Next Article in Journal
Methyl 8- and 5-Bromo-1,4-Benzodioxane-2-carboxylate: Unambiguous Identification of the Two Regioisomers
Next Article in Special Issue
2-(2,5-Dimethoxyphenyl)pyrrole-3-carbonitrile
Previous Article in Journal
2,2’-[(1E,1’E)-{[Hexa-2,4-diyne-1,6-diylbis(oxy)]bis(2,1-phenylene)}bis(ethene-2,1-diyl)]bis(4H-chromen-4-one)
Previous Article in Special Issue
2-(3-Bromophenyl)imidazo[2,1-b]oxazole
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

3a-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-methyl-3a,4-dihydroimidazo[1,5-a]quinazolin-5(3H)-one: Synthesis and In Silico Evaluation as a Ligand in the µ-Opioid Receptor

Molbank 2023, 2023(2), M1622; https://doi.org/10.3390/M1622
by Andrea Defant *, Nicole Innocenti and Ines Mancini *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molbank 2023, 2023(2), M1622; https://doi.org/10.3390/M1622
Submission received: 22 March 2023 / Revised: 13 April 2023 / Accepted: 14 April 2023 / Published: 17 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Heterocycle Reactions)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The Communication entitled: “3a-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-methyl-3a,4-dihydroimidazo[1,5-a] quinazolin-5(3H)-one: Synthesis and in silico Evaluation as Ligand in the µ-Opioid Receptor”

by Andrea Defant, Nicole Innocenti, and Ines Mancini

reports the synthesis of the title compound with a noticeable 60 % overall yield owing the high yield and purity of the intermediates involved, and the consequent no need of their purification. Thus, the chemistry is fine, and the intermediates and the final compound are fully characterized. Moreover, the authors carried out an ‘in silico’ study of the novel compound as ligand in the µ-opioid receptor in comparison with the opioids morphine, fentanyl and BU72, that displayed favourable predicted blood-brain barrier permeation and drug-likeness.

Overall, I think this manuscript is well-written and appropriate for publication in Molbank, however, a minor revision is needed.

·         At row 9 of ‘Results and discussion’ section: please correct the typo ‘transamidation-cyclizaion’ into ‘transamidation-cyclization’

·         In both ‘Abstract’ and ‘Conclusion’ sections the synthesis is indicated to occur in 3 steps, but the overall steps are four, please correct.

Author Response

The authors are grateful to the reviewer for the time devoted to this revision, for his/her positive evaluation and comments.

At row 9 of ‘Results and discussion’ section: please correct the typo ‘transamidation-cyclizaion’ into ‘transamidation-cyclization’

Answer form the authors: done

In both ‘Abstract’ and ‘Conclusion’ sections the synthesis is indicated to occur in 3 steps, but the overall steps are four, please correct.

Answer form the authors: done

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is well written

Author Response

The authors are very grateful to the reviewer for the time devoted to this revision and for his/her their positive evaluation.

Back to TopTop