Next Article in Journal
A Partition Based Gradient Compression Algorithm for Distributed Training in AIoT
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in CRP Biosensor Based on Electrical, Electrochemical and Optical Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Void Avoidance Opportunistic Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of an IL-6 Biomarker Using a GFET Platform Developed with a Facile Organic Solvent-Free Aptamer Immobilization Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Surface Potential-Controlled Oscillation in FET-Based Biosensors

1
Department of Electronic Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Korea
2
Center for Nanotechnology, NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA 94035, USA
3
Department of Electronics Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sensors 2021, 21(6), 1939; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21061939
Submission received: 10 February 2021 / Revised: 5 March 2021 / Accepted: 5 March 2021 / Published: 10 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Field Effect Transistor (FET)-Based Biosensors)

Abstract

:
Field-effect transistor (FET)-based biosensors have garnered significant attention for their label-free electrical detection of charged biomolecules. Whereas conventional output parameters such as threshold voltage and channel current have been widely used for the detection and quantitation of analytes of interest, they require bulky instruments and specialized readout circuits, which often limit point-of-care testing applications. In this study, we demonstrate a simple conversion method that transforms the surface potential into an oscillating signal as an output of the FET-based biosensor. The oscillation frequency is proposed as a parameter for FET-based biosensors owing to its intrinsic advantages of simple and compact implementation of readout circuits as well as high compatibility with neuromorphic applications. An extended-gate biosensor comprising an Al2O3-deposited sensing electrode and a readout transistor is connected to a ring oscillator that generates surface potential-controlled oscillation for pH sensing. Electrical measurement of the oscillation frequency as a function of pH reveals that the oscillation frequency can be used as a sensitive and reliable output parameter in FET-based biosensors for the detection of chemical and biological species. We confirmed that the oscillation frequency is directly correlated with the threshold voltage. For signal amplification, the effects of circuit parameters on pH sensitivity are investigated using different methods, including electrical measurements, analytical calculations, and circuit simulations. An Arduino board to measure the oscillation frequency is integrated with the proposed sensor to enable portable and real-time pH measurement for point-of-care testing applications.

1. Introduction

Field-effect transistor (FET)-based biosensors have received significant attention for their label-free electrical detection of chemical and biological species. Because of their inherent similarity with conventional FETs in terms of device structure and fabrication process, FET-based biosensors offer the well-known advantages of modern electronic devices such as high-density integration of sensor arrays in a compact size, reliable fabrication with high reproducibility, and low-cost mass fabrication. The replacement of the solid-state gate of a conventional FET to the liquid–solid interface allows an FET-based biosensor to have an open surface for detecting chemical reactions or biological binding of interest. Since the invention of ion-sensitive field-effect transistors that facilitate the detection of ions by P. Bergveld in 1970 [1], FET-based biosensors have been widely utilized for detecting antibody–antigen [2,3,4], DNA [5,6], and viruses [7,8,9] for disease diagnosis, basic research, and point-of-care testing (POCT). Advanced nanotechnology and the discovery of new materials have improved sensing performances such as sensitivity and limit of detection by the incorporation of silicon nanowires [10,11,12], carbon nanotubes [13,14], graphene [15,16,17], two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide [18,19], and metal oxide nanostructures [20,21,22] into basic elements of FET-based biosensors.
An FET-based biosensor transduces a binding event occurring on the gate surface into a change in the electrical characteristics, such as the threshold voltage or channel current [23,24,25]. For example, the reversible binding of hydrogen ions on the active sites of a gate (i.e., ion-sensitive membrane) results in a change in the surface potential of the channel; this phenomenon can be utilized in developing pH sensors [26,27]. When a receptor functionalized on an FET surface captures its analyte, the intrinsic charge of the analyte changes the surface potential of the FET. This mechanism enables label-free electrical detection of antibody-antigen binding and DNA binding [5,10,11]. Binding-induced conformational changes (i.e., aptamers) result in changes in the local potential near the FET surface [28,29,30]. The existence and quantity of analytes in a test solution are correlated with the amount of change in the threshold voltage or channel current. Hence, the threshold voltage and channel current have been widely used as output parameters for FET-based biosensors.
Among several methods for monitoring the threshold voltage and channel current, a parameter analyzer, which is a specialized equipment for characterizing the electrical properties of FET devices, is widely used for extracting output parameters owing to its precision measurement with high resolution [31,32,33]. However, its bulky size and exorbitant cost limit POCT applications. As an alternative for POCT applications, readout circuits for monitoring output parameters have been constructed in the form of small-sized integrated circuits (ICs) by using modern electronics technology [34,35]. Despite the portability of ICs, their customized fabrication and high cost in design and development limit their generic use in readout circuits.
The sensing process outputs analog values of both voltage and current readings. Subsequently, these analog values are digitalized using a readout circuit. Traditionally, the analog output is input into an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) to interface with digital electronics. This is associated with the fact that the traditional computer architecture, i.e., the von Neumann architecture, has long evolved digitally to countermeasure noise immunity. Recently, the neuromorphic architecture has attracted significant attention in mimicking the neurobiological structure of the nerve system [36,37,38,39,40]. One of the neuromorphic architectures is the spiking-neural network [41,42], which mimics the natural neural network the most. When the traditional ADC is integrated with the neuromorphic architecture, the ADC levels must be converted into spiking rates, thereby resulting in circuit inefficiency, propagation delay, and power consumption. Therefore, an alternative method that is the most compatible with spiking neural networks must be identified.
In this study, we demonstrate a signal conversion scheme using frequency as a new output parameter of FET-based biosensors to complement the conventional output parameters. The simple connection of a ring oscillator to a readout transistor enables the conversion from a surface potential to an oscillation signal. The oscillation frequency can be regarded as the spiking rate of the neural network. Hence, the frequency and spiking rate can be used interchangeably. The spiking rate as an output can be input into the axillary spiking neural network. To demonstrate the spiking rate altered by biosensing, in this study, the oscillation frequency is measured using a portable, general-purpose microcontroller (i.e., Arduino) by counting the number of peaks in a given time. Electrical measurement of the linear correlation between the oscillation frequency and pH value confirms that the oscillation frequency is a suitable output parameter for FET-based biosensors. We discuss the change in the pH sensitivity of the oscillation frequency based on experiments, analytical calculations, and circuit simulations. Finally, we present the future prospects of using the oscillation frequency in portable sensing systems based on real-time pH measurements using an Arduino board operated via open source codes.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Fabrication of Sensing Electrodes

The fabrication of pH-sensitive electrodes was based on our previous study [9,43]. Briefly, a 15-nm-thick Al2O3 layer was deposited on metal electrodes (Cr/Au = 3 nm/100 nm) via electron beam evaporation. The dimensions of the metal electrodes were 3 mm × 3 mm or 5 mm × 5 mm. A reservoir to fill the test solution was constructed on the Al2O3 sensing layer using a silicone elastomer (Kwik-cast, World Precision Instruments, Inc., Sarasota, FL, USA). Optical microscopy images of the fabricated sensing electrodes are presented in Supplementary Materials (Figure S1).

2.2. Construction of Frequency Measurement System

A schematic illustration of the experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. A pH buffer solution was added to the reservoir constructed on the sensing electrode, and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode (MF-2052, Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., West Lafayette, IN, USA) was immersed in the test solution. The probing pad of the fabricated sensing electrode was connected to the gate terminal of a commercially available n-type FET (CD4007UBE, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA), which was used as a readout transistor to convert the surface potential of the sensing electrode to the drain current (ID). This configuration is known as the extended-gate FET [44]. The control voltage (Vctrl) terminal of a three-stage ring oscillator (CD4007UBE, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA) was connected to the drain terminal of the readout transistor, where the load resistor was connected. Two separate CD4007UBE devices were used to construct the readout transistor and three-stage ring oscillator. The ring oscillator arrangement using CD4007UBE devices is provided in Supplementary Materials (Figure S7b).

2.3. Electrical Characterization

A liquid-gate voltage (VLG) was applied to the reference electrode, and a supply voltage (VDD) was applied to the load resistor connected to the drain terminal of the readout transistor using with a SourceMeter (Model 2614B, Keithley Instruments, Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA). The voltage drop in the load resistor determined the Vctrl input to the ring oscillator. The oscillation frequency of the ring oscillator was measured at the output terminal of the ring oscillator using an oscilloscope (EDUX1002A, Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). The threshold voltage (VT), which is defined as the gate voltage that flows a ID of 100 nA in the subthreshold region, was extracted using the SourceMeter by sweeping the VLG and measuring the ID after removing the load resistor and ring oscillator.

2.4. Portable Sensing System

An Arduino board (Arduino Uno R3, Arduino LLC, Somerville, MA, USA), which is a general-purpose microcontroller, was used to construct a portable sensing system to measure the oscillation frequency. A liquid crystal display (LCD) module (SZH-EK101, SMG, China) was connected to an Arduino board to display the measured frequency. All components including the sensing electrode, readout transistor, three-stage ring oscillator, Arduino board, and LCD module were integrated on a printed circuit board (PCB). A 9 V battery was used to supply power to each component. The detailed Arduino board-pin mapping and the applied voltages are shown in Figure S7. The Arduino source codes that counted the number of oscillations were uploaded to the Arduino board where the LCD was connected to display the oscillation frequency according to the pH. The Arduino source codes for the frequency measurement are provided in Supplementary Materials.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Operation Principle: Surface Potential-Controlled Oscillation

Compared with conventional FET-based biosensors, a distinctive feature of the proposed biosensor is the parameter conversion scheme constructed using a ring oscillator that converts the VT or ID to the oscillation frequency (Figure 1). Although we used a three-stage ring oscillator, it was not necessarily the best option. The number of stages allows the system designer to select the spiking rate of interest. Alternatively, increasing the supply voltage at a specified oscillator can be a method to increase the nominal point of the spiking rate. As the odd number of stages increases, the oscillation frequency can be decreased. The typical frequency range can vary from low frequency (~20 Hz), audio frequency (20 Hz–20 kHz), and up to radio frequency (100 kHz–100 GHz). Furthermore, other types of oscillators such as the resistor-capacitor or inductor-capacitor, or variations of the ring oscillator can be used as requred. The oscillation frequency can be measured using not only a bulky oscilloscope, but also using a compact, portable general-purpose microprocessor (i.e., Arduino board); this will be discussed later.
The operating mechanisms of extended-gate biosensors have been investigated previously [24]. A change in the surface potential of the sensing electrode upon the binding of chemical and biological species results in a change in the threshold voltage, consequently modulating the ID of the readout transistor. The new components, i.e., the ring oscillator and load resistor, incorporated in the output of the extended-gate biosensor convert the ID to the oscillation frequency. The amount of ID flowing through the load resistor determines the voltage at the drain terminal (i.e., Vctrl), which is the supply voltage of the subsequent ring oscillator where the oscillation frequency is changed by the value of Vctrl. In the entire procedure, the surface potential of the sensing electrode results in an oscillation frequency, indicating that the frequency can be utilized as a new output parameter for FET-based biosensors.

3.2. pH Sensing Characteristics

We investigated the relationship between the oscillation frequency of the proposed sensor and the pH value of the test solution to verify the feasibility of the oscillation frequency as an output parameter for FET-based biosensors. The pH sensing experiment is a popular proof-of-concept example that confirms the ability of the newly designed sensor in detecting charged biomolecules [9,10,43]. With an increase in the pH value of the buffer solution, the output signal, which is the output voltage as a function of time, shifted to the left, thereby increasing the oscillation frequency (Figure 2a,b). The frequency depended linearly on the pH value, with high reproducibility (Figure 2b,c).
Our additional experiments revealed that the oscillation frequency was directly correlated with VT. The same sensing electrode used to obtain Figure 2a,b shows a similar trend in terms of the linear dependence of VT on pH (Figure S2). The pH-induced VT shift can be explained by site-binding theory, in which hydrogen ions reversibly bind to active OH sites on the Al2O3 surface, thereby generating a surface potential based on pH [26,45]. When a sensing electrode indicates a nonlinear dependence of VT on pH due to undesired defects on the surface, the oscillation frequency as a function of pH exhibits the same nonlinear trend, which does not facilitate correct measurements (Figure S3). This result implies that the preparation of sensing electrodes that generate sensitive and reliable surface potentials is crucial in the design of high-performance surface potential-controlled oscillations.
Further measurements indicate that VT modulated the oscillation frequency. The oscillation frequency of the ring oscillator was proportional to the gate voltage (VG) of the readout transistor via the transfer of VG into Vctrl (Figure S4). It is noteworthy that changing VG in these measurements can be considered as a pH-induced VT shift because VT is defined as the effective VG that flows a constant ID. The close relationship between VT and oscillation frequency allows the frequency to be a versatile output parameter without sacrificing the advantages of VT in FET-based biosensors.
Although we simply measured a small pH range of 4 to 9 to demonstrate surface potential-controlled oscillation, the Al2O3-deposited sensing electrode can detect a wider pH range of 3 to 11, as confirmed by the pH sensing characteristics of our previous study [46]. The maximum VT shift (i.e., voltage signal) is measured as ~0.4 V from pH 3 to 11. A curve for the oscillation frequency as a function of the gate voltage (Figure S4d) shows that an input signal larger than 0.5 V can be linearly converted to the oscillation frequency. Because the allowed input voltage for linear frequency conversion is larger than the maximum voltage signal generated from the sensing electrode, our sensor is expected to measure the pH response of the Al2O3 surface over a pH range of 3 to 11.
It is expected that the pH sensitivity depends on the temperature because the surface potential ( ψ o ) of the sensing electrode can be described with the Nernst equation [26]:
ψ o = 2.303 k T q log [ a H + / a H + o ]
where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, q is the elementary charge, a H + is the solution’s ion activity, and a H + o is the ion activity at the point of zero charge. In our previous study, the Al2O3-deposited electrode generated 43.7 mV/pH at 25 °C (298 K) and 45.4 mV/pH at 40 °C (313 K), where the pH sensitivity improvement by 4% is similar to the Nernst equation-derived calculation by 5% [46]. A similar temperature dependence on pH sensitivity has been reported elsewhere [27]. This temperature instability should be further compensated in a readout circuit by measuring the test solution temperature.
It is possible to detect biomolecular interactions in real time if the sensing electrode is functionalized with receptors to capture target biomolecules. However, nonspecific binding of interfering biomolecules present in serum and blood generates noises to deteriorate detection sensitivity. To prevent nonspecific binding on the sensing electrode, the remaining binding sites on the surface are generally blocked by a bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution [32,47]. In addition, tailoring the sensor surface with a polymer polyethylene glycol (PEG) can further reduce nonspecific signals from interfering biomolecules owing to the hydrophilic PEG on the surface, which enables real-time immunodetection in whole serum [47,48].

3.3. Signal Amplification

Understanding the effects of circuit parameters on the frequency signal is important when establishihng methods for signal amplification. Unlike the VT signal, which requires dual gates for siginal amplificaiton [12,25,49,50], the single-gate configuration is sufficient for increasing the frequency sensitivity in units of Hz/pH by controlling the values of other circuit parameters, such as the number of stages (N), load resistance (RD), and VLG.
Figure 3a shows the frequency as a function of pH for N = 3, 5, and 7. The sensitivity increased as N decreased (Figure 3b). The frequency of the ring oscillator (f) can be modeled as f = 1 / (2Ntp), where tp is the propagation delay time per stage. Let us assume that the per-stage delay change from the initial value is Δtp = tptp,i at a given pH. Therefore, the frequency change, i.e., the sensitivity, Δf = –Δtp / (2Ntptp,i). Because tp and tp,i are independent of N, the simple frequency change model reveals that a lower N results in a higher sensitivity. Despite its lower sensitivity at N = 7, its lower operating frequency implies that high-performance circuits are not necessitated for measuring high frequencies, hence the tradeoff between sensitivity and operating frequency in terms of N.
Similar pH sensing experiments were performed to investigate the effect of RD on sensitivity (Figure 3c). Figure 3d shows that the sensitivity increased with RD. The oscillation frequency is a function of power effectively delivered by Vctrl, where Vctrl is obtained using the voltage divider circuit of the resistances of the load resistor and readout transistor. The voltage divider model of Vctrl can be expressed asVctrl / VDD = RT / (RD + RT), where RT is a function of ID or VT of the readout transistor. Consequently, a higher RD results in a lower operation frequency. The effect of the load resistor on the sensitivity can be directly explained based on Vctrl. In other words, the gain of the readout is translated into the pH sensitivity. The small voltage variation due to the pH value multiplied by the transconductance gm of the readout transistor is the ID variation. According to Ohm’s law (V = IR), for the voltage divider of the load resistor and readout transistor, the ID variation multiplied by the load resistance yields Vctrl variation. Consequently, the gain of the readout circuit or sensitivity is gmRD. A higher transconductance and a higher RD result in a more sensitive sensor. However, when RD is excessively large, the voltage drop across the load resistor can be dominant, and Vctrl becomes extremely low. In this case, the swing of Vctrl and the sensor resolution can be limited. In extreme cases, Vctrl can vary nonlinearly with pH because of the small swing.
Finally, the effect of VLG on sensitivity was analyzed, as shown in Figure 3e. Figure 3f shows that the sensitivity increases with the VLG. As explained earlier, the gain of the readout transistor or the sensitivity of the sensor is gmRD, where gm increases with the DC gate bias of the readout transistor. However, if the DC gate bias increases significant, more ID will flow and the gain will be compromised by power consumption. This is particularly important if the sensor is intended for an always-on application. In addition, similar to the voltage swing of Vctrl being constrained by a high RD, a high gm yields the same result. Therefore, the tradeoff between sensitivity and nonlinearity/resolution/power consumption must be considered.
These experiments were consistent with an analytical equation that indicates the same dependence of the circuit parameters (N, RD, and VLG) on the frequency sensitivity (See Section 3.4):
d f d p H ( V L G V T ) R D N ,
where VT is the threshold voltage of the readout transistor. Furthermore, the circuit simulations exhibited the same effects of the circuit parameters (N, RD, and VLG) on the frequency sensitivity (Figure S5). Understanding of signal amplification will be beneficial to the future design of highly sensitive frequency-based biosensors.

3.4. Analytical Equation for Investigating Effects of Circuit Parameters on Sensitivity

To increase the sensitivity of the sensor, we derived a theoretical equation to express the effect of each circuit parameter on the sensitivity. The sensitivity can be calculated by taking the derivative of the oscillation frequency (f) with respect to the pH, as follows:
d f d p H = d V T d p H d V c t r l d V T d f d V c t r l = α d V c t r l d V T d f d V c t r l
where α = dVT / dpH is the pH sensitivity of the Al2O3 sensing layer caused by a pH-based surface potential change.
The drain current ID of the readout transistor biased in saturation is expressed as
I D = 1 2 μ n C o x W L ( V L G V T ) 2 = k 2 ( V L G V T ) 2
where μn is the mobility of the electrons in the inversion layer, Cox the oxide capacitance, W the channel length, and L the channel width, and parameter k = μnCoxW / L includes geometry and technology-dependent parameters.
When the drain current ID that flows through the load resistor RD causes a voltage drop across the resistor, the control voltage Vctrl can be expressed as
V c t r l = V D D I D R D = V D D k 2 ( V L G V T ) 2 R D
Subsequently, the second term in Equation (1) can be calculated by taking the derivative with respect to VT as follows:
d V c t r l d V T = k ( V L G V T ) R D
The oscillation frequency f is expressed as
f = 1 2 N t p
where N is the number of stages, and tp is the propagation delay per stage. The delay time tp is a function of the load capacitance (CL), supply voltage of the ring oscillator (Vctrl), and drain current (IDsat) that flows through the ring oscillator, as follows [51]:
t p = C L V c t r l 2 I D s a t = C L V c t r l k ( V c t r l V T 0 ) 2
where VT0 is the ring oscillator threshold voltage. It is noteworthy that the ring oscillator has the same initial threshold voltage as the readout transistor because the same n-type transistors (CD4007UBE, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA) are used. However, in contrast to VT, VT0 is not a function of pH.
Substituting Equation (6) into Equation (5) yields
f = 1 2 N k ( V c t r l V T 0 ) 2 C L V c t r l
Subsequently, the third term in Equation (1) can be calculated by taking the derivative with respect to Vctrl:
d f d V c t r l = k 2 N C L 1 V T 0 2 V c t r l 2 k 2 N C L
Finally, the sensitivity equation is obtained using Equations (1), (4), and (8) as follows:
d f d p H = α k 2 2 N C L ( V L G V T ) R D
The sensitivity increases as the number of stages N decreases, the load resistance RD increases, and the liquid-gate voltage VLG increases.

3.5. pH Sensing Using Portable System

A portable pH sensing system was constructed by replacing the bulky oscilloscope for the frequency measurement with a compact Arduino board, a general-purpose microprocessor capable of counting the number of oscillations via open-source codes (Figure 4a,b). Figure 4b shows that all the components for pH sensing, except the reference electrode, were integrated on a PCB board, on which the LCD screen was mounted to display the frequency measured according to the pH value of the test solution. The oscillation frequency in the portable sensing system increased with the pH value (Figure 4c), showing the same trend as that of the oscilloscope. The portable sensing system successfully demonstrated the real-time measurement of the pH response with high reproducibility (Figure 4d).
However, the portable sensing system requires futher developments for practical applications. First, the bulky Ag/AgCl reference electrode should be miniaturized to a compact size. Recent studies have demonstrated such miniaturization using an integrated on-chip gold gate [52] or an integrated fluidic chamber comprising an agarose gel sealed with a UV-curable resign [53], which is compatible with our sensor fabrication. Second, the accuracy of the frequency measurement of the portable sensing system should be further improved such at it can detect target analytes in a small dynamic range of interest [54]. Because the output waveform of the ring oscillator is not an ideal sinusoidal waveform (Figure 2a), some errors may be generated during frequency extraction; however, they will be rectified via noise reduction using a Schmitt trigger (Figure S6).
Wireless signal transmission can be simply and inexpensively implemented by connecting a Bluetooth module to the Arduino and using a smartphone application [55,56]. Through the Bluetooth connection between the Arduino and the smartphone, sensing data from the Arduino can be transferred to the smartphone screen instead of the LCD, which will be a subject of our further work (Figure S8). This platform not only receives sensing data in real time, but is also promising and versatile for POCT applications.

4. Conclusions

We demonstrated a conversion method that enables surface potential-controlled oscillations to provide the oscillation frequency as an output parameter for FET-based biosensors. Unlike conventional parameters such as VT and ID, the oscillation frequency requires neither bulky and expensive analysis equipment nor complicated and specified ICs. However, it is compatible with open-source electronics platforms such as the Arduino board. The ring oscillator connected to the extended-gate biosensor can convert the pH-induced surface potential generated in the Al2O3 layer of the extended gate into an oscillation signal. The proposed sensor demonstrated sensitive and reliable pH sensing based on the linear dependence of the oscillation frequency on pH, suggesting the usefulness of the oscillation frequency for the analysis of FET-based biosensors. Our comparison of the VT signal and oscillation frequency revealed that they were directly correlated with each other as well as with the surface potential, and that the sensing electrode that can produce a higher surface potential was key for signal amplification. The pH sensing experiments, analytical calculations, and circuit simulations confirmed that the frequency signal upon the pH response can be further amplified by controlling the circuit parameters, such as by reducing N, increasing RD, and increasing VLG. A portable sensing system for real-time pH measurement was constructed on a PCB board by integrating an extended-gate biosensor and an Arduino board to measure the frequency signal. The surface potential-controlled oscillation in this study is suitable for not only POCT applications, but also neuromorphic applications based on spiking neural networks.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/6/1939/s1, Figure S1: Optical microscopy images of sensing electrode, Figure S2: pH sensing characteristics of extended-gate FET with Al2O3 layer, Figure S3: Comparison between threshold voltage and oscillation frequency, Figure S4: Conversion of gate voltage to oscillation frequency, Figure S5: PSpice simulations for investigating effects of circuit parameters on sensitivity, Figure S6: Comparison between performances of oscilloscope and Arduino, Figure S7: Arduino board-pin mapping, Arduino source codes for frequency measurement, and Figure S8: Wireless signal transmission.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-W.H. and J.-H.A.; formal analysis, J.H.K. and S.J.P.; investigation, J.H.K. and S.J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.H.K. and S.J.P.; writing—review and editing, J.-W.H. and J.-H.A.; supervision, J.-H.A.; funding acquisition, J.-H.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT; Ministry of Science and ICT) (No. 2020R1F1A1068242). This work was also supported by Nano-Material Technology Development Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (No. 2009-0082580). This work was partially supported by research fund of Chungnam National University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data collected in this study are presented within this article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Bergveld, P. Development of an ion-sensitive solid-state device for neurophysiological measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1970, 1, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zheng, G.; Patolsky, F.; Cui, Y.; Wang, W.U.; Lieber, C.M. Multiplexed electrical detection of cancer markers with nanowire sensor arrays. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, A.; Ah, C.S.; Yu, H.Y.; Yang, J.-H.; Baek, I.-B.; Ahn, C.-G.; Park, C.W.; Jun, M.S.; Lee, S. Ultrasensitive, label-free, and real-time immunodetection using silicon field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 103901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tarasov, A.; Gray, D.W.; Tsai, M.-Y.; Shields, N.; Montrose, A.; Creedon, N.; Lovera, P.; O’Riordan, A.; Mooney, M.H.; Vogel, E.M. A potentiometric biosensor for rapid on-site disease diagnostics. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 79, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hahm, J.-i.; Lieber, C.M. Direct ultrasensitive electrical detection of DNA and DNA sequence variations using nanowire nanosensors. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Uslu, F.; Ingebrandt, S.; Mayer, D.; Böcker-Meffert, S.; Odenthal, M.; Offenhäusser, A. Labelfree fully electronic nucleic acid detection system based on a field-effect transistor device. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2004, 19, 1723–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Patolsky, F.; Zheng, G.; Hayden, O.; Lakadamyali, M.; Zhuang, X.; Lieber, C.M. Electrical detection of single viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 14017–14022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Gu, B.; Park, T.J.; Ahn, J.H.; Huang, X.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Choi, Y.K. Nanogap field-effect transistor biosensors for electrical detection of avian influenza. Small 2009, 5, 2407–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kwon, J.; Lee, Y.; Lee, T.; Ahn, J.-H. Aptamer-based field-effect transistor for detection of avian influenza virus in chicken serum. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 5524–5531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cui, Y.; Wei, Q.; Park, H.; Lieber, C.M. Nanowire nanosensors for highly sensitive and selective detection of biological and chemical species. Science 2001, 293, 1289–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stern, E.; Klemic, J.F.; Routenberg, D.A.; Wyrembak, P.N.; Turner-Evans, D.B.; Hamilton, A.D.; LaVan, D.A.; Fahmy, T.M.; Reed, M.A. Label-free immunodetection with CMOS-compatible semiconducting nanowires. Nature 2007, 445, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ahn, J.-H.; Choi, S.-J.; Han, J.-W.; Park, T.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Choi, Y.-K. Double-gate nanowire field effect transistor for a biosensor. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 2934–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Star, A.; Gabriel, J.-C.P.; Bradley, K.; Grüner, G. Electronic detection of specific protein binding using nanotube FET devices. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 459–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cho, Y.; Pham Ba, V.A.; Jeong, J.-Y.; Choi, Y.; Hong, S. Ion-Selective Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors for Monitoring Drug Effects on Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Activation in Live Cells. Sensors 2020, 20, 3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ang, P.K.; Chen, W.; Wee, A.T.S.; Loh, K.P. Solution-gated epitaxial graphene as pH sensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14392–14393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ping, J.; Vishnubhotla, R.; Vrudhula, A.; Johnson, A.C. Scalable production of high-sensitivity, label-free DNA biosensors based on back-gated graphene field effect transistors. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 8700–8704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ohno, Y.; Maehashi, K.; Yamashiro, Y.; Matsumoto, K. Electrolyte-gated graphene field-effect transistors for detecting pH and protein adsorption. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3318–3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sarkar, D.; Liu, W.; Xie, X.; Anselmo, A.C.; Mitragotri, S.; Banerjee, K. MoS2 field-effect transistor for next-generation label-free biosensors. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3992–4003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chen, Y.; Ren, R.; Pu, H.; Chang, J.; Mao, S.; Chen, J. Field-effect transistor biosensors with two-dimensional black phosphorus nanosheets. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 89, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Kim, J.; Rim, Y.S.; Chen, H.; Cao, H.H.; Nakatsuka, N.; Hinton, H.L.; Zhao, C.; Andrews, A.M.; Yang, Y.; Weiss, P.S. Fabrication of high-performance ultrathin In2O3 film field-effect transistors and biosensors using chemical lift-off lithography. Acs Nano 2015, 9, 4572–4582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Li, C.; Curreli, M.; Lin, H.; Lei, B.; Ishikawa, F.; Datar, R.; Cote, R.J.; Thompson, M.E.; Zhou, C. Complementary detection of prostate-specific antigen using In2O3 nanowires and carbon nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12484–12485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Q.; Aroonyadet, N.; Song, Y.; Wang, X.; Cao, X.; Liu, Y.; Cong, S.; Wu, F.; Thompson, M.E.; Zhou, C. Highly sensitive and quick detection of acute myocardial infarction biomarkers using In2O3 nanoribbon biosensors fabricated using shadow masks. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 10117–10125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nair, P.R.; Alam, M.A. Design considerations of silicon nanowire biosensors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2007, 54, 3400–3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kaisti, M. Detection principles of biological and chemical FET sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 98, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ahn, J.-H.; Choi, B.; Choi, S.-J. Understanding the signal amplification in dual-gate FET-based biosensors. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 184502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, S.; Bomer, J.G.; Carlen, E.T.; van den Berg, A. Al2O3/silicon nanoISFET with near ideal Nernstian response. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2334–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tarasov, A.; Wipf, M.; Bedner, K.; Kurz, J.; Fu, W.; Guzenko, V.A.; Knopfmacher, O.; Stoop, R.L.; Calame, M.; Schönenberger, C. True Reference Nanosensor Realized with Silicon Nanowires. Langmuir 2012, 28, 9899–9905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. So, H.-M.; Won, K.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, B.-K.; Ryu, B.H.; Na, P.S.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.-O. Single-walled carbon nanotube biosensors using aptamers as molecular recognition elements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11906–11907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Goda, T.; Miyahara, Y. A hairpin DNA aptamer coupled with groove binders as a smart switch for a field-effect transistor biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 32, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nakatsuka, N.; Yang, K.-A.; Abendroth, J.M.; Cheung, K.M.; Xu, X.; Yang, H.; Zhao, C.; Zhu, B.; Rim, Y.S.; Yang, Y. Aptamer–field-effect transistors overcome Debye length limitations for small-molecule sensing. Science 2018, 362, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Han, S.H.; Kim, S.K.; Park, K.; Yi, S.Y.; Park, H.-J.; Lyu, H.-K.; Kim, M.; Chung, B.H. Detection of mutant p53 using field-effect transistor biosensor. Ana. Chim. Acta 2010, 665, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, Y.-W.; Wu, C.-S.; Chuang, C.-K.; Pang, S.-T.; Pan, T.-M.; Yang, Y.-S.; Ko, F.-H. Real-Time and Label-Free Detection of the Prostate-Specific Antigen in Human Serum by a Polycrystalline Silicon Nanowire Field-Effect Transistor Biosensor. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 7912–7918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cai, B.; Huang, L.; Zhang, H.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, G.-J. Gold nanoparticles-decorated graphene field-effect transistor biosensor for femtomolar MicroRNA detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 74, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rothberg, J.M.; Hinz, W.; Rearick, T.M.; Schultz, J.; Mileski, W.; Davey, M.; Leamon, J.H.; Johnson, K.; Milgrew, M.J.; Edwards, M. An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing. Nature 2011, 475, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, H.; Liu, X.; Li, L.; Mu, X.; Genov, R.; Mason, A.J. CMOS electrochemical instrumentation for biosensor microsystems: A review. Sensors 2017, 17, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kim, Y.; Chortos, A.; Xu, W.; Liu, Y.; Oh, J.Y.; Son, D.; Kang, J.; Foudeh, A.M.; Zhu, C.; Lee, Y. A bioinspired flexible organic artificial afferent nerve. Science 2018, 360, 998–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wan, C.; Chen, G.; Fu, Y.; Wang, M.; Matsuhisa, N.; Pan, S.; Pan, L.; Yang, H.; Wan, Q.; Zhu, L. An artificial sensory neuron with tactile perceptual learning. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Seo, S.; Jo, S.-H.; Kim, S.; Shim, J.; Oh, S.; Kim, J.-H.; Heo, K.; Choi, J.-W.; Choi, C.; Oh, S. Artificial optic-neural synapse for colored and color-mixed pattern recognition. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yoon, J.H.; Wang, Z.; Kim, K.M.; Wu, H.; Ravichandran, V.; Xia, Q.; Hwang, C.S.; Yang, J.J. An artificial nociceptor based on a diffusive memristor. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, J.-K.; Geum, D.-M.; Lee, M.-W.; Yu, J.-M.; Kim, S.K.; Kim, S.; Choi, Y.-K. Bioinspired Photoresponsive Single Transistor Neuron for a Neuromorphic Visual System. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 8781–8788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bartolozzi, C.; Indiveri, G. Synaptic dynamics in analog VLSI. Neural Comput. 2007, 19, 2581–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Maass, W. Networks of spiking neurons: The third generation of neural network models. Neural Netw. 1997, 10, 1659–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kwon, J.; Lee, B.-H.; Kim, S.-Y.; Park, J.-Y.; Bae, H.; Choi, Y.-K.; Ahn, J.-H. Nanoscale FET-based transduction toward sensitive extended-gate biosensors. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 1724–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pullano, S.A.; Critello, C.D.; Mahbub, I.; Tasneem, N.T.; Shamsir, S.; Islam, S.K.; Greco, M.; Fiorillo, A.S. EGFET-based sensors for bioanalytical applications: A review. Sensors 2018, 18, 4042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Tarasov, A.; Wipf, M.; Stoop, R.L.; Bedner, K.; Fu, W.; Guzenko, V.A.; Knopfmacher, O.; Calame, M.; Schönenberger, C. Understanding the electrolyte background for biochemical sensing with ion-sensitive field-effect transistors. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 9291–9298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kwon, J.; Yoo, Y.K.; Lee, J.H.; Ahn, J.-H. pH Sensing Characteristics of Extended-Gate Field-Effect Transistor with Al2O3 Layer. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 6682–6686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gutiérrez-Sanz, Ó.; Andoy, N.M.; Filipiak, M.S.; Haustein, N.; Tarasov, A. Direct, Label-Free, and Rapid Transistor-Based Immunodetection in Whole Serum. ACS Sens. 2017, 2, 1278–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gao, N.; Gao, T.; Yang, X.; Dai, X.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, A.; Lieber, C.M. Specific detection of biomolecules in physiological solutions using graphene transistor biosensors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 14633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Spijkman, M.J.; Brondijk, J.J.; Geuns, T.C.; Smits, E.C.; Cramer, T.; Zerbetto, F.; Stoliar, P.; Biscarini, F.; Blom, P.W.; de Leeuw, D.M. Dual-gate organic field-effect transistors as potentiometric sensors in aqueous solution. Adv. Func. Mater. 2010, 20, 898–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Knopfmacher, O.; Tarasov, A.; Fu, W.; Wipf, M.; Niesen, B.; Calame, M.; Schonenberger, C. Nernst limit in dual-gated Si-nanowire FET sensors. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 2268–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Weste, N.H.; Harris, D. CMOS VLSI design: A circuits and systems perspective, 4th ed.; Pearson Education India: Chennai, India, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Wu, F.; Cao, X.; Li, Z.; Alharbi, M.; Abbas, A.N.; Amer, M.R.; Zhou, C. Highly sensitive and wearable In2O3 nanoribbon transistor biosensors with integrated on-chip gate for glucose monitoring in body fluids. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 1170–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Choi, D.-H.; Li, Y.; Cutting, G.R.; Searson, P.C. A wearable potentiometric sensor with integrated salt bridge for sweat chloride measurement. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 250, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Go, J.; Nair, P.R.; Reddy Jr, B.; Dorvel, B.; Bashir, R.; Alam, M.A. Coupled heterogeneous nanowire–nanoplate planar transistor sensors for giant (> 10 V/pH) Nernst response. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5972–5979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, D.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, L.; Li, S.; Yao, Y.; Jiang, J.; Liu, G.L.; Liu, Q. Protein detecting with smartphone-controlled electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for point-of-care applications. Sens. Actuators B 2016, 222, 994–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sahatiya, P.; Kadu, A.; Gupta, H.; Thanga Gomathi, P.; Badhulika, S. Flexible, Disposable Cellulose-Paper-Based MoS2/Cu2S Hybrid for Wireless Environmental Monitoring and Multifunctional Sensing of Chemical Stimuli. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 9048–9059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of surface potential-controlled oscillation. An extended gate (i.e., sensing electrode) that generates surface potential based on pH is connected to a readout transistor, where surface potential is converted to drain current (ID). Subsequently, ID that flows through the load resistor (RD) determines the control voltage (Vctrl), which is input to the ring oscillator that generates an oscillation signal. Oscillation frequency is utilized as an output parameter for pH sensing.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of surface potential-controlled oscillation. An extended gate (i.e., sensing electrode) that generates surface potential based on pH is connected to a readout transistor, where surface potential is converted to drain current (ID). Subsequently, ID that flows through the load resistor (RD) determines the control voltage (Vctrl), which is input to the ring oscillator that generates an oscillation signal. Oscillation frequency is utilized as an output parameter for pH sensing.
Sensors 21 01939 g001
Figure 2. pH sensing characteristics. (a) Output waveform of ring oscillator as a function of pH. Starting point of each curve overlapped at 0 s. Dotted line provides visual guidance of shift in period (inverse of frequency) due to pH. (b) Oscillation frequency vs. pH, showing linear slope of 34.1 kHz/pH. (c) Time-resolved pH measurement. pH sensing results confirmed ability of proposed sensor in detecting changes in surface potential.
Figure 2. pH sensing characteristics. (a) Output waveform of ring oscillator as a function of pH. Starting point of each curve overlapped at 0 s. Dotted line provides visual guidance of shift in period (inverse of frequency) due to pH. (b) Oscillation frequency vs. pH, showing linear slope of 34.1 kHz/pH. (c) Time-resolved pH measurement. pH sensing results confirmed ability of proposed sensor in detecting changes in surface potential.
Sensors 21 01939 g002
Figure 3. Effects of circuit parameters on sensitivity. (a) Oscillation frequency vs. pH for different numbers of stages (N). (b) Dependence of sensitivity on N. (c) Oscillation frequency vs. pH for different values of load resistance (RD). (d) Dependence of sensitivity on RD. (e) Oscillation frequency vs. pH for different values of liquid-gate voltage (VLG). (f) Dependence of sensitivity on VLG.
Figure 3. Effects of circuit parameters on sensitivity. (a) Oscillation frequency vs. pH for different numbers of stages (N). (b) Dependence of sensitivity on N. (c) Oscillation frequency vs. pH for different values of load resistance (RD). (d) Dependence of sensitivity on RD. (e) Oscillation frequency vs. pH for different values of liquid-gate voltage (VLG). (f) Dependence of sensitivity on VLG.
Sensors 21 01939 g003
Figure 4. Portable measurement system. (a) Schematic illustration of portable measurement system. Small-sized Arduino board to replace bulk-sized oscilloscope for measuring oscillation frequency of sensor; 9 V battery supplies power to circuit. Operating conditions were VDD = 3.3 V, VLG = 2 V, RD = 1 kΩ, and N = 3. (b) Optical image of portable measurement system. Measured frequency displayed on the LCD screen. (c) Oscillation frequency vs. pH. (d) Real-time measurement of pH using portable measurement system.
Figure 4. Portable measurement system. (a) Schematic illustration of portable measurement system. Small-sized Arduino board to replace bulk-sized oscilloscope for measuring oscillation frequency of sensor; 9 V battery supplies power to circuit. Operating conditions were VDD = 3.3 V, VLG = 2 V, RD = 1 kΩ, and N = 3. (b) Optical image of portable measurement system. Measured frequency displayed on the LCD screen. (c) Oscillation frequency vs. pH. (d) Real-time measurement of pH using portable measurement system.
Sensors 21 01939 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.H.; Park, S.J.; Han, J.-W.; Ahn, J.-H. Surface Potential-Controlled Oscillation in FET-Based Biosensors. Sensors 2021, 21, 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21061939

AMA Style

Kim JH, Park SJ, Han J-W, Ahn J-H. Surface Potential-Controlled Oscillation in FET-Based Biosensors. Sensors. 2021; 21(6):1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21061939

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Ji Hyun, Seong Jun Park, Jin-Woo Han, and Jae-Hyuk Ahn. 2021. "Surface Potential-Controlled Oscillation in FET-Based Biosensors" Sensors 21, no. 6: 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21061939

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop