Next Article in Journal
Vessel Scheduling Optimization Model Based on Variable Speed in a Seaport with One-Way Navigation Channel
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Microwave Sensor for Solid and Liquid Substances Based on Closed Loop Resonator
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Attitude and Heading Accuracy with Double Quaternion Parameters Estimation and Magnetic Disturbance Rejection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microwave Spoof Surface Plasmon Polariton-Based Sensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of Liquid Analyte Dielectric Constant

BioSense Institute, University of Novi Sad, Dr Zorana Djindjica 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(16), 5477; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165477
Submission received: 16 June 2021 / Revised: 3 August 2021 / Accepted: 5 August 2021 / Published: 13 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna and Microwave Sensors)

Abstract

:
In this paper, a microwave microfluidic sensor based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons (SSPPs) was proposed for ultrasensitive detection of dielectric constant. A novel unit cell for the SSPP structure is proposed and its behaviour and sensing potential analysed in detail. Based on the proposed cell, the SSPP microwave structure with a microfluidic reservoir is designed as a multilayer configuration to serve as a sensing platform for liquid analytes. The sensor is realized using a combination of rapid, cost-effective technologies of xurography, laser micromachining, and cold lamination bonding, and its potential is validated in the experiments with edible oil samples. The results demonstrate high sensitivity (850 MHz/epsilon unit) and excellent linearity (R2 = 0.9802) of the sensor, which, together with its low-cost and simple fabrication, make the proposed sensor an excellent candidate for the detection of small changes in the dielectric constant of edible oils and other liquid analytes.

1. Introduction

Due to their possibility for real-time, non-contact and non-invasive measurements, microwave sensors present an excellent solution for a wide range of applications, including dielectric constant sensing [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], food quality control [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], gas sensing [20,21,22], detection of biomolecules [23,24], glucose monitoring [25,26], measurements of concentration for liquid solutions [27,28], microwave imaging [29,30], and mechanical motion sensing [31,32]. They can also be combined with other technologies, including microfluidics, which provide compact and cost-effective platforms for rapid detection in small amounts of liquid samples [33,34,35,36]. Although there have been a number of attempts to increase their sensitivity, including employment of split-ring resonators (SRR) [3,14,19,37], transmission lines [15], meta-surface absorbers [16], patch resonators [18], most microwave sensors do not have the ability to detect small changes in dielectric constant, and they are usually proposed for detection in the wide range of values, for applications that do not require accurate detection.
Another promising phenomenon for sensing solutions are surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs), surface waves that naturally occur at the conductor/dielectric interface at optical frequencies. Many unique optical properties of SPPs, such as localized field enhancement and light confinement at the subwavelength scale enabled the realization of miniaturized and highly sensitive sensors suitable for different applications [9,38,39,40,41,42,43]. However, SPPs are not supported at far-infrared, microwave, and terahertz frequencies, and the concept of spoof surface plasmon polaritons (SSPPs) was introduced by using designed structures and plasmonic metamaterials [44,45] with the aim to mimic SPP propagation in those frequency ranges. Different planar designs that support SSPP propagation were proposed in the literature, based on gradient holes [46], corrugations [47,48], zigzag grooves [48], grooves with circular patches [49], and disk resonators [50,51]. In addition, SSPP properties were used for the realization of filters [52,53,54], antennas [55,56] and waveguide systems [57,58,59]. In spite of their high potential for sensing applications, only a few sensors based on SSPP were proposed in the literature including refractive index and thickness sensor [60], a sensor for human skin tissue water content [61], and the detector of Schottky diode [62]. All of the proposed SSPP based sensing solutions [60,61,62] use comb structure unit cells with highly sensitive properties. The sensor for human skin tissue water content [61] based on planar plasmonic waveguide was realized in printed circuit board (PCB) technology and showed the ability for in vivo measurements of the water content in the skin tissue with potential for early diagnostic applications. On the other hand, the Schottky diode detector based on SSPP was also realized in PCB technology where the SSPP configuration enabled a significant increase in detection sensitivity [62]. Although the sensing solution based on metamaterial corrugated metal stripe structure showed ultrasensitive properties for thickness and refractive index sensing, the sensor was not realized experimentally [60]. In addition, SPP-like phenomena were proposed for dielectric constant sensing and the sensor with highly sensitive performances was realized in printed circuit board (PCB) technology [9].
One of the potential applications of microwave sensors in which the sensitive response can provide valuable information about the sample is edible oil quality control. In that sense, dielectric spectroscopy has been used for the detection of adulteration [63], chemical composition [64,65], quality of edible oils [13], frying oil degradation [11,12], characterization of cooking oils [14], usage time of oil [15], and identification of oils [16,17], however, usually lacking high sensitivity and accuracy.
In this paper, we bring together the advantages of microwave and SSPP phenomena as well as the microfluidics concept and realize a very sensitive and low-cost sensor for detection of small changes in the dielectric constant of liquids. First, a novel compact unit cell was proposed, which enables SSPP propagation and strong field confinement in the microwave regime. Based on that, a multi-layer structure that combines the proposed SSPP microwave configuration with a microfluidic channel is proposed, consequently providing a sensing platform for liquids. The proposed sensor is realized using low-cost materials and manufacturing technologies of xurography and laser micromachining, which has been rarely employed in sensor design despite its advantages. To validate the sensing potential in a real-world problem, dielectric constants of edible oil samples are detected and compared to those from the literature. It is shown that the sensor exhibits excellent performance, in particular in terms of fabrication complexity, cost, and sensitivity.
The paper is organised into five sections. After the introduction with a detailed literature overview and the topic description, Section 2 describes the sensor operating principle, its modelling, and simulations. Realization of the sensor through materials and method description is presented in Section 3. The experimental results and comparison with simulations are presented in Section 4, as well as discussion and comparison of the proposed sensor with other sensing solutions proposed for similar applications. Finally, Section 5 presents a summarized conclusion for this research and future research directions.

2. Theoretical and Numerical Analysis

The layout of the proposed sensor is shown in Figure 1. Its operating principle is based on the SSPP structure, which is realized using conductive layers 1 and 7, whereas layers 2–6 serve as dielectric substrates and simultaneously host a microfluidic reservoir. Due to the fabrication procedure, which will be explained in detail in the following section, the layers are made of aluminium (Al) (layers 1 and 7), Polyvinyl Chloride—PVC (layers 2 and 6), Poly (methyl methacrylate)—PMMA (layer 4), and 3 M double-sided adhesive tapes (layers 3 and 5). Moreover, conductive layers have been optimized to have a smooth transition between microstrip lines and ports.
The core element of the sensor is the SSPP structure, i.e., a unit cell, of which the geometrical properties dictate the behaviour of the SSPP structure. Namely, the SSPP phenomenon in such circuits is provided owing to the array of cells, which enables slow-wave behaviour of the structure at the frequencies that correspond to the resonant behaviour of the cell. In other words, at the frequencies that are close to the resonant frequency of unit cell, the wave becomes more confined, and the corresponding dispersion characteristics start to deviate from the light line, finally to reach the frequency that does not allow propagation, and which is characterized by a strong transmission zero in the response of the SSPP structure.
In that sense, first a novel unit cell is proposed, Figure 2a, which provides a more compact structure in comparison to the conventional comb-like one, Figure 2b, owing to the two symmetric bent structures that form a T-shaped gap. If we consider the unit cells as resonant cells with their effective inductance and capacitance, one can note that while the proposed cell has a similar effective capacitance towards the ground layer as the comb-like one, its effective inductance is significantly higher, and consequently, the proposed cell exhibits lower resonant frequency.
To validate the previous statement, dispersion diagrams of the two cells with the same footprint area were examined. The comb-like unit cell is characterized with four parameters presented in Figure 2b—period of unit cell d, the distance between grooves a, depth of groove h, the width of the structure w, and their relations a = 0.4d, h = 0.8d, w = d, while the proposed unit cell is characterised by two additional geometrical parameters—width of the bent structures b = 0.67d, and distance between bent shapes and groove depth x = 0.2(w − h). It can be noticed that all proposed parameters are a function of unit cell period d which enables scaling the structure. The dispersion diagrams were obtained in CST Microwave Studio 2021® Eigenmode solver, using corresponding materials for conductive and dielectric layers as explained at the beginning of this section. The conductive layers are modelled as 40-µm-thick Al with electrical conductivity of 3.56 × 107 S/m. Dielectric constant 3.3 and tanδ 0.15 were used for modelling 80-µm-thick PVC foil and, finally, 2-mm-thick PMMA was modelled with dielectric constant 2.6 and tanδ 0.02. Although it makes a negligible contribution to the results, the 3M double-sided adhesive tapes were modelled as thin films with dielectric constant equal to 3. One should note that the microfluidic reservoir, i.e., the liquid sample in the final sensor, which is a part of the dielectric substrate of the unit cell, is initially set to have the dielectric constant ε r = 1.
Figure 2c presents the comparison of the dispersion diagrams for different values of unit cell period d. Simulation results show that dispersion diagrams for both unit cells deviate significantly from the light line, which indicates slow-wave behaviour and strong field confinement. In both cases, an increase of the period d leads to a decrease in surface plasmon frequency, however, the proposed cell exhibits lower surface plasmon frequencies in all cases of d, which is due to the higher effective inductance and consequently lower resonant frequency.
Since the sensor is based on the SSPP structure, a numerical analysis is done to investigate the sensitivity of the surface plasmon frequency of the two-unit cells, to the dielectric constant of the liquid sample in the microfluidic reservoir. For the sake of simplicity, the dielectric constant is varied from 1 to 5, which approximately corresponds to the values of dielectric constants of edible oils, i.e., real samples that are used in the experiments in the following section. The samples are modelled without considering losses due to the generality of analysis and optimisation of sensing performances. Also, the unit cell period of d = 7.5 mm is chosen as an optimal value, which can provide compact dimensions and simple realization in the proposed hybrid fabrication technology.
The results in Figure 2d present a comparison of dispersion diagrams for the two-unit cells for different values of the dielectric constant of the sample. Additionally, the summary graph for the surface plasmon frequency dependence of the sample’s dielectric constant is given in Figure 2e. As the dielectric constant is increased, surface plasmon frequency shifts to the lower frequencies. The proposed unit cell has better linearity (R2 = 0.9756) than the comb-like unit cell, as well as greater compactness. In addition, for the range of dielectric constants from 1 to 2 where the values of edible oils in the microwave range are expected, the sensitivity of the sensor based on the proposed unit cell was estimated to 850 MHz/epsilon unit.
Although one may argue that the comb-like unit cell has better sensitivity, i.e., higher frequency shift for the same range of the dielectric constants, it should be noted that the proposed unit cell exhibits significantly better linearity, which is another important property for the sensing applications. Therefore, the proposed cell exhibits better overall sensing potential than the comb-like one.
To confirm the behaviour and potential of the proposed unit cell, corresponding SSPP sensor structure has been simulated in CST software. As indicated in Figure 1, the SSPP structure has been optimized and consists of seven-unit cells that are connected to the microstrip line, where impedance matching with the input and output ports have been achieved using tapers. The dielectric substrate consists of five layers so it can host a microfluidic reservoir, which is positioned below the array of the unit cells. The final dimensions of the overall structure are as follows: the whole sensor dimensions 120 mm × 22.5 mm, a microfluidic reservoir 52.5 mm × 7.5 mm, and the width of microstrip line widens from 1 mm to 5 mm where the first corresponds to the input of surface mount assembly (SMA) connectors.
Figure 2f shows responses of the SSPP sensor structure for the different dielectric constant of the liquid sample in the microfluidic reservoir, and one can note narrow and deep transmission zeros that correspond to the surface plasmon frequencies. Namely, at the surface plasmon frequency, the group velocity tends to zero, so there is no wave propagation, which creates a transmission zero in the response. A small disagreement of the exact position of the transmission zeros and surface plasmon frequencies is due to the finite dimensions of the SSPP structures, contrary to infinite arrays of unit cells that were used for numerical simulations of dispersion diagrams.
It should be noted that the presented sensor dimensions have been optimized for excellent sensing properties for the narrow range of dielectric constants of different oil samples. Nevertheless, the sensor can be adjusted to different and wider ranges of dielectric constants. To that end, the configuration should be modified and finely tuned in terms of unit cell dimensions and substrate parameters, which also opens a possibility for further sensor miniaturization. The previous discussion reveals a strong potential of the proposed unit cell and corresponding SSPP structure for sensitive, accurate, and linear sensing of small changes in dielectric constant, whose operating principle is based on the transmission zero shift in the SSPP sensor response. The following section will experimentally confirm this statement, and also show that the proposed sensor is characterised by a low-cost and simple fabrication procedure.

3. Materials and Methods

The proposed sensor consists of a multilayer structure, and thus it requires a multistep fabrication process. Nevertheless, the proposed fabrication procedure is based on the technologies of xurography and laser micromachining with low-cost materials and thus can be considered as simple, cost-effective, and quick since the overall procedure lasts only several minutes.
Conductive layers 1 and 7 are made of aluminium sticky foils and cut with Nd:YAG laser Rofin-Sinar Power Line D-100 laser. Layer 4 with a microfluidic reservoir is made of PMMA, by using CO2 laser CNC—MBL 4040RS. Layers 2 and 6 are made as PVC foils (MBL 80MIC Belgrade, Serbia), while layers 3 and 5 are 3M double-sided adhesive tapes, and they are all cut with Plotter Cutter Roland DG CAMM-1 GS-24. In the cold lamination process, all layers were bonded in the order presented in Figure 1.
The layout of each fabricated layer is shown in Figure 3. The same design was used for the fabrication of PMMA and 3M tape layers, presented in Figure 3a,b, respectively. Top PVC foil, presented in Figure 3c, contains inlet/outlet holes for filling the microfluidic reservoir with samples, while bottom PVC foil (Figure 3d) is used for closing the channel system. Finally, the realized sensor structure is presented in Figure 3e,f in the top and bottom view, respectively.
As stated previously, the aim of the proposed sensor is to be applied for a real-world problem, and thus it is validated through the measurement of the dielectric constants of edible oils, which represents a technique to detect oil quality and adulteration. To that end, the following samples have been used: palm oil (Palm oil for frying, Dijamant, Zrenjanin, Serbia), sunflower oil (Edible Refined oil, Bas Bas, Zrenjanin, Serbia), castor oil (Livsane, Novi Sad, Serbia), and olive oil (Cadel Monte, 100% Italian Extra Virgin Olive Oil). Besides oil samples available on the market, additional 4 samples are prepared by mixing palm and castor oils, and their dielectric constants are calculated according to the Kraszewski formula [66]:
ε r M I X = ε r p υ p + ε r c υ c 2
here ε r M I X presents dielectric constant of oil mixture, ε r p and ε r c present dielectric constant of palm and castor oil, respectively, and υ p and υ c fractional volume of palm and castor oil in the mixed sample. Values of dielectric constants for used oils and calculated values for samples with mixed palm and castor oils are listed in Table 1.
The SSPP sensor was filled with the oil samples starting with palm oil, which has the lowest value of the dielectric constant of the prepared samples. In each following step, the reservoir was rinsed using the sample with the first higher dielectric constant and then filled with the same sample. It should be noted that the microfluidic reservoir has a small volume and thus only 0.8 mL of the sample volume is needed. The responses of the sensor have been measured using a vector network analyser (VNA) E5071C Agilent Technology and surface mount assembly (SMA) connectors (SMA Southwest Microwave 292-04A-5) were used for connection between VNA and SSPP sensor, Figure 4. One-point calibration of the sensor was done with the microfluidic reservoir filled with air.

4. Results and Discussion

Figure 5 and Figure 6 present simulated and measured responses for pure edible oil samples and mixed oil samples, respectively. One should note that the simulated responses have been obtained using the calculated dielectric constants in Table 1. It can be seen that spectral positions of transmission zeros are shifted towards lower frequencies for increasing values of samples’ dielectric constants. In addition, a good agreement between simulation and measurement results can be observed, except for a small spectral shift and higher losses, where the latter can be attributed to the losses in cables and connectors, and imperfection of fabrication procedure. Since the spectral shift is small, it does not influence the sensor performances to a great extent.
The measured results confirm that the proposed sensor is very sensitive to small changes in the dielectric constant of the sample. This is further confirmed in Figure 7 that shows the dependence of the spectral position of the simulated and measured transmission zeros to the dielectric constant of the samples. Both simulated and measured results have excellent linear properties R2 = 0.9971 and R2 = 0.9802, respectively. The sensitivity of the sensor is calculated as f m a x f m i n ε m a x ε m i n where f m a x and f m i n correspond to the frequencies of transmission zeros for samples with highest and lowest dielectric constant ε m a x and ε m i n , respectively, and it is equal to 850 MHz/epsilon unit.
Therefore, the proposed sensor has a potential for application in oil quality control since it is able to distinguish oils with a difference in dielectric constant equal to 0.02. Moreover, it exhibits excellent linearity and accuracy, as well as cost-effectiveness.
To further illustrate the excellent sensing performances of the SSPP sensor, the comparison to other sensors for dielectric constant sensing in edible oils is shown in Table 2.
In terms of complexity, it should be noted that the hybrid approach for sensor fabrication enabled its simple and rapid preparation that can be done in a few minutes. Moreover, the proposed sensor uses less than 1 mL of sample, which reduces the amount of used samples comparing to sensors that have to be immersed during testing. Additionally, the sensor provides high sensitivity, and while the structures in [10,14] have better sensitivity, they require more complex fabrication procedures and operations at higher frequencies, consequently requiring more expensive equipment. Furthermore, the structure in [14] has not been confirmed experimentally. In addition, the proposed sensor has an excellent linearity, which outperforms linearities of other solutions.
Therefore, the proposed sensor presents the first SSPP-based sensing solution for edible oil sensing, and it provides a very sensitive, accurate, and linear response. Together with a quick and simple fabrication procedure, these characteristics make the proposed sensor an excellent candidate for sensing small changes of dielectric constant, not only of edible oils, but also for other liquid analytes.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a very sensitive and low-cost SSPP-based sensor was proposed for the detection of small changes in the dielectric constant of liquids. It is based on a novel compact unit cell, whose behaviour and sensing potential were analysed in detail. The unit cell is a core element of the SSPP microwave configuration which was combined with a microfluidic channel in a multilayer structure, providing a sensing platform for liquids. The sensor was realized in the hybrid fabrication technology that combines xurography and laser micromachining processes and lamination of the realized layers. The proposed technology enables the rapid and simple realization of complex structures and provides reliable and reproducible structures. However, like in every top-down fabrication approach, the size limitations of the technology are determined with the tool used for cutting, i.e., the laser beam width, which limits the size of the realized structures. In addition, further sensor integration into complex systems and devices may require the change of fabrication technology. To validate the sensing potential in a real-world problem, dielectric constants of edible oil samples were detected and compared to those from the literature. It was shown that the sensor exhibits excellent performance outperforming other solutions in terms of fabrication complexity, cost, and sensitivity. In addition, it is shown that sensing based on the SSPP principle opens a possibility for very sensitive applications, and by changing unit cell dimensions or substrate, the proposed sensor can be also adapted for precise measurements of gas or liquid mixtures, control of petroleum product, and food quality control. Therefore, future research will be focused on the novel sensing applications of the SSPP phenomena, as well as the sensor integration into multifunctional systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.P., V.R., N.J. and V.B.; methodology, I.P., V.R. and N.J.; software, I.P., V.R.; validation, I.P., V.R.; formal analysis, I.P., V.R. and N.J.; investigation, I.P., V.R. and N.J.; resources, V.R., N.J. and V.B.; data curation, I.P.; writing—original draft preparation, I.P., N.J. and V.R.; writing—review and editing, N.J., V.B. and V.R.; visualization, I.P., N.J., V.R.; supervision, V.B., N.J. and V.R.; project administration, V.R., N.J. and V.B.; funding acquisition, V.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement NO. 739570 (ANTARES).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Grant No. 451-03-9/2021-14/200358).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saadat-Safa, M.; Nayyeri, V.; Ghadimi, A.; Soleimani, M.; Ramahi, O.M. A pixelated microwave near-field sensor for precise characterization of dielectric materials. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Muñoz-Enano, J.; Coromina, J.; Vélez, P.; Su, L.; Gil, M.; Casacuberta, P.; Martín, F. Planar phase-variation microwave sensors for material characterization: A review and comparison of various approaches. Sensors 2021, 21, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hao, H.; Wang, D.; Wang, Z.; Yin, B.; Ruan, W. Design of a high sensitivity microwave sensor for liquid dielectric constant measurement. Sensors 2020, 20, 5598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ramzan, R.; Omar, M.; Siddiqui, O.F. Energy-tunneling dielectric sensor based on substrate integrated waveguides. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 1264–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wei, Z.; Huang, J.; Li, J.; Xu, G.; Ju, Z.; Liu, X.; Ni, X. A high-sensitivity microfluidic sensor based on a substrate integrated waveguide re-entrant cavity for complex permittivity measurement of liquids. Sensors 2018, 18, 4005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Reyes-Vera, E.; Acevedo-Osorio, G.; Arias-Correa, M.; Senior, D.E. A submersible printed sensor based on a monopole-coupled split ring resonator for permittivity characterization. Sensors 2019, 19, 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Abdolrazzaghi, M.; Daneshmand, M.; Iyer, A.K. Strongly enhanced sensitivity in planar microwave sensors based on metamaterial coupling. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2018, 66, 1843–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jafari, F.S.; Ahmadi-Shokouh, J. Reconfigurable microwave SIW sensor based on PBG structure for high accuracy permittivity characterization of industrial liquids. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 283, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cselyuszka, N.; Sakotic, Z.; Crnojevic-Bengin, V.; Radonic, V.; Jankovic, N. Microwave surface plasmon polariton-like sensor based on half-mode substrate integrated waveguide for highly sensitive dielectric constant detection. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 9984–9992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tiwari, N.K.; Singh, S.P.; Akhtar, M.J. Novel improved sensitivity planar microwave probe for adulteration detection in edible oils. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2019, 29, 164–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, M.; Qin, X.; Chen, Z.; Tang, L.; Borom, B.; Cao, N.; Barnes, D.; Cheng, K.; Chen, J.; Wang, T.; et al. Frying oil evaluation by a portable sensor based on dielectric constant measurement. Sensors 2019, 19, 5375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Khaled, A.Y.; Aziz, S.A.; Rokhani, F.Z. Capacitive sensor probe to assess frying oil degradation. Inf. Process. Agric. 2015, 2, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cataldo, A.; Piuzzi, E.; Cannazza, G.; de Benedetto, E.; Tarricone, L. Quality and anti-adulteration control of vegetable oils through microwave dielectric spectroscopy. Measurement 2010, 43, 1031–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qureshi, S.A.; Abidin, Z.Z.; Ashyap, I.A.Y.; Majid, H.A.; Kamarudin, M.R.; Yue, M.; Zulkipli, M.S.; Nebhen, J. Millimetre-wave metamaterial-based sensor for characterisation of cooking oils. Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2021, 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Erdoğan, M.; Ünal, E.; Özkan Alkurt, F.; Abdulkarim, Y.I.; Deng, L.; Karaaslan, M. Determination of frying sunflower oil usage time for local potato samples by using microwave transmission line based sensors. Measurement 2020, 163, 108040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, J.; Li, J.-S.; Xu, G.; Wei, Z. A microfluidic sensor based on meta-surface absorber for rapid and nondestructive identification of edible oil species. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 2019, 96, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, X.; Ruan, C.; Wang, W.; Cao, Y. Submersible high sensitivity microwave sensor for edible oil detection and quality analysis. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 13230–13238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yadav, R.; Patel, P.N. Experimental study of adulteration detection in fish oil using novel PDMS cavity bonded EBG inspired patch sensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 4354–4361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Galindo-Romera, G.; Herraiz-Martinez, J.F.; Gil, M.; Martinez-Martinez, J.J.; Segovia-Vargas, D. Submersible printed split-ring resonator-based sensor for thin-film detection and permittivity characterization. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 3587–3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, F.; Zheng, Y.; Hua, C.; Jian, J. Gas sensing by microwave transduction: Review of progress and challenges. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bogner, A.; Steiner, C.; Walter, S.; Kita, J.; Hagen, G.; Moos, R. Planar microstrip ring resonators for microwave-based gas sensing: Design aspects and initial transducers for humidity and ammonia sensing. Sensors 2017, 17, 2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rossignol, J.; Harrabi, A.; Stuerga, D.; Pribetich, P.; Bailly, G.; Leblois, T. Critical influence of dielectric sensitive material and manufactured process in microwave gas-sensing: Application of ammonia detection with an interdigital sensor. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 11507–11514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Z.; Xue, Q.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Duan, X. Biomolecules detection using microstrip sensor with highly-ordered nanowires array. In 2019 IEEE Sensors; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jha, A.K.; Havelka, D.; Krivosudsky, O.; Cifra, M. TRL Calibrated Coplanar Microwave Sensor for Characterization of Biomolecules. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and RF Conference (IMaRC); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Omer, A.E.; Shaker, G.; Safavi-Naeini, S.; Kokabi, H.; Alquié, G.; Deshours, F.; Shubair, R.M. Low-cost portable microwave sensor for non-invasive monitoring of blood glucose level: Novel design utilizing a four-cell CSRR hexagonal configuration. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zapasnoy, A.S.; Belichenko, V.P.; Yakubov, V.P.; Gorst, A.V.; Mironchev, A.S.; Klokov, A.V.; Zavyalova, K.V. Application of broadband microwave near-field sensors for glucose monitoring in biological media. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gennarelli, G.; Romeo, S.; Scarfi, M.R.; Soldovieri, F. A microwave resonant sensor for concentration measurements of liquid solutions. IEEE Sens. J. 2013, 13, 1857–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sethi, W.; Ibrahim, A.; Issa, K.; Albishi, A.; Alshebeili, S. A new approach to determining liquid concentration using multiband annular ring microwave sensor and polarity correlator. Electronics 2020, 9, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Foroutan, F.; Nikolova, N.K. Active sensor for microwave tissue imaging with bias-switched arrays. Sensors 2018, 18, 1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Islam, M.T.; Ullah, M.A.; Alam, T.; Singh, M.J.; Cho, M. Microwave imaging sensor using low profile modified stacked type planar inverted F antenna. Sensors 2018, 18, 2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Abdolrazzaghi, M.; Daneshmand, M. Multifunctional ultrahigh sensitive microwave planar sensor to monitor mechanical motion: Rotation, displacement and stretch. Sensors 2020, 20, 1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhu, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhuang, Y.; Huang, J. Displacement and strain measurement up to 1000 °C using a hollow coaxial cable fabry-perot resonator. Sensors 2018, 18, 1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Jankovic, N.; Radonic, V. A microwave microfluidic sensor based on a dual-mode resonator for dual-sensing applications. Sensors 2017, 17, 2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gan, H.-Y.; Zhao, W.-S.; Liu, Q.; Wang, D.-W.; Dong, L.; Wang, G.; Yin, W.-Y. Differential microwave microfluidic sensor based on microstrip complementary split-ring resonator (MCSRR) structure. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 5876–5884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hamzah, H.; Abduljabar, A.A.; Porch, A. High Q microwave microfluidic sensor using a central gap ring resonator. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2020, 68, 1830–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fu, L.; Huang, J.; Xiang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, W.; Wu, Y. A miniaturized differential microwave microfluidic sensor with high decoupling. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2021, 31, 909–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kiani, S.; Rezaei, P.; Navaei, M. Dual-sensing and dual-frequency microwave SRR sensor for liquid samples permittivity detection. Measurement 2020, 160, 107805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Y.; Ma, Y. One-dimensional plasmonic sensors. Front. Phys. 2020, 8, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, H. Surface plasmon polariton high-sensitivity refractive index sensor based on MMF-MOF-MMF structure. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2021, 114, 103685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Joseph, S.; Sarkar, S.; Joseph, J. Grating-coupled surface plasmon-polariton sensing at a flat metal-analyte interface in a hybrid-configuration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 46519–46529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gomez-Cardona, N.; Reyes-Vera, E.; Torres, P. High sensitivity refractive index sensor based on the excitation of long-range surface plasmon polaritons in h-shaped optical fiber. Sensors 2020, 20, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Xu, Y.; Wang, F.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, D.; Sun, X.; Berini, P. Straight long-range surface plasmon polariton waveguide sensor operating at l0 = 850 nm. Sensors 2020, 20, 2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Heydari, M.; Habibzadeh-Sharif, A.; Jabbarzadeh, F. Design of a compact refractive-index sensor based on surface plasmon polariton slot waveguide. Photonics Nanostruct. Fundam. Appl. 2020, 38, 100755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tang, W.X.; Zhang, H.C.; Ma, H.F.; Jiang, W.X.; Cui, T.J. Concept, theory, design and applications of spoof surface plasmon polaritons at microwave frequencies. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1800421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Pendry, J.B.; Martín-Moreno, L.; Garcia-Vidal, F.J. Mimicking surface plasmons with structured surfaces. Science 2004, 305, 847–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, L.; Li, Z.; Xu, B.; Ning, P.; Chen, C.; Xu, J.; Chen, X.; Gu, C. Dual-band trapping of spoof surface plasmon polaritons and negative group velocity realization through microstrip line with gradient holes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 201602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, R.; Lu, G.; Yin, H.; Liang, J.; Zeng, D.; Xiao, H. Terahertz sensor study based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons. Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2020, 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. He, H.P.; Zhang, C.H.; Gao, X.; Niu, Y.L.; Tang, X.W.; Lu, J.; Zhang, P.L.; Cui, J.T. A novel spoof surface plasmon polariton structure to reach ultra-strong field confinements. Opto Electron. Adv. 2019, 2, 19000101–19000107. [Google Scholar]
  49. Liu, L.; Wang, J.; Yin, X.; Chen, Z. Wide-angle beam scanning leaky-wave antenna using spoof surface plasmon polaritons structure. Electronics 2018, 7, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wang, D.; Chen, L.; Fang, B.; Zhu, Y. Spoof localized surface plasmons excited by plasmonic waveguide chip with corrugated disk resonator. Plasmonics 2017, 12, 947–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Farokhipour, E.; Mehrabi, M.; Komjani, N.; Ding, C. A spoof surface plasmon polaritons (SSPPs) based dual-band-rejection filter with wide rejection bandwidth. Sensors 2020, 20, 7311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jaiswal, R.K.; Pandit, N.; Pathak, N.P. Spoof surface plasmon polariton-based reconfigurable band-pass filter using planar ring resonator. Plasmonics 2018, 14, 631–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guo, Y.-J.; Xu, K.-D.; Deng, X.; Cheng, X.; Chen, Q. Millimeter-wave on-chip bandpass filter based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2020, 41, 1165–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, H.; Zhou, P.; Xu, Z.; Li, S.; Yang, M.; Liu, L.; Yin, X. Tri-band band-pass filter based on multi-mode spoof surface plasmon polaritons. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 14767–14776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cao, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, J. A millimeter-wave spoof surface plasmon polaritons-fed microstrip patch antenna array. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 6811–6815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, L.; Chen, M.; Yin, X. Single-layer high gain endfire antenna based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 64139–64144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pan, B.C.; Luo, G.Q.; Liao, Z.; Cai, J.L.; Cai, B.G. Wideband miniaturized design of complementary spoof surface plasmon polaritons waveguide based on interdigital structures. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zhang, Q.L.; Chan, C.H. Compact spoof surface plasmon polaritons waveguide integrated with blind vias and its applications. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2020, 67, 3038–3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, D.; Zhang, K.; Wu, Q.; Jiang, T. Efficient propagation of spoof surface plasmon polaritons supported by substrate integrated waveguide with bandpass features. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 425104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, X.; Fan, W. Ultrasensitive terahertz metamaterial sensor based on spoof surface plasmon. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Liu, G.; Cheng, D.; Zhang, B.; Shu, G.; Wang, J. A microwave biosensor based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons for in vivo measurement of the water content of human skin tissues. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2019, 52, 205401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, L.; Jiang, D. A microwave detector based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons structure. AIP Adv. 2021, 11, 035008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, L.; Chen, J.; Jing, B.; Dong, Y.; Yu, X. New method for the discrimination of adulterated flaxseed oil using dielectric spectroscopy. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 2623–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Valantina, S.R.; Susan, D.; Bavasri, S.; Priyadarshini, V.; Saraswathi, R.R.; Suriya, M. Experimental investigation of electro-rheological properties of modeled vegetable oils. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 1328–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Lizhi, H.; Toyoda, K.; Ihara, I. Dielectric properties of edible oils and fatty acids as a function of frequency, temperature, moisture and composition. J. Food Eng. 2008, 88, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kraszewski, A. Prediction of the dielectric properties of two-phase mixtures. J. Microw. Power 1977, 12, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sairin, M.A.; Nizar, N.N.A.; Aziz, S.A.; Rokhani, F.Z. Study of Dielectric Permittivity and Fatty Acid Composition for Fats and Oil in Wide Frequency Spectroscopy Measurement at 0.5–50 GHz. In Proceedings of the 2016 10th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST), Nanjing, China, 11–13 November 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  68. Sonkamble, A.A.; Sonsale, R.P.; Kanshette, M.S.; Kabara, K.B.; Wananje, K.H.; Kumbharkhane, A.C.; Sarode, A. Relaxation dynamics and thermophysical properties of vegetable oils using time-domain reflectometry. Eur. Biophys. J. 2016, 46, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xu, X.-Q.; Tran, V.H.; Palmer, M.; White, K.; Salisbury, P. Chemical and physical analyses and sensory evaluation of six deep-frying oils. J Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1999, 76, 1091–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ibrahim, N.A.; Zaini, M.A.A. Microwave-assisted solvent extraction of castor oil from castor seeds. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 26, 2516–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Multilayer structure of the proposed SSPP microwave sensor for dielectric constant sensing.
Figure 1. Multilayer structure of the proposed SSPP microwave sensor for dielectric constant sensing.
Sensors 21 05477 g001
Figure 2. (a) Proposed unit cell; (b) unit cell of comb-like structure; (c) dispersion curves of comb-like and proposed unit cells for values of period d in the range 2.5–10 mm; (d) dispersion curves of comb-like and proposed unit cells with period d = 7.5 mm for different values of dielectric constant of sample εr = 1–5; (e) surface plasmon frequencies dependence on dielectric constant for the proposed and comb-like unit cells. (f) Spectral positions of transmission zeros for final sensor structure.
Figure 2. (a) Proposed unit cell; (b) unit cell of comb-like structure; (c) dispersion curves of comb-like and proposed unit cells for values of period d in the range 2.5–10 mm; (d) dispersion curves of comb-like and proposed unit cells with period d = 7.5 mm for different values of dielectric constant of sample εr = 1–5; (e) surface plasmon frequencies dependence on dielectric constant for the proposed and comb-like unit cells. (f) Spectral positions of transmission zeros for final sensor structure.
Sensors 21 05477 g002
Figure 3. Fabricated layers of SSPP sensor; (a) PMMA layer with the microfluidic reservoir; (b) 3M double-sided adhesive tape; (c) top layer made in PVC foil; (d) bottom layer made in PVC foil; (e) Layout of the final structure—top view; (f) layout of the final structure—bottom view.
Figure 3. Fabricated layers of SSPP sensor; (a) PMMA layer with the microfluidic reservoir; (b) 3M double-sided adhesive tape; (c) top layer made in PVC foil; (d) bottom layer made in PVC foil; (e) Layout of the final structure—top view; (f) layout of the final structure—bottom view.
Sensors 21 05477 g003
Figure 4. Measurement setup for the proposed sensor.
Figure 4. Measurement setup for the proposed sensor.
Sensors 21 05477 g004
Figure 5. Simulation and experimental results for edible oil samples.
Figure 5. Simulation and experimental results for edible oil samples.
Sensors 21 05477 g005
Figure 6. Simulation and experimental results for mixed palm and castor oil samples as listed in Table 1.
Figure 6. Simulation and experimental results for mixed palm and castor oil samples as listed in Table 1.
Sensors 21 05477 g006
Figure 7. Simulated and experimental spectral positions of transmission zeros for all measured samples.
Figure 7. Simulated and experimental spectral positions of transmission zeros for all measured samples.
Sensors 21 05477 g007
Table 1. Dielectric constants from literature and calculated values for oil mixtures.
Table 1. Dielectric constants from literature and calculated values for oil mixtures.
Sample NumberDiel. Const.tanδReference
Palm Oil1.800.03[67]
Olive oil1.820.04[68]
Sunflower oil1.860.03[69]
Castor oil20.08[70]
Mixed samplesDiel. Const.tanδRatio-Castor: Palm oil
Sample 11.840.041:3.5
Sample 21.870.041:2
Sample 31.930.062:1
Sample 41.960.073.5:1
Table 2. Comparison between recently proposed sensors for edible oil sensing with the proposed SSPP sensor.
Table 2. Comparison between recently proposed sensors for edible oil sensing with the proposed SSPP sensor.
ApplicationDesignTechnologyTechnology ComplexitySample Volume Sensitivity (MHz/ ε r ) Operating FrequencyRef.
Adulteration detectionDouble complementary SRRPCBMediumImmersed113311.56 GHz[10]
Characterization of Cooking oilsMetamaterial—SRRDesignedMediumEstimated:
0.01 mL
112030 GHz[14]
Determination of frying timeTransmission line—sensor 1PCBMediumImmersedEstimated
243
Estimated 5.45 GHz[15]
Determination of frying timeTransmission line—sensor 2PCBMediumImmersedEstimated
270
Estimated 5.45 GHz[15]
Identification of edible oilsMeta-surface absorberPCBMediumEstimated
<1 mL
5009.887 GHz[16]
Adulteration detectionEBG-inspired Patch resonatorPDMSHigh0.8 mL205.12.592 GHz[18]
Dielectric characterizationDouble SRRPCBMediumImmersed74.371.85 GHz[19]
Proposed sensorSSPPHybridSimple0.8 mL8506.32 GHz-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Podunavac, I.; Radonic, V.; Bengin, V.; Jankovic, N. Microwave Spoof Surface Plasmon Polariton-Based Sensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of Liquid Analyte Dielectric Constant. Sensors 2021, 21, 5477. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165477

AMA Style

Podunavac I, Radonic V, Bengin V, Jankovic N. Microwave Spoof Surface Plasmon Polariton-Based Sensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of Liquid Analyte Dielectric Constant. Sensors. 2021; 21(16):5477. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165477

Chicago/Turabian Style

Podunavac, Ivana, Vasa Radonic, Vesna Bengin, and Nikolina Jankovic. 2021. "Microwave Spoof Surface Plasmon Polariton-Based Sensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of Liquid Analyte Dielectric Constant" Sensors 21, no. 16: 5477. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165477

APA Style

Podunavac, I., Radonic, V., Bengin, V., & Jankovic, N. (2021). Microwave Spoof Surface Plasmon Polariton-Based Sensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of Liquid Analyte Dielectric Constant. Sensors, 21(16), 5477. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165477

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop