Next Article in Journal
Study on the Optimization of Hyperspectral Characteristic Bands Combined with Monitoring and Visualization of Pepper Leaf SPAD Value
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Security of Bluetooth Low Energy in Two Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Monitors/Sensing Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Drift-Free Integration in Inductive Magnetic Field Measurements Achieved by Kalman Filtering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Validity of the Wrist-Worn Polar Vantage V2 to Measure Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability at Rest
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study

1
Department of Sports Science, German University of Health & Sport, 85737 Ismaning, Germany
2
Somnolab, 44263 Dortmund, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(1), 180; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010180
Submission received: 19 November 2021 / Revised: 24 December 2021 / Accepted: 26 December 2021 / Published: 28 December 2021

Abstract

Options for monitoring sports have been continuously developed by using activity trackers to determine almost all vital and movement parameters. The aim of this study was to validate heart rate and distance measurements of two activity trackers (Polar Ignite; Garmin Forerunner 945) and a cellphone app (Polar Beat app using iPhone 7 as a hardware platform) in a cross-sectional field study. Thirty-six moderate endurance-trained adults (20 males/16 females) completed a test battery consisting of walking and running 3 km, a 1.6 km interval run (standard 400 m outdoor stadium), 3 km forest run (outdoor), 500/1000 m swim and 4.3/31.5 km cycling tests. Heart rate was recorded via a Polar H10 chest strap and distance was controlled via a map, 400 m stadium or 50 m pool. For all tests except swimming, strong correlation values of r > 0.90 were calculated with moderate exercise intensity and a mean absolute percentage error of 2.85%. During the interval run, several significant deviations (p < 0.049) were observed. The swim disciplines showed significant differences (p < 0.001), with the 500 m test having a mean absolute percentage error of 8.61%, and the 1000 m test of 55.32%. In most tests, significant deviations (p < 0.001) were calculated for distance measurement. However, a maximum mean absolute percentage error of 4.74% and small mean absolute error based on the total route lengths were calculated. This study showed that the accuracy of heart rate measurements could be rated as good, except for rapid changing heart rate during interval training and swimming. Distance measurement differences were rated as non-relevant in practice for use in sports.
Keywords: wearables; sport app; accuracy; validity; field study wearables; sport app; accuracy; validity; field study

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Budig, M.; Keiner, M.; Stoohs, R.; Hoffmeister, M.; Höltke, V. Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study. Sensors 2022, 22, 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010180

AMA Style

Budig M, Keiner M, Stoohs R, Hoffmeister M, Höltke V. Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study. Sensors. 2022; 22(1):180. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010180

Chicago/Turabian Style

Budig, Mario, Michael Keiner, Riccardo Stoohs, Meike Hoffmeister, and Volker Höltke. 2022. "Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study" Sensors 22, no. 1: 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010180

APA Style

Budig, M., Keiner, M., Stoohs, R., Hoffmeister, M., & Höltke, V. (2022). Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study. Sensors, 22(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010180

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop