played a role in alcohol tolerance, including genes regulating alcohol metabolism (ADH), stress response (e.g., hangover, jwa), circadian rhythm (e.g., tim, per, cyc), histone deacetylase (HDAC), and learning and memory genes [167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174]. They may directly or indirectly be involved in the development and acquisition of tolerance while modulating neuronal plasticity. A comprehensive list of conserved genes involved in ethanol response in C. elegans, Drosophila, and humans has been reviewed [38].
In addition, alcohol causes epigenetic changes, which can influence the expression of alcohol-responsive genes and can lead to presynaptic adaptation, resulting in changes in neurotransmitter release in Drosophila [177,178], C. elegans [169,179,180,181], and mammals [86,182,183]. Furthermore, NPFs and their receptor play an important role in the transgenerational response to ethanol in Drosophila. Furthermore, researchers showed that maternal repression of NPF, likely via epigenetic changes, mediates transgenerational inheritance of ethanol preference in Drosophila offspring over multiple generations [184]. Flies exposed to alcohol during development exhibit several traits, including reduced viability, developmental delays, reduced brain and body sizes, and altered alcohol responses that phenocopy Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) [185,186]. Guzman and colleagues showed that pre-fertilization alcohol exposure in C. elegans can induce transgenerational effects on alcohol sensitivity in the F3 generation [187]. Thus, parental exposure to alcohol can lead to altered gene expression in subsequent generations, most likely to prime the offspring for better tolerance; however, the mechanisms underlying the transgenerational effect of alcohol exposure are still unclear.
While research shows that alcohol causes structural and functional changes in the brain to promote tolerance to ethanol, the specific brain region or the neurocircuitry necessary for the development of tolerance is still unclear. In C. elegans, the GCY-35/GCY-36—TAX-2/TAX4 signaling pathway in oxygen-sensing neurons URX has been shown to be involved in ethanol tolerance [188]. Researchers showed that Sir2 is required in the α/β lobes of the mushroom bodies (MB), the learning and memory centers of the Drosophila brain to promote ethanol sensitivity and the development of ethanol tolerance [155]. Additionally, Gprk2 and homer-mediated ethanol response in Drosophila have been mapped to specific regions in the ellipsoid body (EB) neurons, a brain region that has been linked to locomotion and sleep [133,164]. However, understanding the role of alcohol exposure on other anatomical structures might be important as well, and alcohol-associated changes in the URX, MB, and EB still need further research. In addition, understanding the relationship between initial sensitivity/resistance and tolerance could provide us with a better understanding of “primary” tolerance mutants in Drosophila and their roles in the development of alcohol tolerance.
Although much of the research on alcohol-induced tolerance in animal models focuses on motor tolerance (tolerance to sedation), adaptation to alcohol is evident in various physiological systems, such as mammalian thermoregulation and worm egg-laying [42,189,190,191]. Motor tolerance may not fully capture the complexities of addiction or AUD; it is, therefore, crucial to explore other forms of tolerance to comprehensively understand addiction. One such form of tolerance, which is a major driving force that leads to addiction and relapse in humans, is hedonic tolerance. Hedonic tolerance refers to the neurobiological adaptation that leads to a reduction in the positive and pleasurable effects that occur with repeated exposure to a substance such as alcohol and an increase in the negative effect during its abstinence [15]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this process are still unclear. It is unclear whether Drosophila or C. elegans can experience hedonic tolerance; therefore, establishing models for alcohol-induced hedonic tolerance in these invertebrates could offer us a better genetic and molecular understanding of these adaptive mechanisms and addiction in general.
In addition to invertebrates, several rodent models have demonstrated that chronic alcohol exposure induces neuroplastic changes in the brain regions, specifically in the striatum and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST). The authors further discuss that alcohol dysregulates glutamatergic, GABAergic, and neuropeptidergic signaling, similar to the invertebrate models [192]. Furthermore, GABA receptor agonists (Baclofen), GABA analog (Gabapentin), and NMDAR agonists (Acamprosate) have been used as medications to treat alcohol use disorder in clinical studies [193]. Additionally, chronic alcohol exposure decreases BDNF levels in various brain regions and has been associated with increased alcohol drinking and the development of tolerance [194,195]. Several other neurotrophins, like growth factors, have been shown to affect alcohol use in mammals, but not much has been studied in invertebrate models [196]. The role of neurotrophins in alcohol tolerance and dependence needs further research. In addition, the potential therapeutics for tolerance and dependence need to be investigated more. Drugs targeting epigenetic as well as synaptic regulators could provide new avenues for therapeutics for AUD.
Overall, the molecular mechanism underlying ethanol-induced plasticity in the context of the development of tolerance involves adaptation to different targets of alcohol that alters the balance in excitation and inhibition in the CNS. Further research is needed to fully understand these mechanisms and develop effective treatments for alcohol addiction.

Author Contributions

A.B. wrote the manuscript with input from A.S. and A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Huntsman Mental Health Institute, the University of Utah Molecular Medicine Program, and NIH: the National Institute on Drug Abuse (Grants R21DA056241 to A.R.), as well as the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (Grants R01AA026818, R01AA019536 and R01AA030881 to A.R.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Rothenfluh and Rodan labs for continued discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) in the United States: Age Groups and Demographic Characteristics | National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Available online: https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohols-effects-health/alcohol-topics/alcohol-facts-and-statistics/alcohol-use-disorder-aud-united-states-age-groups-and-demographic-characteristics (accessed on 30 May 2024).
  2. NCDAS: Substance Abuse and Addiction Statistics. 2023. Available online: https://drugabusestatistics.org/ (accessed on 30 May 2024).
  3. Gao, B.; Bataller, R. Alcoholic Liver Disease: Pathogenesis and New Therapeutic Targets. Gastroenterology 2011, 141, 1572–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mann, R.E.; Smart, R.G.; Govoni, R. The Epidemiology of Alcoholic Liver Disease. Alcohol. Res. Health 2003, 27, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. O’Keefe, J.H.; Bhatti, S.K.; Bajwa, A.; DiNicolantonio, J.J.; Lavie, C.J. Alcohol and Cardiovascular Health: The Dose Makes the Poison…or the Remedy. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2014, 89, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rocco, A.; Compare, D.; Angrisani, D.; Sanduzzi Zamparelli, M.; Nardone, G. Alcoholic Disease: Liver and Beyond. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 14652–14659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mukamal, K.J. Alcohol Use and Prognosis in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. Prev. Cardiol. 2003, 6, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. O’Keefe, E.L.; DiNicolantonio, J.J.; O’Keefe, J.H.; Lavie, C.J. Alcohol and CV Health: Jekyll and Hyde J-Curves. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2018, 61, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ronksley, P.E.; Brien, S.E.; Turner, B.J.; Mukamal, K.J.; Ghali, W.A. Association of Alcohol Consumption with Selected Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMJ 2011, 342, d671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Järvenpää, T.; Rinne, J.O.; Koskenvuo, M.; Räihä, I.; Kaprio, J. Binge Drinking in Midlife and Dementia Risk. Epidemiology 2005, 16, 766–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Solfrizzi, V.; D’Introno, A.; Colacicco, A.M.; Capurso, C.; Gagliardi, G.; Santamato, A.; Baldassarre, G.; Capurso, A.; Panza, F. Lifestyle-Related Factors, Alcohol Consumption, and Mild Cognitive Impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2007, 55, 1679–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, G.; Liu, X.; Yin, Q.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, R.; Fan, X. Alcohol Consumption and Transition of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Dementia. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2009, 63, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chandler, L.J.; Harris, R.A.; Crews, F.T. Ethanol Tolerance and Synaptic Plasticity. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1998, 19, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fadda, F.; Rossetti, Z.L. Chronic Ethanol Consumption:From Neuroadaptation to Neurodegeneration. Prog. Neurobiol. 1998, 56, 385–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Elvig, S.K.; McGinn, M.A.; Smith, C.; Arends, M.A.; Koob, G.F.; Vendruscolo, L.F. Tolerance to Alcohol: A Critical Yet Understudied Factor in Alcohol Addiction. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2021, 204, 173155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kattimani, S.; Bharadwaj, B. Clinical Management of Alcohol Withdrawal: A Systematic Review. Ind. Psychiatry J. 2013, 22, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fowler, T.; Lifford, K.; Shelton, K.; Rice, F.; Thapar, A.; Neale, M.C.; McBride, A.; van den Bree, M.B.M. Exploring the Relationship between Genetic and Environmental Influences on Initiation and Progression of Substance Use. Addiction 2007, 102, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Koopmans, J.R.; van Doornen, L.J.; Boomsma, D.I. Association between Alcohol Use and Smoking in Adolescent and Young Adult Twins: A Bivariate Genetic Analysis. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 1997, 21, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Koopmans, J.R.; Slutske, W.S.; van Baal, G.C.; Boomsma, D.I. The Influence of Religion on Alcohol Use Initiation: Evidence for Genotype X Environment Interaction. Behav. Genet. 1999, 29, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Koopmans, J.R.; Boomsma, D.I. Familial Resemblances in Alcohol Use: Genetic or Cultural Transmission? J. Stud. Alcohol. 1996, 57, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pagan, J.L.; Rose, R.J.; Viken, R.J.; Pulkkinen, L.; Kaprio, J.; Dick, D.M. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Stages of Alcohol Use across Adolescence and into Young Adulthood. Behav. Genet. 2006, 36, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5TM, 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.: Arlington, VA, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-0-89042-554-1. [Google Scholar]
  23. Flint, J.; Timpson, N.; Munafò, M. Assessing the Utility of Intermediate Phenotypes for Genetic Mapping of Psychiatric Disease. Trends Neurosci. 2014, 37, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Salvatore, J.E.; Gottesman, I.I.; Dick, D.M. Endophenotypes for Alcohol Use Disorder: An Update on the Field. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2015, 2, 76–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Parker, C.C.; Lusk, R.; Saba, L.M. Alcohol Sensitivity as an Endophenotype of Alcohol Use Disorder: Exploring Its Translational Utility between Rodents and Humans. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gilpin, N.W.; Koob, G.F. Neurobiology of Alcohol Dependence. Alcohol. Res. Health 2008, 31, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Tabakoff, B.; Cornell, N.; Hoffman, P.L. Alcohol Tolerance. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1986, 15, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bennett, R.H.; Cherek, D.R.; Spiga, R. Acute and Chronic Alcohol Tolerance in Humans: Effects of Dose and Consecutive Days of Exposure. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 1993, 17, 740–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Casbon, T.S.; Curtin, J.J.; Lang, A.R.; Patrick, C.J. Deleterious Effects of Alcohol Intoxication: Diminished Cognitive Control and Its Behavioral Consequences. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2003, 112, 476–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Scholz, H.; Mustard, J.A. Invertebrate Models of Alcoholism. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2011, 13, 433–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wolf, F.W.; Heberlein, U. Invertebrate Models of Drug Abuse. J. Neurobiol. 2003, 54, 161–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Imeh-Nathaniel, A.; Orfanakos, V.; Wormack, L.; Huber, R.; Nathaniel, T.I. The Crayfish Model (Orconectes Rusticus), Epigenetics and Drug Addiction Research. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2019, 183, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Søvik, E.; Barron, A.B. Invertebrate Models in Addiction Research. Brain Behav. Evol. 2013, 82, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. van Staaden, M.J.; Huber, R. Crayfish Learning: Addiction and the Ganglionic Brain. Perspect. Behav. Sci. 2018, 41, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Engleman, E.A.; Katner, S.N.; Neal-Beliveau, B.S. Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model to Study the Molecular and Genetic Mechanisms of Drug Addiction. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2016, 137, 229–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Katner, S.N.; Bredhold, K.E.; Steagall, K.B.; Bell, R.L.; Neal-Beliveau, B.S.; Cheong, M.C.; Engleman, E.A. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system to identify therapeutics for alcohol use disorders. Behav. Brain Res. 2019, 365, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kwon, J.Y.; Hong, M.; Choi, M.S.; Kang, S.; Duke, K.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Lee, J. Ethanol-Response Genes and Their Regulation Analyzed by a Microarray and Comparative Genomic Approach in the Nematode Caenorhabditis Elegans. Genomics 2004, 83, 600–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Grotewiel, M.; Bettinger, J.C. Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans as Discovery Platforms for Genes Involved in Human Alcohol Use Disorder. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2015, 39, 1292–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Morgan, P.G.; Sedensky, M.M. Mutations Affecting Sensitivity to Ethanol in the Nematode, Caenorhabditis Elegans. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 1995, 19, 1423–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Davies, A.G.; Bettinger, J.C.; Thiele, T.R.; Judy, M.E.; McIntire, S.L. Natural Variation in the Npr-1 Gene Modifies Ethanol Responses of Wild Strains of C. elegans. Neuron 2004, 42, 731–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Alaimo, J.T.; Davis, S.J.; Song, S.S.; Burnette, C.R.; Grotewiel, M.; Shelton, K.L.; Pierce-Shimomura, J.T.; Davies, A.G.; Bettinger, J.C. Ethanol Metabolism and Osmolarity Modify Behavioral Responses to Ethanol in C. elegans. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2012, 36, 1840–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Davies, A.G.; Pierce-Shimomura, J.T.; Kim, H.; VanHoven, M.K.; Thiele, T.R.; Bonci, A.; Bargmann, C.I.; McIntire, S.L. A Central Role of the BK Potassium Channel in Behavioral Responses to Ethanol in C. elegans. Cell 2003, 115, 655–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lee, J.; Jee, C.; McIntire, S.L. Ethanol Preference in C. elegans. Genes. Brain Behav. 2009, 8, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Singh, C.M.; Heberlein, U. Genetic Control of Acute Ethanol-Induced Behaviors in Drosophila. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2000, 24, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bainton, R.J.; Tsai, L.T.-Y.; Singh, C.M.; Moore, M.S.; Neckameyer, W.S.; Heberlein, U. Dopamine Modulates Acute Responses to Cocaine, Nicotine and Ethanol in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Parr, J.; Large, A.; Wang, X.; Fowler, S.C.; Ratzlaff, K.L.; Ruden, D.M. The Inebri-Actometer: A Device for Measuring the Locomotor Activity of Drosophila Exposed to Ethanol Vapor. J. Neurosci. Methods 2001, 107, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Devineni, A.V.; Heberlein, U. Preferential Ethanol Consumption in Drosophila Models Features of Addiction. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 2126–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Park, A.; Tran, T.; Atkinson, N.S. Monitoring Food Preference in Drosophila by Oligonucleotide Tagging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 9020–9025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Peru Y Colón de Portugal, R.L.; Ojelade, S.A.; Penninti, P.S.; Dove, R.J.; Nye, M.J.; Acevedo, S.F.; Lopez, A.; Rodan, A.R.; Rothenfluh, A. Long-Lasting, Experience-Dependent Alcohol Preference in Drosophila. Addict. Biol. 2014, 19, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cohan, F.M.; Graf, J.-D. Latitudinal cline in Drosophila melanogaster for knockdown resistance to ethanol fumes and for rates of response to selection for further resistance. Evolution 1985, 39, 278–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Scholz, H. Influence of the Biogenic Amine Tyramine on Ethanol-Induced Behaviors in Drosophila. J. Neurobiol. 2005, 63, 199–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Scholz, H.; Ramond, J.; Singh, C.M.; Heberlein, U. Functional Ethanol Tolerance in Drosophila. Neuron 2000, 28, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Robinson, B.G.; Khurana, S.; Kuperman, A.; Atkinson, N.S. Neural Adaptation Leads to Cognitive Ethanol Dependence. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 2338–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. del Valle Rodríguez, A.; Didiano, D.; Desplan, C. Power Tools for Gene Expression and Clonal Analysis in Drosophila. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Weasner, B.M.; Zhu, J.; Kumar, J.P. FLPing Genes On and Off in Drosophila. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1642, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Luan, H.; Diao, F.; Scott, R.L.; White, B.H. The Drosophila Split Gal4 System for Neural Circuit Mapping. Front. Neural Circuits 2020, 14, 603397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ewen-Campen, B.; Luan, H.; Xu, J.; Singh, R.; Joshi, N.; Thakkar, T.; Berger, B.; White, B.H.; Perrimon, N. Split-Intein Gal4 Provides Intersectional Genetic Labeling that Is Repressible by Gal80. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2304730120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Port, F.; Strein, C.; Stricker, M.; Rauscher, B.; Heigwer, F.; Zhou, J.; Beyersdörffer, C.; Frei, J.; Hess, A.; Kern, K.; et al. A Large-Scale Resource for Tissue-Specific CRISPR Mutagenesis in Drosophila. eLife 2020, 9, e53865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Heigwer, F.; Port, F.; Boutros, M. RNA Interference (RNAi) Screening in Drosophila. Genetics 2018, 208, 853–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Rodan, A.R.; Kiger, J.A.; Heberlein, U. Functional Dissection of Neuroanatomical Loci Regulating Ethanol Sensitivity in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 9490–9501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Peru Y Colón de Portugal, R.L.; Acevedo, S.F.; Rodan, A.R.; Chang, L.Y.; Eaton, B.A.; Rothenfluh, A. Adult Neuronal Arf6 Controls Ethanol-Induced Behavior with Arfaptin Downstream of Rac1 and RhoGAP18B. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 17706–17713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rothenfluh, A.; Threlkeld, R.J.; Bainton, R.J.; Tsai, L.T.-Y.; Lasek, A.W.; Heberlein, U. Distinct Behavioral Responses to Ethanol Are Regulated by Alternate RhoGAP18B Isoforms. Cell 2006, 127, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chvilicek, M.M.; Titos, I.; Rothenfluh, A. The Neurotransmitters Involved in Drosophila Alcohol-Induced Behaviors. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 607700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bier, E. Drosophila, the Golden Bug, Emerges as a Tool for Human Genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lai, C.-H.; Chou, C.-Y.; Ch’ang, L.-Y.; Liu, C.-S.; Lin, W. Identification of Novel Human Genes Evolutionarily Conserved in Caenorhabditis elegans by Comparative Proteomics. Genome Res. 2000, 10, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gonzalez, D.A.; Jia, T.; Pinzón, J.H.; Acevedo, S.F.; Ojelade, S.A.; Xu, B.; Tay, N.; Desrivières, S.; Hernandez, J.L.; Banaschewski, T.; et al. The Arf6 Activator Efa6/PSD3 Confers Regional Specificity and Modulates Ethanol Consumption in Drosophila and Humans. Mol. Psychiatry 2018, 23, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Murnane, K.S.; Edinoff, A.N.; Cornett, E.M.; Kaye, A.D. Updated Perspectives on the Neurobiology of Substance Use Disorders Using Neuroimaging. Subst. Abuse Rehabil. 2023, 14, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Nieto, S.J.; Grodin, E.N.; Aguirre, C.G.; Izquierdo, A.; Ray, L.A. Translational Opportunities in Animal and Human Models to Study Alcohol Use Disorder. Transl. Psychiatry 2021, 11, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Roeder, T. Octopamine in Invertebrates. Prog. Neurobiol. 1999, 59, 533–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Claßen, G.; Scholz, H. Octopamine Shifts the Behavioral Response From Indecision to Approach or Aversion in Drosophila Melanogaster. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Schneider, A.; Ruppert, M.; Hendrich, O.; Giang, T.; Ogueta, M.; Hampel, S.; Vollbach, M.; Büschges, A.; Scholz, H. Neuronal Basis of Innate Olfactory Attraction to Ethanol in Drosophila. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Tabakoff, B.; Ritzmann, R.F. The Effects of 6-Hydroxydopamine on Tolerance to and Dependence on Ethanol. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1977, 203, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. de Bono, M.; Bargmann, C.I. Natural Variation in a Neuropeptide Y Receptor Homolog Modifies Social Behavior and Food Response in C. elegans. Cell 1998, 94, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Soto, R.; Goetting, D.L.; Van Buskirk, C. NPR-1 Modulates Plasticity in C. elegans Stress-Induced Sleep. iScience 2019, 19, 1037–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kacsoh, B.Z.; Lynch, Z.R.; Mortimer, N.T.; Schlenke, T.A. Fruit Flies Medicate Offspring after Seeing Parasites. Science 2013, 339, 947–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Shohat-Ophir, G.; Kaun, K.R.; Azanchi, R.; Mohammed, H.; Heberlein, U. Sexual Deprivation Increases Ethanol Intake in Drosophila. Science 2012, 335, 1351–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wen, T.; Parrish, C.A.; Xu, D.; Wu, Q.; Shen, P. Drosophila Neuropeptide F and Its Receptor, NPFR1, Define a Signaling Pathway that Acutely Modulates Alcohol Sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 2141–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Thorsell, A.; Mathé, A.A. Neuropeptide Y in Alcohol Addiction and Affective Disorders. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Gilpin, N.W.; Misra, K.; Herman, M.A.; Cruz, M.T.; Koob, G.F.; Roberto, M. Neuropeptide Y Opposes Alcohol Effects on GABA Release in Amygdala and Blocks the Transition to Alcohol Dependence. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 69, 1091–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Davies, M. The Role of GABAA Receptors in Mediating the Effects of Alcohol in the Central Nervous System. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2003, 28, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  81. Kulonen, E. Ethanol and GABA. Med. Biol. 1983, 61, 147–167. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Daack, C.W.; Yeh, D.; Busch, M.; Kliethermes, C.L. GABAergic Regulation of Locomotion before and during an Ethanol Exposure in Drosophila Melanogaster. Behav. Brain Res. 2021, 410, 113369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Dimitrijevic, N.; Dzitoyeva, S.; Satta, R.; Imbesi, M.; Yildiz, S.; Manev, H. Drosophila GABAB Receptors Are Involved in Behavioral Effects of γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB). Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 519, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Dzitoyeva, S.; Dimitrijevic, N.; Manev, H. γ-Aminobutyric Acid B Receptor 1 Mediates Behavior-Impairing Actions of Alcohol in Drosophila: Adult RNA Interference and Pharmacological Evidence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 5485–5490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ranson, D.C.; Ayoub, S.S.; Corcoran, O.; Casalotti, S.O. Pharmacological Targeting of the GABA B Receptor Alters Drosophila’s Behavioural Responses to Alcohol. Addict. Biol. 2020, 25, e12725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Sterken, M.G.; van Wijk, M.H.; Quamme, E.C.; Riksen, J.A.G.; Carnell, L.; Mathies, L.D.; Davies, A.G.; Kammenga, J.E.; Bettinger, J.C. Transcriptional Analysis of the Response of C. elegans to Ethanol Exposure. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Agabio, R.; Maccioni, P.; Carai, M.A.M.; Luigi Gessa, G.; Froestl, W.; Colombo, G. The Development of Medications for Alcohol-Use Disorders Targeting the GABAB Receptor System. Recent Pat. CNS Drug Discov. 2012, 7, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Agabio, R.; Colombo, G. GABAB Receptor Ligands for the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence. Front. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Cousins, M.S.; Roberts, D.C.S.; de Wit, H. GABAB Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Drug Addiction: A Review of Recent Findings. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002, 65, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zaleski, M.J.; Nunes Filho, J.R.; Lemos, T.; Morato, G.S. GABA(B) Receptors Play a Role in the Development of Tolerance to Ethanol in Mice. Psychopharmacology 2001, 153, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Allgaier, C. Ethanol Sensitivity of NMDA Receptors. Neurochem. Int. 2002, 41, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Hoffman, P.L.; Rabe, C.S.; Grant, K.A.; Valverius, P.; Hudspith, M.; Tabakoff, B. Ethanol and the NMDA Receptor. Alcohol 1990, 7, 229–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Nagy, J. Alcohol Related Changes in Regulation of NMDA Receptor Functions. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2008, 6, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Troutwine, B.; Park, A.; Velez-Hernandez, M.E.; Lew, L.; Mihic, S.J.; Atkinson, N.S. F654A and K558Q Mutations in NMDA Receptor 1 Affect Ethanol-Induced Behaviors in Drosophila. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2019, 43, 2480–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Maiya, R.; Lee, S.; Berger, K.H.; Kong, E.C.; Slawson, J.B.; Griffith, L.C.; Takamiya, K.; Huganir, R.L.; Margolis, B.; Heberlein, U. DlgS97/SAP97, a Neuronal Isoform of Discs Large, Regulates Ethanol Tolerance. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Grover, C.A.; Frye, G.D.; Griffith, W.H. Acute Tolerance to Ethanol Inhibition of NMDA-Mediated EPSPs in the CA1 Region of the Rat Hippocampus. Brain Res. 1994, 642, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Yaka, R.; Phamluong, K.; Ron, D. Scaffolding of Fyn Kinase to the NMDA Receptor Determines Brain Region Sensitivity to Ethanol. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 3623–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Khanna, J.; Wu, P.H.; Weiner, J.; Kalant, H. NMDA Antagonist Inhibits Rapid Tolerance to Ethanol. Brain Res. Bull. 1991, 26, 643–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Khanna, J.M.; Kalant, H.; Shah, G.; Chau, A. Effect of (+)MK-801 and Ketamine on Rapid Tolerance to Ethanol. Brain Res. Bull. 1992, 28, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Szabó, G.; Tabakoff, B.; Hoffman, P.L. The NMDA Receptor Antagonist Dizocilpine Differentially Affects Environment-Dependent and Environment-Independent Ethanol Tolerance. Psychopharmacology 1994, 113, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Wulff, H.; Castle, N.A.; Pardo, L.A. Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels as Therapeutic Drug Targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 982–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Cavaliere, S.; Gillespie, J.M.; Hodge, J.J.L. KCNQ Channels Show Conserved Ethanol Block and Function in Ethanol Behaviour. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kendler, K.S.; Kalsi, G.; Holmans, P.A.; Sanders, A.R.; Aggen, S.H.; Dick, D.M.; Aliev, F.; Shi, J.; Levinson, D.F.; Gejman, P.V. Association Analysis of Symptoms of Alcohol Dependence in the Molecular Genetics of Schizophrenia (MGS2) Control Sample. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2011, 35, 963–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rinker, J.A.; Fulmer, D.B.; Trantham-Davidson, H.; Smith, M.L.; Williams, R.W.; Lopez, M.F.; Randall, P.K.; Chandler, L.J.; Miles, M.F.; Becker, H.C.; et al. Differential Potassium Channel Gene Regulation in BXD Mice Reveals Novel Targets for Pharmacogenetic Therapies to Reduce Heavy Alcohol Drinking. Alcohol 2017, 58, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kang, S.; Li, J.; Zuo, W.; Fu, R.; Gregor, D.; Krnjevic, K.; Bekker, A.; Ye, J.-H. Ethanol Withdrawal Drives Anxiety-Related Behaviors by Reducing M-Type Potassium Channel Activity in the Lateral Habenula. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017, 42, 1813–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Knapp, C.M.; O’Malley, M.; Datta, S.; Ciraulo, D.A. The Kv7 Potassium Channel Activator Retigabine Decreases Alcohol Consumption in Rats. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 2014, 40, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. McGuier, N.S.; Griffin, W.C.; Gass, J.T.; Padula, A.E.; Chesler, E.J.; Mulholland, P.J. Kv7 Channels in the Nucleus Accumbens Are Altered by Chronic Drinking and Are Targets for Reducing Alcohol Consumption. Addict. Biol. 2016, 21, 1097–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Ancatén-González, C.; Segura, I.; Alvarado-Sánchez, R.; Chávez, A.E.; Latorre, R. Ca2+- and Voltage-Activated K+ (BK) Channels in the Nervous System: One Gene, a Myriad of Physiological Functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Atkinson, N.S.; Robertson, G.A.; Ganetzky, B. A Component of Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels Encoded by the Drosophila Slo Locus. Science 1991, 253, 551–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Cowmeadow, R.B.; Krishnan, H.R.; Atkinson, N.S. The Slowpoke Gene Is Necessary for Rapid Ethanol Tolerance in Drosophila. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2005, 29, 1777–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Cowmeadow, R.B.; Krishnan, H.R.; Ghezzi, A.; Al’Hasan, Y.M.; Wang, Y.Z.; Atkinson, N.S. Ethanol Tolerance Caused by Slowpoke Induction in Drosophila. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2006, 30, 745–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Adkins, A.E.; Hack, L.M.; Bigdeli, T.B.; Williamson, V.S.; McMichael, G.O.; Mamdani, M.; Edwards, A.; Aliev, F.; Chan, R.F.; Bhandari, P.; et al. Genomewide Association Study of Alcohol Dependence Identifies Risk Loci Altering Ethanol-Response Behaviors in Model Organisms. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2017, 41, 911–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Dopico, A.M.; Bukiya, A.N.; Martin, G.E. Ethanol Modulation of Mammalian BK Channels in Excitable Tissues: Molecular Targets and Their Possible Contribution to Alcohol-Induced Altered Behavior. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 120404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Edenberg, H.J.; Koller, D.L.; Xuei, X.; Wetherill, L.; McClintick, J.N.; Almasy, L.; Bierut, L.J.; Bucholz, K.K.; Goate, A.; Aliev, F.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Study of Alcohol Dependence Implicates a Region on Chromosome 11. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2010, 34, 840–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Bettinger, J.C.; Davies, A.G. The Role of the BK Channel in Ethanol Response Behaviors: Evidence from Model Organism and Human Studies. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Dopico, A.M.; Bukiya, A.N.; Kuntamallappanavar, G.; Liu, J. Modulation of BK Channels by Ethanol. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2016, 128, 239–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Martin, G.E. Bk Channel and Alcohol, a Complicated Affair. In International Review of Neurobiology; Reilly, M.T., Lovinger, D.M., Eds.; Functional Plasticity and Genetic Variation: Insights into the Neurobiology of Alcoholism; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010; Volume 91, pp. 321–338. [Google Scholar]
  118. Treistman, S.N.; Martin, G.E. BK Channels: Mediators and Models for Alcohol Tolerance. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Mendoza, C.; Olguín, P.; Lafferte, G.; Thomas, U.; Ebitsch, S.; Gundelfinger, E.D.; Kukuljan, M.; Sierralta, J. Novel Isoforms of Dlg Are Fundamental for Neuronal Development in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 2093–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Woods, D.F.; Bryant, P.J. The Discs-Large Tumor Suppressor Gene of Drosophila Encodes a Guanylate Kinase Homolog Localized at Septate Junctions. Cell 1991, 66, 451–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Bassand, P.; Bernard, A.; Rafiki, A.; Gayet, D.; Khrestchatisky, M. Differential Interaction of the tSXV Motifs of the NR1 and NR2A NMDA Receptor Subunits with PSD-95 and SAP97. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1999, 11, 2031–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Niethammer, M.; Kim, E.; Sheng, M. Interaction between the C Terminus of NMDA Receptor Subunits and Multiple Members of the PSD-95 Family of Membrane-Associated Guanylate Kinases. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 2157–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Lu, C.S.; Hodge, J.J.L.; Mehren, J.; Sun, X.X.; Griffith, L.C. Regulation of the Ca2+/CaM-Responsive Pool of CaMKII by Scaffold-Dependent Autophosphorylation. Neuron 2003, 40, 1185–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Slawson, J.B.; Kuklin, E.A.; Ejima, A.; Mukherjee, K.; Ostrovsky, L.; Griffith, L.C. Central Regulation of Locomotor Behavior of Drosophila Melanogaster Depends on a CASK Isoform Containing CaMK-Like and L27 Domains. Genetics 2011, 187, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zordan, M.A.; Massironi, M.; Ducato, M.G.; te Kronnie, G.; Costa, R.; Reggiani, C.; Chagneau, C.; Martin, J.-R.; Megighian, A. Drosophila CAKI/CMG Protein, a Homolog of Human CASK, Is Essential for Regulation of Neurotransmitter Vesicle Release. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94, 1074–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Cały, A.; Ziółkowska, M.; Pagano, R.; Salamian, A.; Śliwińska, M.A.; Sotoudeh, N.; Bernaś, T.; Radwanska, K. Autophosphorylation of αCaMKII Regulates Alcohol Consumption by Controlling Sedative Effects of Alcohol and Alcohol-Induced Loss of Excitatory Synapses. Addict. Biol. 2023, 28, e13276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Easton, A.C.; Lucchesi, W.; Lourdusamy, A.; Lenz, B.; Solati, J.; Golub, Y.; Lewczuk, P.; Fernandes, C.; Desrivieres, S.; Dawirs, R.R.; et al. αCaMKII Autophosphorylation Controls the Establishment of Alcohol Drinking Behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38, 1636–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Hodge, J.J.L.; Mullasseril, P.; Griffith, L.C. Activity-Dependent Gating of CaMKII Autonomous Activity by Drosophila CASK. Neuron 2006, 51, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Jeyifous, O.; Waites, C.L.; Specht, C.G.; Fujisawa, S.; Schubert, M.; Lin, E.; Marshall, J.; Aoki, C.; de Silva, T.; Montgomery, J.M.; et al. SAP97 and CASK Mediate Sorting of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors through a Novel Secretory Pathway. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12, 1011–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lin, E.I.; Jeyifous, O.; Green, W.N. CASK Regulates SAP97 Conformation and Its Interactions with AMPA and NMDA Receptors. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 12067–12076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sanhueza, M.; Lisman, J. The CaMKII/NMDAR Complex as a Molecular Memory. Mol. Brain 2013, 6, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Ehrengruber, M.U.; Kato, A.; Inokuchi, K.; Hennou, S. Homer/Vesl Proteins and Their Roles in CNS Neurons. Mol. Neurobiol. 2004, 29, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Urizar, N.L.; Yang, Z.; Edenberg, H.J.; Davis, R.L. Drosophila Homer Is Required in a Small Set of Neurons Including the Ellipsoid Body for Normal Ethanol Sensitivity and Tolerance. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 4541–4551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Castelli, V.; Brancato, A.; Cavallaro, A.; Lavanco, G.; Cannizzaro, C. Homer2 and Alcohol: A Mutual Interaction. Front. Psychiatry 2017, 8, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Szumlinski, K.K.; Lominac, K.D.; Oleson, E.B.; Walker, J.K.; Mason, A.; Dehoff, M.H.; Klugman, M.; Cagle, S.; Welt, K.; During, M.; et al. Homer2 Is Necessary for EtOH-Induced Neuroplasticity. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 7054–7061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. van der Bliek, A.M.; Meyerowrtz, E.M. Dynamin-like Protein Encoded by the Drosophila Shibire Gene Associated with Vesicular Traffic. Nature 1991, 351, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Ferguson, S.M.; De Camilli, P. Dynamin, a Membrane Remodelling GTPase. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Krishnan, H.R.; Al-Hasan, Y.M.; Pohl, J.B.; Ghezzi, A.; Atkinson, N.S. A Role for Dynamin in Triggering Ethanol Tolerance. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2012, 36, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Alexander-Kaufman, K.; Cordwell, S.; Harper, C.; Matsumoto, I. A Proteome Analysis of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Human Alcoholic Patients. Proteom.—Clin. Appl. 2007, 1, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Etheridge, N.; Lewohl, J.M.; Mayfield, R.D.; Harris, R.A.; Dodd, P.R. Synaptic Proteome Changes in the Superior Frontal Gyrus and Occipital Cortex of the Alcoholic Brain. Proteom.—Clin. Appl. 2009, 3, 730–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Etheridge, N.; Mayfield, R.D.; Harris, R.A.; Dodd, P.R. Identifying Changes in the Synaptic Proteome of Cirrhotic Alcoholic Superior Frontal Gyrus. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2011, 9, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Gorini, G.; Roberts, A.J.; Mayfield, R.D. Neurobiological Signatures of Alcohol Dependence Revealed by Protein Profiling. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Gorini, G.; Ponomareva, O.; Shores, K.S.; Person, M.D.; Harris, R.A.; Mayfield, R.D. Dynamin-1 Co-Associates with Native Mouse Brain BKCa Channels: Proteomics Analysis of Synaptic Protein Complexes. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Teng, F.Y.H.; Wang, Y.; Tang, B.L. The Syntaxins. Genome Biol. 2001, 2, reviews3012.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Bennett, M.K.; Calakos, N.; Scheller, R.H. Syntaxin: A Synaptic Protein Implicated in Docking of Synaptic Vesicles at Presynaptic Active Zones. Science 1992, 257, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Johnson, J.R.; Kashyap, S.; Rankin, K.; Barclay, J.W. Rab-3 and Unc-18 Interactions in Alcohol Sensitivity Are Distinct from Synaptic Transmission. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Kapfhamer, D.; Bettinger, J.C.; Davies, A.G.; Eastman, C.L.; Smail, E.A.; Heberlein, U.; McIntire, S.L. Loss of RAB-3/A in C. elegans and the Mouse Affects Behavioral Response to Ethanol. Genes. Brain Behav. 2008, 7, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Fehr, C.; Shirley, R.L.; Crabbe, J.C.; Belknap, J.K.; Buck, K.J.; Phillips, T.J. The Syntaxin Binding Protein 1 Gene (Stxbp1) Is a Candidate for an Ethanol Preference Drinking Locus on Mouse Chromosome 2. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2005, 29, 708–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Graham, M.E.; Edwards, M.R.; Holden-Dye, L.; Morgan, A.; Burgoyne, R.D.; Barclay, J.W. UNC-18 Modulates Ethanol Sensitivity in Caenorhabditis Elegans. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Treadwell, J.A.; Pagniello, K.B.; Singh, S.M. Genetic Segregation of Brain Gene Expression Identifies Retinaldehyde Binding Protein 1 and Syntaxin 12 as Potential Contributors to Ethanol Preference in Mice. Behav. Genet. 2004, 34, 425–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Weng, J.; Symons, M.N.; Singh, S.M. Studies on Syntaxin 12 and Alcohol Preference Involving C57BL/6J and DBA/2J Strains of Mice. Behav. Genet. 2009, 39, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Kao, H.T.; Porton, B.; Hilfiker, S.; Stefani, G.; Pieribone, V.A.; DeSalle, R.; Greengard, P. Molecular Evolution of the Synapsin Gene Family. J. Exp. Zool. 1999, 285, 360–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Bykhovskaia, M. Synapsin Regulation of Vesicle Organization and Functional Pools. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Godenschwege, T.A.; Reisch, D.; Diegelmann, S.; Eberle, K.; Funk, N.; Heisenberg, M.; Hoppe, V.; Hoppe, J.; Klagges, B.R.E.; Martin, J.-R.; et al. Flies Lacking All Synapsins Are Unexpectedly Healthy but Are Impaired in Complex Behaviour. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 20, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Engel, G.L.; Marella, S.; Kaun, K.R.; Wu, J.; Adhikari, P.; Kong, E.C.; Wolf, F.W. Sir2/Sirt1 Links Acute Inebriation to Presynaptic Changes and the Development of Alcohol Tolerance, Preference, and Reward. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 5241–5251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Chvilicek, M.M.; Seguin, A.; Lathen, D.R.; Titos, I.; Cummins-Beebee, P.N.; Pabon, M.A.; Miščević, M.; Nickel, E.; Merrill, C.B.; Rodan, A.R.; et al. Large Analysis of Genetic Manipulations Reveals an Inverse Correlation between Initial Alcohol Resistance and Rapid Tolerance Phenotypes. Genes Brain Behav. 2024, 23, e12884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Conti, A.C.; Maas, J.W.; Moulder, K.L.; Jiang, X.; Dave, B.A.; Mennerick, S.; Muglia, L.J. Adenylyl Cyclases 1 and 8 Initiate a Presynaptic Homeostatic Response to Ethanol Treatment. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Sadanandappa, M.K.; Blanco Redondo, B.; Michels, B.; Rodrigues, V.; Gerber, B.; VijayRaghavan, K.; Buchner, E.; Ramaswami, M. Synapsin Function in GABA-Ergic Interneurons Is Required for Short-Term Olfactory Habituation. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 16576–16585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Jee, C.; Lee, J.; Lim, J.P.; Parry, D.; Messing, R.O.; McIntire, S.L. SEB-3, a CRF Receptor-like GPCR, Regulates Locomotor Activity States, Stress Responses and Ethanol Tolerance in Caenorhabditis Elegans. Genes. Brain Behav. 2013, 12, 250–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Salim, C.; Kan, A.K.; Batsaikhan, E.; Patterson, E.C.; Jee, C. Neuropeptidergic Regulation of Compulsive Ethanol Seeking in C. elegans. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Becker, H.C. Effects of Alcohol Dependence and Withdrawal on Stress Responsiveness and Alcohol Consumption. Alcohol. Res. 2012, 34, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  162. Koob, G.F. A Role for Brain Stress Systems in Addiction. Neuron 2008, 59, 11–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Reiter, E.; Lefkowitz, R.J. GRKs and β-Arrestins: Roles in Receptor Silencing, Trafficking and Signaling. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 17, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Kang, Y.Y.; Wachi, Y.; Engdorf, E.; Fumagalli, E.; Wang, Y.; Myers, J.; Massey, S.; Greiss, A.; Xu, S.; Roman, G. Normal Ethanol Sensitivity and Rapid Tolerance Require the G Protein Receptor Kinase 2 in Ellipsoid Body Neurons in Drosophila. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2020, 44, 1686–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Saland, L.C.; Chavez, J.B.; Lee, D.C.; Garcia, R.R.; Caldwell, K.K. Chronic Ethanol Exposure Increases the Association of Hippocampal Mu-Opioid Receptors with G-Protein Receptor Kinase 2 (GRK2). Alcohol 2008, 42, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Zhou, Y.; Liang, Y. Involvement of GRK2 in Modulating Nalfurafine-Induced Reduction of Excessive Alcohol Drinking in Mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2021, 760, 136092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Berger, K.H.; Kong, E.C.; Dubnau, J.; Tully, T.; Moore, M.S.; Heberlein, U. Ethanol Sensitivity and Tolerance in Long-Term Memory Mutants of Drosophila Melanogaster. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2008, 32, 895–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Li, C.; Zhao, X.; Cao, X.; Chu, D.; Chen, J.; Zhou, J. The Drosophila Homolog of Jwa Is Required for Ethanol Tolerance. Alcohol Alcohol. 2008, 43, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Mathies, L.D.; Lindsay, J.H.; Handal, A.P.; Blackwell, G.G.; Davies, A.G.; Bettinger, J.C. SWI/SNF Complexes Act through CBP-1 Histone Acetyltransferase to Regulate Acute Functional Tolerance to Alcohol. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Pohl, J.B.; Ghezzi, A.; Lew, L.K.; Robles, R.B.; Cormack, L.; Atkinson, N.S. Circadian Genes Differentially Affect Tolerance to Ethanol in Drosophila. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2013, 37, 1862–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Riley, B.P.; Kalsi, G.; Kuo, P.-H.; Vladimirov, V.; Thiselton, D.L.; Vittum, J.; Wormley, B.; Grotewiel, M.S.; Patterson, D.G.; Sullivan, P.F.; et al. Alcohol Dependence Is Associated with the ZNF699 Gene, a Human Locus Related to Drosophila Hangover, in the Irish Affected Sib Pair Study of Alcohol Dependence (IASPSAD) Sample. Mol. Psychiatry 2006, 11, 1025–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Sakharkar, A.J.; Zhang, H.; Tang, L.; Shi, G.; Pandey, S.C. Histone Deacetylases (HDAC)-Induced Histone Modifications in the Amygdala: A Role in Rapid Tolerance to the Anxiolytic Effects of Ethanol. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2012, 36, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Scholz, H.; Franz, M.; Heberlein, U. The Hangover Gene Defines a Stress Pathway Required for Ethanol Tolerance Development. Nature 2005, 436, 845–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Wang, S.P.; Althoff, D.M. Different Genetic Basis for Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity and Plasticity in a Novel Alcohol Environment for Drosophila Melanogaster. Heredity 2020, 125, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Thiele, T.E.; Marsh, D.J.; Ste. Marie, L.; Bernstein, I.L.; Palmiter, R.D. Ethanol Consumption and Resistance Are Inversely Related to Neuropeptide Y Levels. Nature 1998, 396, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Olsen, R.W.; Liang, J. Role of GABAA Receptors in Alcohol Use Disorders Suggested by Chronic Intermittent Ethanol (CIE) Rodent Model. Mol. Brain 2017, 10, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Shukla, S.D.; Velazquez, J.; French, S.W.; Lu, S.C.; Ticku, M.K.; Zakhari, S. Emerging Role of Epigenetics in the Actions of Alcohol. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2008, 32, 1525–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Ramirez-Roman, M.E.; Billini, C.E.; Ghezzi, A. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Alcohol Neuroadaptation: Insights from Drosophila. J. Exp. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 1179069518779809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Mathies, L.D.; Blackwell, G.G.; Austin, M.K.; Edwards, A.C.; Riley, B.P.; Davies, A.G.; Bettinger, J.C. SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Regulates Alcohol Response Behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans and Is Associated with Alcohol Dependence in Humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 3032–3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Chang, R.C.; Thomas, K.N.; Mehta, N.A.; Veazey, K.J.; Parnell, S.E.; Golding, M.C. Programmed Suppression of Oxidative Phosphorylation and Mitochondrial Function by Gestational Alcohol Exposure Correlate with Widespread Increases in H3K9me2 that Do Not Suppress Transcription. Epigenetics Chromatin 2021, 14, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Krishnan, H.R.; Li, X.; Ghezzi, A.; Atkinson, N.S. A DNA Element in the Slo Gene Modulates Ethanol Tolerance. Alcohol 2016, 51, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Malherbe, D.C.; Messaoudi, I. Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Monocyte and Macrophage Dysfunction by Chronic Alcohol Consumption. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 911951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Wu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, J. Epigenetic Modification in Alcohol Use Disorder and Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Opportunities. Metabolism 2021, 125, 154909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Bozler, J.; Kacsoh, B.Z.; Bosco, G. Transgenerational Inheritance of Ethanol Preference Is Caused by Maternal NPF Repression. eLife 2019, 8, e45391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Mokashi, S.S.; Shankar, V.; MacPherson, R.A.; Hannah, R.C.; Mackay, T.F.C.; Anholt, R.R.H. Developmental Alcohol Exposure in Drosophila: Effects on Adult Phenotypes and Gene Expression in the Brain. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 699033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. McClure, K.D.; French, R.L.; Heberlein, U. A Drosophila Model for Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Disorders: Role for the Insulin Pathway. Dis. Model. Mech. 2011, 4, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Guzman, D.M.; Chakka, K.; Shi, T.; Marron, A.; Fiorito, A.E.; Rahman, N.S.; Ro, S.; Sucich, D.G.; Pierce, J.T. Transgenerational Effects of Alcohol on Behavioral Sensitivity to Alcohol in Caenorhabditis Elegans. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0271849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Chen, Y.-H.; Ge, C.-L.; Wang, H.; Ge, M.-H.; He, Q.-Q.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, W.; Wu, Z.-X. GCY-35/GCY-36-TAX-2/TAX-4 Signalling in O2 Sensory Neurons Mediates Acute Functional Ethanol Tolerance in Caenorhabditis Elegans. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Lê, A.D.; Poulos, C.X.; Cappell, H. Conditioned Tolerance to the Hypothermic Effect of Ethyl Alcohol. Science 1979, 206, 1109–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Ozburn, A.R.; Harris, R.A.; Blednov, Y.A. Chronic Voluntary Alcohol Consumption Results in Tolerance to Sedative/Hypnotic and Hypothermic Effects of Alcohol in Hybrid Mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2013, 104, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Rustay, N.R.; Boehm, S.L.; Schafer, G.L.; Browman, K.E.; Erwin, V.G.; Crabbe, J.C. Sensitivity and Tolerance to Ethanol-Induced Incoordination and Hypothermia in HAFT and LAFT Mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2001, 70, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Lovinger, D.M.; Kash, T.L. Mechanisms of Neuroplasticity and Ethanol’s Effects on Plasticity in the Striatum and Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis. Alcohol. Res. 2015, 37, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  193. Witkiewitz, K.; Litten, R.Z.; Leggio, L. Advances in the Science and Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaax4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Pandey, S.C. A Critical Role of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Alcohol Consumption. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 79, 427–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Peregud, D.I.; Baronets, V.Y.; Terebilina, N.N.; Gulyaeva, N.V. Role of BDNF in Neuroplasticity Associated with Alcohol Dependence. Biochem. Mosc. 2023, 88, 404–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Liran, M.; Rahamim, N.; Ron, D.; Barak, S. Growth Factors and Alcohol Use Disorder. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2020, 10, a039271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 25 06838 g001
Figure 1. Dynamics of inhibitory (I) and excitatory (E) state of a neural circuit in response to ethanol (EtOH). Neuronal excitation and inhibition are balanced in the naive state (a). Exposure to ethanol alters this balance by increasing inhibition in the CNS, leading to sedation (b). To counteract the increased inhibition caused by ethanol, the CNS responds by increasing excitation (c). This adaptation leads to a new state where the balance between excitation and inhibition is achieved (d). This rebalanced state, achieved through the compensatory increase in excitation, is known as tolerance.
Figure 1. Dynamics of inhibitory (I) and excitatory (E) state of a neural circuit in response to ethanol (EtOH). Neuronal excitation and inhibition are balanced in the naive state (a). Exposure to ethanol alters this balance by increasing inhibition in the CNS, leading to sedation (b). To counteract the increased inhibition caused by ethanol, the CNS responds by increasing excitation (c). This adaptation leads to a new state where the balance between excitation and inhibition is achieved (d). This rebalanced state, achieved through the compensatory increase in excitation, is known as tolerance.
Ijms 25 06838 g001
Ijms 25 06838 g002
Figure 2. Different types of tolerance determined in invertebrates. (A) Schematic of development of acute functional tolerance in C. elegans during a single session of ethanol exposure. C. elegans respond to ethanol by first increasing their movement (or body bends) followed by progressive lack of coordination and eventual immobility within 10 min of exposure. After 30 min, they recover their locomotion speed despite the continued presence of ethanol on the agar plate, indicating the development of acute tolerance. (B) Schematic of rapid tolerance in Drosophila. The flies are exposed to ethanol vapor by pipetting it onto the vial plugs. After 22 min of exposure, all the flies become sedated. Flies are left to recover for 4 h, which allows the ethanol from the first exposure to be fully metabolized. When the flies are re-exposed to the same dose of ethanol, they take longer to be sedated than the first exposure, indicating the development of rapid tolerance.
Figure 2. Different types of tolerance determined in invertebrates. (A) Schematic of development of acute functional tolerance in C. elegans during a single session of ethanol exposure. C. elegans respond to ethanol by first increasing their movement (or body bends) followed by progressive lack of coordination and eventual immobility within 10 min of exposure. After 30 min, they recover their locomotion speed despite the continued presence of ethanol on the agar plate, indicating the development of acute tolerance. (B) Schematic of rapid tolerance in Drosophila. The flies are exposed to ethanol vapor by pipetting it onto the vial plugs. After 22 min of exposure, all the flies become sedated. Flies are left to recover for 4 h, which allows the ethanol from the first exposure to be fully metabolized. When the flies are re-exposed to the same dose of ethanol, they take longer to be sedated than the first exposure, indicating the development of rapid tolerance.
Ijms 25 06838 g002
Table 1. Molecular pathways involved in functional alcohol tolerance relating to plasticity in invertebrate models and their associated mammalian phenotype.
Table 1. Molecular pathways involved in functional alcohol tolerance relating to plasticity in invertebrate models and their associated mammalian phenotype.
NameInvertebrate ModelGeneGene FunctionMutantAUD-Related Behavior in InvertebratesAssayDosePhenotype in MammalsReferences
OctopamineFlytyramine β-hydroxylase (TβH)Rate-limiting enzyme for octopamine synthesis.LOF mutant [TβHnM18]LOF mutants exhibit reduced rapid tolerance.Inebriometer50/45 ethanol/airNorepinephrine depletion in the brain before exposure prevents the development of tolerance in mice.[52,72]
Neuropeptide ReceptorWormnpr-1Neuropeptide Y-like receptor.LOF mutant [npr-1]LOF mutants show increased acute functional tolerance (AFT).Rate of locomotion500 mM ethanol exposure for 10, 30, or 50 minNPY-deficient mice show increased alcohol consumption, are less sensitive to the effects of alcohol, and make a quick recovery after alcohol sedation. NPY overexpression shows low preference for alcohol and is more sensitive to the sedative effects of alcohol.[40,77,175]
FlyNPF/NPFRNeuropeptide F receptor. NPY-deficient flies show decreased alcohol sensitivity, whereas overexpression leads to increased sensitivity to the effects of alcohol.Time to sedation [Ethanol pipetted in Kim wipes and placed at the bottom of a fly bottle].10%, 31%, 54%, or 100% ethanol vapor until complete sedation
GABAWormunc-25, unc-49, unc-47Synthesis enzyme for GABA (glutamate decarboxylate), GABA receptor, and GABA transporter, respectively. Genes that encode components of GABA signaling become downregulated after alcohol exposure.Microarray400 mM ethanol exposureAcute alcohol exposure increases GABAA receptor activity, resulting in increased neuronal inhibition and sedation. GABA agonist Baclofen has been shown to reduce alcohol consumption and craving and inhibit the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol in mice, while GABAB antagonists facilitate rapid tolerance in a dose-dependent manner.[82,85,86,87,90,176]
Fly GABAA contributes to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. Administration of GABAB agonists decreased sensitivity and increased tolerance, while GABAB antagonists increased alcohol sensitivity.Booz-o-mat: Pharmacological administration followed by measurement of time to sedation60% saturated ethanol vapor; 100% ethanol for 24 min
NMDARFlynmdar1NMDA receptor 1.F654A and K558Q; LOF mutantTwo different point mutations in NMDAR1 showed altered sensitivity to alcohol sedation, while loss of function mutation reduced rapid tolerance.Inebriator; inebriometer100% ethanol heated to 65 °C and a flow of 15 mL/min; 60/40 ethanol vapor/humidified air for 30 minAdministration of NMDAR antagonists has been shown to block the development of rapid tolerance in mammals. Chronic alcohol exposure has been shown to increase the expression of the NMDAR subunits (NR1 and NR2).[93,94,95,99,100]
KCNQFlyKCNQVoltage-gated potassium channel.Null mutant [KCNQ186]Ethanol has been shown to reduce KCNQ current and loss of KCNQ function in Drosophila increases sensitivity and tolerance to the sedative effects of ethanol.Time to sedation [Ethanol pipetted in Kim wipes and placed at the bottom of a fly bottle].40% ethanol for 90 minKCNQ2, KCNQ3, and KCNQ5 have been associated with ethanol consumption and preference in rodents and humans. Administration of potassium channel opener retigabine significantly decreases alcohol drinking in rodents and alleviates alcohol-induced anxiety during withdrawal.[102,103,104,105,106]
BK channelWormslo-1 (slowpoke)Big potassium channel.LOF mutant [slo-1], eg7, eg73, eg24, and eg142; gain of function mutants [ky389gf, ky399gf]BK channel is one of the major targets of alcohol. Loss of function slo-1 mutants were resistant to the effect of ethanol. Ethanol activates the BK channel in vivo, leading to inhibition of neuronal activity, and hyperactivation of the BK channel leads to behavior similar to ethanol intoxication. Ethanol exposure downregulates slo-1 expression.Forward genetics, microarray; locomotor, egg-laying; Electrophysiology (whole-cell current recording-patch clamp).400 mM ethanol exposure for 20 minThe mammalian ortholog of slo-1, KCNMA1, is associated with alcohol dependence in humans and other alcohol-related behaviors like sensitivity in rodents.[42,86,103,110,111,112,114,116]
Flyslo-1 (slowpoke)Big potassium channel.Null mutant [slo4]; ash218 (neuronal deletion of slo)Ethanol increases neuronal slo-1 gene expression, which leads to the development of rapid tolerance, while deletion of slo-1 results in loss of rapid tolerance. Artificial induction of slowpoke makes flies more resistant to the effect of ethanol.Inebriator100% ethanol heated to 65 °C at flow of 15 mL/min
Dlg1Flydiscs large 1 (dlg1)Member of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family of scaffolding proteins.LOF mutants [dlg1]; dlgNP1102, dlgNP768LOF mutants show decreased tolerance to the sedative effects of alcohol.Inebriometer60/40 ethanol vapor/humidified air for 30 minDeletion of SAP97, a mammalian homolog of dlgS97, leads to an inability to develop rapid tolerance to the sedative effects of ethanol in mice.[95]
CASK (Calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine kinase)FlyCASKScaffolding protein (also known as Caki or Camguk).LOF mutant [CASK]; CASKP18, CASKP46LOF mutants of CASK display increased sensitivity and decreased ethanol tolerance.Inebriometer60/40 ethanol vapor/humidified air for 30 min [95]
HomerFlyhomerNeuronal protein that regulates metabotropic glutamate receptor function.null mutant [homerR102]Ethanol exposure decreases the expression of homer mRNA in Drosophila. LOF mutants of homer exhibit increased sensitivity and reduced rapid tolerance to the sedative effect of ethanol.Microarray, ethanol sensitivity, and tolerance assay56% ethanol at a flow of 160 mL/min for 50 min for sedation; 50–70% at a flow of 130 mL/min for 40 min for toleranceAn increase in Homer2 expression has been reported in rodent models of alcohol dependence and withdrawal.[133,134,135]
ShibireFlyshibireEncodes the GTPase dynamin which enables actin-binding activity and synaptic vesicle recyclingTemperature-sensitive mutant allele [shits1, shits2].Temperature-sensitive endogenous mutation in shire prevents the development of tolerance.Inebriator100% ethanol heated to 65 °C at flow of 15 mL/minThe expression of dynamin-1 is significantly changed in the mammalian brain including humans after alcohol consumption.[138,139,140,141,142]
Syntaxin 1AFlysyntaxin 1Apart of the SNARE protein complex and is required for vesicle fusion.Temperature-sensitive mutant allele [Syx1A3−69].The temperature-sensitive mutant allele of syx1A failed to develop rapid tolerance.Inebriator100% ethanol heated to 65 °C at flow of 15 mL/minSyntaxin 12 has also been found to be associated with alcohol preference in mice.[138,150,151]
SynapsinFlysynapsinNeuronal phosphoprotein involved in the regulation of neurotransmitter release.null mutant [SAP97]One study showed that deletion of the Synapsin gene (Syn) enhances rapid tolerance to ethanol without affecting initial sensitivity, while the other showed that the flies are resistant to the effect of ethanol during first exposure and showed reduced tolerance. Exposure to ethanol decreases Syn expression in the brain, and the expression is regulated by ethanol in a Sir2-dependent manner [histone deacetylases].Time to ST50 and tolerance;
Booz-o-mat		50% ethanol vapor in perforated 50mL falcon tube; 85/65 ethanol vapor/air.Ethanol exposure increases the phosphorylation of synapsin in a PKA-dependent manner.[154,155,157]
SEB-3Wormseb-3Encodes a corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor-like GPCR and is involved in stress response.LOF mutant [seb-3 (tm1848)], GOF mutant [eg696]Seb-3 signaling is required for the development of ethanol preference, compulsive ethanol seeking, and tremors during ethanol withdrawal. Loss of function mutants of seb-3 do not develop acute functional tolerance, whereas gain of function mutants show enhanced acute tolerance to ethanol.Rate of locomotion500 mM ethanol exposure for 10, 30, or 50 minStudies have shown that crf1 receptor antagonists attenuate stress-induced increases in ethanol consumption and decrease binge-like ethanol drinking in mice and rats. Chronic consumption of ethanol increases CRF release in the specific areas in the limbic system of alcohol-dependent rats during withdrawal.[159,160,161,162]
GPRK2FlyGPRK2Encodes a member of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase family which modulates GPCR signaling activity.LOF mutant [gprk2KO, gprk2del1]
LOF mutation of Gprk2 reduces rapid tolerance, increases alcohol-induced hyperactivity, and reduces sensitivity to the sedative effects of ethanol.Loss of righting reflex (LORR)EtOH/water vapor (1:1) at a flow rate of 250 mL/minChronic ethanol consumption in rats is associated with an increase in the binding of mu-opioid receptors with G-protein receptor kinase 2 (Grk2) in the hippocampus and is associated with the desensitization of the opioid receptor following chronic consumption. Chronic alcohol consumption increases Grk2 expression in the nucleus accumbens shell to reduce excessive drinking in mice.[164,165,166]
Columns are as follows: names of proteins, which invertebrate model is the evidence from, the gene symbol, a brief description of the function of the gene, the mutant used for the studies, AUD-related phenotypes in the invertebrate model, the assays used, the dose of alcohol used for the studies, the evidence from mammalian studies implicating the gene in some aspect of AUD, and the citations.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bhandari, A.; Seguin, A.; Rothenfluh, A. Synaptic Mechanisms of Ethanol Tolerance and Neuroplasticity: Insights from Invertebrate Models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6838. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136838

AMA Style

Bhandari A, Seguin A, Rothenfluh A. Synaptic Mechanisms of Ethanol Tolerance and Neuroplasticity: Insights from Invertebrate Models. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(13):6838. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136838

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bhandari, Aakriti, Alexandra Seguin, and Adrian Rothenfluh. 2024. "Synaptic Mechanisms of Ethanol Tolerance and Neuroplasticity: Insights from Invertebrate Models" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 13: 6838. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136838

APA Style

Bhandari, A., Seguin, A., & Rothenfluh, A. (2024). Synaptic Mechanisms of Ethanol Tolerance and Neuroplasticity: Insights from Invertebrate Models. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(13), 6838. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136838

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop