Next Article in Journal
Unraveling the Role of Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain (Rheb1 and Rheb2): Bridging Neuronal Dynamics and Cancer Pathogenesis through Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Signaling
Next Article in Special Issue
Solanum lycopersicum (Tomato)-Derived Nanovesicles Accelerate Wound Healing by Eliciting the Migration of Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts
Previous Article in Journal
The Modulation of Phospho-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase and Phospho-Protein Kinase B Signaling Pathways plus Activity of Macrophage-Stimulating Protein Contribute to the Protective Effect of Stachydrine on Acetaminophen-Induced Liver Injury
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of a High-Fat Diet at a Young Age on Wound Healing in Mice
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Scarring Skin: Mechanisms and Therapies

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(3), 1458; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031458
by Xinye Lin 1,2 and Yuping Lai 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(3), 1458; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031458
Submission received: 21 December 2023 / Revised: 19 January 2024 / Accepted: 20 January 2024 / Published: 25 January 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a very nice review manuscript describing newest developments in understanding of pathophysiology of scarring, and real and potential therapeutic options. I have a very few minor comments/questions:

Paragraph on Genetic factors, starts om line 98: overexpression of TGFβ and FGF in scars is well documented (described later in this study), is there a genetic component to it, at least in some cases?

Next paragraph: Age, starts n line 115. Does hyaluronic acid (or hyaluronan) contribute to scarless healing in prenatal life and early life? Is it produce in higher amounts than in adults?

4.2. The heterogeneity of fibroblasts…: starting on line 211. Are there any biomarkers for myofibroblasts?

6. Therapeutic strategies…starts on line 328: it is advisable to mention in the first paragraph of this section that the treatment is topical, either by injections or as a cream/lotion.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Though the review is written in very good English, the authors need to go over the paper to correct minor mistakes.

 

Author Response

Reviewer 1:

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a very nice review manuscript describing newest developments in understanding of pathophysiology of scarring, and real and potential therapeutic options. I have a very few minor comments/questions:

Comment: Paragraph on Genetic factors, starts om line 98: overexpression of TGFβ and FGF in scars is well documented (described later in this study), is there a genetic component to it, at least in some cases?

Response: Thank you for the reviewer’s thoughtful suggestion. We have integrated additional evidence regarding the association between TGFβ1 gene polymorphisms or mutations and keloid development in the section on “Genetic factors”, as indicated in lines 115-120.

Comment: Next paragraph: Age, starts in line 115. Does hyaluronic acid (or hyaluronan) contribute to scarless healing in prenatal life and early life? Is it produce in higher amounts than in adults?

Response: Yes, hyaluronic acid has been suggested to contribute to scarless healing in prenatal life and early life. We have included the information on its roles in scarless healing in the “Age” section, specifically detailed in lines 159-167.

Comment: 4.2. The heterogeneity of fibroblasts…: starting on line 211. Are there any biomarkers for myofibroblasts?

Response: Yes, α-SMA is widely recognized as a biomarker for myofibroblasts. The information has been added in the “fibroblast and myofibroblasts” section, specifically at line 230.

Comment: 6. Therapeutic strategies…starts on line 328: it is advisable to mention in the first paragraph of this section that the treatment is topical, either by injections or as a cream/lotion.

Response: As the reviewer suggested, we have included the information regarding the treatment by topical application or injection. This addition can be found in the text at line 374.

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Comment: Though the review is written in very good English, the authors need to go over the paper to correct minor mistakes.

Response: We appreciate the reviewer’s feedback regarding the language. We have thoroughly reviewed the paper and corrected all the typos and misleading sentences.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors described "Scarring skin: Mechanisms and therapies" in review style. This topic should be informative for potential readers. However, there is less what is new. A lot of papers related to scarring skin and therapies have been already published (e.g. Shirakami E, et al. Burns Trauma, 2020, Lee HJ, et al. IJMS, 2019,,,). So, please add more new things to this manuscript (e.g. Figure describing interaction of molecular).

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Moderate editing of English language is required.

Author Response

Reviewer 2:

Comment: The authors described "Scarring skin: Mechanisms and therapies" in review style. This topic should be informative for potential readers. However, there is less what is new. A lot of papers related to scarring skin and therapies have been already published (e.g. Shirakami E, et al. Burns Trauma, 2020, Lee HJ, et al. IJMS, 2019,). So, please add more new things to this manuscript (e.g. Figure describing interaction of molecular).

Response: We appreciate the reviewer’s valuable input regarding the need for more recent and innovative content in the manuscript. In this revised version, we have included citations of some latest works and introduced Figure 2 to illustrate the signaling pathways involved in the induction of profibrotic gene expression. We apologize for any oversight and appreciate the opportunity to enhance the manuscript’s quality.

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Comment: Moderate editing of English language is required.

Response: We thank the reviewer for the feedback on the need for moderate editing of the English language. We have thoroughly reviewed the manuscript, corrected all the typos, and clarified any misleading sentences.

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors revised the manuscript precisely. Thank you for this opportunity.

Back to TopTop