Next Article in Journal
Near-Real-Time Strong Motion Acquisition at National Scale and Automatic Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Digital Olfaction for Table Olive Industry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acoustic, Phononic, Brillouin Light Scattering and Faraday Wave-Based Frequency Combs: Physical Foundations and Applications
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

OFDM System Design for Measured Ultrasonic Underwater Channels

Sensors 2022, 22(15), 5703; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155703
by Pablo Cobacho-Ruiz *, Francisco Javier Cañete, Eduardo Martos-Naya and Unai Fernández-Plazaola
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(15), 5703; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155703
Submission received: 29 June 2022 / Revised: 22 July 2022 / Accepted: 27 July 2022 / Published: 29 July 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is devoted to an interesting topic. It is well-structured and well-written. The content presentation is easy to follow.

Although the results are interesting and can help with the further synthesis of UAC systems, some minor issues are present.

Some minor grammar and punctuation issues are present (e.g., in line 96 “to kinds of …” should presumably be “two kinds of …”, in line 103 the word selection “choice …obeys” seems to be inappropriate, etc.) and must be fixed in the final version. 

Some abbreviations are introduced without being defined in the text at their first appearance (e.g., ICI).

The authors suggested restructuring sections 3.1 and 3.2 (or merging them) since it is hard to detach them as separate ones (both deal with the OFDM signal synthesis).

From the text, it is not clear enough the difference between the measured channels. Is it only separation distance? If yes, then why they were not ordered in a distance-increasing manner? This will help to follow the results easier.   

Fig. 15  is an essential element of the research (since it helps to find a compromise between Rate and BER), but it is hard to read it, and the text doesn’t bring any explanation. It is not clear what the Rb is? Was it measured for some specific channel, or it was aggregated somehow from all of those channels (if they were all active simultaneously)?

In Tab.4 the parameter “intra-symbol channel changes” is not defined or quantified.

In Section 4.3 classical CP-OFDM is described (without any innovations) thus, there is no need for such a detailed description. At the same time, very little space is devoted to the description of the results. It is expected that the discussion of the results will be expanded.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please find enclosed my report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop