Next Article in Journal
Identification and Expression Analysis of Putative Sugar Transporter Gene Family during Bulb Formation in Lilies
Next Article in Special Issue
Glutamate Receptor-like (GLR) Family in Brassica napus: Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Analysis in Resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Cancer Mechanisms of Diarylpentanoid MS17 (1,5-Bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)-1,4-pentadiene-3-one) in Human Colon Cancer Cells: A Proteomics Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
MoNOT3 Subunit Has Important Roles in Infection-Related Development and Stress Responses in Magnaporthe oryzae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CgNis1’s Impact on Virulence and Stress Response in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides

1
Longping Branch, College of Biology, Hunan University, Changsha 410125, China
2
Institute of Plant Protection, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
3
Yuelushan Laboratory, Changsha 410128, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(6), 3505; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063505
Submission received: 22 February 2024 / Revised: 15 March 2024 / Accepted: 18 March 2024 / Published: 20 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Plant-Fungal Interactions)

Abstract

:
Pepper anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides infection is an important fungal disease and represents a serious threat to pepper yield and quality. At present, the pathogenic molecular mechanism of C. gloeosporioides is not very clear. In our study, we characterized the function of C. gloeosporioides CgNis1, a homolog of Magnaporthe oryzae MoNis1. We found that the ∆Cgnis1 mutant reduced the growth rate and was defective in conidiation. Although the rate of appressorium formation was unaffected, the germ tube was found to be abnormal. CgNis1 was shown to be involved in the H2O2 stress response and maintaining cell membrane permeability. The pathogenicity assays performed in this study indicated that the deletion of CgNIS1 is associated with virulence. Our results indicate that CgNis1 is necessary for the growth, development, and pathogenicity of the fungus. This work provides an in-depth analysis of the Nis1 protein, helps to enhance studies on pathogen-related molecular mechanisms, and provides a theoretical basis for the prevention and control of C. gloeosporioides in peppers.

1. Introduction

Pepper anthracnose is one of the most important fungal diseases in chili production regions around the world. It is widely distributed, highly harmful, and spreads rapidly, seriously threatening the yield and quality of chili peppers [1]. The main pathogenic fungi include Colletotrichum gloeosporioides [2], Colletotrichum truncatum [3], Colletotrichum acutatum [4], Colletotrichum capsici [5], and Colletotrichum brevisporum [6]. Research has shown that there are significant differences in the dominant populations of pepper anthracnose pathogens in different regions, among which C. gloeosporioides, C. acutatum, and C. capsici are the most widely distributed pathogens of pepper anthracnose fungus [7]. In countries such as Nigeria and India, C. capsici is the main pathogenic fungus involved. C. acutatum is the main pathogen that causes anthracnose in Korean chili peppers and sweet peppers, while in the main chili-producing areas of central and southern China, the fungus C. gloeosporioides is the main dominant population that causes pepper anthracnose disease [8].
Similar to other plant pathogenic fungi, C. gloeosporioides also spreads disease through conidia infection. When the conidia of C. gloeosporioides come into contact with the host surface, their tips expand to form appressoria [9]. Once the appressoria are fully mature, huge swelling pressure accumulates inside, which generates a penetration peg through compression. The penetration peg can penetrate the host epidermis, invade the interior region of plant cells, and then, differentiate into invading hyphae, which quickly expand to the entire cell and adjacent cells, followed by the appearance of disease spots on the leaves. Under appropriate conditions, these lesions will differentiate and produce a large number of conidia, which will be released from the lesions and begin a new round of infection [10].
Currently, with the continued release of genomic data and the optimization of genetic transformation systems, research on functional genes of C. gloeosporioides has become more convenient and efficient. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways are now known to be critical for responding to various environmental signals. Research has proven that C. gloeosporioides mycelia growth, asexual improvement, pathogenicity, and the maintenance of cell wall integrity require an MAPKKK protein, CgMck1. In one study, the deletion of CgMKK1 or CgMPS1, which were downstream MAPK cascade aspects, confirmed comparable defects to the ∆Cgmck1 mutant [11]. The cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A (cAMP-PKA) pathway is concerned with the growth, improvement, and pathogenesis of phytopathogenic fungi. Inactivation of the gene that encodes the catalytic subunit of cAMP-based protein kinase A CgPKAC made C. gloeosporioides delay appressorium formation and weakened its pathogenicity [12]. As a cofactor concerned with redox reactions, copper is indispensable in the biological processes of all eukaryotes. Vacuolar copper transporter CgCTR2 silencing showed a changed C. gloeosporioides germination rate and reduced virulence, decreasing H2O2 stress tolerance [13]. These studies indicate that intracellular proteins play an exceedingly significant role in the growth, development, and pathogenesis of C. gloeosporioides, but there are few reports on the biological functions of extracellular proteins.
The innate immune system of plants is divided into two main parts: one for PTI and one for ETI (effector-triggered immunity). PTI is mediated by RLPs (receptor-like proteins), RLKs (receptor-like kinases), and RLCKs (receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase PAMPs), and they mediate regulation. In response to PTI, pathogenic fungi produce effectors. Effector proteins are defined in some articles as small secreted proteins that are cysteine-rich and have a tertiary structure stabilized by disulfide bridges ≤ 300 amino acids in size [14,15,16,17,18,19], but this is inaccurate, as in the case of the effector protein Cmu1 [20]. The absence of detectable immediate homologous proteins outside the genus has also been used to define effectors [21,22,23], and in recent years, it has been shown that some effectors are conserved across a wide range of pathogenic fungi, such as the proteins encoded by the filamentous fungal NIS1 gene. Libera suggests that any secreted fungal protein may act as an effector protein [2]. Effectors may be toxic secondary metabolites or proteins that kill the host plant, or they may be secreted proteins that protect the fungus, inhibit the host immune response, or manipulate host cell physiology [24]. For example, the effector LysM of C. gloeosporioides promotes its virulence against rubber by affecting invasive structures and suppressing chitin-triggered plant immunity, and thus, its virulence against rubber [25]. According to Irieda [26], the wide distribution of homologous effector proteins in a particular pathogen strain and the abundance of homologous effector proteins among different species can be defined as “core” effectors. NIS1 is a core effector, among which Colletotrichum orbiculare (CoNIS1), Colletotrichum higginsianum (ChNIS1), Colletotrichum tofieldiae (CtNIS1), and M. oryzae (MoNIS1) have been identified. In a study, CoNIS1, ChNIS1, and MoNIS1 were found to better inhibit INF1-induced cell death compared to CoNIS1 and ChNIS1 [26], but MoNIS1 did not induce necrotic lesions in Nicotiana benthamiana. The CoNIS1-induced programmed death of N. benthamiana cells can be inhibited by the CgDN3 homologue [27]. The deletion of NIS1 in C. orbiculare was found to have no effect on the virulence of its natural host, cucumber, but the transient expression of MoNIS1 (which does not induce necrosis in N. benthamiana) on N.benthamiana leaves followed by the inoculation of C. orbiculare revealed that MoNIS1 expression significantly enhanced C. orbiculare lesion development. This suggests a role for the conserved effector NIS1 in the virulence of C. orbiculare [26]. In addition, the disruption of NIS1-targeting genes in M. oryzae resulted in severely reduced virulence in susceptible barley and rice varieties, indicating the importance of the conserved effector NIS1 for fungal virulence [26]. CoNIS1 and MoNIS1 share an effector-mediated strategy both targeting the conserved central PRR-related kinases BAK1 and BIK1 and disrupting plant PTIs through the inhibition of their kinase activity and interference with BIK1–NADPH interactions, thereby establishing infection in the host plant [26]. BIK1–NADPH interactions disrupt plant PTI and thereby establish infection in the host plant [26]. In recent years, NIS1 has been studied mainly in Colletotrichum spp., while other pathogens have only been partially studied in the apple canker pathogen. Two NIS1-like proteins from Valsa mali, VmNIS1 and VmNIS2, play different roles in plant recognition and pathogen virulence. VmNIS1 induces programmed cell death in V. mali, whereas VmNIS2 inhibits programmed cell death in V. mali induced by INF1 [28]. VmNIS1 is a plant immune inducer, and recombinant proteins of VmNIS1 induce a ROS burst and the activation of immune-related genes in N. benthamiana, and VmNIS1 promotes plant disease resistance. VmNIS2 inhibits the flg22-triggered ROS-generated plant immune response and is required for the full virulence of V. mali, while VmNIS2 is required for the tolerance of V. mali to oxidative stress [28]. In addition, similar to CoNIS1 and MoNIS1, VmNIS1 and VmNIS2 also interact with the BAK1 co-receptor in plants. This suggests that NISI from different species may manipulate plant immunity in the same way. However, in-depth studies are needed to establish whether C. gloeosporioides has the same effect and how the NIS1 effectors affect the pathogenicity of C. gloeosporioides.
In this study, we identified an NIS1 protein of C. gloeosporioides—the CgNis1 protein. Our results indicate that CgNis1 is not only required for vegetative growth and cell membrane permeability but is also involved in conidiogenesis and pathogenicity in C. gloeosporioides.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Knockout of CgNIS1

Previous studies have shown that the absence of the MoNIS1 gene (MGG_02347) significantly reduces the virulence of rice blast fungus on rice and barley [26]. The examination of the C. gloeosporioides CSLL11 genome database revealed that a protein encoded by the gene Cghn04645 showed 31% identity and 49% similarity to the M. oryzae MoNis1. Consequently, the protein was named CgNis1. We replaced the CgNIS1-coding region with the hygromycin-resistance cassette (HPH) to generate a CgNIS1-deletion mutant. The screening of a hygromycin-resistant colony confirmed a putative knockout mutant (∆Cgnis1) through Southern blot analysis (Figure S1B). Upon introducing the CgNIS1 gene back into the ∆Cgnis1 mutant, the transformant was confirmed to have normal growth, conidiation, and infection, with the complemented strain ∆Cgnis1/CgNIS1 (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6).

2.2. CgNIS1 Deletion Affects Vegetative Growth

Initially, mutant growth was assessed on potato dextrose agar (PDA), complete medium (CM), straw decoction and corn agar (SDC), oatmeal medium (OM), and V8 juice agar (V8) plates. On PDA, CM, and SDC media, the ∆Cgnis1 mutant showed a slightly smaller colony diameter compared to the wild-type strain and the complemented strain ∆Cgnis1/CgNIS1 (Figure 1A). We counted the colony diameters on different media and analyzed the statistics using a t-test, and the analysis supported this result (Figure 1B), which indicates that CgNis1 is likely to be involved in hyphal growth.

2.3. CgNis1 Is Important in H2O2 Responses

To investigate whether the ∆Cgnis1 mutant suffers a defect during H2O2 treatment, we exposed the ∆Cgnis1 mutant strains to 2, 4, and 6 mM H2O2. The growth of ∆Cgnis1 was significantly inhibited at 2 and 4 mM H2O2 (Figure 2A,B). At 6 mM H2O2, no significant difference was observed between the ∆Cgnis1 mutant and the wild-type CSLL11 (Figure 2A,B). These results suggest that CgNis1 may be involved in the oxidative stress response.

2.4. CgNIS1 Deletion Affects Cell Membrane Permeability

A SYTOX green membrane permeabilization assay [29] was performed to determine whether CgNIS1 deletion affects the membrane integrity of C. gloeosporioides. The entire hyphae of the ∆Cgnis1 mutant were observed to display bright green fluorescence after staining with SYTOX for 30 min, while the wild-type CSLL11 and complemented strain ∆Cgnis1/CgNIS1 showed weak green fluorescence (Figure 3), which indicates that the cell membrane of the ∆Cgnis1 mutant is damaged, and a large amount of dye enters the cell.

2.5. CgNis1 Is Involved in Conidiogenesis but Not Appressorium Formation

Conidia are crucial to the process of C. gloeosporioides infection; hence, we measured the ∆Cgnis1 mutants’ conidia yield. We discovered that on CM liquid medium, the yield of conidia was greatly decreased (Figure 4A). Compared to the wild-type CSLL11 and complemented strain, the conidium yield of ∆Cgnis1/CgNIS1 was less than one-third (Figure 4C). We further investigated the formation of the appressorium in the ∆Cgnis1 mutant. We found that the ∆Cgnis1 mutant had longer germ tubes than the wild type and that it was delayed by 2 h in appressorium formation (Figure 4B,E), but the appressorium formation rate in the ∆Cgnis1 mutant was not significantly different from that in wild-type CSLL11 and the complemented strain ∆Cgnis1/CgNIS1 (Figure 4B,D). These results show that CgNis1 is essential to conidiogenesis and alters normal appressorium growth.

2.6. CgNis1 Is Required for Full Virulence

To determine whether CgNis1 is involved in pathogenicity, mycelial blocks and conidial suspensions of the ∆Cgnis1 mutant, wild-type, and complemented strains were placed on pepper and tobacco leaves. The results showed that there was a large water-soaking lesion on the leaves of the peppers 3 days after inoculation with the mycelium of wild-type and complemented strains, while the lesion area in the ∆Cgnis1 mutant strain was significantly reduced (Figure 5A). On the fifth day after spore inoculation, gray-white lesions could be observed on the leaves infected with wild-type and complemented strains, while the lesion area on the mutant was significantly lower than that on the wild type (Figure 5B). The pathogenicity of tobacco yielded similar results (Figure 6A,B). Altogether, these results suggest that CgNis1 is involved in C. gloeosporioides pathogenicity.

2.7. CgNis1 Induces Cell Necrosis

In order to verify whether the secreted protein encoded by the NIS1 gene can induce cell death, we performed a tobacco cell necrosis assay. After inoculation, the leaves of tobacco inoculated with the fusion expression protein showed watery necrotic lesions, while the control group (empty vector) showed only small signs of necrosis (Figure 7A); similar results were observed under UV light irradiation (Figure 7B). These results show that CgNis1 can induce cell death.

3. Discussion

NISI proteins are highly conserved in Colletotrichum spp.; in addition, Trichoderma arundinaceum, Trichoderma asperellum, and Fusarium albosuccineum also contain NIS1 protein (Figure S2). NIS1 was first studied in C. orbiculare (CoNIS1) [27] and proved to be the effector. Effector proteins have been demonstrated to control fungal development and growth. One example of this is the ∆PeLysM3 mutant in Penicillium expansum, which shows a somewhat slower rate of radial growth [30]. Followed by the mining of C. higginsianum (ChNIS1) through NCBI sequence comparison, C. tofieldiae (CtNIS1), and M. oryzae (MoNIS1) [26] effectors, functional studies were conducted accordingly. CgNis1 was mined based on the reported C. orbiculare NIS1 (AB669517.1) against C. gloeosporioides genome comparison. The amino acid sequences of CgNis1 and CoNis1 are highly homologous and conserved, and CgNis1 has a signaling peptide and transmembrane structural domain. Therefore, we hypothesized that CgNis1 is an effector. Our findings indicate that the NIS1 gene regulates nutrient uptake and utilization capacity, and NIS1 deletion leads to a slowdown in the mycelial growth rate of C. gloeosporioides. Furthermore, we discovered that ∆Cgnis1 mutant strains impact cell membrane integrity in addition to displaying hypersensitivity to H2O2. CoNis1 and MoNis1 inhibit fungal PAMP chitin-triggered ROS production in N. benthamiana [26], and CgNIS1 deletion in our study resulted in enhanced sensitivity to H2O2; therefore, we hypothesized that the reduced virulence of the deletion mutant might be a result of its high sensitivity to plant defense-related reactive oxygen species (ROS).
As with most fungal pathogens, the formation of conidia and appressoria plays a significant role in the infection stage. Similar to the results of CgLysM in C. gloeosporioides [25], the ∆Cgnis1 mutant showed a decrease in spore production compared with the wild type, suggesting that CgNis1 is involved in conidial formation. The appressorium formation time of the ∆Cgnis1 mutant was delayed by 2 h compared with the wild type, but the formation rate of appressorium was not affected. These results indicate that CgNis1 positively regulates conidial formation but does not affect the formation of appressorium. Whether it affects the formation of melanin and the turgor size of appressoria still needs to be further explored in the future.
It has been demonstrated in earlier research that secreted proteins affect the pathogenicity of pathogenic fungi during the infectious phase [26,31]. For example, the virulence of the apple ulcer pathogen (Valsa mali) is influenced by two Nis1-like proteins called VmNis1 and VmNis2 [28]. The secreted protein encoded by the NIS1 gene inhibits plant immunity, usually by interacting with the PRR-associated kinases Bak1 and Bik1 to inhibit their kinase activity and subsequent interaction with Bik1-NADPH oxidase [26,32,33]. It has been shown that NIS1 is preferentially expressed both during appressorium formation and during biotrophic mycelium invasion [27]. In other host–fungus interactions, the presence of diffusible pathogenic effectors to suppress host defense responses has been previously reported [34]. In our study, the sensitivity of the ∆Cgnis1 mutant to H2O2 stress may predict its role in virulence, and the fact that the ∆Cgnis1 mutant has reduced pathogenicity on healthy pepper leaves suggests that there are other potential mechanisms affecting the infection process. CgNIS1 shows a similar function to VmNIS2, both of which are required for complete virulence and tolerance to oxidative stress in C. gloeosporioides and Valsa mal pathogenic fungi, respectively. CoNIS1 and MoNIS1 manipulate plant immunity by targeting the PTI signaling-associated receptor BAK1, whereas VmNIS1 and VmNIS2 similarly interact with the BAK1 co-receptor in plants [26,28]. This implies that NISIs from different species may manipulate plant immunity in the same way, and we therefore speculate that the effects of CgNIS1 on plants may also be related to the BAK1 signaling pathway. It is unclear how the Nis1 protein interacts with the host during infection. Further in-depth examination of the infection experiment and time course of infection is required. It will be interesting to ascertain whether the infection structure’s cell-dwelling development time has somewhat changed.
Thus far, many pathogens have been identified through the A. tumefaciens-mediated transient expression system in N. thamiana [35]. A previous study revealed that the transient expression of C. orbiculare NIS1 caused necrotic formation in N. thamiana [27]. In a wide range of fungi in both Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, NIS1 has a conserved function that targets the key kinases BAK1/SERK3 and BIK1, which are indispensable for plant pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) [26,32,36,37,38,39,40]. This is consistent with our study; therefore, we speculate that the NIS1 gene may act as an effector protein to interfere with the immune response of plants. Other fungus effector proteins play various roles in some pathogenicity-related physiological processes. However, INF1-induced allergic response (HR) cell death was reduced by the NIS1 homologues of C. orbiculare, C. higginsianum, and M. oryzae [26]. These findings imply that Nis1 functions differently in various strains. In addition to the widely utilized N. benthamiana, it will be crucial to build additional transient expression systems in matching host plants for a deeper understanding of the effector function of plant diseases.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Strains and Culture Conditions

The wild type used in this study is the C. gloeosporioides strain CSLL1. CSLL-11 was isolated from anthracnose-affected plants of chili peppers in Changsha, Hunan Province. CSLL11 grows well at temperatures of 25–28 °C and colonies appear as white aerial mycelium. CSLL11 lesions on chili fruits appear as black round depressions or necrosis. All strains were incubated on PDA medium plates in the dark at 28 °C. Liquid CM medium was used to harvest fungal mycelia at 28 °C and 200 rpm, and was used to extract genomic DNA and RNA. The protoplast preparation and transformation processes followed those of Sweigard et al. (1992) [41]. Transformants were selected on media with 400 µg/mL hygromycin B (Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) or 400 µg/mL G418 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in TB3 medium.

4.2. CgNIS1 Gene Disruption and ∆Cgnis1 Mutant Complementation

For the generation of the CgNIS1 gene replacement constructs, we used the ligation PCR approach [42]. Primer pairs NIS1-UP-F+/NIS1-UP-R+ and NIS1-DOWN-F+/NIS1-DOWN-R+ (Table S1) were designed to amplify the sequences of the CgNIS1 gene approximately 1 kb upstream and downstream by means of PCR. Digestion resulted in PCR products which were amplified by NIS1-UP-F+/NIS1-UP-R+ and NIS1-DOWN-F+/NIS1-DOWN-R+ primer pairs and separately with XhoI/SalI and SpeI/NotI and purified afterward for ligation to the vector pCX62. We transformed the CgNIS1 gene replacement constructs into CSLL11 protoplasts. The method used to initially identify putative ∆Cgnis1 mutants was PCR, and Southern blot analysis was used to further confirm the changes. To generate the complementation strain, the full length of the CgNIS1 gene was amplified, which contained the native promoter, and we used the digestion–ligation method to clone into the geneticin-resistant vector pGTN and transformed it into the ∆Cgnis1 mutant. PCR amplification verification was used to obtain CgNIS1 gene complement transformants.

4.3. Southern Blotting

The Southern blot protocol was utilized under the standard protocol [43]. The probes used for Southern blotting were the target gene probe and the HPH probe that were amplified with the primer pairs NIS1-F/NIS1-R (for CgNIS1) (Table S1) and HPH-F/HPH-R (for HPH), respectively. The DIG High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter Kit (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) was used for probe labeling, hybridization, and detection.

4.4. Vegetative Growth, Stress Response, and Cell Membrane Permeability

The vegetative growth of ∆Cgnis1, complement strains, and CSLL11 was measured on PDA, CM, OM, SDC, and V8 media for 5 days. Five-day-old mycelia plugs of the same size were cultured in CM liquid for 3 days, with 200 rpm shaking at 28 °C. All growth assays were repeated three times, with three replicates on each occasion.
To determine the effects on the fungal growth of H2O2, we prepared H2O2 plates with different concentrations by adding different amounts of H2O2 solution to the melted PDA medium. Mycelia plugs of the size, 5 mm × 5 mm, were transferred onto the above-mentioned plates and cultured in the dark at 28 °C. Colony size measurements and photographs were taken after 4 days of incubation [40]. The inhibition rate was determined by the percentage decrease in colony diameter [44]. The experiment was repeated three times with three replicates on each occasion.
Fungal hyphae were added to 20 µL of 10 µm of SYTOX green nucleic acid stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), reacted at 37 °C in the dark for 30 min, and washed twice with sterile water, and then, the hyphae were observed using a confocal fluorescence microscope, and photographs were taken to record the results.

4.5. Conidiation and Appressorium Formation

For conidiation, equal volumes of mycelium were incubated for three days at 28 °C and 200 rpm in a 100 mL CM liquid medium. The mixture was then filtered through a 3-layer filter, and 20 µL of the conidial suspension was counted under a microscope using a hemocytometer. To measure the formation of appressoria and conidial germination on a hydrophobic surface, 20 µL conidial suspension (5 × 104 cfu/mL) was dropped onto the surface and placed in a moistened box at 25 °C. The rate of appressorium formation was determined using a microscope at 12 hours post inoculation (hpi), with more than 200 appressoria counted for each strain. Photographs were taken at 12 hpi.

4.6. Pathogenicity Analysis of the Gene Knockout Mutants

The tobacco and pepper seeds were sown in advance and cultivated to the 4–6-leaf stage in a greenhouse. Leaves of the same age were selected as test materials. A round mycelium block of the same size and 20 µL spore (5 × 104 cfu/mL) of CSLL11, ∆Cgnis1, and complement strains were placed on the leaves and incubated for 3 days (mycelium) and 5 days (conidia) at 28 °C in a dark incubator, and then, photographs were taken to record the results.

4.7. CgNis1 Induces Cell Necrosis

The cDNA sequence of the CgNIS1 gene was amplified via PCR with the primer pairs NIS1-GFP-F/NIS1-GFP-R and digested with KpnI/SmaI, and then, purified and ligated to the vector pBin::eGFP. The connecting vector plasmid was transferred into A. tumefaciens GV3101 via electric shock transformation. The A. tumefaciens-inoculating buffer containing pBin::CgNIS1::eGFP (treatment group) and the pBin::eGFP (control group) plasmid were injected into the 3-week-old tobacco leaves. After being placed under white light for 1 h, the cultures were switched to darkness for 42 h, after which photographs were taken, and we made a record of the size of the spot.

4.8. Statistical Analyses

All biotechnological experiments were repeated thrice using three independent biological replicates. The data were expressed as means ± SD. Shapiro–Wilk was used to analyze the normality among the groups, followed by t-test for evaluation. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 21. p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

5. Conclusions

C. gloeosporioides can infest a variety of hosts, including chili peppers [45], bananas [46], strawberries [47], and rubber trees [48]. In this study, we preliminarily investigated the effects of CgNIS1 on the growth, development, and virulence of C. gloeosporioides. We created an ∆Cgnis1 mutant and identified its biological function. The study findings showed that the deletion of CgNIS1 led to a reduction in hyphal growth rate, conidia yield, and virulence, increased susceptibility to H2O2, affected appressorium germ tube length, and disrupted cell membrane integration. In conclusion, this research aided in revealing the pleiotropic role of NIS1 in the control of growth and development as well as pathogen virulence. NIS1 is a core effector that targets PAMP recognition and signaling mechanisms, and these mechanisms may be generally conserved in higher plants [26]. Therefore, we used CgNIS1 as an entry point to lay the foundation for the recognition mechanism of C. gloeosporioides and the host plant, as well as to provide targets for resistance breeding and the development of novel drugs for the prevention and control of C. gloeosporioides.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25063505/s1.

Author Contributions

Y.C. and X.T. designed the research plan; S.G., Q.S., S.L., F.W., C.L., X.Z., C.O. and Y.C. performed the research and analyzed the data; S.G., Q.S. and Y.C. wrote the paper; Y.C. and X.T. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U22A20462 and 31972223).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to Natural Science Foundation of China for providing generous funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ridzuan, R.; Rafii, M.Y.; Ismail, S.I.; Mohammad Yusoff, M.; Miah, G.; Usman, M. Breeding for Anthracnose Disease Resistance in Chili: Progress and Prospects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Man, Y.; Liu, S.; Ouyang, C.; Li, C.; Wu, X.; Zhang, D.; Liu, Y.; Tan, X. Simple sequence repeat markers reflect the biological phenotype differentiation and genetic diversity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides strains from Capsicum annuum L. in China. J. Phytopathol. 2021, 169, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Naveen, J.; Navya, H.M.; Hithamani, G.; Hariprasad, P.; Niranjana, S.R. Pathological, biochemical and molecular variability of Colletotrichum truncatum incitant of anthracnose disease in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Microb. Pathog. 2021, 152, 104611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ali, M.; Li, Q.H.; Zou, T.; Wei, A.M.; Gombojab, G.; Lu, G.; Gong, Z.H. Chitinase Gene Positively Regulates Hypersensitive and Defense Responses of Pepper to Colletotrichum acutatum Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lee, J.; Do, J.W.; Yoon, J.B. Development of STS markers linked to the major QTLs for resistance to the pepper anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum acutatum and C. capsici. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2011, 52, 596–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Villafana, R.T.; Ramdass, A.C.; Rampersad, S.N. Colletotrichum brevisporum is associated with anthracnose of red bell pepper fruit in Trinidad. New Dis. Rep. 2019, 39, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Than, P.P.; Prihastuti, H.; Phoulivong, S.; Taylor, P.W.; Hyde, K.D. Chilli anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum species. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2008, 9, 764–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Diao, Y.Z.; Zhang, C.; Liu, F.; Wang, W.Z.; Liu, L.; Cai, L.; Liu, X.L. Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose disease of chili in China. Persoonia 2017, 38, 20–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kim, Y.K.; Li, D.; Kolattukudy, P.E. Induction of Ca2+-calmodulin signaling by hard-surface contact primes Colletotrichum gloeosporioides conidia to germinate and form appressoria. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 5144–5150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Silva, D.D.; Crous, P.W.; Ades, P.K.; Hyde, K.D.; Taylor, P.W.J. Life styles of Colletotrichum species and implications for plant biosecurity. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017, 31, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fang, Y.L.; Xia, L.M.; Wang, P.; Zhu, L.H.; Ye, J.R.; Huang, L. The MAPKKK CgMck1 Is Required for Cell Wall Integrity, Appressorium Development, and Pathogenicity in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Genes 2018, 9, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Priyatno, T.P.; Abu Bakar, F.D.; Kamaruddin, N.; Mahadi, N.M.; Abdul Murad, A.M. Inactivation of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A causes delayed appressorium formation and reduced pathogenicity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 545784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Barhoom, S.; Kupiec, M.; Zhao, X.; Xu, J.R.; Sharon, A. Functional characterization of CgCTR2, a putative vacuole copper transporter that is involved in germination and pathogenicity in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Eukaryot. Cell 2008, 7, 1098–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Duplessis, S.; Cuomo, C.A.; Lin, Y.C.; Aerts, A.; Tisserant, E.; Veneault-Fourrey, C.; Joly, D.L.; Hacquard, S.; Amselem, J.; Cantarel, B.L.; et al. Obligate biotrophy features unraveled by the genomic analysis of rust fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 9166–9171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gan, P.; Ikeda, K.; Irieda, H.; Narusaka, M.; O’Connell, R.J.; Narusaka, Y.; Takano, Y.; Kubo, Y.; Shirasu, K. Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal the hemibiotrophic stage shift of Colletotrichum fungi. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 1236–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martin, F.; Aerts, A.; Ahrén, D.; Brun, A.; Danchin, E.G.; Duchaussoy, F.; Gibon, J.; Kohler, A.; Lindquist, E.; Pereda, V.; et al. The genome of Laccaria bicolor provides insights into mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nature 2008, 452, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Martin, F.; Kohler, A.; Murat, C.; Balestrini, R.; Coutinho, P.M.; Jaillon, O.; Montanini, B.; Morin, E.; Noel, B.; Percudani, R.; et al. Périgord black truffle genome uncovers evolutionary origins and mechanisms of symbiosis. Nature 2010, 464, 1033–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Stergiopoulos, I.; Collemare, J.; Mehrabi, R.; De Wit, P.J. Phytotoxic secondary metabolites and peptides produced by plant pathogenic Dothideomycete fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 67–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zuccaro, A.; Lahrmann, U.; Güldener, U.; Langen, G.; Pfiffi, S.; Biedenkopf, D.; Wong, P.; Samans, B.; Grimm, C.; Basiewicz, M.; et al. Endophytic life strategies decoded by genome and transcriptome analyses of the mutualistic root symbiont Piriformospora indica. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Djamei, A.; Schipper, K.; Rabe, F.; Ghosh, A.; Vincon, V.; Kahnt, J.; Osorio, S.; Tohge, T.; Fernie, A.R.; Feussner, I.; et al. Metabolic priming by a secreted fungal effector. Nature 2011, 478, 395–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. O’Connell, R.J.; Thon, M.R.; Hacquard, S.; Amyotte, S.G.; Kleemann, J.; Torres, M.F.; Damm, U.; Buiate, E.A.; Epstein, L.; Alkan, N.; et al. Lifestyle transitions in plant pathogenic Colletotrichum fungi deciphered by genome and transcriptome analyses. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 1060–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Spanu, P.D.; Abbott, J.C.; Amselem, J.; Burgis, T.A.; Soanes, D.M.; Stüber, K.; Ver Loren van Themaat, E.; Brown, J.K.; Butcher, S.A.; Gurr, S.J.; et al. Genome expansion and gene loss in powdery mildew fungi reveal tradeoffs in extreme parasitism. Science 2010, 330, 1543–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wicker, T.; Oberhaensli, S.; Parlange, F.; Buchmann, J.P.; Shatalina, M.; Roffler, S.; Ben-David, R.; Doležel, J.; Šimková, H.; Schulze-Lefert, P.; et al. The wheat powdery mildew genome shows the unique evolution of an obligate biotroph. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1092–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lo Presti, L.; Lanver, D.; Schweizer, G.; Tanaka, S.; Liang, L.; Tollot, M.; Zuccaro, A.; Reissmann, S.; Kahmann, R. Fungal effectors and plant susceptibility. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2015, 66, 513–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, L.; Liao, Z.; Feng, L.; An, B.; He, C.; Wang, Q.; Luo, H. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Cg2LysM contributed to virulence toward rubber tree through affecting invasive structure and inhibiting chitin-triggered plant immunity. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1129101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Irieda, H.; Inoue, Y.; Mori, M.; Yamada, K.; Oshikawa, Y.; Saitoh, H.; Uemura, A.; Terauchi, R.; Kitakura, S.; Kosaka, A.; et al. Conserved fungal effector suppresses PAMP-triggered immunity by targeting plant immune kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 496–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yoshino, K.; Irieda, H.; Sugimoto, F.; Yoshioka, H.; Okuno, T.; Takano, Y. Cell death of Nicotiana benthamiana is induced by secreted protein NIS1 of Colletotrichum orbiculare and is suppressed by a homologue of CgDN3. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 625–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nie, J.; Zhou, W.; Lin, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yin, Z.; Huang, L. Two NIS1-like proteins from apple canker pathogen (Valsa mali) play distinct roles in plant recognition and pathogen virulence. Stress Biol. 2022, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Farkas, A.; Maróti, G.; Durgő, H.; Györgypál, Z.; Lima, R.M.; Medzihradszky, K.F.; Kereszt, A.; Mergaert, P.; Kondorosi, É. Medicago truncatula symbiotic peptide NCR247 contributes to bacteroid differentiation through multiple mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 5183–5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Levin, E.; Ballester, A.R.; Raphael, G.; Feigenberg, O.; Liu, Y.; Norelli, J.; Gonzalez-Candelas, L.; Ma, J.; Dardick, C.; Wisniewski, M.; et al. Identification and characterization of LysM effectors in Penicillium expansum. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Monaghan, J.; Zipfel, C. Plant pattern recognition receptor complexes at the plasma membrane. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, L.; Li, M.; Yu, L.; Zhou, Z.; Liang, X.; Liu, Z.; Cai, G.; Gao, L.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; et al. The FLS2-associated kinase BIK1 directly phosphorylates the NADPH oxidase RbohD to control plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe 2014, 15, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Takano, Y.; Komeda, K.; Kojima, K.; Okuno, T. Proper regulation of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase is required for growth, conidiation, and appressorium function in the anthracnose fungus Colletotrichum lagenarium. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2001, 14, 1149–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Li, H.; Bao, Y.; Duan, Z.; Wang, C.; Powell, C.A.; Wang, K.; Hu, Q.; Chen, B.; et al. Identification of common fungal extracellular membrane (CFEM) proteins in Fusarium sacchari that inhibit plant immunity and contribute to virulence. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0145223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ali, S.; Magne, M.; Chen, S.; Côté, O.; Stare, B.G.; Obradovic, N.; Jamshaid, L.; Wang, X.; Bélair, G.; Moffett, P. Analysis of putative apoplastic effectors from the nematode, Globodera rostochiensis, and identification of an expansin-like protein that can induce and suppress host defenses. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0115042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Xiang, T.; Liu, Z.; Laluk, K.; Ding, X.; Zou, Y.; Gao, M.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S.; et al. Receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases integrate signaling from multiple plant immune receptors and are targeted by a Pseudomonas syringae effector. Cell Host Microbe 2010, 7, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shan, L.; He, P.; Li, J.; Heese, A.; Peck, S.C.; Nürnberger, T.; Martin, G.B.; Sheen, J. Bacterial effectors target the common signaling partner BAK1 to disrupt multiple MAMP receptor-signaling complexes and impede plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe 2008, 4, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhou, J.; Wu, S.; Chen, X.; Liu, C.; Sheen, J.; Shan, L.; He, P. The Pseudomonas syringae effector HopF2 suppresses Arabidopsis immunity by targeting BAK1. Plant J. 2014, 77, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Feng, F.; Yang, F.; Rong, W.; Wu, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, S.; He, C.; Zhou, J.M. A Xanthomonas uridine 5′-monophosphate transferase inhibits plant immune kinases. Nature 2012, 485, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roux, M.; Schwessinger, B.; Albrecht, C.; Chinchilla, D.; Jones, A.; Holton, N.; Malinovsky, F.G.; Tör, M.; de Vries, S.; Zipfel, C. The Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases BAK1/SERK3 and BKK1/SERK4 are required for innate immunity to hemibiotrophic and biotrophic pathogens. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2440–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sweigard, J.A.; Chumley, F.G.; Valent, B. Disruption of a Magnaporthe grisea cutinase gene. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1992, 232, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhao, X.; Xue, C.; Kim, Y.; Xu, J.-R. A Ligation-PCR Approach for Generating Gene Replacement Constructs in Magnaporthe grisea. Fungal Genet. Rep. 2004, 51, 17–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sambrook, J.F.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. (Eds.) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Q.; Guo, X.; Guo, M.; Qi, Z.; Tang, W.; Dong, Y.; Ye, W.; Zheng, X.; Wang, P.; et al. Pleiotropic function of the putative zinc-finger protein MoMsn2 in Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 446–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, Y.; Ma, X.; Gai, W.; Xiao, L.; Gong, Z. First Report of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Causing Anthracnose on Pepper in Shaanxi Province, China. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Alam, M.W.; Malik, A.; Rehman, A.; Hameed, A.; Sarwar, M.; Hussain, M.; Hussain, D.; Shafeeq, T. First Record of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Causing Anthracnose of Banana in Pakistan. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Oliveira, M.S.; Wang, N.Y.; Peres, N.A. Multilocus Phylogenetic Analyses of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Species Complex Causing Crown Rot on Strawberry in Florida. Phytopathology 2022, 112, 898–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liang, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, Y.; Yin, H.; An, B.; Lin, D.; He, C.; Luo, H. CgNPG1 as a Novel Pathogenic Gene of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides from Hevea brasiliensis in Mycelial Growth, Conidiation, and the Invasive Structures Development. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 629387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Comparison of mutants and wild-type strains in growth. (A) The wild-type, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains were inoculated on PDA, CM, SDC, OM, and V8 plates and cultured at 28 °C in darkness for 5 days. (B) Statistical results of colony diameter of the wild-type, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains. Standard deviations are represented by error bars. Error bars represent ± SD of three replicates, and asterisks (**) indicate significant difference (t-test p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Comparison of mutants and wild-type strains in growth. (A) The wild-type, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains were inoculated on PDA, CM, SDC, OM, and V8 plates and cultured at 28 °C in darkness for 5 days. (B) Statistical results of colony diameter of the wild-type, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains. Standard deviations are represented by error bars. Error bars represent ± SD of three replicates, and asterisks (**) indicate significant difference (t-test p < 0.01).
Ijms 25 03505 g001
Figure 2. H2O2 stress assessment of the ∆Cgnis1 mutants. (A) The ∆Cgnis1 mutants are relatively less sensitive to H2O2 stress than wild-type CSLL11. Colonies of wild-type CSLL11, ∆Cgnis1 mutants, and complemented strains were grown on PDA plates with 2, 4, and 6 mM H2O2 and cultured at 28 °C for 4 days. (B) The growth inhibition rate was evaluated relative to the growth rate of each untreated control (inhibition rate = (diameter of untreated strain − diameter of treated strain)/(diameter of untreated strain × 100%)). Similar results were obtained after three repetitions of the procedure. Error bars represent ± SD of three replicates, and asterisks (**) indicate significant difference (t-test p < 0.01).
Figure 2. H2O2 stress assessment of the ∆Cgnis1 mutants. (A) The ∆Cgnis1 mutants are relatively less sensitive to H2O2 stress than wild-type CSLL11. Colonies of wild-type CSLL11, ∆Cgnis1 mutants, and complemented strains were grown on PDA plates with 2, 4, and 6 mM H2O2 and cultured at 28 °C for 4 days. (B) The growth inhibition rate was evaluated relative to the growth rate of each untreated control (inhibition rate = (diameter of untreated strain − diameter of treated strain)/(diameter of untreated strain × 100%)). Similar results were obtained after three repetitions of the procedure. Error bars represent ± SD of three replicates, and asterisks (**) indicate significant difference (t-test p < 0.01).
Ijms 25 03505 g002
Figure 3. Experimental results of the membrane permeability test on the ∆Cgnis1 mutant. Approximately 10 µm SYTOX green nucleic acid staining agent was dripped onto the mycelium for 30 min at 37 °C; it was then washed twice with sterile water, and the mycelial fluorescence was observed using a confocal fluorescence microscope and photographed to record the results.
Figure 3. Experimental results of the membrane permeability test on the ∆Cgnis1 mutant. Approximately 10 µm SYTOX green nucleic acid staining agent was dripped onto the mycelium for 30 min at 37 °C; it was then washed twice with sterile water, and the mycelial fluorescence was observed using a confocal fluorescence microscope and photographed to record the results.
Ijms 25 03505 g003
Figure 4. CgNis1 is required for conidiation. (A) Strains were incubated in CM liquid for 3 days to collect conidia for observation under a light microscope. Microscopic images taken at ×20 magnification. (B) Morphological observations of appressorium formation. Microscopic images taken at ×40 magnification. (C) Statistics on conidial formation quantity (n = 10). (D) Statistics on appressorium formation rate. We counted 100 germinating conidia. (E) Statistics on germ tube length. Similar results were obtained after three repetitions of the procedure. Error bars represent ± SD of three replicates, and asterisks (**) indicate significant difference (t-test, p < 0.01).
Figure 4. CgNis1 is required for conidiation. (A) Strains were incubated in CM liquid for 3 days to collect conidia for observation under a light microscope. Microscopic images taken at ×20 magnification. (B) Morphological observations of appressorium formation. Microscopic images taken at ×40 magnification. (C) Statistics on conidial formation quantity (n = 10). (D) Statistics on appressorium formation rate. We counted 100 germinating conidia. (E) Statistics on germ tube length. Similar results were obtained after three repetitions of the procedure. Error bars represent ± SD of three replicates, and asterisks (**) indicate significant difference (t-test, p < 0.01).
Ijms 25 03505 g004
Figure 5. Pathogenicity of the ∆Cgnis1 mutant on pepper leaves. (A) Inoculated round mycelium block of the wild-type CSLL11, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains on pepper leaves pictured after 3 days. (B) Inoculated conidia of the wild-type CSLL11, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains on the pepper leaves observed after 5 days. UV, ultraviolet light.
Figure 5. Pathogenicity of the ∆Cgnis1 mutant on pepper leaves. (A) Inoculated round mycelium block of the wild-type CSLL11, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains on pepper leaves pictured after 3 days. (B) Inoculated conidia of the wild-type CSLL11, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains on the pepper leaves observed after 5 days. UV, ultraviolet light.
Ijms 25 03505 g005
Figure 6. Pathogenicity of the ∆Cgnis1 mutant on tobacco leaves. (A) Inoculated round mycelium block of the wild-type CSLL11, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains on the tobacco leaves observed after 3 days. (B) Inoculated conidia of the wild-type CSLL11, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains on the tobacco leaves after 5 days. UV, ultraviolet light.
Figure 6. Pathogenicity of the ∆Cgnis1 mutant on tobacco leaves. (A) Inoculated round mycelium block of the wild-type CSLL11, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains on the tobacco leaves observed after 3 days. (B) Inoculated conidia of the wild-type CSLL11, ∆Cgnis1 mutant, and complementation strains on the tobacco leaves after 5 days. UV, ultraviolet light.
Ijms 25 03505 g006
Figure 7. Nis1 induces plant cell death. (A,B) This picture was taken 42 h after the inoculation of N. benthamiana. The left side of the leaves was inoculated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing the empty vector as the control, and the right side was inoculated with A. tumefaciens containing the fusion expression vector pBin::CgNIS1::eGFP as the treatment group. (A) The picture under white light. (B) The picture under ultraviolet light.
Figure 7. Nis1 induces plant cell death. (A,B) This picture was taken 42 h after the inoculation of N. benthamiana. The left side of the leaves was inoculated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing the empty vector as the control, and the right side was inoculated with A. tumefaciens containing the fusion expression vector pBin::CgNIS1::eGFP as the treatment group. (A) The picture under white light. (B) The picture under ultraviolet light.
Ijms 25 03505 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, S.; Sun, Q.; Liu, S.; Wu, F.; Li, C.; Zhang, X.; OuYang, C.; Chen, Y.; Tan, X. CgNis1’s Impact on Virulence and Stress Response in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3505. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063505

AMA Style

Guo S, Sun Q, Liu S, Wu F, Li C, Zhang X, OuYang C, Chen Y, Tan X. CgNis1’s Impact on Virulence and Stress Response in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(6):3505. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063505

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Sheng, Qianlong Sun, Sizhen Liu, Fei Wu, Chenggang Li, Xin Zhang, Chao OuYang, Yue Chen, and Xinqiu Tan. 2024. "CgNis1’s Impact on Virulence and Stress Response in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 6: 3505. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063505

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop