1. Introduction
Iron is an essential element required for the proper functioning of living organisms. In mammals, iron is primarily obtained through the absorption of dietary inorganic non-heme and heme iron through specific pathways (reviewed in [
1,
2]). Systemic iron availability is regulated by the iron hormone hepcidin (Hepc), which is produced by hepatocytes and controls the transfer of iron from enterocytes, macrophages, and hepatocytes to plasma [
3]. Specifically, Hepc binds the iron exporter Ferroportin 1 (Fpn1), triggering Fpn1 internalization and its proteolysis and reducing de facto iron export from cells [
4,
5].
Hepc transcription is controlled by numerous upstream regulators [
3,
6,
7,
8,
9], including hemochromatosis-associated proteins such as Hfe and TfR2. Mutations in human
HFE and
TFR2 genes cause Hemochromatosis type 1 and 3, respectively, a genetic heterogeneous disease that results in body iron accumulation due to abnormally low Hepc production [
10,
11]. Consequently, patients present with hyperferremia, high transferrin saturation (TS), and accumulation of iron in parenchymal tissues, particularly in the liver and the heart [
12]. The same phenotype has been successfully recapitulated in animal models of hereditary hemochromatosis [
13]. According to the most recent functional model, Hfe alternatively binds transferrin receptors 1 and 2 (TfR1 and TfR2, respectively) in its extracellular α1-α2 domain and is required for the physiological regulation of hepatic synthesis of Hepc [
14]. Accordingly, mice with constitutive or liver-specific inactivation of
Hfe or
TfR2, or both, showed reduced levels of hepatic Hepc expression and a considerable iron overload in the liver, which was the highest in mice with combined Hfe and TfR2 deficiencies [
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24]. These latter observations suggested that the functions of Hfe and TfR2 are not entirely co-dependent, even though they are both involved in the regulation of hepatic Hepc.
In addition to the essential role of Hfe and TfR2 in hepatic Hepc regulation, abnormal iron metabolism in myeloid cells/macrophages has been documented in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis. For example, patients with mutations in
HFE or
TFR2 have iron-deficient splenic macrophages despite a body iron overload [
25]. Moreover, the TfR2 beta isoform is highly expressed in macrophages and its inactivation in mice results in iron perturbation in splenic macrophages and the bone marrow [
23,
26]. In addition to pathological conditions, natural aging influences macrophages and their ability to maintain iron homeostasis [
25,
27].
Macrophages are cells present in all tissues and, among their different metabolic functions, they are responsible for handling iron, thereby regulating the tissue iron pool and the subsequent tissue microenvironment [
27]. Iron is redistributed by macrophages for two primary reasons: it must be supplied for cellular needs, being essential for erythropoiesis, and it is sequestered for bacteriostasis. However, tissue-resident macrophages may also serve as a bioavailable iron storage compartment and be used according to local tissue needs, thus local iron availability must be controlled to ensure cellular iron homeostasis. Macrophages take up transferrin (Tf)-bound iron through the well-known holo-Tf/TfR1 pathway, while the unbound iron is introduced into the cells via a main transmembrane channel (Divalent Metal Channel, DMT1) [
27]. Additionally, macrophages import iron in heme and hemoglobin derived from intravascular RBC hemolysis through Heme-hemopexin (Hx-Heme) and haemoglobin-haptoglobin (Hb-Hp)-mediated endocytosis, respectively [
2]. Excess iron that is not utilized is either exported via Fpn1 or stored within the cytosol in a stable form within ferritin (Ft). This ability of macrophages to regulate iron availability in the microenvironment, thereby contributing to cellular/tissue function, depends on local iron necessity and may be independent of systemic iron homeostasis [
27]. Specifically, iron-rich macrophages within erythroid islands in the bone marrow are suggested to provide iron for erythropoiesis and express many proteins involved in iron metabolism, such as TfR1, Fpn1, and Hepc [
28]. Conversely, splenic red pulp macrophages play a role in recycling iron from senescent erythrocytes [
29]. Finally, studies performed in aged mice carrying a targeted deletion of
Hfe in their myeloid cells (HfeLysMCre mice) revealed a noteworthy variation in hepatic and splenic iron parameters and impaired iron metabolism in isolated macrophages independent of
Hepc expression [
30].
To determine if the Hfe and Tfr2 proteins in macrophages influence iron metabolism separately, collectively, or at different ages, a novel murine mouse line was developed that contained double Hfe/TfR2 silencing in these cell types (Hfe/TfR2 KO, DKO). Herein, the repercussions of lacking macrophage Hfe/TfR2 activities on systemic and cellular iron metabolism are described.
Moreover, DKO animals were investigated at the same ages in which macrophage Hfe or TfR2 single KOs displayed improper iron metabolism.
Our data show the indispensable role of Hfe and TfR2 in the regulation of hepatic hepcidin production and in iron homeostasis in the spleen and bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), which are crucial for iron management during aging.
3. Discussion
This study reports the systemic and local effects of two major hemochromatosis proteins on iron metabolism in a new double knockout mouse model (Hfe/TfR2 KO, DKO), in which the Hfe and TfR2 genes were selectively silenced in macrophages.
It is known that Hfe and TfR2 cooperate in the modulation of the iron hormone Hepc in hepatocytes. Several studies on cell cultures indicate that Hfe and TfR2 interact as a complex that is required for Hepc activation [
14,
32], although the specific functional relationship between these two proteins is not clear. On the contrary, Schmidt et al. demonstrated that
Hfe transgene-induced hepatic Hepc expression occurred even if
TfR2 is downregulated, suggesting that the interaction is not absolutely required for Hepc induction in vivo and that
TfR2 is not essential for the effects of the
Hfe transgene on iron metabolism [
33]. Furthermore, details on the possible role of Hfe and TfR2 in iron metabolism regulation in cells other than hepatocytes are not yet clear. The present study reports that silencing
Hfe and
TfR2 in macrophages induced the upregulation of hepatic
Hepc transcription, although it is dispensable for hepatic iron regulation, highlighting the macrophage-specific functions of these two Hereditary Hemochromatosis proteins [
34,
35] in the regulation of cellular and tissue iron homeostasis.
From a phenotypic point of view, DKO animals were viable and fertile, and no physical or behavioral abnormalities were observed compared to control mice at both analyzed ages, apart from a lower body weight in adult DKOs compared to age-matched controls. This could be due to the diminished iron provided by the adult DKO spleen, in which the iron exporter Fpn1 is reduced because of a hepatic Hepc increase. The iron available could be preferentially used for erythropoiesis, which, based upon the unaltered Erythropoietin (Epo) production in these mice, seems to be normal, at the expense of mice body growth.
The lower spleen weight without changes in their size usually indicates an impairment in splenic functionality, further confirming that adult DKO spleens present a lower intracellular iron amount.
The situation appears to be no longer compensated during aging so that, irrespective of the stop in animal growth, serum iron parameters significantly change in aged DKO mice, according to an iron deficiency condition demonstrated by a significant reduction in serum iron (SI) level, as well as lower Transferrin saturation, and a striking increase in sTf. In agreement, hepatic Hepc is reduced in aged DKO mice and splenic Fpn1 is consequently increased. All these data support the hypothesis of impaired erythropoiesis in these animals due to iron deficiency, confirmed by the increase in Epo production in the kidneys of aged DKO animals. Our results suggest that the combined silencing of
Hfe and
TfR2 in macrophages leads to an alteration in the transcriptional regulation of splenic Fpn1 in adult DKO animals, which conflicts with the corresponding low protein amount. It would be interesting to clarify if this low Fpn1 amount is the consequence of the increased hepatic Hepc production rather than IRE/IRP-dependent post-transcriptional regulation [
36]. As regards the splenic Fpn1 increase in DKO aged mice, it mirrored the Fpn1 detected in the spleens of single Hfe KO aged mice [
30], but the additional lack of TfR2 causes an additional Fpn1 increase vs. Hfe single KO (2x vs 0.2, respectively). Nonetheless, splenic iron export by Fpn1 is not sufficient to satisfy the iron need in aged DKO mice, so serum iron deficiency develops in older animals. Again, the SI and Hepc amounts in DKO aged mice agree with the result obtained in the macrophage-specific Hfe KO mouse model of the same age [
30], even if the DKO SI and Hepc levels are far lower than those of Hfe single KO, demonstrating that
TfR2 silencing further exacerbates the macrophages’ specific
Hfe silencing effect on iron metabolism and confirming the role of Hfe and TfR2 in balancing serum iron levels in aged animals (
Figure 7).
All these data strengthen the hypothesis on the cooperation of Hfe and TfR2 in iron metabolism outside of hepatocytes [
37] and that the specific TfR2 loss of function causes the worsening of the altered macrophage cellular phenotype compared to Hfe KO [
30].
Since both alpha and beta
TfR2 isoforms [
38] are inactivated in the DKO animals, it is currently not possible to discriminate if one or both are involved in splenic Fpn1 regulation, but some speculations could be made comparing the results obtained on adult DKO spleens and TfR2 beta-specific knock out mice (TfR2 KI) of the same age [
23]. While the spleens of adult KI mice were overloaded with iron, with decreased
Fpn1 transcription and translation, the adult DKO spleens are in the opposite situation. This could support the hypothesis of a functional competition between the TfR2 alpha and beta isoforms in the transcriptional regulation of Fpn1.
Considering that this novel mouse model presents macrophage-specific
Hfe and
TfR2 deletion, iron metabolism in Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages (BMDMs) was examined as they play a pivotal role in iron supply for erythropoiesis [
27,
28]. Here, it is shown that the targeted deletion of
Hfe and
TfR2 resulted in reduced levels of the iron exporter Fpn1 in adult DKO animals. Similar findings were reported in TfR2-targeted peritoneal macrophages in a previous study [
39], and it became particularly evident in aged DKO mice. While the
Fpn1 gene is transcriptionally downregulated in adult BMDMs, in aged mice, BMDMs were post-transcriptionally downmodulated by the IRE/IRPS system, which seemed to be functioning. In any case, a reduction in the level of the Fpn1 protein, confirmed in DKO mice through IF, usually occurs when intracellular iron levels are low.
Iron deficiency in adult DKO BMDMs is corroborated by the results of TfR1, the primary iron importer, since the levels of this protein substantially increase. In contrast, TfR1 nearly disappears in the BMDMs of aged DKO mice, along with the iron importer DMT1. Along with TfR1, reduced levels of Fpn1, DMT1, and Ft suggest that the BMDMs of aged DKO mice have suppressed overall iron uptake and export compared to age-matched CTRLs.
It is undeniable that the data presented in this manuscript are mainly descriptive, although they could represent the starting point to finely clarify the molecular basis of the evident phenotypic alterations described here.
Moreover, the possibility of comparing the results from DKO BMDMs with the BMDMs of Hfe [
30] and TfR2 [
39] single macrophage-specific KOs allows us to draw some conclusions about the differential functions of the two proteins in macrophages. It appears clear that TfR2 controls Fpn1 gene transcription and protein production in BMDMs from adult mice, as they are decreased both in DKO and in TfR2 KO BMDMs [
39], while Hfe is dispensable because no Fpn1 variation could be found in Hfe KO BMDMs from mice of the same age [
30]. More complex is the situation regarding the BMDMs of aged mice. No data are available for aged TfR2 KO BMDMs, and although DKO and Hfe KO BMDMs are iron depleted, Fpn1 transcription is not modified and the protein is reduced in DKO, while it is increased in Hfe KO, along with the Fpn1 protein [
30]. These data could be in favor of a predominant role of Hfe in regulating Fpn1 at this animal age. On the contrary, the TfR2-specific regulation of TfR1 expression in the BMDMs of aged mice is particularly evident and dominant over Hfe, since no changes in this protein could be found in Hfe KO BMDMs [
30].
It is important to point out that the comparative analysis of inbred Hfe and Tfr2 single KOs in macrophages will significantly help in demonstrating the above-suggested hypothesis and they are worth studying in both adult and aged animals.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Mice
C57BL/6J/sv129 male mice of different ages (adult, 10 weeks old, and aged, 45–52 weeks old) were used. The animals’ age interval was chosen according to Harrison Laboratory’s online article (
https://www.jax.org/research-and-faculty/research-labs/the-harrison-lab/gerontology/life-span-as-a-biomarker (accessed on 30 July 2024)). Each group of mice was fed with a standard diet (VRF1, Special Diets Services, Essex, United Kingdom). Animal housing and all the experimental procedures were performed in accordance with European (Official Journal of the European Union L276, 20/10/2010, Vol. 53, pp. 33–80) and National Legislation (Official Journal n° 61, 14 March 2014, pp. 2–68) for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, and the experimental procedure was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Turin and conducted according to the ARRIVE guidelines.
The number of mice analyzed in each experiment varied on the basis of the necessity of performing multiple analyses on small-sized organs and the small amount of material obtained (in the case of BM-derived macrophages), as well as the physiological time needed for animal aging, taking in consideration the 3Rs principle for animal experimentation. The higher number of 9 animals was utilized to measure noninvasive parameters.
Mice were anesthetized before all invasive procedures with ketamine, 100 mg/kg (Ketavet, Bayern, Leverkusen, Germany; Xylazine, 5 mg/kg; Bayer, Milan, Italy), and sacrificed by cervical dislocation.
4.2. DNA Extraction and Genotyping
A mouse tail biopsy was treated with 600 μL of lysis buffer (100 nM Tris-Cl pH 8, 5 mM EDTA pH8, 200 mM NaCl, 0.2%SDS) and 10 μL of proteinase K (Promega S.r.l, Milan, Italy), and incubated at 55 °C for 3 h. DNA extraction was achieved using a phenol/chloroform-based procedure. The DNA pellet was resuspended in 200 μL of dH2O. PCR reaction for genotyping was performed with primers and protocols specific for the Hfe, TfR2, and Cre-recombinase genes (
Supplemental Table S1).
4.3. Serum Iron
Blood was collected from the retro-orbital sinus of anaesthetized mice. Blood samples were centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 10 min to collect serum. Serum iron (SI) levels were assessed using a commercial kit (Iron Direct Method, Bioabo, Mainz, France), following the manufacturer’s instructions. TS was measured using the ab239715 Kit (Abcam Ltd., Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer’s suggestions. The absorbance was measured in a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 600 nm.
4.4. Liver and Spleen Non-Heme Iron Content
Following dissection, part of the tissues were taken to analyze liver and spleen nonheme iron content (LIC and SIC, respectively). This analysis was performed according to the standard reported protocol [
23].
4.5. Prussian Blue Perls’ Staining
After sacrifice and dissection, the liver and spleen were explanted, post-fixed in PFA for 24 h at 4 °C, and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in 0.12 M phosphate buffer. Tissues were cut by cryostat in 30 μm thick sections and were stained for non-heme ferrous iron by Prussian blue Perls using a commercial kit (Bio-Optica, Milan, Italy).
4.6. Isolation of Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages (BMDMs)
The animal’s femur and tibia were transferred into a cell culture plate with 80% ethanol for 15 s to decontaminate them and then in DMEM (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) to remove excess ethanol. Then, both ends of the bones were cut and the bone marrow was flushed with 2.5 mL of medium. Cells were filtered and the suspension was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 7 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was suspended in a culture medium containing DMEM with 400 mg/L glucose, 100 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), 100 mM sodium pyruvate (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), penicillin/streptomycin 100x (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), 10x FBS (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), and the culture supernatant of L929 cells, obtained via the standard culture protocol [
40]. The suspended pellet was divided into three 100 mm Petri dishes (Aurogene, Rome, Italy) for 10 days of incubation at 37 °C, 5% CO
2. The DMEM medium was changed every two days. After ten days of culture, the differentiated macrophages were collected and stored at −80 °C.
4.7. Real-Time Quantitative PCR
Total RNA was isolated from homogenized livers, spleens, and bone marrow cellular pellets using Trizol Reagent (Ambion, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription was performed with an iScript kit, (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s recommendation of 1–3 μg of RNA. The expressions of Hepc, Fpn1, Hfe, DMT1, and β-glucuronidase (Gus-β) were evaluated with TaqMan technology (TaqMan Universal Master Mix, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The AoD codes of each gene are reported in
Table S2. TfR1 and TfR2 expressions were determined using CYBR Technology; each gene-specific primer is reported in
Table S2. The C1000 Thermal Cycler CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was utilized. All analyses were carried out in biological and technical replicates and the target mRNA was compared to age-matched DKO and CTRL mice groups. Transcriptional data were evaluated by taking 2^-delta delta Ct values normalized to the mean of age-matched CTRLs.
4.8. Protein Isolation
Livers, spleens, kidneys, and BMDMs were lysed using the RIPA lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% Sodium Deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS 50 mM Tris-Cl pH 8.0), together with a mixture of protease inhibitors (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), and the lysate was incubated for 30 min in a shaker at 4 °C. The samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 13,000 rpm at 4 °C and the supernatant was collected. The quantification with the colorimetric method (Protein Assay Dye reagent, Bio-Rad) was carried out at a final dilution of 1:1000.
4.9. Western Blotting (WB)
An average amount of 30 μg of protein was separated by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis with a 6–12% acrylamide gel, while 2 μL of serum was used for Transferrin determination. Electrophoresis was performed and the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Milan, Italy). The membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against anti-Fpn1, DMT1, FtH, Tf, and β−actin, all provided by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA, as well as anti-Epo (Immunological Sciences, Rome, Italy) and anti-TfR1 and Vinculin antibodies (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Following incubation with the secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT, immunoreactivity was detected using the chemiluminescence kit (Western Lightning Plus ECL, Newton Abbot, UK) and a ChemiDoc XRS instrument. For protein quantification, Image Lab 4.0.1 software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used.
4.10. Immunofluorescence (IF)
Macrophages isolated from bone marrow (BMDMs) were collected and plated in culture in 6-well plates with slides for 1–2 days to allow engraftment. The slides were then washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS pH 7.4 for 10 min at RT. The cells were then treated with 3% blocking solution in 1x PBS for 30 min, then primary antibody anti-Fpn1 (see above) was added to the cell suspension, which was stored overnight at 4 °C. After washing, the cells were incubated with the secondary antibody Alexa fluor 488 Green (1: 500, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) for 1 h at RT in the dark. Then, 1 µL of DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) was added for 5 min to stain nuclei and subsequently washed with dH2O. The slides were dried and mounted on microscope slides with tris-glycerol supplemented with 10% Moviol (Calbiochem, LaJolla, CA, USA) and examined with the Zeiss LSM 800 confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss, Feldbach, Switzerland). The images were taken at 63x magnification. Signal strength was measured using ImageJ 1.38v software. BMDMs from 3 different animals for each genotype/age were analyzed. Fluorescence from thirty-five cells have been evaluated for each mouse. The Fpn1 fluorescence was normalized to nuclei (DAPI).
4.11. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7.00 software, in which DKO mice were always compared to age-matched CTRL animals. All the graphs show error bars that denote standard deviation, and the values are normalized using the mean of the CTRL animals. For statistical analysis, an Unpaired Student t-test (two-tailed) was used. All analyses with p < 0.05 were indicated as statistically significant (* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001).