Next Article in Journal
Potential Therapeutic Appliances of Dietary Polyphenols: Resveratrol and Curcumin in Treatment of Gliomas
Previous Article in Journal
Potential Molecular Biomarkers of Preeclampsia—A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Characterization of DrRALF Genes in Yam (Dioscorea rotundata) Reveals Their Potential Roles in Tuber Expansion and the Gibberellin Response

1
Key Laboratory of Mountain Biodiversity Conservation, Education Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Yulin Normal University, Yulin 537000, China
2
National Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
3
College of Plant Sciences, Tibet Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi 860000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(13), 6151; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136151
Submission received: 24 April 2025 / Revised: 23 June 2025 / Accepted: 24 June 2025 / Published: 26 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

Yam (Dioscorea spp.) provides various nutritional and medicinal benefits, including a high starch content, dietary fiber, essential micronutrients, and bioactive compounds. The molecular mechanisms underlying tuber expansion have not yet been clarified. Rapid alkalinization factor (RALF) genes, which mediate various processes in plants, are thought to contribute to the regulation of tuber growth; however, their role in yam development, especially in gibberellin (GA)-mediated processes, remains unclear. Here, we characterized seven DrRALF genes in the yam genome. Analysis of gene duplication demonstrated that the expansion of DrRALF genes was primarily driven by whole-genome duplication or segmental duplication. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that DrRALF genes were concentrated in specific clusters, indicating that their functions are relatively conserved. DrRALF5 was specifically expressed in the roots, and DrRALF2, DrRALF3, DrRALF4, and DrRALF6 were highly expressed in flowers. DrRALF1, DrRALF2, DrRALF3, DrRALF4, DrRALF5, and DrRALF6 were shown to play a role in tuber expansion. Subsequent qRT-PCR validation of four selected DrRALF genes confirmed the regulation of DrRALF2, DrRALF4, DrRALF5, and DrRALF6 by GA and PP333 (paclobutrazol, a GA biosynthesis inhibitor). Yeast one-hybrid assays further showed that the DrRALF6 promoter region interacted with the GA-signaling protein, DrDELLA1. Our findings provide novel insights into the regulatory network controlling yam tuber expansion, especially through the interaction between DrRALF6 and GA signaling pathways. Our results clarify the molecular mechanisms involved in tuber growth and propose a promising strategy for improving yam production through genetic manipulation of the GA-RALF signaling pathway.

1. Introduction

Yam (Dioscorea spp.) is a monocotyledonous tuber crop, and over 600 species have been described in the genus Dioscorea. Among tuber crops, yam ranks fourth in terms of global production volume, following Solanum tuberosum (potato), Manihot esculenta (cassava), and Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato), and it contributes approximately 10% to the total global production of roots and tubers [1]. In addition to its richness in starch, sugars, essential minerals, proteins, and vitamins, yam tubers also serve as a significant source of secondary metabolites, including steroidal saponins, diterpenoids, and alkaloids. Yam thus serves as a vital food source as well as an important medicinal crop [2,3]. The growth and expansion of yam tubers are key determinants of overall yield and also influence physical attributes such as tuber size and texture; clarifying the regulatory mechanisms underlying tuber expansion is thus essential for enhancing yam production and quality. Plant hormones, especially gibberellins (GAs), are critically important for regulating tuber expansion. GAs affect tuber growth and development through both direct and indirect mechanisms, including the regulation of cell elongation, division, and carbohydrate metabolism [4,5,6,7,8]. Previous studies indicate that GAs play a complex and stage-dependent role in tuber development. For example, GAs have been shown to negatively regulate the tuber expansion process, as the exogenous application of GA4/7 promotes stolon elongation and delays tuber formation [9]. In Jerusalem artichoke, GA3 levels are higher before tuber formation, which supports stolon growth, but decrease during tuber growth, and GA3 is negatively correlated with dry matter and sugar accumulation in tubers [10]. The exogenous application of GA increases the yield of yam tubers and promotes the formation of axillary bulbils [6,11]. The “GA-GID1-DELLA” signaling pathway, in which the DELLA protein serves as the central hub, is the currently recognized GA signaling pathway [12,13]. Tuber initiation in yam is regulated by the GA-GID1-DELLA module [6,14].
Rapid alkalinization factors (RALFs) are small, secreted cysteine-rich peptides found across various plant species. They induce rapid alkalinization in tobacco suspension cell cultures [15]. RALF members interact with various receptor protein kinases to regulate numerous biological processes, including plant growth, flowering, fruit maturation, and stress responses. Previous studies of Arabidopsis have demonstrated that AtRALF regulates plant growth by regulating cell proliferation and plays key roles in root, pollen tube, and fruit development [16,17,18,19,20,21]. RALFs have also been shown to be involved in pollen maturation in broccoli and Primula vulgaris [22,23]. In rubber trees, HbRALF3 and HbRALF19 regulate latex metabolism by affecting the pH of rubber latex [24]. In Solanum chacoense, fruit development and maturation are closely associated with RALFs, and ScRALF3 silencing decreases seed production [25,26]. In legumes, seven GmRALFs are likely responsible for the release of rhizobia from cortical cells, indicating that they mediate nodule formation [27]. Although the roles of RALF peptides in regulating key developmental processes across diverse plant species are well-established, RALF peptides in yam (Dioscorea spp.) have not yet been functionally characterized. Given that yam is a nutritionally and medicinally important tuber crop, elucidating the regulatory functions of RALF peptides in tuber expansion is crucial for enhancing our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of tuber development. Moreover, investigating the potential interplay between RALF-mediated pathways and gibberellin signaling may reveal novel regulatory nodes that govern tuber growth. These insights not only address a critical knowledge gap but also lay the groundwork for precision breeding strategies aimed at enhancing yam yield, quality, and stress resilience, which can ultimately contribute to sustainable agriculture and global food security.
Here, we identified RALF genes in yam by performing BLASTP (TBtools v1.108) searches against the yam genome and analyzed their potential functions in yam growth and development, including during tuber expansion. We also explored interactions between RALF family members and the GA signaling pathway. A visual summary of the experimental design and analytical pipeline is provided in Supplementary Figure S1. Our findings enhance our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of RALF genes in yam tuber expansion, which may have implications for the development of strategies to enhance yam yield and quality and studies on hormonal regulation in other tuber crops. The primary aim of this study was to identify and characterize RALF genes in yam (Dioscorea rotundata) at the genome-wide level and explore their expression patterns during tuber development and in different plant tissues to provide preliminary insights into their potential roles in growth and development.

2. Results

2.1. Genomic Analysis of DrRALFs

RALF genes in yam were identified using a bidirectional BLAST strategy. AtRALF sequences were used as query sequences against the Dioscorea genome, which yielded seven candidate genes (Table 1). These candidate genes were subsequently validated through comparison with the SwissProt protein database, which confirmed that all seven candidates were RALF genes.
The seven identified genes were mapped to five chromosomes in the yam genome (Table 1 and Figure 1); based on their chromosomal locations, they were named DrRALF1 to DrRALF7. Protein parameters of the seven DrRALFs were predicted by Protein Parameter Calc. The DrRALF protein precursors comprised 106–128 amino acids, with molecular weights between 11.63 and 14.31 kDa. The theoretical isoelectric points (pI) of the proteins ranged from 6.55 to 9.83, which corresponds to the pH at which the protein carries no net charge [28]. Most DrRALFs were found to be hydrophilic, with GRAVY values ranging from −0.596 (DrRALF2) to 0.029 (DrRALF1); negative values were observed for most proteins, suggesting they were predominantly hydrophilic (Table 2). The seven DrRALF protein precursors all contained signal peptides; five of them contained a conserved Arg-Arg (RR) motif, which was used as the cleavage site for site-1 protease (S1P). The mature DrRALF peptides consistently featured a conserved RGC(5N)C motif at the C-terminus. Additionally, five DrRALFs displayed a conserved YISY motif at the N-terminus, except for DrRALF2 and DrRALF5. The RCRR motif was highly diverse among DrRALF proteins (Figure 2).
We analyzed the duplication events of DrRALFs to investigate their evolutionary relationships. The results indicate that DrRALF4/5/6 arose from whole-genome duplication (WGD) or segmental duplication, DrRALF3/7 underwent dispersed duplication events, and DrRALF1/2 are singletons (Supplementary Table S4).
A phylogenetic analysis was performed on DrRALFs as well as Arabidopsis RALFs. The RALF sequences were classified into four distinct clades, which were denoted as I, II, III, and IV, comprising 15, 9, 14, and 5 members, respectively. The DrRALFs were predominantly clustered in clade III, comprising six members, and clade II contained only a single DrRALF. Notably, no DrRALFs were identified in clades I and IV. Furthermore, a paralogous gene cluster (DrRALF4/5/6) was identified, which has been previously characterized to arise from WGD or segmental duplication events. In addition, the phylogenetic proximity between DrRALF3 and RALF34, as well as that between DrRALF2 and RALF32, indicates that these pairs are likely orthologous genes (Figure 3).

2.2. Cis-Acting Element Analyses of Yam DrRALFs

The 2000 bp upstream promoter sequences of DrRALFs were retrieved from the yam genome, and their cis-regulatory elements were analyzed using the PlantCARE database, which allows their regulatory potential to be determined (Supplementary Table S1 and Figure 4). Cis-regulatory elements associated with plant hormone responsiveness were extensively distributed throughout the promoter regions of DrRALFs (Figure 4). The promoter regions of the seven DrRALF genes contained a total of 17 cis-regulatory elements linked to plant hormone responsiveness. The DrRALF7 promoter contained the most cis-acting elements, which included two abscisic acid (ABA)-responsive elements, one auxin-responsive element, one methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-responsive element, and one salicylic acid (SA)-responsive element. This was followed by the DrRALF3 promoter, which contained cis-regulatory elements responsive to ABA, MeJA, and SA. Both DrRALF1 and DrRALF5 contained two hormone-responsive elements, specifically those linked to ABA and MeJA. By contrast, DrRALF2 and DrRALF6 each contained only a single hormone-responsive element.
We analyzed the GRAS-binding sites within the promoter regions of DrRALFs. The results indicated that six of the seven DrRALF genes contained a total of 23 GRAS-binding sites in their promoter regions. Among these, the promoter of DrRALF7 contained the most GRAS-binding sites (10), followed by DrRALF4 (4 sites), DrRALF1 and DrRALF6 (each with 3 sites), DrRALF5 (2 sites), and DrRALF2 (1 site). No GRAS-binding sites were detected in the DrRALF3 promoter.

2.3. Expression Patterns of DrRALFs in Different Organisms

The expression of DrRALFs was examined using RNA-seq data, and we focused on their tissue-specific expression patterns and roles during tuber development. DrRALF7 exhibited very low expression levels across all 12 tissues and was undetectable in some tissues. DrRALF1 was exclusively expressed in flowers. By contrast, DrRALF2, DrRALF3, DrRALF4, DrRALF5, and DrRALF6 were highly expressed across the 12 tissues, with the exception of DrRALF2 in spines and DrRALF5 in the rachis. The expression levels of DrRALF2, DrRALF3, DrRALF4, and DrRALF6 were the highest in flowers, whereas that of DrRALF5 was the highest in the roots (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S5).
The expression profiles of DrRALFs were further investigated across all stages of tuber development. DrRALF7 expression was undetectable across all stages of tuber development. In contrast, the transcript levels of DrRALF1, DrRALF2, DrRALF3, and DrRALF6 became progressively down-regulated during tuber development. The expression of DrRALF4 and DrRALF5 peaked during early tuber development, and this was followed by a decline in transcript abundance as the tubers matured (Figure 6 and Supplementary Table S6).

2.4. qRT-PCR Revealed the Role of DrRALFs in Tuber Expansion

To further elucidate variation in the expression of DrRALF genes during tuber development, qRT-PCR was used to analyze their expression in yam tubers at five distinct developmental stages: the tuber initiation stage, early expansion stage, mid-expansion stage, late expansion stage, and maturation stage. As DrRALF7 expression was not detected, our analysis focused exclusively on DrRALF16. Consistent with the RNA-seq data, the expression of DrRALF1/2/3/6 progressively declined from the early expansion stage to the maturation stage. However, in contrast to the RNA-seq results, the expression of these genes was lower during the tuber initiation stage than during the early expansion stage. The expression profile of DrRALF4 was distinct, and its expression gradually increased from the initiation stage to the middle stage; it then declined steadily thereafter. In contrast, the expression of DrRALF5 was the highest during the late expansion stage (Figure 7).
Through an integrative analysis combining bioinformatics and qRT-PCR, four DrRALF genes (DrRALF2/4/5/6) were found to exhibit significant stage-specific expression patterns during yam tuber development. The presence of GRAS-binding sites in the cis-regulatory elements of the promoters reflects the potential functions of these genes in GRAS-mediated regulatory pathways. According to these findings, these four genes were designated as key candidates and subjected to subsequent functional and mechanistic studies. We subsequently analyzed the effects of GA and PP333 treatments on their expression patterns. Exogenous GA treatment led to the significant up-regulation of DrRALF2/4/6 expression in yam tubers, and the expression of DrRALF5 was significantly down-regulated. In contrast, treatment with exogenous PP333 reduced the expression levels of DrRALF2/6, and DrRALF5 expression was significantly enhanced (Figure 8).

2.5. Characterization of the Secretory Properties of DrRALFs

The pSUC2 yeast secretion system was used to validate the secretory functions of DrRALF2/4/5/6. Recombinant plasmids containing pSUC2-DrRALF2, pSUC2-DrRALF4, pSUC2-DrRALF5, and pSUC2-DrRALF6 were generated and transformed into YTK12; pSUC2 and pSUC2-Avr1b were used as the negative and positive control, respectively. The results demonstrated that the negative control failed to grow on YPRAA plates, whereas yeast cells expressing pSUC2-DrRALF2, pSUC2-DrRALF4, pSUC2-DrRALF5, and pSUC2-DrRALF6 could grow normally on both CMD-W and YPRAA plates (Figure 9A). The secretory characteristics of DrRALFs were further validated using the TTC color reaction. The results showed that yeast strain YTK12, which contains recombinant plasmids encoding the signal peptides of pSUC2-DrRALF1, pSUC2-DrRALF2, pSUC2-DrRALF5, pSUC2-DrRALF6, or the positive control pSUC2-Avr1b, secreted functional invertase, which is capable of hydrolyzing sucrose into monosaccharides. These monosaccharides reacted with TTC to generate water-insoluble red triphenylformazan, which provides strong biochemical evidence confirming the secretory function of DrRALF2/4/5/6 (Figure 9B).

2.6. Validation of the Interaction Between DrRALFs and DrDELLA1 Through Yeast One-Hybrid Assay

The promoter regions of DrRALF2/4/5/6 were cloned into the pHIS2 vector to determine whether DrDELLA1 regulates DrRALF2/4/5/6 expression (Supplementary Files S1–S4 and Figures S2–S5), and the DrDELLA1 coding sequence was inserted into the pGADT7 vector (Supplementary File S5 and Figure S6). The background screening assay revealed that the transformants harboring pHIS2-DrRALF2+pGADT7, pHIS2-DrRALF4+pGADT7, pHIS2-DrRALF5+pGADT7, and pHIS2-DrRALF6+pGADT7 did not grow on SD-TLH medium supplemented with 100 mM, 150 mM, 150 mM, and 50 mM 3-AT, respectively, indicating that the HIS3 reporter gene was not activated under these conditions (Supplementary Figures S7 and S8).
These recombinant plasmids were co-transformed into Y187 to assess the interaction between pHIS2-DrRALF2/4/5/6 and pGADT7-DrDELLA1 through a yeast one-hybrid assay. The positive control, pGAD53m+pHIS2-p53, grew as expected on SD-TL, SD-TLH, and SD-TLH media supplemented with 3AT (Figure 10). The negative controls, including pHIS2-DrRALF2+pGADT7, pHIS2-DrRALF4+pGADT7, pHIS2-DrRALF5+pGADT7, and pHIS2-DrRALF6+pGADT7, grew normally on SD-TL and SD-TLH media. However, they did not grow on SD-TLH media supplemented with 100 mM 3AT, 150 mM 3AT, 150 mM 3AT, and 50 mM 3AT. pHIS2-DrRALF2+pGADT7-DELLA1 exhibited normal growth on both SD-TL and SD-TLH media but did not grow on SD-TLH media supplemented with 100 mM 3AT. pHIS2-DrRALF4+pGADT7-DELLA1 and pHIS2-DrRALF5+pGADT7-DELLA1 grew normally on SD-TL and SD-TLH media but were unable to grow on SD-TLH media supplemented with 150 mM 3AT. In contrast, pHIS2-DrRALF6+pGADT7-DELLA1 grew normally on SD-TL, SD-TLH, and SD-TLH media supplemented with 50 mM 3AT. These findings demonstrate an interaction between pHIS2-DrRALF6 and pGADT7-DELLA1; pHIS2-DrRALF2, pHIS2-DrRALF4, and pHIS2-DrRALF5 did not interact with pGADT7-DELLA1.

3. Discussion

3.1. RALF Genes in Yam

RALF peptides occur widely in plants and regulate growth, hormone signaling, and stress responses. Initially identified for their inhibitory effect on primary root growth, RALFs have been shown to exert similar effects in various plants, including Arabidopsis, Taraxacum koksaghyz, and grass sugarcane [15,29,30,31]. Additional studies have revealed that RALFs regulate pollen maturation and germination, pollen tube integrity, flowering, and fruit ripening [17,22,23,32,33]. RALFs also affect plant immunity and adaptation to abiotic stress [34,35]. RALFs have been identified in multiple species, including Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and soybean [36,37,38,39]. Here, we identified seven RALF genes in the yam genome, which is significantly smaller than the number of RALF genes identified in species such as Arabidopsis (37), maize (20), Chenopodium quinoa (18), and soybean (27) [37,38,39,40]. This disparity might be related to the vegetative reproduction of yam. Vegetatively propagated plants, which lack genetic recombination, typically exhibit lower genetic diversity and have a more stable genomic structure, which potentially limits the expansion and diversification of gene families [41,42].
RALFs are typical secretory proteins, and their N-terminal contains a conserved cysteine-rich signal peptide, which is critically important for processing and quality control [43,44]. To generate a mature active peptide, the conserved RRXL motif of the RALF precursor is cleaved by a protease [45]. Previous research has indicated that the RR motif negatively regulates immune responses by RALFs [46,47]. However, not all RALF proteins possess the conserved RR motif, and only approximately one-third of the RALFs in Arabidopsis contain the S1P cleavage site [18,40]. In our study, all DrRALFs contained signal peptide sequences, and most of them contained the RR motif (except for DrRALF1 and DrRALF2). This suggests that DrRALFs are functionally conserved in yam.
The conserved YISY motif plays an essential role in receptor binding as well as RALF activity. The YI and Y residues are highly conserved. Among the seven DrRALFs, five contain the conserved YISY motif, suggesting that their functional activity is high. However, the YI motif is replaced by KI and TI in DrRALF2 and DrRALF5, respectively. Our findings also indicate that RALFs lacking the YISY motif were still able to bind to receptors and form complexes, but they lost their functional activity.

3.2. Gene Duplication and Phylogenetic Analysis Reveal Mechanisms of Gene Family Expansion and the Functional Conservation of DrRALFs

The expansion of plant gene families is closely associated with genome size, environmental adaptation, and the evolutionary history of species [48,49,50]. WGD and tandem duplication drive gene family expansion, especially in plants [51,52,53]. These duplication events not only increase the number of genes but also facilitate the functional diversification of genes. Tandem duplication has been a major driver of RALF gene expansion in Arabidopsis, soybean, and rice [38,54]. However, Xue et al. [39] indicated that WGD is the main factor underlying the expansion of RALF genes in maize. In our study, three of the seven DrRALFs identified in yam stemmed from WGD or segmental duplication, and evidence of tandem duplications is lacking. This indicates that DrRALF genes mainly originated from WGD or segmental duplication, in contrast to other plant species, such as Arabidopsis or soybean, where tandem duplication is the major driver of RALF gene expansion. This discrepancy may reflect the unique evolutionary history of yam. As a vegetatively propagated plant, the expansion of gene families in yam may depend more on WGD and segmental duplication, which help maintain genomic stability and enhance genetic diversity within the plant.
Campbell and Turner [55] conducted a comprehensive study on RALF genes across various plants and revealed that they can be classified into four groups based on their conserved motifs. Our phylogenetic analysis also categorized RALF genes from Arabidopsis and yam into four clades according to their evolutionary distances. The distribution of DrRALF genes was uneven, with six DrRALF genes clustered in Clade III. This pattern suggests that RALF genes in yam and other species are highly conserved, implying that the functional diversity of these RALF genes in yam may be relatively limited. However, the single DrRALF gene in Clade II may have a distinct function. Our analysis revealed that DrRALF3 shares homology with RALF34, and DrRALF2 is likely orthologous to RALF32, suggesting that these gene pairs may play similar roles in different species. Previous studies have demonstrated that RALF32 and RALF34 regulate various processes in Arabidopsis, including seedling growth, lateral root formation, and pollen tube rupture [17,18,56]. Future functional studies will be essential for exploring the roles of DrRALF genes in yam.

3.3. Analysis of Expression Patterns Suggests That DrRALFs Play a Role in Yam Development

RALFs are thought to be involved in both vegetative and reproductive growth processes in various plant species. In particular, they are known to inhibit root growth by limiting cell expansion [44,57]. In Arabidopsis, overexpression of RALF1 induces a dwarf phenotype characterized by smaller leaves and reductions in root length and numbers of lateral roots, and silencing of RALF1 leads to elongated roots and hypocotyls [58,59]. In our study, the root-specific expression of DrRALF5 in yam suggests that its role in root elongation or patterning is conserved and potentially analogous to the role of RALF1 in Arabidopsis.
Moreover, the floral-specific expression patterns of several DrRALF genes (DrRALF1–4 and DrRALF6) suggest they may participate in floral organ differentiation or reproductive signaling. Previous research has demonstrated that RALFs regulate flowering and fruit maturation in plants. Yuan et al. [60] found that RALF transcript abundance in Phalaenopsis leaves significantly increases during the flowering period. RALF1 delays flowering in Arabidopsis by interacting with the receptor FERONIA (FER), thereby regulating the accumulation of transcripts of flowering-related genes and mRNA alternative splicing [33].
RALFs have also been associated with fruit development and maturation in other species such as Solanum chacoense [61], Chinese cabbage [62], and strawberry [63]. The expression levels of DrRALF1, DrRALF2, DrRALF3, and DrRALF6 genes were down-regulated during yam tuber development, whereas the expression of DrRALF4 and DrRALF5 peaked in the early stage of tuber development. These patterns imply that DrRALFs may play temporally and tissue-specific roles in the tuber expansion process.
Furthermore, the enrichment of hormone-responsive cis-regulatory elements in DrRALF promoters, particularly those involved in GA, ABA, and auxin signaling, suggests that these genes may act as integrators of environmental and hormonal cues during tuber development (Figure 4).

3.4. DrRALF6 May Be Involved in Regulating Tuber Expansion in Yam Through the GA Signaling Pathway

GA is a key hormone involved in tuber expansion that primarily affects tuber growth and development by either directly or indirectly modulating cell elongation, division, and carbohydrate metabolism [4,5,6,7,8]. Exogenous GA4/7 application promotes stolon elongation and delays tuber initiation in potatoes [9,64]. In Helianthus tuberosus L., GA3 levels are higher prior to tuber formation, which favors stolon formation and growth; however, during tuber development, GA3 levels gradually decrease, and they are negatively correlated with the content of dry matter and sugar in the tubers [10]. GA regulates tuber initiation in yam through the GA-GID1-DELLA signaling pathway [6,14]. We identified potential DrDELLA1-binding sites in the promoters of DrRALF1, DrRALF2, DrRALF4, DrRALF5, DrRALF6, and DrRALF7. Quantitative PCR analysis revealed that GA induced DrRALF2, DrRALF4, and DrRALF6 expression, while PP333 suppressed it. DrRALF5 expression was suppressed by GA but promoted by PP333. Yeast one-hybrid assays further confirmed that the DrRALF6 promoter region interacts with DrDELLA1, suggesting that it plays a role in tuber expansion regulation via the GA-GID1-DELLA pathway. Additionally, GA can activate DELLA-independent pathways, such as calcium-dependent signaling, which suppress tuber expansion in potatoes [11,65,66]. Whether the remaining three DrRALF genes contribute to DELLA-independent GA pathways during tuber expansion requires additional study.
In summary, we identified and characterized seven RALF genes in D. rotundata, including their genomic distribution, evolutionary dynamics, and tissue-specific expression profiles. Notably, DrRALF6 showed GA-responsive expression, and the protein DrDELLA1 (the GA-signaling regulator) has also been shown to bind to its promoter, suggesting a potential link between RALF signaling and gibberellin pathways. Although further in vivo functional validation is required, this interaction supports the hypothesis that DrRALF6 may play a role in GA-mediated tuber development. These findings enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying yam tuber development and provide promising targets for molecular breeding and genetic engineering to improve yield and quality. Overall, our findings may aid the regulation of hormone-responsive pathways in yam and support molecular breeding strategies to improve tuber yield and quality.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of RALF Genes in Yam

RALF genes of Arabidopsis thaliana were obtained from GenBank and The Arabidopsis Information Resource; further details are provided in Supplementary Table S1. Dioscorea rotundata data were obtained from Phytozome. A BLAST search was conducted locally using TBtools (v1.108) to identify potential DrRALF genes; queries were conducted using AtRALF sequences [67]. The E-value threshold was set to 1e-5; the maximum number of sequences retrieved during the initial search (Num of Hits) was 500, and the number of sequences considered for final alignment in the subsequent steps was 250. The initial round of analysis identified seven candidate sequences, which were further subjected to BLAST searches against the SwissProt protein database (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb?query=reviewed:true, accessed on 31 January 2023). These sequences were classified as DrRALF genes (Table 1).

4.2. Chromosomal Location and Collinearity Analysis of DrRALF Genes

The genomic locations of genes were obtained from the Phytozome database. The data were filtered using TBtools (v1.108), and their chromosomal distribution was visualized using TBtools (Advanced Circos module of TBtools v1.108). Collinearity analysis of DrRALFs was conducted using MCScanX in TBtools (v1.108) with default settings.

4.3. Properties of DrRALF Proteins

The molecular weight (Da) and isoelectric point (pI) were determined by the Protein Parameter Calc of TBtools (v1.108)) based on the full-length proteins.

4.4. Phylogenetic Analysis of DrRALF Proteins in Yam

DrRALF protein sequences from both yam and Arabidopsis were aligned by ClustalW in MEGA 11.0.13 with default parameters. The optimal substitution model was selected in MEGA 11.0.13, and the tree was generated using the maximum-likelihood method with the JTT+G model and 1000 bootstrap iterations. iTOL v6 (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 18 March 2023) was used to visualize the tree.

4.5. Promoter Cis-Regulatory Element Analysis

Cis-regulatory elements of the DrRALF promoters were identified using the PlantCARE database (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 7 February 2023). Cis-elements potentially associated with key biological processes were retained. Further details are provided in Supplementary Table S2. TBtools (Simple Biosequence Viewer of TBtools v1.108) was used to visualize the cis-elements, which ensured that the regulatory sequences were comprehensively analyzed.

4.6. Gene Expression Analysis

Transcriptome datasets for yam DrRALFs for different tissues and treatments were obtained from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under accession numbers SRP152752 and DRP003729. The SRP152752 dataset comprises yam tuber tissue samples collected at different developmental stages (initiation, early, middle, and mature), with three biological replicates per stage [46]. DRP003729 consists of transcriptomes derived from various yam tissues [68]. These transcriptome datasets were downloaded and converted into FASTQ format. Transcript abundance was quantified using the Kallisto Super GUI Wrapper (TBtools v1.108) and a pseudo-alignment algorithm. The raw reads were pseudo-aligned to the yam reference transcriptome, and their expression values were normalized to transcripts per million (TPM). Next, the normalized data were extracted, log2-transformed, and visualized via a heatmap generated with Table Row Extract or Filter (TBtools v1.108).

4.7. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Validation

The yam cultivar GH16 (Guihuai 16) was cultivated during 2022–2023, and its germination and growth characteristics were as previously outlined by Zhou et al. [6]. To characterize the expression variation in DrRALFs at different stages of tuber development, tubers were collected at five developmental stages: the initial (40 d), early expansion (60 d), middle expansion (120 d), late expansion (150 d), and maturation (180 d) stages. Five plants were randomly selected for each replication.
To evaluate the effect of gibberellin and an inhibitor of its biosynthesis (PP333) on the expression of DrRALF genes, foliar treatments were performed by spraying GA3 and PP333 at a concentration of 200 mg/L, as described by Zhou et al. [6]. Water was used as the control (CK). Tubers were collected 5 d after treatment. The distal ends (5 mm) of five tubers were washed, chopped, and pooled to form one biological replicate. After freezing in liquid nitrogen, all samples were maintained at −80 °C.
Based on the rna-XM_039267626.1 (DrRALF1), rna-XM_039269945.1 (DrRALF2), rna-XM_039268398.1 (DrRALF3), rna-XM_039271549.1 (DrRALF4), rna-XM_039273644.1 (DrRALF5), and rna-XM_039258130.1 (DrRALF6) sequences in the yam genome, the gene-specific primers for DrRALFs were designed using Primer Premier 5. Primer specificity was verified using NCBI BLAST, with DrACTIN used as the reference gene. Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S3. ArtiCanATM SYBR qPCR Mix from Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) was used to perform qRT-PCR. The relative expression levels of DrCrRLK1Ls, with three independent biological replicates, were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method.

4.8. Verification of the Secretory Function of DrRALFs

The yeast strain YTK12 from Nanjing Ruiyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China) was used to confirm the secretory properties of DrRALF2, DrRALF4, DrRALF5, and DrRALF6. The coding sequences of these DrRALF genes were cloned into the pSUC2 vector. Transformation of the pSUC2-DrRALF constructs into YTK12 was performed following Qiao et al. [69]. Yeast growth was assessed on CMD-W and YPRAA media, and color reactions were monitored using 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC).

4.9. Yeast One-Hybrid Assay

Yeast one-hybrid assays were performed to validate the interactions between DrDELLA1 and the promoter regions of DrRALFs. The 2000 bp upstream promoter regions of DrRALF2, DrRALF4, DrRALF5, and DrRALF6 were inserted into the EcoRI-SacI, EcoRI-XhoI, EcoRI-SacI, and EcoRI-SacI sites of the pHIS2 vector, respectively. DrDELLA1 was fused into the EcoRI-SacI site of the pGADT7 prey vector. The assay followed the protocols outlined in the PT3024-1/Yeast Protocols Handbook (Clontech, US). Both the bait and prey vectors were co-transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain Y187. After overnight cultivation in YPDA medium, the cells were transferred to fresh medium and co-transformed with the plasmids. After transformation, yeast cells were plated on selective SD-TL medium (without tryptophan and leucine) to select for successful co-transformants. Positive interaction candidates were further selected by plating increasing concentrations of 3-aminotriazole (3-AT), a competitive inhibitor of HIS3 expression, onto SD-TLH medium (lacking tryptophan, leucine, and histidine). The HIS3 reporter gene, which was activated following successful protein–protein interactions, was used to detect interactions between DrDELLA1 and the DrRALF promoter regions. The assay was repeated in triplicate to ensure reproducibility, with both positive and negative controls included to validate the specificity and reliability of the interactions.

4.10. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed with at least three biological replicates to ensure statistical reliability. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) data were processed using the 2−ΔΔCT method, and differences in expression levels between treatments or developmental stages were analyzed using Student’s t-test in Microsoft Excel (2019).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26136151/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.X. and L.H.; Data curation, Q.Q., F.S., W.Q., S.L. and L.W.; Formal analysis, F.S., W.Q. and S.L.; Funding acquisition, Q.Q.; Methodology, F.S., W.Q. and S.L.; Writing—original draft, Q.Q.; Writing—review and editing, Q.Q., D.X. and L.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.32460770); Scientific Research Foundation of Yulin Normal University for high-level talents, (Grant No. G2024ZK07); and Earmarked Fund for CARS (CARS-21).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All primary data supporting the findings of this study are openly available in the NCBI SRA under accession numbers SRP152752, (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRP152752, accessed on 10 February 2023) and DRP003729 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=DRP003729, accessed on 10 February 2023). All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article (Supplementary Data).

Acknowledgments

We thank TopEdit (http://www.topeditsci.com, accessed on 5 April 2025) for reviewing the manuscript. We also thank Guiyang Watch Biotechnology for their insightful guidance on data collection and analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
GAGibberellin
qRT-PCRQuantitative Real-Time PCR
RALFRapid Alkalinization Factor
WGDWhole-Genome Duplication
PP333Paclobutrazol

References

  1. Viruel, J.; Segarra-Moragues, J.G.; Raz, L.; Forest, F.; Wilkin, P.; Sanmartín, I.; Catalán, P. Late Cretaceous–Early Eocene Origin of Yams (Dioscorea, Dioscoreaceae) in the Laurasian Palaearctic and Their Subsequent Oligocene–Miocene Diversification. J. Biogeogr. 2015, 43, 750–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Padhan, B.; Panda, D. Potential of Neglected and Underutilized Yams (Dioscorea spp.) for Improving Nutritional Security and Health Benefits. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Khol, M.; Ma, F.; Lei, L.; Liu, W.; Liu, X. A Frontier Review of Nutraceutical Chinese Yam. Foods 2024, 13, 1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vreugdenhil, D.; Sergeeva, L.I. Gibberellins and Tuberization in Potato. Potato Res. 1999, 42, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bao, S.; Hua, C.; Shen, L.; Yu, H. New Insights into Gibberellin Signaling in Regulating Flowering in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Gong, M.; Qin, F.; Xiao, D.; Zhan, J.; Wang, A.; He, L. Regulatory Mechanism of GA3 on Tuber Growth by DELLA-Dependent Pathway in Yam (Dioscorea opposita). Plant Mol. Biol. 2021, 106, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zierer, W.; Rüscher, D.; Sonnewald, U.; Sonnewald, S. Tuber and Tuberous Root Development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2021, 72, 551–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wei, C.-Y.; Fan, D.-L.; Liu, S.-Y.; Yi, S.-C.; Yu, S.-X.; Zhao, G.-C.; Liu, X.-L.; Tang, W.-W. Tuber Development and Propagation Are Inhibited by GA3 Effects on the DELLA-Dependent Pathway in Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus). Weed Sci. 2023, 71, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, X.; LammerenAndré, A.M.; Vermeer, E.; Vreugdenhil, D. The Role of Gibberellin, Abscisic Acid, and Sucrose in the Regulation of Potato Tuber Formation in Vitro. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, L.; Shao, T.; Yang, H.; Chen, M.; Gao, X.; Long, X.; Shao, H.; Liu, Z.; Rengel, Z. The Endogenous Plant Hormones and Ratios Regulate Sugar and Dry Matter Accumulation in Jerusalem Artichoke in Salt-Soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 578, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, K.; Xu, H.; Gao, X.; Fu, X. New Insights into Gibberellin Signaling in Regulating Plant Growth–Metabolic Coordination. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 102074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Daviere, J.M.; Achard, P. Gibberellin signaling in plants. Development 2013, 140, 1147–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Daviere, J.M.; Patrick, A. A Pivotal Role of DELLAs in Regulating Multiple Hormone Signals. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Huang, J.; Jiao, R.; Li, M.; Xiao, D.; Zhan, J.; Wang, A.; He, L. DoDELLA1, a DELLA Protein from Dioscorea Opposite, Regulates the Growth and Development in Transgenic Tobacco by Controlling Gibberellin Level. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 97, 571–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pearce, G.; Moura, D.S.; Stratmann, J.; Ryan, C.A. RALF, a 5-kDa Ubiquitous Polypeptide in Plants, Arrests Root Growth and Development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 12843–12847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Haruta, M.; Sabat, G.; Stecker, K.; Minkoff, B.B.; Sussman, M.R. A Peptide Hormone and Its Receptor Protein Kinase Regulate Plant Cell Expansion. Science 2014, 343, 408–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ge, Z.; Bergonci, T.; Zhao, Y.; Zou, Y.; Du, S.; Liu, M.-C.; Luo, X. Arabidopsis Pollen Tube Integrity and Sperm Release Are Regulated by RALF-Mediated Signaling. Science 2017, 358, 1596–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Stegmann, M.; Monaghan, J.; Smakowska-Luzan, E.; Rovenich, H.; Lehner, A.; Holton, N.; Belkhadir, Y.; Zipfel, C. The Receptor Kinase FER Is a RALF-Regulated Scaffold Controlling Plant Immune Signaling. Science 2017, 355, 287–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ge, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, M.C.; Zhou, L.Z.; Wang, L.; Zhong, S.; Hou, S.; Jiang, J.; Liu, T.; Huang, Q.; et al. LLG2/3 Are Co-receptors in BUPS/ANX-RALF Signaling to Regulate Arabidopsis Pollen Tube Integrity. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, 3256–3265.e3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moussu, S.; Broyart, C.; Santos-Fernandez, G.; Augustin, S.; Wehrle, S.; Grossniklaus, U.; Santiago, J. Structural Basis for Recognition of RALF Peptides by LRX Proteins during Pollen Tube Growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 7494–7503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, C.; Jiang, W.; Zayed, O.; Liu, X.; Tang, K.; Nie, W.; Li, Y.; Long, T.; Liu, L. The LRXs-RALFs-FER Module Controls Plant Growth and Salt Stress Responses by Modulating Multiple Plant Hormones. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020, 8, nwaa149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. McCubbin, A.G.; Lee, C.; Hetrick, A. Identification of genes showing differential expression between morphs in developing flowers of Primula vulgaris. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2006, 19, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, G.; Wu, J.; Wang, X. Cloning and Expression Analysis of a Pollen Preferential Rapid Alkalinization Factor Gene, BoRALF1, from Broccoli Flowers. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 3273–3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sui, J.; Xiao, X.; Yang, J.; Fan, Y.; Zhu, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, B.; Yu, F.; Tang, C. The rubber tree RALF peptide hormone and its receptor protein kinase FER implicates in rubber production. Plant Sci. 2023, 326, 111510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chevalier, E.; Loubert-Hudon, A.; Matton, D.P. ScRALF3, a Secreted RALF-like Peptide Involved in Cell-Cell Communication between the Sporophyte and the Female Gametophyte in a Solanaceous Species. Plant J. 2013, 73, 1019–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Loubert-Hudon, A.; Mazin, B.D.; Chevalier, É.; Matton, D.P. The ScRALF3 Secreted Peptide Is Involved in Sporophyte to Gametophyte Signaling and Affects Pollen Mitosis I. Plant Biol. 2020, 22, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jia, Y.; Li, Y. Genome-Wide Identification and Comparative Analysis of RALF Gene Family in Legume and Non-Legume Species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ninkuu, V.; Yan, J.; Fu, Z.; Yang, T.; Zhang, L.; Ren, J.; Li, G.; Zeng, H. Genome-wide Identification, Phylogenomics, and Expression Analysis of Benzoxazinoids Gene Family in Rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Stress 2023, 10, 100214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Srivastava, R.; Liu, J.; Guo, H.; Yin, Y.; Howell, S. Regulation and Processing of a Plant Peptide Hormone, AtRALF23, in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 59, 930–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mingossi, F.B.; Matos, J.L.; Rizzato, A.P.; Medeiros, A.H.; Falco, M.D.; Silva-Filho, M.C.; Moura, D.C. SacRALF1, a Peptide Signal from the Grass Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), Is Potentially Involved in the Regulation of Tissue Expansion. Plant Mol. Biol. 2010, 73, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Morato do Canto, A.; Ceciliato, P.H.O.; Ribeiro, B.; Morea, F.A.O.; Garcia, A.A.F.; Silva-Filho, M.C.; Moura, D.S. Biological Activity of Nine Recombinant AtRALF Peptides: Implications for Their Perception and Function in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 75, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, L.; Yang, T.; Lin, Q.; Wang, B.; Li, X.; Luan, S.; Yu, F. Receptor Kinase FERONIA Regulates Flowering Time in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kou, X.; Sun, J.; Wang, P.; Wang, D.; Cao, P.; Lin, J.; Chang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wu, J. PbrRALF2-Elicited Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling Is Mediated by the PbrCrRLK1L13-PbrMPK18 Module in Pear Pollen Tubes. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, J.; Yu, F.; Liu, Y.; Du, C.; Li, X.; Zhu, S.; Wang, X. FERONIA Interacts with ABI2-Type Phosphatases to Facilitate Signaling Cross-Talk between Abscisic Acid and RALF Peptide in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E5519–E5527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. He, Y.; Chen, S.; Chen, X.; Xu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Cai, X. RALF22 Promotes Plant Immunity and Amplifies the Pep3 Immune Signal. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 2519–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cao, J.; Shi, F. Evolution of the RALF Gene Family in Plants: Gene Duplication and Selection Patterns. Evol. Bioinform. 2012, 8, EBO.S9652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, W.; Li, C.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Yu, F.; Yi, F. Genome-Wide Analysis of CqCrRLK1L and CqRALF Gene Families in Chenopodium Quinoa and Their Roles in Salt Stress Response. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 918594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, H.; Shui, Z.; Yang, Z.; Shang, J.; Yang, H.; Sun, X.; Du, J. Genome-Wide Characterization of Soybean RALF Genes and Their Expression Responses to Fusarium Oxysporum. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1006028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xue, B.; Liang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Liu, C. Genome-Wide Identification of the RALF Gene Family and Expression Pattern Analysis in Zea mays (L.) under Abiotic Stresses. Plants 2024, 13, 2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abarca, A.; Franck, C.M.; Zipfel, C. Family-Wide Evaluation of RALF Peptides in Arabidopsis Thaliana. bioRxiv 2020, 187, 996–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bicknell, R.A. Understanding Apomixis: Recent Advances and Remaining Conundrums. Plant Cell 2004, 16, S228–S245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Adams, K.L.; Wendel, J.F. Polyploidy and Genome Evolution in Plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Slezina, M.P.; Istomina, E.A.; Korostyleva, T.V.; Kovtun, A.S.; Kasianov, A.S.; Konopkin, A.A.; Shcherbakova, L.A. Molecular Insights into the Role of Cysteine-Rich Peptides in Induced Resistance to Fusarium Oxysporum Infection in Tomato Based on Transcriptome Profiling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ginanjar, E.F.; Teh, O.-k.; Fujita, T. Characterisation of Rapid Alkalinisation Factors in Physcomitrium Patens Reveals Functional Conservation in Tip Growth. New Phytol. 2022, 233, 2442–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Haruta, M.; Constabel, C.P. Rapid Alkalinization Factors in Poplar Cell Cultures. Peptide Isolation, cDNA Cloning, and Differential Expression in Leaves and Methyl Jasmonate-Treated Cells. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 814–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wu, Z.; Jiang, W.; Tao, Z.; Pan, X.; Yu, W.; Huang, H. Morphological and Stage-specific Transcriptome Analyses Reveal Distinct Regulatory Programs Underlying Yam (Dioscorea alata L.) Bulbil Growth. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 71, 1899–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Matos, J.L.; Fiori, C.S.; Silva-Filho, M.C.; Moura, D.S. A Conserved Dibasic Site Is Essential for Correct Processing of the Peptide Hormone AtRALF1 in Arabidopsis Thaliana. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 3343–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lu, K.; Wei, L.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Liu, M.; Zhang, C. Whole-Genome Resequencing Reveals Brassica Napus Origin and Genetic Loci Involved in Its Improvement. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Clark, J.W. Genome Evolution in Plants and the Origins of Innovation. New Phytol. 2023, 240, 2204–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xiao, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, W.; Shi, X.; Huang, S.; Cao, S.; Long, Q.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Xu, X.; et al. Impacts of Reproductive Systems on Grapevine Genome and Breeding. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lynch, M. The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes. Science 2000, 290, 1151–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jaillon, O.; Aury, J.-M.; Noel, B.; Policriti, A.; Clepet, C.; Casagrande, A.; Choisne, N.; Aubourg, S.; Vitulo, N. French-Italian Public Consortium for Grapevine Genome Characterization. The Grapevine Genome Sequence Suggests Ancestral Hexaploidization in Major Angiosperm Phyla. Nature 2007, 449, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Qiao, X.; Li, Q.; Yin, H.; Qi, K.; Li, L.; Wang, R.; Zhang, S.; Paterson, A.H. Gene Duplication and Evolution in Recurring Polyploidization-Diploidization Cycles in Plants. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sharma, A.; Hussain, A.; Mun, B.-G.; Imran, Q.M.; Falak, N.; Lee, S.-U.; Kim, J.Y. Comprehensive Analysis of Plant Rapid Alkalization Factor (RALF) Genes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 106, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Campbell, L.; Turner, S.R. A Comprehensive Analysis of RALF Proteins in Green Plants Suggests There Are Two Distinct Functional Groups. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Trösch, R. Integrity Peptide for Tube Walls. Nat. Plants 2023, 9, 1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Schoenares, S.; Lee, H.K.; Gonneau, M.; Faucher, E.; Levasseur, T.; Akary, E.; Claeijs, N. Rapid Alkalinization Factor 22 Has a Structural and Signalling Role in Root Hair Cell Wall Assembly. Nat. Plants 2024, 10, 494–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bergonci, T.; Silva-Filho, M.C.; Moura, D.S. Antagonistic Relationship between AtRALF1 and Brassinosteroid Regulates Cell Expansion-Related Genes. Plant Signal. Behav. 2014, 9, e976146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Campos, W.F.; Dressano, K.; Ceciliato, P.H.O.; Guerrero-Abad, J.C.; Silva, A.L.; Fiori, C.S.; do Canto, A.M. Arabidopsis Thaliana Rapid Alkalinization Factor 1-Mediated Root Growth Inhibition Is Dependent on Calmodulin-like Protein 38. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 2159–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yuan, X.; Xu, S.; Liang, F.; Jiang, S.; Wang, M.; Ma, J.; Zhang, X.; Cui, B. Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Phalaenopsis Leaves in the Vegetative and Flowering Phase. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Germain, H.; Chevalier, E.; Caron, S.; Matton, D.P. Characterization of Five RALF-like Genes from Solanum Chacoense Provides Support for a Developmental Role in Plants. Planta 2004, 220, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, Y.; Nie, C.; Cao, J. Isolation and characterization of a novel BcMF14 gene from Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 38, 1821–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Negrini, F.; O’Grady, K.; Hyvönen, M.; Folta, K.M.; Baraldi, E. Genomic structure and transcript analysis of the Rapid Alkalinization Factor (RALF) gene family during host-pathogen crosstalk in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria x ananassa strawberry. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0226448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Saidi, A.; Hajibarat, Z. Phytohormones: Plant Switchers in Developmental and Growth Stages in Potato. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cheng, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, H.; Zhang, F. Comparative Proteomics Illustrates the Molecular Mechanism of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Tuberization Inhibited by Exogenous Gibberellins in Vitro. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 163, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ito, T.; Okada, K.; Fukazawa, J.; Takahashi, Y. DELLA-Dependent and -Independent Gibberellin Signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2018, 13, e1445933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.; Frank, M.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Muluneh, T.; Satoshi, N.; Hiroki, T.; Benjamen, W.; Hiroki, Y.; Motoki, S.; Kentaro, Y.; Aiko, U.; Kaori, O.; Akira, A.; et al. Genome Sequencing of the Staple Food Crop White Guinea Yam Enables the Development of a Molecular Marker for Sex Determination. BMC Biol. 2017, 15, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Qiao, Q. Genome-Wide Exploration and Characterization of the RALFs and Analysis of Its Role in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chromosomal mapping of DrRALFs in the yam genome. Six DrRALF genes (DrRALF1DrRALF6) were distributed across chromosomes with NC identifiers, and DrRALF7 was located on an unanchored scaffold labeled with an NW identifier. Red text represents the individual gene names of DrRALFs, while yellow text indicates the corresponding chromosomes. The chromosomal positions were visualized using TBtools (v1.108). The scale on the left indicates chromosome length in megabases (Mb). Only chromosomes containing DrRALF gene loci are are shown.
Figure 1. Chromosomal mapping of DrRALFs in the yam genome. Six DrRALF genes (DrRALF1DrRALF6) were distributed across chromosomes with NC identifiers, and DrRALF7 was located on an unanchored scaffold labeled with an NW identifier. Red text represents the individual gene names of DrRALFs, while yellow text indicates the corresponding chromosomes. The chromosomal positions were visualized using TBtools (v1.108). The scale on the left indicates chromosome length in megabases (Mb). Only chromosomes containing DrRALF gene loci are are shown.
Ijms 26 06151 g001
Figure 2. Amino acid sequence alignment of DrRALFs. The red box highlights the predicted signal peptide, and the black box marks the proteolytic cleavage site. Based on the characteristic features of plant RALFs, the mature domain of DrRALFs was identified, which includes the N-terminal YISY motif, the C-terminal RGC(5N)C motif, and the RCRR motif. Consensus represents the most frequent amino acid at each position across all aligned sequences, providing a visual summary of conserved residues. Occupancy indicates the frequency of each amino acid at every position, reflecting the variability or conservation of that position within the aligned sequences. Quality denotes the confidence in the alignment accuracy at each position, with higher quality indicating more reliable and precise alignments. Conservation illustrates the degree of evolutionary conservation, with higher conservation indicated by brighter shading and lower conservation by darker shading.
Figure 2. Amino acid sequence alignment of DrRALFs. The red box highlights the predicted signal peptide, and the black box marks the proteolytic cleavage site. Based on the characteristic features of plant RALFs, the mature domain of DrRALFs was identified, which includes the N-terminal YISY motif, the C-terminal RGC(5N)C motif, and the RCRR motif. Consensus represents the most frequent amino acid at each position across all aligned sequences, providing a visual summary of conserved residues. Occupancy indicates the frequency of each amino acid at every position, reflecting the variability or conservation of that position within the aligned sequences. Quality denotes the confidence in the alignment accuracy at each position, with higher quality indicating more reliable and precise alignments. Conservation illustrates the degree of evolutionary conservation, with higher conservation indicated by brighter shading and lower conservation by darker shading.
Ijms 26 06151 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of RALFs in yam and Arabidopsis. The proteins are classified into four major clades (I–IV), indicated by red, yellow, green, and blue. DrRALF genes represent yam sequences, while RALF genes without a prefix correspond to Arabidopsis thaliana.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of RALFs in yam and Arabidopsis. The proteins are classified into four major clades (I–IV), indicated by red, yellow, green, and blue. DrRALF genes represent yam sequences, while RALF genes without a prefix correspond to Arabidopsis thaliana.
Ijms 26 06151 g003
Figure 4. Cis-regulatory elements in the DrRALF promoter regions in yam.
Figure 4. Cis-regulatory elements in the DrRALF promoter regions in yam.
Ijms 26 06151 g004
Figure 5. Heatmap of DrRALF expression levels across 12 different tissues in yam.
Figure 5. Heatmap of DrRALF expression levels across 12 different tissues in yam.
Ijms 26 06151 g005
Figure 6. Heatmap of DrRALF expression levels at different developmental stages of yam tubers.
Figure 6. Heatmap of DrRALF expression levels at different developmental stages of yam tubers.
Ijms 26 06151 g006
Figure 7. The expression levels of DrRALFs during tuber expansion. Different letters (a, b, c, d, e) denote significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. The expression levels of DrRALFs during tuber expansion. Different letters (a, b, c, d, e) denote significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 26 06151 g007
Figure 8. Expression patterns of DrRALF2/4/5/6 genes in yam tubers in response to exogenous GA and PP333 treatments. Asterisks (*) denote significant differences (p < 0.05), while double asterisks (**) denote highly significant differences (p < 0.01).
Figure 8. Expression patterns of DrRALF2/4/5/6 genes in yam tubers in response to exogenous GA and PP333 treatments. Asterisks (*) denote significant differences (p < 0.05), while double asterisks (**) denote highly significant differences (p < 0.01).
Ijms 26 06151 g008
Figure 9. Validation of the secretory properties of DrRALF2/4/5/6. (A): Assessment of the secretory function of DrRALF2/4/5/6 using the yeast signal peptide tracking system. (B): Confirmation of the secretory activity of DrRALF2/4/5/6 through the TTC color reaction.
Figure 9. Validation of the secretory properties of DrRALF2/4/5/6. (A): Assessment of the secretory function of DrRALF2/4/5/6 using the yeast signal peptide tracking system. (B): Confirmation of the secretory activity of DrRALF2/4/5/6 through the TTC color reaction.
Ijms 26 06151 g009
Figure 10. Yeast one-hybrid assay for detecting the interaction between pHIS2-DrRALF2/4/5/6 and pGADT7-DrDELLA1. The triangle represents the concentration gradient of the yeast culture on the plates, decreasing from left to right (100, 10−1, and 10−2). The positive control was pHIS2-P53+pGAD53m, and the negative control was pHIS2-DrRALF2/4/5/6+pGADT7.
Figure 10. Yeast one-hybrid assay for detecting the interaction between pHIS2-DrRALF2/4/5/6 and pGADT7-DrDELLA1. The triangle represents the concentration gradient of the yeast culture on the plates, decreasing from left to right (100, 10−1, and 10−2). The positive control was pHIS2-P53+pGAD53m, and the negative control was pHIS2-DrRALF2/4/5/6+pGADT7.
Ijms 26 06151 g010
Table 1. Information on the seven identified RALFs in yam.
Table 1. Information on the seven identified RALFs in yam.
GeneIDChr IDGene RangeGene Length (bp)Num of mRNAmRNA IDNum of ExonmRNA RangemRNA Length (bp)Rename
gene-LOC120260185NC_052475.126172276:261725963211rna-XM_039267626.1126172276:26172596321DrRALF1
gene-LOC120261923NC_052475.126020100:260208227231rna-XM_039269945.1126020100:26020822723DrRALF2
gene-LOC120260830NC_052475.11661275:16619346601rna-XM_039268398.111661275:1661934660DrRALF3
gene-LOC120263587NC_052476.120662702:206633956941rna-XM_039271549.1120662702:20663395694DrRALF4
gene-LOC120265695NC_052477.12075500:20760925931rna-XM_039273644.112075500:2076092593DrRALF5
gene-LOC120249577NC_052489.130005811:300064806701rna-XM_039258130.1130005811:30006480670DrRALF6
gene-LOC120254762NW_024087005.133774:344927191rna-XM_039262807.1133774:34492719DrRALF7
Table 2. Protein parameters of DrRALFs.
Table 2. Protein parameters of DrRALFs.
Sequence IDNumber of Amino AcidsMolecular WeightTheoretical pIInstability IndexAliphatic IndexGrand Average of Hydropathicity
DrRALF110611,639.646.5548.3468.020.029
DrRALF212413,686.38.1849.159.11−0.596
DrRALF312614,165.948.447.6867.38−0.316
DrRALF411112,165.918.6349.5583.69−0.078
DrRALF512714,218.179.0251.9690.79−0.398
DrRALF611712,613.469.5848.6182.74−0.056
DrRALF712814,308.579.8347.773.98−0.359
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiao, Q.; Sheng, F.; Qiao, W.; Li, S.; Wang, L.; Xiao, D.; He, L. Genome-Wide Characterization of DrRALF Genes in Yam (Dioscorea rotundata) Reveals Their Potential Roles in Tuber Expansion and the Gibberellin Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 6151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136151

AMA Style

Qiao Q, Sheng F, Qiao W, Li S, Wang L, Xiao D, He L. Genome-Wide Characterization of DrRALF Genes in Yam (Dioscorea rotundata) Reveals Their Potential Roles in Tuber Expansion and the Gibberellin Response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(13):6151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiao, Qinghua, Furui Sheng, Wei Qiao, Shanshan Li, Liying Wang, Dong Xiao, and Longfei He. 2025. "Genome-Wide Characterization of DrRALF Genes in Yam (Dioscorea rotundata) Reveals Their Potential Roles in Tuber Expansion and the Gibberellin Response" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 13: 6151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136151

APA Style

Qiao, Q., Sheng, F., Qiao, W., Li, S., Wang, L., Xiao, D., & He, L. (2025). Genome-Wide Characterization of DrRALF Genes in Yam (Dioscorea rotundata) Reveals Their Potential Roles in Tuber Expansion and the Gibberellin Response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(13), 6151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136151

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop