Next Article in Journal
High-Quality Video Watermarking Based on Deep Neural Networks and Adjustable Subsquares Properties Algorithm
Next Article in Special Issue
Automated Fluid Intake Detection Using RGB Videos
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Agent Team Learning in Virtualized Open Radio Access Networks (O-RAN)
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Development and Concurrent Validity of a Multi-Sensor-Based Frailty Toolkit for In-Home Frailty Assessment
 
 
Systematic Review
Peer-Review Record

IoT Adoption and Application for Smart Healthcare: A Systematic Review

Sensors 2022, 22(14), 5377; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145377
by Manal Al-rawashdeh 1,*, Pantea Keikhosrokiani 1,*, Bahari Belaton 1, Moatsum Alawida 1,2 and Abdalwhab Zwiri 3
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(14), 5377; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145377
Submission received: 10 June 2022 / Revised: 10 July 2022 / Accepted: 12 July 2022 / Published: 19 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things in Health Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is interesting but the organization needs to improve as there are many sections in the paper such as methodology should include information sources, selection criteria, and data extraction method, etc. In addition, the Discussion section should include the sub-section of challenges of effective IoT's adoption and research directions, gaps and implications for future research, etc.. Last but not least, the Conclusion section should include major findings and limitations of this study.

Author Response

Please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The purpose of this study is to accumulate existing knowledge about the factors that influence medical professionals to adopt IoT applications in the healthcare sector.Several recent studies have offered important insights into IoT adoption in healthcare. This paper just reviews the effective factors of IoT adoption in a systematic manner. This topic is not original, but relevant in the field. there are some fatal errors in the drafting of the manuscript. Also, the organization of the sections must be revised. the references Are appropriate.I have other questions and comments:


1. Section 12. Limitations : The text from line 464 to 487 is duplicated from line 488 to 507. Please check that the final version of the paper is submitted.

2. English is generally very good, but needs to be polished further.

3. Line 684 : "Table ??", please check all table number.

4. Text in line 669 is duplicated in line 686

5. Sections 13, 14, 15, 16 are not consistent, please revise the plan.

Concluding, it seems that this version is not well finalized and requires more revision.

Author Response

Please see attachment

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors reacted properly to my pointed issues.

Back to TopTop