Next Article in Journal
Dietary Supplementation with n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Delays the Phenotypic Manifestation of Krabbe Disease and Partially Restores Lipid Mediator Production in the Brain—Study in a Mouse Model of the Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Bioreduction of 4′-Hydroxychalcone in Deep Eutectic Solvents: Optimization and Efficacy with Various Yeast Strains
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Characterization of a Sustained Nitric Oxide-Releasing Orthodontic Elastomeric Chain for Antimicrobial Action
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Antimicrobial Biomaterials: Recent Progress”

by
Helena P. Felgueiras
Centre for Textile Science and Technology (2C2T), University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(13), 7153; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137153
Submission received: 24 June 2024 / Accepted: 28 June 2024 / Published: 28 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Biomaterials: Recent Progress)
Biomaterials have demonstrated their ability to serve as effective drug delivery platforms, enabling targeted and localized administration of therapeutic agents. The development of biomaterial-based drug delivery systems has been particularly beneficial in the management of various medical conditions [1,2]. In the field of cancer treatment, biomaterial-based nanoparticles and liposomes can precisely deliver chemotherapeutic agents to cancerous cells, thus reducing the impact on healthy tissues and minimizing side effects [3]. In the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, biomaterial-coated drug-eluting stents have been shown to release pharmaceutical agents locally, reducing the risk of restenosis [4]. Moreover, biomaterials have played a crucial role in overcoming the blood–brain barrier, allowing for neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s to be treated by target-directed drug delivery vehicles [5]. Biomaterial scaffolds in wound healing have also demonstrated the ability to facilitate cell growth while fighting infections [6,7].
The versatile nature of biomaterials continues to drive advancements in drug delivery, paving the way for more effective and patient-centered healthcare solutions [8,9]. Innovations in nanotechnology and gene therapy, for instance, have further enhanced personalized drug delivery strategies based on individual genetic profiles and disease characteristics [10,11]. Real-time monitoring and feedback systems can be engineered to dynamically adjust drug release rates, ensuring that patients receive precise doses when needed [12].
Biomaterials play a crucial role in the development of implantable devices and drug delivery platforms, significantly impacting patients’ quality of life. The versatility of biomaterials allows for the engineering of a diverse array of devices and scaffolding systems, each tailored to specific patient demands. However, the long-term use of these implantable devices can be threatened by the adhesion and proliferation of microorganisms, leading to the formation of biofilms or fibrotic responses that can become highly cytotoxic and endanger the patients’ quality of life [13]. Pathogenic microorganisms may cause local infection and, consequently, implant failure; further, they can hinder the delivery of therapeutic molecules by specialized delivery platforms, rendering them ineffective. Many alternatives have been proposed over the years to prevent such events, including the use of antiseptics and antibiotics or the physical modification of the biomaterial’s surface, with the incorporation of bioactive agents of interest. From specialized polymers and functional groups to silver and, more recently, antimicrobial peptides and natural extracts, different functionalization/modification techniques have been employed in this fight against pathogenic invaders [8,14]. In fact, the interest in the loading of natural and synthetic antimicrobial agents into different inorganic, lipid, and polymeric-based nanomaterials has been reignited [15]. Not only that, but patients with specific infections, such as ventriculostomy-induced infections, have benefitted from the impregnation and decoration of biomaterials with antimicrobial agents [16]. Silver–porous aluminum oxide nanocomposites, for instance can be synthesized using microwave irradiation. The microwave treatment helps incorporate the silver nanoparticles into the porous alumina matrix, creating stable heterojunctions with improved antiseptic and bactericidal properties [17]. Additionally, antibiotics combined with nanomaterials have been shown to surpass the problems with multi-drug resistance, turning obsolete antibiotic-based therapies into new and relevant approaches for fighting infections [18]. In another strategy, a low-temperature atmospheric argon plasma brush combined with antibiotic-like agents was used for oral bacterial deactivation [19]. More recently, antimicrobial peptide-based hydrogels were explored as alternative agents, as they are increasingly examined for their potent antimicrobial properties and practical applications, such as in wound healing [20].
The emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis is a significant global health issue, with Mycobacterium tuberculosis being responsible for drug-resistant cases. Effective detection of this bacterium is a great challenge. Researchers have engineered super-selective primer-based real-time PCR assays, through which efficient diagnoses of hetero-resistant tuberculosis in clinical specimens can be accomplished, while contributing to the understanding of the bacterium’s drug resistance mechanisms [21]. The challenge to discover new antimycobacterial agents against this bacterium has forced researchers to explore new classes of antimicrobial compounds, including repurposed drugs like gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, and various natural compounds with anti-tuberculosis properties [22]. Aside from this, other infections have been the target of research for new antimicrobial formulations, some of which are engineered from natural resources, such as quaternized soy protein isolates, which have shown significant antibacterial properties and superior water solubility [23]. Biosynthesized silver chloride nanoparticles from the leaf extract of Carduus crispus have also been examined for their antibacterial efficacy, showing great potency against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [24].
In the food industry, the preservation of fruits and vegetables to prevent propagation of infections is a great challenge. However, some advances are being made, namely the application of compounds based on chitosan, phosphoric acid plus micronutrients, and sweet orange essential oil to coat the aliments and reduce decay. These coatings increase the antioxidant and flavonoid content at harvest and reduce the use of chemical–synthetic fungicides used for preservation [25]. Chitosan beads immobilized with cellobiose dehydrogenase have also been proposed for packaging in the food industry to improve antioxidant, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic properties [26]. Likewise, chitosan can be used for nanoencapsulation of different antimicrobial agents to improve the biological activity of packaging materials against various pathogens [27].

Funding

This work was funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Competitiveness Program and the Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal (FCT) under the projects UID/CTM/00264/2020 of Centre for Textile Science and Technology (2C2T) on its components base (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00264/2020) and programmatic (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/00264/2020). H.P.F. also acknowledges FCT for the auxiliary researcher contract 2021.02720.CEEIND (https://doi.org/10.54499/DL57/2016/CP1377/CT0098).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Felgueiras, H.P. Emerging antimicrobial and immunomodulatory fiber-based scaffolding systems for treating diabetic foot ulcers. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Su, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; An, Y.; Shi, L. Recent advances and future prospects on adaptive biomaterials for antimicrobial applications. Macromol. Biosci. 2019, 19, 1900289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pawar, V.; Maske, P.; Khan, A.; Ghosh, A.; Keshari, R.; Bhatt, M.; Srivastava, R. Responsive Nanostructure for Targeted Drug Delivery. J. Nanotheranostics 2023, 4, 55–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Udriște, A.S.; Burdușel, A.C.; Niculescu, A.G.; Rădulescu, M.; Grumezescu, A.M. Coatings for Cardiovascular Stents-An Up-to-Date Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Trucillo, P. Biomaterials for Drug Delivery and Human Applications. Materials 2024, 17, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Teixeira, M.A.; Antunes, J.C.; Seabra, C.L.; Tohidi, S.D.; Reis, S.; Amorim, M.T.P.; Felgueiras, H.P. Tiger 17 and pexiganan as antimicrobial and hemostatic boosters of cellulose acetate-containing poly (vinyl alcohol) electrospun mats for potential wound care purposes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 209, 1526–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liang, Y.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Guo, B. Antibacterial biomaterials for skin wound dressing. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 17, 353–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Felgueiras, H.P.; Homem, N.C.; Teixeira, M.; Ribeiro, A.; Teixeira, M.O.; Antunes, J.; Amorim, M. Biodegradable wet-spun fibers modified with antimicrobial agents for potential applications in biomedical engineering. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1765, 012007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pei, J.; Yan, Y.; Palanisamy, C.P.; Jayaraman, S.; Natarajan, P.M.; Umapathy, V.R.; Gopathy, S.; Roy, J.R.; Sadagopan, J.C.; Thalamati, D. Materials-based drug delivery approaches: Recent advances and future perspectives. Green Process. Synth. 2024, 13, 20230094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mirza, Z.; Karim, S. Nanoparticles-based drug delivery and gene therapy for breast cancer: Recent advancements and future challenges. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2021, 69, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Matteis, L.; Martín-Rapún, R.; de la Fuente, J.M. Nanotechnology in personalized medicine: A promising tool for alzheimer’s disease treatment. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018, 25, 4602–4615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Awwad, S.; Ibeanu, N.; Liu, T.; Velentza-Almpani, A.; Chouhan, N.; Vlatakis, S.; Khaw, P.T.; Brocchini, S.; Bouremel, Y. Real-Time Monitoring Platform for Ocular Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Khatoon, Z.; McTiernan, C.D.; Suuronen, E.J.; Mah, T.F.; Alarcon, E.I. Bacterial biofilm formation on implantable devices and approaches to its treatment and prevention. Heliyon 2018, 4, e01067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tavares, T.D.; Antunes, J.C.; Padrão, J.; Ribeiro, A.I.; Zille, A.; Amorim, M.T.P.; Ferreira, F.; Felgueiras, H.P. Activity of specialized biomolecules against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mercan, D.-A.; Niculescu, A.-G.; Grumezescu, A.M. Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Agents Delivery—An Up-to-Date Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Diop, S.; Roujansky, A.; Kallel, H.; Mounier, R. Prevention of Ventriculostomy Related Infection: Effectiveness of Impregnated Biomaterial. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bahadur, N.M.; Furusawa, T.; Sato, M.; Kurayama, F.; Siddiquey, I.A.; Suzuki, N. Fast and facile synthesis of silica coated silver nanoparticles by microwave irradiation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 355, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Adeniji, O.O.; Nontongana, N.; Okoh, J.C.; Okoh, A.I. The Potential of Antibiotics and Nanomaterial Combinations as Therapeutic Strategies in the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Infections: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Malcangi, G.; Patano, A.; Trilli, I.; Piras, F.; Ciocia, A.M.; Inchingolo, A.D.; Mancini, A.; Hazballa, D.; Di Venere, D.; Inchingolo, F.; et al. Therapeutic and Adverse Effects of Lasers in Dentistry: A Systematic Review. Photonics 2023, 10, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Copling, A.; Akantibila, M.; Kumaresan, R.; Fleischer, G.; Cortes, D.; Tripathi, R.S.; Carabetta, V.J.; Vega, S.L. Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Peptide Hydrogels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Günther, G.; Ruswa, N.; Keller, P.M. Drug-resistant tuberculosis: Advances in diagnosis and management. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2022, 28, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shehzad, A.; Rehman, G.; Ul-Islam, M.; Khattak, W.A.; Lee, Y.S. Challenges in the development of drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 17, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rani, S.; Kumar, R. A review on material and antimicrobial properties of soy protein isolate film. J. Polym. Environ. 2019, 27, 1613–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Urnukhsaikhan, E.; Bold, B.-E.; Gunbileg, A.; Sukhbaatar, N.; Mishig-Ochir, T. Antibacterial activity and characteristics of silver nanoparticles biosynthesized from Carduus crispus. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Duda-Chodak, A.; Tarko, T.; Petka-Poniatowska, K. Antimicrobial Compounds in Food Packaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Malhotra, B.; Keshwani, A.; Kharkwal, H. Antimicrobial food packaging: Potential and pitfalls. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Flórez, M.; Guerra-Rodríguez, E.; Cazón, P.; Vázquez, M. Chitosan for food packaging: Recent advances in active and intelligent films. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Felgueiras, H.P. Special Issue “Antimicrobial Biomaterials: Recent Progress”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137153

AMA Style

Felgueiras HP. Special Issue “Antimicrobial Biomaterials: Recent Progress”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(13):7153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Felgueiras, Helena P. 2024. "Special Issue “Antimicrobial Biomaterials: Recent Progress”" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 13: 7153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137153

APA Style

Felgueiras, H. P. (2024). Special Issue “Antimicrobial Biomaterials: Recent Progress”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(13), 7153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop