Next Article in Journal
Vivaldi Antenna Arrays Feed by Frequency-Independent Phase Shifter for High Directivity and Gain Used in Microwave Sensing and Communication Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Soil Moisture Content Retrieval from Remote Sensing Data by Artificial Neural Network Based on Sample Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
Fault-Adaptive Autonomy in Systems with Learning-Enabled Components
Previous Article in Special Issue
Histogram Adjustment of Images for Improving Photogrammetric Reconstruction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study

by
Riccardo Roncella
* and
Gianfranco Forlani
Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(18), 6090; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186090
Submission received: 5 July 2021 / Revised: 6 September 2021 / Accepted: 7 September 2021 / Published: 11 September 2021

Abstract

Acknowledged guidelines and standards such as those formerly governing project planning in analogue aerial photogrammetry are still missing in UAV photogrammetry. The reasons are many, from a great variety of projects goals to the number of parameters involved: camera features, flight plan design, block control and georeferencing options, Structure from Motion settings, etc. Above all, perhaps, stands camera calibration with the alternative between pre- and on-the-job approaches. In this paper we present a Monte Carlo simulation study where the accuracy estimation of camera parameters and tie points’ ground coordinates is evaluated as a function of various project parameters. A set of UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) synthetic photogrammetric blocks, built by varying terrain shape, surveyed area shape, block control (ground and aerial), strip type (longitudinal, cross and oblique), image observation and control data precision has been synthetically generated, overall considering 144 combinations in on-the-job self-calibration. Bias in ground coordinates (dome effect) due to inaccurate pre-calibration has also been investigated. Under the test scenario, the accuracy gap between different block configurations can be close to an order of magnitude. Oblique imaging is confirmed as key requisite in flat terrain, while ground control density is not. Aerial control by accurate camera station positions is overall more accurate and efficient than GCP in flat terrain.
Keywords: UAV; photogrammetry; camera calibration; GNSS-assisted block orientation; dome effect; Monte Carlo simulation UAV; photogrammetry; camera calibration; GNSS-assisted block orientation; dome effect; Monte Carlo simulation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roncella, R.; Forlani, G. UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study. Sensors 2021, 21, 6090. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186090

AMA Style

Roncella R, Forlani G. UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study. Sensors. 2021; 21(18):6090. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roncella, Riccardo, and Gianfranco Forlani. 2021. "UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study" Sensors 21, no. 18: 6090. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186090

APA Style

Roncella, R., & Forlani, G. (2021). UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study. Sensors, 21(18), 6090. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186090

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop