Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Synthesis of Non-Alternating Polyketone Generated by Copolymerization of Carbon Monoxide and Ethylene
Next Article in Special Issue
New Discoveries on Protein Recruitment and Regulation during the Early Stages of the DNA Damage Response Pathways
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibition of Autophagy Aggravates Arachis hypogaea L. Skin Extracts-Induced Apoptosis in Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Multifaceted Functions of TRPV4 and Calcium Oscillations in Tissue Repair
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

SumVg: Total Heritability Explained by All Variants in Genome-Wide Association Studies Based on Summary Statistics with Standard Error Estimates

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(2), 1347; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25021347
by Hon-Cheong So 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,*, Xiao Xue 1, Zhijie Ma 1 and Pak-Chung Sham 8
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(2), 1347; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25021347
Submission received: 13 October 2023 / Revised: 15 January 2024 / Accepted: 16 January 2024 / Published: 22 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in “Molecular Biology”)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

My comments are included in the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is an interesting study that report a self-developed program to estimate the SE of SNP-based heritability from GWAS summary statistics by comparing several resampling-based approaches. They have also validated their method by applying the program to estimate SNP-based 22 heritability of 12 immune-related traits (levels of cytokines and growth factors). The results seems consistent and convincing, which could be useful for researchers in the field. I only suggest that the main results from Table 2&4 could be better represented and illustrated in more visually effective figures?   

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

My comments are in the attached word file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The paper has minor typographical errors which needs to be corrected.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I thank the authors for addressing my concerns. I only have one comment. In the revision letter the authors have agreed to several points that I highlighted as limitations to their current approach. However, I did not see them mentioned in the discussion section of the revised manuscript. Can the authors clearly mention all the current limitations (in a paragraph or two) in their discussion section so that the readers/users become aware of them.

Other than the above corrections, I have no further comment.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop