Next Article in Journal
6,6′-((Ethane-1,2-diylbis(azanediyl))bis(methylene))bis(2,4-bis(2-phenylpropan-2-yl)phenolate)zirconium(IV) Dichlorido
Previous Article in Journal
N-(p-Toluenesulfonyl)-1-(4′-acetylphenoxy)acrylimidate: Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Theoretical Studies
 
 
Short Note
Peer-Review Record

2-Furanylmethyl N-(2-propenyl)carbamate

Molbank 2022, 2022(4), M1510; https://doi.org/10.3390/M1510
by Noah C. Baker, Abby L. Mock, Ivy B. Nguyen, Savan D. Patel and David C. Forbes *
Reviewer 1:
Molbank 2022, 2022(4), M1510; https://doi.org/10.3390/M1510
Submission received: 4 November 2022 / Revised: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 1 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Organic Synthesis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors report a preparation of 2-Furanylmethyl N-(2-propenyl)carbamate, which was not previously described. The title compound was fully characterized using NMR, IR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The synthetic route is also meaningful and sounds reasonable. Overall, the manuscript can be published in Molbank following minor revision:

1. In experimental part, HRMS data for calculated and experimental data deviates in one proton. This should be corrected. You should provide the calculated value for molecular ion with proton.

2. All schemes are somehow shifted on left, while its better to align them to the center.

Author Response

21-Nov22

Thank you for forwarding and as you will note with the attached file, two comments were forwarded and both comments have been addressed.  I have amended the calculated value for the molecular ion and have modified the manuscript so that the text/figures/schemes are now centered and match the font size/style.  I am more than willing to address any additional concerns and am grateful for this opportunity to amend and resubmit.

Respectfully submitted,

David Forbes 

Professor of Chemistry

University of South Alabama

*****************************

From the review report form:

1. In experimental part, HRMS data for calculated and experimental data deviates in one proton. This should be corrected. You should provide the calculated value for molecular ion with proton.

2. All schemes are somehow shifted on left, while its better to align them to the center.

Back to TopTop