Next Article in Journal
Adaptation of High-Altitude Plants to Harsh Environments: Application of Phenotypic-Variation-Related Methods and Multi-Omics Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Medium Polarity in the Efficiency of Albumin Binding with Hydrophobic Ligands: Experimental Studies and a Molecular Dynamics Investigation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Identification and Characterization of a Novel CCDC6::CASP7 Gene Rearrangement in an Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patient: A Case Report

1
Department of Pathology, Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), University Hospital of Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente, 58-182, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
2
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain
3
Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Avila, 05004 Avila, Spain
4
Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Avila, 05004 Avila, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered as senior last authors.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(23), 12665; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312665
Submission received: 23 October 2024 / Revised: 18 November 2024 / Accepted: 22 November 2024 / Published: 26 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Oncology)

Abstract

:
Despite the existence of effective therapy options for patients with localized colorectal cancer, advanced-stage patients have limited therapies. Genomic profiling is a promising tool for guiding treatment selection as well as patient monitoring. Here, we describe a novel gene rearrangement (CCDC6::CASP7) detected in a patient with advanced colorectal cancer that could be a therapeutic target. The patient underwent surgical resection but died after the operation from fecal peritonitis. To our knowledge, this is the first report in which the CCDC6::CASP7 gene rearrangement has been described in an advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma patient.

1. Introduction

Worldwide, sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths and the third most frequently malignancy diagnosed [1]. Up to a quarter of CRC cases present with stage IV disease, and half of the cases diagnosed at an early stage go on to develop metastases over the course of the disease. Early detection and effective treatment strategies are crucial to improving survival rates and reducing the burden of this malignancy. Patients with advanced disease have few treatment options, which contributes significantly to mortality [2]. Thus, the five-year survival rate for advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) is <10% [3]. Precision medicine for aCRC has shown that as our understanding of the genomic landscape of tumors deepens, the therapeutic paradigm expands. In this regard, the discovery of new biomarkers and their integration into clinical practice has enhanced the ability to diagnose, predict prognosis and select more effective treatments. However, chromosomal rearrangements that are potentially characteristic of such advanced stages of the disease are complex and, so far, only partially understood. In the present study, we found that only 1 of the 73 consecutive patients with aCRC analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques showed a CCDC6::CASP7 (coiled-coil domain-containing 6::caspase 7) rearrangement that could be a therapeutic target. In fact, low levels of CCDC6 expression in non-small-cell lung (NSCLC) cancer have been shown to confer resistance to chemotherapy and sensitivity to the poliADP-ribosa polimerasa (PARP) inhibitor [4]. Moreover, a synergistic effect on NSCLC cells lines was observed when the inhibitor was combined with cisplatin [4]. The same thing happens in malignant pleural mesothelioma [5]. Morra et al. [6] also demonstrated in the HCT116 cell line of CRC that low CCDC6 expression increases sensitivity to olaparib [6]. However, it is still unclear whether this rearrangement itself affects the altered expression or function of the caspase 7 protein.
In this article, we present the case of an 87-year-old male with aCRC carrying CCDC6::CASP7 rearrangements, caused by an inversion of the intergenic segment between the two genes. In addition to fusion, somatic mutations of proto-oncogenes PIK3CA (phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha) (E542K) and KRAS (kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) (G12C) were detected (Supplementary Materials). The patient underwent surgical resection but died from fecal peritonitis after the operation.

2. Case Presentation

An 87-year-old man was referred by his physician for abdominal pain of months of evolution and recent vomiting. Computed tomography (CT) imaging showed a perforated cecum neoplasm with hepatic metastases. Immediate right hemicolectomy was performed in May 2019, in the Surgery Department of Hospital Nuestra Señora de Sonsoles (Ávila, Spain). During surgery, an enlarged tumor was observed that reached the wall of the right iliac fossa and featured abundant purulent and fecaloid liquid in the abdominal cavity. The pathology department received a 26 cm segment of the right colon with a perforated area. Pathological findings revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with microsatellite stability (MSS). It was microscopically confirmed that the tumor infiltrates serosa (pT4a) with metastasis in 7 out of 16 lymph nodes analyzed (pN2b).
The Oncomine Precision Assay (OPA), which enables the simultaneous detection of hotspot mutations (substitutions, insertions, and deletions), copy number variations (CNVs) and gene fusions across 50 cancer-related genes using the Ion Torrent GX5 Chip, was used to perform NGS. Using the OncomineTM Reporter program (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA), data were analyzed automatically. The Variant Matrix Summary filter (version 5.16) was used to filter the findings. This filter offers an overview of hotspot mutations, including the modifications to the amino acids and the allelic frequency. Furthermore, it indicates the number of readings of detected fusions and provides numerical values for CNVs. The patient’s genomic profile revealed oncogenic mutations in PIK3CA (E542K; allele frequency: 17.8%) and KRAS (G12C; allele frequency: 33.1%) proto-oncogenes, as well as the CCDC6::CASP7 rearrangement (Figure 1 Panel A, and Supplementary Materials). The NGS results show that the rearrangement produces two different transcripts. In the most frequent transcript (70% of reads), the first 95 amino acids of exon 1 of CCDC6 are fused with the first two amino acids of exon 2 of CASP7. In contrast, the second transcript (30% of reads) preserves the first 82 amino acids of exon 1 of CCDC6, and due to a deletion of a base, a frameshift occurs that allows exon 2 of CASP7 to be read correctly (Figure 1; panel A).
In addition, to determine whether the rearrangement is caused by a deletion or inversion of the intergenic segment between the genes CCDC6 (10q21.2) and CASP7 (10q25.3), we performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to assess the loss of the PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) gene, located at 10q23.3. FISH analysis revealed a normal number of hybridization signals for both the gene and the centromere of chromosome 10, suggesting that the fusion is caused by an inversion of the intergenic segment between the two genes (Figure 1; panel B).
Informed consent was obtained from the patient prior to their participation in the study, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the local ethics committee at the University Hospital of Salamanca (Salamanca, Spain): code 2024/07; year, 2024.

3. Discussion

Finding new treatments for cancer is a medical necessity, particularly when the disease is advanced. In this scenario, aCRC provokes a higher death rate, primarily because the antitumoral drugs that are currently on the market fail. To improve the prognosis of cancer patients, it is crucial to identify novel genetic changes in tumor samples that are amenable to pharmacological treatment. NGS techniques have revolutionized molecular tumor testing in oncology by offering the simultaneous assessment of many gene regions using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded clinical samples. NGS is currently used in pathological anatomy services, primarily in NSCLC, to identify molecular changes that can be treated with medication. To find novel, potentially treatable molecular changes in a subset of 73 consecutive aCRC patients whose treatment choices are scarce, we therefore undertook an NGS investigation.
In this case report, we describe for the first time a rearrangement of CCDC6::CASP7 in aCRC. CCDC6 was first identified in papillary thyroid carcinoma as a result of the rearrangement of an unknown amino-terminal sequence with the tyrosine kinase domain of the RET proto-oncogene [7]. In addition, CCDC6 has subsequently been described as being involved in other rearrangements, in addition to RET, in different neoplasias [8]. In In fact, up to 26 different rearrangements involving the CCDC6 gene have been noted (FusionGDB 2.0 database). Several studies have shown that CCDC6 can fuse with RET in CRC [9,10,11,12]. This fusion has been associated with aggressive tumor behavior and poor prognosis in this type of neoplasia [9]. In general, these types of fusions lead to increased kinase activity and result in the silencing or disruption of CCDC6 normal function.
Here, we identify the mechanism leading to the generation of the oncogenic sequence CCDC6::CASP7 by NGS and FISH techniques. FISH analysis revealed that the fusion is caused by an inversion of the intergenic segment between the two genes. These findings are in line with the rearrangements found by Pierotti et al. [13] on the long arm of chromosome 10, juxtaposing the tyrosine kinase domain of the RET gene with the 5′ end of the locus D10S170. Similarly, Hamatani et al. [14] demonstrated that ACBD5::RET fusions are produced by pericentric inversion, inv(10)(p12.1;q11.2), in papillary thyroid cancer.
CCDC6 is a protein that is ubiquitously expressed and involved in several critical cellular processes, including transcription regulation, DNA damage response (DDR), and apoptosis [4,8,15,16]. Truncated forms of CCDC6, such as those retaining only the first 101 amino acids (commonly found in RET fusions), act as dominant negatives, impairing the protein’s pro-apoptotic function and proper nuclear localization [17]. On the other hand, caspase 7 is a protein involved in apoptosis (programmed cell death), and its dysfunction or genetic alterations, such as fusions, can disrupt this process [18]. CASP7 gene fusions could produce abnormal proteins that interfere with the ability of cells to effectively execute apoptosis, potentially contributing to tumor cell survival and cancer progression.
In the fusion that we have identified, the majority transcript should produce a chimeric protein in which the function of both proteins is lost. The same occurs with the minor transcript, which, despite expressing exon 2 of caspase 7, lacks exon 1, which is critical for the complete structure and proper function of the protein. Therefore, this transcript would also result in a loss of function for both proteins.
The patient’s mutational status revealed that, in addition to the CCDC6::CASP7 fusion, he had two mutations, one in KRAS and one in PIK3CA, which ruled him out as a candidate for targeted therapy with anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) antibodies. However, a study conducted in colorectal cancer demonstrated that the CCDC6::RET fusion is mutually exclusive with other important driver mutations, such as KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA [12]. It has been reported that the loss or inactivation of CCDC6 leads to premature mitotic entry, reduces the DDR and consequently prevents the induction of apoptosis [4,16]. These findings suggest that tumors with CDCC6 loss of function could be sensitive to a combination of antimitotic drugs and compounds that affect DNA damage [19,20]. In fact, previous studies indicated that the loss of function of the CCDC6 gene confers resistance to cisplatin and sensitizes tumor cells to PARP inhibitors [4,21].
Mutations in the KRAS gene often drive oncogenic signaling, which increases genomic instability and oxidative stress [22]. This might indirectly impact the CCDC6 gene, as its role in DDR becomes more critical in cells with high mutation loads [16]. The loss or dysfunction of CCDC6 could exacerbate the oncogenic effects of KRAS, as impaired DDR would allow for the unchecked accumulation of mutations, fueling cancer progression. In addition, if CCDC6 is mutated or downregulated, the lack of genomic stability might indirectly enhance KRAS-driven oncogenesis by promoting a permissive environment for tumor growth. In this regard, DDR inhibitors (like PARP inhibitors) in combination with inhibitors of the MAPK/ERK pathway may exploit the vulnerabilities created by CCDC6 loss and KRAS mutation [23].
In summary, we provide comprehensive evidence that CCDC6 plays a pivotal role in maintaining genomic stability by modulating the DDR and cell cycle progression. Its loss of function or inactivation, particularly through chromosomal translocation with CASP7, enhances susceptibility to cancer by impairing accurate DNA repair and promoting premature cell division, in the absence of cell death. The identification of CCDC6:CASP7 rearrangements in patients with aCRC could help select patients who might benefit from treatment with PARP inhibitors alone or in combination with other treatments. In this context, techniques such as FISH could enable the precise detection of these gene rearrangements and help determine their true incidence in aCRC, as well as in other neoplasms. Additional prospective studies in larger series of patients are required to confirm the clinical utility of this biomarker.
To our knowledge, this is the first report identifying the CCDC6::CASP7 rearrangement in a patient with aCRC, making it a target for further research and potential therapeutic intervention.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms252312665/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.M., M.A. and J.M.S.; methodology, S.A. and A.J.-P.; formal analysis, R.T. and E.F.; investigation, J.C.M. and J.M.S.; resources, M.A.; data curation, M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.M. and J.M.S.; writing—review and editing, J.C.M. and J.M.S.; supervision, M.A.; funding acquisition, M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been partially supported by grants from the Gerencia Regional de Salud (GRS) de Castilla y León, Valladolid, Spain (GRS/A1/2024).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by local ethics committee at the University Hospital of Salamanca (Salamanca, Spain): code 2024/07; year, 2024.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and publication of this article.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Wagle, N.S.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2023, 73, 17–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morgan, E.; Arnold, M.; Gini, A.; Lorenzoni, V.; Cabasag, C.J.; Laversanne, M.; Vignat, J.; Ferlay, J.; Murphy, N.; Bray, F. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: Incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut 2023, 72, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Morra, F.; Luise, C.; Visconti, R.; Staibano, S.; Merolla, F.; Ilardi, G.; Guggino, G.; Paladino, S.; Sarnataro, D.; Franco, R.; et al. New therapeutic perspectives in CCDC6 deficient lung cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 136, 2146–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Morra, F.; Merolla, F.; D’Abbiero, D.; Ilardi, G.; Campione, S.; Monaco, R.; Guggino, G.; Ambrosio, F.; Staibano, S.; Cerrato, A.; et al. Analysis of CCDC6 as a novel biomarker for the clinical use of PARP1 inhibitors in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2019, 135, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Morra, F.; Luise, C.; Merolla, F.; Poser, I.; Visconti, R.; Ilardi, G.; Paladino, S.; Inuzuka, H.; Guggino, G.; Monaco, R.; et al. FBXW7 and USP7 regulate CCDC6 turnover during the cell cycle and affect cancer drugs susceptibility in NSCLC. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 12697–12709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grieco, M.; Santoro, M.; Berlingieri, M.T.; Melillo, R.M.; Donghi, R.; Bongarzone, I.; Pierotti, M.A.; Della Porta, G.; Fusco, A.; Vecchio, G. PTC is a novel rearranged form of the ret proto-oncogene and is frequently detected in vivo in human thyroid papillary carcinomas. Cell 1990, 60, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cerrato, A.; Merolla, F.; Morra, F.; Celetti, A. CCDC6: The identity of a protein known to be partner in fusion. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 142, 1300–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pietrantonio, F.; Di Nicolantonio, F.; Schrock, A.B.; Lee, J.; Morano, F.; Fucà, G.; Nikolinakos, P.; Drilon, A.; Hechtman, J.F.; Christiansen, J.; et al. RET fusions in a small subset of advanced colorectal cancers at risk of being neglected. Ann. Oncol. 2018, 29, 1394–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mulkidjan, R.S.; Saitova, E.S.; Preobrazhenskaya, E.V.; Asadulaeva, K.A.; Bubnov, M.G.; Otradnova, E.A.; Terina, D.M.; Shulga, S.S.; Martynenko, D.E.; Semina, M.V.; et al. ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK1–3 gene fusions in colorectal and non-colorectal microsatellite-unstable cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kou, F.R.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.H.; Xu, T.; Qian, J.J.; Zhang, E.L.; Zhang, L.J.; Shen, L.; Wang, X.C. Analysis of actionable gene fusions in a large cohort of Chinese patients with colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2024, 12, goae092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Le Rolle, A.F.; Klempner, S.J.; Garrett, C.R.; Seery, T.; Sanford, E.M.; Balasubramanian, S.; Ross, J.S.; Stephens, P.J.; Miller, V.A.; Ali, S.M.; et al. Identification and characterization of RET fusions in advanced colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 28929–28937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pierotti, M.A.; Santoro, M.; Jenkins, R.B.; Sozzi, G.; Bongarzone, I.; Grieco, M.; Monzini, N.; Miozzo, M.; Herrmann, M.A.; Fusco, A. Characterization of an inversion on the long arm of chromosome 10 juxtaposing D10S170 and RET and creating the oncogenic sequence RET/PTC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 1616–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hamatani, K.; Eguchi, H.; Koyama, K.; Mukai, M.; Nakachi, K.; Kusunoki, Y. A novel RET rearrangement (ACBD5/RET) by pericentric inversion, inv(10)(p12.1;q11.2), in papillary thyroid cancer from an atomic bomb survivor exposed to high-dose radiation. Oncol. Rep. 2014, 32, 1809–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luise, C.; Merolla, F.; Leone, V.; Paladino, S.; Sarnataro, D.; Fusco, A.; Celetti, A. Identification of sumoylation sites in CCDC6, the first identified RET partner gene in papillary thyroid carcinoma, uncovers a mode of regulating CCDC6 function on CREB1 transcriptional activity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Merolla, F.; Luise, C.; Muller, M.T.; Pacelli, R.; Fusco, A.; Celetti, A. Loss of CCDC6, the first identified RET partner gene, affects pH2AX S139 levels and accelerates mitotic entry upon DNA damage. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Celetti, A.; Cerrato, A.; Merolla, F.; Vitagliano, D.; Vecchio, G.; Grieco, M. H4(D10S170), a gene frequently rearranged with RET in papillary thyroid carcinomas: Functional characterization. Oncogene 2004, 23, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Soung, Y.H.; Lee, J.W.; Kim, H.S.; Park, W.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Park, J.Y.; Cho, Y.G.; Kim, C.J.; Park, Y.G.; et al. Inactivating mutations of CASPASE-7 gene in human cancers. Oncogene 2003, 22, 8048–8052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Visconti, R.; Della Monica, R.; Grieco, D. Cell cycle checkpoint in cancer: A therapeutically targetable double-edged sword. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 35, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Visconti, R.; Della Monica, R.; Palazzo, L.; D’Alessio, F.; Raia, M.; Improta, S.; Villa, M.R.; Del Vecchio, L.; Grieco, D. The Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 axis affects spindle assembly checkpoint robustness and sensitivity to antimicrotubule cancer drugs. Cell Death Differ. 2015, 22, 1551–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Cerrato, A.; Morra, F.; Celetti, A. Use of poly ADP-ribose polymerase [PARP] inhibitors in cancer cells bearing DDR defects: The rationale for their inclusion in the clinic. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 35, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jinesh, G.G.; Sambandam, V.; Vijayaraghavan, S.; Balaji, K.; Mukherjee, S. Molecular genetics and cellular events of K-Ras-driven tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2018, 37, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hosoya, N.; Miyagawa, K. Targeting DNA damage response in cancer therapy. Cancer Sci. 2014, 105, 370–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Molecular characterization of the CCDC6::CASP7 rearrangement detected in a patient with aCRC by NGS. Panel (A): In the aCRC specimen, a chromosomal inversion in chromosome 10 juxtaposes the 5′ end of exon 1 of the CCDC6 gene with the 3′ end of exon 2 of the CASP7 gene, resulting in the fusion oncogene CCDC6::CASP7. The NGS results show that the rearrangement produces two different transcripts: (i) the first 95 amino acids of exon 1 of CCDC6 are fused with the first two amino acids of exon 2 of CASP7 (70% of reads), and (ii) the second transcript preserves the first 82 amino acids of exon 1 of CCDC6, and due to a deletion of a base, a frameshift occurs that allows exon 2 of CASP7 to be read correctly (30% of reads). Panel (B): Representative pictures of nuclei counterstained with DAPI (blue) and hybridized with a probe for the centromere of chromosome 10 (green spots) and a probe for the PTEN gene (red spots). All the nuclei analyzed showed a normal number of hybridization signals: two for the centromere of chromosome 10 and two for the PTEN gene.
Figure 1. Molecular characterization of the CCDC6::CASP7 rearrangement detected in a patient with aCRC by NGS. Panel (A): In the aCRC specimen, a chromosomal inversion in chromosome 10 juxtaposes the 5′ end of exon 1 of the CCDC6 gene with the 3′ end of exon 2 of the CASP7 gene, resulting in the fusion oncogene CCDC6::CASP7. The NGS results show that the rearrangement produces two different transcripts: (i) the first 95 amino acids of exon 1 of CCDC6 are fused with the first two amino acids of exon 2 of CASP7 (70% of reads), and (ii) the second transcript preserves the first 82 amino acids of exon 1 of CCDC6, and due to a deletion of a base, a frameshift occurs that allows exon 2 of CASP7 to be read correctly (30% of reads). Panel (B): Representative pictures of nuclei counterstained with DAPI (blue) and hybridized with a probe for the centromere of chromosome 10 (green spots) and a probe for the PTEN gene (red spots). All the nuclei analyzed showed a normal number of hybridization signals: two for the centromere of chromosome 10 and two for the PTEN gene.
Ijms 25 12665 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montero, J.C.; Tur, R.; Jiménez-Perez, A.; Filipovich, E.; Alcaraz, S.; Rodríguez, M.; Abad, M.; Sayagués, J.M. Identification and Characterization of a Novel CCDC6::CASP7 Gene Rearrangement in an Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patient: A Case Report. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312665

AMA Style

Montero JC, Tur R, Jiménez-Perez A, Filipovich E, Alcaraz S, Rodríguez M, Abad M, Sayagués JM. Identification and Characterization of a Novel CCDC6::CASP7 Gene Rearrangement in an Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patient: A Case Report. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(23):12665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312665

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montero, Juan Carlos, Raquel Tur, Andrea Jiménez-Perez, Elena Filipovich, Susana Alcaraz, Marta Rodríguez, Mar Abad, and José María Sayagués. 2024. "Identification and Characterization of a Novel CCDC6::CASP7 Gene Rearrangement in an Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patient: A Case Report" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 23: 12665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312665

APA Style

Montero, J. C., Tur, R., Jiménez-Perez, A., Filipovich, E., Alcaraz, S., Rodríguez, M., Abad, M., & Sayagués, J. M. (2024). Identification and Characterization of a Novel CCDC6::CASP7 Gene Rearrangement in an Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patient: A Case Report. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(23), 12665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312665

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop