Next Article in Journal
Ultrafast Resolution-Enhanced Digital Optical Frequency Comb-Based BOTDA with Pump Pulse Array Coding
Previous Article in Journal
Low-Power RFED Wake-Up Receiver Design for Low-Cost Wireless Sensor Network Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Seno, A.H.; Ferri Aliabadi, M.H. Impact Localisation in Composite Plates of Different Stiffness Impactors under Simulated Environmental and Operational Conditions. Sensors 2019, 19, 3659

by
Aldyandra Hami Seno
and
M.H. Ferri Aliabadi
*
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(22), 6410; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226410
Submission received: 18 September 2020 / Accepted: 26 October 2020 / Published: 10 November 2020
The author wishes to make the following correction to this paper [1] due to mislabeling (as an artifact from our code) and would like to replace the following figures:
Figure 11. Visualisation of impact localisation for soft impacts (F8) using different methods: ANN (left) and reference database (right).
Figure 11. Visualisation of impact localisation for soft impacts (F8) using different methods: ANN (left) and reference database (right).
Sensors 20 06410 g001
Figure 13. Visualisation of impact localisation for soft impacts (F8) using different input features: NSET extracted ToA (left) and S/LTA-AIC extracted ToA with normalized minimum amplitude (right).
Figure 13. Visualisation of impact localisation for soft impacts (F8) using different input features: NSET extracted ToA (left) and S/LTA-AIC extracted ToA with normalized minimum amplitude (right).
Sensors 20 06410 g002
Figure 15. Visualisation of impact localisation for impacts with added noise for hard (F7, left) and soft (F9, right) impacts on the flat plate.
Figure 15. Visualisation of impact localisation for impacts with added noise for hard (F7, left) and soft (F9, right) impacts on the flat plate.
Sensors 20 06410 g003
Figure 17. Visualisation of impact localisation for impacts with added noise for hard (C4, left) and soft (C6, right) impacts on the curved plate.
Figure 17. Visualisation of impact localisation for impacts with added noise for hard (C4, left) and soft (C6, right) impacts on the curved plate.
Sensors 20 06410 g004
With the following corrected Figure 11, 13, 15 and 17:
The reason being that the localization results shown in these figures are not only from ANNs but also from the proposed database (DTB) method and as such it is more appropriate that the label should be “predicted locations” rather than “ANN predicted locations”. This change will not affect any results or findings in the paper.
We apologize for any convenience caused by this change.

Reference

  1. Seno, A.H.; Ferri Aliabadi, M.F. Impact Localisation in Composite Plates of Different Stiffness Impactors under Simulated Environmental and Operational Conditions. Sensors 2019, 19, 3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 11. Visualisation of impact localisation for soft impacts (F8) using different methods: ANN (left) and reference database (right).
Figure 11. Visualisation of impact localisation for soft impacts (F8) using different methods: ANN (left) and reference database (right).
Sensors 20 06410 g005
Figure 13. Visualisation of impact localisation for soft impacts (F8) using different input features: NSET extracted ToA (left) and S/LTA-AIC extracted ToA with normalized minimum amplitude (right).
Figure 13. Visualisation of impact localisation for soft impacts (F8) using different input features: NSET extracted ToA (left) and S/LTA-AIC extracted ToA with normalized minimum amplitude (right).
Sensors 20 06410 g006
Figure 15. Visualisation of impact localisation for impacts with added noise for hard (F7, left) and soft (F9, right) impacts on the flat plate.
Figure 15. Visualisation of impact localisation for impacts with added noise for hard (F7, left) and soft (F9, right) impacts on the flat plate.
Sensors 20 06410 g007
Figure 17. Visualisation of impact localisation for impacts with added noise for hard (C4, left) and soft (C6, right) impacts on the curved plate.
Figure 17. Visualisation of impact localisation for impacts with added noise for hard (C4, left) and soft (C6, right) impacts on the curved plate.
Sensors 20 06410 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Seno, A.H.; Aliabadi, M.H.F. Correction: Seno, A.H.; Ferri Aliabadi, M.H. Impact Localisation in Composite Plates of Different Stiffness Impactors under Simulated Environmental and Operational Conditions. Sensors 2019, 19, 3659. Sensors 2020, 20, 6410. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226410

AMA Style

Seno AH, Aliabadi MHF. Correction: Seno, A.H.; Ferri Aliabadi, M.H. Impact Localisation in Composite Plates of Different Stiffness Impactors under Simulated Environmental and Operational Conditions. Sensors 2019, 19, 3659. Sensors. 2020; 20(22):6410. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226410

Chicago/Turabian Style

Seno, Aldyandra Hami, and M.H. Ferri Aliabadi. 2020. "Correction: Seno, A.H.; Ferri Aliabadi, M.H. Impact Localisation in Composite Plates of Different Stiffness Impactors under Simulated Environmental and Operational Conditions. Sensors 2019, 19, 3659" Sensors 20, no. 22: 6410. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226410

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop