Next Article in Journal
Effects of Optical Beams on MIMO Visible Light Communication Channel Characteristics
Next Article in Special Issue
Monitoring Respiratory Motion during VMAT Treatment Delivery Using Ultra-Wideband Radar
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Incidence Holographic Profilometry for Large Gradient Surfaces with Sub-Micron Focusing Accuracy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Automatic Separation of Respiratory Flow from Motion in Thermal Videos for Infant Apnea Detection
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Infrared Thermography for Measuring Elevated Body Temperature: Clinical Accuracy, Calibration, and Evaluation

Sensors 2022, 22(1), 215; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010215
by Quanzeng Wang 1,*, Yangling Zhou 1,2, Pejman Ghassemi 1, David McBride 3, Jon P. Casamento 1 and T. Joshua Pfefer 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(1), 215; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010215
Submission received: 30 October 2021 / Revised: 6 December 2021 / Accepted: 20 December 2021 / Published: 29 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Contactless Sensors for Healthcare)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

please see document attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear editor and respected reviewers,

Thank you for the constructive comments. We have carefully and thoroughly addressed each item and modified the paper accordingly. Please see our response below and the revised manuscript for details. All edits in the manuscript are tracked. We believe the paper has been improved because of the changes. We are confident about the quality of our paper and would like to publish all review reports and editorial decisions alongside our paper. So, any comments as well as our response will be considered part of the publication.

Sincerely,

Quanzeng Wang, Ph.D.

Research Biomedical Engineer

Division of Biomedical Physics

Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories

Center for Devices and Radiological Health

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and suggestions are described in the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear editor and respected reviewers,

Thank you for the constructive comments. We have carefully and thoroughly addressed each item and modified the paper accordingly. Please see our response below and the revised manuscript for details. All edits in the manuscript are tracked. We believe the paper has been improved because of the changes. We are confident about the quality of our paper and would like to publish all review reports and editorial decisions alongside our paper. So, any comments as well as our response will be considered part of the publication.

Sincerely,

Quanzeng Wang, Ph.D.

Research Biomedical Engineer

Division of Biomedical Physics

Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories

Center for Devices and Radiological Health

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have provided an adequate and substantiate response to the questions of the reviewer of which several answers could be found in a previous paper of the authors to which they refer many times. The question is if the submitted paper is easily readable without knowledge from the previous paper.   

The authors state that this publication might contribute to the improvement of next-generation standards for IRT systems and the reviewer agrees. As mentioned, the reviewer recommends to emphasize that the new standards should take physiologic mechanisms into account in developing calibration algorithms for IRT systems.  

 

Back to TopTop