Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Analysis of the Auxin/Indoleacetic Acid (Aux/IAA) Gene Family in Autopolyploid Sugarcane (Saccharum spontaneum)
Previous Article in Journal
The Degradation of Botulinum Neurotoxin Light Chains Using PROTACs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (HyperCEST) Molecular Imaging: Achievements and Future Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Applications of SPECT and PET Imaging for the Physiological Evaluation of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

by
Eleanor T. Rimmerman
1,2 and
Mitchel R. Stacy
1,2,3,*
1
Interdisciplinary Biophysics Graduate Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
2
Center for Regenerative Medicine, Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43215, USA
3
Division of Vascular Diseases and Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(13), 7474; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137474
Submission received: 6 June 2024 / Revised: 1 July 2024 / Accepted: 4 July 2024 / Published: 8 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Probe: Recent Research and Future Challenges)

Abstract

:
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is classified as the narrowing or complete occlusion of the lower extremity arteries due to atherosclerosis. The risk of developing PAD increases with increased age and risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Current treatment for PAD involves lifestyle and symptom management, statin and antiplatelet therapy, and/or surgical interventions to improve quality of life with varying efficacy. PAD affects approximately 5 to 6 percent of the global population, with this global burden continuing to increase. Despite the increase in disease prevalence, no gold standard functional diagnostic tool has been established for enabling early detection of the disease, appropriate medical management, and prediction of adverse outcomes for PAD patients. The visualization and quantification of the physiological consequences of PAD are possible by way of nuclear imaging: specifically, via scintigraphy, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. These non-invasive modalities, when combined with targeted radionuclides, possess utility for detecting functional perfusion deficits and provide unique insight into muscle tissue- and vascular-level characteristics of PAD patients. This review discusses the past, present, and emerging applications of hybrid nuclear imaging modalities in the evaluation and monitoring of patients with PAD.

1. Introduction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive atherosclerotic disorder characterized by arterial stenosis and plaque deposition in the lower extremities. Left untreated or poorly managed, PAD can lead to lower extremity claudication, non-healing ulcers of the ankles and feet, gangrene, amputation, cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, and death [1]. First-line treatment involves lifestyle modifications (diet, smoking cessation [2], and high-intensity exercise [3]) in combination with statin and antiplatelet therapy aimed at stabilizing atherosclerotic plaques, lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and improving symptoms [4]. More aggressive methods include invasive surgical interventions such as endovascular procedures (balloon angioplasty, stenting) or bypass grafting [5]. Despite these treatment efforts, the global incidence of peripheral artery disease has increased from approximately 65.8 million in 1990 to 113 million in 2019 [6]. Current screening tools commonly focus on identifying lower extremity PAD through the assessment of hemodynamics (e.g., ankle-brachial index, toe-brachial index) or vascular anatomy (e.g., ultrasound, angiography). Therefore, additional development of non-invasive diagnostic approaches that allow for combined monitoring of both functional and anatomical consequences of PAD could potentially improve the standard of care for disease detection, management, and monitoring.
Since the early 1970s, nuclear medicine strategies have evolved for evaluating cardiovascular diseases, with primary efforts focusing on the assessment of myocardial perfusion deficits in patients with coronary artery disease [7]. However, in recent decades, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), when partnered with targeted radionuclides, have become increasingly recognized as non-invasive imaging approaches that may also identify abnormalities in lower extremity skeletal muscle perfusion, localized regions of soft tissue and bone infection, and peripheral atherosclerosis in patients with PAD (Table 1).
This review briefly discusses the history of non-invasive assessment of clinical PAD with nuclear imaging techniques, highlights emerging developments and applications of SPECT and PET imaging in patients with PAD, and discusses potential future directions and roles of nuclear imaging in the early detection and management of PAD.

2. SPECT/CT Imaging

In the 1940s, the first nuclear medicine investigations to evaluate lower extremity blood flow in patients with PAD used a Geiger meter to track dynamic changes in radioactive counts following the administration of radioisotopes [52,53]. The creation and evolution of non-invasive nuclear cardiology then subsequently led to the application of two-dimensional scintigraphy in PAD patients for the analysis of limb perfusion [8,10,54]. However, it was not until 1989 that SPECT imaging was first utilized for the three-dimensional (3D) assessment of relative perfusion in PAD patients [10]. Thallium-201 (201Tl) became the first radionuclide of choice for early SPECT imaging investigations focused on evaluating perfusion in PAD, with these studies demonstrating the ability to non-invasively detect perfusion deficits in the anterior and posterior compartments of the lower extremities [10]. However, relative limitations of 201Tl, including a 73 h half-life and a relatively low energy emission of 78 keV for gamma imaging, led to the utilization of radionuclides that possessed more favorable imaging attributes [1]. Most notably, from the 1990s onward, technetium-99m (99mTc)-labeled radionuclides, including 99mTc-sestamibi and 99mTc-tetrofosmin, became the most widely used for SPECT imaging investigations in clinical PAD due to their more favorable gamma imaging properties (i.e., 6 h half-life and 140 keV emission of 99mTc), which reduced the amount of ionizing radiation for patients while simultaneously improving image quality.

2.1. Skeletal Muscle Perfusion

In recent years, hybrid SPECT/CT imaging with 99mTc-tetrofosmin has become increasingly utilized for evaluating regional abnormalities in skeletal muscle perfusion in patients with PAD. A 2018 study by Alvelo et al. [9] evaluated the utility of SPECT/CT imaging for quantifying abnormalities in resting perfusion within 3D vascular runoff territories (i.e., angiosomes) of the foot in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). This work demonstrated that SPECT/CT imaging detected significantly lower relative perfusion in the feet of CLTI patients when compared to healthy control subjects [9]. Additionally, this study revealed a mismatch between perfusion values derived from SPECT/CT imaging and the ankle-brachial index, which is a traditional hemodynamic screening test in patients with PAD. These data suggested that SPECT/CT imaging may provide additive assessment of microvascular perfusion in patients with PAD beyond that afforded by conventional PAD screening techniques [9]. Subsequent work from the same research team further demonstrated that 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT imaging can be used to quantify serial improvements in regional foot perfusion following lower extremity revascularization in CLTI patients [13], and these SPECT imaging-derived changes in foot perfusion are associated with amputation outcomes in the first 3 and 12 months post-intervention (Figure 1) [15].
Along with evaluating regional foot perfusion and risk for limb loss after peripheral interventions, 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT imaging of calf muscle perfusion has also been performed in patients with PAD and demonstrated prognostic value for predicting adverse events. Specifically, Hashimoto et al. [14] utilized SPECT/CT imaging to quantify a lower extremity muscle-to-background ratio (LMBR) as an index of calf muscle perfusion. Patients were then assigned to low and high LMBR perfusion groups, which revealed that a significantly higher number of patients with low calf perfusion experienced major adverse events compared to their high calf perfusion group counterparts.
In addition to characterizing perfusion abnormalities alone, hybrid SPECT/CT imaging has recently demonstrated utility for simultaneously quantifying peripheral artery calcification in patients with PAD during the same imaging session through the use of co-registered CT images. For example, a recent case report using 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT imaging in a patient with CLTI and gangrene demonstrated the feasibility of non-invasively detecting local deficits in foot perfusion (via SPECT imaging) while also quantifying peripheral artery calcium burden (via CT imaging). SPECT imaging revealed regions of decreased perfusion at the gangrenous first and second digits as well as at the level of the transmetatarsals, while CT imaging allowed for complementary quantification of peripheral artery calcification in the posterior tibial, peroneal, and anterior tibial arteries. The patient subsequently underwent a transmetatarsal amputation 3 months later that closely aligned with the previously identified anatomical level of perfusion deficit that was identified on SPECT/CT perfusion imaging, suggesting a potential role of nuclear perfusion imaging in detecting viable versus non-viable ischemic tissue and guiding clinicians with amputation/surgical planning [16].

2.2. Lower Extremity Osteomyelitis and Infection

PAD patients who present with foot ulcerations, generally due to underlying diabetes mellitus and poor wound healing secondary to arterial insufficiency (ankle brachial index <0.9), may develop soft tissue infections. These infections, if poorly managed, may progress to osteomyelitis, or infection of the underlying bone. Several 99mTc- and gallium-67 (67Ga)-based radionuclides have demonstrated utility for targeting and identifying osteomyelitis and tissue infections, which can be critical for reducing adverse events such as amputations by characterizing regions of soft tissue hyperemia and inflammation [55]. These features can be sensitively and specifically identified using radionuclides either alone (67Ga) or labeled with inflammatory markers (e.g., 99mTc- or indium-111-labeled white blood cells, WBCs) to accurately identify and differentiate inflammatory from infectious regions of the lower extremities to assist with guiding the medical management of patients at high risk of limb loss [17,56].
Early applications of 99mTc radionuclides for diagnosing PAD-associated osteomyelitis involved two-dimensional imaging with bone scintigraphy; however, the poor specificity and low spatial resolution of scintigraphy proved difficult when differentiating regions of soft tissue versus bone infection [18]. Therefore, 3D SPECT imaging has more recently emerged to overcome the spatial resolution constraints of scintigraphy. Studies comparing the accuracy of SPECT versus scintigraphy for diagnosing osteomyelitis have consistently demonstrated superior capabilities of SPECT imaging. For example, a 2010 study by Heiba et al. [19] evaluated suspected diabetic foot infections using a combined 99mTc hydroxymethlene-diphosphonate (99mTc-HDP) bone scintigraphy and indium-111 (111In)-WBC dual-isotope imaging approach and then compared the diagnostic confidence/lesion site detection results of dual-isotope scintigraphic imaging to dual-isotope imaging with SPECT/CT using the same radionuclides. The results of this study revealed that dual-isotope SPECT/CT imaging was the most accurate approach that provided improved detection and discrimination of soft tissue infection and osteomyelitis. Another study by Horger et al. [20] evaluated the use and diagnostic performance of 99mTc-labeled anti-granulocyte antibodies (99mTc-AGA) with two-dimensional scintigraphy versus 3D hybrid SPECT/CT imaging, which demonstrated that hybrid imaging with SPECT/CT improved specificity (89%) compared to scintigraphy (78%) and also reduced the number of false positive results. These studies using 99mTc-labeled tracers highlight the diagnostic abilities and emergence of hybrid imaging modalities for determining the precise anatomical location of osteomyelitis and discriminating osteomyelitis from soft tissue infections in patients with diabetes and PAD.
In addition to 99mTc-labeled imaging approaches, 67Ga citrate has been utilized for diagnosing osteomyelitis and differentiating it from non-specific tissue inflammation, though its applications have been more limited than 99mTc. 67Ga has also demonstrated lower diagnostic accuracy compared to 99mTc- and 111In-labeled tracers traditionally used for scintigraphic or SPECT imaging [21]. To overcome this limitation, 67Ga citrate has been previously investigated in conjunction with 111In-WBC during scintigraphy and SPECT/CT imaging studies to assess and compare the diagnostic capabilities of these methods for identifying infection [23]. A study by Bar-Shalom et al. [23] found that dual-isotope imaging with SPECT/CT more accurately diagnosed and localized the site of infection and osteomyelitis compared to scintigraphy. Along with using 67Ga-citrate for localizing and diagnosing lower extremity osteomyelitis, prior studies have also investigated the utility of 67Ga-citrate SPECT/CT imaging for guiding osteomyelitis treatment. A 2013 study by Aslangul et al. [24] specifically coupled 67Ga SPECT/CT imaging with percutaneous bone puncture to assist in guiding antibiotic treatment for patients diagnosed with osteomyelitis. This study demonstrated that a combined imaging and bone puncture approach possessed a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 93.6% for detecting osteomyelitis and subsequently determined that 55% of clinical cases with suspected osteomyelitis did not ultimately necessitate antibiotic treatment [24]. Taken together, hybrid SPECT/CT imaging studies performed in patients with PAD and lower extremity infection have demonstrated potential utility for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis as well as determining appropriate medical management.

3. PET/CT Imaging

Although PET scanners are less commonly available and associated with higher relative costs compared to SPECT due to the need for more specialized and expensive radioisotope production facilities (i.e., cyclotrons) and radiochemistry staff, PET imaging generally provides higher sensitivity count detection, improved spatial and temporal resolution imaging, lower levels of ionizing radiation, and accurate quantification of radionuclide uptake in tissues of interest when compared to SPECT imaging [1,12]. PET imaging also allows for the quantitative assessment of a multitude of physiological parameters (e.g., absolute measures of skeletal muscle perfusion and metabolism, peripheral atherosclerosis) that are potentially advantageous in the screening for and diagnosis of lower extremity PAD. The following section highlights the recent developments and applications of PET imaging in the evaluation of patients with PAD.

3.1. Skeletal Muscle Perfusion

The first PET-focused investigations of PAD patients in the 1980s by Depairon and colleagues revealed the potential of PET imaging for evaluating skeletal muscle perfusion deficits by demonstrating asymmetrical blood flow and oxygen utilization patterns in the lower extremities of patients with PAD at rest and in response to exercise stress [29,30]. Additional work from the same laboratory later revealed that PET perfusion imaging in PAD patients with bolused H215O and 15O2 allowed for broad physiological assessment of both calf muscle blood flow and oxygen utilization and showed that these PET-derived measures were similar to measures acquired with venous occlusion plethysmography [27]. It was not until 1997 that Burchert and colleagues demonstrated the successful use of 15O-water PET imaging to quantify absolute measures of skeletal muscle perfusion in the calf muscles of patients with PAD under various physiological conditions (i.e., rest, exercise stress, pharmacological stress) [28]. More recent work in the 2000s has since demonstrated that PET perfusion measures are also closely correlated with blood flow measures obtained from thermodilution techniques [31] and possess similar diagnostic capabilities as laser Doppler imaging and transcutaneous oxygen pressure in the non-invasive evaluation of calf muscle ischemia in patients with PAD [25]. The test-retest repeatability of 15O-water PET/CT imaging was also recently evaluated in healthy subjects in 2024 by Christensen et al. [26], who revealed good repeatability of the method for quantifying skeletal muscle perfusion in various regions of the lower extremities (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.88 for the calf and 0.87 for the feet).
While traditional PET perfusion radionuclides, such as 15O-water, have commonly been used for quantifying skeletal muscle perfusion in the lower extremities, recent research has revealed that 18-fluorine (18F)-labeled radionuclides may also possess utility for quantifying skeletal muscle perfusion in the setting of PAD. For example, a 2024 translational study by Chou et al. [47] tested the feasibility of using dynamic PET imaging with 18-fluorine sodium fluoride (18F-NaF), a radionuclide traditionally used for quantifying bone perfusion, for quantifying absolute measures of skeletal muscle perfusion in PAD. This dynamic PET imaging approach was first tested and validated in a porcine model of hindlimb ischemia and then translated to patients with varying stages of PAD-related ischemic symptoms. The team further applied the method to a clinical case of peripheral revascularization to assess the feasibility of using this PET imaging approach to quantify perfusion responses to interventions. The study demonstrated that PET-derived measures of perfusion obtained for individual calf muscles were significantly associated with the degree of PAD-related calf symptoms and revealed that PET imaging was capable of quantifying regional perfusion responses to endovascular revascularization in the calf. Thus, this recent work suggests that dynamic PET imaging with commercially available, longer-half-life 18F-labeled radionuclides may provide a novel approach for quantifying skeletal muscle perfusion without the need for traditional PET perfusion radioisotopes that possess relatively short half-lives and require more costly on-site production using cyclotrons or generators.

3.2. Skeletal Muscle Metabolism and Peripheral Atherosclerosis

In addition to allowing for the investigation of skeletal muscle perfusion in PAD, PET imaging has been applied in recent years to non-invasively quantify ischemia-induced alterations in skeletal muscle metabolism as well as atherosclerotic disease progression associated with PAD. While still relatively understudied in the setting of PAD, PET imaging of skeletal muscle metabolism with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), a radiolabeled glucose analog, has demonstrated potential for detecting regional changes in calf muscle metabolism in patients with PAD in a single clinical study [57], thus suggesting that this approach may provide insight into the functional consequences associated with chronic muscle ischemia.
In the assessment of peripheral atherosclerosis, prior studies also utilized 18F-FDG as a non-invasive biomarker of atherosclerosis-induced arterial inflammation due to the presence and activation of metabolically active macrophages residing in atherosclerotic plaques that may have an affinity for glucose/18F-FDG [35]. In early clinical studies investigating the utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging as an indicator of peripheral artery inflammation, Yun et al. [36] demonstrated that arterial retention of 18F-FDG was significantly correlated with age. Subsequent work by others similarly confirmed a positive and significant relationship between peripheral artery 18F-FDG uptake and patient age [37,38,39]. In addition to aging increasing PET-detectable arterial inflammation, prior studies also revealed higher peripheral artery uptake of 18F-FDG on PET images in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors [40], diabetes mellitus-induced arterial stiffness [41], and tobacco use [42]. Aside from correlating strongly with patient-level factors, 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging has demonstrated potential as a non-invasive approach for monitoring response to vascular therapies in patients with PAD. Specifically, a 2010 study by Ishii et al. [43] revealed significant reductions in arterial uptake of 18F-FDG in response to statin therapy, while a more recent 2021 study by Jiang et al. [33] found that 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was useful for tracking the efficacy of sonodynamic therapy by quantifying serial reductions in arterial inflammation in patients with PAD.
Aside from 18F-FDG, the utility of 18F-NaF as a radionuclide for atherosclerosis-targeted PET/CT imaging in lower extremity PAD has been investigated due to its high affinity for hydroxyapatite, which enables the detection of the active process of vascular microcalcification prior to the development of CT-detectable arterial calcification [58]. 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging has been shown to be a feasible approach for investigating atherosclerosis in the lower extremities [48] and has demonstrated a significant association between femoral artery retention of 18F-NaF and cardiovascular risk factor profiles of patients with PAD [49,50]. More recent work by Chou et al. [46], who performed vessel-by-vessel analysis of 18F-NaF retention on PET/CT images for five major arteries of the lower extremities in patients with PAD, further confirmed that patient-level factors, including the presence of diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease, were significantly associated with increasing levels of 18F-NaF retention (i.e., active arterial microcalcification) (Figure 2). Importantly, this study also demonstrated that arterial retention of 18F-NaF was not significantly associated with CT-detectable calcium burden, thereby indicating that 18F-NaF PET/CT indeed detects and differentiates the active process of microcalcification from the established form of vascular calcium in PAD patients. In a follow-up case report by Chou and colleagues [45], 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging also revealed potential for predicting the formation and expansion of arterial calcification in multiple lower extremity atherosclerotic lesions in a patient with CLTI, with arterial regions showing elevated 18F-NaF at the time of baseline PET/CT imaging subsequently demonstrating increased levels of CT-detectable calcium 18 months later for the same anatomically matched lesion sites. Thus, while still relatively limited in its application to PAD, 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging has shown significant potential in the detection and prediction of atherosclerotic progression in the lower extremities of PAD patients and may therefore represent a non-invasive paradigm for monitoring emerging anti-atherogenic therapies for PAD.

4. Future Directions and Conclusions

Angiogenesis

Molecular imaging of angiogenesis, or the formation of new microvasculature, is an emerging topic in the field of PAD that has been explored in the context of chronic ischemic skeletal muscle; however, to date, research involving the use of PET/CT imaging to non-invasively assess the angiogenic process associated with chronic limb ischemia has remained exploratory and pre-clinical in nature. Although there are a multitude of angiogenic mediators that could be targeted for the imaging of angiogenesis, the primary targets that have been utilized to date for pre-clinical PET imaging investigations have been vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the αvβ3 integrin due to their critical roles in endothelial cell migration and survival [59]. Willmann et al. [60] were one of the first to investigate the utility of copper-64 (64Cu)-labeled VEGF121 (64Cu-DOTA-VEGF121) for detecting the angiogenic response to hindlimb ischemia in a rodent model. This initial research work revealed that a peak angiogenic response to limb ischemia was detectable by microPET imaging approximately 1 week after femoral artery occlusion and further demonstrated that the implementation of an exercise training program in rodents significantly increased PET-detectable angiogenesis within ischemic hindlimbs. Additional PET imaging investigations focused on targeting the αvβ3 integrin have traditionally accomplished this feat via radiolabeling of the cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) peptide, which has been shown to possess a high affinity for the αvβ3 integrin [59]. Examples of such PET radionuclides that have been developed in the last 15 years using the RGD peptide are 68Ga-NOTA-RGD [61] and 64Cu-NOTA-PEG4-cRGD2 [62], with the latter demonstrating potential for non-invasively tracking therapeutic responses to stem cell therapy in a rodent model of hindlimb ischemia. Along with PET imaging of VEGF and αvβ3 integrins, Orbay et al. [63] demonstrated the utility of targeting CD105 (i.e., endoglin), which is an overexpressed protein on newly formed blood vessels, through the use of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 microPET imaging. Their initial investigation using this radionuclide revealed that serial microPET imaging in a mouse model of hindlimb ischemia detected a peak angiogenic response to femoral artery occlusion at 3 days post-occlusion. Later work from the same research team using 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 also demonstrated that microPET imaging was capable of detecting angiogenic responses to pravastatin administration in a rodent model of hindlimb ischemia [64]. Compared to perfusion- and atherosclerosis-targeted imaging studies in PAD, non-invasive monitoring of angiogenesis has remained pre-clinical in nature and relatively understudied. However, continued development of angiogenesis-targeted PET radionuclides may provide a novel platform and offer valuable insight into therapeutic responses for emerging treatments and regenerative medicine approaches in PAD patients in the future.
Non-invasive imaging of PAD is increasingly moving towards hybrid imaging modalities that simultaneously allow for the assessment of the functional and structural consequences of this disease, which may enhance the future detection of and risk stratification for PAD, improve the identification of physiological processes associated with therapeutic efficacy, and open the door for guiding personalized medicine in this clinical population. In recent years, there has been a surge of artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis and predictive modeling techniques utilized for patients with PAD [65] that may offer continued opportunities for research endeavors given the emerging role of predictive modeling in coronary artery disease (CAD) within the past decade [66]. From an image analysis standpoint, deep learning has recently been applied in clinical PAD datasets to automate the analysis of relevant imaging data, including Doppler ultrasound waveforms [67], CT angiography images [68], and magnetic resonance perfusion images acquired in PAD patients [69], and i5 has consistently demonstrated the ability to accelerate the processing and interpretation of clinical images. Additionally, in recent years, models such as random forest models have shown excellent sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing PAD based on common PAD-associated comorbidities [70,71]. Additional recent proof-of-concept work in PAD using a long short-term memory network in combination with logistic regression and support vector machines has similarly demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of PAD based on features extracted from peripheral artery Doppler waveforms [72]. Future application of machine learning models to nuclear medicine may allow for automated regional analysis of peripheral skeletal muscle for perfusion analysis and/or lesion- or vessel-based analysis of atherosclerosis, which could provide efficient detection and quantification of PAD pathophysiology, thereby expediting the diagnosis, determination of disease severity, and implementation of appropriate patient-specific interventions or therapies. While the applications of nuclear imaging have traditionally been limited in PAD, emerging clinical studies continue to reveal the potential role of nuclear medicine techniques for improving our understanding of PAD pathophysiology and creating future opportunities for the early detection and serial monitoring of PAD patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, E.T.R.; writing—review and editing, E.T.R. and M.R.S.; supervision, M.R.S.; project administration, M.R.S.; funding acquisition, M.R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number NIH R01 HL135103 (M.R. Stacy). This content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Chou, T.H.; Stacy, M.R. Clinical Applications for Radiotracer Imaging of Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2020, 22, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yuan, S.; Bruzelius, M.; Damrauer, S.M.; Håkansson, N.; Wolk, A.; Åkesson, A.; Larsson, S.C. Anti-Inflammatory Diet and Incident Peripheral Artery Disease: Two Prospective Cohort Studies. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 41, 1191–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McDermott, M.M.; Spring, B.; Tian, L.; Treat-Jacobson, D.; Ferrucci, L.; Lloyd-Jones, D.; Zhao, L.; Polonsky, T.; Kibbe, M.R.; Bazzano, L.; et al. Effect of Low-Intensity vs High-Intensity Home-Based Walking Exercise on Walk Distance in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: The LITE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021, 325, 1266–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tern, P.J.W.; Kujawiak, I.; Saha, P.; Berrett, T.B.; Chowdhury, M.M.; Coughlin, P.A. Site and Burden of Lower Limb Atherosclerosis Predicts Long-Term Mortality in a Cohort of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2018, 56, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rooke, T.W.; Hirsch, A.T.; Misra, S.; Sidawy, A.N.; Beckman, J.A.; Findeiss, L.K.; Golzarian, J.; Gornik, H.L.; Halperin, J.L.; Jaff, M.R.; et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease (Updating the 2005 Guideline). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58, 2020–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Global Burden of Peripheral Artery Disease and Its Risk Factors, 1990-2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Glob. Health 2023, 11, e1553–e1565. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cannon, P.J.; Dell, R.B.; Dwyer, E.M. Regional Myocardial Perfusion Rates in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. J. Clin. Investig. 1972, 51, 978–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hamanaka, D.; Odori, T.; Maeda, H.; Ishii, Y.; Hayakawa, K.; Torizuka, K. A Quantitative Assessment of Scintigraphy of the Legs Using 201Tl. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1984, 9, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Alvelo, J.L.; Papademetris, X.; Mena-Hurtado, C.; Jeon, S.; Sumpio, B.E.; Sinusas, A.J.; Stacy, M.R. Radiotracer Imaging Allows for Noninvasive Detection and Quantification of Abnormalities in Angiosome Foot Perfusion in Diabetic Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia and Nonhealing Wounds. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2018, 11, e006932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oshima, M.; Akanabe, H.; Sakuma, S.; Yano, T.; Nishikimi, N.; Shionoya, S. Quantification of Leg Muscle Perfusion Using Thallium-201 Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography. J. Nucl. Med. 1989, 30, 458–465. [Google Scholar]
  11. Boschi, A.; Uccelli, L.; Marvelli, L.; Cittanti, C.; Giganti, M.; Martini, P. Technetium-99m Radiopharmaceuticals for Ideal Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Lost and Found Opportunities. Molecules 2022, 27, 1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stacy, M.R.; Sinusas, A.J. Novel Applications of Radionuclide Imaging in Peripheral Vascular Disease. Cardiol. Clin. 2016, 34, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chou, T.H.; Atway, S.A.; Bobbey, A.J.; Sarac, T.P.; Go, M.R.; Stacy, M.R. SPECT/CT Imaging: A Noninvasive Approach for Evaluating Serial Changes in Angiosome Foot Perfusion in Critical Limb Ischemia. Adv. Wound Care 2020, 9, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hashimoto, H.; Fukushima, Y.; Kumita, S.-I.; Miyamoto, M.; Takagi, G.; Yamazaki, J.; Ikeda, T. Prognostic Value of Lower Limb Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Computed Tomography in Patients with Lower Limb Atherosclerotic Peripheral Artery Disease. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2017, 35, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chou, T.H.; Alvelo, J.L.; Janse, S.; Papademetris, X.; Sumpio, B.E.; Mena-Hurtado, C.; Sinusas, A.J.; Stacy, M.R. Prognostic Value of Radiotracer-Based Perfusion Imaging in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 14, 1614–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chou, T.H.; Tram, N.K.; Eisert, S.N.; Bobbey, A.J.; Atway, S.A.; Go, M.R.; Stacy, M.R. Dual Assessment of Abnormal Microvascular Foot Perfusion and Lower Extremity Calcium Burden in a Patient with Critical Limb Ischemia Using Hybrid SPECT/CT Imaging. Vasc. Med. 2021, 26, 225–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Palestro, C.J.; Love, C.; Bhargava, K.K. Labeled Leukocyte Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2009, 53, 105–123. [Google Scholar]
  18. Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Uçkay, I.; Lipsky, B.A. Challenges in Diagnosing Infection in the Diabetic Foot. Diabet. Med. 2015, 32, 748–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Heiba, S.I.; Kolker, D.; Mocherla, B.; Kapoor, K.; Jiang, M.; Son, H.; Rangaswamy, B.; Kostakoglu, L.; Savitch, I.; DaCosta, M.; et al. The Optimized Evaluation of Diabetic Foot Infection by Dual Isotope SPECT/CT Imaging Protocol. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2010, 49, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Horger, M.; Eschmann, S.M.; Pfannenberg, C.; Storek, D.; Dammann, F.; Vonthein, R.; Claussen, C.D.; Bares, R. The Value of SPET/CT in Chronic Osteomyelitis. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2003, 30, 1665–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Johnson, J.E.; Kennedy, E.J.; Shereff, M.J.; Patel, N.C.; Collier, B.D. Prospective Study of Bone, Indium-111-Labeled White Blood Cell, and Gallium-67 Scanning for the Evaluation of Osteomyelitis in the Diabetic Foot. Foot Ankle Int. 1996, 17, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ando, A.; Nitta, K.; Ando, I.; Sanada, S.; Katsuda, S.; Tonami, N.; Hiraki, T.; Hisada, K.; Ogawa, H. Mechanism of Gallium 67 Accumulation in Inflammatory Tissue. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1990, 17, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bar-Shalom, R.; Yefremov, N.; Guralnik, L.; Keidar, Z.; Engel, A.; Nitecki, S.; Israel, O. SPECT/CT Using 67 Ga and 111 In-Labeled Leukocyte Scintigraphy for Diagnosis of Infection. J. Nucl. Med. 2006, 47, 587–594. [Google Scholar]
  24. Aslangul, E.; M’Bemba, J.; Caillat-Vigneron, N.; Coignard, S.; Larger, E.; Boitard, C.; Lipsky, B.A. Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis in Patients without Signs of Soft Tissue Infection by Coupling Hybrid 67Ga SPECT/CT with Bedside Percutaneous Bone Puncture. Diabet. Care 2013, 36, 2203–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Scremin, O.U.; Figoni, S.F.; Norman, K.; Scremin, A.M.E.; Kunkel, C.F.; Opava-Rutter, D.; Schmitter, E.D.; Bert, A.; Mandelkern, M. Preamputation Evaluation of Lower-Limb Skeletal Muscle Perfusion with H(2) (15)O Positron Emission Tomography. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2010, 89, 473–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Christensen, N.L.; Sørensen, J.; Bouchelouche, K.; Madsen, M.A.; Buhl, C.S.; Tolbod, L.P. Repeatability of [15O]H2O PET Imaging for Lower Extremity Skeletal Muscle Perfusion: A Test-Retest Study. EJNMMI Res. 2024, 14, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Depairon, M.; Depresseux, J.C.; Petermans, J.; Zicot, M. Assessment of Flow and Oxygen Delivery to the Lower Extremity in Arterial Insufficiency: A PET-Scan Study Comparison with Other Methods. Angiology 1991, 42, 788–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Burchert, W.; Schellong, S.; van den Hoff, J.; Meyer, G.J.; Alexander, K.; Hundeshagen, H. Oxygen-15-Water PET Assessment of Muscular Blood Flow in Peripheral Vascular Disease. J. Nucl. Med. 1997, 38, 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  29. Depairon, M.; Depresseux, J.C.; De Landsheere, C.; Merlo, P.; Del Fiore, G.; Quaglia, L.; Peeters, J.M.; Lamotte, D.; Zicot, M. Regional Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption in the Leg Muscles of Normal Subjects and in Those with Arterial Insufficiency. Study of the Distribution of C15O2 and of 15O2 Using Positron Emission Tomography. J. Mal. Vasc. 1988, 13, 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  30. Depairon, M.; De Landsheere, C.; Merlo, P.; Del Fiore, G.; Quaglia, L.; Peters, J.M.; Lamotte, D.; Zicot, M. Effect of Exercise on the Leg Distribution of C15O2 and 15O2 in Normals and in Patients with Peripheral Ischemia: A Study Using Positron Tomography. Int. Angiol. 1988, 7, 254–257. [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmidt, M.A.; Chakrabarti, A.; Shamim-Uzzaman, Q.; Kaciroti, N.; Koeppe, R.A.; Rajagopalan, S. Calf Flow Reserve with H(2)(15)O PET as a Quantifiable Index of Lower Extremity Flow. J. Nucl. Med. 2003, 44, 915–919. [Google Scholar]
  32. Myers, K.S.; Rudd, J.H.F.; Hailman, E.P.; Bolognese, J.A.; Burke, J.; Pinto, C.A.; Klimas, M.; Hargreaves, R.; Dansky, H.M.; Fayad, Z.A. Correlation between Arterial FDG Uptake and Biomarkers in Peripheral Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2012, 5, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jiang, Y.; Fan, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, G.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Wang, M.; Cao, Z.; Li, Q.; Wang, H.; et al. Rapid Reduction in Plaque Inflammation by Sonodynamic Therapy Inpatients with Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease:A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Cardiol. 2021, 325, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chowdhury, M.M.; Tarkin, J.M.; Albaghdadi, M.S.; Evans, N.R.; Le, E.P.V.; Berrett, T.B.; Sadat, U.; Joshi, F.R.; Warburton, E.A.; Buscombe, J.R.; et al. Vascular Positron Emission Tomography and Restenosis in Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Prospective Clinical Study. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, 1008–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Leppänen, O.; Björnheden, T.; Evaldsson, M.; Borén, J.; Wiklund, O.; Levin, M. ATP Depletion in Macrophages in the Core of Advanced Rabbit Atherosclerotic Plaques in Vivo. Atherosclerosis 2006, 188, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yun, M.; Yeh, D.; Araujo, L.I.; Jang, S.; Newberg, A.; Alavi, A. F-18 FDG Uptake in the Large Arteries: A New Observation. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2001, 26, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bural, G.G.; Torigian, D.A.; Chamroonrat, W.; Houseni, M.; Chen, W.; Basu, S.; Kumar, R.; Alavi, A. FDG-PET Is an Effective Imaging Modality to Detect and Quantify Age-Related Atherosclerosis in Large Arteries. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2008, 35, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pasha, A.K.; Moghbel, M.; Saboury, B.; Gharavi, M.H.; Blomberg, B.A.; Torigian, D.A.; Kwee, T.C.; Basu, S.; Mohler Iii, E.R.; Alavi, A. Effects of Age and Cardiovascular Risk Factors on (18)F-FDG PET/CT Quantification of Atherosclerosis in the Aorta and Peripheral Arteries. Hell. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 18, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bural, G.G.; Torigian, D.; Rubello, D.; Alavi, A. Atherosclerotic 18F-FDG and MDP Uptake in Femoral Arteries, Changes with Age. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2016, 37, 833–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rominger, A.; Saam, T.; Wolpers, S.; Cyran, C.C.; Schmidt, M.; Foerster, S.; Nikolaou, K.; Reiser, M.F.; Bartenstein, P.; Hacker, M. 18F-FDG PET/CT Identifies Patients at Risk for Future Vascular Events in an Otherwise Asymptomatic Cohort with Neoplastic Disease. J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 1611–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. de Boer, S.A.; Hovinga-de Boer, M.C.; Heerspink, H.J.L.; Lefrandt, J.D.; van Roon, A.M.; Lutgers, H.L.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Kamphuisen, P.W.; Slart, R.H.J.A.; Mulder, D.J. Arterial Stiffness Is Positively Associated with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Assessed Subclinical Vascular Inflammation in People with Early Type 2 Diabetes. Diabet. Care 2016, 39, 1440–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hetterich, H.; Rominger, A.; Walter, L.; Habs, M.; Volpers, S.; Hacker, M.; Reiser, M.F.; Bartenstein, P.; Saam, T. Natural History of Atherosclerotic Disease Progression as Assessed by (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 32, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ishii, H.; Nishio, M.; Takahashi, H.; Aoyama, T.; Tanaka, M.; Toriyama, T.; Tamaki, T.; Yoshikawa, D.; Hayashi, M.; Amano, T.; et al. Comparison of Atorvastatin 5 and 20 Mg/d for Reducing F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Atherosclerotic Plaques on Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Randomized, Investigator-Blinded, Open-Label, 6-Month Study in Japanese Adults Scheduled for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Clin. Ther. 2010, 32, 2337–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Asadollahi, S.; Rojulpote, C.; Bhattaru, A.; Patil, S.; Gonuguntla, K.; Karambelkar, P.; Borja, A.J.; Vuthaluru, K.; Seraj, S.M.; Zhang, V.; et al. Comparison of Atherosclerotic Burden in Non-Lower Extremity Arteries in Patients with and without Peripheral Artery Disease Using 18 F-NaF-PET/CT Imaging. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2020, 10, 272–278. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chou, T.H.; Wynveen, M.K.; Rimmerman, E.T.; Patel, S.; Go, M.R.; Stacy, M.R. Detection of Multivessel Calcific Disease Progression in a Patient with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Using Fluorine-18 Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. J. Vasc. Surg. Cases Innov. Tech. 2023, 9, 101137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chou, T.H.; Rimmerman, E.T.; Patel, S.; Wynveen, M.K.; Eisert, S.N.; Musini, K.N.; Janse, S.A.; Bobbey, A.J.; Sarac, T.P.; Atway, S.A.; et al. Vessel-by-Vessel Analysis of Lower Extremity 18F-NaF PET/CT Imaging Quantifies Diabetes- and Chronic Kidney Disease-Induced Active Microcalcification in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease. EJNMMI Res. 2023, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chou, T.-H.; Nabavinia, M.; Tram, N.K.; Rimmerman, E.T.; Patel, S.; Musini, K.N.; Eisert, S.N.; Wolfe, T.; Wynveen, M.K.; Matsuzaki, Y.; et al. Quantification of Skeletal Muscle Perfusion in Peripheral Artery Disease Using 18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. JAHA 2024, 13, e031823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Derlin, T.; Richter, U.; Bannas, P.; Begemann, P.; Buchert, R.; Mester, J.; Klutmann, S. Feasibility of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT for Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque. J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 862–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Janssen, T.; Bannas, P.; Herrmann, J.; Veldhoen, S.; Busch, J.D.; Treszl, A.; Münster, S.; Mester, J.; Derlin, T. Association of Linear 18F-Sodium Fluoride Accumulation in Femoral Arteries as a Measure of Diffuse Calcification with Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A PET/CT Study. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2013, 20, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Takx, R.A.P.; van Asperen, R.; Bartstra, J.W.; Zwakenberg, S.R.; Wolterink, J.M.; Celeng, C.; de Jong, P.A.; Beulens, J.W. Determinants of 18F-NaF Uptake in Femoral Arteries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2021, 28, 2700–2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Derlin, T.; Habermann, C.R.; Lengyel, Z.; Busch, J.D.; Wisotzki, C.; Mester, J.; Pávics, L. Feasibility of 11C-Acetate PET/CT for Imaging of Fatty Acid Synthesis in the Atherosclerotic Vessel Wall. J. Nucl. Med. 2011, 52, 1848–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Smith, B.C.; Quimby, E.H. The Use of Radioactive Sodium in the Study of Peripheral Vascular Disease. Ann. Surg. 1947, 125, 360–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kety, S.S. Measurement of regional circulation by the local clearance of radioactive sodium. Am. Heart J. 1949, 38, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jones, E.L.; Wagner, H.N.; Zuidema, G.D. New Method for Studying Peripheral Circulation in Man. Arch. Surg. 1965, 91, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mutluoglu, M.; Sivrioglu, A.K.; Eroglu, M.; Uzun, G.; Turhan, V.; Ay, H.; Lipsky, B.A. The Implications of the Presence of Osteomyelitis on Outcomes of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 45, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tsan, M.F. Mechanism of Gallium-67 Accumulation in Inflammatory Lesions. J. Nucl. Med. 1985, 26, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Pande, R.L.; Park, M.-A.; Perlstein, T.S.; Desai, A.S.; Doyle, J.; Navarrete, N.; Copeland-Halperin, R.S.; Redline, W.; Di Carli, M.F.; Creager, M.A. Impaired Skeletal Muscle Glucose Uptake by [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease and Intermittent Claudication. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Stacy, M.R. Molecular Imaging of Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease: An Emerging Field in Nuclear Medicine. Front. Med. 2022, 8, 793975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Stacy, M.R.; Paeng, J.C.; Sinusas, A.J. The Role of Molecular Imaging in the Evaluation of Myocardial and Peripheral Angiogenesis. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2015, 29, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Willmann, J.K.; Chen, K.; Wang, H.; Paulmurugan, R.; Rollins, M.; Cai, W.; Wang, D.S.; Chen, I.Y.; Gheysens, O.; Rodriguez-Porcel, M.; et al. Monitoring of the Biological Response to Murine Hindlimb Ischemia with 64Cu-Labeled Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-121 Positron Emission Tomography. Circulation 2008, 117, 915–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jeong, J.M.; Hong, M.K.; Chang, Y.S.; Lee, Y.-S.; Kim, Y.J.; Cheon, G.J.; Lee, D.S.; Chung, J.-K.; Lee, M.C. Preparation of a Promising Angiogenesis PET Imaging Agent: 68Ga-Labeled c(RGDyK)-Isothiocyanatobenzyl-1,4,7-Triazacyclononane-1,4,7-Triacetic Acid and Feasibility Studies in Mice. J. Nucl. Med. 2008, 49, 830–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hedhli, J.; Konopka, C.J.; Schuh, S.; Bouvin, H.; Cole, J.A.; Huntsman, H.D.; Kilian, K.A.; Dobrucki, I.T.; Boppart, M.D.; Dobrucki, L.W. Multimodal Assessment of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Diabetic Vascular Complications. Theranostics 2017, 7, 3876–3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Orbay, H.; Zhang, Y.; Hong, H.; Hacker, T.A.; Valdovinos, H.F.; Zagzebski, J.A.; Theuer, C.P.; Barnhart, T.E.; Cai, W. Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Angiogenesis in a Murine Hindlimb Ischemia Model with 64Cu-Labeled TRC105. Mol. Pharm. 2013, 10, 2749–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Orbay, H.; Hong, H.; Koch, J.M.; Valdovinos, H.F.; Hacker, T.A.; Theuer, C.P.; Barnhart, T.E.; Cai, W. Pravastatin Stimulates Angiogenesis in a Murine Hindlimb Ischemia Model: A Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Study with 64 Cu-NOTA-TRC105. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2014, 6, 54–63. [Google Scholar]
  65. Lareyre, F.; Behrendt, C.A.; Chaudhuri, A.; Lee, R.; Carrier, M.; Adam, C.; Lê, C.D.; Raffort, J. Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease. J. Vasc. Surg. 2023, 77, 650–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Krittanawong, C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Aydar, M.; Kitai, T. Artificial Intelligence in Precision Cardiovascular Medicine. JACC 2017, 69, 2657–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Luo, X.; Ara, L.; Ding, H.; Rollins, D.; Motaganahalli, R.; Sawchuk, A.P. Computational Methods to Automate the Initial Interpretation of Lower Extremity Arterial Doppler and Duplex Carotid Ultrasound Studies. J. Vasc. Surg. 2021, 74, 988–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dai, L.; Zhou, Q.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, P.; Ding, M.; Xu, X.; Zhang, X. Deep Learning-Based Classification of Lower Extremity Arterial Stenosis in Computed Tomography Angiography. Eur. J. Radiol. 2021, 136, 109528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhang, J.L.; Conlin, C.C.; Li, X.; Layec, G.; Chang, K.; Kalpathy-Cramer, J.; Lee, V.S. Exercise-Induced Calf Muscle Hyperemia: Rapid Mapping of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deep Learning Approach. Physiol. Rep. 2020, 8, e14563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gao, J.M.; Ren, Z.H.; Pan, X.; Chen, Y.X.; Zhu, W.; Li, W.; Yang, Y.X.; Fu, G.X. Identifying Peripheral Arterial Disease in the Elderly Patients Using Machine-Learning Algorithms. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2022, 34, 679–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cox, M.; Reid, N.; Panagides, J.C.; Di Capua, J.; DeCarlo, C.; Dua, A.; Kalva, S.; Kalpathy-Cramer, J.; Daye, D. Interpretable Machine Learning for the Prediction of Amputation Risk Following Lower Extremity Infrainguinal Endovascular Interventions for Peripheral Arterial Disease. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 2022, 45, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Normahani, P.; Sounderajah, V.; Mandic, D.; Jaffer, U. Machine Learning-Based Classification of Arterial Spectral Waveforms for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease in the Context of Diabetes: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Vasc. Med. 2022, 27, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT perfusion imaging before and after endovascular revascularization in (A) a low perfusion responder and (B) a high perfusion responder with CLTI. The patient with a high perfusion response to revascularization remained amputation-free for one year after intervention, while the low perfusion responder underwent an amputation procedure within one month of intervention [15].
Figure 1. 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT perfusion imaging before and after endovascular revascularization in (A) a low perfusion responder and (B) a high perfusion responder with CLTI. The patient with a high perfusion response to revascularization remained amputation-free for one year after intervention, while the low perfusion responder underwent an amputation procedure within one month of intervention [15].
Ijms 25 07474 g001
Figure 2. Examples of 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging in (A) a healthy control subject, (B) a PAD patient without diabetes mellitus (DM), and (C) a PAD patient with DM, demonstrating increased retention of 18F-NaF and increased arterial calcification in lower extremity arteries in the presence of DM and worsening status of PAD [46]. White arrows denote regions of arterial retention of 18F-NaF.
Figure 2. Examples of 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging in (A) a healthy control subject, (B) a PAD patient without diabetes mellitus (DM), and (C) a PAD patient with DM, demonstrating increased retention of 18F-NaF and increased arterial calcification in lower extremity arteries in the presence of DM and worsening status of PAD [46]. White arrows denote regions of arterial retention of 18F-NaF.
Ijms 25 07474 g002
Table 1. Clinical applications of SPECT and PET imaging for evaluation of PAD.
Table 1. Clinical applications of SPECT and PET imaging for evaluation of PAD.
ModalityRadioisotopePhysiologic TargetReference
SPECT201Tlperfusion[1,8,9,10,11,12]
99mTc-sestamibiperfusion[1,11,12]
99mTc-tetrofosminperfusion[1,9,11,12,13,14,15,16]
99mTc-diphosphonate + 111In-WBCosteomyelitis, infection[17,18,19]
99mTc-antigranulocyte antibodiesosteomyelitis, infection[20]
67Ga-citrateosteomyelitis, infection[21,22,23,24]
PETH215Operfusion[25,26,27,28,29,30,31]
15O2perfusion[27,29,30]
C15O2perfusion[29,30]
18F-FDGmetabolism, atherosclerosis[32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]
18F-NaFperfusion, atherosclerosis[34,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]
11C-acetateatherosclerosis[51]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rimmerman, E.T.; Stacy, M.R. Applications of SPECT and PET Imaging for the Physiological Evaluation of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7474. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137474

AMA Style

Rimmerman ET, Stacy MR. Applications of SPECT and PET Imaging for the Physiological Evaluation of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(13):7474. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137474

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rimmerman, Eleanor T., and Mitchel R. Stacy. 2024. "Applications of SPECT and PET Imaging for the Physiological Evaluation of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 13: 7474. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137474

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop